:CD
"W M;" *V':'*t>:>
THE HISTORY OF IRELAND
TO THE COMING OF HENRY H.
THE
HISTORY OF IRELAND
TO THE COMING OF HENRY H.
BY
ARTHUR UA CLERIGH, M.A., K.C.
VOL. I.
. t '^^
\ 6 \
LONDON :
T. FISHER UNWIN
Adelphi Terrace
\All rights re served. '\
3)1^
R
U
SKALY, 1:HYERS AND WALKER
MIOni.E ABBEY STRKKT
I>tlBLT>*.
PREFACE.
This volume is the fruit of many years' labour. I have
to the best of my ability made every point the subject
of independent inquiry and written it in great part ex
messibtts meis. I have not worked in the expectation
of literary fame or pecuniary profit, but because I had
been convinced from early manhood that no greater
service could be done to the Irish race at home and
abroad than to tell them the naked truth as far as it
can be ascertained about their early history. This will,
no doubt, dispel many illusions which they will be
loath to part with ; but on the other hand, unless I
greatly deceive myself, it will convey lessons of high
political import which they may take hopefully to
heart. The early history of Ireland is a story of
arrested evolution.
ARTHUR UA CLERIGH.
CONTENTS.
Chap.
L-
II.-
III.-
IV.-
V.-
VL-
VIL-
VllL-
IX.-
X.-
XI.-
XII.-
XIII.-
XIV.-
XV.-
XVI.-
XVII.-
sj^yiii.-
XIX.-
XX.-
XXI.-
XXII.-
XXIII.-
XXIV.-
XXV.-
XXVI.-
XXVII.-
-Before the Coming of the Gael
-What Our Texts Say
-The Coming of the Gael ...
-The Gael ... ... •«• ••• ••■
-DfelRDRE ...
-Cuchulainn
-Finn mac Cumhail ...
-Glastonbury of the Gael ...
-The Coming of St, Patrick — I.
-The Coming of St. Patrick — 11.
-The Patrician Documents ...
-The Religion of the Gael Before St
Patrick — I.
•The Religion of the Gael Before St
Patrick — II.
-The Senchus Mor and the Tribal System ...
-The Tribal Occupier and Sir John Davis ..
-The Lia Fail — The Stone of Destiny
-Cuildreimhne and the Desertion of Tara ...
-The Northmen
-A Winter Circuit ...
-Brian Boru
-Clontarf ...
-The Organisation of the Church ...
■The Monks ...
-The Teaching of the Nations
-The Sect of the Scots
-The Emerald Ring
-The Cymro-Frankish Adventurers ...
Page
I
39
49
6i
72
87
107
131
148
164
185
200
212
236
246
257
... 2.29 .,
..l^ 290 y
••• 303
... 314
— 330
- 345
••• 363
... 380
••• 395
THE PRONUNCIATION OF GAELIC.
In the Gaelic alphabet there are i8 letters.
5 Vowels — a, o, u, broad, e, i, slender.
Each vowel may be long or short : long as in Half pay he
thought so poor ; short as in That bell is not mftch good.
Vowel Groups. Ae and ad = ae ; e<5 long = yo ; eo short = yu ;
HI long = ew ; ui short = yu.
Ai, ei, 61, Ae, e-A, e^, lAi. The sound of the long vowel is
given to the whole digraph.
The addition oft, e.g., ^1, does not change the vowel sound.
Short Digraphs. A\ and e-A short = a in bat. Gi or 01 = e in
let. I0 and ui = i in hit.
The consonants are 12 ; liquids, 4, L, n, |\ Cr), f (s); mutes, 9,
t), 0, -o, ^, 5, IT), p, c, and ti.
Aspiration or infection is a softening of a consonant, and is
indicated by a puncium over the Gaelic letter or by the
addition of the letter n.
t) or bti = v ; c or ch in the middle or end of words sometimes
= h ; t), "Oh and iti, mti alike = before a broad vowel, [a, o, u], an
indescribable sound like a guttural y and equal, before a slender
vowel, [e, i], y exactly. In the middle and end of ivords they arc
silent, but lengthen the preceding vowel, e.g., CisejriM, Tigherna
— Teerna. ttl, mh = v in the south and w in the north ; &Xi and
Arh = ou; xjt) = ei in the middle of a word ; p, pti = f; f , |*ti = h ;
t. cli = h.
Eclipsis (eKBXn^ic, pushing away). A softer consonant is
substituted for a harder at the beginning of a word only. Both
are written, but only the first, that is, the substituted one,
pronounced, e.g., m-bo, the b in bo, a cow, is pushed away and
replaced by m, and m-bo is pronounced mo. And so with
others, n eclipses -o and 5 ; bti, p ; b, p ; 5, c ; X), c ; c, f .
The above short sketch is, of course, very imperfect, and only
intended to assist readers who are unacquainted with Gaelic.
EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
i^'^ CHAPTER I.
BEFORE THE COMING OF THE GAEL.
THE name Erin^ comes from a root which signifies fat,
fruitful, with special reference, it may be supposed, to the
fertility of its pastures. Pomponius Mela'^ (fl. 40 a.d.) says : —
'• The climate is unfavourable for ripening cereals, but the land
is so exuberant in the production of pasture, not only luxuriant
but also sweet, that cattle can fill themselves in a short part of a
day, and unless they are stopped from grazing will feed too
long and burst." So Solinus ^ (230 a.d.) says : — " It is so
rich in grass that the cattle would be in danger from over-
eating unless they were kept at times from the pasture."
" Ireland," says Bede * (673-735), " is situated to the west of
Britain, and as it is shorter towards the north, so it extends
far beyond its borders to the south. . . . The latitude of
its position and the wholesomeness and mildness of the air are
much better than Britain's, so that snow rarely remains there
for more than three days, and no one mows hay there in
summer for winter use, or makes houses for the cattle. No
reptile is seen there, no reptile can live there. . . . The
island is rich in milk and honey, and is not without vines. It
^ According to Windisch the name Erin sen Erenn dat Erin Ace Erenn comes
from a root which is found in 7n[¥]iov, feminine Trinoa, signifying fat, fruitful,
and the Indo-germanio nominal suttix — ten. The initial " p " was not retained
by the early Celtic nations before a vowel, and the vfiaoQ niiipa of the Greeks
•would be represented by Erenn or Erin. The Greek name for the island, how-
ever, (E. lipvi], lovfori^, was taken from the Gaelic Erenn, and gave rise in its
turn to the Latin Juberna and Hiberuia. See Holder Sprachschatz. iverio.
^ Pompouius Mela, 3, 6, 53.
' Solinus, 22, 2.
^ Hibernia autem et latitudine sui status et salubritate et serenitate aerum
multum Brittani?e praestat. Bede, H.E. L Laiitudo is always, so far as I
have seen, translated " breadth " here erroneously. Erin is not broader. It
means breadth from the equator. The Anglo-Saxon translator of Bede has
braedo haes stealles where braedo is equal to the German " Breite," i.e.,
latitude. Caesar, Tacitus, and all the mediaeval writers following them, down
to and including Keating, held that Ireland lay between Britain and Spain.
Ptolemy, getting his information from a Phoenician source, placed it nearly in
its true position.
2 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
is famous for sport, fish, and fowl, and also goats and deer. It
is the own country of the Scots." It is a mistake to suppose
that Ireland is not also admirably fitted for the production of
corn, a mistake into which modern writers, such as Kiepert,
have also fallen. Taking wheat, oats, and barley, the average
number of bushels to the acre is at least as high as in England,
and the loss from bad seasons over a period of 25 years is not
greater than in Russia or America.^
Something must be said, though very little is known, about
the ancient inhabitants of Erin before the coming of the Gael
(1700 B.C.) Though the men of the old stone age (paleolithic)
made their way into England, there is no evidence that they
ever reached Erin, This is the more remarkable, as in those
days England was joined to the Continent, and Ireland to
England, by what we may shortly describe as land bridges.
A shallow bank now runs from Denmark to the Bay of Biscay,
^'"•d to a point about five miles westward of Ireland within
what is known as the 100 fathom limit. The elevation of this
bank made these bridges. Many of the pleistocene animals
passed over the bridge from the Continent into England, in-
cluding paleolithic man, whose implements are found abund-
antly as far west as North and South Wales. A human
paleolithic molar tooth has been discovered at Port Newydd,
near St, Asaph. These paleolithic animals, with the exception
of the hyena, and the great sabre-toothed bear, passed over
from England into Ireland. Paleolithic man did not reach
Erin. The depth of the Irish Sea is somewhat greater than
the depth of the German Ocean, and it may have happened
that the English bridge remained above water after the Irish
bridge had descended and become a sea bottom. Many great
animals, however, passed over. Amongst others the mammoth,
the hippopotamus (probably), the grizzly bear, the brown bear,
the reindeer, the great Irish deer, the red deer, the wild boar,
the wolf, the horse, the fox, and the badger. These have left
their bones in caves or under peat bogs to record their presence
in prehistoric times,
^ Documents in connection with the shipment of corn from Ireland to France
in the years 1297-8 a.d. may be seen in fac-simile MS. Plate S3, Gilbert, Sir J.
The value of the corn exported from Ireland in ten years, 1785-1795, when
separate accounts were kept of the Kingdoms of England and Ireland, visa
^4,256,360. " A country which now begins to supply Britain with near ona
million barrels of grain annually." Newenham, p. 216 (1809).
BErOftE tnE COMIKG 6V THE GAEL. S
To the men of the old stone age succeeded the men of the
new stone age (neolithic) whether immediately or after an
interval, or at what time or times cannot be stated with
certainty, but the opinion generally received now is that there
was no break, but continuous evolution. From these came the
first inhabitants of Erin. It is therefore of high importance
to know what were the physical characteristics of the inhabi-
tants of Western Continental Europe in neolithic times, and
particularly to ascertain whether they were long-skulled or
broad-skulled, dark or fair ; these being now generally recog-
nized as the most permanent characteristics, and the best test
of race. The North of Western Europe was inhabited by men
with long heads, light or blue eyes, and fair or reddish hair.
From this stock came the Gael, as we shall show later on.
The South was inhabited by men short in stature, with long
heads, dark hair, and dark eyes. These are divided by M.
D'Arbois into a pre-Ayran (Iberian) and an Ayran (Ligurian)
race. The centre of France and westward through Brittany
to the sea, was inhabited by an intrusive belt of men from the
east, short in stature, with broad skulls, dark hair, and dark
eyes, whom CiEsar refers to as Celts, and who are sometimes
called the Black Celts. It may be affirmed unhesitatingly
that no otf-shoot from this stock ever came to Erin. There
are no men of this type except ethnic strays to be found
amongst the population of Ireland in our times. Nor is it
difficult to understand how this came about. A glance at a
map of Europe will show that the men of this central belt in
France were likely to cross the channel into England, and,
no doubt, they did so ; and are in all likelihood the men who,
whether pure or blended with long heads, have left their
broad skulls in the round barrows of England. An island is
colonized, as a rule, from Continental parts directly opposite
to it. But where one island lies behind another it is more
reasonable to suppose that migratory tribes would pass round
the nearer island from Continental parts above and below the
nearer island to reach that which was more remote. The first
inhabitants of Erin came from one or both of the dark long-
headed southern races. These passed round the south of
England, and are now represented by the southern Welsh and
the short dark population in the west and south-west of
4 EARLY lEISH HISTORY.
Ireland. In England they combined probably with the long
heads of the long barrows. From these two races the main
bulk of the population of Erin was derived before the coming
of the Gael. They correspond with the first four " occupations,"
or " settlements," ^xxb^l^, of our texts.
The fifth " occupation " was by the Gael or Milesians. They
were tall men, with long skulls and red, golden-yellow, or
flaxen hair. They came from the Netherlands, the Elbe,
Sleswick and Holstein, and the recesses of the Baltic coast.
Our texts agree in stating that the Gael as well as the previous
occupants all spoke the Celtic tongue, and they are supported
in this by the circumstance that no place names of a different
lansfuao-e have been detected. It is for this reason that the
Irish came to be commonly referred to as Celts. But language
is no test of race, though linguistic evidence is of high import-
ance when soberly used for historic purposes. In the time of
Csesar, the inhabitants of central France and the Belgic dis-
trict of Celtic Gaul spoke a Celtic tongue, and the Celtic
tongue at one time extended far east beyond the Rhine.
Possibly the intrusive Celts, as the result of conquest and
commerce, gradually communicated their language to their
neighbours on the north and the south, and in this way the
Iberi and the Ligures came to adopt the Celtic language.
Csesar tells us the Gauls brought their names to Britain : — ■
The Belgse in the south-east, the Parisii on the Humber, the
Atrebates in Berks. With the immigrants from the northern
race the same thing occurred. In the second chapter of his
Geography, in which he deals with the British Isles, Ptolemy
(140 A.D.) mentions the Brigantes in the south of lerne, and
the Chauci, the Menapii and the Eblani on the coast.*^
Evidence of a similar kind is not wanting for an earlier
period. The most important of the pre-Gaelic " occupations "
(5At»x^lA) was the immigration of the Fir-Volcre, commonly
called Fir-bolgs, a sub-denomination of which was the o-reat
iribe of the Cat or Cathraige, of which Cairbro Cinnceat
became the head, as we shall see later on. The word Bolg
•> Dublin does not, as some have thought, represent the Eblani or their
capital. The words do not equate phonetically. Dublin was founded by the
Danes near the black pool of the Lifley ('Oiib tinn), from which it derives ita
name. The Eblani wure probably the Elbani immigrants from the river Albis
or Elbe.
BEFORE THE COMING OF THE GAEL, 5
equates phonetically with Vole, Latinised Volcfe. These
Volca3 were a powerful people in the South of France in
Caesar's time, occupying the country comprised between the
Rhone, the Cevennes and the Garonne. An outlying remnant
of the race then dwelt at the source of the Danube, on the
borders of the Ilercynian Forest. At an earlier period, it is
supposed, they occupied a large part of Central Europe, and
thus the two cities of " Lug " Lyons (Lug. dunum) and
Leyden (Lug. dunum Batavorum) belonged to them. They
were cut in two and displaced by the intrusive wedge of the
ethnic Celts we have referred to. There was also another Lusf-
dunum (Convenarum), now St. Bertrand de Comminges (Haute
Garonne), Lug-dunum Remorum (Laon) and others. Now in
modern Irish " Lugnasad " means the month of August. In
that month was celebrated the commemoration (nasad) or
anniversary of Lug at Tailtinn, now Teltown, in Meath.
According to our texts Lug was the foster son of Tailtin, the
wife of the Firbolg King Eocaid, the son of Ere. He appears
in the legend as Lug of the long hand, and is said to have
instituted this celebration in honour of Tailtiu, from whom
Tailtinn is named. The " nasad " or commemoration, however,
was not of Tailtiu, but of Lug ^ himself, and M. D'Arbois is of
opinion that there was a similar " nasad " of Lug at Lyoais,
which preceded the establishment of the Feast of Augustus.
The latter was celebrated on the 1st of August, and was, M.
D'Arbois^ thinks, substituted for the Feast of Lug. The fair
of Tailtinn, altered from time to time in its character,
continued to be held on the 1st of August in every year until
the commencement of the last century. As regards the
Cathraige, in the time of Cffisar they dwelt in the valleys of
the Durance and Isere, near Embrun, and Chorges, in which
latter the old name " Caturiges " is preserved. The terminals
ri.c, raighe, mean simply " tribesman" not "king."
In the " Coir Anmam" traighe is glossed cineal, -i.e. tribes.
Cath, or " cat," means " battle," and there are at Chorges two
inscriptions, " Cat " and " Cathreg," still retaining vestiges of
■^ Assemblees Publiques d'Irlande.
^M. D'Arbois compares the statement of Caesar as regards Mercury, the
Roman equivalent of Lug : — Hunc {i.e., Mercury or Lug.) omnium inventorum
artium ferunt, with tlie Samh-il-danach — aufnro\vTf)(^voi; " Master Of all art§."
Lugus was the god of light, the Sun god,
6 EAF.IY IRT^TH BI5TOBY.
the old nama I- Erin the '' Cath " tiib^ are found firom the
barony of Gary _ riige), in Antrim, to Iniscathy (Inis
Scatteiy), in the csiiiary of the Shannon. McFirbis reckons
them amongst thr F '.s- He men:: - V: Cithiaigeof
the Crnithne, fr _ — Cairbre Cumc- ' :: ied, and
the Cathraige ^^: -^ ^ :ek amongst - r_ ^^ i "a
mipeATin " (the Stone : ^ iTision), whi : . :
centre of Ireland, an^. is. in fict, onlv _ rs :
&om it, was also :..ll7.1 _ Oarraig Coitrighe in the Book of
Armagh.
InS: : .1-- :_ i ^.is — .Lr earliest times a powerful
people ^ - .:■ if I C.:.::_r-f ss in which the name is, probably,
preserve i . . - . _ : -- . T_r We5:cr:i is. .-i - which
were eaUea tnfi c^c ^ - - - "" Cait,' and aescribed
in the legend as irs: . : r of :r.T £ i-s of
Crnithne. They : ^ t.?., T Cat
mentioned by Am _ ._ ._..:; - r r f "r ._ s m
connection with :_ ^; . i^:^: :. _ /_ _ 1 .: _.
says (27.8.5): "T_r : . _ - _ _i :!--.: __ -^: :i,
harrassed the Bri::i-- - rtoal harryings."
Anda^ain: — "T_ 1:. i ivided into t^ ::i ; . nt-es)
:iir iDicalydones and Yen'j.r ;:,=, also the A:.:.: i^
.rir : — :^ ' hominiLm natio) and :iir ^ ::i,
\i_ir;T i i It (i.e., through Britain), and i . :e
ins. These are. no doubt, also the Attacoi rrferred
io oy St. Jerome (342-420) in the feimo . ^ ; ra about
to cite. He refers to a sojourn he made a; ircves. in GrauL
TrereiS, where the iElmperor Yalentiman T — ? -i_ :n residing,
is placed by Ausonius as fourth in h:; i c _■ i.ic ciiies. It
was on the right bank of the iMiosellr _- capital of that divi-
sion of Gaul, and the regular imp-:, i r siience: "When I
was a young man," he writes, '"I s. i- Aiticoti, a British
tribe [who were said to] est i :„ : r ::,nd though they
would find iu the woods herd; : _t :%:l i lattle, to be used,
to cut off the buttocks :: i_t_ ^-'^ ihe buttocks and paps of
women, and to cons: . L r tiie only tit bits." *
<aeebaBntiir| .i , ei com pe: jrs er
t^sjssXfxvm. '^ z . _r -r -;.. -■ ' -_ - _„ r". oipulas
ai^ae aisd rcr e: :^^- >. -^r :.:.rii»j3 y.
EEFOF.E rE" COMIXG OF THE GAEL. 7
The words in brackets " who were said to — qui dicehantar
do not appear in any MS. It may have been the omission of
the writer himself or of a scribe to whom he dictated. Jerome
refers to the time he was at Treves, where some Attacoti in
the Roman Army were stationed. That he meant to say he
saw them slicing men and women in the way he mentions
openly in the woods near Treves is not to be thought o£
Besides, " viderim solere abscindere " is neither sense nor
Latin. The context of the rest of the Dassaee, too long to be
given here, shows that he was dealing with matters of hearsay.
And this was, no doubt, one of the stories circulated by the
polished provincials of Augusta Trevirorum about the habits
and practices of the wild barbarians from Caledonia when on
their native heath. In the alternative we should conclude
that the statement was a hallucination of the desert.
It is not possible to assign a date to the commencement of
the neolithic or polished stone age. Lyall thinks it may have
ksted 10,000 years. It was succeeded in some places by a
copper age for a brief period, and then by the bronze age, the
commencement of which is fixed by Montelius for Scandinavia
at 1450 B.C. If we suppose it arrived somewhat earlier m
Erin it will bring us to 1700 B.C., the date assigned by the
Four Masters for the coming of Grokmh (the soldier) and the
GaeL It was during the neolithic time that the " Dobnens "
were built in Erin The word '-Dolmen" is derived from the
Breton "dol" (supposed to be a loan word from the Latin
" tabula," a table), and " maen," a stone. In its inception it
was a deadhouse of peculiar construction, built overground,
an imitation of a cave. XeoKthic man in earlv times, livinsr
in a cave himself, provided a similar abode for the departed.
In the case of paleolithic man a few traces only of burial by
inhumation have ye: been discovered. In the neolithic age
we mav su'opose a time when the bones oi the dead were
collected after the flesh had been removed by beasts or birds,
or the action of the weather. "We find a survival of this prac-
tice at the present day in the custom of the Parsees. Their
sacred book, the Ahura Masdi, however, allowed them the
option of either inhuming or exposing the dead, and a few of
the Parsees in Bombay exercise this option of inhuming at the
present day. Inhumation, decamation, mummification, burial
8 EARLY IBISH HISTORY.
in various postures, &c , were practised in various places, and
finally, incineration. Many of these modes were practised in
Erin, We need only refer particularly to incineration. It is
supposed to have come with the Ethnic Celts from the East.
Pothier^*' has given maps showing the route from the Pamirs
to Brittany. From the mountains of Central France these
Celts sent offshoots to the Pyrenees on the south and Danemark
on the north. Burials by incineration are placed over the
earlier forms or found cotemporaneous in the same tomb in
France and elsewhere.
And the same probably occurred in the case of Erin, where
incineration was extensively practised cotemporaneously with
other modes of burial. In the Carrowmore group, near Sligo,
the most remarkable in Erin, where possibly the victors at
the second Moj'^tura battle and their descendants found a resting
place, the graves reveal, in most cases where any remains are
found, the presence of calcined bones or urns, or other proofs
of burial by incineration. There are no round barrows indi-
cating the presence of round heads in Erin. It is certain that
these round heads occupied the valleys of the Loire and the
Seine until they were driven back into the mountain lands by
the invasion of the fair-haired, blue-eyed long heads from the
North, of which stock were the Gael, who practised inhuma-
tion. It has been observed that incineration brought with it
a more spiritual conception regarding the future life. Instead
of the ghoul-like existence' which the departed were supposed
to lead, enduring a shadow life as strengthless skulls in the
deadhouse of the dolmen builder, the spirit was supposed to
pass from the prison-house of earthly corruption, purified by
fire, into the fairy land within the elfmound (sidh), or the
mountain, into spacious palaces glittering with gold and gems.
And this is the existence into which the tribes of the Dedanann
passed according to our legends after their defeat and destruc-
tion by the Gael.
The construction of the dolmens showed much variety and
development, the details of which will be found in Mr. Borlase's
monumental work. The earliest form appears to have been
what was known as a cromlech — one large unhewn stone placed
J* Fpi-Ui^f S, Lcii Populatius primitives, 1897.
BEFORE THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 9
on two or more unhewn upright stones forming a sort of cave
with a narrow entrance. This covering stone was often of
immense size. The covering stone of the dolmen or cromlech
at Mount Brown (Carlow) weighs by estimation 100 tons, that
at Carriglass (Sligo) 73 tons, and the stone at Howth (Dublin)
70 tons. Men are puzzled to account for how with primitive
appliances such cap-stones could be moved into position.
Mortillet divides this form into two parts ; the cave portion he
calls an " allee couverte," the entrance portion a " vestibule."
The entrance in the next form appears elongated, and several
roofing stones were used with a slope upwards over the cave
proper. This was the form of Dolmen, commonly called the
" Giant's Grave." In France Mortillet terms them " caveaux " ^^
(vaults or cells) with long entrance passages (couloirs d'acces)
The entrance and passages to both these classes were open or
capable of being opened, though sometimes only two or three
feet high, and the cave could be reached through them. There
was a third form that had no entrance or passage into it — the
Cist. It was a large rectangular space lined with unhewn
upright stones and roofed with several unhewn stones flagwise,
placed within a mound or cairn of stones. Mortillet calls these
*' caisses."
For the student of the early developments of dolmen
building and the accompanying cultus of the dead there is
no country so rich in interest as France. Mortillet adduces
ovidence " that no fewer than twenty-four natural caves have
been discovered in France which had served the purpose of
sepulchral vaults to a population living in the neolithic age."
He adds that " the accompaniments of the dead as well as
certain indications bearing on the nature of the rites performed
at the sepulchre were identical with what was found in connec-
tion with the dolmens, so that the latter may be supposed
to have taken the place of the natural caves." France has the
highest claims to be considered the place of origin of the
dolmen, at least for Western Europe. The three types are
well represented, the first in Central France, the valley of the
Loire and Seine, the second in Brittany, the third in Logere,
Aveyron, Ardeche, and Lozere. Dolmens are rare in the East
and North of France. All three types are represented in
11 gee Borlase, " The Polmeu9 of Ireland," ii., p. 5G7, 1897,
10 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Ireland ; the first in long, large dolmens like that at Labbacallee
in Cork, the second by the great tumulus at New Grange,
in Meath, in which is to be found an architectural ampli-
fication as regards the roof not present in Brittany ; the
" caisses " of the third type are comparable to the dolmens in
Clare. In Ireland there is also another type— the dolmen cairn
or dolmen circle to be seen at Carrowmore and elsewhere, and
also on the coast of Cornwall where the dolmens are identical
in type with those of Ireland. Dolmens of these types are
widely spread over the globe, but are not to be found
everywhere, as is sometimes supposed. Their distribution is
curious. From France they pass into Spain, Morocco, Algiers,
Tunis, the Caucasus, Palestine, the North of Persia, and India.
They are not found on the Mediterranean east of Corsica,
nor in Tripoli, Egypt, Asia Minor, Greece, Italy, or the valley
of the Danube. Borlase ^'^ reckons a total of 780 dolmens for
Ireland, the distribution of which is very remarkable. On
the East coast there are only 77, of which Wexford counts for
2, Wicklow 9, Dublin 14, Louth 4, Down 19, and Antrim 29.
On the West coast there are 436, of which Kerry counts for
22, Clare for 94, Galway for 30, Mayo 45, Sligo 163, and Donegal
for 82, showing thus a remarkable preponderance of dolmens
on the West coast. Besides the dolmens Borlase reckons 50
chambered tumuli differing from the dolmens constructively
in the circumstance that the roof is not formed by a single
slab but by successive layers of slabs approaching each other
as they rise — what is commonly known as the beehive con-
struction. Thirty of these chambers are found in Meath. such
as New Grange and Dowth. Their structural details prove
them to be connected with the dolmens proper, presumably in
relation to an identical cultus of the dead.
Borlase further observes that " the occurrence of dolmens in
Cornwall and the West of Wales, coupled with the fact of their
absence in North England, and their great scarcity in Scotland,
whilst the coasts of Ireland possess them in plenty, all tend to
give plausibility to a theory that the route by which those who
erected them arrived was from the South, either down the
English Channel or up the western coast of Europe, and so
12 Borlase Dglmens, ii., 418, 567.
BEFORE THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 11
round the Land's End, and up St. George's Channel, and
around the entire coast of Ireland, which island they specially
made their own."
There are cup-markings and sculpturings on the stones of
many of these dolmens, all the world over, which probably had
some religious motives underlying them. In Ireland the prin-
cipal sculpturings are found at the cairns and tumuli which
extend along the hills of Slieve na Caillighe, for some three
miles from East to West north of Loughcrew in Meath. Sculp-
tured stones are also found at Clover Hill, near Carrowmore,
in Sligo, at New Grange, Rathkenny, Castle Archdale,
etc. The general character of the sculpturings or markings
are cup-shaped hollows, and irregularly, circular, spiral, zigzag
and wavy lines, and these lines are far more elaborate and
complicated at Loughcrew and New grange than elsewhere.
Art travelled from the coast to the centre of the island, making
progress on the way from Carrowmore to Slieve na Caillighe.
The position of the latter is central. From it (904 ft.) can be
seen the hills of Cuailgne, near Carlingford Lough, on the east
coast, and the hills near Sligo on the west. M. Emile Soldi in
" La Langue Sacree le Mystere de la Creation," has attempted
to solve the mysteries that lie behind these cryptic symbols
which are more widely spread over the world than even the
dolmens. His book is very interesting and attractive, but it
is for others better equipped than the author of this work to
sit in judgment on it. To him it appears rather suggestive
than persuasive. The Sun, according to the Sacred Language,
is the principal manifestation of the soul of the world — Fire
the creator. It consists of a soul or essence-fire from which
proceed all fires, all essences, and all souls ; and also of a body
or envelope, the luminous ether, from which proceed all bodies
and all lights. Every created thing is in like manner com-
posed of a soul or essence and of a body or envelope.
The circle, with the central point representing the solar
disc ; the circle in relief, or cup-shaped ; the spiral, the zig-zag,
the wavy forms [representing the germs of life emanating
from the sun] M. Soldi regards as cosmic signs representing
the movements of the ether and its different manifestations,
expressing ideas as to the creation of all things, as to life,
death, and resurrection, and other mysteries. These signs or
12 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
figurations (cosmooflyphic) were the first writing of Egypt, and
were superseded by the phonetic system. They " are to be
found everywhere, with the same significations amongst all
peoples, rendered by the same images with forms so special,
singular, and conventional that no one can object that they
are due to chance or the natural sameness of the expressions
of the human brain." ^^ If M. Soldi was called on to explain
the sculpturings or scorings at Cloverhill, Sligo, near Carrow-
more, he would probably say that the large circle with the
central point represented the sun, the two smaller circles
emanations, points of fire and life from the sun, the horizontal
lines the direction of the movement, and the goat or ram's
horns the conducting energies which were to convey the vital
sparks to the dead and clothe the bones with flesh and life.
The whole was, in substance, a prayer for resurrection written
in " cosmoglyphic " language.^*
Without taking into consideration the chambered tumuli,
formed with courses of masonry overlapping inwards in bee-
hive fashion, which stand on debatable ground and seem to
be the product of neolithic construction, the evidence of the
dolmens and the sculpturings is persuasive to prove that in
neolithic times Ireland was not an unknown and isolated
island, but was in the full current of the progress of the time
and in advance of any part of Europe standing vathin the
same parallels of latitude. The men who built the dolmens
in Sligo, and probably many more that have perished without
leaving any trace behind, must have been a numerous, wealthy
tribe, with religion and laws and social order in process of
evolution. This, we venture to submit, was mainly due to the
fact that there was direct intercourse between the south-west
of France oversea with Ireland, along the route of the Dolmen
builders. Erin was not isolated or wholly divided from the
rest of the world in neolithic times. The dolmens and the
sculpturings alone are suflicient to prove that the island was
well in touch with such progress as had then been made, and
1^ Soldi Eniile, " La Langue Sacree le Mystere de la Creation." Paris, 1897,
p. 88, et seq.
^^ These sciilptiiiriugs are reproduced from drawings by Mr. Wakeman in
" The Dolmens," vol. i., p. 141, and arc simpler than those at Loughcrew.
According to M. Soldi, the " casmoglyphio " language may be expressed also
by the arranger ►eat of precious stones, arms, etc, ia tli? tombs,
BEFORE THE COMIKG OP THE GAEL. IS
was, in fact, ahead of any region situated on the same parallel
of latitude in Western Europe. The population must have of
necessity been small, judged by a later standard.
The land was covered with forests. Erin was called the
"island of woods." But this was also the case with Britain
and Central Europe. A vast forest extended in Caesar's time
from the source of the Danube to the Carpathian mountains,
and great forests, the remains of greater forests, extended
from the Rhine to the Atlantic ocean.
[ 1^ i
CHAPTER 11.
What Our Texts Say.
" A MIXTURE of a lie" (saith Bacon), "doth ever add
■Li- pleasure." A popular historian should make his story
as pleasant reading as fiction. Let us be gentle, therefore, in
our criticism of the " File," whose duty it was " to put a thread
of poetry " around the tales and traditions that came down
from a remote past. The first persons who landed in Erin
were three fishermen from Spain, who were driven by adverse
winds into the mouth of the river Moy, near what is now the
town of Ballina. They were drowned in the universal deluge.
Forty days before the deluge, Ceasair, the daughter of
Bith, and grand-daughter of Noah, landed at Dun-na-mBarc,
in Kerry, on Saturday, the 15th day of the moon.
This is what brought her to Erin. Bith, her father, sent
a messenger to Noah, to ask whether he himself and his
daughter, Ceasair, would get a place in the Ark, to save them
from the flood. Noah said that they would not get it. Fintan
asked the same, and Noah said he would not get a place.
Bith, Fintan, Ladhra, and the maiden Ceasair, go into
council afterwards. " Let my advice be done by you," said
Ceasair. " It shall be done," say they. " Well, then," said
she, "take a hand-made god, i.e., an idol, and make adoration
to him, and abandon this God of Noah." After that they
brought with them a hand-made god, and he said to them to
make a ship, and go on the sea ; however, it was not known
to him what time would come the flood. A ship was made by
them afterwards, and they went on the sea. It is the number
that went with them — three men : namely, Bith, Fintan, and
Ladhra ; also three women, Ceasair and two others, and fifty
maidens with them.^
This Fintan was afterwards a celebrated personage,
Fintan, " the salmon of knowledge." He was turned into a
' See introduction to " Book of Leinster," and the following texts and
translations, " Fintan's Poem : " Oss. Soc, v. 244, Giolla Caomghin's Annalad
Anall uile ; Trip. Life, 530, Erin Ard, Inis na rig ; Todd Lee. Ill , 142 ; Ogygia
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 15
salmon when the flood came, and some said he was resuscitated
after the flood and lived to the time of St. Patrick. It was a
common saying amongst the people to a late period, " If I had
lived Fintan's years I could say much." What occurred
before the flood, in which all perished who were not in the
Ark, might have been written on a stone, or communicated by
Fintan. The view, however, that was most strongly held, and
which found favour with Keating, was that the facts were in
after- time revealed to a favoured mortal by his Fairy Lover
(l,en^np"6e).
One hundred and twenty years after the flood Adhna
came to Erin and took from it with him the full of his hand
of the grass. His occupation was not considered effective by
Senachies, and is not counted a " s^bxilcuf." Two and
seventy-eight years after the flood (2680 B.C.) Partholan,
fleeing for the murder of his father and his mother,^ landed
at Inver Sceine (Kenmare Bay), pushed up the west coast to
Inis Saimer (Fish Island) near the mouth of the Erne, and
finally settled at Magh Elta, the plain from Howth to
Tallaght, three miles south of Dublin. According to the
Psalter of Cashel, as Keating tells us, Partholan started from
Greig Mheadhonaegh, which seems to be Maeonia. It is the
way he went through the Toirrian Sea to Sicily with the
right hand to Spain and thence to Erin. The context shows
that the Toirrian Sea cannot be the Tyrrhene Sea. It may
be intended to indicate the sea west of Tyre. "With Partholan
came his wife Dealgnaid, their three sons, and 1,000 followers.
They defeated the Fomorians, 800 in number, in a battle near
Lough Swilly. The Fomorians were all killed. This was the
first battle that was fought in Erin. After the Muintir
Partholain (Partholan's people) had passed 300 years in Erin
they were all carried off by the plague in one week — 5,000
men and 4,000 women. This plague stroke (cAirhfLeACu) is
commemorated in the name Tallaght at the present day." ^
The first jealousy, as it is called, of Erin also occurred in
Partholan's time, and must not be passed over. We shall give
2 It is remarkable that Partholan, first Kins of Ireland, and Brutus, first
King of Britain, are both abhorred for having killed both father and mother.—
Todd.
5 Tallaght is however usually derived from catH, plague, and leAcc, grave.
16 EARLY lElSS HlSTOEr.
it abbreviated in the words of Keating. During the absence
of Partholan, Dealgnaid received the attentions of her groom
of the chamber, Todga (^e ua 510IU irein), and when Partholan
reproached her, it was not an apology she made, but she said
that it was more just the blame of that ill deed to be on him-
self than on herself, and she spoke the verse —
Honey with a, woman leave, new milk with a child,
Food with a generous man, flesh with a cat ;
A woi'kman and his tools together ;
One with the other it is great danger.
Erin was then waste for thirty years after the plague stroke
(CAMtiifle^Cc) of Partholan's folk till Nemed came to inhabit
it. The track which he journeyed in coming to Erin from
Scythia was on the narrow sea which is coming from the ocean
that is called Mare Euxinum. He gave hisri^ht hand to the
Riffacan mountains till he came into the Northern Ocean, and
his left hand to Europe till he came into Erin.* Thirty-four
ships was the number of his fleet and thirty persons in each
ship of them. The occupation of the race of Nemed lasted
for 217 years, until the arrival of the Fir-mbolgs (Firvolce).
From the very first, however, the possession of Nemed was
contested by the Fomorians, who were also, as we have seen,
adversaries of the first race. Nemed was at first victorious ;
he won three battles. The third appears to have been a
Pyrrhic victory. In it was made a " red slaughter " of the
men of Erin under Arthur,'^ the son of Nemed, and Jobcan, the
son of Starn, his grandson, as the old poem certifies —
" The Battle of Cnamhross, which was tremendous,
It is greatly in it flesh was hacked,
Arthur and Jobcan fell in it,
Although in it Ganu (i.e., the Fomorian) was defeated."
After this Nemed died of the plague, with 2,000 of his
folk, in Oilean Arda Neimed (the Island of Nemed's Height)
* There M^ere two routes from the East in primitive times — one north of the
Caspian, the other more southerly, over the Crimean Bosphorus between the
Euxine and the Sea of Azof, which is the route here indicated. This route
then passed up the valley of the Danube, with the Carpathian — i.e., the Riffacan
mountains (semble) on the right hand.
^ This is the first time the name Arthur occurs in story. The Cornish
prince was probablj- a Gael. The name occurs often in the Scotch Gaelic
pedigrees. This reference has escaped Zimmer who does not mention this text in
his article on the name Arthur. He has collected the earUest eiampla*
known to him in his article on Nennius, p. 28-t.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAT. 17
now the Great Island, in Cork Harbour. After this disaster
the Nemedians were unable to cope with their foes. These
Fomorians, we are told, were sea rovers, robbers on the high
seas (po-rhuifit)), and came from Africa. They seized what is
now Tory Island, off the N.W, coast of Donegal, on which they
built a stronghold known as Conaing's Cop, hence the name
Tor-inis. From this they enforced tribute from the race of
Nemed. The amount of the tribute was tv/o-thirds of the
children, of the corn, and of the milk of the men of Erin to be
given to them every year on the eve of S*irii^in (Hallowe'en)
to Magh-g-Geidne, between the Drobhaois and the Erne.
Rage and anger seized the men of Erin, and they rose up and
mustered their forces to attack their oppressors. The island,
which is nearly three miles long and very narrow, is about
eight miles from the shore. The men of Erin effected a land-
ing, laid siege to the Tor,^and demolished it. Conan himself
and his sons fell in the combat. More (another Fomorian
leader) arrived soon after with the crews of three score ships
from Africa. A furious battle ensued. The combatants did
not perceive the sea coming in under them, with the obstinacy
of the fighting. They fell mutually ; all who were not killed
were drowned, with the exception of the crew of one bark,
thirty strong men under three chiefs — Simeon Breac, lobath,
and Britan Maol. Borlase, who visited the island, thought
from its configuration and elevation " that it did not afford a
spot fitted to have been the site of the tide coming in on the
fighters."^ Ceesar Otway, however, writes as follows: — "In
the month of August last (1826) a strong and unforeseen
storm set in from the north-west, which drove the sea in
immense waves over the whole flat part of (Tory) island. The
waves beat over the highest cliffs. All the corn was destroyed,
the potatoes were washed out of the ground, and the springs
of fresh water filled up." ^
After this combat the Nemedians in Erin took counsel, and
resolved te fly from the tyranny of the Fomorians, and after
preparing for seven years set sail for various parts in 1,130 !
vessels — between ship, bark, skiff', and small boat. Ten heroes
•^ Tor, root " Tver," to hold, enclose, =; " fenced town or huttery." These
slrongholds were usually on hills, " Tors."
^iJolmens 111., 1081.
* Sketches in Ireland, 1827, p. 13, note.
18 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
remained behind in command of the remnant, who continued
under the slavery of the Fomorians inhabitng Erin, until the
coming of the Fir-mbolgs. The Four Masters say "216 years
Nemed and his race remained in Erin, after that Erin was a
wilderness for 200 years."
The Leabhar Gabhala does not represent the Fomorians as
having made an "occupation" (sAbAlc^r) of Erin. They
were invaders, raiders, but not occupiers. Partholan and
Nemed were occupiers but not invaders. The term invasions
is not applicable to the taking possession of unowned and un-
inhabited land, and is not used by McGeoghegan, who uses
the word " inhabitancy." We have already indicated our view
that Phoenician traders made their way to Erin at a very early
period, and in those early days and to a much later time, not
very far removed from our own, there was a very thin partition
dividing the trader from the pirate. In the usual course trade
led on to tribute, tribute to revolt, revolt to extermination or
slavery. This Fomorian tradition appears to us to approximate
very closely in its broad outlines to true history.^ There were
two tributary poisons by which the pure stream of tradition
was fouled on its way to us. We may refer to them as the
poison of the synchronists and the poison of the etymologists.
The synchronists, beginning with creation, must have felt
considerably relieved when they came to the flood, from which
they could take a new departure. Keating tells us that " all
the colonists who took Erin after the flood descended from
Magog, the son of Japhet. At Sen, the son of Esru Partholan
and the children of Nemed separate from each other, and At
Seara the Fir m-bolgs and the Tuatha Dedannan and the sons
of Miled also separate. And it is the Scotic language all these
tribes spoke."^° This was the accepted view, and to sustain it
some ingenious devices were resorted to. Nemed's grandson,
for instance, Simeon Breac, went into Greece, it was said, to
escape the oppression of the Fomorians. His race multiplied
there, and came back as Fir m-bolgs, so called from the sacks
(bolg) in which they used to carry earth for their task
masters ! ! ! The synchronists met with difficulties from the
outset. Chronologists were hopelessly at variance as to the
length of time that had elapsed from the Creation to the
*545-AiTn "zcapio, and <i5 sib^il :; O'.cupatio, a takiag possession. ^°Cap. vii.
WHAT Otfe TEXTS SAY. 19
Birth of Christ. Keating in his preface, as an evidence of
such disagreement amongst the best writers, gives the compu-
tations of the widely divergent authorities. The usual com-
putation of the " Irish Domestic Annals," as O'Flaherty terms
it, agrees closely with the computation of Scaliger. There
were, however, other computations in the Irish Annals. The
Four Masters, following the Septuagint, and Eusebius, and
reckoning 5,199 years from the Creation to the Birth of Christ,
were following also an old Irish rythm. O'Flaherty, whose
figures we quote below, relies mainly on a poem by Giiia
Caemhain (11072), while Eocaid Ua Floinn (flOSG) cited in
the margin of Ogygia,^^ appears to have calculated 5,199 from
the creation to the birth of Christ. In addition to these
elements of confusion, the copies of the old texts differed from
each other, and from the originals, through the inaccuracy
and inattention of the transcribers. The synchronist, begin-
ning with Partholan, 22 years before the birth of Abraham,
had to produce a king or a colonist, or account for his absence
from that time until the birth of Christ, or as O'Flahertv
describes it, " a synchronism in which the epoch and genera-
tions of the Irish are accurately collated with foreign ones."
The chief of these synchronisms was arranged by Flann of the
Monastery. He was a lay professor (Fir leighinn) at the
Cistercian Abbey of Monasterboice, in Louth. He synchronized
the Kings of the Assyrians, Medes, Persians, Greeks, and the
Ptoman emperors with the kings of Erin, in parallel columns,
century by century. He died in 1066, and his learning, which
was very great, can of course throw very little light on our
early history. An examination of the subjoined table will
show that there is very little difference between the various
computations from the time of David, which may be approxi-
mately fixed at about 1000 B.C." Michael ua Clerigh, the
Chief of the Four Masters, in his preface to the " Book of
Occupations," states that it appeared to him " whose inheri-
tance it was from his ancestors, to be a chronicler," that it
would be a charity for some one of the men of Erin to purify,
compile, and rewrite the ancient honoured Chronicle which is
called the " Book of Occupations.'"^-^
" Ogygia (1685), p. 3 and 8. The marginal note referred to is omitted in
Hely's (1793) translatioa. p. xxvii.
12 Ogygia, Part II. -^ OCurry (MSS.), p. 172.
20 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
" We give (he writes) the computation of the Septuagint
for the first four ages with the computpvtion which the intelli-
gent and learned men who folloYv'ed them applied to the ages
of the world from the creation to the birth of Christ, which
they divided into four parts. Among these are Eusebias, who
in his Chronicle computes from the creation to the birth of
Christ, to be 5,199 years. Orosius says that there are from
Adam to Abraham 3,184 years ; and from Abraham to the
birth of Christ 2,015 years, which makes the same number.
St. Jerome says in his Epistle to Titus that 6,000 years had
not then been completed. St. Augustine, in the City of God,
counts it at 6,000 years. The reason we have followed the
writers who foUov; the Septuagint is because they have added
a fifth to their ages, and so make out the period of 5,199 years
from the creation to the birth of Christ. So also the Roman
Martyrology." ^* A tabular view of the chronology of our
texts and of sacred chronology will be found in the following
table : —
Chronology of Our Texts.
Four
Scaliger.
Domestic.
Masters.
Keating.
From the Creation to the
Deluge ...
1656-1583
1656
2242
1656
Thence to ceasiug of the
Flood
1
Thence to birth of Abraham
292
292
942
344
Thence to David
940
942
940
—
Thence to Captivity
471
473
485
Thence to Birth of Christ
589
589
590
— ■
Creation to Christ ... 3949 3952 5199 4052
SACRED CHRONOLOGY.
The variations are endless on this subject. De Vignolles
reckons 200 different computations. The following is offered
as a popular, but disputed view : —
Hebrew. Samaritan. Septuagint.
Adam to Noah 1656 1307 2241^
Noah to Abraham 292 942 942
Abraham to Chri8-u ... 2044 2044 2044
3992 4293 5228
The reign of David may be assigned to 1,000 B.C
The fall of Jerusalem „ 586 ,
"' OCurry MS., 170, 172, condeneeci.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 21
We may deal more briefly with the etymological poison.
It may be safely stated as a general rule that whenever any-
thing is stated to be a fact in connection with an etymology
in nine cases out of ten it is sure to be pure fiction. ^^ The
Dindsenchus, a mytho-heroic topography, the Coir Anmann,
a mytho-heroic biography, and Keating, are filled with these
absurdities. It is only fair to add that absurdities almost as
great continued in Classical literature well into the middle of
tjie nineteenth century, when their place was taken by the
absurdities of the solar myth. Much, if not all, the synchron-
isms and legends connected with pre-Gaelic Erin must un-
hesitatingly be set down to the influence of Christianity and
the invention of early Christian bards, who felt a desire to
trace their kings back to Japhet. The native unchristianised
genealogies all converge to the sons and nephews of Golamh
(Milesius.) The legends of their exploits and those of their
successors are the real race heritage of the Gael "unmixed
with the fanciful Christian allusions and Hebraic adulterations
of the pre-Milesian story which was the last to be invented."^''
The third " occupation " of Erin was by a people whom
recent writers call Firbolgs ; but whom the Gaels called Fir-
nnholgs or Firhholgs, and whom MacGeoghegan very properly
denominates Firvolce in his translation of the Annals of Clon-
macnoise. The Firvolce held possession of Erin for thirty-seven
years from 1934 to 1897, during which there were eight kings !
We shall see that next to the Gael they were the most important
people that occupied Erin, and had many sub-denominations.
They were, our texts say, the descendants of Simeon Breac,
the son of Starn, the son of Nemed. The fourth occupants
were the Tuatha Dedanann, descended from Jobath, the great
grandson of Nemed, who held possession for 197 years (1897-
1701 B.C.) The second, third and fourth " Occupants " were
thus Nemedians, of one stock, speaking one language, and
held possession at the coming of the Gael. There were three
sub-divisions of the Firvolce, the Fir Domhnann and the Fir-
Gaiieoin, all, however, in common were called Firvolce, though
sometimes accounted distinct and separate occupants.^'^
15 Isidore of Seville 636 a. D., called his encyclopaedia work de omni scibili.
" Books of Etymologies " — (Libri Etymologiarum, xx.)
" Hyde " Literary History," 46. For ethnology of Firvolce see Cap. I.
1' 5i-6eA'6 soititeoji pr'-t>^o^S 5° coiccionn ■ooib uiLe. — Keating, c. ix.
22 EARLY IRISH HISTORY..
The five sons of Deala, who was ninth in descent from
Starn, the son of Nemed, commanded the expedition of the
Firvolce, which consisted of 5,000 in 1,130 ships, counting
ship, bark, skiff, and small boat. They sailed from Greece,
over the Torrian Sea to Spain, and thence to Erin, which they
divided into five provinces— Ulster, Connact, Leinster, and
South and North Munster. They established a pentarchy with
an Ardrigh, and were governed by eight kings in succession
during the thirty-seven years they held possession. In after
times the Fir-Gaileoin were associated with Leinster, and the
Fir Domhnann with North-West Connact — the latter having
originally landed, it was said, at Blacksod Bay. The ninth
and last high king was Eocaid MacErc, who had to wife Tailtin,
daughter of Maghmor, King of Spain, the foster-mother of
Lug. According to the Poem of Columba, it was she that
founded the fair of Tailtin. She founded the Fair as the
Nasad of Lug, the Sungod (not god of the son), and it was
not, as more frequently stated, Lug that founded the Fair in
commemoration of Tailtin. The mortal name of Lug in Gaelic
tales is Lugaid Lam-fada.^^
There was no rain or tempestuous weather in Eocaid's time,
nor a year without great produce and fruit. All injustice and
unlawfulness were suppressed, and sure and excellent laws
were ordained in it. He ruled the land from Royal Tara for
ten prosperous years. When Nuada landed with the Tribes of
Dedannan (UuaCa "oe "OAtiAnii), and demanded a settlement
in the country, Eocaid refused his kinsman's request, and
said — " Leave the land, remain as slaves, or fight to the death."
A fierce battle was then fought at Moytura, in Mayo, at the
neck of land which joins Lough Mask with Lough Corrib,
sometimes called Moytura Conga.
The field on which the battle of South Moytura is said to
have been fought extends from five to six miles north to south.
Near the centre of this space, and nearly opposite to Cong, is
a group of five stone circles. On other parts of the field are
six or seven large cairns of stone, amongst which is the
18 i^, injen iTlAsmoit^ rii -oaI- ■ooit ben ecViAc rtiic "Ouac
goiiAb x:■6.^\.z^n b)iointie oetiAis Ain mutme tojA triic ScAil,.
It is the daughter of Maghmor, the family is not obscure, the wife ol
Eocaid, £0D of Duacn, that was the founder of the Fair of Tailtin. and the
foster-mother of Lug, the son of Seal. L.L., p. 8, col. 1.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 23
celebrated one-man cairn (Cam an aoin Fir), a name handed
down by tradition. The story that has reached us in writing
states that on the morning of the fourth day of the battle, Eocaid,
the Ardrigh, while bathing at a well near the cairn, was sud-
denly attacked by three of the foe. His giolla fought the
three single-handed and slew them, but died of his wounds,
and was buried with honour in a cairn close by. Sir W. Wilde,
book in hand identified the well, as he tells us, and caused the
cairn to be opened, and found it contained an urn.^^
The "red slaughter " was preceded by a combat between
three " nines " at each side in a game of " hurley," which took
place in the " Valley of the Athletes " (Glean-mo-Ailleam).
The twenty-seven Dedananns were defeated and died, and " the
heap of the game " (Carn an Cluithe), which may be seen to
this day, was erected over them. " How like in its way," says
a recent historian, " to the erection on the plain of Marathon,
pointing out where the Athenians fell ! " The great fight
lasted four days. Fathach, the bard, chanted the battle song
(Rosg Catha) of the Firvolce to hearten them for the fight ;
Edana, the poetess, led the chant on the side of the Dedanann.
The High King and Sreng led the Firvolce, and performed
the usual prodigies of valour ; Nuada, the Dagda, and Ogma
commanded the Dedanann. Sreng engaged Nuada in single
combat, and cut off his right arm at the shoulder with a sword
cut, but Nuada survived. On both sides healing baths of hot
milk and herbs had been prepared for the cure of the
wounded. " It is from Lusmag, in the King's County,
Diancecht brought every herb and grated them at the well of
Glainge in Achad Abla before the battle of Magh Tuiradh,
when the great battle was fought between the Tuatba Dea
and the Fomori." ^'^
Nuada's wound was in time healed by the skill of
Diancecht, the King's physician, and Credne, the craftsman
(Ceard) made a silver arm for him, and the king was ever
after known as Nuada of the Silver Hand (Nuada Airgid-lamh).
On the fourth day the Firvolce were completely routed, and
Eocaid, the Ard Righ, was slain. A cairn was erected over
him at the Hill of Killower, distant about a mile from Lough
" Sir W. Wilde's address to Royal Irish Academy.
^Res. Coll., xvi., 59. Dinnseanchvs. L\isrcag.
24 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Mask. It is called Carn Eocaid, and is the most extensive
and remarkable in the west of Ireland. A few miles to the
east of the battlefield is the Hill of Knockma, five miles south-
west of Tuam, on the top of which is the mound of Cesair,
who invaded ! Erin with fifty maidens and three men before
the Flood, and is known now probably as Finnbheara, queen
of the fairies of Connact.-^ The origin, names, and use of
many of the monuments on the plain are to be found in a
Sao-a descriptive ^^ of the battle. The annals of Clonmacnoise
say, " 100,000 men were slain in the fight, which was the
greatest slaughter that ever was heard of in Erin at one time."
According to the Saga, the Firvolce afterwards obtained from
the Dedanann the province of Connact, which was known,
amongst other names, as Sreng's " fifth," up to the time of
Conn of the Hundred Battles. Keating, however, says that
the Firvolce fled to the islands of Arran, Islay, Rathlin, and
the Hebrides, which they held possession of until driven out
by the Picts. They then fled to Leinster, and finally returned
to Connact in Queen Meve's time. Many pedigrees were sub-
sequently traced to this stock, which produced distinguished
soldiers. O'Flaherty, whose opinion on this point is of special
weight, tells us that in the time of the Gaels " whom very
probably they assisted in dispossessing and expelling the
Dananns, they were restored to their landed properties and
dignities. For Crimthan Skaithbell, one of them, was consti-
tuted governor of Leinster by King Heremon, which was
afterwards denominated the province of the Gallinians. The
Erneans and Martineans, of whom there is frequent mention
in subsequent accounts, were the descendants of the Firbolgs.
The Damnonians were the most ancient princes of Connact to
the time of King Cormac. ... Of these were three particular
families — the Gamanradians, the Fircraibians, and the Tira-tha
Thaiden, by whom Connact was divided into three Connacts,
and the people were denominated also the Firolnegemacht." ^
21 Dolmens III., 799.
22 0' Curry MS., 247.
23 O'Flaherty, Ogygia III., c. si., p. 175. Tigernach, a.d., 35, calls it Coice-o
r-OltiecmAcc. olnejmACt: was supposed to be the daughter of a Firvo|.ce
chief. Book of Lecan, fol. 221. After the race of Conn of the Hundred Battles
— namely, the sons of Eoeaid Muigmeadon (Brian and Fiachra) took possession
of Connact it became known as Cuinn-iocta, i.e.. Conn's race, and the Hy Briuin
and the Hy Fiachra became the dominant power in Connact.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 25
The Dedananns appear to have been assisted in this battle
by Fomorians. These, however, were not the African sea
rovers who fought on Tory Island, but warriors from the
northern seas. Nuada, suffering from a personal blemish,
could not reign until " his hand had been welded with a piece
of refined silver." Breas was made High King in the interim,
and ruled for seven years. He Avas the son of a Fomorian
chief, Elatha. His mother was a Dedanann. Another inter-
marriage of importance, as we shall see, is also mentioned.
Cian, the son of Diancecht the physician, married Eithlenn, or
Ethnea, the daughter of Balor of the " Stiff Blows," and
Kethleen his wife, and had issue the celebrated Lugaid Lamh-
fadha. This, however, was only his mortal parentage. His
real father was the Sun-God Lug. Breas proved to be a
niggardly tyrant. " The chiefs of the Dedananns were dis-
satisfied, for Breas did not grease their knives ; in vain came
they to Breas, their breath did not smell of ale. Neither their
poets, nor bards, nor druids, nor harpers, nor flute-players, nor
musicians, nor jugglers, nor fools, appeared before them nor
came into the palace to amuse them." He had reduced many of
the bravest of the chiefs to a state of vassalage and servitude.
Cairbre the satirist, son of Etana the poetess, was shown " into
a little house — small, narrow, black, dark — where was neither
fire, furniture, nor bed. He was given three little dry loaves,
on a little plate. When he rose in the morning he was not
thankful." The indignant poet thereupon wrote the first
satire that was written in Erin.
Breas was forced to resign soon after. He then went to
his father, Elatha, the Fomorian chief, and having secured
the aid of Balor of the " Mighty Blows " and the " Evil Eye,"
and of Indech, the son of De-Domnand, two powerful chiefs,
he invaded Erin. From Tara to Tory Island, from Staffa to
the Giant's Causeway, the sea was spanned, as it were, by a
bridge of ships of every description. A great battle ensued.
It was fought on the plain of Moytura, about fifty miles north
of the former battle, near Lough Arrow, at Kilmactraney, in
Sligo. Nuada, the Dagda, Lugaid Lamh-fadha, Ogma, and
Delbart were the leaders of the Dedananns. Breas,
Elatha, Balor, Tethra, and Indech were the leaders of
the Fomorians. Two ladies graced the combat by
26 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
their valour. Macha fought for Nuada, and Kethleen,
the wife of Balor and grandmother of Lug, carried
sword and spear in the ranks of the Fomorians. The arms
carried by the Fomorian chiefs and their costume are
described by the authors of the tract on the second battle of
Moytura. Elatha the king "had golden hair down to his
shoulders. He wore a cloak braided with golden thread, a
tunic interwoven with threads of gold, and a brooch of gold at
his breast emblazed with precious stones. He carried two
bright spears with fine bronze handles in his hand, a shield of
gold over his shoulder, and a gold-hilted sword with veins of
silver and paps of gold." He had, in addition, a breastplate
and a helmet. A fierce fight ensued. Balor of the " Mighty
Blows " cut down Nuada with his sword, and Macha, running
bravely to aid the king, fell to his spear. Kethleen hurled
her lance at the Dagda, and inflicted a wound from which he
died one hundred and twenty years afterwards. Ogma was
slain by Indech. The victory of the Fomorians seemed assured,
but Lug then rushed to the rescue. From his stafF-sling
(c|\Anti cAbAU)he whirled a mighty stone at Balor. It entered
the " evil eye," pierced the brain, and passed out through the
back of the skull. The mighty Balor fell, to rise no more.
The 3Ior Riga then arrived to help the Dedanann, and the
battle " was broke " on the Fomorians, and the plain was ever
after known as Magh Tuired na bh-Fomoruch (Moytura of the
Fomorians)." ^
" Recent scholarly attempts," says Borlase, " to master the
details of this battle legend, have tended rather to counten-
ance the view that the two stories relate to one and the same
event," the battle in the Northern Moytura.^^ M. d'Arbois
lends the great weight of his authority to this view, which
seems to be helped by the fact stated by Douglas Hyde, that
in the oldest current list of Irish sagas, drawn up probably in
the 7th century, only one battle of Magh Tuired is mentioned,
i.e., what is now known as the second or Northern Battle.^^
^ O'Curry MS., 248. The tract which contains this Saga, which has a
Viking flavour, is referred to by Cor mac MacCuilenain in illustration of the word
" Nis," and is undoubtedly old, but still written as a Saga 2,000 years after the
battle.
Annals Clonmacnoise. Murphy, S./., Ed., 1-18, " of whom Inniskilhean
took the name."
25 Dolmens III., 803.
2« Ir. Literature. 283.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 27
Against this view must be weighed the very old local tradi-
tions at Cong, and in the introduction to the Senchus Mor, a
later text, both battles are referred to. Our view strongly
inclines to side with M. d'Arbois, but the question does not
admit of a peremptory decision. The meaning of the words
Tuatha De Danann, or Tuatha Dedannan, is still a vexed
question. If De means gods, then the natural meaning of
Tuatha De is tribes of gods, and the De Danann would become
mythological beings. " The mythological beings," writes
Borlase, " who constitute the Tuatha De Danann took their
name from Dana, the daughter of Dealbeath." An alternative
translation, suggested by M. d'Arbois, is "tribes of the
goddess Dana," i.e., who worshipped Dana. On linguistic
grounds, Hyde considers this version venturesome, which is a
polite way of sajang that it cannot be sustained.-^ The old
Irish did not attach this meaning to it, nor is there any trace
of a worship or cult of a goddess Dana by special tribes in
Erin. They explained it as " men of science who were as
gods." This is still more venturesome, in our opinion. It
was probably suggested by the supernatural feats of Lug and
Balor. We prefer to consider De Danann to be a tribal name-
word of the same class as De Domhnan, the father of Indech,
already mentioned. There were no anthropomorphic gods or
goddesses in Erin at this time. We have not overlooked a
primitive Aryan Dev-os, or the Sanskrit Dyaus, which probably
meant originally, not a god, but the bright Firmament, a
conception which was not likely to survive under the ever-
weeping skies of Erin. The Sun, the Moon, the Wind, etc.,
were the objects of their worship. We consider, therefore,
that Dia, gen. De, was a loan word from the Latin Deus, as
Dia day, was a loan word from the Latin dies. We, therefore,
claim for humanity the redoubtable tribes of Dedanann.
An examination of the various views and theories that
Lave been broached in reference to the Dedanann would
require a volume. The plan of this work, and the space at
our disposal, compel us to forego the pleasures of controversy.
We must, therefore, be content with stating in a summary
way the conclusions at which we have arrived. They are the
cumulative result of many considerations, which do not lend
27 Ir, Literature, 286.
28 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
themselves to precise and detailed statements. We present
them merely as a tentative and conjectural attempt to solve a
problem which is, perhaps, insoluble.
There was, we think, but one battle of Moytura, which was
fought on the plain now called Moyterra, near Lough Arrow, in
Sligo. The Dedanann, aided by Northern Fomorians, after a
hard fought field, routed the Firvolce, and slew their High
King Eocaid. They then took possession of Tara, and most of
what was afterwards known as the " Fifth " of Meath, extend-
ing from the Boyne to the Litfey, and southwards and west-
wards to the Shannon. They ousted, or reduced to slavery,
the inhabitant Firvolce, most of whom fled to Scotland and
the Western Isles. ^^ The Fir Domhnan branch of the Firvolce
were, however, allowed to remain in Connact, paying tribute.
The Fir Gailleoin branch, too, were allowed to remain in
Leinster, as tributaries. The Dedanann then, occupying the
rich pastures of Meath, with wealth of slaves and tribute, soon
became very powerful, made great progress in civilization,
and were the builders of the sepulchral monuments near the
Boyne — which may be called " the pyramids of Erin." -^ They
were, however, a military aristocracy, and had no roots in the
soil, and when defeated by the Gael with the aid of the
Firvolce, they were slain in battle or expelled from their
territories in Meath. They then disappeared completely from
history and passed into fairyland and romance. No genuine
legend or tradition concerning them reached our annalists.
Such traditions were preserved in families, and there were no
Dedanann families left to preserve them. The families of the
Firvolce, on the other hand, remained. In them the father
passed the tradition on to his son, as the tradition of the
Exodus was preserved and passed on by the Hebrews. If we
were to suppose that no book was written or printed, the story
of the Exodus would reach us substantially as we find it. The
bitter herbs and the Paschal Lamb, and the Cup, and the
question why does this night differ from other nights at the
Passover every year, would secure its preservation. And so
^ These fugitives were possibly the Cuaca-Cac, or Attacoti, of after-time.
29 " The Cloghaun or beehive hut, as it existed in the Firvolce period, was
developed by the Dedanann into their magnificent structures, not inferior to the
Treasury of Atreus," and " it is noteworthy that sepulchral monuments with
these beehive roofs are unknown in the Scandinavian archaeological area."
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 29
the traditions of the Firvolce, and afterwards of the Gael, were
handed down from father to son. They are genuine in sub-
stance, but often over-laid, contorted, and metamorphosed in
the social and religious changes that supervened.
There remains for consideration in this chapter an isolated
and exceptional religious cult, which in its general character
must be described as Semitic, while its special details appear
to correspond closely with the Phoenician, or Carthagenian,
ritual in the worship of Melkarth or Moloch. The matter is
one of high importance, as we shall see when we come to
consider the cult of the Gaels at the coming of St. Patrick.
On it has been mainly based the contention that the Gael were
anthropomorphic idolaters.
In the Tripartite Life of St. Patrick we read that he went
over the water to Magh Slecht, a place in which was the chief
idol of Ireland — namely, Cean Cruaich — covered with gold
and silver, and twelve other idols covered with brass, about
him. These idols were probably of wood, and covered with
gold or brass plates. ^^ Here the idol is called " Cenn
Cruaich" {i.e., bloody head); but the common name for it
was Crom Cruaich, or Crom Dubh, that is " bloody stoop " or
" black stoop " — which indicates that the idol was stooping
forward. ^^ These names were evidently not the names given
to the idol by votaries ; what it was called by them we do not
know.
Maofh Slecht was situated either in Cavan or in Leitrim.
O'Donovan thought at one time that it was in Cavan, near
Ballymagauran, but afterwards wavered in this view, as
Douglas Hyde tells us. ^^ Canon O'Hanlon, ^^ in his life of St.
Patrick, contends that Magh Slecht was in the plains of
Leitrim, not far from Ballinamore, near Feenagh, This view
has much to recommend it, and maybe provisionally accepted.
The district is noticed by Borlase, who refers to a group of
monuments within a mile and a half north of Lough Saloch. ^*
^ These idols were the only anthropomorphic idols found by St. Patrick in
Erin. Jocelyn's story of the twelve idols at Cashel is merely a variant of
Magh Slecht. We shall refer to it and the story of Tigerninas later on.
•''1 Tripartita Life— Stokes, p. 91.
'^ Literature of Ireland, p. 86.
*=* O'Hanlon's "Lives of Irish Saints," vol. iii., p. 581.
** Dolmen's, vol i., p. 194.
so EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Some of the graves there were opeued, and no human bones
were discovered. The bones of cows, sheep, and horses, were
found in them in abundance. O'Donovan asks did men ever
erect graves over cows and horses ? We can answer, that in
France ancient tombs have been found without human bones.
These are supposed to have been for the accommodation of
the souls of men who died in war, and whose bodies could not
be recovered. Borlase also says, " there must have been
several dolmens among this group of monuments." ^
The account of this idol in the Dinnsenchus, which con-
tains stories and legends about the hills and famous places in
Erin, is as follows : — " Magh Slecht : 'Tis there was the kinar
idol of Erin — namely, Crom Cruaich, and around him twelve
idols made of stones, but he was of gold. Until Patrick's
advent he was the god of every folk' that colonised Ireland.
To him they used to offer the firstlings of every issue and the
chief scions of every clan." 36
In the Book of Leinster there is a poem on this subject,
which is, no doubt, earlier than the prose Dinnsenchus, which
has been translated by Kuno Meyer.^^ We quote the following
verses from it : —
Here used to be
A high idol with many fights,
Which was n-aiiied the Cromm Cruaich.
It made every tribe to be without peace.
In their ranks stood
Four times three stone idols
To bitterly beguile the boats.
The figure of this Cromm was made of gold.
To him without glory
They would kill their piteous, wretched offspring ss
With much wailing and peril 1 [501I 7 sai-oJ
To pour their blood around Cromm Cruaich.
We shall now refer to the Semitic or Phoenician cult.
Though there is sporadic or inferential evidence of child
sacrifice in many parts of the world, the Phoenicians and their
colonists, especially the Carthagenians, are the one civilized
'^■' Might tombs have been made for the holocaiisted ?
^'' The Rennes Dindsenchus, Rev. Celt., vol. xvi., p. 35.
»• The Voyage of Bran," vol. ii., p. 304.
''■' The children used to be slaughtered in Israel and Phoenicia before being
burue^A-
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 31
people of antiquity of whom we know that the sacrifice of
their own children was practised, not as an occasional recru-
descence of savage superstition, not in the hole-and-corner
rites of some abominable mystery, but as an established and
prominent part of the public religion.
Such sacrifices took place either annually on an appointed
day or before great enterprises, or on the occasion of public
calamities to appease the wrath of the god, i.e., Moloch, the
Fire God.^^
From Phoenicia it is supposed that this cult was introduced
into Judah. The offering of children by fire in the Tophet in
the Valley of Hinnom, near the Temple itself, is frequently
referred to and denounced in the Old Testament. Jeremiah
protests repeatedly that Yahwe had not enjoined these sacri-
fices. The people of Judah built the Tophet sanctuary in the
Valley of Ben-Hinnom " to burn their sons and daughters with
fire, a thing Avhich I commanded them not, nor did it enter
into my mind."
Compare now the ritual in Carthage as described by
Diodorus Slculus with what we may reasonably infer was the
ritual at Alagh Slecht, bearing in mind that the custom was to
slaughter the victims before burning them and probably to
pour the blood either on the statue or round it or on the altar.
The blood was, no doubt, the most precious part of the sacrifice.
" In 310," writes Diodorus, "when Agathodes had reduced
" Carthage to the last extremities, seeing the enemy encamped
"before the city, they {i.e., the Carthaginians) were struck
" with fear of the gods for having neglected their worship,
" and, hastening to correct their mistakes, they selected 200
" of their most distinguished boys {tUv iTtKpavia-aTwv 7rd(owi')and
'' sacrificed them as public victims. 2\ow they had a brazen
^^ staUie of Cronos (i.e., Malkorth or Moloch) stretcldng out the hands
" upturned, and bending towards the aarth so that the boy placed upon
" them would roll of anl fall info a int of fire."
\lv CE na^ alrolq dvcpiuc Kpopov \^a\KoiJi EK.rtrat.u>Q rac \t7paQ vTrrlo'
iyKiKXifiEvac t/rt 7-171' 7^*', wTrs rov iwi-tdivTa tCjv ira'icuiv uTroKvKiiatiai
sal TrlTTTeiv £tc ri ^oT^a irXfiptQ ■nvpo^.'^
^See Moloch. "Encyclopaedia Biblica Cheyne," and Hastings' "Diet of
Bible." DoUinger Judenthum und Haedenthum, 427.
■io Deodorus Siculus xx., 14-5. — Dindorf, 1867, Ed., vol. iv., p. 163.
32 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
If the idol at Magh Slecht was black, with a bloody head
stooped forward, it is difficult to resist the inference that it
was an idol of the same character and for the purposes of the
same cult as that practised at Carthage. Nor is there any
difficulty in supposing that the Phoenicians had intercourse
with Ireland. At an early period, so far as is known, they had
their first home in the Persian Gulf. They then settled in
South Arabia and Somaliland, and passed up the Red Sea into
Egypt, thence into Philistia and Phoenicia, and then pushed
westward across the Mediterranean, following the lines of
water communication by sea or river. Phoenician Kings ruled
in Egypt during the fifteenth dynasty (1928-1738) and during
the sixteenth dynasty (1587-1327). In the Greek traditions it
is not easy to separate the Phoenicians from the Egyptians,
and the Irish tests speak of an Egyptian but not of a
Phoenician connection. Whatever truth may be contained in
these texts must be explained by PhoBnician relations with
Ireland.
The Phoenicians, according to Mouers, founded Cadiz as
early as the fifteenth or sixteenth century B.C. Others place
the date some centuries later. We think Mouers is likely to
be right. The tendency of the evidence derived from recent
excavations and researches is to throw back those dates. We
may be certain that the Phoenicians had passed through the
Pillars long before they founded the colony.^ There can be
no question that they sailed into the North Sea, trading pre-
sumably, amongst other things, for amber. *^ A Phoenician
merchant won the favour of the nurse of Eumaeus by the
present of a chain hung with amber beads. ^^
XpvTeof dpfxov i-^^jiov fifTa 5' i]X£Krpoi(Tiy iepro. — (Odyssey, 15, 460.)
This amber was found not only in the Baltic, as was
formerly supposed, but also on the shores of Friesland and the
neighbouring islands between the mouths of the Rhine and
the Elbe, and on the west coast of Denmark. Beads said to
be of this peculiar amber were found at Mycenas, and in the
tombs of the early dynasties in Egypt. Maspero asks how
*' Phoeaisches Altertluun." vol. ii., 2ncl part, p. G25.
*^ Rawiinsoa's " Phceaicea," p. 302.
«" Amber. All about it." J. C. Hacldon, 1892.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 53
many bands they passed through.^* If they were sea-borne
by the PhoBmcians the answer is not difficult. It cannot be
proved from the classical texts that the Phoenicians passed
through the Cattegat into the Baltic,*^ and as there was plent}'
of amber in the North Sea they would have no object in estab-
lishing a perilous trade route into it. The Baltic trafSc would
thus pass, as we know the fact was, by overland routes, by the
Vistula, the Danube and the Rhine.
"Without the trade in amber," says M. Oppert,^^ "the
ancient navigators, especially the Phoenicians, would never
have heard tell of the Western seas."
The Phoenicians were great miners and metallurgists, Mr.
Borlase, now resident manager of several tin reservations in
N.W. Spain, says : — " I once believed the Scilly Islands and
" the Land's End district were in truth the islands {i.e., the
" Cassiterides), being unaware that tin had been raised in any
" appreciable quantity in Gallicia. A study of the mineralogical
" features of North Western Spain has completely altered my
" views. The ancient tin workings of Gallicia prove to be of
" enormous extent ; that it was from the bays and estuaries of
" Ferrol, Vigo, etc., and the islands of Cycas, Cies, or Boyona
" that tin first found its way to the Mediterranean for the pur-
" poses of bronze through the agency of Phoenician merchants,
" I feel no doubt ; that the vague district over the sea, namely,
" Cornwall, was soon recognised as an important field of pro-
" duction may be taken for granted also." ^'^
Borlase pronounces the Spanish tin to be abundant and of
superior quality to that now produced in Cornwall. So it does
not seem clear why the Phoenician, having plenty of a superior
metal in Spain, should have recourse to Cornwall. Nor is it
clear why, having an abundance of the finest copper ore to
hand in Spain, they should not manufacture bronze, which is
an alloy of copper and tin, on the spot. We venture to suggest
that bronze was first manufactured in Spain by the Phoenicians ;
there is no other place in Europe where copper and tin are
found together. A large number of copper celts have been
^ Maspero's " Dawn of Civilization " (1897), p. 393. The beads found in
the tombs by him still possessed electrical properties.
^■^ Mullenhof " Deutsche Altherthumkunde," I., 215,
*^Oppert, Jules, "L'Ambre Jaune chez les Assyrias," Paris, 1880.
'■^ Borlase, Dolmens, vol iii,, p. 1,233 (N.B, in Appendix after Index).
D
34 EARLY lEISH HISTORY.
found in Ireland as well as in Spain and the Cevennes, indi-
cating a transition period between the stone and the bronze
age.
The Phcenicians were great explorers. Under Necho,
Pharaoh of Egypt (611-595 B.C.), they circumnavigated Africa.
They set out from the Red Sea, doubled the Cape of Good
Hope, having, they alleged, the tnin on their right hand, and
returned through the Pillars of Hercules after an absence of
three years. This reference to the sun being on the right
hand has been regarded by some as conclusive evidence of the
truth of the story. Herodotus says the thing was to him
incredible, though he believed in the fact of the circum-
navigation. It iSj in reality, neutral and proves nothing.
The Phoenicians knew perfectly well that if they sailed from
East to West so far South, they should have the sun on their
right hand. They had pushed their trade East and South,
and an inscription in the Phcenician tongue has been found in
Borneo. The marvel is how Herodotus, if he went as far south
as Syene, where the sun is vertical at the summer solstice,
could have found any difficulty in believing the statement.
This is some corroboration of Mr, Sayce's view that he never
went so far south.
Sometime in the sixth century, two expeditions, which
appear to be in a measure supplementary to the former, started
from Carthage. The first was commanded by Hanno. This
Periplus, which has come down to us in a Greek translation,
states "It was decreed by the Carthagenians that Hanno
should undertake a voyage beyond the Pillars of Hercules,
and there found Lybo-Phojnician cities." He sailed accord-
ingly with sixty ships of fifty oars each, and a body of men
and women to the number of 30,000 ! and provisions and other
necessaries. The Penteconlers were a convoy ; the men and
women were in merchant ships, oXkuSeq. The number appears
to be excessive. Possibly it should be 3,000. Hanno
founded the colonies, no trace of which remain, and on
his return inscribed the particulars of his voyage on a
tablet, which he dedicated in the temple of Melkarth at
Carthage.
The second expedition was commanded by Hamilco, and
sailed, according to Pliny, at the same time as that of Hanno.
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 35
" While the power of Carthage was at its height,*^ Hanno
" made the passage round from Gades to the borders of Arabia,
" and left a written account of his voyage, as did also Hamilco,
" who was sent out at the same time to explore the outer coasts
" of Europe," The account of the voyage is found in Avienus,
who was pro-consul in Africa in 866 AD., and who states that
he took it from the archives at Carthage.^^
Hamilco passed through the Pillars, and sailed to the
" ^strymnides rich in tin," which W3 assume wore the Cas-
siterides Islands, off Spain, already mentioned. Hence he
laid his course north, and m two su7is, which means probably
2 days and 3 nights, 60 hours, made the coast of Erin, the
distance being about 540 nautical miles, from the North of
Spain to the South of Ireland. ^'^
The account in Avienus we give in a translation : " But
hence (that is, from the yEstrymnides) in two suns the ship's
course was to the Sacred Island, for so it was named of old.
This, amidst the waves, spreads wide its soil ; the race of the
Hiberni cultivate it widely. Near it again the island of the
Albioni is spread." ^^
" Sacra," sacred, is in Greek hpa, which comes near
7rieipa[apov^a) and lepyt), the Gieok name for Erin. The poetic
licence is not great.
Avienus adds that the Carthaginian colonists and seamen
generally passed through the Pillars inio tha Sbas, which
Himilco reported that he himself had found by experience
could not be crossed in less than four mouths owing to calms,
the sluggishness of the watnrs, and the vast quantity of sea-
v/eed. The sea was shallow, and wild animals and sea
monsters abounded as the ships crept along. This appears to
*3 Pliny, N. H. II., 67. Et Hanno Carthaginis potentia fiorente circum-
vectus a Gadibu3 ad finem Arabise navigationem earn prodidit scripto, sicut ad
extera Europas noscenda missus eodeia tempore Himilco.
^^ Ora Maritiraa, 103-112.
™ Philip O'Sullivan Beare says in 1619, the voyage from Erin to France took
scarcely more than two days, and the voyage to Spain three days. The
voyage from Kinsale to Corunna in Spain was frequently made in the time of
his" uncle, the hero of Dunboy. — Decas Patritiana, 161'J, p. 21.
^^ Ast hine duabus in sacram (sic insniam
Dixcre prisci) solilus cursus rati est
Haec inter uudas multa cespitem jacet
Eamque lala gene Hibernorum colit
Propinqua riirsus insula Aluionura patot.
— Ora -Marjtima, v., 108-112.
86 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
indicate pretty clearly the Sargasso Sea in the centre of the
North Atlantic, and it is difficult to avoid the conclusion
arrived at by Vossius that America would have been reached
only for " the enormous floating banks of gulfweed, on which
a large number of pecular animals live," to borrow a modern
description of the Sargasso Sea.^^.
However this may be, in fact we present the view merely
as a probable conjecture. It does not possess the quantity or
quality of probability that we call historical truth. The
Phoenician traders had, undoubtedly, a complete know-
ledge of the coast round Erin, and it is from them that
Ptolemy and Marianus, of Tyre, derived their information. ^^
We have devoted, perhaps, a disproportionate space to this
part of our subject in order to prepare our readers for the
intelligent appreciation of our next chapter. In the penumbra
of legend and tradition the reader will be able to see his way
more clearly when he has purged his mind from the error of
believing that the men of Erin lived in a state of isolated
savagery, practising cannibalism, and sacrificing their children
to a bloodthirsty god.
Note —
The referenee to Ireland in the Agricola may be conveniently given
here. Tacitus tells us that his father-in-law, Agricola, in the fifth
year of his campaign, A.B. 82, " crossed the Frith of Clyde in the first
" ship (probablj' when navigation commenced). He reduced peoples
" hitherto unknown in battles at once frequent and successful, and,
" equipped with troops the parts of Britain which look towards Ireland
" (probably Calloway) not that he feared an attack, but rather hoped
" (to invade tliat country) ; since Ireland placed in the middle between
" Britain and Spain, and convenient also for the Gallic Sea would unite
" the soitndest parts of the Empire (i.e., Britain and Spain, etc.), to
" their mutual advantage. Its size is rather small compared to Britain,
^2 As to communication with America by the Pacific route from India, via
Malaysia at a very remote period, see Professor O. T. Masson's Migration and
the Food Question; a study in the peopling of America." Washington, IS04,
and L. C. Johnston — " Did the Phoenicians discover America ? " He says yes,
and that they laid the foundations of the Aztic civilization. Geog. Soc.
CaliforFiia, 1892.
^3 Brehmer, in his " Entdeckungen," 1822, first insisted strongly on this
point. He was opposed by Heereii, in an essay read before the Royal Society
of Gottingen (1824). Letronne and Askert took the same view. Latham, in
his article, " Brittanicffi Insulae," without referring to Brehmer, obsers'ed that
Ireland was a country which, so far as it was known at all, was known
through the Greeks, the Iberians, and Phtienicians. Finally, Nordskiold, a high
authority, in his Fac Simile Atlas (1889), p. 31, col. b), adopts Brehmer's view
— " Trotz det stora anseende som Heeren med raitta atujuter som forskart i den
grek^ska, Kulturdestorien tvekar jag ejatti denna fraga i Viss man stalla mig
pa Brehmers staindpunkt."
WHAT OUR TEXTS SAY. 37
"but is greater than that of the islands in our sea (^ e., the Mediter-
" ranean.) The soil climate " intellectuals " (ingenia) and habits of the
" people do not differ much from Britain ; the landinrj places and
" harbours (differ) for the better, and, are well known thrcmgh traders
and dealers." Agricola had sheltered one of their chieftains who had
been exiled in consequence of their civil strife, and under the guise of
friendship kept him to use him when wanted (m occasionem).
I have often heard him, i.e., Agricola, say that " with one legion and
a few auxiliaries Ireland could be put down and held, and that it would
be an advantage against Britain, too, if the Roman arms should be on
all sides, and liberty put away out of sight. — Agricola, c. 24.
The passage we have translated in italics stands as follows in tvv^o
Vatican MSS., and in the Codex Toletanus (of Toledo) which has been
recently collated by Dr. O. Lenze of Tubingen. (See Philologus, vol.
8, p. 549). " Solum, coelumque et ingenia cultusque hominum haud
multum a Britannia diflferunt ; in melius aditus, portusque per coni-
mercia et negotiatores cogniti." Tins text presents no ditKculty, if (a)
differunt can be supplied according to the usage of Tacitus from the
preceding clause, and (6) if " difterunt in melius " can be translated
" differ for the better." Tacitus has in melius referre and " in melius
nuitatue," and we have found in the De Civitate Dei the following : —
" Quod si ita est ecce Platonicus in melius a Platone dissentit {i.e.,
diffei's in opinion from Plato for the better). Ecce videt quod ille (i.e.,
Plato) non vidit."— De Civitate Dei, Book 10, c. 30.
Halm's suggestion that the words interiora parum have dropped
out of the text — that is, " the interior of the country is little known,
the landing places and harbours are better known," has nothing to
recommend it, if true, the learned Professor will have succeeded in
placing in the text of Tacitus the only platitude to be found there.
The superiority of Ireland in the matter of harbours was greatly
relied on in the evidence given before the Committee of the British
Privy Council when the commercial relations between the two countries
were, at the end of the eighteenth century, under consideration.
English manufacturers were to be ruined, etc., it was contended, if
equal advantages were conceded to the Irish. — See Newenham's " View
of Ireland," 1809, p. 14.
A note of a technical character may find a place here to state and
answer an objection that may be fairly made. The objection is : If
the Phoenicians had the full knowledge you suggest of the British Isles,
how came it to pass that Ptolemy, who had that knowledge communi-
cated to him, has so misdescribed the northern part of Britain ? The
answer is : Ptolemy was primarily an astronomer, as a perusal of his
first chapter and his Almagest will plainly show. On astronomical
grounds, principally on inferences from the length of the longest day
which he gives for Big and Little Britain in the Almagest, he placed
the British Isles about 5 degrees — say 300 miles — too far north. The
northern limit of the oiKovfitvri was also a fixed line for his calculations,
the details about which cannot be given here. When he approached
this line in preparing the tables given in his second chapter (which we
shall call his map, though no map is known to have been made in his
time), and compared the space left with the distances in the itineraries
S8 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
•of the Phoenicians, he found that these distances would not fit in north*
"wards. So he crumpled, contorted, and turned eastwards the configur-
ation of the land on his map to make it fit in. Now the proposition
for which we contend is the result of a careful and minute examination
of that configuration, and the place-names given bj Ptolemy, and a
comparison of both with present conditions. It is this on which we
invite the judgment of men better equipped for the task than we are —
viz., that if these crura plings, contortions, and twistiugs, were shaken out
and rectified, it would be reasonable to infer that the tables or itiner-
aries of the Phconicians were as accurate for North Britain as they
were for South Britain nnd lerne. It is important also to note here
that he attaches the " Ebudce " (Hebrides), which were no doubt the
" glacialis lerne " of Claudian to the Map of lerne.
[ 39 ]
CHAPTER III,
The Coming of the Gael.
IN Spain there Avere born to Breogan two sons, Bile and Ith.
Bile was the father of Golamh (the soldier), who was
afterwards known as Milesius, or Miled, of Spain. When
Golamh (Gollav) grew up he went on his wanderings : first to
Scythia, where he married Sreng, the daughter of the king ;
and afterwards to Egypt, where he married Scota, the
dausfhter of the Pharaoh Nectonibus. The descendants of
Breogan prospered in Spain, and multiplied ; but hard times
came, and there was a great drought for twenty-five years,
and a famine, and their strength was wasted in conflicts with
other tribes for the sovereignty of Spain. So they held a
council at Breogan's Tower, near Corunna, to determine what
country they should invade. It was resolved to send Ith to
reconnoitre the island of Erin ; not, as some assert, because he
had seen it like a white cloud on a winter's night from the top
of Breogan's Tower. The position of the island was well
known to the inhabitants of Spain ; and there was trading
between the two countries. Ith then sailed to Erin with 150
men, and landed in the north, where some of the country-folk
came to meet him — and accosted him in the Scot-bearla, or
Gaelic. He answered them in the same tongue. They told
him that the three sons of Kermad Milbeol (of the honey
tongue), the son of the Dagda, ruled the land year about in
turn, and kept court at Aileach.
Thither went Ith thereupon, and was received by the
kings with the "thousand welcomes." He was loud in his
praises of the great fertility of the soil : abounding in honey,
and in fruit, and in fish, and in milk, and in vegetables, and
in corn, whilst the air was of so pleasant a temperature —
between heat and cold. This aroused the suspicions of the
kings. They feared that if he was allowed to depart in safety
he would come back with a large army. On his way to the
shore he was waylaid and attacked, and borne to his ship
mortally wounded. He died at sea, on his voyage back to
40 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Spain. To avenge his death, and seize Erin, the sons of
Golamh mustered a fleet of thirty ships, in each of which
there were thirty men, and sailed for Erin. On making land
at Inver Slainge (Wexford) the Dedananns threw a magic
mist around them, and with spells drove them away from the
shore. They then sailed along the south of the island, and
landed at Inver Sceine (Kenmare Bay), whence they marched
to Slieve Mish, in Kerry. Here they were met by one of the
three queens. Amergin, asked her name. "Banba is my
name," replied she, " and from me the island is called Banba."
They then marched to Slieve Eiblinn (Phelim) in Limerick,
and met Fodhla, another queen. Amergin asked her her
name. " My name is Fodhla," replied she, " and from me the
island is called Fodhla." They then marched to Uisneach,
and met Eri. Amergin asked her her name. " My name is
Eri," replied she, " and from me the island is called Eri ; the
queen of the king for the year gives her name to the king-
dom." They then marched to Tara, where they met the three
kings, and demanded battle or the kingdom. The kings
objected, but agreed to leave the matter to the decision of
Amergin, the son of Golamh, adding, that if he pronounced
an unjust judgment they would kill him with magic. He
decided that the Gael should retire to the coast, and set out
nine waves to sea ; and then, if they could effect a landing
in spite of the Dedananns, they should possess the land. The
Gael then retired, and went out beyond the tenth wave,
when the foe raised a tempest by magic and dispersed
their fleet. There were eight sons of Golamh on board
these ships. All but three, Eber, Eremon, and Amergin,
perished.
rive of these sons were sunk in the wave,
Five of the stalwarth sons of Golamh,
In song loving Eri's spacious bays,
Thro' Danann wiles and Druidic spells.
Eber landed with the crews of his ships in Kerry, and
fought a battle at Slieve Mis, near Tralee, and routed the
enemy. Scota, the wife of Golamh, was amongst the slain.
She was buried in the valley of Glen Scoithen, near the scene
of the battle, where her tomb is still pointed out. A second
THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 41
and decisive battle was shortly afterwards fought at Tailtin in
Meath, in which Banba, Fodhla, and Eri, with their husbands,
were slain, and the Dananns almost annihilated.
Fodhla was slain by the boastful Etan,
Banba was slain by the victoi", Caicher,
Eri, the bounteous, fell by Surghi,
Of these famed heroines such was the dire doom.
Eber and Eremon then assumed the joint sovereignty of
the island, and divided it between them, Eremon taking the
northern half. Next year they quarrelled and fought a battle
near Geashill, in the King's County, in which Eber was
defeated and slain. Eremon then became sole king, and
reigned fourteen years. This was the taking of Erin by the
Gael.i
The pedigrees of the Gael are all traced up to one or other
of the three sons of Golamh, i.e., Eber, Eremon, and Ir, or to
Lugaid, the son of Ith, his nephew ; or to vary the statement,
so as to bring it nearer to the probable, under these eponymi
were arranged all the several tribes and families who, in the
opinion of the annalist, constituted the Gael of Erin. As
regards the previous history of the Gael, the synchronists and
the etymologists revel in supplying us with facts. Finius
Farsa, fourth in descent from Japhet, was king of Syria, and
kept a great school for teaching languages, as did his son
Niall, the father of Gaedal Glas, from whom the Gael are
named. Nial and Gaedal Glas met Aaron and Moses in Egypt.
Moses healed Gaedal from the bite of a serpent. Eber Scot
was the great grandson of Gaedal Glas, and the opinion of
antiquaries was divided as to whether the Gael were called
Scots from him, or because they came from Scythia. The
etymologists could not, of course, resist the temptation of
1
1
1 Breogan
Bile
1
Golamh— Scota
Ith
i
Lugaid
1
1
Eber Finn
(the Fair)
2
Eremon
1
3
Amergia
1
4
It (drowned)
Heber
Breogan 23td in descent from Japhet !
42
EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
allesfing: that the Gael were called the " Cinead Scuit "
(Scots) because they came from Scit-ena (Scythia).-
What race of men were the Gael ? Anthropologists sa}''
that hereditary tj^pes constitute a race, and that traits are
associated to form these types. Ripley, following the majority
of anthropologists, makes a three-fold division of the races of
Europe into Teutonic, Alpine or Celtic, and Mediterranean.
Deniker differs from all others in combining his three separate
physical traits into six principal races and four or more sub-
races. This, however, is a difference of method of classification
rather than one of substance, and the three-fold classification,
as set forth in the subjoined table, is convenient and adequate
for our purpose.^
European Racial Types.*
Head.
Face.
Hair.
Eyes.
Stature.
Nose.
1. Xordic or
Teutonic.
Long
Long
Very light
Blue
Tall
AquiUne
2. Alpine or
Celtic.
Round
Broad
Light
chestnut
Hazel
grey
Medium,
Stocky
Variable,
rather
broad,
heavy
3. Mediterranean
Long
Long
Dark brown
or black
Dark
Medium,
Slender
Rather
broad
This table shows the combination of traits into racial types.
It speaks for itself.
The Gael were not Celts. " Whatever be," says Ripley,
" the state of opinion among students of other cognate sciences,
there is practically to-day a complete unanimity of opinion
among physical anthropologists that the term Gelt, if used at
all, belongs to the second of our three races, viz. — the broad-
headed (brachycephalic), darkish population of the Alpine
Highlands. Such is the view of Broca, Bertrand, Topinard,
CoUignon, and all the French authorities. It is accepted by
" In the Gaelic tongue gAel meant kindred. The Cymri (combrox) meant
compatriots. May gAinet and gAel be connected ? The obvious is some-
time unseen by the eye that is searching for the obscure.
^ Ripley, Appendix, D., p. 507.
* See Ripley, W. " The Races of Europe," p. 121. Nordic is the term used
by Deniker. The Alpine race includes the Celtic wedge which split the Volcae
into two divisions and passed westwards to the Channel between the quadriia*
teral of Lug. as described in the first chapter.
THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 43
the Germans, Virchow, KoUmann and Ranke, as Xvell ; by the
English (foremost among them by Dr. Beddoe), and by the
most competent Italians." ^ Prior to 1860, the leading ethno-
logists asfreed, in deference to classical texts, in affiliating the
Celts of early history with the tall, blonde peoples of Northern
Europe— the Nordic race of Deniker. Subsequent investiga-
tions have shown the fallacy of this, but the terms "Celtic
race " still linger around the Gael, who were most indubitably
part and parcel of the tall, blonde, long-headed Nordic race.
Tacitus, who is, no doubt, recording the observation and in-
ferences of his father-in-law, Agricola, tells us that when
Agricola came as Governor to Britain in A.D. 78, the Brigantes,
who had been in a great measure reduced to subjection, occu-
pied the territory between the Humber and the Clyde, We
have seen that a tribe bearing the same name is mentioned
by Ptolemy as located in the south-east of lerne, and the
fugitive chief entertained by Agricola, as we have already
mentioned, may have belonged to that tribe and taken refuge
with his namesakes in North Britain. Agricola had also con-
ducted a campaign against the Silures in Wales, and had
previously seen much active service in Britain in subordinate
commands. The statements of Tacitus are, therefore, entitled
to great weight. He says : — " For instance, the ruddy hair
and larcre limbs of the inhabitants of Caledonia demonstrate
their German origin. The dark faces of the Silures (in South
Wales and Monmouthshire), their generally curly hair, and
the fact that Spain lies opposite to them, make one believe that
the Spaniards of old times passed over and occupied these
parts. The Britons, who are nearest to the Gauls, are also
like them." ^
Boadicea or Boudicca, Queen of the Iceni (Norfolk and
Suffolk), bears a Latin name that comes very close in sound to
Boadach or Buadach, often found as an epithet of Gaelic
warriors, and meaning victorious. Dion Casseus describes her
as follows : — " She was of large size, terrible of aspect, savage
of countenance, harsh of voice, with a profusion of flowing
" Riple}', 126.
^ Jsamque rutilae Calodoniam habitantiura comae, magni artus Germanicam
originem adseverant. Silurum colorati vultus, torti plerumque criues. Agricola,
c. 11.
44 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
yellow hair, which fell down to her hips , a large golden collar
on her neck, a variegated flowing vest drawn close about her
bosom, and a thick mantle fastened by a clasp or brooch, and
a spear in her hand." '^
A companion picture is to be found in Queen Meve of
Connact, her predecessor in time by, perhaps, a century. She
is thus described in the Tain : — " A beautiful pale, long-faced
woman, with long flowing golden yellow hair, upon her a
crimson cloak, fastened with a brooch of gold over her breast,
a straight ridged slegh or light spear blazing red in her hand."
This was the ideal as well as the real type of beauty with
the file's who composed the sagas. Edain, daughter of Etar, a
Dedanann chief, " had two golden yellow tresses on her head,
each of them plaited with four locks or strands, and a ball of
gold on the point of each tress. The colour of that hair was
like the flowers of the bog firs in summer, or like red gold
immediately after receiving its coining." Cuculainn had yellow
hair and blue eyes. In the description of the Gaelic chieftains
by MacRoth in the Tain, nearly all are described as having
yellow hair, and the men of Muirtheimne 3,000 blood red
furious warriors, had " long, fair, yellow hair, and splendid
bright countenances ! " Some of the chieftains, however, are
described as having black hair, which was not then held in
dis-esteem as MacFirbis represents in later times.
" On the authority of old sayings of people learned in
history," MacFirbis writes : — " The dark, the loud voiced, the
contumelious, the talkative, the vociferous, the fierce, the
unteachable, the slave, the liar, the churlish, and all who
listen not to music or melody, the violators of covenants and
laws, and the accusers of all are the descendants of the
Firvolg, the Gaillians, the Liogmuine, and the Fir-Domnan ;
but mostly of the Firvolg ut dictum." If MacFirbis had
weighed the evidence contained in our texts instead of listen-
ing to the " old sayings " of other folk, he would have
corrected the ignorance of those old people.
Some of the bravest soldiers came from the stock of the
Firvolce. Ferdiad was a Roland if Cuchulain was an Oliver.
' buAix), victory, = bu-oi boAt)4c or boAT)<i5 = victorious. Muellenhofi has
trrced the presence of the Celtic tongue east of the Weser, and the Iceni,
immigrating from the continent opposite, probably spoke Celtic of the Gaelic
type. Deutsche Alterthumskunde, vol. II., map, Table I.
THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 45
The Clanna Morna were as brave as the Clanna Baoiscne,
better known as the Fianna of Finn, the son of Cumhal (Cool)
and the grandson of Baoiscne (Bweesh-cne). Nor were black
hair and blue eyes an obstacle to success in other fields of
rivalry, Naoise (Neesh-e) was seen and loved by the cloistered
Deirdre, and Diarmaid O'Duibhne carried oft" King Cormac's
daughter from the betrothal feast of the implacable Finn
himself.
Conaire Mor (100 B.C.) had curly yellow locks, and black
pupils in blue eyes. Nial of the Nine Hostages mounted the
enchanted stone at Tara in the year 370 A.D.
" Yellow as the Sobarche (St. John's Wort) was the yellow
hair which was on the head of the son of Cairen," a Saxon
aditionelle of the Ard Righ ; his " one wife " being Mongfinn,^
also a fair-haired lady, as the name indicates. From this time,
it may be safely asserted that there was not a single Gaelic
family without " ruadh," or red hair figuring constantly in its
pedigree. The " dubh," or black-haired, were also conspicuous
owing to the intermarriages between the Gael and the
Firvolce. There were many "ingeAnA -ouitie" besides the
Scotch lassie (ineen duv) who was wedded to Red Hugh
O'DonnelL
Giraldus Cambrensis, who visited Ireland at the close of
the 12th century, and spent two years there, says : " The men
were majestic, but the other animals were small. The men
were very tall and handsome of body, with ruddy com-
plexions." ^
The type is well exemplified in the portrait of Eoghan
Ruadh O'Neill by the celebrated Dutch artist, Brugens. The
colour of the hair is not decidedly red in the picture but
approaching to it. It was painted whilst he was serving in
Flanders, probably about the time he defended Arras, 1640, in
command of an Irish regiment in the Spanish service, where
he showed the characteristics attributed by Spenser to his
fellow-countrymen : " Circumspect in their enterprises, very
present in perils, great scorners of death." * These be the
^ tnons, hair, and pinn, fair.
® " Solis liominibus suam retenentibns majestatem— pulcherrimis et proceris
corporibus coloratissimis vultibus." An engraving of it will be found in the
Ulster Journal of ArchiEology, vol. iv.
46 EARLY IRISH HISTORT.
men,' writes St. Leger to Henry VIIL, 'that don't lightly
abandon the field, but bide the brunt to the death.' "
Fynes Moryson says the cattle in Ireland were very little,
" and only the men and the greyhounds of any great stature."
Dyinoke says, at the end of the 16th century, " Of complexion
the Irish are clear and well favoured, both men and women
tall and corpulent {i.e., with large frames) bodies." O'Donovan
collected many accounts of Irish giants. Amongst them
were, I may mention, Morgan Kavanagh, Governor of
Prague, in 1766, said to be the tallest man in Europe.
His relatives were described by Professor Neimann, of
Vienna, in 1844, as the tallest men in Germany. The
O'Dowdas of Hy Fiachra " counted 24 castles on their exten-
sive estate, many of which are still in existence, and they
have a burial place appropriated to them in the Abbey of
Moyne, where may be seen the gigantic bones of some of them,
who have been remarkable for their great stature, one of them
having exceeded seven feet in height. One of the family,
William O'Driscoll, who died in 1851, is described as being in
pitch of body like a giant. O'Donovan refers also to Big
Magratb, whose skeleton is now in Trinity College, Dublin ;
to Florence Macarthy," taller by a head and shoulders than his
fellows.^"
We must not omit here a story from Holinshed. The
Irishmen would never give quarter, and therefore whenever
the Frenchmen took any of them they gelded them, and other-
wise tormented them. After the surrender of Bulloign
(Boulogne) (1544 a.d.), a large Frenchman on the other side of
the haven braved and deried the English army, whereupon
one Nicholas (Irish) did swim over the river and cut off the
Frenchman's head, and brought it back over the river in his
mouth, for which bold action he was bountifully rewarded."
As to light hair and light eyes, the proportions per cent., as
o-iven by the Anthropometric Committee for 1892-3, are
" Ireland, 47.4 ; Scotland, 46.3 ; England, 40.1 ; Wales, 34.60."
The figures for Ireland, of course, take in the whole popula-
tion, comprising many ethnic elements besides the Gaelic, e.g.,
1° O'Donovan, Physical Characteristics of the Ancient Irish. — Ulst. Jour.
Arch?e., vol. vi., p. 101.
" Holinshed's Chronicle., I. 103. Cox Hist. Anglie, p. 277.
THE COMING OF THE GAEL. 47
the Firvolce " and the dark-haired admixture from England,
with concave noses in many cases." ^"'
A distinctive feature of the Teutonic or Nordic race is its
prominent or narrow nose. The association of tall stature
with a narrow nose is so close as to point to a law. From the
north of Europe, as we go south, the nose becomes flatter and
more open at the wings. As regards the Irish, Beddoe writes :
" The concave noses are far from being as common as is sup-
posed. The really predominant form is the long, sinuous, and
prominent, especially at the point. In Ireland, and in East
and North England, the concave nose is only 18 per cent.,
while in Gloucestershire and in Denmark it is 20, and in
Sweden, 26 per cent," ^^
Deniker says — The mean height of the races of Europe is
never low ; on the other hand the races of great stature are
numerous. In some districts, especially in Bosnia, in Scot-
land, and in Ireland, it reaches m. 1*72, or even the incredible
figure of m. 1'76, m. 178 in the counties of Perth and Berwick ;
and in Galloway the maximum of humanity. i* Galloway is
an extensive district in the south-west of Scotland, 70 miles
long by 40 broad, comprised mainly in Wigtonshire. It owes
its name to the fact that the inhabitants were called GoU-Gael
or foreign Gael, a name equivalent to our " Sea-divided Gael,"
and applicable to the Gaelic Septs in Alba and the Hebrides.
Of the physical traits which betoken race, the head form
is the most permanent. Pigmentation and stature are less
reliable. The head form is ascertained by expressing the
breadth in per-centage of the length from front to back. This
is called the Cephalic index.^^ In Deniker' s list of Cephalic
12 See •' The Irish People, their Height, Form, and Strength." E. Hogan,
S.J., 1897.
" Beddoe " Races of Britain," 236. Mem. Anthrop. Soc, vol. iii., 238.
" Deniker" L'Anthropologie," 1898, vol. ix., 122. " Lss Races de I'Europe,''
Note preliminaire.
1^ The general form of the skull or brain case is oval, but may be
modified so as to become round and broad, or elongated and elliptical. These
changes of form are indicated by the Cephalic or cranial index. The Cephalio
index is ascertained by multipljdng the breadth by 100 and dividing by the
leafth, and two units are allowed for the difference between a bare skull and
one' with flesh and muscle. Retzius divided these skulls into long heafls and
broad heads. The former (dolichocephalic) where the index figure reached 79
inclusive, and all above that figure were classed as broadheads (brachycephalic).
There are also sub -divisions or modifications of this system which do not require
notice here.
48 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
indices, the Scotch Gael (Highlanders) head the list of long-
heads at 76'3. The Irish, however, run them very close at
77*3, which figure an average taken from a greater number of
the population would probably modify. The Gael thus fulfil
all the conditions he lays down for membership of the great
Nordic race, of which the following is an abridged summary j
The Nordic race is blonde, long-headed, of gfeat height. "We may
call it the Nordic, because its representatives are grouped almost ex-
clusively in the north of Europe. Its permanent traits or characteristics
are the following : — It is very tall (average m. 1 -73). The hair is blonde
or often reddish (roussatres), the eyes clear, mostly blue, the head long,
dolichocephalic (index on living from 76 to 79), the skin white-rosy, the
face long, with nose prominent and straight.
In this division he includes the Irish, except the inhabi-
tants of the north-west of the island. It must be always borne
in mind that in applying the results yielded by the statistical
inquiries of anthropologists at the present day to the past,
account must be taken of historical considerations. Fortune
has dealt hard measure to the Gael. The greatness of the race
is now attested by its ruius.^^
1® Deniker, ubi, supra, 123.
[ 49 ]
CHAPTER IV.
The Gael.
IN prehistoric as well as in historic times there have been
periods of overflow from the Nordic populations to the
South. This is traced in Germany in the Row Graves
(Reihengraber) where the Nordic longheads are found buried
side by side with their heads facing the rising sun. It is also
traced far into France, where the older races are to be found
in isolated areas of disfavour, mountainous, unfertile, or other-
wise undesirable. Moreover, it was not by land only that this
overflow took place. The emigrants went also by sea to found
new homes in distant parts, and have left traces along the
coast of France and around the mouths of the Loire. Notable
amongst these were the Veneti whose confederation occupied
the country around Vannes, the capital of Morbihan, on the
south coast of Brittany. Caesar wrote that he exterminated
them, put the whole senate to death, and sold the rest into
slavery. This, however, was not the case. Their race charac-
teristics still remain to prove that it is easier to conquer than
to exterminate. Morbihan is one of the ''blondest" depart-
ments in France. Not much further south across the Bay of
Biscay lay Brigantium, near Corunna, on an island adjacent to
which was a great light-house mentioned by Orosius, fabled in
aftertime to have been Breogan's Tower. There was also
Brigantium (Briangon) in the Hautes Alpes and Brigantium
(Bregenz), near Lake Constance. And we have seen that the
Brigantes held the country between the Humber and the
Clyde, and were planted in the South-east of Ireland. There
is, therefore, no inherent improbability in the statement in our
texts that the first coming of the Gael was from the North of
Spain. They came as the allies, probably at the invitation, of
the Firvolce to aid them to shake otF the yoke of the
Dedananns. It was in substance a rehearsal of the drama
played 2,000 years afterwards by another section of the Nordic
race — the Jutes, the Saxons, and the Angles^
E
50 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
The expansion of the Nordic race on the Continent was
slow. It proceeded step by step — by infiltration, pressure and
fighting. We do not propose to give details here, nor to open
up the Celtic question which is enshrined in a voluminous
literature. We shall confine ourselves to stating that the Celts
were a powerful, valiant, and imperial race, and during the '
Hallstadt period stood in the forefront of civilisation and
progress. Now Hallstadt was a great Celtic capital and em-
porium of trade in Upper Austria. In the tombs, over 1,000
in number, were found the most beautiful specimens of the
industrial art of the period. This civilisation is characterised
by the presence of iron employed largely in the manufacture
of weapons. Bronze, however, was still predominant at first,
and was gradually superseded by iron. Vases in bronze of a
beautiful type, brooches, necklets, bracelets, and trinkets in
gold abound. Ivory from Africa was used for the pommels of
swords ; glass was used to make small vases. A large trade
was done in amber from the Baltic for which the rich
products of the Mediterranean cities were given in exchange.
There was no silver or coined money found in the tombs.
Montelius, according to his latest views, places the age of
bronze in France and other Celtic nations between 2,000 and
850 B.C., and the Hallstadt period between 850 and 600 B.C.^
The advance of the Celts was triumphant. It is written in
history, and cannot be reasonably doubted that they seized
Galatia ; spared Delphi ; held Rome to ransom, and took
possession of the fairest regions of Europe— the valleys of the
Po, the Danube, the Loire, the Marne, and the Seine. They
stopped at the Channel. The charms of Britain could not
entice them to cross the narrow strait, and Erin had little to
attract and much to terrify a people who, unlike the Nordic
race, had never faced the perils of the sea, except whilst they
were crossing the Crimean Bosphorus. The immigration of
the Firvolce from the South was, as we have seen, by relays
under various sub-denominations, The Nordic immigration
was also gradual by relays of immigrants of the same stock.
If we go forward 1000 years to the time of Cimbaeth — from
1700 to 750 B.C.— how do we find the Eponymi placed on the
land ? The clan of Lugaid, the son of Ith, who was the first
* L'anthopologie, xii., 620.
THE GAEL. 51
leader of the immigration to land in Erin, was located on the
verge of the Southern Ocean, in Corca Luighe, a small
territory lying between Kinsale and Bantry Bay. North of
this lay the territory of the clan of Eber the Fair, the elder
brother of Eremon. Next came Eremon. And finally, in the
north-east, we find a nephew — Heber, the son of Ir. Leinster
was occupied by the Gailleoin, a tribe of the Firvolce.
Connacht was also occupied by other sub-denominations of
Firvolce, notably by Firdomhnann and the Cathraige. Our
texts contain no record of any struggle in which the clan of
Ith was driven into an area of isolation and disfavour by a
body of immigrants advancing from the North, as the
O'Sullivans in after times were driven from the Golden Vein
of Tipperary into the same region. The fate of the clan ol
Eber the Fair was decided at the battle of Geashill, near the
Esker Riada, in the King's County. This is a long ridge of
gravel hills, probably the moraine of a confluent glacier,
which stretches from Dublin to Clarin Bridge, on Galway Bay,
and is referred to frequently in our texts, as the dividing line
between North and South, Conn's Half (ieAt Cuinn), and
Eogan's Half (te At rhoj^). From this time the clan of Ir and
the clan of Eremon stand face to face in fierce antagonism,
fighting for the hegemony. The struggle lasted for 800 years,
and ended in 332 A.D., with the victory of the three Collas
and the destruction of Emania, leaving the clan of Eremon
not, indeed, absolute masters, but unquestionably the
predominant power in Erin, and destined, apparently, in due
process of social and political evolution to fuse into a nation
the various ethnic elements under their sway, who now spoke
the same language, shared in the same superstitions, and were
known by a common name— the Gael.
Before presenting our readers with some figures relating to
the period between 1700 and 750 B.C., we may state that we
follow the chronology and figures found in the " Annals of the
Kingdom of Erin " by the Four Masters, which were written
between January, 1632, and August, 1636. These Annals are
sometimes referred to as a compilation which at the present
day is generally understood to mean "scissors and paste "
work. Their task, however, was of a different character.
" Eminent masters in antiquarian lore," as Colgan describes
52 EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
tliem, they collected, as best they could, all the texts that
could be procured in their time. They then examined them,
compared them, criticised them, weighed the evidence, and
delivered their judgments in the most valuable work which
has come down to us in the Gaelic tongue. The Four
Masters, following the Septuagint, present, on the whole, a
more coherent and intelligible view than the annalists who
adopt other systems. The distribution of time — the dates
assigned to particular events — is largely regulated by the
system of chronology adopted, and nothing but confusion can
arise if the historian passes from one system to another.
Moreover, we do not present the dates we now offer as reliable,
and it is only by a very liberal construction of the terms that
the dates B.C. may, perhaps, be called rough approximations.
The struggle between the tribes of Eremon, Eber the Fair,
and Heber, the son of Ir, was long and obstinately fought.
Though the race of Eber the Fair lost the battle of Geashill,
they continued strong and powerful. According to the Four
Masters, 53 kings reigned at Tara, counting joint reigns as
one, from the coming of the Gael (1700 B.C.), to the alternate
reigns of Aed Ruad, Dithorba, and Cimbaeth (730 B.C.), a
period of 970 years. This period is distributable approximately
as follows : —
PERIOD I.
1700 B.C. TO 970 B.C.
Kings.
Line of.
Years of Reiga.
17
Eremon
438*
21
Eber the Fair
236
13
Ir
267
2
Ith
6
(Interregmim of 7 years
and
broken years)
23
Total, 53 — Total, 970
We add, for comparison, Periods II, and III.
PERIOD II.
From the accession of Aed Ruad (730 B.C.) to A.D. 1, there
were 37 High-Kings.
*In this figure is reckoned the reign of Siorna Saoglach (the long-lived) for
150 } ears. Suggestions to account lor this need not detain us here.
THE GAEL. 53
Kin^s. Line of. Years of Reign.
23 Eremon 459
8 Eber the Fair 82
5 & Macha (Queen) Ir 189
0 Ith 0
Total, 35 Total, 730
PERIOD III.
From A.D. 1, to the coming of St. Patrick (432) there were 27
nigh-Kings.
Kings.
20
1
3
2
i
Line of.
Eremon
Eber the Fair
Ir
Ith
Cairbre Cinnceat
Years of Reign.
248
J3
25
31
5
Total, 27
PERIOD lY.
Total;
322
From St. Patrick to Brian Boru (1002, A.D.) all were of the line
of Eremon, with one or possibly two exceptions.
The " Annals of the Four Masters " during our first and
second periods, are in the main confined to giving the name of
each of the High Kings, the date of his accession, the length
of his reign, and the manner of his death. A list containing
the name, line and date of accession of each Ardrigh will
be found in the Appendix. The bursting out of lakes, and
the cutting down of woods, are also noticed in great detail.
So also the innumerable battles which recur with the periodi-
city of astronomical events. More interesting events are also
but very rarely noticed at some length. We shall give a feAV
examples generally, in the words of the authors as translated
by O'Donovan in his invaluable work, slightly abridged :
A.M. 3502 (1698, B.C.), Tea, the daughter of Lugaid, the son of
Ith, whom Eremon brought home {i.e., married) in Spain over the
head of Odba, requested of Eremon as her bride gift (cmrciM) a
choice hill as she might select to be buried there. She selected
Drum-Caoin, and from her it was called Tara.2
2 This is one of the nsual etymologies. It is more likely, we think, that it
was called •Oiiuitn C15 inoiri after the King's " great house " was built. After
a time th^se words would be treated as one word, CemAiti, and the last
syllable shoitened and elided with the genitive Cervi(Ai)tiAc.
64« EARLY lEISH HISTORY.
There were other Taras in Erin, all, we believe, residential,
and occupied by chieftains. The houses were, no doubt, built
in imitation of the King's "great house," — like Bricrin's
Mansion in Dun Rudraighe, near Lough-Brickland, in Down.
" It must be remembered," writes Joyce, " that a Teamhair
was a residence, and that all the Teamhairs had originally
one or more forts, which, in case of many of them, remain to
this day." 3
A.M. 3580 (1620 B.C.) This was the seventeenth year above three
score, of Tighernmas, as King over Erin. It was by him the following
battles were gained over the race of Eber — the battle of Ele (Antrim),
the battle of Loclnnagh, the battle of Cuilard, in Magh Innis (Down) ;
the battle of Cuil Fraechen, the battle of Magh Fecht, the battle of
Commar, the battle of Cul-athguirt, in Seimhne, (Island Magee) ; the
battle of Ard Neadh (Connacht) ; the battle of Carn Feradagh
(Limerick) ; the battle of Cnamh Choill (Connacht) ; the battle of
Ouil Feadha, the battle of Eeabh, the battle of Congnaidhe, in Tuath
Eabha (Sligo) ; the battle of Cluan Cuaa in Teatlibha (Teffia) ; the
battle ot Cluan Muirsge (Breffny) ; the two battles of Cuil, in Arget
Boss (Kilkenny) ; the battle of Ele, the battle of Berra (Cork) ; seven
battles at Lough Lughdhach (Lough Carrane, Kerry) ; two other
battles at Arget Ross (Kilkenny) ; three battles against the Firvolce
and the battle of Cuil Fobhair, against the Ernai (in Tyrone).
We give the foregoing details, not to enumerate the vic-
tories of Tighernmas, but as a specimen of the class of entries
in the Annals which are very numerous, to show the tradition
as to the social state of Erin in those days. We have no clue
to the casus belli in any case or to the results which folio Aved
from these victories. If it be founded on fact, the record
reveals to us the picture of a very active monarch, continually
at war, striking blows with effect, north, south, east, and west,
which, however, bore no permanent results.
The conclusion of this entry is more interesting.
" It was by Tighernmas that gold was first smelted in Erin, in
Foithre Airthir Lilie (east of the Litley). It was by an artiilcer of the
Fera-Cualann (Wickiow). It was by Tighernmas that goblet.s and
brooches were first covered with gold and silver in Erin. It was by
him that clothes were dyed purple, blue, and green. It was in his
rei"n that the three black rivers of Erin burst forth. At the end of
this year he died, with three quarters of the men of Erin about him, at
the meeting of Magh Slecht, in Breifne, at the worshipping of Crom
Cruach, which was the chief idol of adoration in Ei'in. This happened
on the eve of Samliain (Hallow Eve) precisely. It was from the
genuflections that the men of Erin made about Tighernmas that the
plain was named."
^Joyce's Irish Plaice Names, First Series, 2S3.
THE GAEL. 55
The statement in the ilnnals is, probably, taken from the
versified Dindshenchus, of Magh Slecht, in the Book of Leinster,
of which "we give a few staves, translated by Kuno Meyer as
follows : —
There came
Tighernmas, the Princa of Tara, yonder
On Hallowe'en with many hosts
A cause of grief to them was the deed.
They did evil ;
They beat tlieir palms ; they pounded their bodies,
"Wailing to the demon who enslaved them.
They shed falling showers of tears
Around Crom Cruach ;
There the hosts would prostrate themselves,
Though he put them under deadly disgi'ace,
Their name clings to the noble plain,
Except one-fourth of the keen Gaels
Not a man alive . . .
Escaped without death in his mouth.
The prose Dindshenchus being more modern than the verse,
has, as usual, further particulars. We quote from Stokes'
translation in the Revue Celtique of the Rennes text :
"And they all prostrated before him (i.e., Crom Chroic), so
that the tops of their foreheads and the gristle of their noses
and the caps ol their knees and the ends of their elbows broke,
and three-quarters of the men of Erin perished at these
prostrations. Whence Magslecht, ' Plain of Prostration.' " *
It is more likely, we think, that the plain was named from the
C<sim f leciic or plague stroke. Slecht,^ in the sense of genu-
flection, or prostration, is connected, probably, with " fiecto,"
and is post-Christian. Its older sense was to cut down, and
the cutting off of a large part of the population was more
likely to give a name to the plain than the supposed genuflec-
tions or prostrations. There is no mention of child sacrifice in
either the versified or prose Dindshenchus on this occasion.
But we may feel sure that Tighernmas and the men of Erin,
if they approached Crom Cruach as suppliants for help, brought
with them as the usage was, gifts more appetising and accept-
able than prostrations, tears, and genuflections.
The nucleus of this legend must be sought in the genuine
tradition that the African Fomorians exacted, as we have
* Revue Celtique, xvi., 53. 'Stijim — Windisch Worierbnch.
56 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
already stated, a tribute of children from the Firvolce, to be
delivered every Hallowe'en between the rivers Drobhaois and
Erne. This tithe or fixed proportion of all kinds of produce
was a Phoenician usage, and was paid annually by Carthage to
the mother city in Asia, and there can be very little doubt
that some of these little children were sacrificed to Melkarth
accordins: to the Carthajfinian ritual. The district of Masrh
Siecht was not occupied by the Gael. The Four Masters state
expressly that it was in the possession of the " Sen Tuatha " — ■
the old tribes — who may have been a colony of these
Fomorians dwelling in an area of isolation. It was by them
the Masraidhe that Conall Gulban was killed in A.D. 464.
Moreover, this statement of the prostration of the men of Erin
around Tighernmas may well be doubted. Giolla Coeman,
+ 1070, in " Erin Ard," refers to the death of Tighernmas and
a slaughter of thousands by the plague, and says nothing
about Magh Slecht or Crom Cruach, and Cormac MacCuiienain
( + 908) says nothing about it where we should expect to find
a reference to it. We find the following in the glossary : —
" Teamleuchta, i.e., Tamshleacta, i.e., a plague that cut otf the
people in that place, i.e., in a great mortality, during which
the people used to go into the plains that they might be in
one place before death, because of their burial by those whom
the mortality did not carry off; and Teamleachta (plague-
grave) nencupatur." The story in the Book of Leinster is,
we think, a subsequent addition, afterwards, as is usually the
case, equipped with copious and minute details in the prose
Dindshenchus. If, however, we were to admit the truth of
the story told about the prostration of Tighernmas, there is
no reason for holding that Crom Cruach became the chief idol
of Erin. If he became the national god he would not have
been called persistently Crom Cruach (Bloody Crom), and he
would have been installed, with a well-endowed priesthood,
at Tara, and Tlachtga, Tailtin and Usnach. This was not so.
The god elements proved decisively by the terrible mortality
that they were mightier than Crom, that their power was
greater, their protection more valuable, and, above all, that
their anger was more to be feared.
A.M. 3664. This was the first year of Eocaid Edghadhach as kina
over Erin. He was called Eocaid Edghadhach beciuise it was by hin
THE GAEL. 57
that variety of colour was first put on clothes in Erin to distinguish the
honour of each by his raiment, from the lowes4; to the highest. Thus
was the distinction made between them — one colour in the clothes of
slaves, two in the clothes of soldiers, three in the clothes of goodly
heroes or young lords of territories (lords' sons ?), [four in the clothes
of hospital] ei's, five in the clothes of lords] of territories, six in the
clothes of ollavs, seven in the clothes of kings and queens.^
A,M. 3922. OUamh Fodhla (OUav Fola). Eocaid was his firsf,
name, and he was called Ollamh Fodhla because he was first a. learned
Ollamb, and afterwards King of Fodhla, i.e., Erin.
Gilla Caomain calls him " King of the Learned " in
" Yellow-haired " Erin. The Annals of Clonmacnoise, which
have reached us only in Mageoghan's trasnlation, state : —
He was the first king of the land that ever kept the great feast at
Tara, called Feis Tarach, which feast was kept once a year, whereunto
all the king's friends and dutiful subjects came yearly, and such as
came not were taken for the king's enemies and to be prosecuted by
the law and the sword as undutiful to the State. This king was so
well learned and so much given to the favour of learning that he
builded a fair palace at Tai-a only for the learned sort of the realm to
dwell in, at his own peculiar cost and charges, of whom he was so much
again beloved and reverenced that ever after his house, stock, and
family were by them in their rhymes and })oems preferred before any
others of their equals of the Irish nation. Six of his children succeeded
him, one after another, as kings of this land, without any other coming
betwixt them, which good never happened to no other before him. He
died at Tara a famous king— rich, learned, wise, and generally well-
beloved of all men, and reigned forty years.''
Ollamh Fodhla was of the line of Ir, and he was succeeded,
as stated, by six of that race in succession.
A.M. 4020, B.C. 1180. This was the first year of Sirna, son of
Dian. It was he wrested the government of Tara from the Ulta, i.e.,
the race of Ir. An attack was made by him on the Fomorians in the
territory of Meath. It was by him, moreover, was fought the battle of
!Moin Troghaidhe, in Ciannachta (in Meath 1). When Lugair, the son
of Lugaida, of the race of Eber, brought in a force of Fomorians into
Erin with their king, Ceasarn by name, Sirna drew the men of Erin to
make battle against them at Moin Troghaidhe. As they were fighting
a plague was sent upon them, of which Lugair and Ceasarn perished,
with their peonle, and a countless number of the men of Erin with
them. Sirna Saoghlach (the long-lived) reigned 150 years.
^ The law was known as the " Ill-brccta." It will be observed that there
is no mention herp of Druids or paeiau priests. The words in brackets are from
the Gaelic text. They are omitted by inadvertence from O'Donovans translalioa.
' Murphy, S.J., Ann. Clon. (Mageoghaa) 34.
58 EARLY HUSH HISTORY.
This patriarclial figure is, probably, an effort of clironology,
to bring tlie system of the Four Masters into harmony with
the Domestic Annals from which the lists of the High-Kings
were taken. Gilla Caomain, who followed the Hebrew reckon-
ing, says : — " Sirna held the reigns of power for thrice seven
noble years."
A study of the figures given above in our first and second
periods will reveal the steady progress of the line of Eremon.
At the commencement of the second period the race of Eber
was beaten. The contest thenceforth lay between the Irians
(Clanna Rury) and the Eremonians. Emhain (Emania) was
the capital of the Irians. It is now known as Navan Fort, and
is situated about two miles west of Armagh. The area of it
was about twelve acres. It was elliptical in shape, and sur-
rounded by a fosse twenty or thirty feet deep, and a high
embankment. Within this space is an elevated spot, somewhat
removed from the centre, on which the central dun, a dun
within a dun, is supposed to have stood. The foundation of
Emania is assigned by the Four Masters to Macha of the Red-
hair during the period between 660 and 653 B.C. Tighernach,
who followed the Hebrew reckoning, assigned it to the year
307 B.C. M. D'Arbois visited the place in 1881, and has given
an admirable description and plan of it in the Revue Geltique
(xiv., p. 1). Ho observes that " Some persons will think the
dimensions of Navan Fort modest, but the great banquetting
hall, called the ' Craobh Ruadh ' appears to have been situated
outside the fortress. The name is preserved in the townland
of Creeve Roe, and on an adjoining farm is a moat known as
the King's Stables." Emania continued to be the house of the
Kings of Ulster for 1,000 years, until A.D. 832, when it was
razed to the ground by the three Collas.^
We may pause here to refer to an oft-quoted entry in the
Annals of Tighernach, who was Abbot of Clonmacnoise, and
died A.D. 1088. He is usually referred to as the most reliable
of our chroniclers, a reputation to which his title as regards
pre-Christian times is very questionable, and which he owes
in a large degree to the meaning that has been attached to an
entry in his Annals, which is as follows : —
* The Annals of Clonmacnoise, Murphy, S.J., p. 41, assiVn the foundation
to 450 B.C., and state that the Kings of Ulster had their palace there for 855
years thereafter.
THE GAEL. 59
In the 18th year of Ptolemy (i.e., B.C., 307) commenced to reign in
Emania, Cimbaid, the son of Fiutan, who reigned 28 years. At that
time Echu the Victorious, the father of Ugaine, is said by others to
have reigned in Tara, although we have written before, that Ugaine
reigned [then]. All the monwnenta, i.e., records of the Scoti were
" inoerta " before Cimbaith.®
The meaning usually attached to incerta here is " uncer-
tain," " unreliable." O'Donovan says : —
We may safely infer from the words of Tighernach that the ancient
historical docviments (mormmenta) existing in his time were all regarded
by him as uncertain before the time of Cimbaith, whose reign he fixes
to the year B.C. 305 (recte 307). His significant words, " omnia
monumenta Scotorum usque Cimbaith incerta erant," inspire a feeling
of confidence in this compiler which commands respect for those facts
he has transmitted to us, even wheii they relate to the period antece-
dent to the Christian era."^?
So Todd :
I believe the writer only meant to say that the historical records
relating to the period before Cimbaith are not absolutely to be relied
on."
So, too, Hyde says :—
He means that from that time forwards, he at least considered that
the substance of Irish history, as handed down to us, might, to say the
least of it, be more or less relied on.^^
The name of Echu, the father of Ugaine, does not appear
in any known series of the Kings of Tara, or the Provincial
Kings. We think Tighernach meant nothing more by incerta
than " unsettled," a meaning which the word frequently bears,
and which the context indicates to be the meaning intended
here. Tighernach was not considering the credibility of early
Irish history, but simply the question whether Ugaine or his
father was at the particular epoch (307 B.C.) the ruling
monarch at Tara, or, perhaps, to narrow the question still more,
whether Echu had died before that year or not. This was the
chronological uncertainty to which he referred.^^ It was not
* Stokes' Revue Celtiqtte, xiv., 104.
10 Four Masters, xlv.
" O'Cwrry AfS.,518.
'2 Lit. Hist., 24.
" Codex Palatinus. To-ld Lcc Ter., ill.,. 254, where a valuable and learned
study on Irish Chronology will be found.
60 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
the happening of the events recorded that was uncertain, but
the precise time and sequence in which they happened.^* We
may be perfectly certain that Tighernach believed with unques-
tioning faith in Partholan and Nemed, in Balor of the Blows
and Lugh Lamhfodba,in the spells and charms of wizards,
and the revelations of fairy lovers, and in many other soft and
fond amenities that live no longer in the unfaith of reason.
The Higher Criticism was not rocked in its cradle by the
placid Shannon in the lonely cloisters of Clonmacnoise.
" Tighernach had no doubt before him, and was referring to Eocaid Ua
Floinn's Chronolocrical Poems, ia wliich the Kings of Einania are given in
"settled " chronological order from Cimbaith to Fergus Fogha, who was over-
thrown by the CoUaa.
[ 61 ]
CHAPTER V.
Deirdre.
AEDH RUADH Dithorba and Cimbaetli were first cousins.
They made an agreement that each of them was to rule
seven years alternately in succession. Three times seven
sureties were pledged between them, seven wizards to revile
them for ever ; or seven poets to lampoon and satirize and
upbraid them ; or seven chiefs to wound them and burn them
unless each man gave up his reign at the end of seven years,
having preserved true government. Each of them reigned
three times in his turn during sixty-six years. Aed the Red
was the first of them to die. He was drowned in Eas aedha
Ruaidh, and his body was carried into the Sidh there, whence
were named Sidh Aeda and Eas Ruaidh. He left no children
except one daughter, whose name was Macha, the Red-haired.
She demanded the Kingdom in due time, when her turn
came. Cimbaeth and Dithorba said they would not give King-
ship to a woman. A battle was fought between them. Macha
routed them.^ Her claim was probably well founded. Tacitus
tells us of Boudicea that the Iceni chose her as their generalis-
simo. " With Boudicea as leader, for the Iceni make no
distinction between the sexes in their rulers, all took up arms.^
Macha was sovereign for seven years. Meanwhile Dithorba
had fallen. He left five sons, who demanded the Kingship
when Macha's term was ended. Macha said she would not
give it to them, " for not by favour did I obtain it," said she,
"but by force on the battlefield." A battle was fought
between them. Macha routed the sons of Dithorba, who " left
a slaughter of heads " before her, and went into exile into the
wilds of Connacht. Macha then took Cimbaeth as her husband
and leader of her troops. She pursued the sons of Dithorba to
Connacht, made prisoners of them, and brought them all in
* From " The Wooing of Emer," Kuno Meyer. Archeol. Rev. I., 151.
2 Boudicea generis regii femina duce (Neque enim sexum in imperils descer-
nunt), sumpsere universi belium. Agricola. C. 16. Tliere was also a queen of
the Brigautes, Cartismandua.
62 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
one chain to Ulster. The men of Ulster wanted to kill them.
" No," said she, " for that would be the ruin of my true govern-
ment. But they shall be thralls, and shall dig a rath round
me, and that shall be the eternal seat of Ulster for ever ! "
Then she marked out the dun for them with her brooch, viz.,
the golden pin on her neck ; i.e., ItnmA muin TTIxicliA : a brooch
on the neck of Macha ; hence the name Emain Macha. Such
is the legend.
Macha was slain by Reachtaidh Righdhearg (of the red
forearm), of the line of Eber, who, after a reign of two years,
was slain by Ugaine Mor, of the line of Eremon, in revenge
for his foster mother, Macha Mongruadh. Ugaine was the
son of Eocaid Buadach (the victorious), and is represented
by our texts to have had 25 children, 23 sons and two
daughters, amongst whom he divided Erin into 25 shares.
This arrangement lasted for three hundred years to the time
of Eocaid Feidleach, the father of Meve. It is also stated that
he extended his empire to the Toirrian, i.e., the Mediterranean
Sea. The last of these statements is certainly not true, and
the first must refer to some apportionment of food rents and
dues from local chieftains, if it has any foundation in fact.
The political divisions of Erin have been various according
to the will of the monarchs. However, they never totally
abrogated the five-fold division. During the time of the Gael
there were five partitions — (1) between Eremon and Eber,
(2) between Cearnma and Sobhairee, (3) by Ugaine Mor into
25 districts, (4) the re-establishment of the fifths by Eocaid
Feidleach, (5) between Conn of the Hundred Battles, and
Eogan Mor, King of Munster.
Of the children of Ugaine only two left issue surviving —
Laegaire Lore and Cobhthac Gael Breagh. From these are
descended, according to O'Donovan, all that survive of the
race of Eremon, the families of Leinster, from Laegaire Lore,
the families of Ulster and Connacht, from Cobhthac Gael
Breagh. This Ugaine was he who exacted oaths by all the
elements visible and invisible, from the men of Erin in general,
that they would never contend for the sovereignty of Erin,
with his children or his race. After a reign of forty years he
was slain by his half-brother, Badhbhchadh, who was slain a
day and-a-half after by Laogaire Lore. Laogaire Lore, after a
DEIRDRE. 63
reign of two years, fell by Cobhthach Gael Breagh, at Carman,
(Wexford), and Cobhthach, after a reign of three years, fell
by Labhraidh the mariner, great grandson of Ugaine, at Dinn
Righ on the Barrow with thirty kings about him. A large
body of Saga, much of which is now lost, was collected about
Ugaine, and his sons and great grandsons.^
In 288 B.C., Rury the Great, of the line of Ir, became High
King. He was 'ninth in descent from Ollamh Fodhla, and hav-
ing reigned for seventy years, died at Airgeat-gleann in
Monaghan (218 B.C.). His descendants were known as the
Clanna Rury. His son, Breasal, reigned for eleven years
(209-198) ; his son, Congal Claroineach, reigned fifteen years
(183-168)'; his grandson, Fachtna Fathac, reigned sixteen
years (158-142 B.C.). His great grandson, Concobar, the son
of Fachtna, ruled in Emania for sixty years, according to
Tighernach, but did not attain to the High Kingship, Con-
cobar's mother was Ness or Nessa, a daughter of Eocaid
Salbuide (of the yellow heel) of Connact. From the year
142 B.C. to 332 A.D. the Clanna Rudhraidhe gave only three
kings to Tara, who ruled altogether only twenty-five years.
Fachtna Fathac (the wise) was overthrown by Eocaidh Feid-
leach, sixth in descent from Labhraid Lore of the line of
Eremon. Fergus, the son of Leide, then became King of
Ulster, and on his death, Fergus Mac Roigh (Roy) the son of
Fachtna, uncle to Concobar, became King in his stead. Fergus
then married Nessa, the widow of his brother, Fachtna, and
was, our texts say, by her contrivance, displaced in favour of
Concobar, her son by Fachtna, for whom possibly he may have
been ruling merely as quasi-iegent, Eocaidh Feidleach ruled
at Tara for twelve years, and died there in the year 130 B.C.
He had issue three sons known as the " Three Finns," and, as
some relate, six daughters, of whom Medhbh (Meve) was the
most celebrated. He abolished the arrangement made by
Ugaine Mor, which we have mentioned, and restored the
pentarchy. Fergus the son of Leide, became King of Ulster
^ All Leiiister families of the race of Eremon are descended from Labraidh,
the mariner, with the single exception of O'Noian, which is descended from
Cobhthach. The following are the principal family names, viz. : — O'Connor
Failghi, O'Cavanagh, O'Toohill, O'Byrne, MacGilla Patrick or Fitzpatrick,
O'Dunn, O'Dimasaigh or Dempsoy, O'Dwycr, O'Ryan, and all the septs that
trace their origin to any of these names. The chief part of the Leinster clana
are descended from Cathair Mor. — Keating O'AIahony, p. 255.
64 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
on the death of Fachtna. The two Munsters were ruled by
Deaghaidh, the son of Sen, and his relative Tighernach
Tedhhannach, and Leinster by Rossa Riiadh, the son of Fergus.
Connact, he apportioned, says Keating, into three parts,
between three chieftains — Fidach, Eocaidh Alat, and Tinni,
all three of the race of the Firvolce. Some time after Eocaidh
went into Connact, and the three Kings came to meet him.
He asked them for a site to build a King's house * in Connact.
Eocaidh Alat and Fidach answered " that they would give
him no such site, but that they would send him his rent to
Tara." Tinni, on the contrary, agreed to give a site. Eocaidh
then gave his daughter Meve as wife to Tinni, and a King's
house was built within the rath at Cruachan,^ in Roscommon.
On the death of Tinni, who was slain at Tara by Monuder, also
calledMacCeact, Meve then ruling over all Connact, took to her
as second husband, Oilioll, the son of Ross Ruadh of Leinster.
Synchronists tell us Meve was contemporary with Cleopatra,
and some say she was the original of Spenser's Queen Mab. It
was whilst Meve and Oilioll reigned at Cruachan, and Concobar
was King at Emania, that the hegemony passed decisively
from the line of Ir, and the race Eremon marched forward to
the position which they occupied from the time of Niall of the
Nine Hostages onward. The contest is the subject of the
celebrated Saga or epopee of the " Cows of Cuailgne." — U^in
bo CuAilnse, which we shall refer to as the Tain. The osten-
sible pretext or cause of this war was, as usually happens, a
very insignificant part of the motives which brought about
the invasion of Ulster. The origin is usually referred to the
murder of the sons of Usnach, to explain which we must return
to King Cormac and Emania. We find in our texts a very
full and very reliable description of the buildings. In the
King's house there were three times fifty rooms and the
walls were made of red yew, and there were nine partitions
from the fire in the centre of the house to the wall, and
thirty feet the height of each partition. The King's room
was in the front of the house, and was large enough
for thirty warriors. It was ornamented with silver and
bronze and carbuncles and precious stones, so that day and
^ King's house. — This meant a dun or fort, a place of arms in their country.
* Rathcroghan, in Roacommon, is eight miles from Castlerea station.
DEIBDRE. 65
night were equally light therein. A gong of silver hung
behind the King suspended from the roof-tree, and when he
struck it with his silver wand with three golden apples all the
men of Ulster were silent. All the valiant warriors found
space in the King's house, and no man pressed on another.
In it were held great and numerous gatherings of every kind,
and wonderful pastimes, games, heroes performing their feats,
poets chanting their lays, and harp and timpans giving forth
melodious strains to the touch of skilled musicians. These
warriors were the famous Red Branch Knights. " There
were," says Keating, " three orders of champions then
co-existent in Erin, and neither before them nor since their
time were there found any of the children of Golamh, who
were taller, more powerful, hardier, braver, or more expert in
feats of valour and chivalry than they, for the Fianna of
Leinster were not to be compared with them. The first order
of these was composed of the heroes and Knights of the Red
Branch under Concobar. [Irians except Cuchulain.] The
second was formed of the Gamhanraidhe (Gowauree) of Irrus
Domnonn, under Oilioll Finn (Firvolce) ; and the third was
composed of the Clanna Degaidh or Ernaeans in West
Munster, under Curoi MacDare (Eremonians)." Among the
most celebrated of the Red Branch we may name Cuchulain,
Fergus MacRoigh (Roy), Conall Cearneach. Leagaire, Buadach,
Celtchar the son of Uithecair Dubhtach Dael Uladh, and
Naoise (Neeshe), Ainle, and Ardan, the three sons of Usnach.^
Concobar had three houses — the Craobh Ruadh (Royal or
Red Branch), Teite Brec (Speckled or " Bracced " Court) and
the Craobh Derg (Crimson Branch). In the Red Court were
kept the spoils of the enemy. In the Royal Court sat the
Kings. In the Speckled Court were kept the spears, the
shields, and the swords. The reason they put their arms
away from them in one house was that at everything harsh
they heard in the banqueting-hall, if not arranged on the
spot, each man arose against the other, and hence their arms
were taken from them into the Teite Brec. This is the
account in the Book of Leinster.' Keating makes a very
^ Ferdiad, described as a pillar of the Gael in the Tain, was of the Firvolca
of Irrus Domnann and Daniel O'Connell was of the Degadean or Eruean tribe,
of the line of Eremon, who had migrated from Ulster into Kerry.
' O'Curry. M.C.," I., 333.
66 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
necessary addition — a fourth house for the wounded — the
Broin-bherg, House of Sorrow (p. 271).^
"The Story of Deirdre and the Murder of the Sons
OF UsNACH Down Here."
The most pathetic of the three sorrows of story-telling
Once upon a time, after Concobar became King, Felimid,
the King's tale-teller, made a feast at Emania for the King
and many Knights of the Red Branch.^ Felimid's wife was
present attending to her guests and enjoying "the gentle
music of the musicians, the songs of the bards, and the tales
of the learned, who read the things written on flags and
books." She was then enceinte, and nearing her confinement,
and it chanced as she was retiring, when the revelry was at
its height, that the unborn child shrieked from her womb.
This was an ominous event of high import, portending either
good or evil to the men of Ulad. Cathbad, the King's wizard,
who was present at the feast, was at once consulted, and went
out to the borders of the rath to observe and scrutinize the
clouds, and the position of the stars, and the age of the moon.
On his return he announced that misfortunes and woes would
come to the men of Ulad on account of the yellow-haired girl
that had just been born. The heroes of the Red Branch bade
him slay her without delay, " Let it not be so done," said the
King, " agreeable is the appearance and the laugh of the
infant. It were a pity to quench her life. I do not praise the
committing of a base deed in the hope of appeasing the anger
8 When the Red Branch Knights came to the Palace every summer to be
exercised in feats of arms they were lodged in a great house near Emain, called
the Craobh Euadh, commooly EngUshed the Red Branch, from which the whole
body took their name. But, according to an old glossary, Ruadh means here
not " rod " but " royal." But, the designation " Red Branch,' which is the
usual sense, is too well established to be displaced. The name of this house is
also nreserved, for " Creeveroe " is still the name of a townland near Navan
Fort So far as we can judge from old tales, the Craobh Ruadh appears to have
been built of wood, with no earthen rampart around it, which explains why the
present townland of Creeveroe contains no large fort hke that of Emain. Joyce
Soc. Hist. II., 00.
9 There are many versions of this famous tale. The more ancient are
brief, and were undoubtedly intended, as Hyde points out, to be supplemented
and filled out by the reciter. We have followed his version m the Literature,
which ia given more completely in Zeitscrift fur Celt Philol. 11., lib.
DEIRDRE. 67
of the power of the elements. I take her under my protection
now, and shall make her my one wife and gentle Consort. I
give the men of Erin the sureties of the sun and the moon,
that any one destroying her now or again, shall not live nor
last if I survive." Then Fergus MacRoy, Conall Cearnach,
and the heroes rose up and said, " King, right is thy judgment.
Let it be thy will that is done." Cathbad named the child,
" Deirdre," which is taken to mean " alarm," and until she was
seven years old, she was brought up with the other children
of Emania, amongst whom were the three sons of Usnach, the
King's first cousins. She was then placed in a dwelling apart
with the windows opening out at the back on a fair orchard
and garden, with a stream of pure water purling softly through
it. The windows on the front were closed up, and she no
longer saw the grassy lawn, and the champions' field, and the
heroes at their feats of activity. Lavercan, the gossiper (ban-
cainte), her tutor, and her nurse were the only persons allowed
to see Deirdre. " Daughter," said Lavercan, " you have not
seen the boys on the green of Emania since you were seven
years old, and that is now seven years ago." " Seven bitter
years," said Deirdre, "' since I beheld the delight of the green
and the playing of the boys, and surely, too, Naoisi [Neeshe]
surpassed all the youth of Emania." "Naoisi, the son of
Usnach," said Lavercan, " Naoisi, is his name, as he told me,"
said Deirdre, " but I did not ask whose son he was." "As he
told you ? " said Lavercan. " As he told me," said Deirdre,
" when he made a throw of a ball by a mis-cast backward,
transversely over the heads of the band of maidens that were
standing on the edge of the green, and I rose from amongst
them all, till I lifted the ball and delivered it to him, and he
pressed my hand joyously," " He pressed your hand, girl ? "
asked Lavercan. '* He pressed it lovingly, and said that he
would see me again, but it was difficult for him, and I did not
see him since until yesterday, and, oh ! gentle nurse, if you
wish me, if you wish me to be alive, take a message from me
to him, and tell him to come and visit me, and talk to me to-
night secretly." As became a true Knight of the Red Branch,
Naoisi, with the brown-black hair and the skin as white as
snow, did not fail to appear at the trysting hour. Accompanied
by his brothers, Ainle and Ardan, and 150 champions, he
68 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
eloped with Deirdro to Alba, where they were hospitably
received by the King. Cormac was filled with fury and what
the bards call jealousy, and meditated revenge. He induced
Naoisi and his brothers to return to Emania on the guarantee
of Fergus MacRoy, Cormac Conlingeas, his own son, and
Dubthac Dael Ulad, who pledged themselves that no harm
should befall them. Deirdre warned them, but in vain, not
to return, and not to trust the king. On their arrival the
three sons of Usnach were treacherously slain by Cormac's
order. At their burial Deirdre went to the tomb and dis-
hevelled her hair, and sang the lays of lamentation —
That I should live after Naosi
Let no man on earth imagine.
Oh, man that diggest the tomb,
And that pullest my darling from me, *
Make not the grave too narrow,
I shall be beside the noble ones.
The most pathetic of the lays, and the most beautiful lyric
in Gaelic, perhaps in any language, is her farewell to Alba.
In unstudied tenderness and delicacy it cannot be surpassed.
Deirdre's pity for the sorrow of the other love, the Jarl's
daughter, touches a very deep chord in the human heart, and
is, so far as we know, unique in literature.
DEIRDRE'S FAREWELL TO ALBA.
I.
S6f Alt) foit^ 50 ViAlbAin tiAim,
tnuft mbio"6 mic tlifnig ^5 f^itg
Aeit)inn y\.nX)e op leipg a t>enn.
II.
VA X)a f Ait> triAite AlbAti aj^ 61,
If mic Urnig "oit^ cCift cin,
"O'lnjin ^A^lA "OuriA U^eoin
'Oo tvtc tlxieif e pOg g^n pif.
ni.
"Oo (iuif Cuice eiliT) V)Aet
<A5 aUxm*, If lAeg f e a coif ;
If X)0 $At) f6 Cuice Aip CUAIfC,
XNg pllAt 6 flu^S lnt5et\ rioif.
DEIRDRE. 69
IV.
XY\a^ T)o cuxitAt:) mife fin
Un^f mo Cinr. l^n T)on 6"0,
Cuifiof mo Cupt-An Aip cuinn,
'S X)A cumA liom b^f 116 65.
V.
'Letio,"D^\p mife -Aip a cpnAiti
x^innte ip ^p"oAn ni|\' Cam bf^eg,
"Oo piLlet)A|\ m6 A fceA6
"Dif "oo CuippAt) CAt A\\\ t6uv.
YI.
•Qo tuc TlAeipe bt^i^tAiii pT|i
'S "OO IU15 fo cpi 1 |:piAt)nuif Aj^ni
11xj(b ccuipfAt) opmfA sfUAim
50 ccei$ uAim Ait^ fluxxg nA mAt\t3.
VII.
tic ! "DA ccltiineAt) fifi Atiotc
tlAeife fteit pAi fepAC a ccpe,
"Do guiLpeAt) f i 50 t)eA<ic,
'S "00 $uitptnn-pA po peCc 16.
VIII.
Ca ti-insnAtti Cin AgAm p6in
Aip CjiiC Att>An po p^it) pot) ;
t)A plAn mo 6eile 'ha mepg,
fA liom pein a Vi-ei6 'pA li-op.^®
Farewell eastward to Alba from me,
Goodly the sight of her havens and glens,
When the sons of Usnach used to be hunting,
Delightful to sit on the slopes of her hills.
II.
One day when Alba's chiefs were feasting,
And Usnach's sons to whom love was fitting,
To the daughter of the Jarl of Dun Trene,
Naoise gave a kiss " unknownst."
"This text ia from Iriscbe Texte, 2nd Series, p. 116 (Stokes). Oiir
translation is based on the tranelation there, but we have made acme changes
for which that eminent scholar is not responsible.
70 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
III.
He sent her a frisking doe,
A hind with a fawn at her feet,
And he went to her on a visit,
Coming back from the hosting at Inverness.
IV.
/
When I heard that myrelf
My head filled full of jealousy ;
I shoved my little boat out on the waves,
All equal to me was death (from grief) or drowning.
V.
They followed me out swimming,
Ainle and Ardan, who never lied,
[They spoke comfortable words about Naoise, and pacified her.]
They turned me homewards,
The twain that would fight a hundred.
VI.
Naoise pledged a true word,
Thrice he swore before sword and spear (*it\m)
That he would never cause me grief
Until he went from me on the hosting of the dead.
VII.
Ochone ! if she heard to-night
That Naoise was in his shroud in the clay
She would weep unceasingly,
And I should weep sevenfold with her.
VIII.
What wonder if there is love within me,
For the land of Alba where the way (of life) is smooth,
Safe was my husband within it,
Its steeds and its gold were mine.
Deirdre, according to our text, after singing the lays of
lamentation, leaped into the grave on Naoise's neck and died
forthwith. And she was buried with the sons of Usnach,
and their flagstone was raised over their grave, and their
names were written in Ogham, and their lamentation rites
were celebrated. Thus far the tragic tale of the sons of
Usnach.
DEIBDRE. 71
The greatest insult that could be offered to a Gaelic cham-
pion was to violate his guarantee. Fergus and Cormac
Conlingeas, with their followers, rose up against the King and
burned Emania. They were, however, afterwards defeated
and compelled to fly to Connact, where they were welcomed
by Meve and OiliolL^^
Then commenced the long war between Concobar of Ulster
and M6ve of Connact, in which she was aided by chieftains
and champions from all the provinces of Erin. The events of
this war form the subject matter of a cycle of vSagas, commonly
known as the Red Branch Cycle, in which we follow the
fortunes of the bravest of the Gael, Cuchulainn.
Setna killed Rolecthaid at Rathcruachain whilst he was under the guaran*
tee of Feacba.
Four years were reigned by Setna the Tall,
Fell the King by his great son [Fcacha],
Forgave not the son the dreadful deed
To his father his being outraged. — G. Coemaia Erin Ard.
^ Fergus sings in the Tain :
1p me cuiti5lAim riA fluAju fAiti,
ludj mo f-AiiAi^ce -o'llLcAib.
It is I that gathered the forces eastward
In revenge for my dishonour by the Ultoniana. ,
[ 72 3
CHAPTER VL
CUCHULAINN.
*"T^HE death of Cuchulainn, the bravest hero of the Gael. . .
1 Seven years was his age when he received arms ; seven-
teen 3^ears his age when he was behind the Cows of Cuaiigne ;
twenty-seven years his age when he died."i Such is the entry
in Tighernach, at the date A.D. 1, apparently. The bravest of
the brave (Setanta was his first name), was the son of Sualtam,
of the line of Eremon, who was chieftain of Muirtheimne.
This was the level land of Louth, through which flows the
river Dee, on which now stands the town of Ardee. Sualtam
was married to Dechtire, Concobar's sister, and had his dun
and great house and pillar (" Temair and Coirthech ") on a
hill about one mile from Dundalk. The mound, which is now
all that remains of it, is still forty feet in perpendicular height;
is circular, and has an area on top of half an acre. The central
dun was enclosed by an outer rampart, which is still, in some
parts which remain, thirty feet high. The area within the
rampart is over two acres, and the dun, subsequently named
Dun Dealgan, is now known as the Moat of Castletown. Louth
was at this time included in Ulster, and Dun Dealgan, (Dun-
dalk) was a frontier fort of the first importance. It commanded
the entrance to the Moyry Pass, four miles away to the north
— the only passage to Armagh on the north, except round the
Carlingford coast. The road to Armagh (Slighe Midluachra)
from Tara ran through this pass, as the railway to Belfast does
at the present time, passing through the wooded district
known as the Fews (Feadha). On the left of this highway
rises Sliev Gullion (Sliabh Cuilinn) [1,893 feet], on the top of
which is a cairn, which legend says was piled up over the
grave of Cualgni, the son of Breogan. By this cairn a watch
was kept in the time of Concobar, as a defensive precaution
for the protection of Armagh, and near it are still traceable
^ Mors Oonchulaind fortissimi herois Scotorum. . . VII. mbliadna a aes
in tan rogab £;aisced, XVII. mbliadna a aes intan mboi indegaid Tana bo
Cuaiigne, XXVlI. mbliadna immorra a aea intan athbath. — Rev. Celt., svi.. 407.
CUCHULAINN. 73
the remains of an enclosure which may have been a ho-dun,
or possibly the clithar bo Ulad, the shelter for the cows of Ulad.
The Carlingford mountains (Sliabh Cuilgne), occupying
the headland between Dundalk Bay and Carlingford Lough,
were also a natural fastness of srreat strength, into which the
cows of the fertile pastures of Murtheimne might be driven
on the approach of a raiding force. Behind those cattle, as
they were driven into these strongholds, the champions of
Murtheimne would muster in their strength, and foremost
amongst them Setanta, the " Wolf-dog " of the Border, the
watch-dog of Cuilinn and Cuailgne, to be known ever after as
Cuchulainn.2
" The least that is expected of one that wards the marches,"
Cuchulainn says in the Tain, " is to raise the cry, to give
prompt warning, to be able to say who it is that comes the
way," And Sualtam, when they were at the pillar of stone
of Ard Cuillin, bids him " Take warning to the men of Ulad
(of the approach of Meve's army) — bid them that they be not
in the great open plains, but betake them to the woods and
glens of the province if so they may evade the men of Erin."
One of the most formidable of Setanta's foes, a chieftain of
the Firvolce, Ceat Mac Magach, is described in our texts as a
mighty warrior of Connactand a fierce " Wolf of Evil " to the
men of Ulster (pncu n'uilc ar Ultacaibh). The wolf was soon
to come prowling in quest of prey from Connact in the host of
Meve and test the fighting qualities of the watch-dog of Ulad.
" This Ceat was a man of prowess," says Keating. " He con-
tinued during his life to be the untiring plunderer of the men
of Ulster, and in these raids he was aided by Fergus Mac Roigh
and his band of exiles. It was during this time, which ex-
tended over seven years before the great invasion by Meve,
that Setanta performed those feats of valour which the most
famous of the Gaelic poems was composed to celebrate." ^
2 There were very many Gaelic names into which Cu, the famous wolf-dog,
entered, e.g., Cu Ulad, Cu Connact, Cu Muman, etc., etc. There were also
many places near Dundealgan called Cuillin — Sliab Cuillin, Cerd Cuillin, Shge
Cuillin, and a river called Cuillin. It is, we think, probable that a large
district in the plain of Louth was at one time called Cuillin, or by some name
which Culainn now represents in Cuchulainn. The story of the smith's dog is
an etymological " Wahres ouriosum," as the Germans have it.
^ Ceat was the brother of Oilioll Finn, chief of the fierce Gamanraide of Irrus
Domuann, from whom descended the Clanna Moma. — O'Mahony, 271, 274.
74 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
The Tain may be divided into three sections— (1) The
Feats which we have just referred to, which may be called
the dptffrito of Cuchulainn ; (2) his Boyish Exploits, an episode
which occupies nearly a sixth of the poem ; and (3) the Legend
of the Two Mytho-heroic Bulls, which were, according to
a popular account, the re-births of two swineherds who hated
and fought with each other in their lifetime, and had passed
into the shapes of various animals before becoming bulls.
Many suppose that this old legendary feud has lasted into our
own times under the protection of the shillelaghs of the
" Three-year-old " and " Four-year-old " factions, which is said
to have originated about the age of a bull. These bulls, named
the Dun or Brown of Cuailgne and Finbheannach (Fin-van-
ach) or White Horn, were endowed with intelligence.* The
great Queen Mor-Rigu speaks to them. Neither the Bocanach
(male goblins), nor the Bananach (female goblins), nor the
geniti glinni ^ (Sprites of the Valley), could come into one
cantred with them.
Their appearance in the T4in is an excrescence of the
decadence, in which time, in our judgment, the prose part of
the Tain, in the Book of Leinster, was composed or redacted.^
* Cophur in Da Mucceda (the Generation of the two Swineherds;. — Ir.
Texte, 2nd Series, 230.
5 Genita glinni, female sprites {sini;. genit) of the valley. Bocanachs,
male Bananachs, female, goblins. Joyce, Soc. Hist. I., 269.
8 The text of the Tain is found partly in the leABdji tia hUit)1iiie, and the
part missing from that is found in the " Yellow Book of Lecan V (1400 c). The
latter includes the Ferdiad portion in a brief text with old linguistic forms,
which, however, is very brief, and v/as, as we have mentioned, in the case of
the murder of the Sons of Usnach, intended to be expanded and embellished by
the S5eAlAiT)e, a privilege, the abuse of which introduced the decadence. The
metrical part of version in the Book of Leinster is, we think, the oldest version
of the " Ferdiad," and the oldest part of the Tain.
Windisch has recently published a splendid edition of the Tain from
the text in the Book of Leinster. The great scholar who has thus added to the
huge debt the Gael owe him justly observes that they are entitled to be proud
of their old Hero-Saga — " Irland darf-stolz seiu auf seine alte Helden Saga. —
Tain bo Cualgne nach Dem Buch von Leinster Leipzig (I'JOo)."
Tain ho spems to us to be = ba, cows, and to be used for euphony, and
because " ba " has divers meanings, t)6cAince means cattle herds, and if
CAin=x)o-Aj;A-im (drive), which we leave to experts to decide, it can receive a
full meaning in " drove," The primary sense of CAin bo would thus be a
herd or drove of cows. In a secondary use it would mean a ballad or story of
a raid for lifting or hosting for the rescue of cattle, with episodes and embellish-
ments. Caiii bo would thus be wholly inappropriate as a title for a ballad or
story describing a foray for a magic bull. In this way biiuoiTjen, a hostel, has
a secondary meaning, i.e., a brawl at a hostel, e.s., bjioitien bes "A h^tmAine
•• the little brawl at Almhain." The observations of S. H. O Grady on this
point seem entitled to carry his views, tbilva Gadelica II., xvi.
CUCHULAINN. 75
The story of the " Boyish Feats " was told to Meve during
the march to Ulster by Fergus and Cormac Conlingeas and by
Fiacha. We shall only refer to it for the purpose of introduc-
ing our readers to the following legend.
According to the story in the "Boyish Feats of Cu"
Setanta got the name in this way. At a feast given by Culainn
the Smith, who lived near Sliabh Cuilinn, Setanta being then
six years, killed a fierce dog (cu) belonging to the Smith.
" Little boy," said the Smith, " that was a good member of my
family you took from me, a safeguard of raiment, of flocks and
of herds." " Be not angered thereat," said the boy, " for in
this matter myself will pronounce an equitable award. If in
all Erin there be a whelp of that dog's breed by me shall he
be nurtured till he be as fit for action as his sire (that I have
killed). In the meantime myself will do thee a ban-dog's
office in guarding of thy cattle and substance and strong
place." " Well hast thou made the award," said Concobar,
and Cathbad the Wizard, chiming in, declared that he could
not have done it better, and that thenceforth the boy should
bear the name Cu-Chulainn or Culainn's Hound. " I like my
own name better," said the boy. " Setanta Mac Sualtaim."
" Never say it," remonstrated Cathbad, " for all men in the
world shall have their mouths full of that name." ^
When the invasion of Ulster was resolved on, Meve sent
word to the seven Manies, her sons by Oilioll, to come to
Cruachan and mobilize her army. The first corps had on them
black heads of hair and green mantles, held with silver
brooches, and, next to their skins, shirts of gold thread, having
round patterns of red gold. The second corps was composed
of the Firvolce from Irrus Domnann, under the leadership of
Ceat Mac Magach and his six brothers. They had new cut hair,
and the colour is consequently not stated, as it could not be
seen under their caps or helmets. They had grey mantles
and pure white shirts. This corps consisted of 3,000 warriors.
The third corps was formed of the Ulster Exiles, under
Fergus MacRoigh and Cormac Conlingeas. They had flowing,
fair, yellow hair, with sheen of gold all cast loose. Fine wrou^^ht
crimson mantles with cunning devices of ornaments enwrapped
them, and at their breast they had golden jewelled brooches,
' The CuchulliQ Saga. E. Hull, 141.
76 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
and silken shirts, fine textured, touched the middle of their
insteps. In unison they both lifted their feet and put them
down. They numbered 8,000. This force was joined by
contingents from the other provinces. The army marched by
Athlone to Kells. Meve went with them in her chariot,
accompanied by her daughter, Finnabhair (" bright beam," or
of the " fair eyebrows "). When they halted for the night she
inspected the troops. The Gailleoin of Leinster, a Firvolce
tribe, won her admiration and excited her fears. " What
excellence performed they that they should be praised before
all others ? " said her husband, Oilioll.
" They give cause for praise," said Meve, " for whilst others
were choosing their camping-ground they had made their
booths and shelters; and while others were makinsr their
booths and shelters they had their feast of meat and alo laid
out ; and while others were laying out their feactc of bread and
ale these had finished their food and fare, and while others
were finishing their food and fare these were asleep. Even as
their slaves and servants have excelled the slaves and servants
of the men of Erin so will their good heroes and youths excel
the good heroes and youths of the men of Erin in this
hosting."
Oilioll said it was all the better since they were fighting on
their side. But Meve protested that she would like to have
them killed and slaughtered as she considered that they were
a danger in the host. Oilioll and Fergus dissented from this
and remonstrated with her, audit was finally settled that they
were to be distributed among the men of Erin so that not
more than five of them should remain together. This was a
surious incident, and may, perhaps, be regarded as a pre-
monition of the revolt of the Atheach Tuatha under
Cairbre Cennceat which occurred at the commencement of
our era.
Kells is on the borders of Ulster, and the dptorim of
Cuchulainn commences from this point. His feats consisted in
a series of single combats with champions from Move's array
whilst the men of Ulad were suffering from a malady which
was called the noinclen Ulad. According to the tale in the
Book of Leinster (125, p. 40) this illness was to last for four
days and five nights = nine, and for nine generations. This
CUCHULAINN. 77
malady was a lethargy (in gala ndian) and so Noinden would
appear to mean a lethargy for nine days.^
The transformation of the ces noinden, the nine whiles
malady, into the ces noiden (childbirth debility) must be an
attempt to connect the debility with the legend of Macha and
the twins. It has led the venturesome still farther afield — all
the way to the Couvade. This curious custom, which is said
to survive in some remote parts of the world, imposed on the
husband the duty of taking the new-born infant to bed with
him and nursing it whilst the mother attended to household
affairs. There is no trace of its ever having existed in Erin,
nor could domestic incidents of this kind occur simultaneously
in any large number of the households of the Red Branch
Knights, There was, however, a form of the sleeping sickness
known in Erin in the Middle Ages, which lasted for four or
five days, and during that time incapacitated the patient from
doing soldier's work. The malady, epidemic in its nature, may
have existed at the time of the Tain, and would very naturally
be utilized by the pie who created or reconstructed the Tdin to
account for the absence of the Red Branch warriors and so give
Cuchulainn his opportunity and his victories in single combat.
The legend of Macha is shortly as follows : — Macha, the
wife of Crunchu, is said to have been compelled to run in a
^Windisch observes in his introduction to the text and translation of the
Noinden Ulad — " In the Book of Leinster version Noinden stands unmis-
takeably in relation with the number 9. The den of Noinden may belong to
the old Ir. ' danus ' whiles, and to the SKR dinn-doy, although it is not a
question of nine days but five days and four nights or five nights and four days."
Another meaning noinden = Tinol = a gathering, he refers to, quoting
O'Donovan, and continues — " The full expression for the matter under con-
eideration is cess Noinden Ulad, for which cess and Noinden singly are used as
abbreviations. The full expression means either the 'weakness ' of the men of
Ulster for nine ' whiles,' or the 'weakness' of the men of Ulster orginating in
a festival meeting. In the Book of Fermoy, according to Todd, are found ces
naoidhen (infant or child-birth suffering) from 0. Ir noidin gen. noiden, a
child. But since this word is usual in the spoken language the abbreviation
noiden Ulad for cess noiden Ulad is inconceivable."
The reference to Todd in the Book of Fermoy, which states the ces
afflicted the Ulstermen for nine generations. — Proc. Ry, Ir, Acad. MS. series,
vol. I, p. 17.
We do not understand Todd to say it is called ces noiden in the Book of
Fermoy, but infer the contrary. He says " it is called also ces naoidhean, infant
or child-birth suffering." — Windisch — Noinden Ulad, Koniglech Sachsische
Gesellschaft, Phil, and His. Classe, 1884, 337. In the Yellow Book of Lecan
it is called ceas nagen, which Atkinson equates with "ces noiden "(211, line 40).
This affected the men of Ulad for the reign of nine kings. O'Curry gives ceas
naidhean, child debihty, in MSS. 37, and enchanted sleep, M. and C., II., 319.
Nine was a magic number. See the catalogue of " Nines" in L'epope^ Celtique
(D'Arbois) p. 527.
78 EARLY IT^TSH HISTORY
cliariot race at Armagh against the king's horses to save
Crunchu's life. She pleaded for delay as she was about to be
confined. It was refused. She outran the king's horses and
gave birth to twins, and laid her curse on the Ultonians, the
noinden Ulad. Hence the place was called Emain Macha,
the twins of Macha. By the Ultonians she meant the Clanna
Rury,the descendants of Ir, so Cuchulainn, being an Eremonian,
did not come under this legendary malediction^ It has been
observed that no pedigrees are traced to him. This may,
perhaps, be the explantation. The Eremoniaus would not trace
to him as he took sides against them in the great war. The
Clanna Rury would not trace to him because he was not of the
line of Ir. ^
According to the account given in "The Proceedings of
the Great Bardic Association," when Senchan Torpeist was
chosen Ard Ollamh about 600 A.D., he assembled the pile
and asked if any of them remembered the whole of the Tain.
All the pie said they remembered only fragments of it The
Book in which it was written had been taken to the east by a
certain saoi, as well as the great Skin Book called the
Cuilmenn. Afterwards, when the Bardic Association had
overstayed their welcome with the hospitable Guaire at
Durlus on the Moy, Morvan the hermit, brother of Guaire, put
them under prohibition (ge^f^) not to stay two nights in any
house until they found the Tain. So they had to leave
Durlus, and then searched Alba and many places in vain for
the Tain, and finally returned to Durlus.^**
Guaire gave a kiss to St. Caillin of Feenagh and to Senchan,
and a general welcome to the Bardic Body. Morvan the
hermit was sent for. He told them there was not living in
3 In the prose of the Tain this •' noinden'' (nine whiles) is lost sight of.
It is stated that Cuchulainn was waiting for the men of Ulster from November to
February. "From Monday before Samhain, November 1st to the Wednesday
next after St. Bridget's Day (or Imbulc LL.), the 1st of Ferbuary, saving only
a brief snatch at midday, he never slept, and even that was taken as he leaned
on his spear." And Cuchulainn tells Sualtam after the fight with Ferdiad
when he was covered with hurts and wounds, " Get thee to Emania. Tell
Ulster that for the future they must come themselves and follow up their Tain
{i.e., tliCir cows), seemg that 1 am no more able to defend and rescue them,
because from the Monday before Samhain, etc., in the gaps and passes of
Conaille Murtheimne I have stood against the four great provinces of Erin."
Hull, 171.
"Joyce, Soc. Ir., IL says Durlus was near Kinvaro on Galway Bay, it
was where Guaire held his court alternately with Gort in Galway. O'Curry
says Durlus Maoid he, on the Moy M. C, 11., 87-
CUCnULAINN. 79
Erin, nor among the dead, anybody who could repeat the
Tain, but one person only — Fergus MacRoy. " How are we to
act ? " said they. Morvan said, ''Send invitations to the saints
of Erin, and bring them to the tomb of Fergus, and fast three
days and three nights to the Lord, to send Fergus to repeat
the Tain to you." This was done, and Fergus came forth
from the tomb, which was at the brink of Lough En, in Ros-
common, and he was about repeating the Tain, standing up,
but they would hear none of it until he was seated." Kieran
of Clonmacnoise was he who wrote for him, and the place on
which he wrote it was on the hide of the Dun Cow. The
Book was then known as Lebar na huidhre.^^ "When the Tain
was finished, Fergus returned to the tomb. The saints and
the Bards proceeded to Durlus, and feasted with Guaire for
three days and three nights.^^
The recension of the Tain that has reached us in the texts
we have mentioned is remarkable for the way in which it
deals with Fergus MacRoy. It represents him from the outset
of the expedition as acting treacherously towards Meve and
her allies ; leading the army astray ; entering into a compact
with Cuchulainn, that if the latter pretended to be afraid of
him and ran away he would do as much for him on a future
occasion. " Loth am I," said Cuchulainn, " to fly before any
warrior of the Tain." " No need for such repugnance," quoth
Fergus, " for in my turn, what time in the great final battle
of the Tain you shall be full of wounds and drenched with
blood, before thee I will fly." This he did accordingly.^*
This treachery appears to be most improbable, and is quite
out of keeping with the chivalry of a Red Branch Knight. It
may have been introduced as a salve to the wounded feelings
of defeated Connact.
Senchan Torpeist made his redaction about 600 A.D. He
was a Connactman, and when he went from the house of
Guaire, " the hospitable," to the tomb of Fergus, and brought
him up from the other world, we may be sure that Fergus did
not reveal this villainy on his own part.
On the other hand., the Firvolce obtain a very prominent
position, and much praise from the redactor, and we suggest
" O'Cnrry, M.C., ii., 89. '^ Q-oAti gen. Oiojie, dark grey.
**038. Soo., V. 125, ImteAdc tia CttonroAirhe. " Hull, 1811.
80 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
that this Connact version of Tain did not emanate from the
tomb, but is racy of the soil of that province. We may be
certain it was never presented in that way in the King's House
at Emain Macha. ^^
There were, no doubt, many versions of the Tain, and none
could be called in any way authorised or authentic. There
were ample grounds for the note appended by the scribe to
the version in the Book of Leinster : — " A blessing on each one
who shall faithfully memorize the Tain in this form, and shall
not put another form upon it." He adds the caution of
a sound critic — " But I who have transcribed this history, or,
more truly, legend (fabulum), do not put faith in some things
in this history or legend. For some things are the tricks
(praestigia) of the devil ; some things the figments of poets ;
some things are like the truth, and some are not ; and some
things are for the amusement of fools."
The fight with Ferdiad is the most famous, and the finest
episode in the Tain. Ferdiad was Cuchulainn's most formi-
dable antagonist, and his victory over him was his greatest
triumph, " Every other fight," he said, " and every other
combat that ever I have made, was to me but a game and a
sport, compared to the combat and fight with Ferdiad." The
fight took place at a ford of the little river Dee, which flows
from west to east through the plain of Muirtheimne. Ferdiad
advanced from the south, where Meve's army was encamped,
and Cuchulainn stood behind the Tain on the north bank,
protecting them in their retreat. Several single combats had
taken place at this river with the champions of Meve's forces,
who are styled the men of Erin, and then it was discussed by
the men of Erin who should go to the battle with Cuchulainn
on the morrow. What they all said was, that it was Ferdiad,
the valiant champion of the men of Domnann, For their
mode of combat was equal and alike ; they had been taught
the science of arms by the same tutors — by Scathach, Uathach
and Aife, and neither of them had any advantage over the
other, except that Cuchulainn had the feat of the Gae Bolga.
Messengers were sent for Ferdiad, but he refused to come, as
^^ Senchan was by birth a native of Connact, and we have a shrewd
suspicion that Fergus MacRoy's Ghost was also a Connactman, with a liberal
iash of Firvolcic blood in his veios. — O'Curry, M.C., iv., 83.
CUCHULAIXN. 8]
he knew what they wanted — that he should fight his own
friend, and companion, and fellow-pupil, Cuchulainn. At
length, being threatened with wizardry and blemishing
satires, he came to Meve, who made him tempting offers —
" the beautiful Finnabhair, the princess of western Elga (Erin)
on the killing of Cu of the Feats," with a great reward in rings
and his share of plain and woodland. He shall get all that he
desires. Ferdiad demands guarantees.
I will not go Avithout securities
To the Feats of the ford ;
It will live unto the judgment day
In full vigour and force ;
I will not accept though I die,
Though thou excitest me in larsuasre,
Without the sun and the mooji^
Together with the sea and the land}^
All the securities he requires are given. Fergus MacRoigh
then visits Cuchulainn, and tells him to be cautious and pre-
pared, that " his own friend and companion and fellow-pupil
will come to fight him next morning." " We give our word,"
said Cuchulainn, " it is not to fight ourselves we wish our
friend to come,^^ I am here detaining and delaying the four
entire provinces of Erin, from Samhain to Imbulc (Spring)
and I have not yielded one foot in retreat before any one man
during that time, neither will I, I trust, yield before him."
Fergus tells him again to beware, and says : —
It is I have gathered the hosts eastwards
In requital for my dishonour by the Ultonians ;*^
"With me they have come from their lands,
Their champions and their fighting men.
The folk in Ferdiad's tent were not cheerful, happy, or
unsorrowful that night, because they knew whenever the
two companions met one or both of them should fall, and if
only one that their master would be the vanquished. In the
^^ This is the old Gaelic pagan oath. In the L. U. we have the transition
oath, I swear the oath that my people swear, and Lugaid Mac Nois, King of
Munster, swears by God !
" O'Curry, M.C., III., 410. Text and Translation (by Sullivan).
^8 Fergus had evidently never heard of the Two Bulls b3ing the casus belli
G
82 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
morning his charioteer endeavours to dissuade him from goinp-
to the ford, and said —
It is better for thee to stay,
It is a meeting of which grief will coma
Long will it be remembered,
Woe is he that goeth that journey.
Ferdiad answers —
A brave champion should not refuse
Courage is better than fear,
Ferdiad then goes to the Ford/^ and the charioteer hears
the noise of Cuchulainn's chariot.
I hear the creaking of a chariot,
He is a heroic wolf dog who is in it,
The wolf dog of Emain Macha,
The watch dog of the territory, the hound of battle,
I hear, I have heard.
And now as a sample of the prose style of the decadence
we proceed : " Ferdiad's charioteer was not long there until he
saw something, the beautiful flesh-seeking four peaked chariot
with speed, with velocity, with full running, with a green
pavilion, with a thin-bodied, dry-bodied high-weaponed long-
speared, war-like croit (i.e., body), of the chariot, upon
two fleet-bounding, large- eared, fierce-prancing, whale-
bellied, broad-chested, lively-hearted, high-flanked, wide-
hoofed, slender-legged, broad-rumped, resolute horses under
it."2o
Ferdiad bade welcome to Cuchulainn. *' I am happy at thy
coming," said Ferdiad. " The welcome would have been
acceptable to rae until this time," said Cuchulainn. " It were
fitter that I bade thee Avelcome, for you have come into my
province, and my women and children and youths and horses
and steeds and flocks and herds and cattle are out before thee."
And then they uttered sharp, unfriendly invectives against
each other, and then a softer feeling came into the heart of
Cu:—
19 ■NT,
Now Ferdiads Ford. Ardee, Ai f eicoiAt). ^ See c, 20 infra.
CUCHULAINN. 83
When we were with Scathach
Together we used to practice,
Together we went to every battle,
Thou wert my heart comjianion,
Thou wert my tribe, thou wert my family.
One dearer found I never ;
Woeful would be thy destruction,
Art thou not bought with divers arms,
A purple girdle and skin-protecting armour ;
The maiden for whom thou makest battle
Shall not be thine, O son of Deman ;
Finnabhair the daughter of Meve,
Though it be for the comeliness of her figure ;
The maiden though fair her form,
Shall not be given to thee first to enjoy ;
Finnabhair the daughter of the Kinsj
The reward which has been proffered to thee
To numbers before thee has been falsely promised,
And many like thee has she brought to ruin.
" Too long have We remained this way now," said Ferdiad,
" and what arms shall we resort to to-day ? "
"Thine is the choice of arms to-day," said Cuchulainn,
" for thou was first at the ford."
They fought with massive weapons till mid-day. The
shooting was excellent, but so good was the defence that
neither reddened the other. From noon to eve-tide they
fought with straight, hardened spears, with flaxen strings to
them, and each of them wounded the other in that time.
They ceased, they put away their arms, and each of them
approached the other put his hands around his antagonist's
neck and kissed him thrice. Their horses were in the same
paddock that night and their charioteers at the same fire.
Of every healing herb that was put to the wounds of Cu
he would send an equal portion over the ford westward to
Ferdiad. Of each kind of palatable and pleasant intoxicat-
ing drink that was sent by the men of Erin to Ferdiad
he would send a fair moiety over the ford northward to
Cuchulainn.
Next day Cuchulainn was first at the ford, and had the
choice of weapons. " Let us fight from our chariots to-day,"
said Ferdiad. The wounds inflicted were so severe that the
84 EARLY IRISH HISTORY
leeches could only apply wizardry and incantations and
charms to staunch the bleeding. The combatants embraced
and kissed each other thrice, as before, and their horses
were in the same paddock, and their charioteers at the
same fire that night. The third day they fought with
swords. At eventide the separation was mournful. They
did not embrace each other. Their horses were not in
the same paddock, nor their charioteers at the same fire that
night.
On the morning of the fourth day each knew that one or
both of them should fall. Cuchulainn spoke to Laeg, his
charioteer, and said, " Laeg. if it be that I shall begin to yield
this day, thou art to excite and reproach me so that the ire of
my rage shall grow more upon me. If it be that I prevail
then praise me that my courage may be the greater." " It
shall be done, indeed," said Laeg. Cuchulainn chose the
Ford Feat, in which he was used to destroy every champion
that came against him. Great were the deeds done this day by
" the two beloved pillars of the valour of the Gael." ^^ After
the fight had raged furiously for several hours Cuchulainn
began to flag. Then Laeg interposed with taunts and insult-
ing words, but, nevertheless, Ferdiad, in an unguarded
moment, got in a home-thrust with his straight-edged sword.
Cuchulainn then shouted to Laeg for the Gae Bolga. " The
manner of that was this : it used to be set down the stream
and cast from between the toes. It made the wound of one
spear on entering the body, but it had thirty barbs to open
inside." Cuchulainn caught this weapon as it floated down
the stream between his toes, and made an unerring cast of it
at Ferdiad. " That is enough, now, indeed," said Ferdiad.
'.* I fall of that." Cuchulainn ran towards him, and
clasped him in his arms, and carried him to the north
side of the ford ; and he laid him down there, and
a faintness came over him. "Arise," said Laeg, "the
men of Erin are approaching." "What availeth me to
arise now," said Cuchulainn, "since Ferdiad has fallen by
me?"
Up to this point, treating the expedition purely as an
^Ferdiad and Cuchulainn are styled Gael ("Oa ATidAi|\ loit jAfcix) SactoaI),
two beloved pillars of the valour of the Gael
CUCHULAINN. 85
invasion, it was one of the usual raiding cow-lifting forays which
would come under the denomination of a Tain-bo. Upon this
was in after time engrafted the absurd legend of a bull-lifting
expedition and a battle between the "Brown" of Cuailgne and
the " Whitehorn " of Connacht. The men of Erin carry off
the " Brown," but are overtaken by the men of Ulster, near
Clara, in Westmeath, and a battle is fought at Gairich and
Ilgairich, in which the men of Erin are defeated, but
succeed in carrying off the "Brown" to Cruachan. A
battle then ensues between the Bulls, and the "Brown"
is victorious and returns to Cuailgne, where his heart
bursts with the bellowings he thunders forth to announce
and celebrate his triumph ! — an anti-climax, truly, as Hyde
observes.
A few years later came the revanche. Meve again invaded
Ulster, and a great battle was fought on the plains of Murth-
eimne. Cuchulainn fell mortally wounded. When he found
that his death was nigh he bound himself with his breast-
girdle to a pillar-stone that he might not die seated or lying
down. And thus standing up, fully armed, and facing the foe
in the bloom of early manhood, passed away the bravest hero
of the Gael. Some will have it that he was not of the Gael at
all but a mythological person — a solar hero. Nutt, in his very
interesting and popular story on mythology, entitled " Cuchu-
lainn the Irish Achilles," says " Miss Hull has summarised so
admirably the argument for the mythical nature of Cuchulainn
that I need not apologise for borrowing her words." The sum-
mary is too long to be inserted here. It consists in the
enumeration of feats which no human being could have per-
formed, because they were impossible. Nutt adds " racial and
historical elements have been added to the myth." We think
on the contrary that mythical elements have been added to
historical ones in this as in many other cases for poetical
adornment, or if you prefer it for the amusement of the
uncritical in a credulous age. Nor has Meve herself escaped
the searchlight of the solar critics. Our texts persistently
assert that she was very ambitious, as she was very compre-
hensive, in her views as to her rights in the matter of what is
called "her allowance of husbands." ("pefcuicite-o me-DtJA).
We were, tTierefore, not a little curious to ascertain what
B6 EARLY lEISH HISTORY.
place could be assigned to her in the solar mythology,
and we felt considerably relieved when the " mythologists,''
professing a confidence which we do not share, announced
to the world the startling discovery that she was a Dawn
Maiden ! ^^
^ The FoTir Masters do not g^ive any account of the Tain. Probably they
regarded it as a provincial war between Connact and Ulster, and not properly within
the scope of the Annals of the Kingdom, i.e., of the High Kingship. It is some-
times stated that they do not even mention Cuchulainn. This is not so. Under a.d.
1197, recording the death of Flaherty O'Muldory, lord of Cinel Couall, Owen and
Oriel, they say "hewasaConall in heroism, a Cuchulainn in valour, and a Guaire in
hospitality."
[ 87 ]
CHAPTER VII.
Finn mac Cumhail.
THE most celebrated event after the Tain, before the birth
of Christ, was the Togail, or destruction of the Hostel of
Da Derga and the murder of Conaire the Great. In the
time of the Red Branch Knights there were six principal
hostels in Erin, each situated at the meeting of four roads,
and comfortably endowed with lands sufficient to enable them
to extend gratuitous entertainment to the King, his officers,
and other wayfarers. Da Derga's Hostel was situated at
Donnybrook, where Bohernabruidne, the road from the
thrushes' glen (Glennasmoil), runs by the Dodder to the
mouth of the Liffey, and crosses the Slighe Cualan, which ran
from Dublin to Bray. A mound was levelled here in 1879, in
which were found large quantities of human bones flung in
heaps, as might be expected in the case of a hurried inter-
ment after a battle or massacre. This is supposed by
Ferguson^ and Joyce'' to represent the site of the hostel.
Conaire had reigned for twenty years at the time of his
murder (40 B.C.) during which time there were great bounties,
to wit : " Seven ships in every June arriving at Inver Colpa
and oak mast up to the knees in every autumn, and plenty of
fish in the Bush and the Boyne every June, and such abund-
ance of good will that no one slew another in Erin during his
reign. And to every one in Erin his fellow's voice seemed as
sweet as the strings of a lute. From mid-spring to mid-
autumn no wind disturbed a cow's tail. His reign was
neither thunderous nor stormy." We take the extract from a
very old Gaelic tale, the Bruden da Derga^ of great pathos
and beauty, which has been translated by Whitley Stokes, our
greatest Gaelic scholar, with his usual admirable felicity. The
reavers who killed the King were a band of outlaws, led by his
^ Ferguson has treated the subject in a spirited poem, Conary, which is
greatly admired by such a competent judge as Yates, " The best Irish poem of
any kind."
2 Joyce, Soc. Ir. II., 172.
» Bruden da Derga (Stokes) Ke/. Celt., xxii., 18,
88 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
foster brothers, the great grandsons of Donn Desa,the champ; on.
The King, though they were ''his brethren by the tie
of fosterage, for crimes that justly had demanded death, by
judgment mild sent them into banishment" After their
banishment they made league with Ingcel, son of the King of
Man, an outlaw like themselves, and in a marauding expedi-
tion for plunder in Bregia came upon the track of the King,
and followed him to the Hostel of Da Derga, which they
stormed, and there killed him.
It was probably the golden age we have described that
induced some writers to place the birth of Christ in the reign
of Conaire Mor. Others go further back, to the reign of
Fachtna Fathac. Keating places it in the twelfth year, and
the Four Masters in the eighth year of the reign of Chrim-
thann Nia Nair (a.m. 6,200). So we look in vain for the
certainty Tighernach is supposed to have found after the
time of Cimbaeth. Crimthann went on a famous expedition,
and wrote, as the legend goes, a poem of seventy-two lines
about it. It commences : " It was a good thing that I went
on that delightful adventure."* He was accompanied by his
fairy lover (lenne^n fi-oe) named Nair, whence he was
called Nair's hero (Hm-o). He brought back to his dun, on
the Hill of Howth, many things rare and valuable. We can
only mention a gilt chariot, a golden chessboard, inlaid with
a hundred transparent gems, the Cedach Grimthain, a beautiful
cloak, embroidered with gold, and two hounds, with a silver
chain between them which was worth a hundred cumhals.
The war of the Tain was followed by the rising of the
Firvolce. This revolt should rather, perhaps, be considered
as part of the struggle. The accounts that have reached us
are confused. The Four Masters speak of two risings, owing
probably, as frequently occurs, to the existence of two accounts
of the same series of events.^ We shall assume that there was
only one rising, followed by an intermittent struggle — a rising
of the Firvolce, aided certainly by the Clanna Rury, and not
improbably by other foes of the Eremonians.
The leader of the revolution was Cairbre Cinnceat.^ He was,
*i"llA "oo COT) A cAcctiA n-Aii. — Eortunate I went on that journey.
^ Tighernach has only one entry — " Cairpri Cindcait, 5 years til! he died."
^CAifipjie Cinn ceAc, CAi^p|ie cenn Cac fiAige aji if cac f o Ait e t bA
cenn i:oftt<« e. — Irische Text, Vol. Ill, 386.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL. 89
the Coir anmann tells us, "called CinnCeat, that is head of the
Cat-raige, since it was they reared him, and he was head over
them." Others say that he was of the Luaigni of Tara, and
that his genealogical origin was of the Firvolce, whereof the
Poet said :
Cairbre of the Firvolce without, treacherj',
The warrior of the Luaigni of Tara,
The name of his mastership without doubt
He got from the Cathraigi of Connact.
Another account was that the shape of a cat was on his shield,
and Eocaid Ua Floinn said he was with two cats' ears, and a
cat's fur between them. There were no cats, tame or wild, m
Erin at the time of this Revolution,'^ and the men of Erin
nowadays, whether friends or foes, would not be likely to call
a popular leader a kangaroo.
There is a legend written in the Book of Leinster, in very
' old Gaelic, commencing :
" "Who were the three persons who spake immediately after their
birth, and what did they say ? Morann was the son of Cairpri Cind-
cait. It was from this he was called it, because by this Cairpri were
killed the ' soerclann that were in Erin, for he was of the Aiieack I'uatka
of Erin, and he took the Kingship of Erin by force, and 'twas bad in
his reign, for there used to be only one grain on evei'y ear, and one
berry on the head of every stalk, and one acorn on the top of the oak
in his time."8
This, we think, must mean that he was called the head of the
CuACA CAC, because he was the successful leader of the re-
bellion of the Firvolce. The " Cath," or Cathraige were, as we
have mentioned in our first chapter, a numerous people extend-
ing from Inis-Scattery (Inif CAquige),^ in the mouth of the
T Hamilton, E. The Wild Cat of Europe, 76 (1896).
^mo](Ann, immono, rriAc CAijipjie cetro cAic i^ -oe ^lo tAb}iAfC4^ [feTje .i.
(ID iDAubcA teif in] Co|ip|ie bi|tin cec f oeti clAnn-o |io bot in h-eiiin, Aft bA oi
AceccuACAib b-etienn -00, oc«r t^o 5^^ T^'S^ tia h-et'enn A^t ecen ocuf t^op olc
A t^ije A|i ni bit) Acc oen g^iAmne 1 cin-o cecA x)efi -[ oen •oijicu a ccin-o nA
cuflen-oe 1 oen t)i|icu im multAC nA •oajiac in a jie. — L.L., p. r26b.
N.B. — The words in brackets are omitted through inadvertence in the
lithograph facsimile of the Book of Leinster, which makes the passage there
unintelligible.
^Scattery Inis is always written lni|' CAtAij ; but in the spoken lan-
guage was, no doubt, called lnnif CACiiAige, ex quo, Scattery. "The
Western Isles, were variously called Etleanna Bride, Hebrid, etc., and anciently
' Iniscead,' ' innis Cat,'' Isle of the Cat, Isle of the Catey. Probably the Catey
were the people who gave the name ' cataibh,' cat county, to Sutherland, and
Cat-inis, Cat-Ness, Caithness." — A. Carmichael, Carmena Gaedelica, Vol. I.,
Introduction, p. I.
90 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Shannon to the Hebrides, 1titi!> cac, and thence northwards
to Caithness The word Cathraige is not in any way connected
with Aitheach Tuatha, as is sometimes assumed. The word
" athi " is glossed " usvura" and is defined by Atkinson in his
valuable glossary to the Brehon Law Tracts, to mean " a return
for anything, retribution." So in the common phrase, d'aithe'^f'
indligid air," to avenge his illegality on him.^^* We suggest
that the Aitheach Tuatha were the tribes who, after their defeat^
were made subject to a punitive rent, or tribute, and thus dis-
tino-uished from " Saor Clanna," who were free from it.
The rising began with a massacre, it is said, which was
treacherously planned and carried out at a banquet. Accord-
ino- to some accounts an arrangement was come to by which an
Eremonian became High King, and Morann, the son of Cairbre,
Chief Justice. This was at the instance of the " very intelli-
gent " Morann, who sent to Alba the celebrated Udhact or
Will, for that purpose. He had a sin, or chain, called idh
Morainn which was a most useful adjunct in the administra-
tion of justice, the loss of which is to be deeply regretted.
When placed round the neck of a judge it almost choked
him if he was about to deliver a wrong judgment. It was
equally efficient when placed around the neck of a witness who
was about to give false evidence.
Finally Elim, of the Clanna Rury, became High King, and
reio-ned for 20 years at Tara. In the meantime the legend
tells us three of the nobles had escaped from the first massacre
at Mao-h Cro, near Knockma, in Galway, all being then infants
in their mother's womb, to wit — Feradach, from whom des-
cended the race of Conn of the Hundred Battles ; Tibraide
Tirech, from whom descended the Dal-araide, and Corb Olum,
from whom descended the kings of the Eoghanacht in Munster ;
and from a second supposed massacre at Magh Bolg, in Cavan ;
escaped also Tuathal, in the womb of Eithne, daughter of the
kino- of Alba. In a.d. 76 Tuathal, called Teachtmar, or the
legitimate, having arrived at man's estate, returned and fought
for Tara a battle at Aicill, in which Elim was defeated and
1" Feredach proceeded to extirpate the Aitheach Tuatha, or to put them
under creat rent and servitude, to revenge upon them the evil deed they had
done in murdering the nobihty of Eren." — O'Clerigh, Leabhar Gabhala, p. 136,
quoted by 0' Donovan, F.M., 1., 9G.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL. 91
slain. The Four Masters state that during the time of Elim
" God took vengeauce on the Aitheach Tuatha for their evil
deed. Erin was without corn, without fruit, without fish,
without everything that was good." Tuathal took possession
of Tara and became High King and reigned for thirty years.
He exacted from the chiefs of the Gael the same oath they had
taken to Ugaine Mor. They swore by the sun and the moon,
and the elements visible and invisible, that as long as the sea
surrounded Erin they would never contest the sovereignty
with him or his descendants. He fought many battles, some
say 188, against the Aitheach Tuatha, and re-established and
enlarged the boundaries of the " boardland " attached to Tara.
Roughly speaking, it extended from Birr to L. Boderg, on the
Shannon, to the north, and then eastwards from these points
to the sea.^^ On Leinster he imposed the tribute known as
the boroma (or cow-tax). The particulars of this tax are
variously stated, but all accounts agree in representing it as
oppressive. The most moderate is to be found in the
" duan," attributed to Adamnan, when the tax was re-
mitted at the prayer of St. Moling, by Finnachta Fleadhach
(673-693).
" Finachta, Donncadh's son, remitted at Moling's prayer
a mighty tribute. Thrice fifty hundred kine, with spancels,
and with each cow her calf was given." ^^ The amount appears
quite incredible when we consider that Leinster did not then
include East Meath, Westmeath, Louth, or Longford, and only
the southern parts of Dublin and the King's County. Not-
withstandinsf this remission it was afterwards claimed, and
Brian, who fell at Clontarf (1014 a.d.), has left a name con-
nected with the levying of this odious impost. Innumerable
battles were fought on the head of the boroma for nearly
1,000 years, and it is stated that the High King shared the
proceeds of the tax with Connact, Munster, and Oirghiall,
possibly only when they joined in the hosting to lift the
boroma.
The rest of Erin was as it were in league against unfortunate
^1 For an interesting examination in detail of the names and particulars of
Meath and the boardland, as given by Keating, see ""DeftAnceACT) riA ITlnDC." —
Gaelic Journal, Nov. 1900.
12 Keating (O'Mahony), p. 481. — The Ard Righ, however, had no power to
remit a cow rent, so as to bind his successors. He had only a life estate.
92 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Leinster, which was, consequently, driven to make alliance
with the invader. A Leinster poet sings —
" It is beyond the testimony of the Creator,
Beyond the word of supplicating Christ,
All the Kings of the Gael
That make attack on the Leinster men."
A silly story as to the origin of this tax is found in a mediae-
val romance known as the Boroma.^^ Tuathal, so the story
runs, had two daughters, Fithir, the elder and Darina, the
younger. Eocaidh, the son of Eocaidh Doimhlen, King of
Leinster, who then resided near Lugnaquilla, in Wicklow,
visited Tara, and asked the elder sister in marriage, it not
being the custom to wed the younger before the elder in Erin
at that time. When he took home his bride, the Leinster men
told him the younger sister was better. So, after some time
he went back to Tara, a day's journey only from Lugnaquilla,
and said that his wife had died, and asked, and got in mar-
riage, the younger sister, Darina. After Eocaidh took her
home, the two sisters met, and the elder died of shame and
the younger of grief. For this war was declared, and the
tax imposed, and levied as an eric and a punishment. This
is a type of many absurd stories to be found in Keating, the
Dindsenchus, and the Coir Anmann. It is, of course, the old
story of Procne and Philomela. Pandion, King of Athens, their
father, gave Procne in marriage to Tereus, King of Daulis in
Thrace, in return for aid rendered him in war. Tereus, how-
ever, being enamoured of Philomela, feigned that Procne was
dead, and induced Philomela to take her place. When the
latter discovered the truth, he cut out her tongue to prevent
her from revealing it, but she depicted her sad story on a robe
which she sent to Procne, and both took a terrible revenge on
Tereus. Procne was changed by the pitying gods into a
swallow, and Philomela into a nightingale, and Pandion died
of grief.
One incident of this war of Hate connected with the Boroma
may be mentioned here. In A.D. 246 (F.M.), Dunlang, son of
^3 " Boroma," T. O. Russell, preface. Boroma is translated into modem
Gaelic by T. O'Russell, and into Enghsh by W. Stokes, Rev. Celtique, vol.
xiii.-23.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL.
)3
Enna Niadh, King of Leinster, made a raid on Tara. Then
ensued the massacre of the maidens at the Cluainfearta (the
western slope of) Tara. Thirty Royal maidens was the
number, and ahundred maids with each of them. Twelve princes
of the Leinster men did Cormac (MacArt) put to death to-
gether in revenge of that massacre, together with an exaction
of the Boroma, with an increase after Tuathal (F.M.) ^*
After a reign of 36 years, Tuathal was slain in the battle of
Moin an Catha in Dal-Araidhe, by Mai, of the Clanna Rury,
King of Ulster, who, thereupon, took possession of Tara, and
became High King, and reigned four years. He was suc-
ceeded by Feidlimid Reachtmhar, the son of Tuathal, and on
his death Cathaoir Mor, of Leinster, became High King.
Cathaoir was of the line of Eremon, and was descended from
Ugaine Mor, through Laoghaire Lore, in the thirtieth genera-
tion. The succession was, however, contested by Conn of the
Hundred Battles, son of Feidlimid Reachtmhar, who was also
descended from Ugaine Mor, through Cobthach Cail Breagh,
the elder brother of Laoghaire Lore.
A battle was fought between the rival claimants at Magh
Agha, or Tailtin, in which Cathaoir Mor was defeated and
slain, and Conn became High King. On the day of his birth,
say our texts, five roads were " discovered " leading from Tara.
The Slighe Midluachra, to the north, probably towards the
Moyry Pass ; the Siighe Cualann, to the south-east, towards
Dublin and Bray ; the Slighe Dala, to the south-west, towards
Ossory ; the Slighe Assail, to the west towards Mullingar ; and
the Slighe Mor, westwards, also by the Eiscir Riada, to Gal-
way. Conn was thus provided with highways to advance on
every side within striking distance of the foe.
One hundred fights in Mumha wide,
Conn Cead Catha, the just, had fought.
One hundred 'gainst the Ulla brave,
And sixty fights 'gainst Laighen's sons.
At the accession of Conn (A.D. 123) there were three divi-
sions of the Gael in Munster — the Eberians (Dergthine), repre-
sented by Mogh Niad, the ruling king, who was the father of
^*Oae is reminded of the massacre of the school children in Boeotia during
the Peloponesian war recorded by Thucydides, which filled all Greece with
horror and indignation.
94 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Eogan Mor the first, also called Mogh Nuadat ; the Ithians
(Darini), represented by Mac Niad, the father of Lugaid mac
Conn ; and the Erneans, an Eremonian offshoot from Ulster,
represented by Mogh Lamha and his son Conaire. Between
these divisions there was sometimes peace, but more fre-
quently war. An arrangement come to there between the
Eberians and the Ithians at one time deserves notice. When
the kingship was with one division then the Brehonship and
the Tanistship was with the other m alternate succession, so
that on the death of Mogh Niad, the Eberian king, the Ithian
Lugaid mac Conn, the son of Mac Niad, would be entitled to
succeed him as king of Munster.^^
When the sovereignty was divided the Eberians held South
Munster, the Degadians North Munster. Curigh mac Dara
was king of the Degadians or Erneans. Mogh Lamha and Con-
aire. Conn's son-in-jaw, afterwards succeeded to Curigh. Tho
Darini were of the line of Lugaid, the son of Ith.
Eogan Mor had been fostered by Dari Barrach, the son of
Cathaoir Mor, and with his aid he engaged in a struggle with
Conn, which lasted many years, and having worsted him in
ten battles, they agreed to divide Erin between them, as wo
have already stated, and though Eogan was routed and slain
at Magh Leana the Eberians from that time forth obtained the
dominant power m Munster. ^^^ Eogan Mor left one son, OlioU
Glum,
Conn had three sons, and also three daughters,!each of whom
became the wife or the mother of a H igh King. The eldest Main
was married to Fiacaid of Ulster. Her son Fergus Dubh-
dedach became Ard Righ. Conn's second daughter Saraid mar-
ried Conaire. He became High King. His third daughter Sadb
(Sive) married, first, Mac Niad the Ithian, and her son Lugaid
15 The Eberiatk line at this time ran thus- (1) Dergthine ; (2) Derg ;
(3) Mogh Niad ; (4) Eog.xn Mor I. or Mogh Nuadath , (5) Oiioll 01am ;
(6] Eogan Mor II. Fiacha Fermara of the Hue of Eremon, sou of Aengus Tuir-
mech (Ard Righ, 384 B.C* had a son Ohld Eraun. His descendants were called
Erneans, though quite distinct from the Firvolcic tribe of that name. These
afterwards took the name of Dal Fiatach in Ulster, and a branch of them that
settled in Munster took the name of Clanna Degaid. The latter had been
driven from Ulster by the Clanna Kury when Duaeh was Ar J Righ. Duach, of
the Une of Eber, was the foster son of Degaid (the grandson cf Olild Eiaun),
who was the chief of the Dal Fiatach. When they were expelled Duach gave
them lands in Munster and Degaid became king of Munster on Duach's death
and his clan were thenceforth called the Clanna Degaid.
^'^ An. Clonmac^ Murphy, S. J., 58.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL. 95
mac Conn became High King, On Mac Niad's death Sadb mar-
ried Olioll 01um= She bore him nine sons, of whom we need
only mention three — Eogan Moi, Cormac Cas, and Cian. The
position of the Ebenans in Munster was strengthened and
secured by the marriage of OUoli with Conn's daughter, '' by
which means they {i.e., the Ebenans in Munster) have gotten
themselves that selected and choice name much used by the
Irish poets at the time of their commendations and praises,
Sit SAiT)t>, which is as much in English as the issue of Sadb '*
After the battle of Magh Leana, Conn, having slain or van°
quished his enemies, reigned peaceablv and quietly, with great
increase and plenty of all good things amongst his subjects
throughout the kingdom, so that all in general had no wants
until the king's brothers sent privy message to Tibraide
Tireach, son of Mai, who was slain by Conn's father, whereupon
Tibraide, with a willing heart, came up to Tara accompanied
with certain other malefactors, assaulted the king unawares,
and wilfully killed him in the hundredth year of his age as
he was making preparations towards the great feast of Tara
(A.D. 173). He was succeeded by his son-in-law Conaire, who,
after reigning eight years, was slain by Neimid king of the
Erneans of Munster. Saraid had borne Conaire three sons, the
three Cairbres — Cairbre Muse, Cairbre Baoiscaein, and Cairbre
Riada.
Conn,
Art, Conn la, Criaa, three sons
and
Main = Fiacaid, Saraid = Conaire, Sadb = {1st) Mac Niad, three daughters
I I i
Cairbre Muse, Lugaid mac Conn,
Cairbre Baoiscaein, Sadb = (2nd) Olioll Olum
Cairbre Eiada i
Fiacaid Maoil-lethan
Eogan Mor, Cormac Cas, Cian,
I i
Tadg, ex quo
Dal Caa. O'Carroils of Ely.
O'Meaghers of Ikerron,
O'Cathasaigh of Magh
Breagh.
O'Connors of Glengiven,
Barony of Keeuaght,
Olioll Olum left the kingship of Munster to Cormac Cas,
and on his death to Fiacha Maoil-lethan, and then to their
descendants in alternate rule. The Dalriada of North Antrim
96 EARLY IRISH HISTORY
and of Scotland, descended from Cairbre Riada, i,e , fliog ^a-oa,
of the long forearm. Bede says ; — " The Scot or Gael under
the leadership of lleuda, proceeding from Hibernia, by the
sword or amicably, won for themselves a settlement amongst
the Picts.' A. second settlement of the Dalriada was made
under the sons of Ere three hundred years afterwards. Argyle
is = Airer Gaeidheal — the district of the Gael, or Airthear
Gaedhil, the Eastern Gael, which we prefer.
A place may be found here for saying something about the
genealogy of the Gael, on which Hyde has a valuable and in-
teresting chapter in the " Literature " These pedigrees of the
Gael go back to one or other of the four aponymi — the uncle,
the two brothers, or the nephew,
The pedigrees of the Ithians seem to meet in Lugaid mac
Conn, the grandson of Conn, his mother being Sadb.
The Eberians converge on Olioil Olum and spring from
Eogan Mor, Cormac Cas, and Cian, the grandsons also of Conn,
their mother being Sadb.
In the line of Eremon are found pedigrees which meet con-
siderably before the Birth of Christ. The Dalriada of Alba
join the O'Neills as much as 430 years B C, and the O'Cave-
naghs in a more remote period m the reign of Ugaine Mor
(630 B.C.). The main points of convergence, however, are in
Cairbre of the Litfey (25S A.D.) the great grandson of Conn,
and Niall of the Nine Hostages (379 A.D.) seventh in descent
from Conn.
The Irians converge on Conall Cearnach and Fergus Mac
Roigh, the heroes of the Red Branch, and were generally
called the Clanna Rury, from Ruidhraighe, who was Ard
Righ 288 B.C. Subject to reservations for interpolations and
such like infirmities in individual cases these pedigrees may
be taken as fairly authentic from the points of convergence
indicated."
The truth or falsehood of these pedigrees is, however, of
little importance in comparison to the evil they did in con-
junction with other causes in keeping the people divided into
four clans or factions, attached to each of which were numerous
sub- divisions. The Gael remained a clansman when he ought
to have been a patriot, and Erin continued to be a " trembling
" See Hyde, " Literature," p. GO.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL. 97
sod" when it ought to have become a homogeneous and har-
monious nation.
Of the three sons of Conn, Connla and Crinna were murdered
by their uncles, Eocaid Finn and Fiacaid Luighde ; and Art,
known as Aenfer [the Single One (left)], succeeded his father as
High King. In the twenty-first year of his reign (186) a great
battle was fought at Ceannfeabhrat, near Kilmallock, in Lime-
rick, between the Eremonians of Munster on the one side, and
the Darini (Ithian) and the Erneans on the other. The three
Cairbres and the sons of OlioU Olum led the former against
Neimid, son of Srobceann, King of the Erneans, and Lugaid
mac Conn, chief, and Dadera, wizard, of the Darini.^^ The
Eremonians were victorious. Eogan, the son of Olioll, slew
Dadera the wizard. Cairbre Riogfada slew Neimid in revenge
for his father, and Cairbre Muse wounded Lugaid mac Conn in
the thigh, so that he was lame ever afterwards. Lugaid fled
with his friends to Britain, and aided by the King of Britain
in the year 195 A.D. returned to Erin to claim the High
Kingship. He landed in Galway, and a fierce battle was fought
at Magh Mucrirmhe, near Atheury, about twelve miles east of
Galway. Victory declared for Lugaid. Art Aenfer was slain
by Lugaid Laga, and seven of the sons of Olioll Olum fell
fighting. Lugaid then marched to Tara and took possession
of the High Kingship, which he held for thirty years, when
he fell by the spear of an assassin.
Towards the close of his reign Cormac mac Art, the grand-
son of Conn, disputed his right and drove him from Tara. On
the death of Lugaid mac Conn, he was succeeded by Fergus " of
the Black Teeth" (226). Cormac then fought a decisive
battle at Crinna, near Stackallen Bridge, on the Boyne. Fer-
gus and his two brothers, Fergus the Long-haired and Fergus
the Fiery of the Crooked Teeth, fell by the hand of the re-
nowned champion Lugaid Laga, the brother of Olioll Olum.
Cormac was also assisted by the forces of Tadg, the son of Cian,
the son of Olioll Olum, who then ruled in Ely.
Cormac rewarded the followers of Tadg (the Cianachta) with
the fertile lands lying between the Liffey and Dromiskin in
Louth. He reigned for forty years and fought as many battles
^8 The Four Masters have -oiiai "OAttine, the dniid or wizard of the Darini.
Tighernach has -ojioch "OAinne, Darini's buffoon. Stokes, Rev. Celt., xvii. i.
H
98 EAELY IRISH HISTORY.
as his grandfather Conn, in Ulster, Connacht, Munster, and
Leinster. Tighernach mentions " the great fleet of Cormac,
son of Art, over the sea plain for the space of three years."
So we may infer that his warlike operations were not confined
to his own country.^^ A celebrated event of this time was the
blinding of Cormac by Aengus Gaibuaibteach. The oldest
version of the story is to be read in the introduction to the
Book of Aicill. Cellach, the king's son, had abducted the
daughter of Sorar, who was a kinsman of Aengus. Aengus
went afterwards as champion of his territory to avenge a tribal
wrong into Luighne, Sligo. He entered a woman's house
there and drank the milk in spite of her. " 'Twould be fitter
for you," said she, " to avenge the daughter of Sorar your kins-
man on Cellach than to take my victuals by force." No book
mentions that he did any harm to the woman, but he fared
forth to Tara, which he reached after sunset. Now it was a
" geis " to bring a warrior's arms into Tara after sunset in
addition to the arms in it. So Aengus took the ornamental
spear of Cormac down from the rack and made a stroke of it
at Cellach and killed him. And the edge of it grazed one of
Cormac's eyes and destroyed it. Now it was a " geis " for a
king with a blemish to be at Tara, so Cormac was sent to
Aicill, hard by, to be cured, and the kingship was given to his
son Cairbre-Liffechair, and in every difficult case he used to go
to consult Cormac, and Cormac used to say, " My son, that thou
mayest know," and explain the exemptions. In this way, it
is said, the Book of Aicill on crimes and torts was mainly com-
posed, to which we shall refer hereafter, as well as to his court
at Tara. Legend also says that he composed for the instruc-
tion of Cairbre the " Teaching of a King " (Ue^sAfg tlioj),
" which book contains as goodly precepts and moral documents
as Aristotle and Cato did ever write." The instruction is bv
way of question and answer. For instance, Cairbre asks him,
" O grandson of Conn, how shall I distinguish the character
^8 The migrations and out settlements of the Gael in Erin in Christian times
are very remarkable. The descendants of Cian. the third son of Olioll Olum,
for instance, occupied Ely (South King's County and North Tipperary);
Ciarmachta Ereagh, above-mentioned ; the tribeland of the O'Conor's at Glen-
given in Londonderry ; the two Galengas in Meath and Connacht ; and the two
Luighnes — Lune in Meath and Layny in Sligo.
FINN MAC CTTMHAIL. 99
of women ? " * "I know them," answers Cormac, " But I cannot
describe them. Their counsel is foolish, they are forgetful
of love, most headstrong in their desires, fond of folly, prone
to enter rashly into engagements, given to swearing, proud to
be asked in marriage, tenacious of enmity, cheerless at the
banquet, rejectors of reconciliation, prone to strife, of much
garrulity. Until evil be good, until hell be heaven, until the
sun hides its light, until the stars of heaven fall, women will
remain as we have stated. Woe to him, my son, who desires
or serves a bad woman. Woe to everyone who has got a bad
wife." ^^ Cormac also collected, the legend says, the chroniclers
of Erin at Tara, and ordered them to write the Chronicles of
Erin in one book, which was called the Psaltair of Tara. In
that book were written the general exploits of the kings of
Erin and of the synchronous kings and emperors of the world,
and of the kings of the provinces, etc. There is a Psaltair of
Tara, which is referred to by Cuan O Lochain ( + 1024) and has
perished injuria temporis, but it was not compiled in Cormac's
time, as Ogham was the only writing then known and used.
The year after he was wounded he died at Cleiteach, near
Aicill, on the Boyne. " The bone of a salmon stuck in his
throat ; or it was the elves that destroyed him after he was
betrayed by Moelceann, the wizard, since Cormac did not be-
lieve in him." ^^
In the time of Cormac flourished Finn MacCumhall,^
(MacCool) the most renowned of the Gael in legend and
romance with the exception of Cuchulainn. The story of
Finn's parentage is told in a tale entitled " The Cause of the
Battle of Cnucha." In order to give our readers an idea of
the austere simplicity of its style, as well as for the interesting
20/4MC. Law. III. 82.
2^ Our fair readers will readily perceive that this acrid effusion proceeded
from one who had no real knowledge of the " ministering aii;.'el," and could not
have been the teaching of a wise and experienced monarch like Cormac. We
should attribute it to some sour old monk who had disappointments in early life,
and was run down in condition towards the end of Lent.
22Tighernach, Rev. Celt., 3;vii..20.
^^lAnn, genitive, feine, a noun of multitude. Fianna were bands of
snilitia. Fennidbe was the individual Fenian, and is not connected with Finn.
100 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
views of society it presents, we shall ^ive it slightly
abridged in a literal translation ot the original : —
When Cathaoir Mor was in the kingship of Tara, and Conn Ced
Cathach, in Kells, in the rigdatnna's land,^he had a celebrated wizard,
ISTuada, of the Tuatha Dathi, in Bregia. The wisard was soliciting
land at Leinster, from Cathaoir, for he knew that it was in Leinster
his success orship would be. Cathaoir gave him his choice of land.
The land the wizard chose was Almu (the Hill of Allen in Kildare).
She that was wife to Nuada was Almu, daughter of Becan. Nuada
had a distinguished son, to wit, Tadg. Rairin, daughter of Dond-
duma, was his wife. A celebrated wizard also was Tadg. Death
came to Nuada ; and he left his dun as it was to his son, and it is
Tadg that was wizard to Cathaoir in the place of his father. Kairin
bore a daughter to Tadg, i.e., Murni Muncaim (of the fair neck) her
name. The maiden grew up in great beauty, so that the sons of the
kings and mighty lords of Erin were wont to be courting her. Cumal,
son of Trenmor, commander of the Fianna of Erin, was Conn's
righthand man. He was also, like everyone else, asking for the
maiden. [Tadg, the son of] Nuada, gave him a refusal, for he knew
that it was on account of him (Cumal) that he would have to leave
Almu. The same woman was mother to Cumal and to Conn's father,
to wit, Feidlimid Rechtaide.
Cumal comes, however, and takes Murni in spite of him, in elope-
ment with him, since she was not given to him before. Tadg comes to
Conn, and tells him how he has been outraged by Cumal, and began to
stir him up, and to reproach him. Conn sends word to Cumal, and
tells him to quit Erin or give the girl back to Tadg. Cumal said that
he would not give her ; that he would give anj^thing if it was not the
woman. Conn sent his soldiers, and tJigrend, the King of Lu;agni,
and Daire Derc, and his son Aed, who was afterwards called Goll, to
attack Cumal. Cumal musters his forces against them, and the battle
of Cnucha is fought between them, and Cumal is slain in it, and his
people are slaughtered. Cumal fell by Goll, the son of Morna.
Luchet wounded Goll in the eye, so that he destroyed his eye, and
hence it is that " Goll " (blind of one eye) attached to him. Goll
killed Luchet. It is for that reason, moreover, that the blood feud
(fich bunaid) was between the sons of Morna and Finn. Daire (Derc)
had two names, Daire and Morna. Murni went after that to Conn,
since her father rejected her, and did not let her come to him because
she was pregnant ; and he said to his people to burn her, and yet he
dare not destroy her for fear of Conn.^. The girl was asking Conn
^ Ri^damna means royal material, the persons eligible for kingship. Here
it probably means Tanist, who had a separate establishment at Kells.
-^Hennessy cites from L.L. : — " Ba bes itossaig nach ingen dognid bais dar
cenna urnaidm do breothad." It was the custom at first to burn any woman
who did lust in violation of her compact. This was the law with the Teutons
also.
Murni's father, in his anger, evidently thought that she was a consenting
•oarty to the abduction*
FIKK MAC CUMHAIL. 101
what she -would do. Said Conn, " Go to Fiacal, the son of Concend, to
Temair Marci, and let thy delivery be there (for Cumal's sister was
Fiacal's wife)." Connla, Conn's gillie, went with her to protect her
until they came to Fiacal's house. Welcome was given to her there,
and 'twas a good thing she came. She was brought to bed there, and
boie a son, and Demni was given as a name to him. The boy was
reared by them after, until he was able to spoil everyone that was a
foe to him. He then proclaimed battle or single combat against
Tadg, or that full eric for his father be given to him. Tadg said he
would give him an award (of judges). The award was given, and this
is the award that was given to him, to wit, that Almu should be ceded
to him, for ever, and Tadg to leave it. It was done so. Finn went
afterwards to Almu, and lived there, and the dun was his home (arus
bunaid) while he lived.*.
Finn had another " dun " at Magh Ella (Moyelly), in the
King's County.'^^
After the Gailedm of Leinster had heen placed under tribute
by Tuathal, as we have stated, the Eremonians became masters
of the province. The chief families of Leinster — O'Connor
Falghi, O'Cavanagh, 0' Toole, O'Byrne, Mac Gilla Patrick,
O'Dun, O'Dempsey, O'Dwyer, O'Ryan, and all the septs that
trace their origin to them — were descended from Labraid
Loingseach. The O'Nolans were descended from his brother
Cobthach. All these Eremonians could not have been intro-
duced without displacing and ousting the old occupiers out of
most, if not all, of their territory, and this could not have been
accomplished without a numerous and well organised militia.
^ Fotha Catha Cnucha, Castleknock, near Dublin (leb^ji tia hvii-o^e, p. 47)
Revue CeJique II., 86, and translation by Hemiessy, which we have generally
followed.
^ There are two hills in Kaldare with similar names. One is Kuockaillinn
(Cnoc AilleAtin), so called, it is supposed, from the ail or stone, which was
placed on the mound of the rath. It is five or six miles south of Newbridge, in
Kildare ; is 600 feet high, and on its summit is the largest of the Irish raths.
The top of the hill is surrounded by a mighty rampart of earth, 400 yards in
diameter, that encloses over twenty acres. Some think it was on this hill that
Finn's dun was situated. About eight or nine miles north of this, and five miles
north of Kildare, is another hill — the Hill of Allen (Cnoc AtmAine, nom. case,
ALtiiu or ALriiA. On this hiU there are no traces of any dun or rampart, and
the top is only half an acre in extent, Both occur in a line quoted by Four
Masters, A D., 904. Iiac tiomf a Cnoc AtniAine Aj;«f AitleAnn cen occa —
Sorrowful to me the hills of Almhuin (Allen) and Ailleann without soldiers.
Russell, in his interesting article on Knock Aillinn, suggests that the two hills,
Ailhnn and Almhuin, got confounded at an early period. — Finn's " Dun " was
known from far back times as Almhuin Eiogha, lethan, mor Laighean^The
kingly, great, broad Allen of Leinster. — Russell, T. O. " Beauties and Antiquities
of Ireland."— p. 116.
102 Early irish history.
It was probably accomplished gradually and on the same con-
ditions as the plantation of the Eremonians in Connacht was
effected. The new settlers in Connacht, we are told in the
Book of Rights, went under the same rent or tribute that was
payable by their predecessors in occupation, and we have seen
that Cormac, after the massacre of the maidens at Tara, exacted
the " boroma " with an increase.^
This militia was called Fiann or Fianna, and it was pro-
bably by their aid that Cathaoir Mor took possession of Tara and
the High Kingship. In 122 B.C. Cathaoir was slain by Conn
and Crimthann, the son of Niadcort, was placed by him in the
chieftaincy of Leinster to the exclusion of the line of Cathaoir,
to which Baoisgne, who then commanded the Fianna, belonged.
They were called the Clanna Baoisgne. Cumhal, the grandson
of Baoisgne, determined, at the head of the Fianna, to restore
the race of Cathaoir to power. He formed an alliance with the
men of Munster and gave battle to Conn at Cnucha, where
he was slain by Goll mac Morna, commander of Fianna of
Connacht — the Clanna Morna — and his army utterly routed, as
the tale relates. When Finn grew up, he also, like Baoisgne
and Cumhal, became commander of the Clanna Baoisgne, and
«' there was strife and variance between him and Cormac."
They made up their quarrel, apparently, and Cormac gave
Finn his daughter Grainne in marriage, and the first part of
his nuptial reign was peaceful. War, however, soon broke out
between Finn and Grainne. According to the story told in
an old text, " When Finn went to woo Grainne she told him
she would take no bride-price from him but a pair of every wild
animal in Erin, to be given to her in one drive until they were
at the north of Tara." Caoilte of the Swift Foot accomplished
this. Grainne then married Finn, but retained her hatred of
him.
She had, however, already fixed her love on Diarmuid
O'Duibhne, of the curly, dusky black hair, with the love spot
(tJAtl f eii^ce) that no heart could resist. In the gloss on the
^ Book of Rights. — "The Hy Maine were permitterl by Duach, King of
Connacht, to subdue the Firvolce, who paid the tribute of an enslaved people.
The former, therefore, were obUged to pay the same tribute, though they were
considered noble as being of the race of Conn of the Hundred Battles." — O'D.
Maini, chief of the new Plantation, was the fourth in descent from CoUa da Crioch.
teAbAtAtiA ^ceA\\v.—0' Donovan, p. 106.
FINN MAC CTJMHAIL. 103
Amra Columcille Grainne is quoted as saying, referring, no
doubt, to Diarmuid : —
There is a man
For a long look from whom I would be thankful,
For whom I would give the whole world,
The whole, the whole, though it be deception.^
She eloped with Diarmuid, and the pursuit of Diarmuid
and Grainne by Finn, is the most famous and popular romance
in the Ossianic cycle of our literature.
The statements contained in Keating as to the organization
of the Fianna of Erin are unsupported by trustworthy evidence,
and are in a large part incredible. They were presumably
derived from romance writers of the Ossianic cycle or from
traditions which were probably derived from the same source.
We find in the Egerton MS., a volume of the fifteenth century
in the British museum, edited and translated by S. H. O'Grady
in the " Silva," an enumeration and description of Finn's people.
" Their strength was 130 warriors, each having 27 warriors, every
one bound, as was the way with Cuchulainn, to conditions
which were that they should not accept damages for an insult,
should not refuse anyone money or food, and one man should
not fly from nine foes."
No eric was to be given or taken where a Fennidhe was
concerned. No man was to be taken until he was a prime poet,
versed in the twelve books of poetry ! No man was taken
®" Ocuf 5f Aline cecinic."
pit ■o«itie
•pt^if mAx> buitje temm ■oiti'oefc
AttA cib]iitTO in tribic n'huiLe,
n'Vitiite, n'huile cix) -oiubetic
The text edited by Dr. Stokes gives the last line thns : —
" A meic mAiT«e, C1-0 -oiubetii;," which he renders ;
" O, Son of Mary, though it be a privation."
We think the " O Son of Mary," is the exclamation of a horrified monk,
which crept from the margin into the text. Grainne had not heard of the " Son
of Mary."
Dr. Stokes renders •oiubetic, privation. It may mean also deception or
fraud. See Windisch, sub-voce. Some of the texts, e.g., that given by Kuno
Meyer, have «c xiicii: gfAinne ptii pionn, instead of cecinic. This must mean,
we think, not said io Fionn as he renders it, but against Fionn. This is the
oldest reference to Diarmuid and Grainne in our texts. The oldest text of the
tale, according to M. D'Arbois, is of the date 1736. The redaction of S. H.
O'Grady ia partly from a text of 1780 and partly from one of 1842-3.
"Amra Choluimbchille," ed. W. Stokes, Rev. Celt., 20 p 156.
104 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
until in the ground a large hole was made, and he was put
into it with a shield and a forearm length of a hazel stick.
Then nine men at nine furrows distance were to hurl at the
same time two spears at him. If he was wounded he was
rejected and so forth ! The man who had the Fianna with
him was the seventh King of Erin. The privileges of Finn
are described in another tract (cited in Oss. Soc. Trans, vol. 1,
p. 43). He was entitled to a cantred in every province, a town-
land in every cantred, and a house in every townland, and to
have a hound reared in any house. He was entitled to quar-
ter the seven battalions on the country, from Samhaim to
Bealtaine (November to May), and they were to enjoy hunt-
ing and fishing, and to use all ripe and edible fruits from
Bealtaine to Samhain. No one was to dare to give his daughter
in marriage without asking three times if there was a Fennidhe
ready to marry her, and if there was to him should she be given.
No person could take a salmon, a fawn, or any smaller game,
even if he found them dead, unless one of the Fianna.^*' These
are, as Nutt observes, " fancy pictures traced by bards whose
vision of the distant past was undisturbed by any real know-
ledge." ^^ Keating gives the following interesting particulars,
handed down by tradition to his time (c. 1644) : — " During the
whole day, that is from morning till night, they ate but one
meal, of which they were wont to partake towards evening.
About noon it was their custom to send whatever game they
had killed in the morning by their attendants to some ap-
pointed hill where there should be a convenience of wood and
moorland. There they used to light immense fires, into which
they put a large quantity of round sandstones. They next
dug two pits in the yellow clay of the moor, and, having set
part of the venison upon the spits to be roasted before the fire,
they bound up the remainder with su^rc^ws in bundles of sedge,
which they placed to be cooked in one of the pits they had
previously dug. There they set round them the stones
that had been heated in the fire, and kept heaping them on
the bundles of meat until they had made them seethe freely,
and the meat had been thoroughly cooked." In the evening
the Fianna used to gather round the second of the pits, " and
^°Coi|ii5eAcc SAT)b injeAn eogAin 6^15. — Oss. Soc, vol. i., p. 41.
^^ Ossian and the Ossianic literature, p. 35.
FINN MAC CUMHAIL. 105
there every man stripped himself to his skin, tied his tunic
round his waist, and then set to dressing his hair and cleansing
his limbs. They then began to supple their thews and muscles
by gentle exercise, loosening them by friction until they had
relieved themselves from all sense of stiifness and fatigue.
When they had accomplished this they sat down and ate their
meal." Their beds were of brushwood, laid next to the ground,
over this was laid moss, and fresh rushes were spread on top.
These were the Three beddings of the Fiann, " Tri Cuillcedha
na Fiann." Every Fennidhe took a military oath on his arms
of valour to the ri-Feinnedh, or commander, before whom was
borne to battle the standard known as " Gal greine," or sun-
burst. =^2
Finn was assassinated by Aichleach and the sons of Uir-
greann, of the Luigni of Tara, at Ath Brea, on the Boyne where
he had retired in his old age to pass the remainder of his life in
tranquility. It was by the aid of the Luigni, of Tara, that Conn
defeated Cathaoir Mor, who was supported by the Clanna
Baoisgne, and the murder of Finn was, doubtless, an incident
in the blood feud which revived in all its bitterness when
Cormac's daughter dishonoured and betrayed the King of the
Fianna. Finn left amongst other children a daughter Sam-
hair, married to Cormac Cas, King of Munster, to whom she
bore Mogh Corb, his successor. This union cemented an old
alliance between the Clanna Baoisgne and the men of Munster.
Finn left also a son, Oisin, who succeeded him in the leader-
ship of the Fianna of Leinster. They were in favour of the
claims of the lineal descendants of Cathaoir Mor and opposed
to the dynasty reigning in that province. Cairbre Liffechair
becameArd Righ in A.D. 268, and supported the reigning King.
In 271 he fought three battles against the men of Munster in
defence of the rights of Leinster ; in 272 he fought four battles
against the men of Munster in defence of the rights of Leinster.
Cairbre was defending the rights of the monarch in opposition
to the rival claims of the line of Cathaoir Mor, aided by the
men of Munster.
In the year after the death of Finn (284 A.D.) the decisive
battle was fought at Gabra (Gowra), near the hill of Skreen,
^Keating (O'Mahony), p. 346, and Oss. Soc. vols., p. 41.
106 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
which is close to Tara. Oisin commanded the Clanna Baoisgne,
and the Munster men fought under their King, Mogh Corb.
The allied forces took the offensive boldly. The attack was,
no doubt, sudden. It was an effort to succeed by surprise, a
counter-stroke in defensive warfare, which, if successful, would
have made them masters of Tara and of the High Kingship.
The men of Erin were led by Cairbre. It was the duty of
the High King of the Gael not only to command in person,
but to fight in the forefront of the battle, which, no doubt, ex-
plains why so many Kings perished by the sword. He was
aided by the Clanna Morna, who were commanded by Aed
Caem, the son oi Garaidh Glunduff, the son of Goll Mac Morna,
and the last Firvolcic King of Connact. According to one
account, Cairbre and Oscar, the son of Oisin, met in single
combat, fighting on horseback, and Oscar fell to the spear oi
Cairbre, who, in turn, received from Oscar a mortal wound
from which he soon expired. Another version is that, return-
ing victorious and wounded after the fight with Oscar, he was
set on by Simeon, one of the Fotharthaigh, who had been
expelled into Leinster, and despatched with a single blow.
The carnage on both sides was terrible. Before the monarch
fell, a poem in the Book of Leinster says, the dead were more
numerous than the living on the field ; and in after times,
poetic tradition had it that Oisin and Caoilte alone survived
of the famous Fianna of Leinster, and lived until the coming
of St. Patrick. He met them in their old age, and his conver-
sation with them, the Agallamh na Senorach [The Talk with
the Old Men] is the longest and most interesting tale in
the Ossianic Cycle.^^
^ Irische Texte, III, 141, and Silva Gaedelica.
[ 107 ]
CHAPTER VIII.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL.
AFTER the battle of Gabhra (284), the most important event
was the invasion of Ulster by the three CoUas. Three
hundred years had now elapsed since the Tain, and durinsf
that time the power of the Clanna Rury had been declining,
and the hour was now approaching when they would be obliged
to fight, not for conquest, but for defending their capital.
Cairbre Liffechair had two sons, Fiacha Sraibtaine and
Eocaid Doimhlen. Fiacha succeeded him, but whether he
was the elder son or not we cannot say. Eocaid Doimhlen
left three sons, CoUa Uais the Noble, Colla Meann the Stam-
merer, and Colla da Crioch. After Fiacha had held the
sovereignty for thirty-seven years, the CoUas rose in rebellion
against him, and slew him at the battle of Dubhcomar, near
bhe confluence of the Boyne and the Blackwater (322 A.D.)
Colla Uais then became High King, and reigned four years,
when he was dethroned and expelled from the Kingdom into
Alba, by Tireach, the son of Fiacha Sraibtaine, who then as-
cended the throne ; shortly afterwards Muiredach and his
cousins made up their quarrel, and the Collas returned from Alba.
A large army was mustered for the invasion of Ulster, com-
posed of the forces of the High King, of the King of Connacht,
and of a body of soldiers from Alba. A fierce battle was fought
(332 A.D.) at Carn-acha-leath-dheirg, near Carrickmacross, in
Farney, and the three Collas, having routed the men of Ulster,
" seized Emania and burned it, and the Ulstermen did not
dwell there since." Fergus Fogha, the King, was slain, and
the Clanna Rury driven eastward into little Ulster — Ulidia,
the present counties of Down and Antrim. The western
boundary of Little Ulster was the course of the Lower Bann,
Lough Neagh, and Gleann Righe, now the valley of the Newry
River. Through this valley the Ulidians constructed a great
rampart, now commonly called the " Dane's Cast." It extends
from Lisgoole, near Scarva, in Down, to near Meigh and Slieve
108 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Gullion, in Armagh, a distance, as the "Cast" runs, of over
twenty miles. This earthwork, which consisted of a fosse or
ditch, and a rampart on either side, was not in one continuous
line, but in separate sections, that stretched from
one sheet of water, or one morass, to another, and may be
roughly described as running parallel to the Newry Canal
and the Great Northern Railway in that place. The line
of the fosse and rampart can still be traced at various points
for the whole distance. " At one point the fosse is still eight
feet deep, the width from top to top of the ramparts is forty
feet, and the height of the rampart, above the level of the
field, is four feet, and the width from out to out of the ram-
parts is fifty-four feet." It was supported by numerous forts
or raths on the east side. At the southern end the rampart
trended to the east. Here, at Fathom, there was a strong
rath or fort, which, with the earthwork, commanded the passes
from the South, the pass at Forkhill, and the famous Moyry
Pass. These are the passes which in olden times were defended
by Cuchulainn. The northern end was defended by an equally
strons: fort at Lisnagoole.^
The territory of the Collas is said to have once extended
in the northern part of Ulster, from the Bann to Donegal, but
the portion eifectively occupied was comprised in Armagh,
Monaghan, and Louth, and was afterwards known as Oriel
(OipsiAllA).
This wall appears to have been a very effective defensive
work. Muiredach did not attempt to force the southern passes.
He fell in battle, fighting against the Ulidians, at Port Righe,
which was, probably, the ancient name of Benburb, on the
Biackwater. He was killed, says Tighernach, by Caelbhadh,
King of Ulad, chief of the Clannii Rury. Some say Caelbhadh
marched to Tara after his victory, and was saluted as King.
Tighernach, however, does not acknowledge him, or others who
are supposed to hava enjoyed short reigns, to have been High
King at all. But his having been partially acknowledged
as such has its meaning in our history, it tells of a vigorous
eftbrt made by the Irians to recover the territory from which
1 A detailed account of the " Great Wail of Ulidia," or " Dane's Cast," with fi
Map, is given in the Ulster Journal of Archseoiogy, vol. III., pp. 20 and 66.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 109
by Muiredach's aid they had recently been expelled by the
three Collas. The year after his victory at Port Righe,
Caelbhadh was slain by Eocaid Muighmheadhon (Mweevaon),
the son of Muiredach. Eocaid was King of Connacht at that
time, and then reigned at Tara for eight years. He married
Mong Finn (of the fair hair), daughter of Fidach, as his " one
wife." She was sixth in descent from Oilioll Olum, King of
Munster, and bore him four sons, who introduce us as it were
into modern history. They obtained the sovereignty of Con-
nacht, and from them the Kings and chiefs of that province
descended. Brian, the eldest, who is said to have left twenty-
four sons, was the ancestor of Hy Briuin, of Connacht, who are
not to be confounded with the O'Briens of Thomond, who
were Eberians of the family of Brian Boru, the son of Kennedy.
The Hy Briuin included the O'Connors of Connacht ; the
O'Rourkes of Breffney ; the O'Reillys of Cavan ; The MacDer-
mots, MacDonoughs, and O'Flaherties.
The second son was Fiachra, who occupied one territory in
the north of Connacht by the River Moy, now known as Tir-
reragh (Uif ■piActi}u\), and another territory in the south of
Connacht, comprised within the present diocese of Kilmac-
duagh. It was known as Hy Fiachrach Aidhne. The
Northern branch included the powerful Clan of the O'Dowdas.
The Southern branch included the Ui Clerigh and the Ui Edhin
(O'Heine) descended from Glereach-, Chieftain of the Ui Fiach-
rach of Aidhne, who was seventh in descent from Guairi Aidhne,
King of Connacht ; the Kilkellies ; and it included also the
O'Shaughnessys. The third son was Fergus, about whom we
do not find anything to mention. The fourth son was Oilioll
from whom Tirerill in Sligo is named. In this way the occu-
pation of Connacht by the line of Eremon, supplemented as it
was somewhat later on, as we have mentioned, by the intro-
duction of the descendants of Colla da Crioch into Hy Many,
was completely effected. The most famous of the sons of Eocaid
was not born in lawful wedlock. Niall of the Nine Hostao-es
Eocaid's fifth son, was born to him from Carinna, a
2 Clereach had two sons, Maolfabhail, chieftain of Aidhne, c. 887, the elder
from whom are the Ui Cleinj, and Edhin, the second son, from whom the Ui
Edhin descend. Edhin' s daughter, Mor, was the first wife of Brian Boru, to whom
she bore Murchadd, Concobar, and Fian, who were slain at Clontarf — O'Donovan
" Hy Fiachrach," 392, 398.
110 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Saxon, during the lifetime of Mong Finn, his "one wife."
She was probably a captive, the aditionelle, of the Ard Righ, as
we have already stated, and may have been of noble birth,
like the ancilla of Xanthias the Phocean. Polygamy was not
known to the Gael. We are unable to accept the views of Dr.
Stokes,^ who says : " But polygamy existed, and hence, Patrick,
like St. Paul, requires for the bishopric of Leinster a husband
of one wife (fir oen setche)." This, of course, refers not to two
wives at the same time, but to a man taking a second wife
after the death of his first wife. Such a man was ineligible
for episcopal orders. The injunction that the "twain" shall
be one flesh was rigorously applied in the case of orders, and
a man contracting a second marriage was regarded as carry-
ing part of the flesh of his first wife into the second nuptials,
and was classed as a " bigamist." It was for this reason that in
our statute a man " that hath married two wives or one widow "
was excluded from the benefit of the clergy, as this privilege
was originally confined to persons who being in the minor
might proceed to the higher orders of deacon, priest and
bishop.
It would, however, be a mistake to suppose that such a
connection as Carinna's was regarded as mere concubinage, ex-
cept by the lawful wife.* There was no distinction made
between the children whom we should classify as illegitimate
and the legitimate children as regards inheritance and suc-
cession, and Niall became in fact Ard High at Tara, and the
ancestor of nearly all the High Kings of Erin down to the
time of Brian Boru. Some thought that Carinna should be
called a Briton rather than a Saxon. O'FIaherty refers to
this, and says : —
Those who considered that the Saxons had not then come to Britain
think Carinna should be called a Briton instead of a Saxon in the
old muniments, relying on the hypothesis that she was sprung from
Britain, which the Saxons afterwards settled in. But there is ample
testimony that the Saxons about this very time, in conjunction with
the Picts and the Scots, made many raids into Britain long before they
had established fixed settlements there.
* Trip. Life, clxviii.
« Stephen, Criminal Law, I. 461— Sir FitzJames Stephen calls it a strange rule.
He was evidently not aware that bigamists as above defined, were ineligible for holy
orders.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. Ill
He refers to Ammianus Marcellinus, and quotes lines from
Claudian contained in the following passage, wliicli refers to
Theodosius the elder, the grandfather of the Emperor Honorius.
In 3G7 A.D. Theodosius the elder had repelled an invasion or
inroad of the Picts and Scots, who had penetrated as far as
the city, "which was anciently called London, but is now
known as Augusta." The passage is contained in the pane-
gyric on the 4th Consulship of Honorius, written in A.D.
898:—
Ille (i.e., Theodosius) Caledoniis posuit qui castra pruinia
Qui medios Libyse sub casside pertulit sestus
Terribilis Mauro, debellatorque Britanni
Litoris, ac pariter Borese vastator et Austi*!.
Quid rigor aeternus coeli, quid sidera prosunt
Ignotumque f return ? Maduerunt Saxone fuso
Orcades : incaluit Pictorum sanguine Thule
Scotorum cumulos flevit glaeialis lerna.*^
— De Quart Consul Honor 26-33.
As there is a conflict of modern opinion about Carinna, and
as the details we are about to give are useful in other ways,
we shall examine this point more fully. We have not found
it stated in any text before Keating that Carinna Cas-dubh
was a daughter of the King of Britain. O'Curry says she was
a Scottish Princess (M. & C. ii., 147), and Atkinson, in the
preface to the Book of Leinster, refers to her as a " Captive
Scottish Princess." The evidence before Keating, on the other
5 "He (i.e., Theodosius) pitched his camp amid Caledonian hoar frosts, and,
wearing the helmet, endured the heats of Central Africa. A terror to the Mauri,
he crushed the foe on the British shore, and spread devastation north and south
alike. What unchanging extremes of climate, what season of the year was of use ?
What profited seas unknown ? The Saxons were routed, and the Orkneys were
dripping [with gore]. Thule [probably here the Shetlauds] was warm with the
blood of the Picts. Icy Erin wept for the heaps (of slain)."
Glaeialis lerne, icy Erne should probably be understood, as the context
suggests, as the Hebrides, of which Ptolemy specifies two, which he attaches to
Erin in his 2nd chapter. Claudian, a native of Egypt, probably of Alexandria, who
had received the education of a Greek, as Gibbon tells us, no doubt took his
geography from Ptolemy, and balanced the heat of Central Africa with the glacial
rigours of the north.
This view is, we think, sustained by the following lines in the same passage : —
" Scotumque vago mucrone sequutus
Fregit hyperboreas remis audacibus undas."
" And pursuing the Scot with the Sword everywhere (vago) ivith daring oars he
broke through the Hyperborean waves." " Vago " must mean, we fancy, chasing
them through the islands.
De Tert Consul Honorii 55. Ogygia, p. 377.
112 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
hand, is very persuasive. Tighernach not only declares his
own view that she was of Saxon origin, but vouches in proof
an old duau : —
Nial Mor, the son of the Saxon,
Cairne her name as I have collected,
Five sons of Eocaid Muigmeadhoin,
Not trifling is what I have certified.*
In the Book of Ballymote (365a) and in the Yellow Book
of Lecan (188a) and in Kawlinson (502b) it is expressly stated
that Carinna was a Saxon.^ The last mentioned text states —
" Carinna Cas-dubh, daughter of Sachal Bolb of the Saxons,
was the mother of Niall." Later references to texts contain-
ing a similar statement will be found in S. H. O'Grady's " Silva
Gaedelica," in the tale " Echtra MacEchac Muigmedoin/'
and in ii. 493.
It is permissible to suggest that there may be some con-
founding of Carinna with Ciarnait, the daughter of the Pictish
chieftain, who was brought against her will by three Ulster
men into captivity. She was the loveliest of women, and
Cormac Mac Art sent to demand her, and she was taken to
his house. She was with him in amorous fellowship, and the
measure of his love for her was great. Then Ethne Ollamda,
the daughter of Cathaoir Mor, his " one wife," heard of her
being with him. She said they could not be with him to-
gether. Cormac was obliged to give Ciarnait into the power
of Ethne, who put a slave's task upon her, putting her to
grind corn, to wit, to grind nine or ten bushels of corn with
a quern every day. Cormac sent for a millwright across the
sea, and had a mill made to save Ciarnait.^ So in the " Echtra ''
it is stated that Carinna was an object of spite to the queen
(Mongfinn) and treated with great harshness by her, and this
was the harshness — that she should pull up from the well
half the water for Tara, and afterwards, when she became
enceinte, the whole of it. Her position was that of a bond-
maid. These stories, if true, go a long way to prove, in the
6 Rev. Celt., xvii, 32. The next entry in Tighernach is "Patricius captivus in
Hibeniiam ductus est."
'' Otia Mersiana ii., 84.
* Egerton 1782, edited and translated by Kuno Meyer, Otia Mersiana ii., 75.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 118
absence of direct evidence to the contrary, that there was no
recognized legal polygamy in pre-Christian Erin.'-^
After a reign of eight years, Eocaid died a natural death
at Tara. He was succeeded by Mong Finn's brother, Crimthann,
the son of Fidach, of the line of Eber, sixth in descent from
Olioll Olum. No information has reached us as to how or
why he came to be High King. The only suggestion we can
offer is that the sons of Eocaid were too young, and that he
was chosen as a regent under the title of King. He was not
King or Tanist of both or either of the Munsters, nor did he
come in by force of arms. Certain it is that no one of the line
of Eber became High King from his reign till the year 1002
(Brian Boru) ; and no one of the line of Eber had been High
King for 32 reigns before, since the time of Duach Dalta Degaid
(162 B.C.). It is also highly probable that Crimthann shared
in the expeditions which took place before his accession in
A.D. 366. These expeditions, as well as those of Niall and
Dathi, form so important and interesting part of our story, that
we deem it necessary to deal with the subject at some
length.
In the first half of the fourth century, after the abdication
of Diocletian, the Roman Empire was rent by civil dissensions.
Candidates for the imperial purple sprang up in every quarter,
and in the course of these contests Britain was denuded of
imperial troops. This was the opportunity of the Picts, the
Scots, the Attacotti, and the Saxons. Ammianus Marcellinus,
"an old soldier and a Greek," as he tells us, "who never
deceived by silence or misrepresentation," wrote his history
probably between the years 380 and 390. He was, therefore,
the contemporary of Crimthann. He writes :
A.D. 360. — The affairs of Britain became troubled in consequence
of the incursions of the Picts and Scots, who, breaking the peace ^" to
which they had agreed, were plundering the districts on their borders,
and keeping in constant alarm the provinces (i.e., of Britain), exhausted
^ It is a curious circumstance that Cariuna, the mother of Niall, from whom
descended a long line of Kings of Erin should be a Saxon, whilst Arietta, the
mother of William the Conqueror, from whom descended a long line of English
Kings, was, in all probability, an Ethnic Celt of Brittany or iSTormandy.
1" " Rupta quiete condicta." This implies previous hostilities. — Amm. Marcel.
XX. cap. i.
114 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
by former disasters. Caesar (i.e., Julian the Apostate), who was winter-
ing at Paris, having his mind divided by various cares, feared to go bo
the aid of his subjects across the Channel (as we have related Coustans
to have done) least he should leave the Gauls without a governor," while
the Allmanni were still full of fierce warlike inclinations.
A.D. 364. — The Picts, Scots, Saxons, and Attaootti harassed the
Britains with incessant invasions.
A.D. 368. — Valentinian (the Emperor) having left Amiens, and being
on his way to Treves, then the capital of the Western Prefecture, re-
ceived the disastrous intelligence that Britain was reduced by the
ravages of the united barbarians to the lowest extremity of distress,
that Nectarides, the Count of the sea coast, had been slain in battle, and
that the Duke Fullofandes had been taken prisoner by the enemy in
an ambuscade. Jovinus applied for the aid of a powerful army. Last
of all, on account of the many formidable reports, Theodosius (the Elder)
was appointed to proceed to Britain, and ordered to make great haste.
At that time the Picts, the Attacotti, a very warlike people, and the
Scots were all roving over different parts of the country, and commit
ting great ravages.
We shall return to this subject when we have carried our
narrative down to the coming of St. Patrick.
It is said that Crimthann was poisoned by his sister Mong
Finn. The story is told in the Leabhar Breac. Crimthann
went to Scotland. In his absence his nephews and Niall
rose in rebellion and seized the sovereignty. He returned
with a large force of Scots, and pitched his camp near the
river Moy, in Tirawley. Mong Finn pretended to be a peace-
maker, and invited Crimthann to a feast to meet her sons at
a place near the Moy.
When they had made an end of the entertainment, Mong Finn put
into her brother's hand a poisoned cup. " I will not drink," he said,
" until thou first shall have drunk." She drank, and Crimthann after
her. Subsequently she died on Samhain's very eve (the eve of the
banquet) Now came Crimthann from the northward,
progressing towards his o^vn natural country (that of the men of Muns-
ter)* until he gained Sliabh Suide in Righ, or the Mountain of the King's
Sitting, and there he died. Fidach, his father, his mother, and his nurse,
came to the spot where he perished. There they gave way to piteous
grief, and all three died on the very spot.
If the case was no stronger than this against her, Mong
Finn is entitled to our verdict of acquittal, and we shall have
the less hesitation in giving it, as the use of poison is unknown
11 Julian was proclaimed Emperor at Paris in the year 360 A.i>. He died or
the 26th June, 363.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 115
in Irisli history until the coming of the Angevin. It is more
reasonable, we think, to suppose that the High Kingship of
Crimthann did not displace the hegemony of the Eremonians,
and that he was originally chosen by them owing to his per-
sonal fitness, and through the influence of Mong Finn, to hold
the Kingship until one of the sons of Eocaid Muigmedoin
should be fit to take it. The rebellion, if it can be called such,
occurred thirteen years after the death of Eocaid, when Niall
was of age and fit to rule, and was headed by him, and he
became High King with the assent of his half-brothers, whom
he befriended.^^
The tradition that has reached us respecting the death of
Niall, is that he was slain by Eocaid, the son of Enna
Censelach, King of Leinster, on the banks of the Loire, near
the Muir n'Icht. The accounts given in the Yellow Book of
Lecan, the Book of Ballymote, and in the Eawlinson M.S., are
substantially the same. The latter is edited and translated by
Kuno Meyer. Niall was, doubtless, regarded as the High King,
not only of the Gael in Erin, but also of the " sea divided "
Gael wherever situate, and in claiming for him the lordship of
the western world (Ri-iarthar domhain) they had, no doubt, in
view the Gaelic settlements in Wales, in Cornwall, and in
Armorica. The Gaelic conception of monarchy was tribal, not
territorial. On his visit to Armagh, Brian Boru was described
in the entry then made in the book of Armagh as " Imperator
Scotorum " ; and it was not unnatural that the expedition into
foreign parts from which captives and booty were brought back
in large quantities should be magnified into conquests. One of
these captives, as we shall see in our next chapter, may have
been the Apostle of Erin, in after time to be associated with saints
of Gaelic birth, St. Columba and St. Bridget, as the three
patron saints of Ireland. Eocaid, the son of Censelach, had
been driven into exile by Niall. The tale in Rawlinson is
headed " The Slaying of Niall of the Nine Hostages, son of
Echu Mugmedon, by the hand of Echu, son of Enna Censelach,
who sent an arrow at him out of a Saxon camp among the
bards of the Pict folk at Cam Fiell."
12 Book of Ballvmote 263, c. 21, Silva Gaedelica, Vol, L 330, Vol. II.
373.
116 . EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
After stating the cause of the quarrel between Niail and
Echu, the tale proceeds :—
Niall, however, went to obtain kingship as far as Letha {i.e., Brit-
tany or Latium) and Italy, and he was called " of the Nine Hostages "
because he had five hostages of Ex'in, and one hostage each from Scot-
land and from the Saxons, the Briton's and the Franks. Now when
they came to the Alps there was a great river before them, to wit the
Loire of the Alps {i.e., the Massif Central). Echu was then with Ere,
the son of the King of Alba, an ally of Niall's, and Ere said he would
go to the assembly where Niall was. " I shall go with you," said Echu.
When they had arrived Ere said, '* That is he yonder." There was a glen
between them. Without the knowledge of Ere, Echu shot an arrow
from the bow and Niall fell dead from that single shot. Thereupon
the Franks attacked the Gael, and the men of Alba stood by the latter
for the sake of their kinship (ar connalbus). So they came to Erin
carrying the body of their king with them, and seven battles were broken
before the face of the dead king. It was Torna, the poet of the Ciar-
raighe Luachra, who had fostered Niall. Now, when he heard the
report that his foster-father had been slain, 'tis then Niall's foster-
brother, Tuirm,^^ said : —
" When " we used to go to the gathering with the son of Echu
Mugmedon, 3 ellow as the bright primrose was the hair on the head of
Cairenn's son.
Torna.
** His white teeth, his red lips that never reprimanded in anger."
TUIRM.
** Saxons will seek out here in the east noble men of Erin and Alba
after the death of Niall, Echu's noble son. It is a bitter cause of
reproach."
Torna.
" Saxons with flooding war cries, with bands of Lombards f i-om
Letha. From the hour the king fell the Gael and the Picfcs were in
evil plight."^*
Torna says nothing of assassination. The Cairenn above
mentioned as the mother of Niall is stated in Rawlinson to be
^ The accounts vary very much. Toma's dirge, which is ascribed by Kuno
Meyer to 800 A.D., says nothing about assassination. Ere, above mentioned, died
in A.D. 474, nearly seventy years after the death of Niall. If there was assassination
we should expect to find that the assassin was cut down on the spot. Cinaed
O'Hartigan ( + 975) says Echu drove his speai- through him before the hosts.
"Fischrift Whitley Stokes, — Toltemklage um Konig Niall (Kuno Meyer),
p. 3 (1890).
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. Il7
='the daughter of Scael Dubh of the Saxons," as already
stated.
Niall was succeeded by Dathi, the son of his half brother,
Fiacra. According to the Book of Lecan, Dathi was the fifth
and youngest son, and was at the time king of Connacht, and
the last Pagan king of that province. After fighting many
battles in Erin and Alba " Dathi afterwards went with the
men of Erin to Leatha (i.e., Letavia or Brittany) until he
reached the Alps, to revenge the death of Niall."
There was a tower on the Alps build by Formenius (unknown
to history), king of Thrace, in which he was making his soul
at the end of his days. It was a round tower made of sods and
stones, sixty feet high. The men of Erin demolished the
tower, and at the prayer of the recluse a flash of lightning came
from Heaven and killed the Pagan monarch. His body was
brought to Cruachan, in Roscommon, six miles from Carrick-
on-Shannon, and buried in the Relig na Riogh (cemetery of
the kings), where to this day a red pillar-stone remains as a
monument over his grave. His reign lasted twenty-three
years, and he was succeeded in A.D. 428 by Laeghaire, the son
of Niall, in the fourth year of whose reign St. Patrick came to
Erin to preach the Gospel.
We shall now return to the subject of the Gaelic settlements
in South-west Britain, reserving for a future page their settle-
ments in North Britain, and directing our attention for the
present particularly to Arthur and Glastonbury of the Gael
We have already given the duan in which the bard with
poetic exaggeration describes the conquests of Crimthann.
" Moreover," says Ammianus, " the Franks and the Saxons were com-
mitting outrages on the districts which meared with themselves where-
ever they could break in by sea or land, plundering cruelly, and burning
and killing their captives, Theodosius marched from Augusta, which
was formerly called Lundinium,^' attacked the bands of plunderers and
routed them, whilst driving prisoners in chains (vincti) and cattle before
them, and he entirely restored the cities and the fortresses, which,
through the manifold, disasters of the time, had been injured and des-
troyed, having been originally founded to secure the tranquillity of the
country. He established stations and out-posts or. the frontiers, and he
^8 Ab Augusta profectus quam veteres appellavere Lundium — Ammianus,
Kviii. p. '6.
118 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
SO completely recovered the province which had yielded subjection to the
enemy, that it was again brought under its legitimate rule, and by de-
sire of the Emperor called Valentia." ^
The province here referred to must be understood to mean
the province up to Hadrian's wall. The wall between the Forth
and the Clyde, made by Antoninus Pius, was abandoned or
lost before the end of the 2nd century. The poetic and courtly
exaggerations of Claudian, excusable perhaps in a panegyric,
must not be taken too seriously. They are equalled, in fact
surpassed, by what we find in the Gaelic Bards. " It was
this Crimthann," says Keating, " gained victories, and ex-
tended his sway over Alba, Britain and Gaul, as the Shanachie
tells us in the foUowinsr rann : —
"O
Crimthann, son of Fidach, ruled,
The Alban and the Irish lands,
Be3'ond the clear blue seas he quelled,
The British and the Gallic might."
To the like purport and effect is the entry in Cor mac's
Glossary : —
" Mug Eime — that is the name of the first lap-dog that was in Erin.
Cairbre Muse, the son of Conaire, brought it from the east from Britain ;
for when great was the power of the Gael in Britain, they divided Alba
between them into districts, and each knew the residence of his friend,
and not less did the Gael dwell on the east side of the sea than in Scotia
(i.e. Erin), and their habitations and royal forts were built there. There is
(a fort) called Dun Tradui, i.e., Triple fossed fort of Crimthann, the
great son of Fidach, King of Erin and Alba, to the Ichtian Sea, and
there is Glastonbury of the Gael, i.e. , a church on the border of the
Ichtian Sea, and it is on that part is Dinn map Laethain, in the lands
of the Cornish Britons, i.e., the Fort of MacLentham, for mac is the
same as map in the British. Thus every tribe divided on that side, for
its property on the east was equal to that on the west, and they con-
tinued in this province till long after the coming of Patrick."
1" Picti in duas genfees divisi Dicalydonas et Verturiones, itidemque Attacotti
bellicosa hominum natio et Scotti per diversa vagantes multa populabantur, Galli-
canos [vero] tractus Franci & Saxones idem confines quoquisque erumpere potuit
terra vel niari prsediis ascerbis incendiisque et captivoram funeribus hominum
violabant. — Amm. Marcel., xxvii., cap. 8, xziviii., cap. 3 and 8.
The Attacotti here mentioned were, as already referred to (C. I.) no doubt
tribesmen of those seen by St. Jerome, in Treves, during the residence of Valen-
tinian. The Notilia Imperii mentions four bodies of Attacotti stationed in Graul.
St. Jerome's visit and residence in Treves are commonly assigned to the time of
Valentinian, and the Attacotti may have enlisted under the Imperial Eagles after
the victories of Theodosius the elder.
GLASTONrURT oF THE GAEL. Il9
Hence Cairbre Muse was visiting in the East his family and
friends." " Alba " here applies to Southern, though more fre-
quently applied to Northern Britain. Both are called, as we
have seen, the land of the " Albiones " by Avienus.^^ The
Ichtian sea, as understood at the time we speak of, was the
sea between France and England, and more particularly the
parts near the Loire and the south coast of England and Erin,
which, i.e., Erin, was supposed to lie to the S.S. West of Britain,
towards Spain and France, and the position of Spain was shifted
correspondingly. There was an island, Ictis, off the coast of
Britain, from which tin was brou^^jht in ingots on waggons
when the tide was out, as Diodorus Siculus tells us (V. 229 2).
ei^ riva vijaoy irpoKEtjiivriv rfjc wpeTrariKFje vvofxaXofitprfv de 'iktiv —
Diodor, V. 22, 2.
This island is reasonably supposed to be Mount St. Michael,
off Cornwall.^^ There was another Ictis to which vessels bound
inward brought cargoes of tin from Britain, in wicker boats
covered with hides, in a voyage of six days. This Ictis, we
are of opinion, was situated in the estuary of the Loire, and the
tin was then carried on pack-horses, a journey of thirty days,
not to the confluence of the Saone and Loire, as Mr. Elton
supposed, but to the outfall of the Rhone, i.e. Marseilles at the
Bouches de Rhone.^'^
[Trpdc T)]i' EK^o^riv tov polavov vorafiov'^
This is accounted for by what Strabo tells us — that the
Rhone was not navigable up-stream owing to the force and
velocity of the current, so that the traffic went by land and not
by the river. Thus the pack-horses or mules were not unloaded
at the Rhone and the tin put on board a boat, but the animals
went on to Marseilles to have a load going back. The island
in the estuary of the Loire can no longer be identified, but the
coast here has undergone remarkable changes, and, assuming
we are right in our conjecture that it once existed, there is no
" Sanas Cormac and translation, Stokes, sub voce,
" Holder, Sprachschatz, sub voce, Albion.
^' St. Michael's Mount is a granite hill, 230 feet high, and ahout one mile in
Circait at its base, 2 miles distant from Penzance by water. It is an island for
eight hours out of the twenty four, and at spring tides for much longer ; and in
rough weather the rough causeway which now connects it v-i'tb the shore is under
water for days together.
20 Origins of English History, 35.
120 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
difficulty in believing that it is now well inland as part of the
adjoining continent. The voyage between the islands was
through the Ichtian sea called in Gaelic the Muir n'Icht. —
Roughly speaking, the channel of the sea, at the south of
England and the south of Ireland were, from the time of Caesar
and Tacitus and Pliny, conceived of as one continuous channel
bearing S.S.W. to Spain.^^
There was another island, from which amber was brought,
in the German Ocean — Oser icta, which seems to suggest that
icta or ictis or ruictis was a word applicable to islands of a par-
ticular character, possibly like St. Michael's Mount. The mean-
ing of the word ictis, however, has not hitherto been traced or
ascertained. We suggest the Gaelic iuchd or iuc as a probable
root. Carmichael tells us it means a nook, angle, or recess.
" There is a Rock in Benderloch," he writes, "called Greag
neucht, evidently a corruption of ' Creag an iucht — ' the
Rock of Knaugh or recess.' " So inis an iuchd would mean
the island of the recess, and Muir n'Icht the sea of the recess
or channel, as opposed to what is called the great plain of the
Sea (trix^s fleiti).22
The statements contained in Cormac's glossary are, to a
large extent, confirmed bv what is known of the Gaelic occu-
pation of Wales. This subject has been exhaustively examined
in a treatise by Bishop Basil Jones. He claims, and we think
on sufficient grounds, that the Gael were in occupation of
Anglesey, Carnarvon, Monmouth and Cardiganshire, with a
portion at least of Denbigh, Montgomery and Radnor, and
with minor settlements in South Wales, until the accession of
Caswallawn Low Her (443, 517). In various parts of Wales
the word Gwyddel (Gael) enters into the composition of local
names. He enumerates iiS instances ; and there are numerous
references to the Gael in the traditions of the Cymri who
claimed to be the earliest inhabitant of Wales. They complain
^ Timaeus historicus a Britannia introrsum sex dierum navigatio abesse dicit,
insulam Mictim (i.e., Iclim) in qua candidum plumbum proveniat ; ad earn Britaunos
ritilibus navigiis cmio circumsutis navigare. — Pliny N. H., 4, 104. This is our view
of this vexata questio, the position of Ictis, and the Ichtian Sea, which is of impor-
tance with reference to the death of Niall and otherwise.
Desjardins " Geographie Historique de Gaule Eomaine."
82 Pliny " Nat. Hist." xxxviii. c. 2. Carmina Gaedelica, II. 294.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 121
of invasions of their territory time and again by the Gael from
Erin.23
" What is trite is that a certain Irish clan did invade and occupy
Brecknoc and Carmarthen, as well as Pembrokeshire and that about 530
they were driven out of the two first counties, and that they then in-
vaded and occupied North East Cornwall from Padslow Harbour and
the North of Devon as far as Exmoor. This was not by any means a
first descent. The whole coast had been a prey to invasions from
Ireland for two centuries. So early as 461 the British settlers at the
mouth of the Loire were numerous enough to have a Bishop of their
own who attended the Council of Tours, and in 468 they sent 12,000
men under their King Riothemus to the assistance of the Romans
against th« Visigoths." ^
*t5"
" Glastonbury of the Gael, on the border of the Ichtian sea."
What foundatian is there for this statement ? We have
given much attention to this question, and shall now place
before our readers as briefly as may be the fruits of our labour.
The site of the famous Abbey is situated in Mid Somerset
about six miles south of Wells. In early times the moorlands
in Mid Somerset, and particularly those surrounding Glaston-
bury, were covered by large tracts of shallow water and exten-
sive areas of marsh. The more elevated parts appeared like
islands, of which the site of the Abbey was the principal. A
river flowed westwards through this area round the island
"surrounded on both sides by what was in early times an im-
passable morass or rather lagoon. Overflowed by the sea at
every high tide, it was connected on the east side by an
isthmus, of but slight elevation above the surrounding moor,
with the higher ground, and presented the appearance of a
peninsula." -^ One mile to the north a cranoge or village
habitation was discovered in 1892, covering three acres, the
site of which, though 15 miles from the sea, is only 18 feet
above the sea level. ^
At the point where the isthmus reaches the elevated land,
the remains of earthworks are found indicating that a great
22 Vestiges of the Gael in Gwynnedd (North Wales), 1851,— p. 38, 30.
^ Gould, S. Baring, 1S99, aided amongst others, by Mr. J. D. Enys whose
knowledge of things Cornish is encyclopsedic. See also " Devon, 1899 " by the
same author. — Book of the West, Cornwall, p. 4, 7.
^ Proc. Somerset Archl. Soc. Vol. VIII. (1869), p. 140, an interesting paper,
" British Cattle Stations," by the Rev F. Wane, whose local knowledge places
these facts beyond dispute.
122 EAELY IRISH HISTORY.
dun or vallum was made there to defend the pass to what, it
is suggested, was a " cattle station," or as the Gael would call
it a " Clithar Bo " on the island.
Rhys refers to Glastonbury as an unidentified fort of the
Cornish Britons, or as he calls them Brythons. " The name,"
he says, " so far as we know, is completely lost in the dialects
of the Brythons, and it is probable that they were not the
races that gave it to the island ; it is more likely that they
learned it from the Gael whom they found in possession. It
need hardly be added that its meaning is utterly unknown, in
spite of guesses both new and old ; probably the word is not
Celtic." 2^ We venture to think that there is not much diffi-
culty in finding a Gaelic origin for the name.
The Latin form of the name is Glastonia — with a variant
Glasconia. The Anglo Saxon, coming afterwards, is Glastingia,
or, more frequently, Glastingabyrg. The Abbey was usually
called in later English Glaston Abbey. We suggest that
Glastonia is the Gaelic glas donn, that is brown river, or from
inis glaia duinn — island of the brown river, which, no doubt,
represented correctly enough the water of the sluggish or
stagnant Brue. The Anglo Saxon Glastingbyrg or Glas-
tingabyrg refers to the town, and is easily accounted for by
the introduction into glais dAiinn of the familiar " iyig," as
Huntandun became Huntingdon, Aehhandan became Abing-
don, etc. The Cymric name, " Ynysvitrin," is clearly inis
vitria (the " glass " island) by a false etymology,^'
On this island of the brown river at an early period was
built a small walled church, sixty feet long and twenty-six
feet broad, with a window in the east front and three windows
at each side, and roofed with thatch. When we come to the
time of Ina it was known as the old church — the Ecclesia
Vetusta — in fact, the oldest in Britain. It was held in great
*6Early Britain, 202.
2' Glaise, or glais, or glas, signifyin;! a small stream or rivnlst, is very often
nsed to give names to streams and thence to townlands, e.g., Finnglas, fair stream ;
Glasawhee (5lAr t)uix)e), yellow stream, and Dub glas, black stream. — Anglice,
Douglas.— Joyce, " Names of Places," 2nd Ed., 440. Glas, water.— "The word is
now rare in its simple form, but is common in compounds, as Douglas, and Glasdrum,
from glas and druim, a ridge, etc.— Carmichael, Carm. Gael, ii., 2S7. In the Char-
ters of Ine the name is variously given. Glastingaburga (5G), Glastingaea (58),
Glasteie and Glastingae (80), Glastingbiu-i (89). Kemble, " Codex Diplom," Vol.
II. The pure Latin is always Glastonia and Glastoniensis. Warner's well-kno^yn
work is entitled t;ie " History of the Abbey of Glaston and of the town of
Glastonbui-y (1826)."
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 123
veneration, and legends were put in circulation, in Benedictine
times, about its origin. It was said that it was founded by
Joseph of Arimathea, who had buried the Lord. There is
no doubt that there was an Lcdesia in existence in the time
of Pauliuus, Archbishop of York (625-644), and that he had it
"cased with boards and covered with lead from top to
bottom."
We have now nearly reached a period when we can refer to
the evidence of charters, the authenticity of which is generally
accepted. Some writings of an earlier date, including a letter
from St. Patrick, are now universally rejected as forgeries.
We refer only to the charters which are printed in
Kemble's " Codex Diplomaticus," the authenticity of which
is not now questioned by any competent critic, commencing
from the time of Ine or Ina, King of the West Saxons ( + .728),
who built a great church east of the venerated old church in
710 A.D., and generously endowed the monastery, by the advice
of Aldhelm, Bishop of Sherborne, in Dorset. Ina was of the
race of Cedric, the first King of the West Saxons, and it was
in the struggle against these invaders that Arthur was chosen
the champion of the Britons.
The year 516 A.D. is the date generally received as that
on which he was chosen " over many men nobler than himself,
as commander of the army of defence." He was chieftain
probably of the people called Domnonia, or Devoneans, who
were then the predomniant race in what are now Somerset,
Devon, and Cornwall. His famous authentic victory of Mons
Badonicus may probably be placed at Badbury, in Dorset, and
assigned to about the year 520. His opponent was Cedric,
who had landed at the mouth of the Itchen, in 496, and
defeated Natanleod near Netley in 508. The advance of the
Saxons was stopped for a time by the victory at Badbury.
It was not until Cawlin (593) that they reached the Axe,
nor until Ceanwealh (672), that they reached the Parret in
Somerset.-^
Domnonia, which is the Latinised form of the name of the
then inhabitants of Devonshire, represents the Gaelic Domnann
who were, as we have seen, a Firvolc race, remnants of which
28 These dates must be received with reserve. — See Stevenson's Eng. Hist
Kev. (l'J02, 625).
124 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
were found in Irras Domnann, in Mayo, and Inver Domnann,
now Malahide Bay.-^ The Domnonii were a terrible " tribe ;
scorners of death, and formidable to the foemen, like the
Clanna Morna in Erin."^^ Civil dissension having broken out
amongst them, " as if there was no foe at their gates/' says
Gildas, Arthur's nephew, Mordred, rose up against him, and a
fierce battle was fought at Camion, which was probably in
Cornwall, in which Arthur was slain, or, according to some
authors, only mortally wounded. He was taken to Glaston
Abbey, of which he had been a liberal benefactor, and his
body was interred there, where it was discovered with the
body of his wife in after years, as we shall relate. It was fit-
ting that Arthur, whom we claim as a Gael, should have his
place of resurrection, to use the usual Gaelic phrase, in Glaston-
bury of the Gael.^^ That the vetusta ecclesia there was the
Church of St. Patrick, is proved indisputably by two charters.
— " I, King Ina," one (704 A.D. ?) states, " bestow this freedom
on the monks who, in the Church of the Blessed Virgin a7id
Blessed Patrick, serve Almighty God under Abbot Hemgislus,
in the ancient town called Glastingaea, and place this worth
and privilege on the altar." Details of the freedom and
privilege are then set forth. This charter is subscribed by
Aldhelm.
In 681, Baldred, King of Mercia, with the consent of his
bishop, Heddo, granted to Hemgislus, abbot (of Glaston), as
29 The pronunciation of Dom-nann in Gaelic would be DhuT-o-uann, i.e.. the
aspirated " tri " might be pronounced like " v " and a short vowel introduced be-
tween the " m " and the " n " for euphony, according to the usual rule. Dom-
nann would thus be nearly equivalent to Dev-o-non, from which the transition to
Devon is easy. In this way Daiminnis (the Ox's Isle) became Devinish, and many
other instances might be cited.
i»jA.ldhelm (t. 709) wrote :—
Sicut pridem pepigerem
Quando profectus fueram
Usque diram Domnoniart
Per carentem Carnubiam
. Florulentis cespitibus
Et fecundis graminibus.
— Jaffe Monnm, Moguntiae, 38.
Cornwall was in the old diocese of Dumnonia, now merged in Exeter.
*i There are multitudinous views about everything connected with Arthur —
His very existence is doubted. We have stated what we believe to be probable,
and, in the words of Caxton, " But for to give faith to all that be herein, ye be at
your own liberty." — Preface to Sir T Malory.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 125
an addition for the honoured Church of the Blessed Virgin and
St. Patrick (ecclesiae beatse Mariae et Sancti Fatricii), the
lands of Somerset. ^'^
In both the charters the old church is recognized as being
dedicated to the Blessed Virgin, and under the patronage of
and belonging to St. Patrick, the only difference between them
being that in the iirst he is styled a Saint, in the second only
blessed. After this the rule of St. Benedict appears to have
been at least partially established, and the advisers of the
Saxon Kings were Benedictines. In the charter of 725, Ina
bestowed on the monastery the '' worth of privilege that the
brothers shall have the power of electing and appointing a
rector, according to the rule of St. Benedict." The condum
neum was established, and followed of course in due time by
the ouster of the Gael.^
In this great charter Ina grants various denominations of
lands, and confirms the donation made by his predecessors to the
old church consecrated to God and the Blessed Virgin. The name
of St. Patrick is wholly omitted. It states — " The old church
t^iostri Jesu Christi et perpetuae Virginis Marice, as it is the
first in Britain and fountain and source of all religion, should
receive a pre-eminent worth of privilege, &c., and should hold
its lands free from the exactions of Kings and the promul-
gations and perturbations of archbishops and bishops."^* The
lands granted and confirmed by Ina include a parcel called
"Boek Ereie," which is frequently mentioned afterwards, in
grants or otherwise, with the addition little Hibernia (i.e.,
parva Hibernia). Boek Ereie is, of course, tjeg Gpiu, little
Erin, and there was a famous islet of that name in Wexford
Harbour, over which St. Ibhar was abbot in the time of St.
Patrick. It is still known as Begery.
Joannes Glastoniensis (flor. 1400), who wrote the history
of Glastonbury, tells that there was, down to his time, an
^EgoIniKex. . . . banc libertatem monachis qui in ecclesia beatae dei
genetricis, Mai-iaj et beati Patricii omnipoteuti deo, sub abbati Hemgislo famulan-
tur in pristina ui'be qute dicitur Glastingaea, impendo et banc privilegii, dig-nitatem
super altare pono ut, &c.— Kemble, Codex Diplom., I., 58., and I., 25.
"3 Hanc privilegii dignitatem concessit ut babeant fratres, ejusdem loci potes-
tatem elegendi et constituendi sibi rectoreni juxta regulam Sancti Beuedicti.
" Cod. Dip." I., 86. All tbese cbarters escaped the notice of Abbott Gasquet in
bis " Last Abbott of Glastonbui-y."
""Codex Diplom.,"' L, 87.
126 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
ancient chapel in honour of St. Brigid on the island of beag
Erin, He also mentions the ornamentation on the tomb of
St. Patrick. The tradition of the displacement of the Gaelic
monks is thus referred to by Camden, and other authors say-
that St. Dunstan actually brought monks from Italy in their
stead.^
" In these early ages men of exemplary piety devoted themselves
here to God, especially the Irish, who were maintained at the king's
expense, and instructed youth in religion and the liberal sciences.
They had embraced solitude to apply themselves with more leisure to
the study of the Scri23tures, and by a severe course of life accustom
themselves to bear the cross. At length, Dunstan, a man of domineer-
ing (subactus 1) and crafty temperament, by underhand acts and
flatteries wormed himself into an intimacy with the Kings, and intro-
duced in their stead the monks of a newer order, namely, of St.
Benedict." 3«
We are not concerned here to discuss who the saint or
blessed Patrick referred to was, whether he was our apostle as
the tradition there had it, or another saint known as Sen
Patrick, as our texts state. Our object is to show that the
monastery was Gaelic. St. Patrick's " muinter " would, un-
doubtedly, have considered him their first abbot wherever
their habitation might be placed, and, at Glaston,
Benignus was regarded as the second abbot. This, however,
would not exclude the view that there was a Sen Patrick, who
was abbot in loco there, who was buried there, and whose tomb
was lavishly ornamented and greatly venerated in after time.
John of Glastonbury maintained that our apostle was buried
there, and that it was the " other " St. Patrick that was buried
^ Sed jam capella ejusdem insula constat in honore Sanctae Brigidse prae-
dictte in cujus parte australi foramen liabetur per quod qui transierit juxta vulgi
opinionem oninium peccatorum suorum veniam obtinebit. — P. 69.
Corpus suum (i.e., Patricii) in pyramide saxea fuit collocatum juxta altare
versus austrum quam pro veneratioue ejusdem Sancti postea auro et argento vesti-
vit nobiliter domesticorxim diligentia^ — Joannes Glaston, p. 67.
^* Primis his temporibus viri sanctissimi hie Deo invigilai-ant et prajcipue Hiber-
nici qui stipendiis regiis alebantur et adolesceutes pietate, artibusque ingenuis in-
struebant Solitariam euim vitam amplexi sunt ut majore, cnm tranquillitate sacris
litei'is vacarent et severo vitae geuere ad crucem perfereudam se exercereut. Sed
tandem Dunstanus, subacto* et versuto ingcnio homo quum, mails artibus et blan-
ditiis in prLncipum consuetudinem se peultus immerslsset, pro his recentioris iusti-
tuti Mouachos scilicet Benedictinos induxit.
* Subactus, as an adjective, we have not met elsev>'here. Du Gauge has Sabac-
tus (noun) = Dominium. Perhaps the word should be " Subacuto " — sly or subt-le.
Camden, Britannia, p. 158.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 127
in Downpatrick. Our texts state or imply exactly the
reverse.
The finding of the body of Arthur may now claim our
attention. The best account of this is to be found in Leland's
Assertio Arturii. He visited Glaston Abbey in the time of
the last abbot, Whiting (1525-1539), who was " perfect for him,"
and whom he styles the whitest of the white, and his proven
friend {homo sane candidissimus et amicus 'mens singularis)P
He singles out two authorities as of primary importance — an
anonymous monk of Glaston Abbey, whose name was unknown
to him, the other Cambrensis Giraldus. Both say that Henry II.,
who kept the Abbey in his own hands after the death of Henry
de Blois, Bishop of Winchester, having heard the tradition
that Arthur was buried between two pyramids near the old
church, ordered the remains to be exhumed, and placed in
the new church before the high altar. Those pyramids were
26 and 18 feet high respectively. The taller had five courses
or stories (tabulatus), on the topmost of which was a figure
like a bishop [imago pontificali schemate] ; in the second a
figure conducting a royal procession, and the words. Hex Sexi.
Blisiuerth. In the third course were the words, Wivicreste, Ban-
tomp,Weneivegn. The other pyramid had four courses. There
were words on those and the remaining courses of the taller
pyramids such as those we have mentioned. No mention was
made of Arthur or Guinevere in these inscriptions, but the tradi-
tion was that the pyramids were erected in his memory, or, as
we venture to suggest, one for the king and the other for the
queen, but that no mention was made of them in the inscrip-
tions, as it was desired to keep the place of his burial secret :
" He was buried deep down for fear of the Saxons," wrote the
monk. The words may have been cryptic, or put on the
pyramids with the object of misleading. On digging down
between the pyramids the searchers came on a, broad stone
^ Leland's Collectanea, t. 50.
Whiting refused to surrender Glaston Abhey and its possessions to Henry
VIII. In 1539. the " remembrance " of Cromwell directed " the Abbot of Glaston
to be tried at Glaston, and executed there with his complycys." We are not con-
cerned here with the judicial forms used to cover the " taking off of heads " at this
time. He was hanged, drawn, and quartered on Tor Hill, of the Abbey, on Friday,
November 14, 1539.' The Blessed Richard Whiting was beatified in 1896. The
value of the possessions of the Abbey is variously estimated, but, probably, amounted
to ^100,000 a year of our money.
128 EAULY IRISH HISTORY.
slab, on the under side of which was fastened, face downwards,
a leaden plate in the shape of a cross, with the words inscribed
on the face : — " Hie jacet sepultus inclytus rex Arthurus in
insula Avelonia." (Here lies buried the famous King Arthur
in the Avelonian island.) Nine feet below this the searchers
came upon a hollowed oak tree, in which were found the
bones, as we assume, of Arthur occupying two-thirds of the
space, and the bones of Guinevere occupying the remaining
third. Her hair "yellow and beautiful, and braided with
exquisite art " (flavam, formosam, et miro artificio consertam)
crumbled into dust when they touched it. The remains of
both were reverently removed and placed in a magnificent
tomb before the high altar. Giraldus did not witness the
exhumation, nor does Camden say he did. He was shown the
cross with the inscription by Henry, who was made abbot on
the death of Henry II., 1189, and became Bishop of Worcester
1191, whilst Leland was also shown the cross by Whiting, and
gazed on it with the loving curiosity of an antiquary. The
cross has been lost or mislaid, but Camden took a copy from a
"prototype," which has been engraved and published.^^
Giraldus was also shown the bones of Arthur, which were
of enormous size. The shin bone was placed on the ground
beside the leg of the tallest man then present, and was three
finger-breadths above his knee. The skull was very large,
and had the marks of ten wounds upon it, nine of which had
formed into a firm cicatrix. The tenth was a wide, gaping
gash, and was, seemingly, the cause of death. These
bones, coupled with the name Arthur, and the proofs we have
given of Gaelic immigrations into the South West of Britain
indicate that this man of gigantic stature, comparable to the
Gaelic giants we have already mentioned, of which there is
no example amongst the pure Cymri, are persuasive proof
that Arthur was a Gael ; and the colour of Guinevere's (Fin-
nabhair ?) hair is some evidence that she too was of Nordic
stock.^^ In 1276 Edward I. and Eleanor visited Glaston Abbey.
The King caused Arthur's tomb to be opened, when he " found
the bones of wonderful thickness and largeness." Next day
^ Quam ego curiossimus contemplatus sum oculis et solicitis contrectavi arti-
culis motus antiquitate rel et dignitate.
*® ^ Gaelic = Cymric go ; e.g., -pw, wine, and gioin, wine, 63 and 64.
GLASTONBURY OF THE GAEL. 129
the King folded up Arthur's bones and the Queen Guinevere's
bones in separate wrappers, with precious preservatives, and
fixed their seals thereon. The skulls of both, however, were
not placed in the tomb, but retained as relics " by reason of
the zeal of the people."
Two epitaphs had been already placed on the tomb — one
for Arthur :
Hie jacet Authurus flos regum gloria regni
Quern mores, probitas commendant laudi perenni
Here lies Arthur, flower of Kings, glory of tlie realm,
For whom a pure and upright life has won eternal fame.
And one for Guinevere :
Hie jacet Arturi conjux tumulata secunda,*
Quae meruit caelos virtutum prole fecunda.
Here lies entombed Arthur's wife, seeondly (I)
The fruitful mother of virtues that have won her heaven.
The story we have just placed before our readers is some-
times treated as a monkish forgery and fable. In a recent
work, for example, by distinguished authors, we find tho
following : —
" So real was this expectation {i.e., the return of Arthur, hale and
strong, to lead his people), that it is supposed to have counted with
the English King as one of the forces he had to quell in order to obtain
quiet from the Welsh. So the monks of Glastonbury proceeded to dis-
cover there the coffin of Arthur, his wife, and her son / This was to
convince the Welsh of the unreasonableness of their reckoning on the
return of Arthur, who had been dead for some 600 years. "*^
We consider this way of writing history to be deplorable.
The dead are entitled to fair play as well as the living ; and
t is elementary justice that if a grave charge is to be made it
should be made in clear and precise language, and not by way
of insinuation.
*" Secunda. — There is no suggestion in any text that Arthur was twice
married, and we conjecture the "-stridulous " poet, as Leland calls him, wrote both
epitaphs, and used "secunda" to make his rhyme, in the above sense, with the
second Hie jacet.
41 "The Welsh People " (1902) Ehys & Jones, p. 693. The son is imaginary.
K
V»"
130 EARLV IRISH HTSTORV
The authors here must be held to mean, and, we humbly
think, ought to have said that Henry II., and the monks and
divers persons, known or unknown, conspired to palm off on
the Cymri and the general public " bogus " remains of Arthur
as genuine for a political purpose.
We venture to think that they greatly underestimated the
intelligence of the Cymri, the sagacity of the monarch, and,
we will add, the honesty of the monks.
Henry was not likely to lend himself to an open daylight
fraud that was certain to be exposed and make him ridiculous,
and the Cymri never asserted that it was a fraud, which they
would certainly have done if there were any grounds for such
an allegation. The Cymri had better reasons for defending
their liberty than the expectation of Arthur's return, and the
monarch had surer means to enforce their obedience than the
production of his bones.
[ 131 ]
CHAPTER IX.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK.*
THos fAOtAip ocuf ]:05nAmA -00 CfifC.
A slave, laborious and serviceable to Christ. — Trip. Life.
DURING the reigns of Crimthann, Niall, and Dathi, the
Roman Empire was sinking. Torn by civil strife;
distracted by religious controversy, and assailed on every
frontier, it appeared to be approaching its last agonies. The
year before the accession of Niall (378 A.D.), the flower of the
Imperial army fell on the disastrous day of Adrianople
•'' Though the Romans," writes Ammianus, " have often had
experience of the fickleness of fortune, their annals contain
no record of so destructive a defeat since the battle of Cannae."
In 383 A.D., Maximus revolted, and crossed over into Gaul
with the greater part of the Roman troops then stationed in
Britain. In 400 A.D., Alaric entered Italy, and the troops at
the extremities were summoned to defend the heart of the
Empire. " From furthest Britain," says Claudian, came the
guarding legion that bridled the fierce Scot, and wiping off the
blood, examined closely the figures, pictured by puncture
on the dying Pict."^ The terrified Romans set vigorously to work
to rebuild the walls of the city. — How were the mighty fallen ?
Rome was now to experience the truth of the old, old saying,
so much admired by Polybius, " that fortune only lends her
favours to nations."
On the last day of the year 406 occurred the irruption of
the barbarians across the frozen Rhine into Gaul. " Innumer-
able and cruel nations," writes St. Jerome (.342-426), in a
1 The Patrician Dates we suggest are the following : — Biith, 392-393 ; Cap-
tivity, 407-408 : Apostohc Mission, 432 ; Death, 492-493.
a Venit et extremis legio pr£Etenta Britannis
Qure Scoto dat frena tnici ferroque notatas
Perlegit exsangues Picto morienti figuras.
— '-De iiei:o Getico," 416-18.
Exsangues = clearing away the blood (?)
132 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
letter to Ageruchium, exhorting her against a second marriage,
" have inundated Gaul. All that lies between the ocean and
the Rhine, and between the Alps and the Pyrenees, has been
devastated by the Quadi, the Vandals, the Sarmatians, the
Alani, the Herulians, the Burgundians, and, oh ! unhappy
republic, by the Pannonians. Mainz, which was formerly an
important town, has been taken and sacked, and thousands
have been slaughtered in the church. After a long siege,
Worms has been destroyed, and Rheims, a town of old so
strong ; Amiens, Arras, the Morini, who dwell at the extremity
of the earth; Tournai, Spires, Strasburg, have been carried off
into Germany (translates sunt in Germaniam). Answer me,
my daughter, is this a proper time to think of marrying ? " ^
" A cloud of Saxons, Burgundians, &c., followed in the wake
of the invading host, with a view to pillage and plunder.
They carried off so many Gauls into captivity that, according
to the expression of a contemporary, the Belgic cities were
transported into Germany."*
The Morini at the end of the earth was a reminiscence of
Virgil. In the 8th book of the " ^neid," he describes the
wonderful shield given by Venus to ^neas, on which, in one
scene, Augustus is pourtrayed receiving the gifts of the nations.
He is seated at the portals of the Temple of Apollo. In long
array before him, file envoys from the conquered peoples from
the Euphrates in the East to the Morini, furthest of men, and
the " two-horned Rhine," on the West. But now, " Who will
believe it ? " Jerome asks. " What fitting language can ever
be found to express it, that Rome has to fight at the heart of
the Empire, not for glory but for life.^
Extremique hominum Morini Rhenusque bicornis.
The Morini were a powerful people, contiguous to the sea, as
the name implies, in the north-west of Gaul. Their territory
was comprised in the ancient diocese of Therouanne, which is
now sub-divided into three — Boulogne, St. Omer, and Ypres.
Under the organisation of Augustus the Morini were a "civitas,"
• Epist ad Ageruchium De Monogamia, 16-18, Migne, vol. 22, col. 1,057.
* Martin's " Hist, of France,' vol. I., 336.
^ Quis hoc credet ? Quae digno sermone historia comprehendet ? Romam
in gremio suo noa pro gloria sed pro salute pugnare. — lb. 2J, coL 1,058.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 133
an administrative centre, a city state. This was more than a
town and its suburbs. It was a territory which included several
small towns as well as the chief city, some villages as
well as a vast number of small properties. The rural districts
(pagi) and the villages (vici) were part of the civitas and the
most important proprietors generally held the magistracies in
the chief city, and formed the bulk of the curia or city senate,
and were styled decuriones.^ Taruanna was the chief city of
the Morini. It was situated at the head waters of the Letia
(now Lys), an important river which flows from the Pas de
Calais and joins the Scheldt at Ghent, after a course of 150
miles. This was the trade route from the Rhine to Britain. It
was one of the four routes from Gaul mentioned by Strabo,
the others being from the Garonne, the Loire, and the Seine.
" For such as set sail from the parts about the Rhine," he says,
*' the passage is not exactly from the mouths of the Rhine but
from the Morini, who border the Menapii, among whom is also
situated, I learn, Itium (Boulogne), which the deified Ccesar
used as a naval station."^ Taruanna was thus a very important
commercial and military position. The name seems to be
derived from two Celtic words signifying the Thor of the River,^
Let us now examine what St. Patrick says in bis Confessions
about his birthplace^ : —
I had for my father Calporniis, a dejicon [decurion 1] (the son of
Potitus, a priest, the son of Odissus), who lived in the Vicus Bannauem
of Tabernia. For he had a small property hard by where I was taken
prisoner, when I was nearly sixteen years of age. / knew not God
truly, and I was brought captive to Ireland with so many thousands, as
we deserved, for we had fallen away from God and not kept his
commandments, and were not obedient to our priests, who admonished
us for our salvation.
[A ^ Fistel de Coulanges. Instel Polet, vol. I., 228. [Ed. 1001.]
' Strabo, iv., 51-3.
8 " Teronanne et Acqs en Provence etaientles denx oreillers siir lesquelB le
roi de France pouvait dormir en paix." Paroles de Francis I. Tor, as we
have already stated, meant a fenced town or buttery, from the root " tver," to
hold or enclose. We invite our readers to keep it well in mind, as it appears
in various forms, particularly in " nem thor," to be mentioned hereafter.
" Uanna," the second moiety of Taruanna, is from abha gen. abhann, a
river, so we suggest that, Taruanna meant fenced town or buttery of the river
[Lys]. Abann is pronounced " Ouann," and Thor-ouaiin is not very different
in pronounciation from the modern word Therouanne.
Gregory of Tours styles the inhabitants Tar-abennenses. — Hist, iv., 19.
* Too much strecs has, we think, been laid on the rudeness of our Saint's
Latin. He was conscious of this himself, and refers to it, which is evidence
that there was a period of his life when he could have done better. As it is, his
184 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Let US for a moment assume that the Vicus Bannauem
TabernisB means a village (or village district) in the city state
of Taruanna, We know as historical facts that there were
very many thousand persons taken prisoners, and, presumably,
sold as slaves, about the year 407 or 408 A.D., from the civitas
of Taruanna and the adjoining territories, and that there were
many priests ministering in these regions at that time. No
other place has been suggested as the birthplace of our saint
of which the same can be said, as we shall show when dealing
with the claims of Alclyde or Dumbarton to that distinction.
Again, in the epistle to Coroticus, which, if not genuine in this
part, was certainly composed by one who had the genuine
confession before him, it is stated that Calpornius was a deciirio
In the confession, deacon should probably be deciirio, as it
appears to explain why he was a decurio by adding for he had
a small estate (the usual qualification for a decurio), hard by.
There is not a shred of evidence above ground or under ground,
by written record, monumental inscription or even by unreason-
able conjecture that there ever was a cur la or a decurion^'^ at
Alclyde or anywhere north of the city of York during the whole
Roman occupation of Britain. In the early centuries of our
era as well as in later times the villa meant a very large estate.
genders, cases, optatives, and subjunctives, and the " other torments " of our
youth, seem to be right enough. Having turned our twelfth lustrum, however,
we speak subject to correction. His principal deficiency appears to us to be
scantiness of his vocabulary and a tendency to transfer the Gaehc idiom into his
style, e.g., " dedi capturam " is probably C15AI1 fUAf, "gave himself up,"
rather than vras captured." On the whole, we doubt if an Oxford prizeman
\5'ent as a missionary to Tanganyika, and having spoken the local vernacular for
sixty years, wrote an apologia after turning ninety 5'ears of age — we doubt, we
say, if he would do much better. St. Patrick was, no doubt, taught Greek anil
Latin until he was nearly sixteen years of age. Bilingual instruction was the
ordinary course in the schools, not only in the Province, but also in the three
Gauls, and both languages were in common use in Marseilles and tlie South of
France, where he made his studies afterwards.
Deumverum iqnoraham. — This is usually translated I did not know the
true God ; but the context proves that this is not correct. For how could he
fall away from the true God if he did not know him. He was. of course, in-
structed in at least the elementary doctrines of the Christian religion by the
priests he refers to. We may state here that our chapters about St. Patrick were
written and printed in the New If eland Revieiv before we saw the Latin V/ritmgs
of St. Patrick by Dr. White, D.D. We have read his valuable contribution
with great care, but find nothing to alter in our views or in our translations,
which differ materially from his. See Proc. Ry. Ir. Acad., vol. 25, p. 201.
'' Bury refers to Kiibler's article Decurio to prove the existence of
Decurions in smaller towns. But Kubler mentions no case in Britain. Life of
St. Patrick, p. 290.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 185
Tacitus speaks of" villarum infinita spatia " villas, i.e., domains
of interminable extent. The diminutive " villula " was the
moderate sized estate, also styled "curialis." The owner stood
between the great proprietors (potentiores possessores) and the
peasant proprietors (possessores minores).^^ The order of
decurions was composed almost exclusively of such owners.
There is an Idyll of Ausonius entitled Ausonii Villulam,
written about this time, -^.e., "the little estate of Ausonius."
" It is small, I confess," he salys, " but no estate is small for a
well-balanced mind."^'^ The Villula was situated near
Bordeaux, and consisted of 200 jugera (each Vg acre) of tilth,
lOOjugera of vineyard, 50 jugera of meadow, and 700 jugera of
wood, in all 1,050 jugera ; say 650 acres. The villula referred
to in the confession may have been quite as large. Its extent
is not of material importance here. It was, at any rate,
sufficient to qualify for the burdensome office of a decurio, i.e.,
over 25 jugera.
Again, the place referred to as Tabernia must have been a
well-known place. The confession does not state where it was
situated. The writer evidently thought it was unnecessary
to do so. No one nowadays would think of stating that
Boulogne was in France. Taruanna was just as famous then
as Boulogne is now. Could this be affirmed of any other place
claiming to be the Saint's birthplace ?
The words " in vico Bannauem Tabernias " next claim
our attention. " Vicus " had many meanings. In the time
we write of it meant (1) a street. There was a vicus Patricus
in olden Rome. It meant (2) an urban district, say a parish.
It also meant (3) a village or rural district. Joubert says
" there were 10,000 vici, 400 pagi, and about 100 nations in
Gaul in Caesar's time, and the vici correspond to the modern
communes." ^^ A passage of Ulpian places our contention
beyond doubt. It provides "that a person born in a vicus is
deemed in law to be a citizen by birth of the city state to
" This distinction is found in the Theodosian Code (3So A.D.) xi, 7. 12.
^ Parvum heredioliim, fateor. sed nulla fuit rea.
Parva unquara aequanimis. — Idyll III.
Ausonius was afterwards tutor to Gratian, the son of the Emperor Valen-
tinian, and Consul, A.D. 379. — " De rhetore Consul."
" Joubert "La Gaule." 134.
136 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
which that vicus appertained (qui ex vico ortus est earn
patriam intelligitur habere respublicae cni vicus ille respondet.
— Digest L. 30). We suggest that the vicus Bannauem
appertained to the city state Taruanna. The omission of
inflection, i.e., Banuauem instead of Bannauensi makes no
difficulty. It was usual at this period in the case of such
names.
The real question is, does " Tabernise " stand in the text
of the confession for "Taruannge." If Taber-nise be divided
into its component parts, and if the " b " inTaber be aspirated
then the pronounciation would be " thour " which would be
nearly the same as " tar," pronounced " thaur." The second
part " uannee " would then be represented by " nise," the
intervening vowels " ua " being omitted. The Irish ortho-
graphy of Latin words had several peculiarities, many of
which are conveniently enumerated by Gilbert in the intro-
duction to Lis Fac-svniile M.S. It will suffice for us to mention
the following — " Ch " for " h," e.g. Abracham, " 1 " omitted,
"audens" for "audiens," "i" inserted, "e" forage," "q"
for "c," qu for " c," "f'for " d." In this way Taber-[i]-niiE,
pronounced Thor-i-nias comes very close to the modern name
Therouanne. The view we are suggesting will appear more
clearly from the words of Muirchu, which are copied, we may
assume, by Probus. Muirchu wrote his notes about the life of
our saint under the direction and supervision of Aedh, Bishop
of Sleibhte (in the Queen's Co., near Carlo y/), who died in the
year 60S A.D.^*
Muirchu's words, which we take from the Documenta
Patriciana are (abridged) as follows : —
" Patricius, qui et Socket vocabatur, Brito natione in
Britannis natus. Caulfarni diaconi ortus filio ut ipse ait
Potiti presbyteri qui fuit (de) Vico Ban navemthaburindecha
ut procul a mari nostro." We pause to suggest that the words
should be divided, spaced, and written as follows : — " de vico
Bannavem Thabher inde (thaur-inne) chaut (i.e. hand) procul a
mari nostro." The Life by Probus follows Muirchu closely, and
he had, no doubt, before him the first leaf of the notes by
1* Muirchu dictante Aeduo Slebtiensis civitatisepiscopo couscripsit. Dictare
oporam significare videtur pr^eesse operariis eisque normam tradere atjue
ordinem structioDis.-— Du Caage.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 187
Muirchu. which is now missing from the book of Armagh.
Father Hogan's text is taken from a MS. in the Royal Library
at Brussels. Probus is identified by Colgan with Coenechair,
a professor or head master in the School of Slane, on the
Boyne, who died about the year 950. His words are : — " Sanctus
Patricius qui et Socket vocabatur Brito fuit natione . . . Hie
in Britaniis natus est a patre Calpurnio diacono qui fuit filius
Potiti presbyteri . . . de vico Bannaue Tiburniae regionia
haud procul a. mari occidentali."
Muirchu continued : — Quem vicum constanter indubitan-
terque comperimus esse ventre {prius venitre ?),which " vicus "
we have found without any doubt or difference of opinion to be
of ventra or venitra. Probus has " quem vicum indubitantsr
comperimus esse Nentreae or Neutreae (Todd), provinciae qua
dim gigantes* habitasse dicuntur," which vicus we hold to be
without doubt of the province of Nentria or Neutria, in which
the giants are said to have dwelt formerly. There can be no
doubt, ws think, that " Nentriae " or " Neutriae " in Probus
represents the word ventre [i.e. ventrae] or venitrae in the
Brussels text of Muirchu.^^ It was understood so by Lanigan,
and must mean Neustria, which was also called Neptria and
Nevtria. It comprised at this time the territory between the
Meuse and the Loire.^°
After his capture our Saint was sold " with many thou-
sands " into Erin. Slaves were a drug in the market at that
time. Two years previously, A.D. 405, Stilicho had forced the
army of Radagaisus to surrender in the Tuscan hills to the
number, some say, of 200,000 ! " They were sold as slaves, and
*Gieai^tes. — This has no meaning here. There is no record or myth about,
giants dwellins in North Western Gaul. We conjecture Brigantes, which, after
the fashion of his age. Probus connected etymologically and genealofrically with
Britania, Bre^/i-an, and Bn7/i-an being similar in sound in Gaelic pronunciation. ^
Socket, afterwards SAjA-jir, was probably the first Gaelic attempt at / ,
Sacerdos — which meant bishop as well as priest. /
^^ Hogan E., S.J., Documenta de S. Patricio Analecta Bollondiana, vol. 1.,
p. 549 ; Todd, p. 357 ; Colgan, Acta, SS. ii. 51.
^8 Partem ad occasum solis vergentem quae inter Mosam et Ligerem inter-
jacet Neustriam vel Neustrasiam et nonunquam Neptricam vel Neptriam voca-
verunt. — Valesius Notitia G allea mm (li\l 5), p. 372.
^■^ Orosius — Tanta vero multitudo captivorura Gothorum fuisse fertur, ut
vili3^imorum pecudnm modo singulis aureis passim greges hominum vende-
rentur. — vii., S6. Migae 3i, 1161.
138 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
fetched only the price of cattle, an aureus (12s.) apiece. This
may account for the vast importation mentioned in the Con-
fession, to which we now return.
He became the slave of Milchu, the King of North Dala-
radia, who lived in the valley of the Braid, near the hill of
Slemish, about five miles from Ballymena, in the county of
Antrim. The Confession proceeds : —
But after I had come to Ireland I daily used to herd cattle, and I
prayed frequently, and in the one day I said about one hundred
prayers, and as many in the night. And one night in my sleep I heard
a voice saying to me " Thou fastest -svell ; thou shalt soon go to thy
fatherland," and ao-ain after a short time I heard an answer saving to me
" Behold thy ship is ready." And it was not near, but perhaps 200
(Roman) miles away (184 statute miles). After this I took flight and
left the man with whom I had been for six years. And J feared
nothing until I had arrived at that ship, and on the day I arrived the
ship moved out of its place {i.e., from the beach), and I told them I
was away from the wherewithal (to give) that I might sail with
them.^^ And it displeased the captain, and he answered sharply with in-
dignation, " By no means seek to go with us." And 1 separated myself
from them and was going on my way, when one of them called out,
" Come quickly, the men are calling you." I returned and they
said, " Come, we take you on credit and help us (lit. do friendship with
us) as you please." That day, however, I refused to eat their food,
through the fear of God, and after (a voyage of) three days we reached
land.
We suggest that the first part of this journey was from
Slemish to Sligo, or more probably to Killala, near which was
the wood of Foclat, where he took ship for the mouth of the
Loire. 1^. The cargo consisted chiefly of dogs, which the owner
^^ Et i1la die qua perveni profec<"a est navis, de loco suo et locutus sum ut
ahirem unde navigarera cuin illis. The Armagh text has abirem. The Cotton
MS. has haberem. We suggest aheram, the meaning being that he had not
the money to pay his fare at that time, but would pay at ^Marseilles where he
had friends. This corresponds to the following "ex fide" on credit [Veni
quia ex fide recipimus te]. Sugere mammillas, suck their paps, means eat their
food. Our Saint scrupled to do so lest it might be an idol offering. White
quotes with approval Bury: — " Professor Bury has kindly communicated to me
after the Latin text was printed the following note — ' I take Sugere mamellas
to be an interesting piece of evidence for a ceremoay or primitive adoption ! ' "
— Proc. Ry, Jr. Acad., vol. 26, p. 321.
^^ The land journey was, we think, from Slemish to the Cutts at the Bann,
near Coleraine, thence to Derry, thence by the Gap of Barnesmore to Donegal,
thence to Ballyshanaon, tlience to Sligo, thence to Ballina, thence to Killala.
We are unable to state exact figures for these distances, but conjecture from
map measurements that going by the ordinary routes it could not have been less
than 15') miles, and a runaway slave would not be likely to keep to the high-
ways, and stating a round number from recollection would not be far astray
ia mentioning 200 Roman or 18i English miles as the length of his journey.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 139
wastakin? to Marseilles. The voyage over tlie sea conld be
accomplished in 3 days. Philip O'Sullivan Beare in his Decas
Patritiana, says, as already stated, it was scarcely more than
a two days' voyage from Ireland to France, or than a three
days' voyage from Ireland to Spain, i.e., from Kinsale to
Coriinna.2''
The Gaelic and Celtic hounds were greatly prized by the
Italians and Provencal villa proprietors, who usually kept packs
of hounds for hunting game, a sport in which they greatly de-
lighted. These dogs were also used for games and exhibitions
in the circus. Symachus, consul A.D, 391, thanks his brother
Flavianus for sending seven Gaelic dogs (canum Scoticorum
oblatio) which the Romans received with such astonishment
on the day of the games that they thought they must
have been brought in iron cages [as if they were lions or
tigers.]^^
In Claudian the dogs are represented as follow-
inar the huntress Diana and her five lieutenants in their
quest for wild beasts to win plaudits for the consul
(Stilicho). Amongst other dogs he mentions the Britannte,
i.e., the Scotic dogs, dogs that will break the necks
of mighty bulls. (Magnaque taurarum fracturae colla
Britannae,)-"^
The Confession does not mention what the party
ditl when they arrived in France, nor does the samt
say afterwards what he did when the Lord delivered
him from their hands. From the time he went on
board ship until his liberation he tells us sixty days
elapsed, of which twenty-eight were spent in the desert,
two resting, and ten finishing the journey, making in all
forty days. Of the balance of twenty days, three were spent on
the voyage, and the remaining seventeen days, about which
nothing is said, were probably spent in landing, making pre-
parations for the journey, and going forward as far as the
2" Euronotum versus Galliam (Scotia) habet vix plus duoruni dierum marino
itinere remotam. Hispanias tridui normal! cursu dissitas a Libonoto sive
Africo in aquilonem ventum occurrentes spectat. — Decas p. 2 (1619).
21 See "The Irish Wolf Dog." E. Hogan, S.J., passim.
83 In II. Cons. Stilich, Lib., 361.
140 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
desert. The reference to this journey in Fiacc's Hymn is as
follows : —
" Said Victor to Milchu's bondsman that he should go over
the waves,
He [i.e. Victor] set his foot on the flag stone ; its trace
remains, it wears not away,
He sent him over all the Alps [tar Elpa huile], Great God
it was a marvel of a coiir.se,
So that he left him with Gerraanus in the South, in the
soiithern part of Letha.
In the i.sles of the Southern Sea he fasted ; therein he
meditates.
He read the Canon with Germanus ; this is what the written
lines declare."
After landing at the mouth of the Loire, we suggest, the
party proceeded towards Orleans, probably keeping near the
river. This occupied the better part of seventeen days. East of
Orleans, a great forest then covered the upland between the
Loire and the Seine. Until recent times this region was so
thinly populated that it was known as the Gatinais, or wilder-
ness— Gatine was old French for desert. This was part of the
desert referred to in the Confession. If the party then followed
the course of the Loire — " the Loire of the Alps," as it is
called in the text already mentioned — they would reach the
Morvan, which is a promontory jetting out from the Massif
Central (Cevennes), twenty miles broad and forty miles long.
The Loire, which rises in the Massif Central at an elevation
of 4,511 feet above the level of the sea, and has a course of 620
miles, passes alongside of the Morvan as it flows north-west to
Orleans. After crossing the Morvan the party would descend
into the narrow valley of the Rhone, which separates the
Massif Central from the Alps, of which it is geologically an out-
post. South of this lay the Provincia, which was not part of
the " Three Gauls," and which, as Pliny wrote, was more truly
Italia than a " Provincia." The Alps crossed by our
Saint was some spur of the Massif Central and the Italy
into which he descended, was the Provincia,^ and the
islands south of Italy were the islands in the Mediter-
ranean south of this Italy. This view explains the
83 Breviterqus Italia verius quam Provincia. — Pliny N.H., iii„ 4.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 141
Dictum Patricii. "I bad the fear of God to guide me on
my journey through the Gauls and Italy in(to) the islands in
the Tyrrhene Sea.-"^
The word Italia had at this time, after the territorial changes
introduced by Diocletian, many significations. The one
thing it did not mean in the official language was Italy as a
geographical unit by itself. For instance — 1st., the Prefecture
of Italy included the dioceses of Italy, Illyricum, and Africa ;
2nd., the Diocese of Italy included Italy, Tyrol, Grisons, and
South Bavaria. Ruffi, the historian of Marseilles, writes of
going from the Province into Gaul. It need not surprise us,
therefore, to find the " furthest of men " at this time regarding
a province which was not a part of the " three Gauls "as part
and parcel of Italy itself. So in the Tripartite Life (239)
Burdigala (Bordeaux) is referred to as being in Letavia (Italy).
'• He left Sechnall in the bishopric with the men of Erin until
the ship should come from Burdigala of Letavia to carry him.
Patrick went in this and came to Rome."
Our readers may ask, Why did the party proceed through
the forests ? Was there not a highway from Marseilles to Lyons
by the left bank of the Rhone, and from Lyons to Orleans and
Tours on the Loire 1 The answer is, there was ; but the bye-ways
were then -safer than the highways. The country had been
laid waste by the barbarians, and, in all probability, neither
food nor lodging for man or beast could be obtained along the
great Roman road. Writing in 416 or 417 a.d., a poet,
supposed by some to be Prosper of Aquitaine, says : — " For
ten years we have been cut down by the swordsof the Vandals
and the Goths ; if the whole ocean was poured into Gaul
more would be left above the waters. So many cities have
perished, what crimes did the citizens commit ? So many
blameless youths, so many maidens. How had they
offended ? "^^
24 Timorem Dei habui ducem itineris mei per Gallias atque Italiam etiam
ki insulis quae sunt ia mari Terreno.
^ Carmen de Providentia
Si totus gallos sese effudisset in agros
Oceanus, vastis plus superesset aquis
Heu coede decenni.
Vandalicis gladiis sternimur et Geticis
Quo sceleri admisso pariter periere tot urbes ?
Quid pueri insonte.'J, Quid commisere puellae ?
Migne, vol. 51, col, 617.
142 EAET.Y IRISH HISTORY.
The Confession continues : —
And we journeyed for 28 days through a desert, and food failed
them and liunger prevailed over them, ;ind one day the gubernator said
to me : " How is it, Christian, you say your God is all powerful ? Why
therefore canst thou not pray for us since we are like to die of hun^-er,
and 'tis hard if ever we see the face of man again 1 " Now I said
plainly to them, " turn ye with faith to the Lord, my God, to whom
nothing is impossible, that he may send you food on your way until you
have enough, because everywhere there is abundance with Him ? " And
lo ! a herd of swine appeared on the way before our eyes and they
killed many of them, and they remained there two nights, and they
were well recruited and their dogs were filled. After this they gave
the greatest thanks to God. They found, moreover, wild honey, and
offered me some, and one of them said " it is an idol offering " (immo-
laticum). Thank God after that I tasted none of it. And that same
night Satan tempted me greatly in a way that I shall remember as
long as I am in this body. And he fell upon me like a huge rock and
I had no power on my limbs save that it came home into my mind that
I should call out Helias ('EXtftwoi/?) "'' and in that moment I saw
the sun rise in the heavens, and while I was calling out Helias
('EX£€£ffo»') with all my might, behold, the splendour of the sun fell
upon me and at once removed the weight from me and I believe that
1 was aided by Christ, my Lord, and His spirit was then crying out for
me, and I hope it will be thus in the day of trial (die pressurae). And
further, I was seized by many (spirits). On that first night, then,
that I remained with them I heai-d the divine voice, " You
will be with them for two months." And so it was. On
the 60 night the Lord delivered me from their hands. On our route
too He provided for us food and fire and dry weather every day until
on the tenth day we all arrived. As I stated before, we had made a
journey of 28 days through the desert; and on the night we arrived
we had indeed no food left.
^ Heliam vocarem. We su^uest " EXftiffov " — Have mercy. This is in-
dicated by the context and by the following dectum Patricii.
Ecclesia Scotorum immo Romanorum ; ut Christeani ita ut
Romani sitis ut decantabitur vobiscum oportet omni hora orationis vox
ilia laudabilis " Curie lession Christe lession." ' Omnis Ecclesia quae
sequitur me cantet ' Curie lession Christe lession, Deo gratias.'
The Church of the Scots now is the Church of the Romans ; as you
are Christian that you may be likewise Roman, it is needful that you
should sing at every hour of prayer that laudable chant Kvpu iXiuaov
XpioT£ eXieiffov. Every Church that follows me will sing Kvpie kXUiaov
Xpccrre iXitfaov, Thanks to God, ordinary pronunciation now is Kwptf XiiaZv
or Kfpte Xrjerjoi'. The Gaelic pronunciation of " lession " is " lessin."
We are unable to accept Bury's version "Ciiurch of the Scots now of the
Romans in order that you may be Christians as well as Romans it behoves that
there should be chanted in your churches, etc." The plural " satis " excludes
this. St. Patrick, p. 229, and see Academy, Aug., 18S8, p. 89.
Dicta Patricii. — Analecta BoUandiana I. 585. — Rolls scr. IV. 301.
Multos adhuc capturam dedi.
We think roultis animis=daemonibus is the only reading that will make sense.
Ferguson says the confession here refers to " a continuing spiritual captivity. "
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 143
When St. Patrick arrived at Marseilles, Cassian was build-
ing, or had just built, the Monastery of St. Victor, which was
destined to be afterwards one of the wealthiest and most
celebrated in France. It was built over the " Confession " or
tomb of the Soldier Martyr, St. Victor, who had suffered for the
faith during the Diocletian persecution on the 22nd of July
303, on which day the feast of St. Mary Magdalen is now
celebrated therein. He was a native of Marseilles, flis body
was dismembered, and with the bodies of others who suffered
at the same time, thrown by the executioners into the sea.
His townsmen gathered the remains from the beach and
placed them in the crypts, over which the monastery was built,
near the cubiculum, or cell of Mary Magdalen. Lazarus and
Mary and Martha were, according to the tradition of the
church in Provence, driven from Palestine after the Ascension
of our Lord and fled to Marseilles, and were the pioneers of
Christianity there. These crypts were originally natural caves
and passages in a limestone hill near the harbour. When
Caesar besieofed the town in 49 B.C., on this hill it was that
the celebrated Druid's grove was situated, which struck such
awe into his soldiers that to dissipate their terror ha took up
an axe and dealt the first blows to a venerable oak.^^
The truth of the tradition was assailed by Launay and his
school in the I7th century. It has been ably defended by
many writers, amongst others by the Bishop of Angers, then
professor at the Sorbonne, who, in the course of his lecture on
" The First Apostles of Gaul," made the following admirable
observations, which we have endeavoured to apply to our own
traditions, and deem it not superfluous to quote in this place :
They have violated the rules of sound criticism. If they had
confined themselves to saying that amongst the legends of the first
apostles of Gaul, composed after the lapse of many centuries and
grounded on popular tradition, there were some which mixed up with
^ Gregory of Tours, Multismiraculis celeherimum. De gloria Matty rum.
Lib. I.
Ruinart Acta Marty rum (Ed. 1853) p. 333.
Notice sur les Crypts de VAbhaye Saint Victor pres. Marseilles, 1864.
A very interesting notice by an anonymous writer, with a plan of the Crypts ;
only 40 copies printed.
Faillon M., M onuments inedits sur Vapostolat de Sainte Marie Madeleine
en Provence.
144 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
an incontestable body of facts, inexact details and apocryphal traits
added thereto by the popular imagination and the simplicity of writers,
they %vould have kept within the bounds of calm and impartial
discussion. If this principle had been accepted the way would have
been clearly marked out for a methodical search for truth. To study
those old legends without bias towards praise or censure, as so much
primitive tradition, often enlarged and embellished with a view to
edification, to examine with care their origin or their value, to extract
the historical element which is often shut up in them under the veil of
poetry, to strip the principal fact of accessory circumstances subse-
quently worked in, such is the task a sound criticism has to perform.
But there is rashness, to say the least of it, in refusing all belief to
these legendary narratives, in rejecting absolutely the " ensemble " as
well as the details, the body of facts as well as the foreign additions.
It carries no small authority, what a church by unbroken tradition
testifies as to the name, the life, and the works of its founder.^
The truth of this tradition and, what concerns us more
nearly, the great evangelizing work done by the Monastery of
St. Victor, are attested by the Bull or Privilegium of Pope
Benedict IX. After being completely destroyed by the
Saracens in the 9th century, the structure was rebuilt and re-
dedicated in 1040. " The rededication," says Ruffi, " was one of
the most illustrious that history records." The Pope performed
the ceremony of rededicating the two churches, the uppei
church dedicated to SS. Peter and Paul, and the lower church,
in which were the confession of St. Victor and the relics of the
martyrs, and many religious treasures. The Counts of Provence,
the Viscounts of Marseilles, the Archbishops of Aries, Valence,
Aix, and Embrun, and some twenty suffragan bishops took
part in the function. Numerous abbots and religious, in all
Qearly ten thousand persons, were assembled, It was on this
occasion that the Privilegium or Bull was issued, from which
we take the following abridged extract : —
With the same care we determined to confirm this monastery,
founded near Marseilles in the time of Antoninus Pius, and afterwards
built by the blessed abbot Cassian and consecrated at his request by
the most blessed Leo, Bishop of Rome * * * which was augmented
with many honours and charters by emperors and kings, and enriched
with the relics of the holy martyrs Victor and his companions and of
^ Freppel C. E., Bishop of Angers : Irenee et I'iloquence Chretienne dans
la Gaule pendant les deux premiers sieclcs. Cours d'eloqueace sacriie fait a la
Sorbomie pendant I'ano^e I8uO-1861, p. 46.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 145
Lazarus raised from the dead, and of the inmimerable martyrs, con-
fessors, and virgins, as is testified in many volumes of sacred litera-
ture,^
It roas from this monastery that Cassian first shone forth to pro-
mulgate everywhere in Western pdrts the monastic rule for the perfect
and regular way of monastic life ; and this ^nonastery in the love of
Christ its spotise zvas so persevering in its mission that its voice went
forth into every land and its teaching like a bright lamp, spread the
light to the ends of the earth.^' ^"
Cassian was probably born in Lesser Scythia, in some
trading station of the Marsellaise in that territory, near the
mouths of the Danube. He was educated at Bethlehem, and
afterwards went to Egypt, where he spent seven years visiting
anchorites and cenobites, from the mouth of the Nile to the
first cataract. He received deacon's orders from St. John
Chrysostom, and was ordained priest by Pope Innocent I.
Leaving Rome, he arrived in Marseilles about the year 410, the
year in which St. Honoratus founded the celebrated monastery
at Lerins, and built his monastery, which shortly reckoned
5,000 monks attached to the parent house and its dependencies.
It was called the "gate of paradise," ^^ and is perhaps referred
to in the dictum of our Saint, who may have been inwardly
contrasting its peaceful life there with his strenuous militancy.
"■ From the world " says the Dictum, " you have retired into
Paradise." (De Saccule requisisstis ad paradissum).^^
There were two classes of monks, of which Ruffi gives an
interesting description. The first were the Cenobites. These
led a life in common under the Abbot, or Prior. Amongst these
were ononarchi ad succurenchiTii, persons of the first quality,
struck with a dangerous illness, who put on the sackcloth of
penitence to gain the spiritual aid of the monks, by becoming
members of the " Corps " of the Monastery. If they recovered,
29 B.um, Histoire de Marseille, vol. II., 25.
^ Nam et in occiduis partibus ad monachorum profectum et regularem
tramitem Cassianus hinc primus emicuit, ad promulgandura circiimquaqua
Monachorum legem, quodque monasterium ita ia amore Christi sponsi ambieiis
perduravit ut in omnem terram sonus ejus exiret, et in fines orbis terrae ejus
doctrina et lucerna fulgens luceret.
Privil. Bened., ix. ann. MXL., printed by
Faillon, M. Abbe, Monuments inedits sttr I'apostolat de Sainte Marie
Madeleine en Provence et sur les autres apotres, etc., 1848, Vol. II., p. 635.
*^ Ruffi, " Ce monastere etait appele la parte de Paradis," Vol. II., p. 114.
^ Tri-p. Life Pv.S., 103. Requissisti3=recessisti5, qu being often used fore.
L
146 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
they ■were obliged to wear the habit and live according to
monastic discipline. The second class were the Anchorites ;
these shut themselves up in cells, huts, caunes or recluseries,
which the Abbot of St. Victor had got built in the neiehbour-
hood. They did not make much ditference between the cells
and the huts, both being hermitages, composed of several
(cellules) small cells. The monks who wished to live in strict
solitude retired to the cells. Those who lived in the huts had
a superior over them, and met together every Saturday and
Sunday for the " office " in the church of the Hermitage. The
Reclusi (inclusi) lived more retired, for they took a vow never
to leave their cells, where they had a little garden and a little
oratory to celebrate Mass. They could only communicate
with seculars through a window, through which they heard
confessions — even those of women. After they were enclosed,
the seal of the Abbot was placed on the door of the cell, which
was opened only in case of dangerous illness. Even then the
incluse was not allowed to leave the cell.^^ The latter form of
life was much encouraged by Cassian. Addressing certain holy
brothers in A.D. 428, he writes: "You, by your instructions,
have stirred up monks, not only before all^ to seek the common
life of the ccenobia, but even to thirst eagerly for the sublime
life of the anchorite." The conferences were arranged with
such care " that they are suited to both modes of life, whereby
you have made not only the countries of the West, but even
the islands, to flouiish with great crowds of brethren." 2*
It was these islands, no doubt the Stoechades and others,
that our saint visited in the Tyrrhene Sea. St. Honoratus,
too, the friend of Cassian, " honoured," as he says in the pre-
face to the 18th conference, "in his name and in his works,"
received him, doubtless, with open arms. All flocked to
Honoratus, says his biographer, S. Hilarius, " for what country,
what nation is there that has not citizens in his monastery ? " ^^
It was a school of Theology and Christian Philosophy, as well
as an asylum for literature and art. Cassian advised his monks
S3 Ruffi, vol. 2, p. 135.
8* Cassian, Preface to iSth Conference.
*^ Omnes undique al ilium, confluebant. Etenim quse adhuc terra qua?
natio in Monastereo illius Gives noa habet ?— S. Hilar. Vita S. Honor. C. 175,
S. Honoratus died in 428.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 147
to avoid bisbops — that is, to remain laymen. The Monastery of
St. Victor did not make any provision for studies preparatory
to the priesthood.
There can be little doubt that our apostle made his
theological studies " in the nursery of bishops and saints."
St. Honoratus became the metropolitan of Aries (Arelatensis)
and died a.d. 428. The island is still called after him — L'Isle
de S. Honorat. This was the tradition of the Irish Church.
Tirechan says " He was in one of the islands, which is called
Aralanensis {i.e., Sancti Honorati Arelatensis), 30 years, as
Bishop Ultan testified to me. ' St. Lupos, a disciple of St.
Germanus, was at this time a student at Lerins, He was soon
after chosen by Troyes for its bishop, and accompanied St.
Germanus to Britain in 429. St. Germanus became Bishop of
Auxerre in 418, and immediately founded there an establish-
ment, which became one of the most celebrated abbeys in
France of the Middle Ages.^^
'^ Erat hautem in una ex insulis quae dicitur aralanensis, annis XXX, , mihi
testante Ultano episcopo. The letter numeraL are of course, as frequently
happens, erroneous. Trip. Life, R.S., 302. The Scholiast on Fiacc refers to
the island oi A I anen sis as the place where St, Patrick got the staff of Jesus.
Se^ Trip. Ltfe, 420.
[ us ]
CHAPTER X.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. — II.
THE tradition of the Irish Church is that our Saint studied
under Germanus. This is corroborated by the testimony
of Hericus (834-883), who was a monk in his monastery.
Referring tC' the disciples of St. Germanus, he says : —
Since the glory of the father shines in the training of the children,
of the many sons in Christ whom St. Germanus is believed to have had
as disciples in religion, let it suffice to make mention here, very briefly,
of one most famous — Patrick, the Apostle all by himself [peculiaris), of
the Hibernian region, as the record of his work proves. Subject to
that most holy discipleship for eighteen years, he drank in no little
knowledge in Holy Scripture from the stream of so great a well-spring.
Germanus sent him by Segetius, his priest, to Celestine, Pope of Rome,
approved' of by whose judgment, supported by whose authority, and
strengthened by whose blessing, he went on his way to Ireland.^
The Scholiast on Fiacc says : — " Germanus, abbot of the
city called Altiodorus {i.e., Autissiodorum, Auxerre). It is with
him that Patrick read, and Burgundy is the name of the
province in which that city stands. In the south in Italy that
province used to be, but it is more correct to say it is in the
Gauls." 2
The geography of Burgundy is complex. There was at
one timea Cisjuran Burgundy, the capital of which was Aries,
"in Italy in the South." There was a Transjuran Burgundy
* Et quoniara gloria patris in suorum clarescit moderamine filiorum, multos
quos Iq Christo filios in religions creditur habinsse discipulos, unius tantum
ejusdemque famossissimi castigata brevitate sufficiet inseri mentionem, Patrieius
ut gestorum ejnB series prodit Hibernicae peculiaris apostolus regionis sanctis-
simo ei discipulatui octodecim acidictus anais non mediocrem e tanti vena fontis
in Scripturis coelestibus hausit eruditionem ... ad Sanctum Coelestinum urbis
Romas papam per Segetium presbyterum suum eum direxit . . . Cujus Judicio
approbatus auetoritate fultus, benedictione denique roboratus Hiberniai partes
expetiit.— ^c.'a SS. Boll, vol. 34, p. 270, ed. 18GS, July 3Ist.
It is right to state that in an earlier life by Coustantius about A.D. 488 no
mention is made of St. Patrick, but this negative evidence is not of much
weight.
Eighteen (Octodecim) years is a mistake ; probably scribal.
2 See Irish Tract also, which ia given with translation in " Moraa's Essays,"
p. 248.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 149
north of this. And later there was the province of Bur2:undy
in the Kingdom of France, in the north of which was situated
Auserre, 107 miles S.E. of Paris. The Scholiast has also a
Scholium on " La German andes in descairt Letlia (with
Germanus in the south, in the southern partof Letha), which is
important: — "Letha, i.e., Latium, which is also called Italy.
Howbeit Germanus was in the Gauls, as Beda says ; Lethaig,
(Letevians) that is in latitudine, in the South of Gaul, by
the Tyrrhene Sea."^ This seems to imply that the Lethaig,
or Letavia and Italia, were each south of the Gauls by the
Tyrrhene Sea, in his view.
The Cymri, in their dialect called Brittany Llydaw, which
Geoffrey of Monmouth rendered in Latin, Letavia. It means
" litorale " (coast-land), and it may be connected with " litus."
It was, no doubt, originally co-extensive with Armorica,
though, at a later period, after the immigration of the Britons
the name was usually applied in a restricted sense. It is to
be further observed that the name of the river Lys, on which
Taruanna stood, was Letia, which is nearer in sound to Letha
than either Latium or Letavia.
The author of the first part of Fiacc's Hymn in the eighth
century intends to follow the Confession, and, no doubt, was
icquainted with the Life by Muirchu. He says : — " Gennair
Patraice innemthur, ised adfet hiscelaib," (Patrick was born in
Nemthur, 'tis this he tells us in his books). These books were
the Confession and the Ej^istle, to Coroticus, which are styled
the Libri Patricii in our texts. Adfet used to be translated
"as is told," but the true meaning is "as he says," which
corresponds to Muirchu's " ut ipse ait."
This Nemthur appears in most if not in all the subsequent
lives. We suggest that "genair in Nemthur " = -Ma^us est ad
Taberniam. Thur or Tor would thus represent Taber, and
Nem would represent niam, the word being arranged Nemthur
to meet the exigencies of the metre. We are not, however,
dependent on linguistic considerations such as these alone to
prove that " Tabernia" represents Taruanna. No higher
authority on this point could be cited than M. Desjardins, the
2 Trip. Life, p. 418.
Kellesch, Spvachen Ersch., S. 143. •«-
Indogermanische Forschungen, iv., 85 (Thurnespen).
150 EARLY IRISH EISTORY.
author of the " Geography of Roman Gaul," and the
" Geography of Gaul after the Table of Peutinger," a magnifi-
cent edition of which he edited (1874). In the last-mentioned
work he gives (1) a summary or abstract of the names that
appear in the Table of Peutinger, and (2) an abstract of the
transformations or variants these names underwent during the
Middle Ages, as he found them written " in ancient authors
and inscriptions and on medals." — (p. xvii.)
In the Geography of Roman Gaul he tells us (ii. 489)
" The Morini, rendered less barbarous, no doubt, by the inter-
course the Portus Iccius (Boulogne) procured them, must have
had at a remote epoch ' a centre ' at Tarvanna (Therouanne)
which became their ' chef lieu de cite under the Romans.'
In the Historical Introduction and the Geography, according
to the Table of Peutinger (86), he gives the transformations
or variants of the name Tarvanna, i.e., Therouanne on the
Lys. ' The variants of the name he states thus, Teruenna,
Taverna, Teruentia." Now Taverna = Taberna or Tabernia,
the word we find in the text of the Confession. It is also =
Tauerna, which we have suggested was the Gaelic pronuncia-
tion of Tabernia. And this brings us back to the linguistic
point from which we started — to cop AbAnn, the fenced town or
buttery of the river Lys.
The Scholiast on Fiacc finds it necessary to tell his readers
where Nemthur is situate, " In Nemthor, that is a city which is
in North Britain — namely, Ail Cluade(Rock of Clyde)." There
is no evidence whatever that Ail Cluade, now Dumbarton, was
ever known as Nem-Thor. It was known as "Oun-tDficAin, i.e.,
the Fort of the Britons of Strathclyde. There were neither
decurions. Christians in thousands, or priests there at the end
of the fourth century. The following extract from the Edin-
burgh Review accurately represents the latest and best opinion
on the Roman occupation of Scotland : —
In 124 Hadrian, who loved strong frontiers, fortified the isthmus
between the Tyne and Solway, and declared the Roman advance to be
ended. Twenty years later Antoninus Pius built a second wall across
the isthmus between the Forth and the Clyde,^ still surviving in broken
fragments. But the Roman occupation of Scotland was limited, it was
* Ail Cluade is at this northern wall, which runs north of, and near to, the
river Clyde. See Haverfield's map, Britannia (1900).
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 151
purely military. It hardly lasted forty years. Recent investigations
into the inscriptions, coins, and other remains of Roman origin found
in Scotland show that all the land north of the Cheviots was lost to
Rome before the end of the second century. From henceforward the
Roman frontier was Hadrian's Wall, with outlying forts at one or two
places like Birens and Rochester, commanding the easiest passes into
Caledonia.
The land immediately south of the wall as far as the hills extend
was a purely military district. Throughout Cumberland, Westmore
land and Lancashire, on the west coast, and the North and "West
Ridings on the east coast, we meet no traces of orderly civil life, of
towns or villas, of trade or commerce, in Roman days. The Italian city
system did not spread in Britain. Its characteristic was a self-govern-
ing municipality. There was a senate, elected magistrature, and a
body of electing towns-people, -who all enjoyed the rights of Roman
citizens ; there was besides a dependent territory, which might be fifty
miles across. Towns of this kind bore the title of Colonia or Muni-
cipium, and were freelj' planted at various epochs in the western
provinces of the empire. They appear in every province where the
higher civilisations of Rome found. entrance. They mark its advent,
they assist in its expansion. Britain could boast of only five —
Verulamium, just outside St. Albans; Camulodunum, now Colchester j
Lincoln, York; and Glesum, now Gloucester.*
We have" now exhausted the space at our disposal for this
part of our subject, and we fear that in addition we have
exhausted the patience of our readers. We regret that we can-
not notice in detail the views of Cardinal Moran, Lanigan,
Stokes, Todd, Cashel Hoey, Malone, Olden, Barry, Morris,
Bury, Archbishop Healy, and many others ; but we are con-
strained to abstain from controversy.
There are three tests our readers can apply to each sug-
gested birthplace: (1) Were there several thousand adult
Christians with many priests there ? (2) Were there decurions
there ? (3) Would an ordinary voyage from Erin to it take
three days ?
St. Patrick does not tell us how long he was in the islands
of the Tyrrhene Sea.
After a few years (he says) I was again amongst the Britons with
my relatives, who received me as a son, and in all sincerity entreated
me that even now, after such great suflerings as I had endured, I would
* "Roman Britain," Edinburgh Review, vol. 189 (1899), p, 360. See
ftlso Mr. Haverfield's map, and succinct account of Roman Britain in Poole's
" Historical Atlas," plate xv. (1896, etc). The views in both are in substantial
agreement.
152 EAKLY IRISH HISTORY.
never leave them, and there even in the very bosom of the ulght I saw
a man namsd Victoricus coming as it were from Hibernia with
innumerable letters, and he gave me one of them. And I read the
beginning of the letter containing " The voice of the Irish, " and while
I was reading aloud the beginning of the letter, I myself thought,
indeed, in my mind that I heard the voice of those who were near the
wood of Foclat, which is close by the Western Sea. And they cried
out : " We entreat thee, holy youth, that thou come and walk still
{adkuc) amongst us." And I was deeply moved in heart, and could
read no further, and so I awoke.
The words in the text are ad hue anihulas inter nos. The
meaning attached to ad hue here is important. It repre-
sents continuing action in a context like the present, and
means "stili." We suggest that our saint knew the voice of
the children by the wood of Foclat because he heard it before
near Killala in Mayo, where he took ship for France. This
supports the view we have already presented. Victoricus, the
name of the man who came with the letters, was also, as we
have seen, the name of the apostle of the Morini who suffered
a.t Amiens in A.D. 303, and now announced his name to St.
Patrick to support the petition of the children. In the Con-
fession the Saint speaks only of Victoricus once, viz., at this
place. He does not mention Victor at all. In the Armagh
text of Muirchu, Victor is the name given to the angel who
frequently visited the saint. The Brussels text, however, has
both Victoricus and Victor. Victor and Victoricus came to be
regarded as one angel, and from the time of Tirechan Victor
was, according to the tradition of the Church, the Guardian
Angel of our apostle. The Scholiast to Fiacc goes further and
says, what we do not find stated elsewhere, that St. Victor
" was the common angel of the Scottic race. As Michael was
the angel of the race of the Hebrews,^ so Victor was of the
Scots. Hence he took care of them through Patrick."
A more difficult question to answer is who and where were
the Britons amongst whom were the relatives of the saint.
Loth fixes the commencement of the emigration of the Britons
into Brittany between 430 and 440 a.d." ' Le Moyne de la
Broderie fixes the date of the establishment of the immisfrants
'C
« Trip. Life, 415, refers to Daniel, x. 21, xii., J, also p. 425.
» Rev. Celt, sxii. (1901) 84.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 153
at 460 A.D.,8 which corresponds with the date assigned by
Lobinau, 45S A.D.^ These immigrants cannot be the Britons
referred to. There were, however, Britons further north, a
remnant, probably, of the Britanni who passed into Britain,
and have left traces on the Continent from the Elbe to the
Channel. In the time of Pliny they were mentioned as a tribe
of, or at least, as adjacent to, the Morini, and there is still a
hamlet near Etaples called Bretagne.^*'
The editors of the Delphin edition of Pliny say in a note :
" The Britons certainly occupied the territory in which are now
the towns of Etaples, Montreuil, Hesdin, and Ponthieu, to the
river Somme ; and if credit is to be given to the author of
the "Libellus Provinciarum Romanarum " were part of the
Morini." ^^ They were thus placed very close to the Letia (Lys)
the great trade route on which Taruanna was situated. Tho
scholiast on Fiacc represents the saint as going from Ail Cluade
with his father " on a journey to the Britons of Armuire
Letha," i.e., " co Bretnaib Ledach," for there were relatives
of theirs there at that time. The Letia would be adequately
represented in -Gaelic by "Letha." Letavia as a name for
Brittany did not then exist, and there seems to be no reason
why the word should not be applied to the Britons near the
river Letia.^^ The scholiast, after stating that the saint was
born at Ail Cluade, says that he was captured whilst with his
relatives in Armuire Letha, in France.^^ Our view is that he
was born in this territory. The old Roman Breviary describes
him as " genere Brito." The Breviary of Rheims, " In maritimo
Britannise territorio." The Breviary of Rouen, " In Britannia
Gallicana." Now, the only Britannia Gallicana that existed
at the time of his birth was that above mentioned.
The beginning of the fifth century witnessed the birth
of a formidable heresy, all the more dangerous because
• Histoire de Bretagne (1896), t. I. 2t8.
9 Histoire de Bretagne, t. I.-l. I. 1. (1707).
^" Rogetde Belloquet, Ethnogenie Celtique, types Gaulois, p. 79 note (1861).
" Pliny, " Deinde Menapii, Morini (Therouanne), Oromansaci, juncti pago
4ui Gessoriacus (Boulogne), vocatur, Britanni, Ambiani (Amiens), Bellovasci "
(Beauvais), N.H. IV. c. 31. The Britanni occupy, seemingly, a central position
between Therouanne, Boulogne, Amiens and Beauvais.
1- For Letia see Valesius Notitia Galltarum sub voce
w Trip. Life, 413.
154 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
it was intellectual, having its origin in a perplexed and
obscure philosophy. Pelagius, the founder of it, was,
probably, born in Britain, of Scottic parents. St. Augustine,
Orosius, and Prosper call him a " Briton." St. Jerome, without
directly naming him, refers to him as most stupid, weighed
down with Scottic porridge.^* And, again, as follows : —
"And Grunnius (i.e., Rufinus) himself being mute, he barks by
the dog Albinus (i.e., Pelagius), tall and big-boned, whose kick
is worse than his bite, for he has parentage from the Scottic
race from the neighbourhood of the Britons. Like (another)
Cerberus, according to the fables of the poets, he must be struck
down with a spiritual club that he may be silent with an
eternal silence, like his master Pluto {i.e., Rufinus, who was
then dead)." ^^ It is not easy to find out here where the rhetoric
ends and the facts begin. It was fortunate for the Church that
all our saints had not the same command of lansfuasre as that
illustrious scholar. St. Augustine, who knew Pelagius per-
sonally, presents a different estimate, and writes — " Pelagius
whilst staying at Rome was held in great honour, and was
loved by Paulinus of Nola as a servant of God, and I not only
did love him but do love him, though now with a desire that
he may be delivered from sentiments adverse to the grace of
God." The principal errors of the Pelagians were the denial
of the necessity for grace and the denial of the transmission of
sin from the Fall of Adam. It was to refute these views that
1* Stolidissimus et Scottorum pultibus prasgravatus,
^^ Ipseque mutus latrat per Albinum canem, grendem et corpulentum, et qui
calcibu3 ma'2;i3 possit sasvire quam deatibus ; habet enim progeaiem Scoticfe
gentis de Britannorura vicinia ; qui juxta fabulas poetarutn, insfcar Cerberi
spirituali percutiendus est clava, ut Eeterno cum suo magistro Plutone silentio
conticescat. Verum hoc alias. — Migne 24, 758.
Oro3ius says he was a man " largis humeris, crasso collo, et praegrandi
vultu.' ■
Todd misses the vis consiqueniiae here. Life St. Patrick 190. It is
to be found in the allusion to " hoofs " ! (Calcibus) ! The vis comicci ia
ambushed with Attic sparkle in " hoofs."
Its proper pow'r to hurt each creature feals,
Bulls aim their horns, and Asses lift their heels.
'Tis a boar's talent not to kick but hug.
And no man wonders he's not stung by Pug.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 155
St. Augustine wrote many works, commencing with one on
" Forgiveness of Sins and Baptism," in 412 — an important date,
as we shall see hereafter.
This controversy led up a few years later to semi-
Pelagianism, in which Cassian became, or was supposed to be,
involved, owing to some expressions in his 13th Conference,
which are somewhat ambiguous, and may, at the worst, have
represented a passing phase of thought. He was certainly
regarded as orthodox in 430;, as in that year, on an appeal from
Rome, he wrote the De Incarnatione to refute the Nestorians,
and would in all probability have found no difficulty in accept-
ing the doctrine settled at the Council of Orange in 529, which
condemned semi-Pelagianisra, whilst declaring that predesti-
nation to evil was not to be taught.
The semi-Pelagians believed in the doctrine of the fall of
man and acknowledged the necessity of real grace to man's
restoration. They even admitted that this grace must be
" prevenient " to such acts of will as resulted in Christian
good works. But-some of them thought — and herein consisted
the error called semi-Pelagian — that nature unaided could take
the first step towards its recovery by desiring to be healed
through faith in Christ. The denial of the necessity of
initial grace opened a door to Pelagianism, and endangered
the doctrine of the Redemption which lay at the very root of
Christianity. This explanation is necessary to enable our
readers to understand the views we shall present as to the
Confession of St. Patrick, who must have been familiar with
the details of this controversy.
In the third decade of the fifth century the Pelagian move-
menthad spread widely, had developed a particularly dangerous
energy in Wales, and threatened to move Westwards to taint
the beginnings of the faith in Ireland, where the Church was
still in its infancy. The situation was grave, and manifestly
called for energetic action on the part of the ecclesiastical
authorities at Rome. Celestine was then Pope (422-432). Leo
the Great was then Archdeacon. Palladius was then a deacon.
Prosper has the following entry in his Chronicle : —
429 A.D. — Agricola, a Pelagian, the son of Severianus, a Pelagian
bishop, corrupted the British Church by the publication Oi his dogmas ;
but on the action of the deacon Palladius, Pope Coelestine sent
156 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Germanus, the bishop of Auxerre, as his representative ; and, dislodg-
ing the heretics, put the Britons on the straight path of the Catholic
Faitb.^*
Prosper went on a mission to Pope Celestine in 431, and
was afterwards secretary to Leo the Great. The last entry in
his Chronicle is under the date 455. The deacon Palladius,
he tells us further, " was sent to the Scots believingr in
Christ,^^ the first bishop (who was sent)." This entry is under
date 431, the year in which the (Ecumenical Council was held
at Ephesus. We see from these entries that Rome was very
attentive, at that time, to what was passing in the Western
end of the world. According to Constantius, a monk of
Lyons, who wrote a life of Germanus within about 40 years
after his death, Germanus and Lupus were selected at a
synod of the bishops of Gaul, which is not inconsistent with
the statement of Prosper. Constantius adds that the Britons
came in crowds every day to hear the apostolic bishops, and
the divine word was spread abroad, not only in the churches,
but in the streets, in the fields, and in the bye-ways, so that
the Catholics were everywhere confirmed in the faith, and
having been led astray recognised the way of amendment. ^^
From this some writers have very reasonably inferred that
Germanus and Lupus addressed the people in a vernacular
'8 Agricola Pelagianus Severiani episcopi Pelagian! filius, ecclesias Brittaniae
dogmatis sui insinuatione (publication) corrumpit, sed ad insinuationem?
[actionem] Palladii diaconi papa Cselestinus Gernianum Autissiodorensem epis-
copum vice sua mittit et deturbatis hereticis Britannos ad Catholieam fidem
dirigiti
Insinuatio, then, meant putting on the register and publishing.
Mommsen T. Chron. Min. Mon. Germ torn, ix. page 472.
Wilhelm Levison has written an interesting article on " Bischof Germanus
von Auxere," in the 29th vol. of the Neues Arch iv der Gesellsehaft fur iiltere
deutsche Gescbichtskunde — (1903). Referring to Zimmer be observes " Desen
ausfuhrungen bei allem scharfsinn bisweilen durch ein ubermass von hypothesen
beeintrachtigt sind." And of Pflug Harting, who wrote against the authenticity
of the Confession [Neue Heidelberger Jarhbusher iii. 71] he says : " Was Pflug
Hartung gegen die Echteit der Confessio und Epistola vorgebracht hat scheinc
mir nicht genugend zu deren Verwerfung."
" Ad Scotos in Christum credentes ordinatus a papa Celestino Palladiu?
primus episcopus mittitur. — Mommseu. Chron, Min. i. 473.
18 Et cum quotidie irruente frequentia stiparentur divinus sermo non solum
in ecclesiis verum etiam per trivia, per rura, per devia diSundebatur ut passim
et fide Catholici firmarentur et depravati viam correctionis agnoscerent. —
Vita, 19, 23 Stubbs' Cc«C27., p 17.
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK. 157
tongue. This conclusion is warranted, if the testimony of
Constantius on this point can be relied on.
The words of Prosper deserve close examination. Palladius
was sent " to the believers " after the Council at Ephesus had
condemned Pelagius. He was the first bishop sent to them.
Does this mean that he was to be bishop of the Irish, that he
was sent " as their bishop ? " Prosper does not say so, and
we venture to think that this was not likely. That Palladius
should have been sent, not only to the Scots, but to the western
regions infected with the Pelagian heresy, to declare authori-
tatively "a latere," what was decided at the Council and what
were the final views of Rome, is what we should have ex-
pected. His mission, we should say, was primarily to the
clergy. Would Rome have sent him to the U7ibelieving Scots to
convert them ? Would it have sent a missionary to talk to
them in Latin when it had ready to its hand a tried and trusted
man who could talk to the Gaels in Gaelic ?
We shall now lay before our readers the substance of the state-
ments made by Malbrancq, in his history of the Morini, on this
point. The Rev. James Malbrancq was born at St. Omer in 1579,
was received into the Society of Jesus in 1599, and died at Tour-
nay in 1653. " Malbrancq," says M. Denoyers, a high authority
on ecclesiastical antiquities, in an article on the ancient diocese
of Therouanne, " devoted his life to the study of the Morini,
visited the ecclesiastical establishments in the province, and
never fails to indicate the authority of the sources to be con-
sulted." ^^ There existed in his time an ancient muniment
which has since been lost — the Chronicon Morinense — which
contained an abridged narrative of the ecclesiastical events and
the lives of the bishops of the diocese of Therouanne, taken
from the original documents preserved in the archives. It was
kept in the chapter-house of the bishopric of Ypres, to which
it had been carried by the canons of Therouanne, who took
refuge in that town after the destruction of the capital of the
Morini in 1553 by the Emperor Charles the Fifth. Malbrancq
had before him the Life by Probus, and asserts in the 26th
chapter of the De Morinis, that St. Patrick belonged for some
years to the diocese of Therouanne, as " the MSS., and the
" Soctete d'Histoire de France. Annuaire for 1863, p. 627.
158 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Catalogues of the Bishops of this diocese, and the Life of St.
Arnulph, of Soissons, testify." ^^
In the Catalogue of the Bishops — and this is the all-
important fact — he found the name of St. Patrick not included
in the direct line, but inserted at the side in the Catalos-ue "
He was an adlatus, or assistant bishop, and so properly placed
at the side {adlatus), and not in the direct line of the bishops.
" He was not wedded to the Church (of the Morini)," adds
Malbrancq, " since he was already betrothed to the Church
over the Sea (of Erin)." 21
He was placed by Germanus amongst the Morini, because
his assistance was required there at the time, and he could
easily pass over thence to the Irish, when the time was ripe
for missionary action there. A recent writer of great
authority on the Registers of Therouanne, observes — " On the
authority of the Catalogue, the most ancient and authentic,
of the bishops of the Morini, it must be admitted that there
was no duly constituted bishop {titulaire, a technical word)
before Antimond (501 A.D.?) and we cannot regard as suffragans
(a technical word) the holy bishops missionary and regionary
from the third to the sixth century, who evangelized large parts
of this vast country of the Morini. St. Lieven, for instance, landed
there from Ireland, and suffered martyrdom in 647, on his way
to Flanders and Brabant. As to St. Patrick, consecratedbishop
by Pope Celestine a short time before his mission to Ireland in
432, he may have traversed the Morini, and evangelized it on
his way, but it was not with the titulus (title) of suffragan
bishop. See the Dissertation of Malbrancq, De Movinis, I.,
622-624.22
This we have already referred to. The learned Abb6 thus
adopts and corroborates, with some necessary technical
qualitications, the statements of Malbrancq.
2" Patricium quern etsi ut suum suspiciat et vindicefc Hibernia, Morinoa
tamen etiam aliquot annis posse amplecti, et M8S. et Episcoporum hujus
Dioeceseos Catalogi, et S. Aruulphi Sues-ioaeasis vita abunde testaiitur. —
Malbrancq L>e Morinis torn. 1., c. 2Q, pp. 168-171. Tornaei Nerviorum, 1639.
21 Patric.ius ad Morinos quidem accessit episcopus sed non earn sibi despon-
savit ecclesiam, cum transmarina addicta esset in sponsam ; idcirco Catalogi
Episcoporum Morinensium non eum recta mcluduat seriese d ad latus adseiscunt
episcopuin. — Ibid.
2s Bled O., Abb6, — Registeres de3 ev^aues de Thei-ouaQne p. 7, v. 35. (1902).
THE COMING OF ST. PATKICK, 159
It is to this period, thfc exact length of which cannot be
stated, perhaps a year or two only, that, in our opinion
the part of the epistle to Coroticus which is genuine must
be assigned. Coroticus was probably a robber chief over
a predatory people on the border of the Morini who were at
least nominally Christians, and the fellow-citizens (Roman) of
our saint. In one of his forays at Easter time, when the
baptisms took place at that period, he carried off numbers of
the newly-baptised, and our saint appealed, not so much to him,
as to such faith as existed in his lawless fellow-citizens. Most
of the present text of the epistle is, in our opinion, a later
addition. We cannot, however,'pursue the matter further here.'^-^
When Germanus arrived at Boulogne with Lupus in 429
his first thought was to take our apostle with them. But on
considering the matter with Lupus, they decided that he
should remain there for some time longer until the Pelagian
troubles had been disposed of. This is Malbrancq's view which
appears to be very reasonable. We cannot conceive it possible
that the priests at Therouanne would falsify their records by
inserting the name of St. Patrick. The statement in the life
of St. Arnulph, though entitled to some weight, is of secondary
importance, as it probably represents only a tradition.
Malbrancq has it that St. Patrick was consecrated by Pope
Celestine bishop for the Irish, and that his ordination and
mission, in conjunction with the work of Germanus in Britain,
was part of the campaign against Pelagianism in the West. If
his view be right, Palladius was not appointed bishop for the
Irish. There could not be two co-ordinate bishops for one
diocese, and at that time, if we remember rightly, a bishop
could not desert his espoused church, even to become bishop
of Rome itself. Muirchu says Palladius did not wish " to
spend time in a land which was not his own." This, we make
no doubt is quite true. Muirchu says he was sent to convert
the Irish, but being wild and rough they did not easily receive
his teaching, so he crossed the first sea on his way home and
died among the Britons.^*
^ The Patrician Docainents will be the subject of the next chapter.
^ Neque et ipse voluit transigere tempus in terra non sua, sed reversus ad
©um qui misit ilium. Revertente vern eo hinc et primo mari transito coeptoque
terrarum itinere in Britonum iinibus vita functus — Muirchu. Aualec. Boll., I. 553.
Insulam sub Crumali rigore positam. — Trip. Life, II..S., i.'72.
160 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
There can be very little doubt, if his life had been spared,
he would have used his best endeavours to compose matters
there, and the Pelagian trouble might not have broken out
afresh, requiring a second visit from Germanus thirteen years
later.
Malbrancq's views found no acceptance with the Bollandist
editor, Papebroche. He had constructed a wonderful chrono-
taxis — an arrangement of the life by years, giving time and
place for everything. Malbrancq's views did not agree with
that chronotaxis, consequently his views were wrong. The
Catalogue of the bishops was, it was suggested, suppositious;
and the life of Arnulph, according to the copy in his posses-
sion, said nothing^ about St. Patrick. But there was a life a
few miles ofl' at Ypres that did so refer to St. Patrick, and the
Catalogue of the bishops was there for all men to see; and
Malbrancq, who published the De Morinis in 1629, was alive,
at Tournay, within easy reach of Antwerp, where the publica-
tion of the ^cfa Sanctoi^um commenced in 1643, and he lived
for ten years longer. Papebroche playfully suggests that in
his anxiety to exalt the name of his native land he disregarded
the lawful claims of his neighbours. Surely then was the
time to bring him to trial and compel him to prove his inno-
cence. Papebroche forebore from doing so. He adds, how-
ever, in mitigation of Malbrancq's lapse from virtue : " If
Malbrancq had read my chronotaxis he would have omitted
his twenty-sixth chapter."-^ We are of opinion that the
perusal of that Wahres Curiosum would have had no such
result.
Further, we submit that St. Patrick is the unnamed bishop
referred to in the following extract from Prosper, which is
found in the " Contra Collatorem," a treatise written by
Prosper against the semi-Pelagianism imputed to Cassian.
Wherefore also the Pontiff Celestine (+ Ap. 28th, 432), of vener-
able memory, commanded Celestius (a disciple of Pelagius)to be driven
from the borders of all Italy . . .. and with no less zealous care
he delivered the Brittaiiias from the same disease, when he drove from
that secluded place on the Ocean some enemies of grace who were settling
25 Acta SS. viii., 526 (Ed. 1865).
THE COMING OF ST. PATRICK, 161
in the soil of their origin, and by ordaining a bishop for the Scots,
whilst he laboured to keep the Roman Island Catholic, made also the
barbarous island Cliristian.^'^
This work consists of an examination of the 13th Collation
of Cassian, a discourse of the Abbot Chaeromon on the Protec-
tion of God. At the conclusion Prosper expresses a hope that
the doctrines therein may be condemned by Pope Sixtus (4;>2-
440) as they had been condemned by Celestine, his predecessor.
From this it is clear that it was written after the death of
Pope Celestine and during the Pontificate of Sixtus, i.e.,
between 432 and 440, and there is nothing except conjecture
to fix on any particular year within these limits.
Prosper says it is twenty years and more (et amplius) since
the fio-ht besran, that is since 412, when St. Augustine
published the " De Peccatorum Mentis " his first anti-Pelagian
treatise. On this ground Holder, Egger, and Hacuck suggest
433 or 434 as the date of publication of Prosper's Contra Col-
latorem, ^ whilst Zimmer says 437. If the bishop ordained was
Palladius, Prosper would have named him as he did on two
other occasions in his Chronicon. If Palladius was sent to
convert the unbelieving Irish, he failed, and Prosper would not
have ventured to make a statement notoriously contrary to the
facts, which was certain to be challenged at once by vigilant
adversaries. The statement, moreover, it should be added, is
found in the 21st chapter, inserted apparently at the last
moment, as the work is summarised, and virtually concluded,
in the 19th.-^ Before this the news of the conversion of
Laeghaire had reached Prosper.
The bishop then who was sent " to the Scots " (ad Scotos) is
different from the bishop sent " for the Scots " (Scotis)and the
^ Code et -venerabilis memoriffi Poiitifex Celestinus Ccelestium totius
Italise finibus jussit extrudi nee vero segniori cura ab hoc eodem morbo Brit-
tanias liberavit, quando quosdam inimicos gratia;, solum suae originis occupantes,
etiain ab illo secreto exclusit Oceatii ; et ordinato Scotis episcopo, dum
Roraanam insulam studet servare Catholicam fecit etiain barbaram Christianam.
—Prosper Tiro. " Contra Collatorem." — Migae, Tom. 51, p. 271.
^ The Collatio was a conference or discourse on spiritual matters amone;st
religious by way of question and answer, " by which method doubts were
dispelled and truth made clear." — Migne 51, p. 573,
28 Neucs Archiv. (Eerier). Real. Encyclopedie ^Hacuck).
Celtic Church (Zimmer).
162 EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
latter was none other than St. Patrick. Palladius was sent to
the "believers," St. Patrick mainly for the "unbelievers."
Some writers have considered that the effect of the evi-
dence we have adduced as to the Roman Mission is greatly
weakened if not outweighed by the fact that no mention is
made of it in the Confession. This arises, in our judgment,
from an incomplete understanding of its object and scope. It
is not and does not profess to be a biography. The continued
thread of the narrative is not in externals. These are dis-
jointed, unconnected, and incomplete, suggesting throughout
that something must have been lost or omitted. And so we are
not surprised to find, as we shall see in our next chapter, that
attempts were made at an early period to supply in some
measure these supposed omissions, and additions were made
to the original text which is to be found, we think, in the
Book of Armagh and nowhere else. The Confession is in
truth a profession and a testimony — a profession of faith in
the necessity for grace from the very beginning to the very
end of life ; and a testimony borne after a long and chequered
career to its supernatural efficacy. It is primarily 4. record of
inward experiences^ and^ for its length, the most profoundly
spiritual writing in the literature of the Church after the time
of St. Paul. External events, giving time and place, are used
merely as a framework in which are set the inward occurrences
" The Lord," he says, " took care of me, before I knew Him
and before I had wisdom. Wherefore I cannot, and it is not
expedient that I should, keep silent as to the favours which
were so many and the grace which was so great (tanta beneficia
et tantam gratiam), which He vouchsafed to bestow on me in
the land of my captivity." And then he had the vision in the
night time and took flight and left the man with whom he
had been for six years, and " he went in the strength of the
Lord, who directed his way for good." And so when men
and dogs were starving in the wilderness he lifted up his voice
in prayer, and his prayer was heard by the God of love, who
fed His prophet from the mouths of the ravens, and con-
veyed unseen supplies to the widow's cruse. And, again, in
the night time he was seized by evil spirits, and he cried for
mercy to the God of Pity, and the sun burst forth, and the evil
spirits wer^l shased back, into the darkness. So after many
THE COMTNG OF ST, PATRICK. 163
yf^.irs he wont again among his own people, and he wavered,
perhaps, between a life of contemplative and easy piety on
the one hand, and the strenuous and perilous life of " a
servant laborious and serviceable to Christ " on the other.
Victorious then came to him with the letter beginning " The
voice of the Irish," and he thought he heard voices which he
recognised from the Wood of Foclat appealing to him to walk
still amongst them. He did not accept this vision as a com-
mand, but as a grace — as a call to sacrifice, but as a sure sign
and token of God's benediction upon him ; and he concludes
with the ever memorable words, " I beg that no one may
ever say if I have ever done or proved the truth of anything
successfully [secundum ? ] however little, that I, ignorant as I
am, have done it. But judge ye, and let it be believed most
truly, that it was the grace of God. And this is my confession
before I die. "29
The interest in this text is mainly spiritual. The canvas
is otherwise tame enough. There is little light and shade.
It lacks the deceptive charm of contrasted colours. The
world loves the story of the prodigal son, and is anxious in
particular to have a minute and detailed account of his doings
while he was prodigal. This interest is happily absent from
the life of our apostle. Pornographic perfumes have at all
times a >iickening odour, even when employed for pious uses.
Saints with a past are manifestations of God's mercy ; saints
without a past are manifestations of His grace. Our apostle
was a child of grace, and his confession is inspired throughout
with its holy influence. He did not, it is true, formulate prin-
ciples or define and lay down doctrines. His was the practical
wisdom to know when mysteries should be left mysterious.
He did not regard grace as an unseen force to be distributed
in volts or measured by foot-pounds. Grace was to him as m
whispering wind, blowing softly on the withered foliage of the
soul, and filling the leaves again with the freshness and the
beauty of the spring time.
^ Precor . . ut nemo unquam dicat quod mea ignorentia si aliquid pusil-
Inm egi vol demonstaverim secundum ; sed arbitramini et verissime credatur
quod donum Dei fuisset. Et hsec est confessio mea antequam morior.
[ 1C4 ]
CHAPTER XL
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS.
THE Confession deals ver}^ briefly with what happened after
the arrival of our Apostle in Erin. Our readers will be
glad to have the narrative as nearly in his own words as
oar translation can make it. We also give the Latin text, as the
ipsissima verba of the Saint are of the highest importance : —
[Translation.]
But it would be long (he says) to relate all my labour in details, or
even in part. Briefly, I may say, that the most pitiful (piissimus)
God often rescued me from being enslaved, and from twelve perils by
which my life was endangered, besides many snares, and things that I
cannot find words to express ; nor will I try the patience of my readers.
But God is my Creator, who knows all things before they come to pass.
For I am greatly indebted to God, who has given me such grace that
many peoples (ruAr^) should be born again to God through me, and
that everywhere clergy should be ordained for people newly coming to
the faith, whom the Lord took to himself (sumpsit) from the ends of
the earth, as He had promised by His prophets — " To thee the heathen
will come and say, our fathers made false idols, and there is no profit
in them." . . .
Whence, then, has it come to pass that in Ireland they who never
had any knowledge of God, but always hitherto worshipped idols ^ and
unclean things have lately become a people of the Lord and are called
Sons of God. The sons and daughters of the Scottic chieftains are seen
to be monks and virgins of Christ (Filii Scotorum et filise regulorum
monachi et virgines Christi videntur)
I call God to witness, on my soul, that I do not lie, neither [do I
write] that there may be an importunity (occasio) on you, nor do I
hope for honour from any man, for honour that is not yet seen but that
the heart believes in sufficeth ; but I see now that I am exalted by
the Loi'd above measure in this world, and I am not worthy nor such
that He should bestow this upon me, for I know that poverty and
suffering are more becoming than riches and luxury. For Christ the
Lord was poor for us. Now I, poor and miserable, even though I should
wish for riches, have them not, neither do I judge myself in that I daily
anticipate being murdered or trapped or reduced to slavei*y, or some
misfortune overtaking me.
^ The idols here referred to were not aiithroponiorpbie, but representations
of the sua and moon, etc., as we sliall show in the nest chapter.
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS. 165
Now I beg of those who believe and fear God, whosoever shall
deign to look into and receive this writing which Patrick the sinner
and unlearned truly has written in Ireland that no one may ever say
if I have done or proved the truth of anything successfully
(secundum)^ however little that I, ignorant as I am, have done it. But
judge ye and let it be believed most truly that it was the grace of God
(donum Dei), And this is my Confession before I die.
[Colophon.]
Thus far tlie book that Patrick wrote with his own hand.
On the I7th day of March Patrick was translated to heaven.
Longum est hautem totum per singula enarrare laborem meum vel
per partes. Breviter dicam qualiter piisimus Deus de servitute saepe
(me) liberavit et de periculis duodecim quibus periclitata est anima mea
praeter insidias multas et quae verbis exprimere non valeo, nee injuriam,
legentibus, faciam. Sed Deum auctorem (habeo) qui novit omnia
etiam anteq\iam fiant quia valde debitor sum Deo qui mihi tantam
gratiam donavit ut populi multi per me in Deum renascerentur et ut
clerici ubique illis ordinarentur ad plebem nuper venientem ad
credulitatem quam sumpsit Dominus ab extremis terrse sicut olim
promiserat per prophetas sues "Ad te gentes venient et dicent falsa
comparaverunt patres nostri idola et non est in eis utilitas.
Unde autem Hiberione qui nunquani notitiam Dei habuerunt nisi
idola et immunda usque semper coluerunt quo modo nuper facta est
plebs Domini et filii Dei nuncupantur. Filii Scotorum et filise regu-
lorum monachi et virgines Christi esse videntur. . .
Ecce testem Deum invoco in animam meam quia non mentior,
neque ut sit occasio vobis neque ut honorem spero ab aliquo viro.
Sufficit enim honor qui nondum videtur sed corde creditur. Sed video
jam in pra3senti sseculo me supra modum, exaltatum a Domino. Et non
eram dignus neque talis ut hoc mihi praestaret ; dum scio melius
convenit paupertas et calamitas quam divitise et delici?e. Sed et
Christus Dominus pauper fuit pro nobis. Ego vei'O miser et iufelix
etsi opes voluero jam non habeo neque me ipsum judico quia quotidie
spero aut internecionem aut circumveniri aut redigi in servitutem sive
occasio cujuslibet (fieri).
Sed precor credentibus et timentibus Deum quicunque dignatus
fuerit inspicere vel recipere banc scripturam quam Patricius peccator
indoctus scilicet Hiberione conscripsit ut nemo unquam dicat quod mea
ignorantia si aliquid pusillum egi vel demonstraverim secundum, sed
arbitramini et piissime credatur quod donum Dei fuisset. Et hsec est
confessio mea antequam niorior.'
[The Colophon follows.]
Hucusque volumen quod Patricius manu conscripsit sua. Septima
decima Martii die translatus est Patricius ad ccelos.
2 Secundum is used adverbially. Wliilo his " om Dei placitum A with z in
margin." The Armagh text in the facsimile MS. and the Rolls series does not
contain Deiplacitum.
^ A facsimile of the Armagh text is given by Gilbert, Part II. Appendix
III., which it is useful to refer to.
166 EAELY IRISH HISTORY.
The Colophon is in the same handwriting as the rest of
the text and as the heading, which was written, as we shall
see, by Ferdomnach, and is continuous with it. It is
difficult to say whether it originated with him or whether
he found it in a text from which he copied it, The heading,
which is in these words, "Incipiunt Libri Sancti Patricii
Episcopi " [Here begin the Books of St. Patrick, bishop], seems
to indicate that there were two Books before him in one
" binding," not using the word binding in the modern sense.
The word Liber, as the word Book in mediceval times, was
applied to what we should now term a tract or a pamphlet as
well as to a " volume," The " Books " here mentioned were,
no doubt, those mentioned in the Tripartite Life and elsewhere
—the Confession and the Epistle now usually called the Epistle
to Coroticus. In the Cotton and Fell (2) MSS. the Epistle is
introduced merely with the words " Explicit Liber primus
incipit secundus." [The first Book ends ("' e., the Confessio).
the second Book begins (i-e., the Epistle to Coroticus). ] Now
the Epistle to Coroticus is not copied into the Book of Armagh,
but it would be straining the effect and import of the Colophon
too far to assume that it was omitted because it was not in
the handwriting of the saint. Why, then, was it omitted \
Ferdomnach's work, as we shall see, was done under the
supervision and direction of Torbach, the successor of the
saint in the See of Armagh. Its omission was thus the
deliberate act of the Irish Church as represented by its
head, and not merely the individual choice of the learned
scribe. We think it was omitted because the text before them
was not, in their opinion, genuine. We cannot for one moment
believe that the text of the Epistle was not before them, or
that, having it before them, and believing it to be the genuine
script of the saint, or a genuine copy thereof, they would have
omitted or neglected to have it inscribed. The Bollandists
took their copy from a codex in the Monastery of St. Vedast,
at Noialle, near Arras. They state that it was joined
on to the Confession in the Cordex without any distinc-
tive title. This want they supplied, and placed at the head
of the Epistle the title, "Epistle of St. Patrick to the
Christian subjects of Coroticus." They observe that this
Epistle was not written to Coroticus himself, but refers to
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS 167
another letter written and sent to be delivered to him, which
was lost.*
The followin;:: passage in the Epistle to Coroticus appears
to be an extract from that letter : —
It is the custom of the Rom.an and Gallic Christians to send holy
and suitable men to the Franks and to the other nations with so many
thousands of solidi (say 8/- each) to redeem baptised captives ; you
(i.e., Coroticus) so often slay thein, and sell them to a foreign nation
that knows not God. You deliver members of Christ as it were into a
brothel {quasi in Iwpanar tradis membra Chrisii). What hope have
you in God, or he who is of one mind with you, or becomes a partner
with you by words of courtly approbation ? (Qui te communicat verbis
adulationi.^'.)
This, it will be observed, is addressed directly to Coroticus.
The genuine letter, which we call letter to distinguish it
from the Epistle, as the Bollandists state, is lost.
We pause here to ask : is this language applicable to the
supposed Coroticus, of Alclyde, or to Kerdigan, the son of
Cynedda ? Stokes observes on this : —
The passasje proves that it (i.e., the letter) must have been written
while the Franks were Pagans, i.e., before A.D. 496, and before they
had crossed the Rhine and settled in Gaul, i.e., before 428 A.D.*
If the latter date could be approximately fixed, say, before
482, with certainty, it would be most important ; but we have
made no independent investigation on this point.
The Epistle states, apparently in reference to the genuine
letter and an extract from it : —
With my own hand I (i.e., the saint), have written and composed
these words and handed them to the soldiers (militibus the Roman
soldiers) to be sent for the fellow-citizens of Coroticus. I will not say
my fellow-citi;',ens and the fellow-citizens of the Roman saints, but of
demons, on account of their evil deeds . . . allies of the Scots and
apostate Picts, who are bloody (sanguilentos sanguinai'e ?) with the
* EoU. Acta SS, 17th March, vol. XI.. 534 (Ed. 1S6S). We are not aware
\»hethcr there are an Explicit aud Incipit in the Vedast M.S. If so, they are not
given.
Professor Bury thinks " the scribe was hurried, and that in writing the
Confession he 'scamped' his -worli ior tlie same reason which impelieu him
to omit copying the Letter." — " Life of Patrick ! " p. 227.
^ Trip. Life, Introduction p. 1, c. 1, referrmg to Ferguson Patrician Docu-
tneuts 101.
168 EARLY IRISH HISTORT.
blood of the innocent Christians whom I have begotten inmimerably to
God, and confirmed in Christ.® (i.e., gave them the Holy Eucharist).
The Epistle continues : —
On the day after they were anointed neophytes while (the chrism)
was shining on their foreheads they were cruelly slain by the above-
mentioned, and I sent a letter by a holy priest whom I had taught
from infancy, with clerics, asking as a favour that they might grant us
some of the plunder, or of the baptized captives they have taken, but
they laughed at them.
The neophytes at that time were usually baptized together
in numbers at Easter, anointed with chrism on the forehead,
and clothed with white garments. This letter, as well as the
letter to Coroticus, has been lost. We now come to the appeal
to the Christian fellow-citizens ol Coroticus. The Epistle
says : —
I, therefore, earnestly beseech (you), who are holy and humble in
heart, not to court the favour of (adulari), such persons (i.e., the raiders),
nor to take food or drink with them, nor to take their alms, until they
rigorously do penance with tears. I earnestly entreat every servant of
God as he has been eager in the past to be now the bearer of this
letter, and that it be not withheld from anyone, but rather read before
all the people, even in the presence of Coroticus.'
This clearly implies that the letter was to be read before
people who understood Latin — who were the Roman fellow-
citizens of the robbers, under the command of the robber chief,
Coroticus. Would the people at Alclyde understand it ?
Outside the Epistle, Coroticus is an " etymological " per-
sonacre. There is a fable of a conflict of St, Patrick with a
"O'
^ Manu mea scripsi atque condidi verba ista dancia ct traueu.Ia militibus
mittenda Corotoci non dico civibus meis atque civibiis sanctorum Bouaanorum
sed civibus demoniorum ob mala opera ipsorum {riiu host Hi in morte vivuni P)
Socii Scotorum et Pictorum apostatarum.
White gives neque instead of atque, atque is, we hold, the true reading.
We understand " civil " here to mean fellow-citizens. " The robbers by
order of Coroticus" are nowhere called subjects (subditi) nor is he called King
or Prince. The words " invidet inimicus per tirannidem Coroticus " mean b)'
the tyranny or cruelty of Coroticus, and do not imply that he was a tyranuus
or ruler.
liint'.merum, innumerably. The adjective is used adverbially like " verum "
and "aecuudum." The text is corrupt here; we have not attempted to trans-
iate it. Confirmed is technical, and means here gave them the Holy Eucharist.
' Quneso plurimum ut quicunque famulus Dei ut promptus fuerit ut sit genih!"?
litterarura harum ut nequaquara snbtrahatur sed magis potius legatiir coram
cunctis plebibus et presente ipso Corotico.
THE pat]ik;ian documents. 169
certain Coirthech (supposed by some to be Coroticus), King of
Aloo, supposed to be Alclyde. It is found in the Brussels
Codex, but not in the book of Armagh. The saint, for grave
reasons, and under circumstances we cannot detail here, turned
this monarch into a little fox (vulpecula.) ! ^
The alternative Coroticus is Kerdigan, the son of Cynedda,
the eponymus of Cardiganshire. It would require the genius
of Moliere to describe adequately the linguistic transformation
by which Kerdigan became Coroticus.
As regards St. Patrick, there is a certain parallelism
between the Epistle and the Confession. The compiler of the
patchwork epistle had the text of the Confession before him,
and we judge that the parallelism is due to imitation on the
part of a compiler and copyist. The language which he puts
into the mouth of the saint is partly untrue, partly incredible,
ind generally out of keeping with his character. For instance,
the saint is made to say — " To them it is a disgrace that
we have been born in Ireland." The idea belongs to a later
century, when the Sect of the Scots was " Eliminated," and
the explanation offered for this untruth — viz., that he
identifies himself with his converts, is not satisfactory. The
saint would never have said that he tvas born in Erin. Again,
" I was free born. According to the flesh, I was born to a
father who was a decurio.^ For I sold my nobility for the
good of others (I do not blush for that, or regret it.) In fine,
I am a servant in Christ (given over) to a foreign nation, etc.,
etc, . . And if my own friends do not acknowledge me, a
prophet hath no honour in his own country." But his friends
pressed him to stay with them, as he tells us in the Confession ;
and he would not describe the office of decurio, which men
fled to escape from, as " nobility," nor speak of selling or
bartering it. His conception of his mission was spiritual, and
not contractual, and very far removed indeed from the juristic
formala of Do ut Des.
' The fable is to be found conveniently in Trip. Life, 498.
The Brussels MS. has " vel fecule," Probus vnlpecula, Stokes. Trip. Life
(2i8) says i^i^ucc fimiAic.
^ Decurione patre nascor. " Diaconus " is the word in the Conk^ssioa
instead of " Decurio." With contraction both words would be nearly alike.
Wliether contracted or not the word would probably bo failed and partly
illegible by the time of Ferdomnach. Tho context in the CoufeiSion sho.vs
clearly that Decurio is right.
170 •RARLY IRISH HISTORY.
We cannot, however, pursue this matter further, and must
refer our readers to the Epistle itself. We have already said
that there was probably a Letter to Coroticus, written while
the saint was assistant-bishop among the Morini, and we see
no reason to dissent from the judgment of the early Church in
excluding the existing script from their Canon of Patrician
documents.
We do not propose here to give details as to the missionary
labours of our apostle. Our readers will find an exhaustive
account of the legends and traditions respecting them in the
recently published work of Archbishop Healy, The reliable
traditions of the Church concerning them will be found in the
" Selections " of Muirchu, cautiously supplemented from the
Tirechan text, the Liber Angueli and the " Additamenta " (a
further " selection " which we may assign to Ferdomnach.) ^'^
These, with the Confession and Dicta Fatricii, constitute the
Dociiinenta Patriciana in the Book of Armagh. This is a
small vellum quarto, now in Trinity college, Dublin, 7| inches
in height, 5f in breadth, 2^ in thickness. It now contains 221
leaves. The first leaf of the Book is missing, but is supplied
from a MS. that was formerly in the " Scots Cloister " in
Wurzburg-on-the-Main, in Bavaria, where there is a cathedral
dedicated to St. Killian, and which MS. is now in the Royal
Library at Brussels. The writing is generally in double
columns (rarely in three), and all appears to be in the hand of
the same scribe, Ferdomnach, who invites the reader to pray
for him, Pro Ferdomnacho ores, a request which his invalu-
able labour entitles him to have duteously performed by his
countrymen. The Rev. Charles Graves, afterwards Bishop of
Limerick, " by a most recondite and elegant demonstration,"
established that the writer's name was Ferdomnach, who
finished the Gospel, according to St. Matthew, on the 20oh of
September, as a note at folio 36 testifies. Another note at
folio 52 states that Ferdomnach wrote the book, " dictante "
Torbach, the Co-arb of St. Patrick. Torbach died in 807,
having held the See of Armagh for only one year. Ferdom-
nach died in 845.
The plan of our work does not allow us to enter into
" See Hogati, s. 2, " Ann. Boll ," Vol. ii., 213.
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS. 171
particulars in matters of this kind ; but the service rendered by
Bishop Graves, in fixing the date of the Book of Armagh, is
so valuable that we must make an exception. We owe it to him
to give, and we are sure our readers will receive with grateful
pleasure, a brief exposition of some details. According to
Gaelic usage, the name of the scribe was written in the Book
of Armagh in not less than eight places — viz., at the end of
the Confession, of Matthew, Mark, Luke, the Apocalypse,
Acts, Life of St. Martin, and Epistles of Sulpicius Severus to
Eusebius. These entries, however, except that at the end of
St. Martin, had been erased and were undecipherable. The
entry at the end of St. Martin's Life was, with great difficulty,
ascertained to be Pro Ferdomnacho ores. No motive, as far
as we can discover, can be assigned for these erasures, unless
they were made to make it appear from the Colophon at the
end of the Confession, " Thus far, the Book which Patrick
wrote with his own hand," that the codex (or most of it) was
written by the Saint himself, which Edward Lluydd states, was
the commonly received belief in his time^ Now there were
two Ferdomnachs, both scribes. One died in 727, the other in
845. The latter is described by the Four Masters as a man of
knowledge and a choice scribe of Ardmacha (844 A.D.
]:ex\t\X)orhnAC ex\5nAfo i \'C\\\t>wi) co5^i"6e A^.va XYlAdA "o6ce)
The penmanship of the Book of Armagh is of the most consummate
excellence. The whole of the writing is remarkable for its distinctness
and uniformity. All the letters are elegantly shaped, and many of the
initials are executed with great artistic skill. The last verses of St.
John's Gospel (fol. 103a) may be especially referred to, as exhibiting
a specimen of penmanship which no scrivener of the present day could
attempt to rival."
The erasure at the end of St. Matthew (fol. 52b) enabled
the learned bishop to decide that the second Ferdomnach was
the scribe whose name appeared in the Book. It consisted of
four short lines in a semi-Greek character, the writing in
which was partly revived by the use of a weak solution of
gallic acid in spirits of wine. It read as follows :•— •
* * * ach hunc
* ♦ * ni^-**e dictante
* * * ach herede Pat
ricii scripsit.
" Bi.shop iJi-^ves, Proc, Ry. Ir. Ac, iii., 324, Paper read Nov. 9th, 1846.
172 EARLY IRISH HfSTORT.
Dr. Graves found that the bishop referred to was Torbach,
who sat for one year, according to the Catalogues of the Psalter
of Cashel, given by Colgan, and the Leabhar Breac, and who
died on the 16th of July, 807. He restored the text thus : —
TEXT RESTORED. TRAXSLATED.
F domnach hunc Lib Ferdomnach this Book
E rum ***e dictante . . . e dictating
R Torbach herede Pat Torbach, successor of
ricii scripsit ^ Patrick, wrote
He did not restore the three letters before the " E." We
suggest that "ipse" was the word, and translate: "Ferdom-
nach this book himself, Torbach, co-arb of Patrick directing,
wrote." Ferdomnach ipse scripsit is a Gaelicism we have
noted elsewhere='peAt\t)orhnAC if efiDe no fciMoG. It must be
remembered that the documents copied into the Book, at least
the Patrician documents, were ancient texts, partly illegible
from age at the date of the Book.
The date of the Book of Armagh turns on the meaninsf to
be attached to the word " dictante." If it means " at the
dictation of" Torbach, as some will have it, the Book must
have been written in the lifetime of that bishop, not later than
807. If dictante means " by the order of " Torbach, as others
construe it, then the Book may have been written at any time
during the life of Ferdomnach, who died in 845. We think
that the true meaning of " dictante " here and in similarcontexts
is " planning and superintending the work," and that the first
part of the Book, at any rate, in which the " Patrician Docu-
ments " are found, was written during the lifetime of Bishop
Torbach, who was himself an eminent scribe.^^ About that
time the co-arbs of Armagh caused a diligent search to be made
for everything that could be ascertained about the saint.
" Here begin," says Ferdomnach in the Additamenta, " a few
things in addition to be narrated in their proper places which
^-Coarb (CAtTiAfibA) = Coheres, i.e , joint heir with Patrick. The Roman
jurists had not reached the legal conception of a corporation Sole, and the
Donations to the Church of E-oiue were always to St. Peter, the reigning Pope,
and his successor, who were co-heirs with St. Peter. This mav be the origin of
it.
'^ Dictare operam tiigniiicare videtur pracsse operariis, iisque normam
tra tere, atnue ordiaeiu strucLionis. Uucauge, sub voce.
THE patricmn documents. 173
have been discovered in later times by the research (curiosi-
tate) and zeal of holiness [diligentia sanctitatis] of the coarbs,
which are collected, etc., to the honour and praise of the Lord,
and in loving memory of Patrick, even to the present day."^*
The importance of this statement cannot be overrated. It
proves what, indeed, there is sufficient evidence to establish
independently, that the documents inserted in the Book of
Armagh were carefully selected after a diligent search by the
early church. And, in our judgment, nothing not found in
the Book of Armagh should be allowed " canonicity " in rela-
tion to his life.
The Patrician Documents were contained in the codex
[folios 1-24, b. 1] in the following order: — (1) Muirchu's
Selections ; (2) Dicta Patricii ; (3) Tirechan's Text ; (4) Ad-
ditamenta, i.e. Selections in the hand of Ferdomnach, and
probably made by him ; (5) The Index Hibernicus, in Fer-
domnach's smallest hand, which contains notes or catchwords,
which represent to some extent (Stokes says in the main)
" that portion of the Tripartite Life, which is not embraced in
Muirchu's memoir, and Tirechan's notes " ; ^^ (6) Muirchu's
Preface and the Table of Contents [out of place] of Part I. of
his Selections ; (7) The Liber Angueli ; (8) The Confession.
The correspondence between the Index Hibernicus and the
Tripartite, which Stokes points out, is very important. It
brings such parts of the latter as are clearly referred to — very
close to, if not within — the canon of tradition, which the church
thought worthy of preserving after a selective process of
criticism. This canon of tradition should be received with
great respect, but yet not as an inspired word. It must be
subjected to the tests usually applied to evidence of this class,
and patiently sifted to ascertain, as far as possible, the elements
of historical truth it contains.
Muirchu wrote under the superintendence and direction of
Aedh, bishop of Sletty.^^ His preface indicates the nature of
" [Additamenta ad Collectanea Tirechani], Incipinnt alia pauca seroitinis
temporibus inventa suisque locis narranda curiositate heredum diligentiaque
sauctitatis, quae ia honorem et laudem Domini atque in amabilem Patricii
memoiiam usque in hodiernum diem congregantur.
" Tliese additions seem gathered by Ferdomnach, the scribe of ' The Book
of Armagh,' from other ancient Lives of St. Patrick." — Trip. Life, 23i. Stokes.
15 Trip. Life. 348.
"■^ Dictaate Aeduo Slebtieasis civitatis episcopo. ( + 6D8).
174 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
tho work he perfo-rmed. We give the text in p'\rt and a
translation of it tfo which we invite particular attention, as
much turns on its correctness. It differs altogether, as will be
perceived, from that usually accepted.
Since many, my lord Aidus, have essayed to arrange a narrative and
that (utique istam, a Gfelicism) according to what their fathers and
those who were Ministers of the Word from the beginning related to
them, but owing to the great difficulty of the task of arranging a
narrative and divergent opinions and very various views of very many
persons, have never reached one sure tract of history.
Quoniam quidem, mi domine Aido, multi conati sunt ordinare
narrationem utique istam secundum quod patres eorum et qui ministri
initio fuerunt sermonis tradiderunt illis, sed propter difficilHmum nar
rationis opus, diversasque opiniones et plurimorum plurimas suspiciones
nunquam ad unum certumque historiae tramitem pervenerunt.
But not to appear to make a small matter into a big affair, in
obedience to the command of Your Holiness and episcojyal authority, I
too, shall undertake to tell, piece hy piece., selectively (carptim) and tvith
dlfjicnlty, a few of the many incidents in the life of St. Patrick which
have been set forth with little skill from texts of uncertain authorship,
toith frail recollection and obscure meaning, hut with the most dutiful
affection of love.
Sed ne magnum de parvo videar fingere pauca haec de multis
Sancti Patricii gestis parva peritia incertis auctoribus, memoria labili,
attrito sensu, vili sermone, sed affectu piissimo caritatis, etiam sancti-
tatis tuae et auctoritatis imperio obediens carptim gravatimque explicare
aggrediar.
The part in italics is thus translated by Todd : —
But lest I should seem to make a small matter great with little
skill from uncertain autliors with frail memory, with obliterated
meaning, and barbarous language, but with a most pious intention,
obeying the command of thy belovedness and sanctity and authority, I
will now attempt, out of many acts of St. Patrick, to explain these
gathered here and there with difficulty.
Barry translates thus :—
But lest 1 should seem to make much of little I shall undertake to
tell briefly and gravely these few from among the many deeds of St.
Patrick, with slender skill, doubtful authors, forgetful memory, obscure
text and mean speech, but with most loving affection in obedience to
the behest of your Holiness and authority."
" Barry, Prologue by Muirchu, xv.
Bury has an interesting article in Hermathena (xxviii., 172) on the tradi-
tion of Muirchu's text. Ho says (p. 206), as regards the place whore Pallauius
died. " We may, therefore, I think, conjecture with much probabihty that
Muirchu wrote BritoHum {i.e., in riaibus Britonum). This is the word in the
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMV.NTS. 175
Certaii-Jy if all this refers to Mviirchu, the Bishop of Sletty
and the Irish Church were most unfortunate in their selection
of an eminent scribe. We are clearly of opinion that Muirchu
refers not to himself, but to other writers who had previously
dealt with the subject.
The Tirechan text merits and requires very careful con-
sideration. It is a piece of literary joinery fortunately so
clumsily put together that it can be taken to pieces without
much difficulty. This task has been performed by Professor
Bury in a valuable article, to which we acknowledge our in-
debtedness, though we do not entirely concur in his views.
The work has no title.^^ The opening sentence : — " Tirechan,
bishop, wrote these from the lips and from the Book of Ultan,
bishop, whose alumnus and disciple he was," is merely a
heading by a scribe.^^ In any case it is proved to be inaccu-
rate by the subsequent narratives. The residue of the script
is divisible into two parts. The first consists of two books
stated to have been put together (peractus) in the regions of
Meath, Connact, and Ulster, which deal mainly with the con-
ferring of Holy Orders, the foundation of churches, and the
circumstances connected with such foundations. There is
also mention of a visit to Leinster, and the last event recorded
is the baptism of the sons of Natfraich in Munster on the rock
of Patrick in Cashel [et baptizavit filios Nioth FruiGh,[i.e.,
Aengus and his brother] i tir Murtiae super petram Goit/irigi
hi Gaissiul.] The object of this visitation by Tirechan, of
whom nothing is known, save that he was the disciple of Ultan
(t656), is revealed in the following passage at the commence-
ment of Book IL, which we present to our readers, reserving
Armagh Text. The other reading ia " in finibus Piotorum.)^ He returns to
Muiichu in the EngUsh Historical Review (903 p. xix., 493), and refers to
" Misit Germanus seniorem cum illo, hoc est Segetium prespiterum ut tosteia
comitem, haberet quia nee adhuc a sancto domino Germano in PontificaH gradu
ordinatus est" (Trip. Life, 272), as implying that the Saint was subsequently
consecrated by Germanus. We think the impUcation should be that not having
been already consecrated he went to Rome for consecration.
"Etiam sanctitatis " so Stokes and Todd. Hogan omits " etiam,"
observing *' Codex babet * et sanctitatis.' sed particula ' et ' deleta puncto supra
posito." — Ann. Boll., \i., 546.
The punctum, perhaps, should have been the mark of a contraction. The
text appears to require " etiam ; " it is certainly better for it.
18 E. H. Rev.,idx., 235, 700, see also Proc, Ry., Jr. Ac. xxiv., 163.
" Muirchu might have selected the collection ascribed to Bishop Tirechan as
an illustration of the texts described in hia preface. If so, he was well advised.
17G early IRISH HISTORY.
observations upon it till we come to consider the organisation
of the early Irish church : —
All that I have written, from the beginning of this book (you
know, because they were done in your parts) I heard from many elders
and from Ultan, Bishop of the Dal Conchubar (a tribe of the O'Connors
in Meath), who brought me all except a few facts which I discovered as
the profit of my own exertion.
But my heart within me thinks of the love of Patrick, because I
see that deserters and arrant graspers and soldiers of Hibernia hate the
paruchia of Patrick, because they have robbed him of what was his
own, since, if the successor of Patrick were to seek what belongs to his
paruchia, he could restore to it almost the whole island, because God
gave to him the whole island and its inhabitants through the Angel of
the Loi'd, . . and it is not lawful for a spear [lignum ?] to be sent
against him, because he is everybliing appertaining to the primacy of
the Irish Church, and every oath that is taken is taken by him [i.e., on
the Canoin Padraic or the Bachall Jesu].^
The statement about the angel clearly refers to the story
in the Liber Angueli that an angel appeared to Patrick to
tell him that the Lord had given him the primacy, and defining
the boundaries of the See of Armagh ; and it was, probably, to
these muniments of title that Mael Suthain refers in the entry
made by him at the foot of Fol. 16 between the Tirechan text
and the Liber Angueli.^^
Saint Patrick, going up to Heaven, bequeathed the fruit of his
labours, the fruit of baptisms, suits, and alms to be yielded to the
apostolic city, which in Gaelic is called Ard Macha. So I have found
^ Omnia quae scripsi a principio libri bujus (i.e., Liber ii.) scitis quia ia
vestris regionibus gesta sunt nisi de eis pauca qu^e inveni in utibtatem laboris
mei a senioribbs multis ac ab illo Ultano episcopo Conchuburnensi qui nutrivit
me retubt sermo. Cor autem meum cogitat in me de Patricii dilectione quia
video dessertores et arobiclocos et mibtes Hibernise quod odio babont parucbiam
Patricii quia substraxerunt ab eo quodipsiuserat timentque quoniamsi quaereret
heres Patricii parucbiam iUius potest pene totam insulam sibi reddere in
parochiam quia Deus dedit iUi totam insolara, cum bominibus per Anguelura
Domini (* * *) ot non bgnum beet contra eura mitti quia ipsius sunt omnia
primitiviC ecclesia; Hibernicae sed juratur a se omne quod juiatur, Ann. BolL II.,
45; Trip. Life, 312. This text is obscure, but very important.
Archiclocos, Windisch suggests apxtt:\w.>j£c the " p " being changed to "1,"
wbicb found favour with Stokes, and at first with Bury. On second thoughts
Bury says: " Reflection has convinced me that. this assumption of the change
from '• p" to " 1 " in the case of a very rare, if not unique loan word such as
this would be, cannot be maintained. The true solution is much simpler. The
second "c" in the word is either redundant, or is a mistake for "1," and what
Tirechan wrote was Arcbilocos or Archillocos ; that is Archilocos, meaning
malignant poets or satirists, E. H. Rev., 17, 704, 257. We confess we do not
bad the solution simple. We suggest a composite word from " Archi," arrant,
and gtACAim I grasp, the " arrant graspers," euphemistic for plunderers, or
grabbers.
^ Trip. LifQ, 336 — " It is in an eleventh century hand "
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS. 177
in the great book (Bibliothecis) of the Scots. I, Calvxis Peennis (i.e.,
Mael-Suthain) have written this in the presence of Brian, Emperor of
the Scots, and what I have written he has fixed (finivit) for all the
kings of Cashel.
Mael-Suthain was the anamchara of Brian, '' Imperator Scotorum "
The residue of the text is importaut from another point of
view and is clearly not the work of Tirechan. It concludes
with a " Breviarium " or short summary of contents.
Here ends the Breviarium of the race, name, genealogy, boyhood,
seizures (captivitatum), virtues. Christian ministry, writing (documen-
tum), indiistry, curses of sinners, blessings of the pious, age at death. All
which done in the Lord have been brought together and collected by old
men of great knowledge and skill (antiquis peritissimis).
The previous text, however, does not contain any notice of
St. Patrick's race (gens.), or genealogy, or two seizures. The
Breviarium belonged, we think, to a work of which only part
is given in our text. Professor Bury is of opinion that the
Breviarium is an index to Muirchu as well as to Tirechan.
We cannot accept this view. It would be an inadequate index
for Muirchu and he has been already provided with an elabo-
rate table of contents, and nobody would think of looking to
the end of Tirechan to find out what was contained in Muirchu.
We suffsrest it was an index to the " documentum " named in
the text, namely the "Commemoratio laborum," — the " Scriptio
sua," and it is probable that the account of the gens., gene-
alogy, and two seizures was omitted from the Tirechan text
because it was to be found a few folios back in the text of
Mairchu. What is oriven in the text is either an addition to
Muirchu or differs from him and from the Confession. It
begins as follows : —
" I have found," the writer says, " four names ascribed to Patrick
in the Book with Ultan bishop of the Dal Conchubar (Ardbraccan) —
1 Saint Magonius ; which is bright (clarus), 2 Succetus ; 3 Patricius ;
4 Cothirthiacus who served four households of Magi (draoi). And one
of them named Miliuc bought him and he served him seven years in
service of all kinds with double (time of) labour and he placed him as
a swineherd. in mountain valleys.
" In the 17th year of his age he was taken captive, carried to
Hibernia, and sold there. In the 22nd year of his age he was able to
leave the wizard. Seven years more he walked, or sailed over seas, or
lived in fields or mountain vallej's, through the Gauls, and all Italy,
and on the islands which are in the Tyrrhene Sea, as he tells himself in
N
178 EARLY IRISH HISTOR'X.
the commemoration of his labours', and he was in one of the islands,
called Aralanensis [Arelatensis], 30 years, as Ultan, the bishop, testified
to me, and all things that happened to him you will find plainly set
forth in his narrative. These are the ' mirabilia ' happily performed
by him in the fifth year of the reign of Laoghaire MacNeill.^ From
the passion to the death of St. Patrick are reckoned 436 years, and
Laoghaire reigned for five years after the death of St. Patrick." The
length of his z'eign was 36 years, an we think ^
The text further states :--• -
St. Patrick landed at Inis Patrick with a multitude of holy
bishops and presbyters. He consecrated 450 bishops !
Near the end of the text we find :
The age of Patrick, as has been handed down to us, is reckoned as
follows : — -In his seventh year he was baptised ; in his tenth he was
captured ; for seven years he was a slave ; for thirty years he read ;
for seventy-two years he taught. The sum total of his age was 120
years, like Moses. In four tilings Patrick was like Moses. 1. He
heard an angel from a bush. 2. He fasted forty days and forty nights.
3. He lived 120 yeai's. 4. Where his bones are no one knew. Two
hosts fought for the body for twelve days and twelve nights, and for
that (space of time) they saw no night, but daylight always. On the
twelfth day they came to fight (still) and each of the two hosts (by
miracle) saw the body on its portable bier amongst themselves, and
they did not fight. Columcille, inspired by the Holy Spirit, pointed
out the sepulchre of Patrick."
*2 According to the Four Masters Laoghaire died 458 A.D., after reigning
for 30 years.
23 In XVII. setatis suae anno captus, ductus yenditus est in Hiberniam ; in
XXII. anno laboris magis (read magni) relinquere potuit; VII. aliis annis
ambulavit et navigavit in fluctibus, in campestribus locis, et .„ convallibns
moatanis per Gallias et Italian! totain atque in insulis qxvx sunt in mari
Terreno. ut ipse dixit in comraemoratione laborum. Erat hautem in una ex
insulis qu:e dicitur Aralanensis annis XXX. mihi testante Ultano episcopo.
Omnia bautem quae evenerunt (ei) invenietis in plana bistoria illius scripts. —
Trip. Life, p. 302.
Aralanensis is, we think, Lerins, the island Sancti Honorati Arelatensis,
i.e., of Saint Honoratus, bishop of Aries. It is now called Saint Honorat.
Bury thinks the Commemoratio Laborum in the text means the Confession,
though the writer cVd not, in fact, consult the Confession.
" The only written sources," he writes, " to which Tirechan refers, are a book
^hich belonged to Bishop Ultan, and the Confession of St, Patrick, It is tolerably
clear that he^had before him only this book of Acta, and did not consult the Con-
fession, though he refers to it as the saint's own Commemoratio Laborum. We
think tke Commemoratio Laborum was erroneously reputed to be " scriptio sua."
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMEXTS. 179
The hosts that fought, and their children, must have for-
gotten the saint very soon, which is incredible, and did not
deserve the assistance of the Holy Spirit. St. Patrick died in
493, and Columba went to lona in 563. A similar story is told
of Columba and St. Martin of Tours. On visiting Tours,
Columba was asked to point out the grave of St. Martin,
which he agreed to do on condition that he should receive
everything that should be found in the grave, except the
bones. The Annals of Ulster state that in 554 (sixty-one years
after the saint's death) our saint's relics were enshrined by
Columba. Three precious reliquaries were then found in the
tomb — the cup, the angel's gospel, and the Bell of the Will.
There is no mention of a miracle; nor has Adamnan heard
of it.
In another place the writer quotes St. Patrick's alleged
statement that he gave money presents to tribal chiefs to
secure a safe passage in the districts which he was in the
habit of visiting. The passage referred to is not found in the
Armagh text of the Confession, but appears in the Cotton and
Fell MSS. of the 11th century, and in the Vedast MS., probably
of the same period.
It is as follows:
At the same time I gave presents to the Kings besides the cost of
keeping their sons who walked with me, in order that they (i.e., the
Kings) should not seize me with my companions. . . ,
But you know how much I expended on those who were judges
throughout all the districts which I used more frequently to visit. And
I think I paid them the price of not less than fifteen men, so
that you might enjoy me, and I might enjoy you in the Lord. I do not
repent of it, yea, it is not enough for me. I still spend and will spend
more.^
This extraordinary fantasy about the saint's bribing kings
and judges may be compared with the prayer in the Tripartito
Life when he got the staff of Jesus from the Lord, "and
^ Patricius etiam pretium xii. animarum hominum ut in scriptione sua
affirmat de argcnto et aere ut nullus malorum hominum impediret eos in via
recta transeuntes totam Hibernian. — Tirechan, Trip. Lfie. 310, line 5.
Censeo enim non minus quam pretium quindecim hominum distribui illis
—Trip. Life, 372, from Cotton MSS.
ISO EARLY iRISH HISTORY.
Patrick asked three favours from him — namely, (1) to be ou
His right hand in the Kingdom of Heaven ; (2) that he might
be judge of the Gael on doomsday; and (3) as much gold and
silver as his nine companions could carry, to be given to the
Gael for believing." Again, "He took gold to Miliuc to
irQBress belief upon him, for he knew that Miliuc was greedy
for ^old."
The Apostle was not a company promoter, nor a millionaire,
nor a "souper."' He did not march forward as a soldier of
Christ with sword, or money bag, or soup kitchen. He carried
nothing with him but the Gospel and the Cross. In hoc signo
vicit.
In the Tirechan text we read : " And they " (St. Patrick
and his companions) " began to travel to Mount Egli, and
Patrick paid to them the price of fifteen lives of men, as he
affirms in his writing, in silver and gold, that no evil-minded
person should hinder them going on the straight road across
Hibernia," ^ The writing (scriptio sua) referred to here must
be the documentu7)i, the Commemoratio Lahoru'm, and it
seems not unlikely that the writer of the addition to tho
Armagh Confession, in other texts, found that the statement
and many more equally incredible in the Commemoratio
Lahorum, which we feel confident our saint would never have
written. For instance, let us take the first paragraph of the
matter added to the Armagh text from the Cotton MS.
•o
And when I was assailed by some of my seniors who opposed (my
consecration) to the laborious episcopate on account of my sins I was
indeed strongly impelled on that day to fall then and for ever. But
the Lord spared a proselyte and a pilgrim for His name's sake. He
graciously and powerfully aided me in this attempt to trample on me
because I had not evilly proceeded to wickedness and shame. I pray
God that the circumstance be not reckoned to them as sin, for after
thirty years they found me out and uryed against (me) a word which I
had confessed before I was a deacon. Through pain of mind I told a
most intimate friend what I had done in one day in my boyhood, nay,
in one hour because I had not strength as yet. I know not, God
knows, if I was then fifteen years old. For I did not believe in one
God, not from my infancy, but I remained in doubt and unbelief until
I was severely chastened.
® See preceding note.
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS. 181
The -writer of this had a nucleus for the romance in the
statemeni at the opening of the Confession that the saint did
not know God truly then (verum Deum). This the writer, not
understanding its true import, changes to " one " (" verum " to
" unum ") God, and makes our Saint out an unbeliever and a
pagan. The terrible sin is not mentioned. Zimmer, however,
has found it out. "Young Sucat," he says " gave himself up
to worldly pleasures, and himself owns to having sinned against
the sixth commandment [i.e., committed adultery) when in
his fifteenth year." '-° When will those additions and men-
dacities come to an end ?
Surely it is high time that the men of Erin at least should
take their stand on what is written in the Book of Armagh
under the authority of the Co-arbs of the Apostle in the
primacy of the fatherland.-^
Another crime laid to the charge of our Saint furnishes a
good example of how a harmless legend becomes metamor-
phosed. We refer to the theft of the relics.
In the Trip. Life itself there are evidently two stories mixed
up. In the first, the angel appears to the saint and tells how
the relics are to be divided to-day (indiu) in Rome for the
four quarters of the world, and says, " I will carry you, &c.
And the angel carried Patrick into the air."
This was clearly for the purpose of taking him off to Rome in
time for the distribution, and we expect to find him present on
that day in Rome and getting his share. Not so, however,
runs the text. He goes to Waterford, thence by ship to
«« Zimmer, Celtic Church, 43,
* The collections in the Book of Armagh, written in the seventli century,
must be taken as authorities in preference to all of later date, which are
evidently but systematized amplirications of them. Yet it will be seen that
even in these documents the stalements are so vague and contradictory that
nothing very conclusive can be gleaned from them. The first in a ruder style is
the same in substance as that by Probus. — Petrie, Tara, 83.
Facile constat inter eruditos post Confessionem Patricii, utruraque monu-
mentum Libri Armachani antiquissimnm esse omnium quae de sancti apostoli
historia ad nos peruenerit. Immo non dubitat Petrie omnes vitas Patricii quas
edidit Colganus ex hoc solo fonte prodesse. Quod omnmo certum est de vita
quje Probi nomine inscribitur ; hfcc enim ita insistit vestigiis Muirchu Maecu-
mustheni (nisi quod de missione B-omana Patricii qufedam hausit i!e Tirechano)
ut manifesta habenda sit illius magis latior et elegantior recensio. — Ho.siaa, S.J.,
Ann. Boll, I. 243.
182 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Bordeaux, thence to Rome, "and sleep," the text proceeds.
" came over the inhabitans of Rome, so that Patrick brought
away as much as he wanted, i.e., 365 relics, together with the
relics of Paul, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and many others.
Patrick left that collection at Armagh."
In Colgan it appears amplified again — vires acquisivit
eundo.
Bj a pious stratagem or theft, whilst the custodians of the sacred
places were asleep and knowing nothing, but, as is believed, with the
connivance of the Pope, he, Patrick, took a multitude of relics and carried
them a A ay to Hibernia.^
There is no reference, we need hardly say, to these felonious
proceedings in the Book of Armagh. The writer came to the
conclusion that though there was flat robbery there was no
sacrilege, and waxes into enthusiasm over this obscure and
puzzling discovery.
" Oh, wonderous deed," he exclaims, " seldom equalled — the theft of
a vast treasure of holy things carried off from the most holy place in
the world without committing sacrilege." ! !^'
Many more illustrations of this falsification of traditions
might be adduced. We shall only give two. The Tripartite
Life fp. 194J states, referring to the saint's visit to Cashel : —
" When Oengus, the son of Natfraich, arose in the morning all
the images were ' innaligib ' — batur imarachta huili innaligih
— and Patrick and his people found him beside the fort." The
Life continues : — " He (Oengus) gives them welcome and brings
them into the fort." Now " innaligib " means literally " in
their beds or in their graves," and probably was meant to
convey that they had been put away by Oengus. They were
probably representations of the sun and the moon, etc, as we
have already explained, and if there was anything miraculous
to relate about them the writer of the Tripartite would
undoubtedly not have omitted it. He was, however, satisfied
2spio astu furtove sacrorum locorum custodibus nesciei^tibus et dorm en-
tibus et summo ut creditur connivente Pontifice, accepit ingeutem sacrarum
reliquiarum multitudinem quas secuin iu Hiberniam, asportavit. — Acta SS.,
vol. II., p. 264.
^O mirum facinus rarumque, ingentis thesauri ex loco mundi sacratissimo
rapti sacrarumque rei'um furtum sine sacrilegio commissum. — Colgan, Acta, SS.,
II.. 164.
THE PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS. 183
witli the bare statement of fact. Not so, however, Jocelyn.
He was a French Cistercian monk from Furness, in Lancashire,
and came to Erin as a friend and supporter of the Angevins,
and in particular of De Courcy, " the plunderer of churches
and territories " ('pin). He wrote his " Life " — the Vita Quinta
of Colgan — between 1183 and 1186.
" Many fools (he writes, in his preface) have written the Hfe of St,
Patrick with a pious intent but in an' unhandsome style, by which
disgust is often excited and sometimes tardiness of belief. I will season
the life of the saint, if not with all the excellence of our tongue, at least
with some of its elegance."
He tells us that the saint journeyed into Munster —
And the king thereof, Oengus, met the holy prelate rejoicing and giv-
ing thanks in the exultation of his heart, as on that day occasion wao
minstered to him of joy and of belief for that in the morning when he
entered the temple to adore his idols he beheld them all prostrate on
the ground. And so often as he raised them, so often by the Divine
power, were they cast down, nor could they stand upright, but continu-
ally were overthrown. And as Dagon could not stand at the approach
of the Ark of the Testament, so neither could the idols stand the
approach of St. Patrick.^"
His account of the saint's mother is novel and interesting,
Muirchu knew nothing of it : —
Calphurnius married a French damsel named Concessa, a niece of
the Blessed Martin, Archbishop of Tours, and the damsel was elegant
in her form and in her manners ; for, having been brought from France
with her elder sister into the northern parts of Britain and there sold
at the command of her father, Calphurnius, being pleased with her
manners, charmed with her attentions, and attracted by her beauty,
very much loved her, and from the state of a serving maid in his house-
hold raised her to be his companion in wedlock.
Our concluding illustration shall be Jocelyn's masterpiece,
" The Miracle of the Love-sick Nun." The lady was Ercnat,
Daire's daughter. Muirchu tells us : —
"■o"
There was a rich man of rank in the Eastern part (of Oirghialla).
named Daire, and Patrick asked him for a site for religious worship.
"What place do you want?" asked Daire. "That height called
Willow Hill (Druim Sailech)," said the saint. Daire refused to give
that site then, but after some incidents not necessary to be mentioned
here he save it, and St. Patrick and Daire went to consider the miracle
2" Vita, c. 74, Swifte.
184 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
or the ofFering and to view the well-jilea.sing donation, and they
ascended the height, and thev found in the place a doe with its little
fawn Ij'ing where the altar of the church at the left now is at Ard
Macha. And the companions of Patrick wished to take and kill the
fawn, but the saint would not permit it. Nay, he took up the fawn
himself and carried it on his shoulders, and the doc followed him like
a pet sheep until he lay down the fawn in another field at the North
side of Ard Macha, where, as knowledgeable men say, there are marks
remaining to this day of his pious act (signa virtutis ejus).*^
Muirchu knows nothing or says nothing, about the follow-
ing addition to this charming little episode, which is found in
the Triiiobrtite Life (233) : —
Daire's daughter loved Eenen. Sweet to her seemed his voice at
the chanting. An illness came upon her, and thereof she died. Benen
took creta (cretra = consecrata ?) to her from Patrick, and straightway
that holy virgin rose up alive, and afterwards she loved him, spiritually.
She is Ercnat, Daire's daughter, who is (buried) in Tamlacta Bo.^
Jocelyn presents the story " with the excellence and the
elegance of the tongue," but we doubt if these qualities of
style have entirely removed our " tardiness of belief."
" The venerable Benignus," he writes, " excelled in the song of a
sweet voice, so that he penetrated the liearts and ears of all who heard
him. So out of the melody of his voice did the tempter minster the
occasion of sin. For a nun, whilst she wa3 delighted with the sweet
singing of Benignus, entertained, at length, a more earnest desire
towards the man of God, who knew nothing of this unhallowed flame
which hai'dly could she contain in her bosom. Taught by a woman's
cunning, she feigned extreme illness, and withdrew as into her sick bed,
and besought that from Benignus she might receive spiritual counsel
and the Holy Communion. But St. Patrick, at the revelation of the
Spirit, was not ignorant of what distemper did the nun labour under.
He sent Beni2[nus. Wonderful was the event. The damsel, raising
her eyes at his entrance, beheld Benignus very terrible in his stature,
and his face as breathing forth flames, and she beheld herself blazing
within and without, and St. Patrick standing nigh, covering his face
with his hands.^
Great saints are not exempt from some of the perils that
attend other forms of greatness. The biographer lies in wait
for them.
31 Muiiclin, c. 24, Trip. Life, 290.
* In the MartjTolofry of Donegal it is stated that Benisrnus, afterwards St,
Patrick's co-arb in Armagh, " was then a psalm singer with his master Patrick,"
nnd that after recovering Ercnat offered her virginity to God, so that she went to
heaven. The " creta " was probably " uisce cousecrata," holy water. — Martyr
Dons^. 30.
^•^ Jocelyn, c. 97, abridged.
C 1S5 ]
CHAPTER XII.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SA.INT PATRICK.
THE religion of the Gael before the advent of Christianity
can, in its general outlines, be ascertained with a reasonable
degree of certainty. The evolution of their religious con-
ceptions followed a normal course, and by comparing what we
know of them with our knowledge of other branches of the
Aryan family, we can fix, with precision, the stage at which it
had arrived. The religion of the Celestial Fire* or light, pre.
dominated ; the sun and the moon were the principal objects
of worship. But beside and below this cultus were survivals
from the animistic period ; sometimes referred to as poly-
demonism. This consisted in a belief in the existence of
spirits, or demons, animating, or watching over everything,
and that everything could be controlled or influenced by
verbal formulas, incantations, or magical practices known only
to the wizards. These wizards became fortune-tellers, obtaining
information from the demons they controlled; and, being observers
of the heavens, and having power over the elements — wind,
rain, and mist — they became in due course astrologers. It was
the superstitions connected with polydemonism that the
Church found everywhere the most difficult to eradicate.
The Church admitted the existence of evil spirits, their
intelligence, activity, and implacable hatred of mankind.
Speaking of the cultus of stones, in the valley of Lebroust, in
the centre of the Pyrenees, a writer, quoted by Bertrand, stated,
in 1877 :—
These enchanted (sacrees) stones are most frequently found near
springs, and are boulders or blocks of unhewn granite ... In vain
do the priests fight against them in the pulpit. They have not suc-
ceeded in extirpating them from all hearts. In vain do they get these
vestiges of persistent paganism secretly destroyed, particularly those
near which young men and girls keep tryst. When the inhabitants
catch the destroyers at work, they assemble, and prevent them. If the
■work has been accomplished unknown to them, they gather up
the broken pieces and replace them, and continue the cultus. It is
ISf) EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
necessary to remove the pieces to a distance, aud scatter them.
Sometimes a cross is placed on the spot to appropriate to religion the
respect in which it was held.^
Was the Lia Fail sent away for this reason 1 We shall see.
The Gael were approaching polytheism, or, possibly, even
monotheism, but had not reached either. There were no
temples or man-shaped idols among them such as are found in
abundance everywhere else in Europe. None have been found
above ground or underground at Usnach, Tara, Tlachtga,
Tailltin, Cruachan, or elsewhere in Erin, except at MaghSlecht.
St. Patrick tells us in the Confession, as we have seen, that
the Irish had no knowledge of God, but worshipped idols and
unclean things (idula et immunda). What were these idula ?
Were they man-shaped ? We submit they were not. There
are two entries in Cormac's glossary which throw much light
on this point. We quote them here in full :
Idol, i.e., ab idolo, ct^og in the Greek, forma in the Latin, unde dicitur
idolum, that is the forms and representations of the idols or the elements
{nandulaf which the heathen used to make formerly.
Indelba, i.e., the names of the altars of these idols, because they
■were wont to make {dofornetesf on them the figures (delba) of every-
thing (or of the elements) * they adored, verbi gratia figura solis
(figure of the sun).
This is further illustrated by the following story told by
Keating : —
There was a priest in Tir Conell in the time of Colum Cille who
built or erected a church of splendid stone and erected an altar with
glass in it, and put shapes of the sun and moon in it, in that church ; ^
and shortly after that came a weakness and a swoon upon that priest,
and a demon came to him after that and tof)k him with him in the air,
and after a while they came near Colum Cille, overhead him. He
caught sight (of them) and stretched out the sign of the holy cross over-
head in the air. So with that the priest fell down from above. And
accordingly the priest dedicated the church to Colum Cille for his help
from the hands of the demon, and became a monk himself and spent a
good life from that oul^
^ Bertrand, La Religion des Gaulois, p. 4d.
2 Nandula — creatures. Stokes.
' Dofornetes — carve. Stokes.
* Cormac's glossary. Stokes 94, 95, compiled 890, A.D. (c).
^ Delba in uile no adratis (no nandula odortaes).
The uile not translated by Stokes is important, as it would include the sun and
moon which, however, the Gael would then classify as " dula."
® Stokes gives text and translation, Rev. Celt., xx., 428.
"Do t)i Sajaiic a^ Ci^i Conelt An Aimfiji Cotuim Citle no cinroAis no "oo
cojAib eAjlef -oo clocAib UAifle "] ■oo cojAib Atcoip 5loine itice, "j do cuif
•ocAlb 'sjietne "] eAjiCA •do -oeAlb fAn eAjitef* rm 1 .'^o Sfo-o "oa eif j-in
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK, 187
Keating found the story doubtless in the Egerton MS. or
some copy of it, "which states :
There was a wealthy priest wlio adorned his church with precious
stones, i.e., a church that was in his cell (a church in which his cell
was ?), and made an altar of crystal and wrought (thereon) the shape of
the sua and the moon.^
O'Mahony^ understood Keating to refer to a heathen priest
but he could not havo called a heathen priest a fA^Afc. We
deemed it right, therefore, to give the Gaelic text, not hitherto
printed, in full. It seems that the good priest had more zeal
than discretion. The altar was not, of course, of crystal. It
was probably of wood with panes of glass in it shaped like the
sun and moon and lighted from behind. There were then no
heathen priests nor heathen temples in Erin.
The heathen practices connected with polydemonism were
condemned by several councils — by St. Augustine in Africa ;
by St. Csesarius of Aries, in the south of France ; and by St.
Eligius in the North. St. Eloi (Eligius, 588-659) was born
near Limoges, in the" suburbium "^of which, as his deed of grant
states, he founded and endowed with lands the great Abbey of
Solignac, which is eight miles south of the city. The charter
or deed of grant from him to the abbot Remadus expressly
states that it is given on condition " thatyou and your successors
follow the way of religion of the most holy men of the monas-
tery of Luxeuil, and firmly keep the rule of PP. Benedict and
Columbanus.^° ' Thus side by side in the same religious house
we find the rule of St. Colum was observed with that of St.
Benedict, until the greater practical sense of the latter code
superseded the more rigid legislation of the former. Whilst
not in any way lax, the Benedictine rule did not prescribe an
rAijt AnbpAin "] niofi aiji An f a^ahc fin "] CAini^ -oeAmAn cuij;e tAji fin t)o
jiug teic f An Aieo{i e, ■] An c^tAc cAnsATJOii AnjAjt -do Cotum Cilte of a cion,
fUAj\ AWA^c 1 x>o fine comAtcoA nA c|toice nAeoriiCA of a cion f An Aieoiti guji
tuic An fAgAf.c teiffin ec •do Biein -oo lobAi^i An fAjAfC An eAjtef -do
Cotum Cilte cfe nA foificin a tAtriAib An -oeAniuin -j vo cviait) fein An opx»
iriAnAC 5«|t CA1C a Aimfef 50 niAic o fin auiac. — MS. Vellum, by Dermot
O'Connor, written in 1730, Brit. Mus. add. 18, 745, p. 144.
'"Ootusne Atcoiti slumnae "] r)0|ii5ne T)etb Sfene *) e|tco.
SQMahony, p. 463.
^ So the Vicus Bonavem was in the suburbium of Taruanna.
^^ Et tamen conditione inteiposita ut vos et successores vestri tramitem
religionis sanctissimorum virorum Luxoviensis monasterii consequamini et regu-
1am beatissimorum PP. Benedicti et Columbani firmiter teneatis. Migne, vol.
87-col. 659.
ISS EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
asceticism which could be practised only by the few, and the
most ample powers were given to the superior to adapt
the regulations to all circumstances of times and places. The
Columban rule, on the other hand, was one of great rigour, and
would, if carried out in its entirety, have made the Celtic
monks almost, if not quite, the most austere of men." ^^
The Monastery of St. Eloi was remarkable for Having a
number of artistic handicraftsmen, skilful particularly in
goldsmiths' work, in which St. Eloi himself excelled, and
Limoges became celebrated in the Middle Ages for ecclesiastical
gold work. We incline to believe that the foundation was
largely recruited from the countrymen of Columbanus.
The heathenish practices to which we have referred are
nowhere more exhaustively enumerated than in a sermon by
St. Eloi, which is preserved in his Life by his contemporary
and biographer, St. Ouen, Bishop of Rouen (A.D. 640). We
shall give here, in abridged form, such parts as are applicable
to polydemonism in Erin, and which show forth briefly and
authoritatively what this cult of polydemonism was in practice.
Eligius became Bishop of Noyon in A.D. 640. It was then
one of the most important cathedral cities in France,
Charlemagne was crowned there in A.D. 768 : —
Above all, I warn and adjure you (the Bishop said). Let no man
observe the sacrilegious practices of the pagans or dare to consult
persons who make charms, or practise fortune-telling, or sorcery, or
magic on account of sickness, or for any other reason. Observe not
auguries, or sneezing, nor, when on a journey, attend to the singing of
birds. Let no Christian take note of the day on which he leaves home,
nor the day on which he returns, nor of the day of the month, nor
of the moon, before commencing any work.
Let no one on the Feast of St. John take part in the " Solstitia,"
or jumping, or dancing, or carolling, or devilish songs, or call on the
name of Neptune, Diana, Orcus, Minerva, or the Genii, or believe in
nonsense of that sort. Let no Christian light luminwia (fires or
" cleares "), and make vows or prayers at shrines, or stones, or springs,
or trees, or "cellas" (spots struck by lightning, collicellas ?), or cross
roads. Let no one tie charms around the neck of man or beast. Let
no one make sprinklings, or incantations on herbs, or dare to make the
^^ Abbot Gasquet, English Monastic Life, p. 214 and 11, citing Hound Celtic
Church of Wales ,p. 1 66. !St. Eloi wanted his monks to be " the most austere of men."
By the Canons of the Council of Aix-la-Chapelle (which was held in 817, under
Jjouis le T>ehona.ire in domo A quisy rani palatii qucc ab Lateranis dicitur, at the in-
stance of St. Benedict of Aiiiane, near Montpellier, one of the reformers of the
Benedictines, it was ordained that all the monks in the empire ^■llould follow the
reformed Benedictine rule and liturgy. This order was enforeed by the secul?'
arm— Hefele (Tr. Delarc), V. 218.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. 189
cattle pass through the hollow of a tree or through a hole in the
earth, because by this he openly consecrates them to the devil.
Let no woman hang amher from her neclc.
Let no one shout at an eclipse of the moon.
Let no one call the sun and the moon lords (dominos), nor stvear by
them}^
The Abb^ Arbellot, in his interesting Life of St. Eloi (1898).
tells us that the custom relating to cattle, above mentioned,
still exists in some parts of Limousin.^^
The oldest form of the Gaelic oath we are acquainted with
consisted in giving and taking as sureties or securities the
elements. Ferdiad tells Meve, in the Tain, that he will not
fio-ht Cuchulain without this oath : —
o
I will not go without securities
*****
Without the sun and moon
Together with the sea and lantL
Hi p^Sr^ 5^" PACA
* * * *
gAti stiein ocAf epci
Ia niUlf OCAf CI]!.
This was the substance of the solemn Gaelic oath till
Christianity took root. It was the oath taken by Laoghaire
not long before his death, " He gave the securities of the sun
and of the wind, and of the elements to the men of Leinster.''
He broke this pledge, and next year (458 A.D.), " the sun and
the wind killed him because he had outraged them" (xip pop^p-
Ai$ lA-o),
The violation of a guarantee or security, whether in the
case of a god-element or of a man, was a heinous outrage
in the estimation of the Gael, We have seen the effects
in the case of Fergus MacRoigh. A case is recorded where
a son killed his own father for the violation of an oath in which
the son was given as security. It will be observed that there
is no mention in the formula quoted of any god of the sun or
the moon or the earth, where we should expect to find them if
they were objects of worship. The Church was, of course,
opposed to this oath, and a transition formula appears to
have been adopted. The words sun, moon, sea, and land,
given as securities were excluded, and the substituted formula
ran: — "I swear by the oath of my people" (long a coing mo tiiAt)
12 Migne, vol. 87, col. 528.
13 Vi-e de St. Eloi. p. 3:.
190 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
M. d'Arbois has given a very interesting comparison of the
*' Celtic " with the Homeric oath, the latter of which names
gods and elements together.^* There was, also, the soldiers'
oath. He swore by his arms, his comrades in battle. He
looked for help to the power within the bronze or the iron.
The Homciic auroc tij)t\KeTai ai'^pa ailrjpoq — the iron itself
draws the man on to it — was, probably, used originally m
this sense. This form of oath was also customary with the
Germans, as Grimm tells us.^^
Spenser says : —
So do the Irish at this day -when they go to battle say certain
prayers or charms to their swords, raaking a cross therewith upon the
earth, and thrusting the points of the blades into the ground, thinking
thereby to have the better success in fight. Also, they used commonly
to swear by their swords.
Caesarius (476-544), " Dragged from the monastery of Lerins,
to be Archbishop of Aries," warns his ilock to cut down and
destroy any trees or altars or such like things on their lands
to which the people resorted for vows. He states that when a
sacred tree fell the people would not use any part of it
for fuel.^^
O'Donovan tells us in his Supplement to O'Reilly (1864) : —
There is an ancient tree growing in Borrisokane, Tipperary, 22 feet
in diameter. It is held in peculiar veneration by the peasantry, who
would not cut off any part of it for fuel, because they believe that the
house in which any part of it should be burnt would soon meet the
same fate.^'^
The cultus of trees, stones, wells, etc., need not detain us.
There is one particular cult, however, which deserves notice —
that is, the custom, which continues to our time, of imaking
rounds at holy wells. How did this originate, and why ? An
explanation occurs to us, which we deem it right to offer foi
consideration. It was, we surmise, the adaptation of a primitive
well-cult to the ritual of sun-worship. The votary faced
the east, and turned to the right hand, " desiul " with the
course of the sun. The two cults were tlius combined after the
sun bad become the paramount object of worship. The Church
^* Rev. ArcMologiqiie, Aug. 1892, p. 2^^-
^^ Deutsches Alterthum, .S-lii.
^« -Migno. vol. 33, col. :i2u7.
" U. D. Suppl. Bile.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. 191
was not able to extirpate these practices completely, but suc-
ceeded to a large extent in modifying them, and in associating
them, when purged of paganism, with Christian beliefs. " The
Church," writes Bossuct, "resigned herself to taking part in
them (St. John's Fires), in order to banish heathenism (super-
stitions) from them."^^
In connection with the cult of the Celestial Fire, there was
no function more important than its reproduction annually in
perfect purity. Fire may have been originally discovered by
observing it produced by one branch of a tree rubbing against
another, or by the rubbing of stalks of corn against each other
in a gentle wind, as sometimes happens now in the West Indies.
The Greeks believed that Prometheus stole it in a reed from
heaven.
The primitive way of producing fire was by rubbing two
sticks one against the other, in the form either of the fire drill
or of the stick and groove. The fire thus produced is called in
Gaelic tene eigin, or, " forced fire." Tliere is no reference to
the mode of producing this fire, nor is it, so far as we are
aware, even named in our texts. The magical production of
fire is mentioned, and one wizard was called Lugaid Delbaith
— the fire-producer — who built a large fire-pile which he
ignited by Druidic power.^^
In Cormac's glossary we find the following : —
Belltaine, Mayday, i.e., bil-tane — fire for luck, lucky fire, which
Druids used to make with great incantations, and they used to bring
the cattle (as a safeguard) against the diseases of each year to those
fires. (In the margm is added) they used to drive the cattle between
these fires.20
The Gaelic words -oo gmcif va •ofAi'Oe con cenceclAit* mop^it)
imply, we think, that the wizards not merely ignited, but
made the fire. xX^n^t) was the kindling of the fire.
Carmichael, in the Carmina Gadelica (1901) gives a most
interesting account of how this " neid " fire was produced in
the Hebrides (Innif Cau), and the attendant ceremonies. In
North Uist the neid fire was produced by rapidly boring with
an auger, i.e., the fire-drill. This was accomplished by the
exertions of the " naoi naomearcind ginealach Mac" — the nine
)t ,
** Cat'chisme de Meaux, p. 26(
"()' Curry MS. II., 220.
^ CQi'inac'i Gloss, 19. Stokea.
192 :,_EAELY IRISH HISTORY.
Qines of first-beg-otten sons. Sail Dairach (oak log) obtained
its name from the log of oak for the neid fire being there, A
fragment riddled with auger holes still remains. Mr. Alexander
Mackay, of Reay, Sutherland, says :-*-
My father was the skipper of a fishing crew. Before beginning
:)perations for the season the crews met at night at our house . . .
After settUng accounts they put out the fire on the heartli. They
then rubbed two pieces of wood one against the other so rapidly as to
produce fire, the men joining in one after the other, and working with
the utmost energy, never allowing the friction to relax. Fi-om this
friction-fire they then re-kindled the fire on the hearth, from which all
the men present carried away a kindling to their own houses.
The neid fire was resorted to in imminent or actual
calamity, upon the first day of the quarter, and to ensure
success in great or important events. A woman in Arran
paid her father and the other men of the townland used to
make the neid fire on the knoll on the " La buidhe Bealtain "
— " Yellow day of Beltane." The fire of purification was
kindled from the neid fire, while the domestic fire was re-kindled
from the fire of purification. This was divided into two fires,
between which the people and cattle rushed australly for
purposes of purification. The neid fire was made down to a
comparatively recent period ; in North Uist about the year
1829 ; in Arran, about 1820 ; in Reay, about 1830.21
The production of the neid fire in Erin would not have
been prevented by the dampness of the climate. It was
practised in Tyrone at the commencement of the last century,
probably by some of the Scotch, who settled in that county
after the confiscations in Ulster. This appears from the
Collowiug narrative which we have condensed from the Journal
of the Kilkenny Archceological Society : —
Bernard Bannon of Cavancarragh, near Enniskillen, states that
when " Big Head " appeared amongst the cattle the men of the townland
assembled on the farm to make " neid fire," and covered it with
" scraws," and used the smoke as a cure by forcing the cattle, with open
mouths, to hold their heads over it. Having got two pieces of dry
wood two men commenced to rub them violently together till friction
produced fire. He heard his father say he himself had helped to kindle
a neid fire and that it was very hard work ; each pair of men rubbed
in turn. Before the neid fire was made every fire in the townland was
extinguished. After the cure every extinguished^ fire got a burning
coal from the neid fire to rekindle it. He remembered when at school,
*^ Carmichael A., Carmina Gadclica, vol. II., p. 340 (condensed).
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK, 193
being then about 7 years old, the scliolars telling that the men in the
townland of Ratoran were all engaged at kindling a neid fire. Some of
the little boys said they got no school bread that day, as all the fires
had been put out. The school was at Pubble, near Ratoran, in
Tyrone.^^
Keatinsr tells us that " the festival of the fire of Tlachtofa was
held on the eve of Samhain (Hallow E'en)," and it was made
obligatory, under pain of punishment, to extinguish all the
fires of Erin on that eve, and the men of Erin were allowed to
kindle no other fire but that one, and all the other fires were to
be lighted from it. Keating further says that the meeting was
held " to make a sacrifice to all the gods which was burnt in
that fire." Cormac says nothing of any such sacrifice. The
wizards, no doubt, as part of their incantations, threw charms,
etc., into the fire, but there were no sacrifices of animals
or offerings of milk or bread or fruits, and there were no gods
then worshipped but the elements.
Keating further says it was their usage also to light two
fires to Bel in every district in Erin at this season, and to drive
a pair of each kind of cattle that the district contained
between those two fires, as a preservative to guard them
against all the diseases of the year. "It is from that fire, made
in honour of Bel, that the 1st of May is called Biltaini or
Bealtaine ; for Beltainni is the same as Beil-teine, i.e., teine
Bheil or Bel's fire." Bel is certainly the same as " bil," the good,
new, and pure fire.
There is no such celebration now on the 1st of May, but on
St. John's Eve (22nd of June), it is still the custom to light fires
and to go about amongst the cattle and strike them, especially
the cows and bulls, with lighted sheaves of wheaten straw
called " clears " (luminaria) to make them vigorous and
prolific.
It is generally supposed that the Church caused the fires of
Belteinne in Erin to be transferred from the 1st of May to the
eve of Midsummer, St. John's day, or June 23rd. We are
inclined to think that a ceremony of the kind was from old time
attached to the Summer Solstice.^^ This by no means
^ Kilkenny Archceol. Soc, 4th series vol. 6, p. 64.
^ The bulla were of old, as now, admitted to the herds at, or shortly before,
the Summer Solstice, with the view of having the calves born in the following
April when the grass is becoming plentiful.
194 EARLY lEISH HISTORY. ~
precludes us from assuming that there was a somewhat similar
function on the 1st of May. An old pastoral celebration of an
analogous kind was held on the foundation day of Rome, the
21st April, called the Palilia or Parilia, This was an external
manifestation of the old fire-cult. Fire was the principal god
of the Aryans — the religion of the heavenly light which
developed into Sun-worship. /
Ovid tells us how, when a boy, he jumped over the three
fires at this feast and gives the prayer which was to be repeated
four times by the shepherd while turning towards the rising
sun, and asking pardon for his innocent sins. " If I have
pastured my sheep on holy ground, or sat beneath a holy tree,
or if a sheep of mine has nibbled the grass from graves, or if I
have entered a forbidden grove I ask pardon." He then
prayed for the health of himself and his flock : —
Valeant hominesque gregesque,
Sitque salix aries, conceptaque semina conjux
Reddat ; et in stabulo multa sit agna meo.
The poet adds, " then across the blazing heaps of crackling
stalks throw with agile foot thy active frame." ^
The primitive house in which the fire was kept was pro-
bably a round hut made of wattled osiers daubed with mud.
The round form appears to have been preserved in the Greek
Prytaneum, and the Aedes Vestae in Rome. Fire was con-
sidered the purest of the Elements and Vesta the purest of
the gods, 25
In Pagan Rome " new fire " was kindled at the commence-
ment of the Pagan year.^^ Ovid tells us : —
Adde quod arcana fieri novus ignis in aede
Dicitur et vires flamma refecta capit.
And that " new fire " is said to be made in the inmost shrine
and the flame re-made is strens^thened.-^
The primitive way of producing this " new fire " was by the
^* Vesta, from whose altar the suffimcn of purification for the Feast was taken,
had no idol image. She was the Sacred fire itself of the hearth (fffr/rt), which was
also an altar.
Tw it dymmrw rwv OiCJv to Kada^rarov rS)v OvrirCiv (jnXov. —
Dio Halicar.
2^ This was at the commencement of the old year, he thinks : —
Nee mihi parva fides annos hinc esse priores. — Fast. III.,
2" G. F. Frazer, Jour. Phil., XIV., 145.— Plutarch Numa.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. 195
fire drill or stick and groove. Festus tells U8 that when the
fire of Vesta went out the use was to drill a piece of " lucky
wood '' until the fire was produced, which was then carried into
the shrine by a vestal in a brazen sieve.^^ The drilling evi-
dently took place outside in the full blaze of the sunshine ; the
fire was from the sun.
In the time of Plutarch another mode was sometimes or
perhaps usually adopted. " A new fire," he says, " must be
made (when the fire of Vesta went out) lighted from a pure and
undefiled ray from the aun, not from another fire. They
usually lighted it with basins, which they prepare hollowed with
the isosceles sides of a right-angled triangle, which bends the
rays to one point." The rays of light may be concentrated
either by refraction or reflection. In the former case they
must fall through a transparent refracting substance, as glass
formed into a proper shape ; in the latter they fall on a
concave polished substance of silvered glass or bright metal.^^
Plutarch refers to the latter mode. For the former mode
a convex lens of crystal and the speculum ustorium snad other
means were used.
After the reception of the Faith, pure elemental fire was
thought to possess a special sanctity. And it was not thought
amiss to appropriate the religious feelings connected with it,
when purified from superstition, to the uses of Christianity.
On some day in holy week — the usage varied — the lamps
,in the churches were in many places extinguished and the
Paschal candlestick was lighted from the " new fire." From
this source the other lights in the church were kindled, and
the various households in the parish took a flame to relight
their fires and lamps which had been carefully extinguished
beforehand.^
The famous fire of St. Bridget at Kildare is probably an
adaption to Christian uses of an old usage connected with
the prechristian Cult. There were two claen fertas (sloping
enclosures ?) ^^ at Tara, west of Rath Grainne, which lies
^Morem fuisse si quando ignis Veste extinctus esset tabulam felicis
tnaterise tain diu terebrare quousque exceptum ignem crebro seneo virgo in sedem
ferret.
2«Numa. C. IX.
*• Marlene, H., Antiq. (IV., 23), gives full and interesting details.
*' CtAen f epcA a njActcif Aiji'Dfie.
ClAen pefCA tiA ClAen-CAinsne.
196 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
on the summit of the western face of the hill and on its
abrupt slope. One of these fertas was in aftertime gener-
ally referred to as the place where the maidens were slain,
the other as the place where the erroneous judgment of Lugaid
Mac Con about the measure of damages for the trespass oi
sheep was delivered. " In the documenta Patriciana," Father
Hogan, S.J., says : — " We have the worn. fem. &ing. Fertoe,
gen. Fertas, dot. Ferti, ace. sing. Ferti. We get its form from
the words fossam rotundam in similitudinom fertse (p. 78) ;
and its gender from ad Ferte quam foderunt viri (p. 327).^^
The old word is not found in Windisch Zeuss or Stokes's
" Glossarial Index to the Feilire." Its meaning may be probably
followed thus: (1) a trench or dike with a bank or ditch on the
edge of it, on which a hedge might be planted, like an ordinary
farm fence ; (2) an enclosed area ; (3) when there was a
burial mound within it, a tomb ; (4) a Fearta Martar, where
the bones of Saints were laid ; (5) A miracle. The Ferta is
thus described in the Trip. Life (237) :— " It is thus Patrick
measured the Ferta, namely, seven score feet in the inclosure
(is indies), and seven and twenty feet in the great house
(is intig mor) and seventeen feet, in the kitchen, and seven
feet in the oratory, and in that wise it was he used to found
the church buildings (na Congahala) always."
The diameter of the Ferta alone is given, from which
Stokes rightly infers that the Ferta was circular. It seems
probable, we think, that Clonfert, Ardfert, etc., were named
from Congahala of this kind, made like the Ferta of the Saint.
So in describing the tomb of Laoghaire's daughters, near
the Well of Clebach, it is stated, " They made a round trench
(fossam) in likeness to a Ferta, for the Gael and the heathens
used to do so. But by us it is called, relic, i.e., reliquioe and
feart. And the (Ferta) was consecrated to God and Patrick,
with the bones of Saints, and to his successors, for ever. And
he made a church of earth in that place (et ecclesiam terrenam
fecit in loco).''^^
This means, probably as we understand it, that he made
within the Ferta a little seven-foot oratory, as above mentioned.
82 Ir. Ecd. Rev. Liber Angueli, vol. vii., 3rd series (1886), 852.
In the Urkeltischer SprachscAaiz (Fick), vol. ii., 271, Fert is referred to the
root, ver., verto, meaning to enclose or cover.
S3 Doc. Patrie, 73, Trip. Life, 317.
See also Reeves' Chtirches of Armagh, 49. I
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. 197
It is, perhaps, permissible to suggest that St. Bridget's fire
was kept in a Ferta of this kind, and that the Ferta on the
slope of Tara, where the maidens were slain, was used in con-
nection with the cultus of fire.^*
" The fire," says Giraldus, " is surrounded by a hedge of thorn, or
some kind of brushwood (virgeo quodam saepe), forming a circle within
which no male can enter ; and if any one should presume to enter, which
has been sometimes attempted by rash men, he will not escape the
divine vengeance. Moreover, it is lawful for women in blowing the fire
to use only a bellows or a fan, but not their mouths. In the time of St.
Brigid there were twenty nuns, she herself being one. After her death
nineteen have always formed the community, the number having never
been increased. Each of them has tlie care of the fire for a single night
in turn, and on the evening before the twentieth night, the last nun,
having heaped wood upon the fire, says : — ' Brigid, mind your fire. This
is your night,' and so she leaves the fire, and in the morning the usual
quantity of wood having been consumed, the fire is found still burn-
ing." ^5 It was an ashless fire. It was, we suppose, in a cell or oratory,
and not in the open air, though Giraldus makes no mentiom of any
building within the enclosure.
This fire was kept continually lighting from the time of St. Brigid,
until it was extinguished by the order of Henry of London, in 1220, " to
take away all occasion of superstition." It was, however, rekindled and
kept lighting till the time of Henry VIII. There is no statement that
it was ever kindled from the teine-eigin, or ever put out and rekindled
It was, however J in the precinct of the monastery in a sacred enclosure,
surrounded by a hedge, which no male might enter. It was customary
in pagan times to surround places struck with lightning with a hedge,
and Apuleius speaks of such a place as " locus spepimine consecratus,"
a place consecrated with a hedge. It was near the famous oak that gave
a name to the spot — cill-dara, the church of the oak. The author of
the 4th Life of St. Brigid tells us : " For there was there a very tall
oak tree, which St. Brigid greatly cherished, and she blessed it. The
trunk (stipes) of it remains there still, and no one will dare to cut a bit
from it with knife or hatchet (ferro). But if anyone can break a bit off
with his hand, he counts it a treasure." ^^
Giraldus often visited Kildare, where he saw the " marvellous Book of
Kildare," since lost, " containing the Four Gospels, according to St.
Jerome, every page illustrated by drawings, illuminated with a variety
of brilliant colours. . . The more often and closely I scrutinize them,
^ The Four Masters mention a ■pe]icA caoiiac. Was this an enclosure for
folding sheep or, as O'Donovan suggests, a place in which there was a great
mortality and a grave of sheep ? Tigernach has Cerhan escop o Ferta Cerhnin
mortuus est. Was this the grave of Ccrban, or a ferta after the manner of Ht.
Patrick, founded by him ? — Rev. Celt., xvii.,125.
*' Erigitla custodi ignem tuum. Te enim nox ista contingih.
^^ QiiercuH enim altissima ibi erat quam multum S. Brigida diligcbat et bene-
dixit eam, cujus stipes adhuo manet et nemo ferro abscindere audet et pro maguu
nmnere habet, si qui potest frangere manibupi aliquid inde. — Colgan, SS.. Vol. It,,
p. 660.
198 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
the more I am surprised, and find them always new, discovering fresh
causes for increased admiration." '^
In the worship of Mithra and the Avesta-liturgy, there
were psalmodic prayers before the altar of fire. The
worshipper held a bundle of sacred twigs (boresman), in his
hand, offerings of milk, oil and honey were made, and strict
precautions taken lest the breath of the officiating priest
should contaminate the divine flame.^^
The Galtchas of Ferghana, according to M. de UfFalvy, are
so reverential that they would not blow out a light lest they
should render the flame impure with their breath ; so the
inhabitants of Badakshon and Bokhara.
The Bollandists, after citing Giraldus textually, add : —
As to the religious motive for which the nuns kept the fire of
St. Brigid, as has been stated, we have often read in the lives of the
Irish Saints, that the tire consecrated specially by the bishop on the
night of Easter, used to be carefully kept for the whole year as wa shall
tell in the life of St. Kieran (March 5) — Or the fire was elicited from
heaven by the prayer of some Saint, as may be seen in the life of St.
Kevin. From one or other of these causes the ritual usages (ritus) of
the nuns at Kildare appear to have been derived.^^
At Seir the fire consecrated by the Saint at Easter, from
which all the fires in the place were lighted every day, was
once wantonly put out by the boy Cichridug. St, Kieran said
there should be no fire again until the following Easter unless
it were sent from heaven. The monks and their guests were
shivering with the cold. Then the saint, by prayer, got a
ball of fire from heaven by miracle.
This fire was probably obtained by the use of the ustoriutn
speculum (burning glass).
Flint and steel with tinder were used for striking and
kindling fire. Brendan struck fire from flint (silice ferro per-
cusso) to cook his fish. This apparatus was called CenlAC
Ceinet), and was carried in the "girdle pocket." Hence Ueine-
Cfe^jM, girdle fire. Tinder was called "sponc," and was made
from dried leaves of coltsfoot, and later of coarse brown paper
steeped in a solution of nitre and dried. Pope Zacharias,
writing to St. Boniface, says " The Irish kindled great fires at
nightfall on Easter Eve from flints.'
/
" Top. Hib. Dis. ir., c. 38.
55 The Mt^derks of Mi:h)-a, 23, by Ciiinoiit, F.
^ 13oU.. Ada, SS. (1857), Vol. i, p. 114, Vol. 7, p. 393.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. 199
We have very little doubt that the Aryan fire-cult had a
place side by side with the worship of the sun and the other
elements in Erin, and that our texts were carefully " cleaned "
from any reference to it. The fire was probably kept at first in
the King's great house, in the women's quarters, and attended to
by the maidens of the King's household. There was, no
doubt, an altar with representations or " idols " of the sun
(kjiumi) there, whence it came to be known as the " grin nan." ^'^
The fire was afterwards kept in the maidens' ferta. on the
slope, in a shrine within it, or if not kept there constantly, was
placed there for great celebrations. The most important of
these would be the making of the " new fire '' from the sun
itself, and we may presume that it was on such an occasion the
maidens were assembled who were slain by the raiders from
Leinster*!
*" la some parts of the Highlands almost up to the present day an enclosure
or paddock was called a grianan. Bannock's Irish Druids, 192, and infra, c. 10,
the " grianan " of Ailcach, iu the Circuit of Muircherlad of the Leather Cloaks.
■*!" Lynch," says Potrie, who does not dissent, "was of opinion that tlie
maidens were Vodtals." We are unable to go that length.
[ 200 ]
CHAPTER XIII.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE ST. PATRICK. — IL
''PHE Druids now claim our attention. The word Druid
1 (drai, gen., driiad) is, probably, connected with the root
"dru," a tree, which in "^pDe" afterwards came to signify
an oak in Greek. The earliest oracle in Greece was in
Dodona, in Epirus, where there was an oracular oak tree
which Odysseus went to consult.
'E(c ?pwoc v\f/iK6iJoio Atoc BovXj^j' IwaKoviTai.
" From the tree with lofty leafage Zeus's will to hear." —
Od. XIV., 327.
The tree was the (pvyoc, an oak tree, bearing an esculent
acorn, and the rustling of the leaves was believed to be the
whispering of the tree god, who was subsequently absorbed
into the anthropomorphic Zeus. Pausanias says it was the
eldest tree in Hellas, except the Xwyoc, within the sanctuary of
Hera, at Samos.^ The olive on the Acropolis, the olive at
Delos, the laurel of the Syrians, and the plane tree of Menelaus,
in Arcadia, came next in order. In Erin the trees of enchant-
ment were the rowan, quicken, or mountain ash, the hazel,
the yew, and the blackthorn. The oak, as a magic wood is, we
believe, not mentioned in our texts. There was no cutting
of the mistletoe by moonlight, as in Gaul. Draoidheacht
(Druidism) now means enchantment. It meant originally
" wizardry" in all its forms. Before the coming of St. Patrick
we find, within or beside the class of Druids, the file, the bard,
and the brehon. The brehon was a judge ; the file was a poet-
philosopher; and the bards occupied a subordinate position,
and were in the main roving minstrels and reciters of the lays
of love and war. They congregated in troops, and in the
course of time became a public nuisance.
iPaws. viii. 23. Frazer, I., 401.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. — II. 201
As the brebon, the file, and the bard emerged from the
Druids the latter became in the main soothsayers and charin
workers. They used to be consulted as to the success of
expeditions, as by Cormac MacArt, Dathi and others, as far
back as the Tain. Then they took auguries, caused mists and
■winds, etc., by magic, and observed the flight of birds, the
passage of clouds, and the movements of the stars.
In the De Divinatione, Cicero, addressing his brother
Quintus, says: —
The barbarous nations even do not neglect this art of divination.
Take for instance the Druids in Gaul, with one of whom Divitiacus,
the Aeduan, your host and admirer, I was acquainted. He professed to
have a knowledge of natural science, which the Greeks call physiology,
and partly by auguries, and partly by soothsaying (conjectura) used to
predict what was going to happen. "^
An earlier account by Timagenes is preserved for us by
Ammianus Marcellinus, who tells us that Timagenes was a
Greek by language and erudition (diligentia), and had collected
from many books facts which had remained unknown for a
long time.
" Throughout the provinces of Gaul," Ammianus con-
tinues : —
The people gradually becoming civilized, the study of liberal
accomplishments flourished, having been first introduced by the bards,
the euhages, and the Druids. The bards used to sing in heroic verse
to the sweet sounds of the harp (lyra) the brave deeds of famous men ;
the euhages searched closely into the forces and powers of nature, and
attempted to expound them. Amongst them the Druids, men with
loftier minds, and bound together in associations of fellowship
according to the teaching of Pythagoras, ascended to speculation on
things high and hidden, and looking down on what was temporal, pro
claimed that the soul was immortal.^
There is an undertone of the rhetorician Timagenes in this,
especially at the conclusion, but it presents to us a picture sub-
^ Siquidem et in Gallia Druidre sunt e quibus ipse Divitiacum y5i]duum cognovi,
qui et iialurte rationem quam divaioXoyiav Orteci appellant, uotam esse sibi profite.
batur, et partim auguriis partim conjectura, quaj essent futura dicebat. —
De Div. I. 41.
* Et bardi quidem fortia virorum illustrium facta heroicis composita versibus,
cum dulcibus lyroe modulis cantitarunt, euhages vero scrutaiites serio vim
et sublimia naturte pandere conabantur ; intereos druidfe ingeniis celsiores ut
auctoritas Pytliagorae decrevit, sodaliciis adstricti consortiis, questionibus occul-
tarum rerura altarumque erecti sunt, et despectantes humana pronuutiarunt
animas immortales
Eahagea = vates, soothsayers (?), Ammian. Marcel, XV., g. 2, Ed. Eisscnhardt,
202 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
stantially the same as our texts present. The Druid is still a
wizard. When we meet him in the text of Caesar, which we
shall quote, we shall find that he has changed his character and
status completely. He has become a sacrificing priest and a
person of the highest political importance, and has acquired a
status and a position which he never attained in Erin. Amongst
the Aedui, for instance, according to usage (ex more), the
Druids elected Convictolitavis, chieftain, in the case of a dis-
puted succession — a choice which Csesar found it prudent to
ratify, *
M. Bertrand is not quite satisfied with the account Csesar
gives of Druidism in Gaul, and says his statements require to
be taken with some reserve. This may be so, but the main
outlines of his description, which is all that we are concerned
with, are undoubtedly true, and we have no other evidence
equally trustworthy to rely on. There is no mention of lerne
or Hibernia in any classical text in connection with Druidism.
Csesar says it was supposed that the system (disciplina)came
originally from Britain, and that many still went there (he
does not name any place in Britain) to study the teaching more
carefully. Tacitus refers very briefly to the Druids of Mona
(Anglesea) in describing the attack on that place in A. D. 61.
" On the shore of Mona stood the opposing army with its dense
array of armed warriors, while between the ranks dashed women
in black attire like the Furies, with hair dishevelled, waving
lighted torches. All around the Druids, lifting up their hands
to heaven and pouring forth dreadful imprecations, scared our
soldiers, . . . Their groves, devoted to cruel superstitions,
were cut down. For they thought it rightful to cover their
altars with the blood of captives and to consult their gods
through the entrails of men." ^
This statement is highly coloured, and must be received
with great reserve. The inforoiation did not reach Tacitus
from Agricola, who had left Britain long before.
We shall now give somewhat fully (in translation) the
statement contained in the 6th Book of the Gallic V/ar.
In all Gaul (writes Ctesar) there are two classes of persons only
who are held in any consideration or honour — for the common folic
are reckoned almost as slaves. The Druids are one class, the knights
♦ B. G., VII., 33. OAnn., XIV., 30.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK — II. 203
(warriors) the other. The former attend to religious matters, provide for
sacrifices, public and private, and expound questions touching religious
obligations and rites. All the Druids have one president, who has the
greatest authority among them. On his death, if one is pre-eminent in
worth he succeeds ; if several are equal they contend for the presidency
by the vote of the Druids, and sometimes even by fighting. The
Druids abstain from war and pay no taxes. The main belief they wish
to inculcate is that souls do not perish, but pass after death from one
body to another, and they think this the greatest incentive to valour,
as it leads man to despise death. They discourse much also concerning
the heavenly bodies and their movements, the size of the earth and
the universe, and the attributes and power of the immortal gods, and
impart their lore to the young. The whole nation is addicted to super-
stition, and for that reason, those who are afflicted with severe illness, or
who are engaged in war, or exposed to danger, either sacrifice human
beings as victims, or vow that they will do so, and employ the Druids to
carry out these sacrifices. For they think that unless the life of man
be rendered, the mind (numen) of the immortal gods cannot be appeased.
They have also sacrifices of the same sort as public institutions. A little
before our own time, slaves and retainers, of whom the deceased
were known to have been fond used to be burned along with them
when a funeral was held with full rites. It is the god Mercury they
chiefly worship ; of him there are most images. Next to him they
worship Apollo, Mars, Jupiter and Minerva.
The Germans differ greatly from these habits. For they have no
Druids to preside at divine tvorship, nor do they practise (student) sacri-
fices. They recognize as gods only those whom they see and by vjhose aid
they are manifestly assisted, naraely, the Sun, Fire ( Vulcanum), and the
Moon ; the rest they have not even heard of.^
What Caesar says of the Germans was true of the Gael ;
the religious customs or superstitions of both were Nordic.
There is a silly story to be found in our texts of a young girl
being fed on human flesh to make her ripe for marriage at an
earlier age, a dietary which had the desired result ! It is the
only mention made of such a practice, and Keating acutely
enough observes, that if there were any others they would not
have been concealed. There is, in like manner, only a single
instance recorded of what is supposed to be human sacrifice, if
we except the Semitic Cult already dealt with.
A poem in the " Dindsenchus " says that St. Patrick, in the
Fair of Tailtin, preached against the three bloods : —
Yoke oxen and slaying milch cows,
And also by him the burning of the first born (primect).
It has been suggested that "primect" applies to human
6 B.G. VI. 13 to 22.
204 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
beings. We cannot think so. The poet would not have placed
them after cows and oxen. It clearly means calves and first
fruits (primitise). Moreover, if the poet, writing several centuries
afterwards, supposed that children were sacrificed in Erin in
the time of St. Patrick, it would show his ignorance but not
prove the facts.'^
The burial alive of 50 hostages round the tomb of Fiachra,
the son of Eocaid Muigmeadoin, is recorded in the Book of
Leinster, and the Book of Ballymote : — Fiachra, and Aillil
his brother, went into Munster to lift pledges, and went with a
large army. A battle was fought, in which they were victo-
rious, but Fiachra was wounded. On his way back to Tara
with 50 hostages and large booty, he died of his wounds at
Forrach, in Westmeath. His grave was dug, his lamentation
rites performed, and his name written in Ogham. " After which^
in order that it might be perpetually for a reproach to Munster,
and a fitting matter with which to taunt them, round about
Fiachra's grave the pledges whom they had brought out of the
south were buried and they alive.'' — B. B. The Book of Leinster
records that — " Fifty pledges that Eocaid's sons brought back
out of the west, it was at a month's end after the battle that
Fiachra was dead, and it was around the king's grave that the
pledges were buried alive. "^
The Book of Lecan presents the matter in a diff'erent way,
and states that the hostages fell on Fiachra unawares, and
buried him alive {i.e., attempted to do so, we suppose). In any
case it was not a sacrifice. It was punishment for attempting
to kill Fiachra and escape ; or revenge for his death from the
wounds he had received fighting against Munster; or revenge
accompanied with insult.^ In several parts of Gaul, and some
parts of Germany, before the Roman Conquest, human sacri-
fices were very popular, and commonly practised. These were
sacrifices proper — religious functions publicly conducted accord-
ing to a fixed ritual, by priests. There is no pretence for
saying that there was ever anything of the kind in Erin, except
» Sullivau, M. and C, Vol. I., DCXLI.
^ Silva Gaedelioa, Vol. 2, p. 377 and 543. UoclAi-oeT) A Lechc ■] iioL^xejet) a
f eAfic "] ^toliA-otiA-oh ACluicbe |cAeinLech ■] Uo-ScinbA-oh a Ainm OsAitn. O'Grady
does not follow tliis text., which appears to be ct)rrupt, Vol. 1., 334. Professor
biiUivan translates — lii.^ Lcacht was made, and his Fert was raised, axid bis
Cluicbe Caeulech was ignited.— M. and C, Vol. I., p. 320.
9 O'Donovan, Hy Fiacrach, 345.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. — II. 205
the Semitic use, as we already stated (c. 2), neither Druids nor
priests are named in the III Brechta, or Law of Colours.
There is no evidence to support the view that Druidism
passed originally from Britain into Gaul. Druidism as a system
of wizardry is a phase in the evolution of thought and cult, and
we find nothing to support the view that in Cfesar's time it had
got beyond that phase in Britain ; and if students went to
Britain, we suspect it was to perfect themselves in charm-
working and fortune-telling. It may be confidently asserted
tliat there never existed in Britain an organization such as we
find described in the Commentaries. If it existed, it would
have been specifically mentioned by Csesar or by Tacitus. Its
political importance would have arrested the attention of the
former ; the latter would have been curious to ascertain what
views they held about the immortality of the souls of great men —
the " magnse animse " of Agricola. And even if the statements
as to the practices in Mona were well founded, which we do
not admit, no inference could be safely drawn from what was
done in an isolated locality, and probably by a racial remnant,
as to the religion or religions of Britain in general, which was
even then, we believe, largely occupied by men of the Nordic
stock — e.g., the Belgae and others— and in particular by the
powerful nation of the Brigantes, who were the people whom
Agricola found to resemble the Gael so closely in national
customs and intellectual characteristics.
We find in the Leabar na h-uidhre,an old text.i" the "Senchus
na relec," from which it may be inferred that the conception of
Monotheism, if not of Christianity, had reached Erin some
centuries before the coming of St. Patrick. Our translation is
founded on that of Petrie : —
" A groat king of great judgment assumed the sovereignity of Erin
i. e., Cor mac, son of Art, son of Conn of the Hundred Battles, Erin
was prosperous in his time, because just judgments were distributed
throughout by him ; so that no one durst attempt to wound a man in
Erin during the short jubilee of seven years, for Cormac had the faith
of the one True God according to the law ; for he said that he would
not adore stones or trees, but that he would adore Him who had made
them and who was a power behind all the elements ^^ (ro po comsid
ar cul na oli dula), the one strong, powerful God who formed the
" Facsimile, p. 50.
" Petrie has " had power over oZZ the elements." This, we think, misses the
point, namely, that the power was arcul behind the elements.
20b EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
dements, it is on Him he would believe. And he was the third person
who had believed in Erin before the arrival of Patrick. Concobar
Mac Nessa, to whom Altus had told concernine; the passion of Christ;
Moran, the son of Cairbre Cinnceat {i. e., Mac INlain), the second man ;
Cormac the third ; and it is probable that others went on their road as
to this belief. And his eye was destroyed by Oengus Gaibhuaiphnech,
and he resided afterwards at the house at Cletech (on the Boyne^, for it
was not lawful for a king with a personal blemish to reside at Tara. In
the second year after the injuring of his eye he came by his death at
Cletechj the bone of a salmon having stuck in his throat.^^ _^nd he
told his people not to bury him at Brugh, as it was a cemetery of
idolaters, but to bury him at Ros na Righ with his face to the east.
He afterwards died, and his servants of trust held a council and
resolved to bury him at Brugh, the place whei-e the kings of Tara, his
predecessors, were buried. ^^ The body of the king was afterwards lifted
up to be carried to Brugh and the Boyne (was) on the bank (i tleacht)
high up so that they could not come. So they took heed that it was
unjust to override the decision of the prince, to override the last will of
a king."i*
The Four Masters state the circumstances attending Cormac's
death as follows :
"A. D., 266, the bone of a salmon sticking in his threaten account
of the siabhradh (genii), whom Maeilghean, the Druid, incited at him
after Cormac had turned against them on account of his adoration of
the True God in preference to them. Wherefore a devil attacked him
^t the instigation of the Druids, and gave him a painful death."
The expression " according to the law " (do reir rechta),
seems to indicate that Cormac was a monotheist awaiting the
coming of Christianity. Recht is Faithae are the usual words
for the Law and the Prophets, and if the tradition was that
Cormac had received baptism it would have been clearly
stated. In the evolution of Aryan thought a time was sure to
3ome when the " power behind the elements" would be dis-
severed and a system of either polytheism or monotheism
would be introduced. It is not unreasonable to suppose that
some knowledge of the teaching of Christ, derived from captives
^' H. 3, 17, Trin. Coll., has " in addition." or it was the Siabhra that killed
him, i.e., the Tuatha De Dananns, for they wex'e called Siahkras,
^^ Petrie, Hound Toiuers, p. 99.
^* About two miles below Slane the Boyne becomes fordable, and there are
seve;al islets. On the south bank is Ross-ua-Righ — the Headland of the King ;
on the northern bank, in the curve of the river, southwards, where stand Knowth,
Dowth and New Grange, was the Brugh-na-Boine, according to the generally
received opinion. A mound recently levelled was pointed out as the grave of
Cormac, " adjoining a pagan burial place, where human bones ave found scattered
about and bones of great size have been d^ig up." — E. Hogan, S.J., Cath Ruis-na-
Rig for Boinn, p. vi.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK. — II. 207
and from traders and dealers, would have given the movement
we have indicated a monotheistic impulse, preparing the way
for the Gospel message.
We have already seen that there were Christians in Erin
before the mission of our Apostle. Palladius was sent to
" believers," and the Confession states that many (" so many ")
thousand captives, who were not obedient to their priests, were
sold into Erin like the Saint himself. It is only reasonable to
suppose that the example and teaching of these missionaries
scattered through the land must have borne fruit. There is
further a very striking piece of evidence which has hitherto,
strangely enough, remained unnoticed, and which we regard as
worthy of very attentive consideration. In the Tirechan text
we find an account of the Saint's second visit to Laoghaire, at
Tara, as follows : —
And St. Patrick went again to the city of Tara to Loaghaire, the
son of Neill, because he had made a corupaot with him that he should
not be killed in his kingdom ; but he could not believe, saying — " My
father Niall did not permit me to believe, but (wished) that I should
be buried on the ramparts of Tara, as if antagonists (viris) were halting
in battle. The son of Niall (on the ramparts of Tara) and the son of
Dimlang in Maiston (Mullaghmast) in the Plain of Liffey, for the lasting
of hate as it is. For the heathen used to be buried in their sepulchres
armed, with weapons ready, face to face (with the foe) until the day of
Erdathe, " as the Magi call it, that ia the day of judgment of the
Lord." 15
The writer evidently means the day of resurrection ; the
grave is frequently referred to in our texts as the place of
resurrection, " The body of Laoghaire was, according to an
account in the Leabar na h-uidhre '^^ brought from the south
and interred, with his armour of valour, on the south-west of
^^ Perrexitque ad civitatim Tomro ad Loigarium filium Neil iterum, quia
apud ilium fcedus pepigit ut non occideietur in regno illius ; sed non potuit credere,
dicens. " Nam Neel pater meus non sinwit mihi credere, sed ut sepeliar in cacuminibus
Temro, quasi viris consistentihiis in hello," quia utuntur Gentiles in sepulchris armati
proniptis armis facie ad faciem usque ad diem Erdathe apud magos id est judicii
diem Domini "Egojilius Neil (incacuminibus Temro) et filius Dualinge im Maistim in
campo Liphi pro duritate odii ut est hoc." Ut est hoc is a Gaelicism, moti aca f e, as it is,
"We think it right as the text is very important to give an alternative translation
by Todd. " For Niall, mj' father, did not permit me to believe, but (commanded)
that I should be buried in the ramparts of Tara (in cacuminibus Temro) as men
stand up in battle for the Gentiles are wont, etc. . . I the son of Nial (must be
buried after this fashion as the son of Dunlaing (was buried) at Msestin in the
Plain of Liffey, because of the endurance of our hatred.'' — Todd, p. 438, 34a.
Eogain Bell, a Christian King of Connacht, ordered that lie should be buried in
bis armour, which order was carried out after his death in A.D. 521. 0'Donov*n
Hy. Fiach, 472.
208 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
the outer ramparb of the Royal Rath of Laoghaire at Tara,
with his face turned southwards on the men of Leinster as
fighting with them, for he was the enemy of the Leinster men
in his lifetime." He was killed by the sun and the wind, etc.,
after a reign of thirty years, in A.D. 458.
The passage is important for two reasons. In the first
place it suggests that in the lifetime of Niall (-f 406)
Christianity had not only reached Erin, but had made a lodg-
ment within the precincts of Tara. Who was inducing
Laoghaire to " believe" ? Was it some captive Bertha or Clotildo
about whom our texts are silent ? In the next place it pre-
pares us for the statement of Muirchu, who tells us that
Laoghaire, having reconsidered the matter announced that he
had come to the conclusion that it was " better to believe than
perish," and accepted the Faith. This news we may remark
would quickly reach Rome and Prosper of Acquitaine. It is
suggested that his implacable hate prevented his conversion.
We do not think the objection valid. If St. Patrick insisted on
every Gael giving up ex corde his tribal antipathies before
admitting him to the laver of baptism we suspect he would
have had a very small congregation. Even nowadays there
are very many sound haters who think themselves, and are
generally considered, to be tolerably perfect Christians. Nor need
the fact of his taking the pagan oath two years and a half
before his death under stress of circumstances in order that he
might be released from captivity, make any difficulty. The
weight to be attached to the taking of the pagan oath is greatly
overbalanced in our judgment by the fact that he broke it very
soon afterwards, not having before his eyes the fear of the sun
and the moon and the wind.
We may not omit to mention here a curious old prophecy
referred to by Muirchu, and given in a Latin version and also in
a Gaelic version, which latter, however, was inadvertently
omitted by the scribe in the text which has reached us. It
shows the alarm of the wizards before the coming of the Saint,
which was, no doubt, caused by the success of the humble
efibrts which preceded his apostolate. Laoghaire had prophets
and soothsayers who were able to foretell the future by their
^^ Leabar na h-uidhre, text printed in Petrie, Tara, 146-
" ni c«c immotto a |tAtA 'oi ofo — Ibidem.
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFORE SAINT PATRICK.— II. 209
evil arts. Two of those wizards often declared that a foreign
worship, destined to exercise great power, together with a
certain hurtful teaching, would be introduced from over sea
from afar ; a religion which would be taught by few, received
by many, and honoured by all, and would overthrow king-
doms. They pointed out the bringer of this teaching in a sort
of verse, often repeated by them, especially two or three years
before the coming of the Saint, which can be expressed more
clearly in Gaelic than in Latin : —
CiepA CAilchenn caji m«i|i mei|tcenn,
A bjiAch colchenn, a ch|iAnn ctiotnchenn,
A tniAf in Ai|tcbiuti A cije
■p^iifSenAc A muince[i tiiLe
^men, Amen.
Axehead will come over a furious (?) sea,
His mantle (chasuble) head-holed, his staif crook-headed,
His paten (altar) in the east of the house,
All his people shall answer
Amen. Amen.
When these things come to pass, our Kingdom, which is heathen,
will not stand, ^s
" Axehead," refers to the form of the tonsure which, we may
observe, cannot have been the Druidical tonsure, if there was
such, as in that case it would not have been distinctive. To
describe it roughly, the Gaelic tonsure was half a circle,
extending from a line drawn from ear to ear at the back, but
confined to the top of the head, the circular part lying front-
wise, having a fringe of hair all around it.
A good deal has been written on the form of the
Celtic, or, as we prefer to call it, Gaelic tonsure. In oui
judgment, Bishop Dowden is perfectly right in his conten-
tion that the front part of the head was not completely
shaved, as some urge, but that there was a fringe of hair
left to mark the outline of the semi-circle. "It is plain,"
he observes, " that if the whole of the hair on the front of the
head was shaved off there would be nothing resemblinj? a
'8 Muirchu gives Asciput as the Latin equivalent for tailchenn, and this is
usually translated adzehead ; we suggesit that axeliead is the bettor meaning,
having regard to the form of the tonsure, which, assuming tliat there was a frontal
fringe, would correspond fairly enough with the shape of an axe, but would not
correspond at all with the shape of an adze. Ascia, an axe for hewing wood ; a
carpeutei's axe. — Lewis and Short, mhvocf- 'Trip. Life, 274.
P
210 EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
corona of hair," ^9 We add further, that in that case their would
be nothinsf reseinblincr an axehead, whereas with the frinff>
the resemblance of the shorn crown to an axehead is striking.
The bishop adds : —
" The passage in Abbot Ceolfrid's letter to Naiton, King of the Picts
(A.D. 710), preserved by Bede, seems very distinctly to say that viewed
in front there seemed to be a crown, but that when you looked at the
back of the head you discovered that what you thought you saw was
cut short, was not a real and complete crown."
The words in Bede we translate : —
" Which (tonsure) to look at on the surface of the forehead is seen to
present the appearance of a crown, but when you arrrive at the back
of the neck examining it you will find what you thought was a crown
is cut short," ^^
We understand this to mean that the circle is not com-
pleted ; it is roughly a semi-circle instead of a whole circle.
Ceolfrid says the complete circle was necessary to represent
the crown. But this is not so. The Grown of Thorns, which
the tonsure symbolized, is represented by Correggio, in the
" Ecce Homo," as an incomplete circle, and is not widely
different from the Gaelic tonsure.
Another passage in the same letter is even more decisive.
Ceolfrid tells us that when Adamnan visited him he said to
him : — " I beseech you, holy brother, who believest that thou
art going to the crown of a life that has no end why, in a
fashion contrary to your belief, you bear the form of a crown
that has an end." ^^ This can only mean that the coronal circle
did not go round, but was ended before the circle was complete.
So much for the form of the Gaelic tonsure. Another aspect
of the question will engage our attention later on.
We do not propose to enter here into the " Pelagian contro-
versey " raised by Zimmer, All scholars are now of one mind
that his assumptions are bold to the verge of rashness, and his
inferences hasty and ill-considered. In addition to what we
have already written we shall confine ourselves to quoting the
*^ Celtic Church in Scotland. Dowden, J., Bishop of Edinburgh, p. 242.
^""Quae (tonsura) aspectu in frontis quidoin superiicie coroaae videtur
speciem praeferre ; sed ubi ad ceivicem cousidenmdo perveneris decurtatem earn
quam te videre putebus iuvenies coronam." — Bede, V. 21.
^^ Obseero, sancte frater qui ad coronam te vitae quae terminum nesciat
tendero credis, quid contrario tuae fidei habitu terminataui in capite coronuo
maginein portas ?
THE RELIGION OF THE GAEL BEFOUE SAINT PATRICK. — II. 211
following passage from Professor Bury. Referring to " The
Celtic Church in Great Britain and Ireland," he observes : —
" The most striking part of the sketch is the new theory of Patrick,
whose Confession, once waived aside by the author as spurious, is, alon.'
with the missive to Coroticus, emphatically admitted as authentic. It
is impossible here to criticise the theory which is worked out with seduc-
tive ingenuity, or I should have to raise the whole Patrician question ;
but I may just say that Professor Zimmer's theory seems to me to have
two radical defects. It does not account for the facts, and it is not
based on an adequate study of the sources." ^
The Church had not as yet defined its teachings on the points
involved, and there were many phases of Pelagianism before it
crystallised into the formal heresy we have already given in out-
line. It is possible, nay, probable, that some of the views held
by Pelagius, or which were attributed to him by adversaries
with a keen yZa-ir for heresy, or by followers who were, so to say,
more royal than the king, had reached and were disturbing
the little Church in Erin. The fact that Palladius was sent
to the believers indicates that Rome thought there was at
least a case for inquiry, possibly danger ahead against which it
would be prudent to take precautions. And further, consider-
ations of this kind may have entered into the motives which
induced our Apostle in his old age to write his profession and
testimony. We shall not. however, pursue the matter further.
An essay on the aberrations of a great scholar in a field of
knowledge which he had not made adequately his own would
be distasteful writing and unprofitable reading.
'-i-^Eng Hist Rev XlX. (1893>, 534, and see Articles by Dr. M'Carthy,
Sec. Rec. XIV., and Malone Eccl. Rec. XII.
I 212 3
CHAPTER XIV
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM.
IN olden time, before the rise of Chancery and Equity, the
laws of England were divided into two branches — the Com-
Dion Law and the Statute Law. The Common Law was the
common custom of the realm, handed down by tradition from
immemorial time, and reposing securely in the breasts
of the judges. In the same way the tribal customs in
Erin were the common law for each tribe, and remained un-
written until after the reception of the faith. Afterwards some
parts of this customary law were reduced to writing — those
parts, as it appears to us, which from their great detail and
enumeration of minute particulars, could not be entrusted
safely to the keeping of the most tenacious memory. This,
however, was not done officially. There was no codification of
the customs, no digest, no work — official or non-official — giving
a completed view, even in outline, of the civil and criminal
jurisprudence of the country.
Spenser, in his View of the State of Ireland (1595), describes
the Brehon Laws as " a rule of right, unwritten, but delivered
by tradition from one to another, in which oftentimes there
appeareth a great share of equity in determining the right between
party and party ; but in many things repugning both to God
and man — e.g., compensation for murder — the eric fine, by
which vile law many murders amongst them are made up and
smothered." ^
'• The original Brehon Text," observ^es Richey, one of the
editors, " consists altogether of curt and proverbial expressions
which rarely attempt the completeness of a sentence, and are
strung together without any attempt at logical or grammatical
connexion. The words are written without stop or accent,
continuously, without break. A Brehon judge, reading a pas-
^ The BrehonB delivered judgment from commentaries and maxims {\\oyc&\xi\\)
•J FAr<M5ito) Stokes' Corm. Glo^ss. Fasach, 76.
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 213
sfige for the first time, would find it difilcnlt to understand it.
The customary rules, to be found in the text, rarely atibrd re-
liable information. They are intended to serve as catchwords,
to assist the memory, to recall what had been previously com-
municated, generally in a rhythmical form, always in language
condensed and antiquated. They assume the character of
abrupt and sententious proverbs, the drift of which can only
be vaguely guessed at. Collections of such sayings are to be
found scattered through the Brehon Law Tracts." ^
There is no treatise on any part of the customary law pur-
porting on the face of it to be written by a Brehon, stating,
as was usual in such case, the name of the author and the place
and cause of writing.
There is a legend that all those customs were submitted to
St. Patrick, and that they were then purified and reduced to
writing. No such body of laws has reached us, and there is
no sound reason for believing that any such ever came into
existence. The texts which have reached us are known as the
Brehon Law Tracts, and all the important ones have, we
believe, been published in the five volumes of the Ancient
Laivs of Ireland, issued in the Rolls Series. These tracts
may be divided into two parts. The first part is contained
in vols, i., ii., iii. (1-79) of the Rolls Series, and comprises
(1) The Law of Distress ; (2) Hostage, Sureties ; (3)
Fosterage ; (4) Saer Stock ; (5) Daer Stock ; (G) Social Con-
nexions ; and (7) The Corns Bescna.
These constitute the Senchus Mor (Shanahus More) or great
old tradition, and are preceded by some marvellous prefaces in
which we are told by one editor that Cormac MacNessa was
Ard Righ of Erin, and by another that in the reign of Cormac
MacCuelennain " there was an opportunity for establishing
legislative authority, or the enactment of laws."
Distress is a legal term with which we are familiar
in the law of landlord and tenant. It means the
seizure and detention of goods and chattels. Procedure
to enforce a demand commenced, according to Gaelic
custom, with the seizure and detention of the defendant's
goods. The object of this was to compel him to satisfy
the claim, or else to go voluntarily before the brehon to
"^Ancient Lau:s, Vol. iv., p. x. — and see L'histoire traditionille de xU- tables
Melanges, Chaopletou, 1903, par E. Lambert-
214 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
have the matter in dispute decided according to the tribal
custom. Public opinion, and, probably, if necessary, the "strong
hand " ^ compelled the defendant to abide by and perform the
award of the brehon, but there was no recognized machinery
for legally enforcing it. There was no sheriff nor sheriff's
bailiff to execute the decree. In the case of a person belonging
to the inferior grades the text of the law provided that notice
should precede every distress. When a claim was made against
a chieftain or a bishop, " fasting on " the chieftain or bishop
was the first step in the procedure.
If the chieftain refused to cede to fasting he was to pay
double the thing for which he was " fasted upon." He might,
however, " give a pledge to fasting," and have the case tried.
If a pledge was offered, and the fasting continued notwith-
standing, the claim was lost altogether.
This custom of fasting on a debtor existed in recent times,
and probably still exists, in the Native Statps in India. In
Hindu Law it is called " Sitting Dharna." " Dharna," observes
Maine, " according to the better opinion, is equivalent to the
Roman * Capio,' i.e., seizing or distraining." It would thus be
equivalent to the Gaelic At-jAb-xMl (Distress) s^b-itn, being
equivalent to cap-io, and fasting would, in reality, be a form of
distraining.*
It is erroneously stated in the Preface (vol. ii., p. xl.) that
in the case of a debtor who had no property, if he was of the
chieftain grade, he could, after one day's notice, be arrested,
unless he could get a native to become surety for his remaining
in the territory until the case was tried. In the case of an
absconding debtor, the " fine " was liable after notice. Kings
could not be distrained in person out of regard for the dignity
of their office, but their stewards might be distrained in their
stead.
Fosterage — the giving and taking of children for nurture —
was a custom widely diffused amongst Aryan communities, and
occupied a position of great importance in the tribal system
of Erin. It was a social tie of the most binding character,
uniting tribesmen of different grades, and men of different
tribes and septs in the warmest and most enduring affection.
It was of two kinds — fosterage for affection and fosterage for
" « II serait lynche," D'Arbois.
* Mainoj Early Hist, 038.
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 215
reward. The tract contains minute regulations regarding the
duties, liabilities, and rights, attaching to both kinds.
We shall refer only to the provisions regarding education.
The sons of an ogaire, the lower grade of a fiaith, or noble,
were taught the herding and care of lambs, calves, kids, and
young pigs ; kiln-drying, and the combing of wool, and wood-
cutting. The daughters were taught the use of the quern, the
sieve, and the kneading-trough. The sons of an aire-desa, a
noble of high rank, were taught swimming, shooting, horse-
manship, chess-playing, and horn playing — their music. The
daughters were taught needle-work, cutting-out, and embroi-
dering.
" A king's sons shall have horses in times of races." A
horse was to be supplied from the time the child attained
seven years, and horsemanship taught. It was not taught to
the Feine-grades, which mean here the grades under the grade
of Fiaith.
The Fosterage continued till the " age of selection," i.e.,
marriageable age, which was thirteen for girls and seventeen
for boys.
We shall refer to the tracts dealing with saer stock and
daer stock in our next chapter.
The second division of the Tracts comprises : — (1) The
Book of Aicill ; (2) The Taking of Lawful Possession ; (8)
Judgments of Co-tenancy ; (4) Bee Judgments ; (5) Right of
Water; (6) Precincts; (7) Of the Judgment of every Crime ;
(8) The Land is Forfeited for Crimes ; (9) Divisions of Land ;
(10) Divisions of the Tribe; (11) Crith Gablac ; (12) Sequel
to Crith Gablac ; (13) Of Successions ; (14) Small Primer ;
(15) Heptads ; (16) Judgments on Pledge Interests ; (17) Con-
firmation of Right and Law ; (18) Of the Removal of Covenants.
Of these Tracts, the most important for our purpose would
be the Crith Gablac and Sequel, which purport to deal with
the grades of society, if they were at all reliable. This is,
unfortunately, not so. The grades of society, says the author
of the Tracts, are seven in number, like the seven ecclesiastical
orders, " for it is proper that for every order in the church
there should be a corresponding order among the people."
We adopt in regard to it the views of Richey, who says : —
The Crith Gablac may be fairly characterised as the fantastic
production of an antiquarian lawyer of a strong ecclesiastical bias,
21 G EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
composed at a date at which the tribe system was breaking up, anil the
condition of the people, moral and material, had much deteriorated.
The work is of the highest value as an antiquarian treatise rather on
account of the general principles which it assumes, and the incidental
statements it contains than from the accuracy of its classifications or the
truth of its minute details, and any deductions founded upon a belief in
its historic'i.l value must lead to conclusions involving the too common
error of substituting an imaginary for the actual condition of the
people. ^
Of tliG other texts we have enumerated we shall only refer
to the Book of Aicill, Avhich occupies the whole of Vol. III. of
the Brehon Law Tracts, except 79 pages, and is the most
important of them. It commences : — " The place of this book
is Aicill, near Tara, and the time is the time of Cairbre
Liffechair, son of Cormac, and the cause of its having been
composed is the blinding of Cormac " (details as to which we
have already givenV " And Cairbre used to go to Cormac to
Aicill about every difficult case, and Cormac used to say, ' My
son, that thou mayst know, and explain the exemptions.' " It
is a treatise on the criminal law and on the law of Torts. It
contains such provisions as that every judge was punishable
for neglect, and that the " cat was exempt for eating the food
in the kitchen if it was negligently kept, but not exempt if the
food was taken from the security of a house or vessel."^
Strangely enough, though it was composed in part at least
by Cormac (227-266), and added to by Cenfaelad, who was
wounded at the battle of Magh Rath (642), it is not included
in the Senchus Mor. To this we must now return, and place
before our readers the legend concerning it, which is duly
chronicled in the first volume of the Brehon Law Tracts.
According to this legend Nuada Derg, the brother of King
Laoghaire, at his instigation, killed one of St. Patrick's people,
*' that he might discover whether the saint would grant for-
giveness for it." Then the saint was angered and raised up
his hands towards the Lord and remained in the attitude of
prayer with his hands crossed. And there came a great
shaking and an earthquake at the place, and darkness came
upon the sun and there was an eclipse, and they say that the
gate of bell was then opened and that Tara was being over-
turned, and then it was that Tara became inclined. And the
• Richey, Anc. Laws, III., ccvii
* -A mic 6tiA peifeji i t.a blAc.
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM, 217
Lord ordered him to lower his hands and to obtain judg-
ment for his servant that had been killed, and told him that
he would get his choice of the Brehons in Erin ; and he consented
to do this as God had ordered him.
He chose Dubthac Mac Ua Lugair, and this was grievous to
Dubthac, and he said : " It is irksome to me to be in this cause
between God and man, for if I say that this crime is not to be
atoned for by eric fine it will be bad for thy eric {i.e., the
honour price that he would be entitled to, as we shall see,
for the killing of his servant), and thou wilt not deem it
good/
" If I say that eric fine is to be paid and that (if it is not
paid ?) it is to be avenged, it would not be good in the sight of
God. For what thou hast brought with thee into Erin is the
judgment of the Gospel, and M^hat it contains is perfect forgive-
ness of every evil by each neighbour to the other. What was
in Erin before then was the judgment of the law, i.e., retalia-
tion ; a foot for a foot, an eye for an eye, life for life " (when
the eric fine was not paid).
Dubthac afterwards delivered a metrical judgment, in which
he said ; —
Yea, every living person that inflicts death (maliciously)
Whose misdeeds are judged shall suffer death.
He who lets a criminal escape is himself a culprit.
It is evil to kill by a foul deed.
I pronounce the judgment of death.
Nuada is adjudged to Heaven {i.e., his soul}.
The commentator adds — It was thus the two laws were
fulfilled. The culprit was put to death for his crime, and his
soul was pardoned {i.e., on his baptism),
After this sentence the saint requested the men of Erin to
come to one place to hold a conference with him, and the
Gospel was preached to them. " And they bowed down in utter
obedience to the will of God and Patrick. Then Laoghaire
said, ' It is necessary for you, men of Erin, that every other
' We have translated the text according to our view of the law. As it stands
translated iu Vol. I. we are unable to understand it. When the eric fine was not
paid, the talio, which was suspended only on condition of the fine being paid,
revived. The Church elsewhere fought against this, took the culprit into
sanctuary, arranged the fine or weregild, and in the last resort delivered him into
slavery on condition that his life should be spared. It is a highly important text
wlieu properly understood.
218 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
law should be settled and arranged by us as well as this/ * It
is better to do so,' said Patrick. It was then that all the
professors of the sciences in Erin were assembled, and each of
them exhibited his art before Patrick, in the presence of every
chief in Erin. It was then that Dubthach was ordered to
exhibit the judgments and all the poetry of Erin, and every
law which prevailed among the men of Erin, through the law
of nature, and the law of the prophets (or seers), and in the
judgments of the island of Erin, and in the poets." What did
not clash with the Word of God in the written law and in the
New Testament, and with the consciences of the believers, was
confirmed in the laws of the Brehons by Patrick and by the
ecclesiastics, and by the chieftains of Erin, for the law of nature
had been quite right, except the faith and its obligations, and
the harmony of the Church and the people. And this is the
Senchus Mor. The entry in the Four Masters referring to
these events is A.D. 438. " The tenth year of Laoghaire : The
Senchus and Feinechus of Erin were purified and written."
The commentary states that the Senchus was completed in
the ninth year after the coming of Patrick (432 A.D.) The
authors were, according to the legend, and as stated in Cormac's
Glossary : — Laoghaire, Core, Daire the Firm, three Kings ,
Patrick, Benin, and Cairnech the Just, three saints; Rossa,
Dubthach, and Fergus with goodness, three sages of poetry,
of literature, and of the language of the Feini. They were the
nine props of the Senchus Mor.^ Such is the Legend.
This was, we are told, the Cain Patrick, and no human Brehon
of the Gael is able to abrogate anything that is found in the
Senchus Mor. The text states it contained four laws: (1)
Fosterage (2) Saer stock (3) Daer stock (4) Social relationship,
and also the binding of all by verbal contract, for the world
would be in a state of confusion if verbal contracts were not
binding. There are, it states, three periods at which the world
dies : the period of a plague, of a general war, and of the
dissolution of verbal contracts. There are three things which
are paid, viz. : Tenths, first-fruits, and alms, which prevent
the period of a plague, and the suspension of amity between a
king and the country, and the occurrence of a general war.
These tenths and first fruits are more specifically dealt with in
the tract called Corus Bescna, which appears to have been
* Cor. Gloss., Noes. p. 122.
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 219
written by the author of the legend, or to have been in part
copied from it. The right of a church from its people, it
states, are tithes, first fruits, and firstlings. What are firstlings ?
Every first birth of every human couple, every male child of
the first lawful wife, and every male animal of small or
lactiferous animals. First fruits are the first of the gathering
of any new produce, whether small or great, and every first
calf, and every first lamb that is brought forth in the year —
every tenth afterwards, with a lot between seven {i.e., to set
aside the three worst of the ten, and cast lots between the remain-
ing seven, according to the commentary), with her lawful share
of each family inheritance to the Church, and every tenth plant
of the plants of the earth, and of cattle every year. All this
is part of the Senchus Mor. We are asked to believe that all
this was ordained by the chieftains of Erin within six years
after the arrival of the saint. We refuse to believe it, though
we admit that it would be very desirable that so extensive a
claim should, if rightfully established, be placed under the aegis
of our apostle and the kings and chieftains of the country. We
refrain from saying anything about Dubthac's judgment. If
there is anyone so constituted mentally as to believe that King
Laoghaire allowed his brother to be executed for killing the
charioteer of a foreign missionary at his request, no argument
of ours would be likely to change his opinion. The legend, as
we have seen, says nothing about the law of distress, which is
now the largest part of the text of the Senchus Mor, nor of the
Book of Aicill, which is the most important, and, seemingly,
the oldest of these Law Tracts. The oldest text o^ the Senchus
Mor is a fragment which may be fixed at 1350 A.D. The
residue of the text is one or two centuries later than Cormac's
Glossary, which is ascribed by Stokes to the 10th century. The
legend is not mentioned in the Patrician documents — neither
in the Book of Armagh, nor in the Tripartite Life. There is
no doubt, however, that the Senchus a,iid the other texts contain
much that was old, very old, when they were written, and,
taking the indications to be found in them, scattered, confused,
and often contradictory, as they are, and supplementing them
from other sources of information, we feci justified in presenting
the following views to our readers : —
It is not our purpose to open up here the question of the
origin of property in land, or to go very deeply into the question
220 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
of Tribal Customs. It is, however, necessary to say somethinc^
about the latter. Seebohm has made a special study of Tribal
Custom. He has examined the Burgundian and Visigothic
law8, the laws of the Salic and Ripuarian Franks, the earliest
Norse and Scandinavian laws, and the laws of Scotland. In
particular, he has made a close and minute examination of the
tribal system in Wales, recognising, as he tells us, " the value
of a substantial knowledge of one tribal system as a key to
unlock the riddles of others." ^
In Cymru (Wales) the social unit was a group of kindred
called a " gwele," which word is represented in the Extents by
" lectus," and which Seebohm understands to mean a " bed."
The child was received into the "gwele" on the oath of the
mother in the church where the burial-place of her people was.
She placed her right hand on the altar, and her left hand on
the head of her child. The child was then formally received
as of kin. Until the age of fourteen the youthful Cymro was
to be at his father's platter, who up to that time was to be
responsible for him in everything. The father then took the
boy to the lord or chief to commend bim to his charge, and
then the youth became his man, and he was to answer every
claim himself thenceforth, and to receive from the chief his
da, i.e., an allotment of cattle, with the right of joining in the
co-ploughing of the waste lands. He became a full tribesman
in his own right by " kin and descent." The gift of cattle was
apparently a binding of the relation between the youth and his
chief.
It is, perhaps, permissible to suggest that the giving of
cows, which we shall meet with presently, in the Gaelic
system, may have had its origin in a similar usage. The
gwele into which the young tribesman entered in due course
was a family group of four generations, the landed rights of
which were vested in the great grandfather as its chief of
kindred (penceneadh).^**
During the Hfe-time of the chief of the " gwele," the shares of
his sons, i.e., the shares of maintenance which they were
entitled by custom to get out of the undivided land, stock, etc.,
were called, Seebohm thinks, " gavells." They are described as
8 Tribal Ctistom in Wales, vol. i. (1895). Tribal Custom in Anylo-Sazon Law
1902.
1" Seebohm Wales, 64. Anglo-lSaxon Law, 22.
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 221
*gaven"(a.pparently/a7'm) in the Extents. On the chief's death
the sons became chiefs of these gavells or sub-gavells, but the
" gwele " did not then break up. When the two brothers (if only
sons) died, their sons would be entitled to take equally, per
capita, undivided shares, i.e., if one brother left three sons and
the other sis, each would take one-ninth. When these nine
were all dead, their sons (second cousins) would be entitled to
take, in the same way, per capita, divided shares,^^ and the
" gwele" was then broken up. Females were entitled to portions,
which they took out of the " gwele " on marriage, and at the
time of the Cymric Codes, the date of which is disputed
(probably of the 12th or 13th century, embodying archaic
usage), the orphaned sons of a deceased member were
allowed to take the place of their father in the arrange-
ment we have described. A family group, somewhat wider,
of seven, or in some cases nine, generations was collec-
tively responsible in the case of homicide — a crime likely
to cause a blood feud between kindreds. The members
of the contributory group paid the death fine (galanas) in
unequal proportions, and, in turn, when one of their group
was killed, the death fine was divided amongst them in
the same proportions.^- Within the kindred there was no
death fine for homicide. The murderer, if it was a case of
murder, was too near in blood to be slain. He was driven out,
became a " kin-wrecked " man, and fled like an outlaw to find
shelter where he could. The payment of the death fine was
thus a matter, not between individuals, but between the two
Kindreds. This outline will make the Gaelic system more
intelligible. It is unnecessary, however, to go into further detail.
What we have given has been taken from Seebohm's authorita-
tive works.
At the reception of the Faith in Erin, society was in the
cribal stage of evolution. As under the Cymric custom, the
tribal unit appears to have been, not the individual, nor
}'et the immediate family, but a group of kindred. Within
this group there was social solidarity, and, with some excep-
tions, the members of it wore connected by ties of blood. This
group was called a. fine, a word which was also used sometimes
" Wales, 33,
" Anylu-Saxon Law, 29.
222 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
for the immediate family. It was divided into four hearths or
grades of kindred : —
&
1. Gail Fine — Father, son, grandson, brother ... 4
2. Derh Fine — Grandfather, paternal uncle,
nephew, first cousin ... ... ... 4
3. Gar Fine — Great-grandfather, great-uncle,
great-nephew, second cousin ... ... 4
4. Ind Fine — Great-great-grandfather, great-
great-uncle, great-great-nephew, third
cousin ... ... ... ... 4
Chieftain (probably) ... ... ,,, 1
Total 17
The subject of the Four Hearths is obscure, but the fore-
going is the explanation given by M. D'Arbois, and Seebohm
observes that " viewed in the light of other tribal systems, ii
seems to be nearer to the mark than the various other attempts
to make intelligible what, after all, are very obscure passages
in the Brehon Law Tracts. The sixteen persons making u[)
the four divisions of the fine or kindred must be taken, I
think, as representing classes of relations and not individuals,
e.g., under the head ' first cousin ' must be included all firsD
cousins, and so on throughout." In the Brehon Tracts the
number of this group is stated to be seventeen persons, and
Seebohm adds : " He himself (the chieftain) would form tho
seventeenth person on the list."
The Four Hearths, comprising in this way the sixteen grades
nearest of kin to the criminal, were liable to the four hearths
of the man killed in the cases where eric was payable, and
the fine received in the same proportionas it paid. The shares
Df the various grades were unequal, but fixed in definite pro-
portions whether er'ic was received or paid by them. This
was as between one fine and another. As between the culprit
and the other members of his fine, in the case of homicide oi"
non-necessity, i.e., " where the death was intentional and not.
deserved by the injured party." — (III., 697.) — the murderer
and his property were given up for it in the first instance, but
the liability of the fine remained if this proved insufficient.
In cases of necessary homicide, i.e., by misadventure, and
so excusable, all the fine contributed proportionally, the
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 223
culprit not more than his defined quota. In cases other tlian
homicide, the culprit paid all in the first instance, and the person
injured received all the compensation.
The eric fine was composed of two elements: —
I. — Corp dire or Body fine proper, which was the same for all classes —
seven cumhals or twenty-one cows, to which was added one
cumhal for compensation (aithgen).
Total = Seven cumhals.
II. — E?ieelann (face price), usually called honour price, i.e., payment for
insult, which was not confined to homicide and varied according
to rank.
These two, with some exceptional additions, made up the
e7'ic.
Enech-lann varied according to rank, and was a most
important element in tribal custom. Besides entering into the
eric fine, it regulated the value of the tribesman's oath, his
guarantee, his pledge and his evidence. It was the honour
price of the person injured or slain that had to be paid. Seebohm
states ^2 that in the case of homicide it was the honour price
of the slayer, not " the honour price of the slain that was to
be paid, i.e., the higher the rank of the slayer the greater the
payment to the kindred of the person slain." He founds this
view very naturally on the following passage, which he quotes
from the translation of the Book of Aicill, p. 99 : — " The double
of his own honour price is due of each . . . for secret
murder." On referring to the Gaelic text, however, it appears
to be faulty at this point. The word eneclann does not occur.
The words are -oibU-O a lAin bu-oein. The words should pro-
bably be 'oiblA-b tAw eneclAinm, i.e., the double of the full
honour price of the person slain. That this is so is shown in
the Book of Aicill (p. 497). In the case of a chieftain or saer
tribesman refusing to attend, or going away from a hosting, he
incurred both a smaet fine and honour price fine. And it is
provided " that whenever it is a smaet fine that is paid, it
shall be paid according to the rank of the person who pays it.
And whenever honour price is paid, it shall be paid accord-
ing to the rank of the person to whom it is paid." ^*
'^ Trib. Oust, in A.S. Laio, c. IV. and p. 81.
^^Anc. Law. Ill, 99.
224 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Homicide, undoubtedly, was not an exception to this
rule. If a king or a bishop was killed by a daer tribesman
(ceiLe), would the honour price of the latter be accepted by the
fine of the former ? Surely not. If the tribesman was satirized
or insulted, if his protection was violated, if he was robbed, or
his wife or daughter was abducted, his honour price was the
measure of the damages he was entitled to. So the honour
price of the man slain was, we make no doubt, the measure
of the damages to which the fine were entitled.
The system of eric fine found no favour with the Angevin,
or English lawyers, who came to Erin. There were no hangings
and quarterings, and above all no forfeitures. Spenser thought,
as we have seen, that the system led to the commission and
screening of murder.
This, however, may well be doubted. The fine who had
to pay the eric were, no doubt, a very vigilant police to
prevent such outrages, and punish the culprit when
they deemed it fit to do so. The eric was only a settlement
of the quarrel between fine and fine ; it did not apply to inter-
tribal homicide, and our texts are singularly free from records
of assassinations, poisoning, and other malicious homicides.
The talio is found in nearly every civilization at a particular
stage. It was, no doubt, a step in advance. It involved an
inquiry before a judge in most cases. It ordered men to put
some curb on their passions, and observe some proportion
between the injury and the punishment.
An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth was better than
that human life should be taken, often on suspicion, for every
trifling insult. By it, however, the tribes were led into
keeping a sort of debtor and creditor account of acts of violence,
and when this went on for a few generations, the blood feud
(fich bunaed) was firmly established, and revenge became a
pious and a public duty. In putting an end to this, the system
of eric fines was in its turn useful, and found a place in due
time in every system where the talio once prevailed. We do
not, of course, suggest that it was as good as the system of
criminal jurisprudence which exists to-day amongst civilised
nations. But we venture to think if the choice were offered to
an enlightened jurist to-day to decide between the eric system
and the barbarous system of death penalties for petty theft,
which was the Draconian Law of England in Spenser's time and
THE SENCHUS MOR AND THE TRIBAL SYSTEM. 225
until the beginning of the last century, ho would, for a
community circumstanced as the Gael then were, give his
preference to the eric system.
After explaining the meaning of the terms used to indicate
the honour price, we shall now give a list of " honour prices "
of the various ranks in the community, compiled with great
industry and care by Seebohm, from the Brehon Law Tracts.
as accurately as the confused and often contradictory nature of
the material permitted.
The cumhal. or bondmaid, was the highest barter unit in
Erin. How this came to be so we cannot say. Ridgeway
says, " in Homer the cow is the principal barter unit, but the
slave is occasionally employed as a higher unit."^^ It is
tempting to suggest that there was a foreign trade in slaves,
to account for it, but we distrust tempting suggestions,
especially those which we make ourselves, and prefer to wait
for better knowledge on this point. At the time we speak of,
the cumhal was used merely as a unit of account, and was
reckoned at three great milch cows or plough-oxen, which are
said to have been valued at twenty-four screpalls. The
screpall, again, was equal to three silver pennies, each of which
weighed eight grains of wheat, so that the pinginn was nearly
equal to the silver penny of Elizabeth's time.
Honour Price List.^^
Flaith {Cow Rent Bectivers). Cumlials.
RiTuaith ... ... ... ... 7
Aire Forgaill, 15 Seds, ? 30 Seds, or ... ... 6
f) J.U.1S1, -jU ,, „ ,•. ••• 4
„ Ard, 15 „ . „ ... ... 3
„ Desa, 10 „ „ ••• ••• 2
Cow Bent Payers.
Bo Aire, 5 Seds or ... ... 1
Og Aire, 3 Seds of Cow Kind ,, ... ... 1
Medboth Man, Adair t Heifer ,, ... Colpach Heifer.
(The lowest grade (two years' old) „ ... (three years' old^.
in the free community).
In our next chapter we shall consider the status of the
tribal occupier, and the way in which his rights were dealt
with at the time of the eonfiscations and evictions in the
six counties of Ulster.
" Ridgeway's Metallic Currency, 30, 33.
^^ The Sed here may be taken to be a Ri sed, and equal to a milch cow or
plough-ox. All the estimates and statements should be received with great reserve.
—Seebohm, Cxist. in A. S. Law, p. 91. By cow rent we mean rent paid for cows
like the rent of the modem " dairyman " in Ireland.
Q
[ 226 1
CHAPTER XV.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS,
THE tribal district was at first, as a matter of fact, and after-
wards in theory, considered to be the property of the
tribe, and the enjoyment of it by the tribal units was in early
times of a simple and easily intelligible character. Specific
portions of it were marked off for each fine or family group
for a dwelling and curtilage, and some " board-land " was set
apart for the chieftain for his life. The remainder consisted
of arable, pasture, and waste land. The pasture and waste
were used in common, each group being allowed to place so
many cows, horses, sheep, etc., upon it.
We suggest that the arable land was farmed, as in mediaeval
times, by a system of fallows in this way : Let us suppose a
fallow in alternate years. A field of, say, one hundred acres,
was tilled by a certain number of groups one year. Their
shares in the field were measured, and were then assigned to
each group by drawing lots, as is still the custom in the country
when a field of old pasture is turned up and let out in half
acres for potato planting. The next year that field remained in
fallow. In the third year the groups did not go back to their
old portions, but drew lots again for their plots in the field. In
the interests of good husbandry this system was better than a
mere tenancy at will. Every tribesman joined in the field of one
hundred acres was interested in having every plot in it properly
tilled, as it might fall to his own lot on the next division. More-
over, there could be no "jerrymandering" ; everything was fair,
open, and above board. Cassar says of the Germans — "They
do not apply themselves much to agriculture, and their diet
consists principally of milk, cheese, and flesh meat. Nor has
anyone a fixed measure of tillage land (agri) and boundary
marks for himself, but the magistrates and chieftains assign
}o the family groups related in blood who have come together,
the amount of tillage land they think proper, where they think
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 227
proper, and compel them to change to another (place or plot) the
ensuing year. They give many reasons for this. (1) That
they may not be tempted by uninterrupted use to exchange
tlie pursuit of war for agriculture. (2) That they may not be
eager to acquire large estates, and the weaker (tribesmen) be
turned out of their holdings by the more powerful. (8) That
they may not build houses carefully constructed to avoid heat
and cold. (4) That there may be no greed for wealth wluch
gives birth to faction and discord. (5) That they may keep the
mass of the people contented when each man sees that his
property is as large as that of the most powerful." Again, of
the Suevi, he says more briefly — " There is no tilled field amongst
them in private or separate ownership, nor do they continue in
one plot (loco) more than one year tilling it." ^
So Horace says of the Getae :—" Nee cultura (tillage) placet
longior annua," Od. iii., 24, and Tacitus : " Arva per annos
mutant." — Germ. 26.
Caesar says, as regards the Suevi : — " Men of huge frames "
(immani corporis magnitudine, like the Gael), that they
changed from place to place every year for dwellings (incolendi
causa) as well as for fallows, as we suggest.
The mensal lands were at first attached to the chieftainship,
and passed in succession from chief to chief. But after a time,
whether by appropriation of these mensal lands or othewise,
the chiefs and more powerful amongst them encroached on the
public ownership, and class distinctions were developed in the
way Caesar (writing the views of a Roman Democrat about
latifundia) points out. As regards Ireland, this matter is
exceedingly obscure, and we find no intelligible and reliable
information in our texts enabling us to speak with confidence
until we reach the period of the confiscations in Ulster. For
this reason we shall not attempt to follow conjecturally the
various stages of the growth and development of the organisa-
^ Agriculturae non student, majorque pars eorum victus in lacte, caseo
carne consistit. Neque quisquam agri modura certum aut lines habet proprios,
sed magistratuset principes in annos singulos gentihus coynationibusque hominum
qui turn una coierunt quantum, et quo loco visum est agri attribuunt atque anno
post alio transire cogunt. Ejus rei multas afFeruut causas ; ne assidua consuetudine
capti studium belli gerendi agriculturae commutent, ne latos fiues parare studeant
potentioresque humiliores possessionibus expellant ; ne accuratius ad frigora
atque aestus vitandos jedificent, ne qua oriatur pecuniae cupiditas qua ex re
factiones dissensionesque nascuntur, ut animi aequitate plebem contineant cum suas
quisque opes cum potentiasimis aequari vident. — Bell. Oall. vi., 22. The similarity
between the Gael and Nordic Germans in religion, social customs, and skulls, is
striking and suggestive.
228 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
tion of society, and shall doal very briefly with the intermediate
period.
The Gael, like the Germans, did not apply themselves much
to agriculture. The principal wealth of the tribe consisted in
herds and flocks — in cows, pigs, sheep and horses. The tribal units
had a right to pasture a certain number of horses, cows and sheep
on the common pasture lands, and to place a certain number of
swine in the common woods ; having regard to the number of the
population there was enough and to spare for everybody. The
only pasture land, held in severalty, was certain " board land "
assigned to the chief. Long before the time of the Brehon
law tracts, many changes had taken place. Society had become
divided sharply into free and unfree classes. To begin at the
bottom, there was a large body of slaves, the probable number
of whom there is no means of estimating. Next in order
probably came a class of persons called fuidirs. They are
supposed by some to have been non-tribesmen — strangers from
another tribe, or foreigners who came to reside on a chieftain's-
land. After three or four generations, like the Cymric Attilds,
they probably became recognised as freemen. In the fourth
generation, it is said, they perhaps became daer botach, half
free, and in the fifth, sencleithe. This is what might be ex-
pected from the analogy of other systems ; but we are not in a
position to speak with any certainty on details, as the accounts
we have, and the meanings assigned to the terms midbod
fuidir, daer botach and sencleithe are not uniform.
Next in the ascending scale came the cow-rent payers. These
stood below the FlaitJis. In the Senchus Mor there is, as we have
seen, a treatise on saer stock and on daer stock. This mode of
occupation is referred to in the translation as " saer stock tenure
and daer stock tenure." The texts, however, refer to the letting
and hiring of stock exclusively, and are silent as to the letting
of land. In the case of " saer stock," the letting was without
security, and so it was called " saer," i.e., a free letting. In
the case of " daer stock," the letting was with security, and
the hirers were called " daer," i.e., unfree hirers, or giallna.
. The chief could compel the tribesmen to take a certain
quantity of stock without security (f^ef-pAc). On the receipt
of saer stock the tribesman was bound to yield homage, and at
the end of three years to give a sed, i.e., a cow, in addition, or
to pay an equivalent in food, rent, etc., and also to do some
THE TRI13AL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 229
labour at the erection of the dun (fort) and the reaping of the
harvest; he was bound also to go on military service.
No one was bound to take daer-stock even from his own
chieftain, or king. It was a matter of contract. The saer-tenant
could not separate from his chieftain, unless the latter was
indigent and so required his stock back. Nor could the chieftain
require his stock back unless the tribesman became indigent
and the security of the stock was placed in danger.
The food rent was free to the successor of the chief (flaith) for the
chief is not competent to forgive the food rent so as to bind his
successor (113).
Saer stock or daer stock from an external chief might be
returned or claimed back at any time. As regards daer stock
it could not be received without the consent of the tribe, which
shows that the ownership of the tribe land was in the tribe
and not in the ri, flaith or bo-aire individually.
The stock is received either with or without the knowledge of the
fine by the tribesman (ceile) ; for if it was unknown to them [that he
did so], they could impugn his contracts ; but if it was with their know-
ledge though the stock be ever so great it is fastened upon them,
(page 222).
From the ri-tnaith to the Bo-aire and ogaire the various
grades of society were bound together by the nexus of stock,
taking. At each step the inferior takes stock from, and pays
food-rents to, the higher. When the Brehons came to the
Ard-ri they were puzzled. Honour-price was fixed, as we
have seen, by rank, and rank was estimated and delimitated
by stock-taking. From whom did the Ard-ri take stock?
Four times seven cumhals to the King of Erin without opposition,
for which (being without opposition) lie received stock from tlie King
of the Romans, or it was by the co-arb of Patrick the stock was given
to the King of Erin ; but whichever of them is supposed to give stock
to the King of Erin, it is not to show giallnahivvag in him, but to show
honour price. (225).
The sketch we have just given shows that the tribe and
every member of it had definite rights in the tribal laud, that
the land belonged to the tribe, and that nothing could be
further from the real facts of the case than the pretence that
the chieftain or ri<jh was a kind of owner in fee-simple or
230 EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
allodial owner, of the tribal lands, and that the tribesmen were
tenants at will on his estate and liable to be evicted by him or
by anyone, the Crown not excepted, claiming through him.
We shall now consider how the tribal occupier's rights were
dealt with at the time of the confiscations and evictions in the
six counties of Ulster.
On the accession of James I. in 1603 the Irish policy
adopted by the Government in the first instance was to " settle "
the various " countries," and establish freeholders. This was in
eflfect a return to the enlightened policy of Henry VIII., who
had stood out tenaciously against the project of confiscation
and plantation, which his hungry courtiers, demoralized by
the plunder of the churches and monasteries in England, urged
persistently upon him. This wise policy was not, however,
maintained. If the English courtiers had sharp appetites, the
Scottish crew who followed in the wake of the Stuart were
famished. And the monarch then, or a little later on, was
borrowing money at ten per cent, for the public service. The
Exchequer being empty, the courtiers should look elsewhere
to gratify their cravings.
Appointed Solicitor-General in 1603, and Attorney-General
in 1606, Sir John Davis held office until 1619, and it was
during his time, and, to a large extent, by his actions and
instrumentality, that the policy of forfeiture, confiscation, and
eviction was substituted for the policy of conciliation and
the conversion of the tribal occupiers into freeholders. The
various phases of the policy appear in the correspondence
between Davis and Salisbury, from which we make extracts.
The italics are ours.
In April, 1604, Davis wrote to Salisbury :—
He (i.e., the Earl of Tyrone), seeks to secure that, by an order from
the State, all the tenants who formerly dwelt in his country, but are
now fled into the Pale and other places to avoid his extreme cutting
and extortion, should be returned unto him by compulsion ; albeit
these tenants had rather be strangled than returned unto him. I
hope to see in the next Parliament an Act passed in this land that
shall enjoin every great lord to make such certain and durable estates
to his tenants as would be good for themselves, good for their tenants,
and good for the Commonwealth.
It does not stand with reason of State or policy that Tyrone should
have such interest in the bodies of the King's subjects ; for it was ihis
usurpation upon the bodies and persons of men that made him able to
make war upon the State of Engiaad, and make his barbarous followers
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AXD SIR JOHN DAVIS. 231
think they had no other king, because their lives and their goods
depended upon his will. In England, " Tenants at will " enabled
Warwick and the great lords in the Barons' wars to raise so great a
multitude of men. Whereas, at this day (tenancies at will being
replaced by fixed estates), if any of these great lords of England should
have a mind to stand upon their guard — well, they may have some of
their household servants or retainers, or some few light-brained,
factious gentlemen to follow them. But as for their tenants — these
fellows will not hazard the losing of their sheep, their oxen, and their
corn, and the undoing of themselves, their wives, and their children, for
the love of the best landlord that is in England.^
^o'
Chichester was appointed Deputy, and, in the phrase of tbo
period, " came to the sword," in Dublin, on February 8rd,
1605. lie was, it would appear, instructed to pursue the
policy recommended by Davis. Soon after his appointment,
he issued a proclamation which had been prepared beforehand,
and which bears date March 11th, 1604. This highly important
proclamation states that the Deputy had received Letters
Patent from the King, in which, after signifying his desire to
establish the commonwealth and the realm (of Ireland), he took
particular notice of two mischiefs there. The first was the
renewing of claims and challenges concerning private injuries
and public offences during the late rebellion. This he reme-
died by granting a full amnesty up to the 20th March in the
first year of his reign. The second mischief, which concerns us
more nearly here, was " the continuance of such oppressions
and exactions as had been usurped by divers chief lords of
countries, on the bodies, lands, and goods of the tenants and
freeholders of the same, whereby the said tenants and inhabitants
were enforced wholly to depend on the will of their said lords,
being deprived by reason of their ignorance and the remote
places wherein they dwelt, of that benefit of the Common Laws
and royal protection which his other subjects enjoyed to their
unspeakable comfort." The Lords and gentlemen of countries
were, in remedy of this, forbidden to imprison for debt, trespass,
or private displeasure, or to levy any fine without lawful
warrant of the ordinary Minister of Justice.
As regards the lands situate in these countries, the proclama-
tion states that the lords who had received Letters Patent of
territories from the Crown, under colour of the general words in
the Patents, " claim and challenge to themselves the interest
* Jr. Cal., J, 60 and 100, condensed.
232 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
and possession of such lands as divers ancient freeholders and
their ancestors had been lawfully seized of, within the said terri-
tories, by course of inheritance, beyond the time of memory ; the
said lords and gentlemen alleging sometimes that the said free-
holders were but tenants-at-will ; and sometimes that they
have forfeited all the said lands by the late rebellion, whereas,
in truth, the most part of the said freeholders were driven into
rebellion by the said lords and gentlemen themselves, and yet
were never attainted for the same ; but having received his
Majesty's gracious pardon for their said defection, so as then
they stood as clear and upright in the law as any other loyal
subjects." The mischief was remedied by declaring that
according to the true intent and meaning of the Patents, the
general words did not affect the interests of the freeholders, and
the lords were strictly enjoined to allow them to enjoy the
same without extorting cuttings or exactions.
There were also, the proclamation states, on divers scopes
and extents of land, persons who had no certain estate nor
place of habitation, and the lords were enjoined so to dispose
of their lands, as to receive certain rents and duties, and
forbear from the use and usurpation of cuttings and cosherings.^
It is not at all likely that the condition of the general body
of tribal occupiers was at all benefited by this proclamation.
In the summer of 1616, Davis accompanied the Lord
Deputy (Chichester), the Chancellor and others, in a visitation
they made in the counties of Monaghan, Fermanagh and
Cavan, with the view of settling these countries, and making
freeholders. In a letter to Salisbury he gives a very full
account of the state of Fermanagh (Maguire's country), which
shows that the tribal arrangements we have described, though
impaired by the usurpations of the chieftains, were still in the
main preserved.
" "We found Fermanagh," he wrote, " to be divided into seven
baronies, containing each 7i ballybetaghs of land, in all 51| bally-
botaghs of land, chargeable with Maguire's rent and other contributions
of the country. In addition there were free lands, (1) Termon or
church lands, (2) Mensal lands of Maguire, (3) Privileged lands of
■ Chroniclers, Rhymers and Gallowglasses, This amounted to about two
ballybetaghs.
' The contention was that the attainder included the inferior tenants, whilst
the new Patents did not expressly mention their interests, and that consequently
their interests were not resuscitated, and that the new patentees took the land dis-
charged from them.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 233
" IMaguire's mensal lands lay in several baronies, and did not ex-
ceed four ballybetaghs. They were free from charges of the country,
because they yielded a large proportion of butter and meal and other
provisions for IMaguire's table. Besides these food rents (from the
Mensal lands), Maguire had about 240 beeves yearly paid unto him
out of the seven baronies, and about his castle at Enniskillen he had
about a half ballybetagh, which he manured (tilled) with his own
churls. . . . There are many gentlemen who claim estate of free-
hold in that country by a more ancient title than Maguire himself doth
to the chief rie." ^
The area of Fermanagh is 289,228 statute acres, of which
at least 115,000 are arable.
Joyce gives the usual acreage of the ballybetagh in tabular
form : —
1 Tricha, ced, or luath equal 30 Ballybetaghs.
1 Ballybetagh „ 12 Sesrachs (or plough lands).
1 Sesrach „ 120 Ir. acres.*
A ballybetagh or townland was sufficient to maintain " 300
cows without one touching another;" it contained 3,500 statute
acres.
We may supplement this description by a reference to Sir
Toby Caulfield's account of the Earl of Tyrone's estate, over
which he was appointed receiver after the flight of the Earl.
This valuable document shows (1*^) That no certain portion of
land was let by the Earl to any of his tenants, as they are
called ; (2"^) that the rents received by the Earl were received
partly in money, partly in victuals, oats, butter, pigs, sheep,
etc. ; (3^) that the money-rents were chargeable on the cows
that were milch or in calf that grazed on his lands, at the
rate of twelve pence the quarter the year ; the cows to be
numbered at May and Hallowtide.
The amounts of the rent for the years ending Hallow-
tide, 1608, 1609, 1610, were £2,102, £2,862, and £2,847
respectively. We understand these to be rents from the
demesne lands of the Earl, stated to be in the counties of
'Fermanagh, at the close of the sixteenth century, consisted of a certain
number of ballybetaghs, each of which contained four i|uarters, and each quarter
four iates (a name peculiar to Cavan and Monaghan). Thus each ballj^betagh
contained sixteen fates, each tate being estimated at 60 ^ Irish acres. The tate
continuing in local use was stereotyped there as a townland containing on the
average 184 statute acres. The ballybetagh, according to this, was = 184 x 16 =
2,944 statute acres. — Reeves' Froc. l!y. Ir. Ac, vii., 477. In the survey made for
the Plantation, according to HiU (107) these tales are set down as thirty acres
Irish or thereabouts, and the undertakers got them at this estimate.
* Soc. Ir , I. 40, II. 372.
234 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Tyrone, Armagh, and Coleraine. Sir Toby was appointed to
take charge of such lands and territories as belonged to the
traitor in T3-rone, Coleraine, and Armagh. Allowing the then
value of money to have been over fifteen times as much as at
present, the rental was moderate for his demesne lands alone.^
The food rents of Maguire's mensal lands were contained in a
parchment roll in the possession of O'Brislan, a chronicler and
principal brehon of that country. O'Brislan was summoned ;
he said the roll had been destroyed by the English, but the
Lord Chancellor " did minister an oath unto him. The old
man, fetching a deep sigh, confessed that he knew where the
roll was, but said that it was dearer to him than his life, and
that he would never produce it unless the Lord Chancellor
would take a like oath to return it. The Lord Chancellor,
smiling, gave his hand and word, and thereupon the old brehon
drew the roll out of his bosom. " When it was translated, we
perceived how many porks, how many vessels of butter, and
how many measures of meal and other such gross duties did
arise unto Maguire out of his mensal lands. In time of
peace he did exact no more ; marry, in time of war he made
himself owner of all, cutting, i.e., exacting, what he listed, and
imposing as many bonagJits or hired soldiers upon them as he
had occasion to use. In the late war he hired them out of
Connact and Breifne O'Reilly, as his own people were inclined to
be scholars and husbandmen rather than kerne."
" We called unto us the inhabitants of every barony severally,
and had present several of the clerks or scholars of the
country, who knew all the septs and families, and all their
branches, and the dignity of one sept above another, and what
families or persons were the chiefs of every sept, and who next,
and who were of the third rank and so forth till they descended
to the most inferior man of all the baronies. Moreover, they
took upon them to tell what quantity of land every man ought
to have by the custom of their country, which is of the nature
of gavel kind, whereby as their septs or families did multiply
their possessions have been from time to time sub-divided and
broken into many such parcels as almost every acre of land
hath a several owner, which termeth himself a lord and his
portion of land his country, notwithstanding that Maguire him-
self had a chiefry over all the country and some demesnes
» Ir. CaL, III., 532.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 235
that did pass to him only, that carried that title. So was there
a chief of every sept, who had certain services, duties or
deviesnes that ever passed to the tanist of that sept, and never
was subject to division" All these details they took down,
descending to such as possessed two tuaths. There they
stayed, as they knew that " the purpose was to establish free-
holders fit to serve on juries, and less than two tuaths would
not make a 40s. freehold per annum ultra reprisalim, and,
therefore, were not of competent ability for that service, yet
the number of freeholders named in this country was above
WO."
This report, made out in this way, was handed to the
Deputy, who called the principal inhabitants into the camp,
and told them that he came on purpose to understand the
state of every particular man in that country, to the end that
he might establish and settle the same. His lordship's speech
and good demonstration to the people gave them great con-
tentment. " Touching the inferior gentlemen and inhabitants
it was not certainly known to the State in Dublin whether
they were only tenants at will to the chief lords (whereof the
uncertain cuttings which the lords used upon them might be
an argument), or whether they were freeholders yielding of
right to their chief lord certain rents and services, as many of
them do allege, affirming that Irish cutting was an usurpation
and a wrong."
[ 236 ]
CHAPTER X^.— (Continued.)
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS.
DAVIS was thus at first fully in agreement with, and an
energetic advocate of, the policy we have indicated, and
his views were, no doubt, fully shared by the Deputy Chichester.
It was probably with the view of bringing more prominently
into relief the precarious character of the possession of the
inferior occupier of the soil that the Deputy obtained from the
judges the following Resolution ^ as to the legal character of
what was called the Irish custom of gavelkind : —
First it is to be known, reporbs Davis,^ that in every Irish territory
there was a lord and chieftain and a tanist, who was his successor
apparent. And of every Irish sept or lineage there was also a chief
who was called a Cennjinny or Cajmt Cognationis. All the possession
within the Irish territories (before the common law of England was
established in this realm as it now is) ran always either in course of
tanistry or in course of gavelkind. Every seigniory or chiefry, with the
portion of land which passed with it, went without partition to the
tanist, who alwaj's came in by election or the strong hand, and not
by descent, but all the inferior tenancies were partible between the
males in gavelkind. Yet the estate which the lord had in the chiefrv
or which the inferior tenants had in gavelkind was not ap estate of
inheritance but a temporary or transitory possession ; for as the next
heir of the lord or chieftain was not to inherit the chiefry, but the
oldest and worthiest of the sept, as is shown before (F. 78) in the case
of tanistry, who was often removed and expelled by another who was
more active and strong than he, so the lands of the nature of gavelkind
were not partible amongst the next heirs male of him who died seized,
but amongst all the males of his sept in this manner. The Cennjinny,
or chief of the sept (who was commonly the most ancient of the sept),
made all the partitions at his discretion, and after the death of any
tenant who had a competent portion of land, assembled all the sept, and
having thrown all their possessions into hotchpot made a new partition
of all, in which partition he did not assign to the son of him who died
the portion which his father had, but he allotted to each of the sept,
according to his seniority, the better or greater portion. . . Also,
by this custom, bastards had their portion with the legitimates, wives
^ It is reported by Davia himself in Law French. Wo give it translated and
abridged.
•■» Hill 3, Jacobi, 1606.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 237
were excluded of dower, and daughters were not inheritable although
their fathers had died without male issue. By the custom of Kent the
lands were partible among the male heirs, bastards were not admitted,
wives were entitled to dower, females in default of males inherited.
The Irish custom was agreeable in several of these points to the custom
of gavelkind, which was in use in N. Wales, which was reproved and
reformed by the Statute of Rutland made 12 E. I., and utterly abolished
by the Statute 34 H. VIII., c. 28. For these reasons, and because all
the Irish countries and the inhabitants were from thenceforward to be
governed by the rules of the common law of England, it was resolved and
determined by all the judges that the Irish custom of gavelkind was void
in law, not only for the inconvenience and unreasonableness of it, but
because it was a mere personal custom and could not alter the descent
of inheritance. And all the lands of these Irish countries were adjudged
to descend according to the course of the common law.
This resolution was not, our readers will understand, a
decision or judgment of a court in a case pending before it,
but rather an opinion of the judges, which was registered
amongst the Acts of Council.^ The proviso was added that if
any of the Tnere Irish possessed and enjoyed any portion of
land by the custom of gavelkind up to the commencement of
the king's reign such person should not be disturbed in his
possessions, but should be continued and established in it, but
that afterwards all lands should be adjudged to descend
according to the Common Law.*
The word gavelkind does not occur in the Brehon Law
tracts, nor any word like it, nor is there any trace to be found
in them of the " hotchpot custom " mentioned in the resolu-
tion; nor is there any evidence to be found outside the
resolution to support the statements as to it therein contained.
Hallam, Gardiner, and other careful and reliable historians
were naturally misled by this report of Davis. The resolution,
which was, probably, satisfactory to the Deputy, was based, so
far as it had any basis, on the knowledge which the English
lawyers and judges had of the custom of Kent, and, more
particularly, of the custom in N. Wales, which is referred to in
the resolution. Hallam refers to the " exact similarity " of the
^ The Council Book is not known to exist at the present time.
* Oavelkind. The name implies that it was originally a tenure, by " gavel,"
i.e., the payment of rent or other fixed services other than military. This agrees
with the identification of it with Socage, kind = geoynd, kind or species. The
application of the Kentish word to the Welsh and Irish system of succession led
to the notion that the word was of Celtic origin, an alleged Irish gabhail-cine
from gabhadl taking, and dne tribe or sept, appears with the rendering gavelkind
in O'Reilly's Dictionary, (Murray's Die, sub. voce.)
288 "LiARLT IRISH HISTORY.
custom of Irish gavelkind " to the rule of succession laid down
in the ancient laws of Wales," and adds, " It seems impossible
to conceive that these partitions were renewed on every death
of one o£ the sept. But they are asserted to have taken place so
frequently as to produce a continued change of possession."
In after times the custom of gavelkind was not only legalised
but made compulsory in the case of the estates of Catholics by
the statute 2 Anne, unless the eldest son conformed to Pro-
testantism within a limited time after the death, in which case
the estate went to him in course of primogeniture.
Another case, known as "the case of Tanistry," came before
the Dublin court afterwards and is reported by Davis. It
may be conveniently referred to here. The lawyers of that
day misunderstood by tanist, the chieftain or lord of a country.
The true meaning in Gaelic is second, i.e., next to succeed.
The case was an ejectment on the title to recover O'Callaghan's
country in Cork. The general issue was pleaded and a special
verdict found. The plaintiff claimed through a tanist, i.e.,
chieftain, who was elected according to the Irish custom, which
was found in the special verdict, to be as follows : — " That when
any person died seized of the lands claimed then such lands
ouo^ht to descend, and have time out of mind descended to
the oldest and most worthy of the blood and name (seniori et
dignissimo viro sanguinis et cognominis), of the person so dying
seized, and that the daughters of such person were not inherit-
able." The judges held (1) That this custom was unreasonable
and void, ab initio ; (2) That it was void for uncertainty ; it
could not be reduced to certainty by any trial or proof, for the
dignity (i.e., worth) of a man lieth in the opinion of the multi-
tude, which is the most uncertain thing in the world. Again,
" the estate was uncertain. The Tanist hath not an estate of
inheritance in his natural capacity, because the oldest and most
worthy doth not take as heir, for the most worthy comes in by
election, and not as heir, and the tanist hath not an inheritance
by succession in a politic capacity because he is not incorporate
by the common law as a person, etc., and if he hath only an
2state for life it cannot descend, and so he hath no estate
whereof the law can take notice."
This decision is not in conflict with the view we have pre-
sented that the ownership of the Tribal land was in the tribe who
gave an estate for life only to the chieftain in the mensal lands.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 239
Legally, it stands on a different footing from the resolution in
the case of gavelkind. Here the court had seisin of a duly
constituted cause, and declared a judgment which bound not
only in the particular case, but was entitled to be followed in
the administration of the law in every subsequent case of the
same kind until it was reversed. The Resolution, on the
contrary, lacking all these essentials, was nothing more than
the private opinion of jurists formed without argument of
counsel, and possibly with a view to political requirements
without taking evidence, and probably on assumptions derived
from the custom of Kent and the Cymric Codes — in fact, on
those views which Davis says, as we shall see presently, that
both he and the Chief Justice found on exact inquir}^ to be
wholly erroneous.
In the summer of 1606 the judges went on circuit in
Ulster, and afterwards Davis, who was then serjeant-at-law,
went with the Chief Justice, Sir James Ley, to Waterford,
Wexford, and Wicklow.^ On his return he wrote to Salisbury
(November 11th): —
On our return we understood that not many days before the Earl
of Tyrone had, in a violent manner, taken a great distress of cattle
from O'Cahan (5who hath married his bastard daughter), and pretended
to be lord of all that country that beareth the name of Colraine (Derry). I
mention this to you, not in respect of the riot, but to make an overture
to you of good advantage which I confess I understood not before I made
my last jourhey into Ulster. I thought without question, and so it was
generally conceived by us all, that the Earl of Tyrone had been entirely
seized in possession and demesne of all the country of Tirone, being in
length sixty miles and in breadth nearly thirty, and that no man had one
foot of freehold in that country but him self, 'except the bishop and farmers
of the abbey lands. . . But now on our last northern journey we
made so exact an inquiry of the estates and possessions of the Irishery
that it appeared unto us (i.e., the Chief Justice and himself) that the
chief lords of every country had a seigniory consisting of certain rents
and duties, and had, withal, some special demesne, and that the
tenants or inferior inhabitants were not tenants-at-will, as the lords
pretended, but freeholders, and had as good and large an estate in
their tenancies as the lords in their seigniories, and that the uncertain
cuttings and exactions were a mere usurpation and a wrong, and were
taken de facto and not de jure when the lords made war one upon the
other, or joined together in rebellion against the Crown. This we found
to be universally and infallibly true in all the Irish countries in which
we held assizes this last summer : — namely, in the several countries of
McMahon, Magyre, O'Reilly in Ulster, and in the countries of the
s Ir. Cat. II., 19.
240 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Birnes {O'Birnes) and Cavanagh in Leinster, The suggestion is that
these inferior freeholds were vested in the Crown by the Act of Attainder
of Shane O^NeU (II. Eliz), and not regranled in the Queen'' s subsequent
Patent to the Earl, and thai. I should be directed to prefer informations
of intrusion against the occupiers of these lands with a view to a Plan-
tation.
The villainy of this overture is appalling. Even if Davis
was right in point of law, which we have no doubt he was not,
a more dishonourable suggestion, considering the pardon and
proclamation^ and public declarations of the Deputy already
mentioned, was never made by a law officer to a monarch.
This was before the flight of the Earls, which took place on the
14th September, 1607.7
Ministers in London did not fall in with the overture of
Davis ; but no evidence is now forthcoming as to what reply
was made to him. Possibly the matter was under consideration
when the situation was completely changed by the flight of the
Earls. We shall see presently how Davis changed his plans
and fashioned his legal opinions to suit altered circumstances.
The Earls fled on the 14th September, 1607, and about ten
• See the "words of the Proclamation, ante.
■^ By the Ilth Eliz., C. 1,. S. 1. (the attainder of Shane O'Neill), it was enacted thai
Shane O'Neill should forfeit to her Majesty his lands and goods, and that his blood
should be C9rrupt and disabled for ever. S. 2, made the use of the name O'Neill
treason. S. 4 provided that whereas divors of the lords and captains of Ulster,
as the septs of the O'Neills of Clandeboy, etc., the 0'Hanlon3,MacMahon3,MaoGuin-
nesses, etc., had been at the commandment of Shane O'Neill in his traitorous war,
it was enacted that her Majesty should hold and possess, in the right of the Crown,
the County of Tyrone, of Clandeboy, etc., and all the lands and tenements belong-
ing or appertaining to any of the persons aforesaid, or to their kinsmen or adherents,
in any of the countries, or territoi'ies, before specified. It is reasonably plain here
that the only persons whose lands were escheated were Shane O'Neill's and the other
persons named and their kinsmen and adherents, whatever construction might be put
upon the words " kinsmen and adherents." Possibly in a penal statute they would
be held void for uncertainty. After the Pardon, new Letters Patent were granted
to the Lords of Countries, and Davis' proposition was to evict the under-tenants,
and vest their interest as freeholders in the Crown, and then transfer these free-
holds to Scotch and English planters, until which transfer the Crown would be
under-tenant apparently to the Lords of Countries. Nowadays, we have no doubt
the pardon, proclamation, and new Letters Patent would be held to re-establish all
the interests. But we are far from saying that Davis did not take a sound working
view of the question, as things stood in his time. The judges were then " remov-
ables." And Irish judges holding office during the King's pleasure would be alow
to incur the displeasure of the King's Attorney-General for Ireland.
By the 12th Eliz., C. IV., S.I., it was provided that upon the offer of any "the
pretended lords, gentlemen, or freeholders of the Irishrie, or degenerated men
of English name holding their lands by Irish custom, and not by tenure, according
to her Majesty's laws," the Lord Deputy might accept a surrender of their lands,
and grant their lands to them by Letters Patent to hold of the Queen. By
the '2nd Sec. — The rights of all persons in the surrendered lands are saved in the
fullest and most explicit manner.
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 241
days before Christmas he went to Litford to prosecute the Earls
and their adherents on charges of high treason,
"The jury," he wrote, "were twenty-three gentlemen of the
best quality and distinction in the county (Donegal), Sir
Cahir O'Dogherty, who, next to the Earl of Tyrconnell, has the
largest territory there, being foreman. Of the twenty-three
jurors, thirteen were of the Irish nation and only ten English,
in order that there might be no exception of partiality in com-
pounding the jury. The Bills were read publicly in English
and Irish, though that were needless and not usual in taking
of indictments. It was explained that an indictment was an
accusation and not a conviction." ^
The flight of the Earls, if not explained, was persuasive
"prima facie evidence, and was, no doubt, pressed home forcibly
by Davis. The King's Proclamation (November 15th, 1607)
states : " We do profess that the only ground and motive of their
high contempt in these men's departure hath been the private
knowledge and terror of their own guiltiness " (p. GS). There
were, however, other reasons for the flight. The earls fled, not
because they meditated rebellion, which, under the circum-
stances, would have been sheer madness, but because neither
' A copy of the indictment subscribed " a true bill," with the namea of the
grand jurors attached, was sent by Davis to Salisbury (/n Cal. II., 556). Amongst
the thirteen Irish we find, besides Sir Cahir O'Doherty, the names of Donal
M'Sweeny, of Fauad, and Donough M'Sweeny, of Ba'iagh ; John ua Clerigh (Kil-
barron Castle), and Lowry (Luguid ?) ua Clerigh, (of Bailj'clerigh). Of the two latter,
to whose kindred the writer belongs, we are in a position to say that they were
treated as mere tenants-at-will, squatters, " having no English name or sui-name,"
and expelled from Donegal.
The project of Plantation of the six counties of Ulster provided that " the
swordsmen were to be transplanted into such other parts of the kingdom as b^'
means of the waste lands therein were fittest for to receive them — namely, into
Connacht and some parts of Munster, where they are to be dispersed and not
planted together in one place ; and such swordsmen as have not followers or cattle
of their own to bo disposed of in his Majesty's service." — G. Hill, Plant, of Ulster,
96. All the " kindred' ' Clerigh who answered the description of swordsmen — we give
this as a single instance to illustrate the procedure — were with their families
evicted. They were allowed to take their cattle with them and M'ent, driving
them before them, to the borders of Limerick. There is, at the present day, in the
barony of Kilnamanagh, a district called Foily Cleary (Cilery's Eock), and we havo
no doubt they were transplanted into this district, which was then a mountainous
waste. The " scholars " remained behind in their beloved Donegal, and took refuge
in the mountains. The Chief of the Four Masters was known before joining one
or both the Orders (first and third) of St. Francis (without, however, taking Orders)
as Tadg an t-Sleibe (Tadg of the Mountains).
The author cannot speak here from immediate family traditions, as his father
died when he was an infant. But when he was a boy, nearly fifty years ago, he
heard these particulars from a wortb.y priest of his name and kindred, who said he
had them from his grandfather. The final " g " of Clerig is aspirated, as in
the Nonb. In Munster the final " g " is not aspirated, but oronouncod hard.
R
242 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
their liberty nor their lives were safe in Ireland. Even after
their flight they were not safe from the poison or the dagger
of the hired assassin. The evidence of this has recently come
to light from the archives of Venice, and is to be found in the
Calender of State Papers.
On May the 25th, Sir Henry Wotton, the English Ambassa-
dor in Venice, wrote to the Cabinet. After referring to the
assassination of Henry IV. (May 14th, 1610), he observed : —
I recollect that among the other officers whom her majesty sent to
Ireland was Colonel N orris, a very brave gentleman. He desired to
end the business as soon as possible, and, as it was impossible to come
to a pitched battle with the Irish, whose habit is to strike and then fly
into the dense forests, where they are safe, he thought the only way to
finish up the matter quickly was to find some Irish and to offer them a
reward if they would kill Tyrone, and so end the business. This was
a good, just and laudable plan to secure the slaying of so great a rebel.
But it was a notable fact that for all that he offered the greatest
rewards he never could find a man who would slay the Earl.
There is not the smallest doubt that if the Colonel who promised ten
thousand pounds sterling, and even more, to the man who should kill
the Earl and escape had had authority to promise paradise on death
the Earl would most assuredly not escape.^
It would be difficult, if not impossible, for the assassin to
escape unless he used poison.
At the time of the flight of the Earls Sir Henry Totton
was the English ambassador at Venice. The fugitives pro-
ceeded through Flanders, Lorraine and Switzerland, by the St.
Gothard pass to Milan. Wotton promptly conveyed the
intelligence to King James, and soon after, under the signature
Ottamo Baldi, wrote the letter of the 24th April, 1608^'^. In
this he informs the King that an Italian, a Lombard, of middle
age, well clothed and well fashioned, came to him four days
previously and delivered to him a credential ticket which he
encloses, and proposed on behalf of an unnamed person of
spirit and understanding for such a business, to assassinate
O'Neill. No names were to be asked until the proposal was
accepted, which made Wotton "troubled and cautious."
However he writes : —
Next I told him that though the thing he proposed might, no doubt,
be done very justly (jthe parties standing in actual proclaimed rebellion),
yet it was somewhat questionable whether it might be done honourablj,
9 Calendar of Slate Papers from Archives of Venice. Vol. XI,— i93, 68 (1904).
w Irish Calendar. Vol. II.— 657 (1608-1610), (1904).
THB TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 2'13
your majesty having not hitherto (for aught come to knowledge,)
proceeded to the open proscription of them to destruction abroad,
neither was it a course so familiar and frequent Avith us as in other
states. I was ready to spoak forward when he interrupted me,
methought somewhat eagerly, saying that the gentleman who had sent
him knew not taute distiniioni. The sum and substance was this that
if he might but be assured it would be well taken by your Majesty the*
thing should be done. And then for his conscience that would do it
let his Majesty leave it to him {Sua Maj. lasci far a lui), just in the
style, as I must confess, of a fellow that were fit for the purpose. I
replied that since the point which he only or most required to know
was how acceptable it would be, I would take the liberty to tell him
mine own conceit that services of this kind unto princes were commonly
most obligatory {i.e. obliging), when done without their knowledge, I
understand you [Intendo vos, signoria) said he smilingly. I answered
that he might peradventure understand me so (too 1) far, and therefore
with his leave I would explain that what I had said I meant not
directly of your Majesty but of the general rules and affection of other
princes in like cases.
The stranger refused to give his name, but left a note which
Wotton received. It indicated : —
How he might hear from me addressing my letters to one in Mantua,
his friend, without any superscription. As for my part, 1 have left
him to the motions of his own will, and as your Majesty shall be
further pleased to command me I will proceed in it,
Venice, 24th of April, 1608.
Nothing further is known at present about this nefarious
business. No person was ever brought to trial for the alleged high
treason. The whole proceeding was, in fact, a lever de rideau for
the confiscation of the estates of the inhabitants in the various
countries of the six counties,^^ and elsewhere, and for the pretence
that the inferior tenants had no estate at all in their holdings,
but were mere tenants-at-will or squatters. If they were free-
holders their freeholds would not be destroyed by the treason
of the lords of the countries. After the findinor of the Bill the
plan of confiscation, eviction, and plantation was considered
and settled in all its parts, the king himself giving his gracious
attention to the distribution of the plunder in equitable pro-
portions between his Scotch and English subjects. The Deputy
and the Attorney-General were to receive large grants as a
matter of course. Davis got 5,500 acres, and Chichester the
whole barony of Inishowen, the town of Dungannon, and a
** The Six Counties were Armagh, Tyrone, Derry, Donegal, Fermanagh and
Cavan.
244 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
vast tract of laud near Belfast, the last-mentioned, tliouo'li not
within the six counties, being, no doubt, confiscated land
They were duly appointed, with others, Commissioners of Plan-
tation for Ulster. Davis gives an account of their proceedings
in a letter dated Sept. 24th, 1610, which should be read in
conjunction with his letter printed above in italics to under-
stand rightly the iniquity of his proceedings : —
We began at Cavan, where (as it f alleth out on all matters of import-
ance) we found the first access and entry into the business the most
difficult, for the inhabitants of this county bordering upon Meath, and
having many acquaintances and alliances with the gentlemen of the
English Pale, called theynselves freeholders and pretended that they had
estates of inheritance in their lands, which their chief lords could not
forfeit by their attainder, whereas, in truth, they ne^'er had any estates
according to the rules of the common law, hut only a so-ambling and
transitory possession, as all other Irish natives within the kingdom.
When the proclamation was published touching their removal (which
was done in the Public Session House, the Lord Deputy and the Com-
missioners being present), a lawyer of the Pale, retained by the
inhabitants, endeavoured to maintain that they had estates of inherit-
tance, and in their name desired two things — first, that they might be
admitted to traverse the offices that had been found of those lords ;
secondly, that they might have the benefit of a proclamation made
about five years since whereby their persons, lands, and goods were
received into his Majesty's protection. To this, by my Lord Deputy's
commandment, I made answer that it was manifest that they had no
estate of inheritance, either in their chiefries or in their tenancies, for
the chiefry never descended to the eldest son of the chieftain, but the
strongest of the sept ever entered into it ; neither had they any certain
estates in their tenancies, though they seemed to run in a course of
gavelkind, for the chief of the sept, once in two or three years, shuffle d
and changed their possessions by making a new partition amongst them,
wherein the bastards had always their portions as well as the legitimate,
and therefore the custom hath been adjudged void inlaw by the opinion
of all the judges in the kingdom. Hereunto two other arguments were
added to prove that they had no estates of inheritance. One, that they
never esteemed lawful matrimony to the end that they might have
lawful heirs ; the other, that they never built any houses or planted
any orchards or gardens or took any care of their posterities, as they
would have done if they had had estates descendible to lawful heirs.
These reasons answered both their petitions, for if they had no estate
inlaw they could show no title, and without showing a title no man
may be admitted to traverse an office ; and, again, if they had no estate
in the land which they possessed, the proclamation which received
their lands into his Majesty's protection does not give them any better
estate than they had before. Other arguments were used to show that
his Majesty might justly dispose of those lands, as he has now done, in
laio, in conscience, and in honour, wherewith the)' seemed not unsatisfied
in reason though in passion they remained ill-contented, being grieved
THE TRIBAL OCCUPIER AND SIR JOHN DAVIS. 245
to leave their possessions to strangers which their septs had so long
after the Irish manner enjoyed. Howbeit, the Lord Deputy mixed
threats with entreaty, precibusque minas regalUer addit, and they
promised to give way to the undertakers.
Untruths, it is said, are serviceable and highly prized —
dans la hawte politique}'^ On a lower plane, within the sphere
of domestic politics, we disbelieve utterly in the utility of the
mensonge utile. Official lying is at all times detestable, and
is at best but a sorry substitute for intelligent and capable
statesmanship. A day of reckoning comes sooner or later,
followed in inexorable sequence by stern retribution. And
surely fraud never comes in a more maddening guise than
when the forms of justice are prostituted by its ministers to
further unworthy policy and secure for themselves dishonour,
able gains. The delirium and deplorable massacre of 1641 was
the outcome of this deplorable chicanery.^^
^* " If honesty will do, let us be honest; if duplicity is necessary, let us be
rogues." — Frederick the Great.
^^ It would be a safe conjecture that the number of those slain in cold blood at
the beginning of the rebellion could hardly have much exceeded four or five
thousand, while about twice that number may have perished from ill-treatment.
Gairdner, Vol. X, '69. Lecky, Vol. II, 153.
[ 246 3
CHAPTER XVI.
THE LIA FAIL— THE STONE OF DESTINY.
AT the reception of the Faith the social organisation of Erin
was, as we have seen, in the tribal stage of evolution. The
line of Eremon had emerged from being primus inter pares,
and was then predominant. It held Tara and Ailech, ruled in
Connacht and in Leinster, and made alliance by marriage with
Munster and Little Ulster. Everything seemed to point to the
speedy fusion of the clans into a nation and the rise of a monarch
or an imperator. A statesman like Louis XL, or Bismarck,
would, undoubtedly, have effected the transformation. The
physical conditions were eminently favourable for the establish-
ment of a strong central government. The country was not
divided by mountain ranges or other natural barriers intc
cantons, like Greece or Switzerland. Rivers, flowing south,
north, east, and west, diverged, as it were, from a central
point, and, unlike rivers, such as the Loire and the Rhone,
flowed with an easy current, in a full channel. This was the
result partly of the moderate elevation of the central plain (the
area between Dublin and Galway not exceeding a height of 250
feet above the level of the sea), and partly of the existence of
large areas of peat bogs and forests. These bogs acted as sponges,
retaining the rainfall and distributing it gradually into the
river beds, and prevented the excessive and disastrous floodings
to which other river basins, such as that of the Loire, were
subject. Nature had thus prepared safe and commodious high-
ways for internal communication. The coast was provided
with excellent harbours and landing places, which were, as we
have seen, frequented by traders and dealers from foreign
parts. During the first millennium of our era, according to
the best guess we can make, the population never exceeded
850,000, which we would distribute roughly, thus— 200,000 to
Munster, i.e., the two Munsters, 200,000 to Ulster, i.e., the two
Ulsters, and 150,000 each to Leinster, Meath, and Connacht.^
* The peat bogs occupy 1,772,450 acres, nearly one-ninth of the entire area of
the country. They are antiseptic, and, unlike the feus and morasses in other
lands, are not injurioua to health, but rather the reverse. No malaria is found in
THE LIA FAIL— THE STONE OF DESTINY. 247
Within this central plain stood two famous hills — Uisneach
and Tara. Uisneach was near the true centre of Erin, about
nine miles west of Mullingar. It was, according to the legends,
the oldest capital, if we may so call it. Afterwards Tara was
preferred, and was selected by the Gael for the residence of
the Ard-Bigh.
Tara stood on the summit of a grassy slope, 500 feet over
the sea level, 200 above the surrounding plain, 2G miles N.W.
of Dublin, and 5 J- miles S.E. of Navan, which is situated at the
confluence of the Blackwater and the Boyne. It was on this
hill that the high kings were inaugurated. In all the tribal
P elections of importance in Erin an inauguration stone was in
common use. In other respects the ceremony varied in
details.'^ This custom prevailed commonly among the Nordic
nations. The kings of Sweden were inaugurated on the
"great stone," still seen on the grave of Odin, near Upsala.
" Seven stone seats for the emperor and his electors mark the
spot where the Lahn joins the Rhine at Lahnstein." The
Anglo-Saxon kings were crowned on the " King's Stone," near
the Thames. The Lord of the Isles was inaugarated on such
astono. In Spenser's View of Ireland we find (p. 11) —
Eudox — Do they not use any ceremony at the election 1
Iren — They used to place him that shall be their captaiae upon a
atone always reserved for that purpose, and placed commonly upon a hill,
on some of which I have seen formed and engraven a foot, which they say
was the measure of their first captaine's foot, whereon he, standing,
connection with them. As fuel they may become at some future time a valuable
national asset. Reckoning them, however, for the present as waste lands, the
total of such in Ireland is less in proportion than the waste lands of Great Britain.
There is no reason to believe that at the time we speak of the forests prevented
intercommunication. Large clearances are described in our texts from the remotest
period. Fynes Moryson, who was Secretary to the Lord Deputy Mountjoy
(1599-1603) says in his description of Ireland : — " In time of peace the Irish
transport (export) good quantity of corn ; yet they may not transport it without
license lest upon any sudden rebellion the King's forces and his good subjects
should want corn. Ulster and the westerr^ parts of Munster yield vast woods.
But I confess myself to have been deceived in the common fame that all Ireland is
woody, having found in my long journey from Armagh to Kinsale few or no woods
by the way, excepting the great woods of Offaly, and some low, shrubby places
which they call glens. — History II., 370.
"^ At the inauguration of the O'Dowda. — The privilege of first drinking at the
banquet was given by O'Dowda to O'Caemhain, and he was not to drink until he
first presented it to the file, i.e , MacFirbis. The weapons, battle dress, and steed
of O'Dowda after his nomination were given to O'Caemhain, and the weapons and
battle dress of O'Caemhain to Mac Firbis. It was not lawful ever to nominate — ■
that is, proclaim — O'Dowda until O'Caemhain and Mac Firbis pronounced the
name and until Mac Firbis held the wand over the head of O'Dowda. After
O'Caemhain and Mac Firbis every cleric and coarb and every chief of a district
pronounced the name — O'Dowda. Hy Fiachra, 440.
24-8 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
takes an oath to preserve all the ancint former customs of the country
inviolable and to deliver up the possession peaceably to his Tanist,
and then hath a wand delivered to him by some whose proper office
that is ; after which, descending from the stone, he turneth himself
round thrice forward and thrice backward.^
The legendary foundation of the High Kingship is traced
back to the Firvolce. Slainge, the eldest brother, who took
possession of the country from the Boyne to the meeting of the
three rivers near Waterford, " was elected king over them by his
four brothers and the Firvolce in general." * It was this entry,
probably, that led Thierry to state that "there was in Erin a king
superior to all the rest, who was called the great king, or the
king of the country, and who was chosen by a general assembly
of the chiefs of the different provinces, but thiselectivepresident
of the national confederation swore to the whole nation the
same oath which the chiefs of the tribes swore to their respec-
tive tribes, that of inviolably observing the ancient laws and
hereditary customs." ^
The statement that the Ard Righ was chosen by popular
election of some sort by the provincial kings and under-kings
and by the " estates of the realm " is found also in other
writers. Within the historic period, unfortunately, no such
mode of election is recorded in our texts.
From Laeghaire to Maelseachlann (429-1022) there were
thirty-nine high kings, all of whom, except Brian Boru, were
of the line of Eremon, and all, except Olioll Moll (a nephew)
were descendants of Niall of the Nine Hostages. NialPs son,
Crimthan, and his descendants number 16, Eogan and his
descendants 13, Conal and his descendants 7, Laeghaire 1, and
Cairbre 1 ^ — total 38. How were these High Kings chosen ?
The succession to the High Kingship in Erin was not
hereditary, but selective. The Ard Righ was chosen from the
royal stock, and the eligible candidates were styled rig-domna,
i.e., royal material. A successor was sometimes chosen in the life-
time of the reigning monarch. He was styled a Tanist (U^tMif ce)
= second, i.e., next to succeed. The following genealogical
table, which we have compiled partly from one carefully pre-
pared with dates by M. D'Arbois, and partly from Reeves'
* And Bee O'Donovan's Hy Fiachra, 458, for interesting details, and Reeves
Adamnan, 198.
* F. M., 3266 A.M.
^ Norman Conquest, II., 123.
® A list of the High Kings, with dates, will be found in the Appendix.
THE LIA FAIL — THE STONE OF DESTINY.
249
Adamnan, will be found useful in examining the course of
selective succession of the kings for two centuries, and also for
the pedigree and relationships of Saint ColumbaJ
o
pq
<
o
o
o
O
o
c3
o
o
- a> .
'3
e3
a
3
-bD-
'3
u
o
CD
ri
o
- o .
^ oo
1* OS
-fi IM
—1 «:-
d -f
.— -"^
o^-^
O 1
'^ 33
^^o
• ^ ;o
■* ■^
O^
<3 -3
J 1
o
a
so 'J
■'a>
_ o ■
I
p.
OS
a
o
03
"Q-
d
Ml
o
a "*
- in >0
<I>
C
'o
.h CO
5?^
■3 CO
bpo
o
10
13
- to g .ii Tt<
a
S
-o
5o I
S ^
— tj -
"d
o
o
o
Q
- o-
a
o
-S
'S
3
H
pq
P3
O
I— I
Q
P4
a
0
^
^
3
H
1— (
3
P
cc
o_
t-i
— o-
E=4
F-H
03
0
3
H
0
0
W
f^
a
03
o
o
0
-'a
4)
cq
3
'TJ.
S>
.■a_fo
3 03
An examination of this table of High Kings proves that
the succession was not hereditary, but selective from the royal
stock, and establishes, in our judgment, that where the
' Sev. Celt. XXII., p. 364, and Reeves' Adaimian, 251.
250 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
succession was peaceable, after the time of Niall of the Nine
Hostages, the selection was made by the tribesmen, who are
commonly referred to as the Ui Neill. There is no trace of
federal election. The man who became chieftain of the
Ui Neill took possession of Tara and the hostages, and the
provincial kings had to submit to his authority. This was
when the succession was peaceable. When there were rival
candidates in the field the provincial kings had a very effective
voice in the selection by joining forces with one or other of the
rivals. But, as we have seen, up till the time of Brian Boru,
no man outside the royal stock of the Ui Neill succeeded
in reaching the High Kingship. " Maelseachlan ( + 1022) was the
last King of Ireland of Irish blood that had a crown; yet there
were seven kings after without crown before the coming in of
the English." These were Righ-go-fresabhraidh, i.e., kings with
opposition, or, rather, under protest. " They were reputed to be
absolute monarchies in this manner : If he were of Leah Cuin,
or Con's halfe in Deale {i.e., in quantity, or extent), and had one
province of Leahmoye, or Moah's halfe in Deale at his com-
mand, he was counted to be of sufficient power to be King of
Taragh, or Ireland ; but if the party were of Leahmoye, if he
could not command all Leahmoye and Taragh with the loppe
(i.e., the belt of country) hereunto belonging, and the province
of Ulster or Connaught (if not both) he would not be sufficient
to be king of all. Dermot McMoylenemoe could command,
Leahmoye, Meath, and Connaught and Ulster, therefore by the
judgment of all he was reputed sufficient monarch of the
whole." ^ These are the observations, in all probability, of
MacGeoghan himself, and not of the annalist, and must
be understood to apply only to the period of the High Kings
" with opposition," out of which, under favourable circum-
stances, a central hereditary monarchy would, probably, have
finally emerged.
We shall now examine the table of kings in some
detail. Eocaid Muighmedoin left eight sons, who had issue,
who became divided into the Northern Ui Neill (Eogan, Conall
Cairbre, and Enda Find) ; and the Southern Ui Neill (Laeghaire,
Crimthann, Fiachra, and Maine).^ On the death of Crimthann,
* Murphy, S. J., AnnaU of Clonmacnoise, 176 and 171.
* Eocaid was, as already stated, succeeded by hia brother-in-law, Crimthann,
8oa of Fidach, of the royal family of Munster.
\
THE LIA FAIL— THE STONE OF DESTINY. 251
Niall, though the youngest son of Eocaid, and not born of the
" one wife," but of a Saxon woman, succeeded peaceably.
There is no mention of a feis or convention of provincial kings
at the time, and it may, we think, be assumed that the election
was by the Clanna Neill alone. He was succeeded peaceably
by Dathi, son of his uncle, Fiachra. Again, there is no mention
of any feis or convention. He was succeeded peaceably by
Laeghaire. There was no feis or convention then, but in the 26th
year of his reign Laeghaire celebrated the feis at Tara. He
was succeeded peaceably by Olioll Moll, a son of Dathi. There
was no feis or convention then, but Olioll held afterwards one,
or, some say two, celebrations of the feis at Tara. After he
had reigned twenty years Lugaid, the son of Laeghaire, claimed
the throne, and formed a league with Fergus Cearbheal, son of
Conal Crimthann, of the Northern Ui Neill, Muirchertach Mor
Mac Erca, son of Muiredach, son of Eogan, of the Northern
Ui Neill, and with Fiachra. son of the king of Dal-Aradia.^*'
A fierce battle was fought (478 A.D.) at Ocha, in Meath.
Olioll was defeated and slain, and the supremacy of the Ui
Neill was firmly established.^^ The King of Dal-Aradia was
rewarded with territories on the east and the west of the River
Bann. Lugaid then mounted the throne, and, after a reign of
twenty-five years, was killed by lightning. He was succeeded
peaceably by Muirchertach Mor Mac Erca, the grandson of
Eogan. After a reign of twenty-four years Muirchertach was
assassinated by Sen, daughter of Sighe, in revenge for her
father, whom he had slain.
He was succeeded peaceably by Tuathal Maelgarbh, grandson
of Cairbre, son of Niall. In his reign was fought the battle of
Sligo (537) by Fergus and Domhnall, the sons of Muirchertach,
and by Ainmire, the son of Sedna, and Anmidh, the son of
Duach, and the Northern Ui Neill, against the Hy Fiachrach,
in which the latter were routed, and Eogan Bel, who had been
^'^ A7m. Ulst., F.M., A.D, 478, who add that Cinmthann, King of Leinster,
joined the League.
1^ The battle of Eiblin gained by Muirchertach, son of Ere, the battle of
Magh Ailbe (Kildare) gained over Leinster, and the battle of Aidne over Connact,
and the battles of Almhain and Cenneach over Leinster, and the plundering of
Clia (Idrone Carlow) Tigernach.
bo befc 514LIA Ua neilL l^. jiaIIa moije tTluniAti CeAnn eActd'O.
He bore away the hostages of the Hy Neill and the hostages of the Plains of
Munster.
252 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
King of Comnact for thirty-five years, was slain.^^ The victors
in this battle were the warriors whom St. Columba is said by
some, erroneously, as we hope to show, to have incited to fight the
battle of Cul Dreimhne, a few miles north of Sligo, in 555.
Fergus and Domhnall succeeded to the throne in 558 A.D. The
battles of Ocha and Sligo were disastrous events, from a
political point of view — victories gained by the Ui Neill over
their near kinsmen of Connact, cutting off vigorous and
spreading branches from the parent stock, dividing the race
of Eremon into hostile camps and placing grave if not insur-
mountable difficulties in the way of fusing the Gael into a
nation.
In addition to the tribal vote there was, in Pagan times, an
electoral voice of decisive weight heard at the inauguration of
the new king. We refer, of course, to the famous Lia Fail or
Stone of Destiny.
According to the legend the Dedannans brought with them to
Erin the sword and spear of Lug, the cauldron of the Dagda,
and — most precious of all the treasures — the Enchanted Stone of
the Sun, the Lia Fail}^ Hence the island was in after times
called Innis Fail. The stone used to shout under the Kin or of
Erin, saith the old duan quoted by Keating, i.e., if he was the
rightful king. It was prophesied that the Scots should hold
sway wherever the stone should be found :
Ni fallat fa turn, Scoti quocumque locorum
Invenient lapidem regaare tenentur ibidem.
What has become of the Stone of Dostinj^- ? One tradition is
that it was taken to Scotland, that the Gaelic King there might
be inaugurated upon it. The time of its removal cannot be
exactly fixed. It was certainly after the death of Diarmaid
mac Cerbhael, who died in 565 A.D. The view in the Ogygia,
(p. 45), therefore seems plausible — that it was sent by Aedh
Finliath, Ard-righ (861 to 877), to his father-in-law, Kenneth
mac Alpin, when he defeated the Picts, A.D. 844.^* He was
^'^ Tuathal was assassinated (538) and peaceably succeeded by Diarmaid, son
of Cerrbeoil, son of Crimthann, son of Niall. The assassin, Maelmor, was the son
of the mother of Diarmaid. {Tigernach.)
^^ Dolmens III., 1160 — " There can be no doubt Fal was a sun-god."
'^ Flann of the monastery, if e cec 1115 t^oj;Ab 11156 5coinT)e'T)e J^Aetjetib.
In the seventh year of his reign Kenneth is said in the Scottish chronicle to
have transferred relics of St. Columba to a church he had built near Scone. This
was probably the final carrying out of the arrangement by which the supremacy of
lona was transferred in Erin to Kells, and in Scotland to Dunkeld. — Skene, I.. 310.
THE LIA FAIL — THE STONE OF DESTINY. 253
the King of the Dal-riada of Alba, and after his victory united
the territory of the Picts to his own, and marching to Scone,
near Perth, was inaugurated there as the King " who possessed
the kingdom of Scone o£ the Gael.''
There is at this day (O'Flaherty writes) in the royal throne at
Westminster a stone called Jacob's Stone. On this the kings of Ireland
formerly took the omens of their investiture. There is an old tradition
that it was called " fatal," because the princes used to try their fate on
it. If it would make a noise under the king who sat on it, it was an
infallible sign of his accession ; if it was silent, it excluded him from any
hope. Since the Incarnation of our blessed Lord it has produced no
such oracle ; and you can see in Eusebius' Book the delusive oracles that
were silenced. The time that it came to the Scots of Britain from Erin
cannot be ascertained ; but if I may be allowed to conjecture, it was in
the time of Kenneth, who conquered and subjected to the empire of the
Scots the Pictish nation, and deposited that stone in the abbey at Scone,
in the country of the Picts, when he transferred his palace, and it vei'y
probably was transmitted by Aed Finliath, the son-in-law of Kenneth,
who was afterwards King of Ireland, as an auspicious omen.i^
There is no reason to think that any of the northern Ui
Neill went to Tara to be inaugurated after the time of Diar-
maid, nor is there any evidence, so far aa we are aware, that
the stone was ever taken to Aileach for the coronation, and it
would, we think, have been good policy on the part of the
northern branch to disfranchise this supposititious elector
altogether by sending him to reside permanently at Scone.
Many, however, including Petrie, thought that the Stone of
Destiny remained in Ireland, and was stiil in Tara of the Kings.
He thought the pillar stone known as the Bod Ferguis was
the Lia Fail. 16
He relied mainly as his strongest proof on a poem by Kineth
O'Hartigan, 985 A.D., who says : —
The stone on which are my two heels
From it is called Inis Fail.
It was at the side of the Mound of the Hostages that the celebrated
£3^
15 Ofjygia (Hely), 67.
^^ The following passage, an '■ inset " is found in the Irish Abridgment of the
" Expugaatio Hiberaira," translated from a fragment of a fifteenth century vellura
by Whitley Stokes. Ewj. Hist. Rev., vol. xx., par. 571.
The King (H.II.), left Ireland and went to the city of St. David, and there
happened to be on the north side of the chui'ch a stone, called the speaking stone,
like unto the Lia Fail which is in Tara, 10 feet in length, 7 in breadth, and 1 foot
in thickness. A dead body was brought to the stone and it spoke thereunder, and
then it clove asunder, and that cleft is to be seen there still. Merlin prophesied
that it should speak under him who should be king of Ireland. The king went to
It, but it did not speak under him, and he was displeased, and was accusing
Merlin.
254 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
coronation stone called the Lia Fail was located at the time of the
writers already referred to, and it remained in the same situation till
some years after 1798, when it was removed to its present position in
the rath called Forradh to mark the grave of the rebels slain at Tara
in that year. The Lia Fail is spoken of not only by those authorities
but by all the ancient Irish writers, in such a manner as to leave no
doubt that it remained in its original situation at the time that they
wrote.
But other texts which are decisive the other way have since
been found, e.g., "It was the Tuatha Di Danan brought with
them the great pAl, that is the Stone of Knowledge that was
(in li4 ^TLi t)A P|\) pf 1 CionpAig, from which Magh Fal is, {i.e.,
called) on Erin." Booh of Leinster, page 9, col. a, line 13.
And, again, in the " Talk with the Old Men." " This, then,
and the \,\a lpA\l that was there were the two Wonders of Tara.
And Diarmait Mac Cerbheoil asks who was it that lifted that
flag, or carried it away out of Erin ? " Answer, " It was a
young hero of great spirit who ruled over " — What followed is,
unfortunately, wanting in all the MS.^'^
T. O. Russell has some pertinent and very judicious remarks
on Petrie's views in his interesting notice of Tara : —
Another strong objection against the pillar-stone in Tara being the
Lia Fail is its shape. The real Lia Fail was intended to be stood upon
by the chief King at his inauguration ; but the most flat-footed monarch
that ever ruled Ireland would have considerable difficulty in standing
steadily on the Coirthe in Tara, even if it were prostrate, for it is round
and not flat. Judging from its height above the ground it cannot be
much less than eight feet in length. Lia is always applied to a flag-
stone, both in ancient and modern Gaelic. The stone under the coro-
nation seat at Westminster is a real lia or flag-stone ; the stone in Tara
is a Coirthe or pillar-stone.^^
The Lia Fail enclosed in the Coronation Chair at West-
minster is of an oblong form, but irregular, measuring twenty-
six inches in length, six three-quarter inches in breadth, and
ten and a half inches in thickness.^^
The ancient distich :
Ni fallat fatum Scoti quoquncque locorum
Invenient lapidem regnare tenentur ibidem,
is said to have been cut or engraven on the stone by command of
Kenneth MacAlpin, but no trace of an inscription can be
" Irishe Texte, vol. 4, p. xiii. and p. 224 (Stokes' Aoadamh na Senorach)
Bilva Oaedelica, S. H. O'Qrady, vol, ii., p. 264.
^^ Antiquitiea of Ireland.
*' We take these particulars from Neale's Westminster Abbey, p, 79.
THE LIA FAIL — THE STONE OF DESTINY. 255
found. If the verses were really engraved by King Kenneth's
order, it is most likely to have been done either on the wooden
chair, wherein he originally had the stone enclosed (but not any
remains of which are known to be preserved), or, as is more
probable, on a metal plate fastened to the upper surface of the
stone ; in which there is a rectangular groove or indent, mea-
suring fourteen inches by nine inches, and from one-eighth to
one-fourth of an inch in depth, as if purposely cut or roughly
chiselled out for the fixing of the edge of such plate, either
with cement or melted lead. There is likewise at one corner
a small cross + slightly cut. It has at each end a circular iron
handle aflSxed to the stone itself, so that it may be lifted up.
The Coronation Stone was examined in 1865 by Professor
Ramsey, Director of the Geological Survey of England, and a
small portion of it chemically tested at his request. His report
will be found in the second edition (1868) of Stanley's Memo-
rials of Westminster Abbey, p. 564. The effect of his report,
which is too long to be given here, is that it came from some
old red sandstone formation, such as is to be found at Scone
and at DunstafFnage, " but," he adds, " as there are plenty of
red sand stones in Ireland (from which it is said to have been
brought), it may be possible to prove precisely its origin," We
think the fact of the local stone being old red stone is against
the claim of Scone and DunstafFnage. The maxim " ignotum
pro mirifico," applies to stone as well as to other things.
A prophetic sandstone setting up to be able to discriminate
between a true and a false king would have no honour in a
country of such stones. The local stone at Tara is limestone,
and an enchanted stone, coming from a far-awr^y land, as the
tradition ran, was bound to be something quite different.
Red sandstone is found in many regions ; it is plentiful in
the north of Spain, for instance, and if the Lia Fail had
acquired a reputation there before the sons of the Soldior
Golam left for Erin, they most likely carried it with them.^<*
^° Robertson, J., wrote a letter to Dean Stanley on the subject of the Corona-
tion Stone, which is printed in the second edition of his Memorials, p. 557. Th»
Dean refers to it as an " additional proof of the extraordinary fulness and
accuracy with which he met every question relating to Scottish history." Robertson
points out, as against the view that the Lia Fail was brought to Alba by Fergus
Mac Ere about 500 A.D., (1) that in the account of the inauguration of his successor
Aidan (A.D. 574) the stone does not appear. The coronation was by Columba at
lona, and the account by his successor Cummin the Fair ; (2) that Adamnan
(Abbot, 679-704) gives an account of another coronation in which the stone is not
mentioned {Reeves, p. 233), He giiggests that the Coronation Stone was the pillow
256 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
There is no suggestion in Gaelic tradition that the enchanter]
stone disappeared in any other way, and there is no suggestion
in the traditions of Alba that the stone was acquired in any
other way. The tradition running with the custody of the
stone in Alba, varying and inconsistent in detail, as is the way
with such evidence, is uniform in this, that the stone was
brought by the Gael from Erin to Alba and was finally placed
at Scone by Kenneth MacAlpin. Baldred Bisset (1301, the
earliest notice), Fordun, the Chronicon Rythmicum, Wyntoun,
Scotichronicon, Blaud, Harvey, Bocce, all agree in this, and
Skene, who made the Coronation Stone the subject of a special
treatise, does not quote a single statement from any writer to
the effect that the stone came from any other place. He
relies on the discrepancies in detail, on the mythical character
of the " early wanderings" of the stone with the Gael, and on
the silence of some authors about it. For instance, he says
neither Cummin the White nor Adamnan say anything about
it when Columba "ordained" Aidan ; throughout the whole
description of the ordination there is not a single word about
the Lia Fail. But why should there be ? The ordination by
Columba was not an " inauguration but a spiritual act." " In
the words of ordination," writes Adamnan, " he prophesied the
future for sons, grandsons, and great grandsons, and placing
his {i.e., Columba's) hand on his head, ordaining, blessed him.'^^
of St. Columba. A flagRtone would not be suited for even a penitential pillow.
We may be sure Columba's pillow was round, like the wooden pillows commonly
used up till Tudor times.
^^ Martene thought — we may humbly add our view (though Bishop Reeves
thought otherwise) that Martene thought rightly — that the mode of ordination was
prescribed in the " liber vitreus " presented to Columba by the angel. — Reeves'
Adamnan, 19S.
The earliest notice we have, writes Bishop Reeves, of ecclesiastical interference
in the coufirmatiou of royalty in Ireland is found in the Annals of Ulster, A.D.
992, where it is recorded that the coarb of St. Patrick, t>o ef te^ gt^A-o Kis Tpo\\ Aoxi
triAC "OoiiinAilL i ^lA-onice Sajtica pAC|tAic (conferred the order of kingship on
Aedh, the son of Doimiall, in presence of the congregation of Patrick). This,
however, was only the case of a provincial kingdom, probably the commencement
of the practice. — Adamnan, 199.
Martene adds — " Sed in iEdani beuedictione illud singulare occurrit quod
noa ab episcopo sed ab abbate fnorit ordinatus." — De Antiq, Eccles. II. 10.
[ 257 3
CHAPTER XVII.
CUILDREIMHNE AND THE DESERTION OF TARA.
'T^HE Northern Ui Neill having succeeded in vanquishing
-*■ their Connact kinsmen at the battle of Ocha (487), soon
after entered upon a struggle with the Southern branch.
A brief account of the conflicts during this period is necessary
in order to explain the true cause of the desertion of Tara, and,
incidentally, the true cause of the battle of Guildreimhne.
In 504 A.D. (499 F.M.) Muirchertach Mac Erca and the Northern
Ui Neill defeated Duach Teangumha, King of Conuact, at the battle of
the Curlieu Hills. Duach had taken his brother Eocaid Tirmcharna
prisoner against the guarantee and protection of Muirchertach, and this
was the cause of this battle and two others against the Connact men.
A certain woman caused it — Duiseach, the daughter of Duach, and wife
of Muirchertach. She incited her husband to fight her father, because
he had made a prisoner of her foster-father Eocaid against her husband's
guarantee.
In 567 Baedan was slain in the battle of Leim-an-eich by Comain,
the son of Coleman Beg, the son of Diarmaid, and Comain his cousin.
At the instance of Coleman Beg they did the deed.
In 572 Aedh, son of Ainmire, fought the battle of Bealach-Feadha,
in which fell Coleman Beg.
In 579 he fought the battle of Druim Mic Earca against the Cinel-
Eogan, in which fell Colga, son of Domnall, the Ard Righ.
Aedh Slaine, son of Diarmaid, in 596 killed his nephew, Suibhne,
the son of Coleman Beg, though forewarned by Columba not to be
guilty of the "parracida." Aedh was slain by Suibhne, son of Conall,
in A.D. 600.
In 597 Coleman Rimedh, joint king with Aedh Slaine, defeated
Conall Cu, the son of Aedh, son of Ainmire, at Sleamhain in Meath.^
The battle of Sligo (543) was fought and won by the Northern Ui
Neill and their allies over the men of Connact, and Eogan Bel was
slain.
In 559 Fergus and Domnall, the sons of Muirchertach, and the
Cinel-Eogain slew his successor, Olioll Indbann, at the battle of Cuil
Conaire in Mayo.
In 561 was fought the celebrated battle of Cuildreimhne (Cool-
drevna), a few miles north of Sligo, in which the Northern Ui Neill
routed the Southern Ui Neill.
A perusal of this formidable list is suflScient to prove that
it is not necessary to look outside the perpetual hostility that
raged between the Northern and Southern Ui Neill for the
* Adamnan, p. 14, — Reeves.
S
25S fiARLY IRISH HISTORY.
causes of the battle of Cuildreimhne. However, it so happened
that about this time St. Columba set out for the evange-
lization of thePicts, and a popular legend has connected his name
with the battle, and assigned his share in bringing it about as
the cause of his leaving Erin. The Four Masters have thf
following entry at 555. The true date is 561 A.D. : —
The battle of Cuildreimhne was gained against Diarmaid, son of
Cearball (Southern Ui Neill), by Fergus and Domnall, the tAvo sons of
Muirchertach, son of Erca," by Ainmire, the son of Sedna, and by
Ninnidh, the son of Duach, and by Aedh, the son of Eocaid Tirni-
charna, King of Connact. It was in revenge for the killing of Curnan,
son of Aedh, son of Tirmcharna, while under the protection of Colum-
cille, that the Clanna-Neill of the North and the Connact men gave this
battle of Cuildreimhne to King Diarmaid ; and also on account of the
sentence which Diarmaid passed against Columcille about a book of
Finnen, when they left it to the award of Diarmaid, who pronounced
the celebrated decision — " To every cow belongs its calf," etc.
Columba was also in after times accused of having caused
two other battles, the battle of Culrathain, by his contention
with Comgall for a church near Ross Torathair, and the battle
of Cuil Feadha against Colman, the son of King Diarmaid, in
revenge for his having been outraged in the case of Baedan,
the son of Ninnidh, King of Erin, who was killed by Colman at
Leim-an-eich, in violation of the protection (coitneiiige) of
Columcille.^ A legend was put in circulation in after time
that it was as a penance for these misdeeds, either voluntary, or
imposed by St. Molaise, of Devenish, that St. Columba went
into exile to lona, and carried the Gospel to the Picts, " to win,"
said St. Molaise, "as many souls for Christ as had been lost in
these battles." As regards the two last mentioned battles, Bishop
Reeves has proved that they took place after his departure for
[ona — one as long as twenty-four years afterwards. He
suggests, it is true, a possible transposition of dates ; but this
appears to us too conjectural. We shall therefore confine our
attention to Cuildreimhne. The Annals of Ulster and Tiger-
nach, giving no details, state that the battle was won through
the prayer of Columba — per orationem Golwincille. The so-
called prayer (the Four Masters do not call it a prayer) is given
by them and by Tigernach. It represents Columba as being
seemingly an on-looker at the battle, and saying or praying :—
^ See genealogical table at p. 169.
'See Kseves' Adamna/i, 2-47, for full details.
CUILDREIMHXE AND THE DESERTION OF TARA. £59
'* O God, why keepest Thou not the mist off from us, if per-
chance we may reckon the number of the host, (the mist) that
deprives us of judgment. The host that marches round a cairn.
'Tis a son of the storm that betrays them (i.e., the Southern Ui
Neill.) He is my Druid who denies me not. The Son of God
it is who will work with me. Beautiful it makes the onset,
Baetan's* steed before the host, it seems good to Baetan of the
yellow hair ; it will bear its burden upon it."
There is not much devotional fervour in this so-called
prayer, and if it was the only help Columba gave, he got credit
for the victory very easily. This is the poetry of the battle.
The prose, which we now proceed to give from Tigernach, is
more reliable. " Fraech^n, the son of Teniusan, 'tis he that
made the ' Druid's fence ' for Diarmaid, Tuatan, the son of
Dimman, son of Saran, son of Cormac, son of Eogan, 'tis he that
overturned the 'Druid's fence.' Maglamde went across it,
and he alone was slain." So far Tigernach. The Four Masters
add : — " Three thousand was the number that fell of Diarmaid's
people. One man only fell on the other side, Maglaim was his
name, for it was he that passed beyond the Druid's fence (et^be
n-t)f uA-o)." ^ We suppose this means that he went across the
Druid's fence into the mist, and was slain. The honours of the
day clearly rested with the wizard, Tuatan, the son of Dimman.
Another cause assigned for Columba's rousing his kinsmen
to fight at Cuildreimhne was that his protection had been
violated by King Diarmaid. Curnan, son of Aedh, King of
Connact, attended the Feis of Tara in 560, and was guilty of
homicide within the precinct. He fled. Keating, following the
account in the " Aeded Diarmata," says he fled to the protection
of the sons of Muirchertach MacErca, i.e., Domhnall and Fergus,
and to the protection of Columba. Tigernach says nothing of
the protection of Fergus and Domhnall, but simply records
* Baetan was the third son of Muirchertach Mor mac Erca, and afterwards
became Ard Righ. And the above appears to us to be an extract from a praise
poem on him after he became, and whilst he was, Ard Righ. Columba is supposed
to be looking on, and says the son of the wind betrays them by blowing away
the mist, betraying the men who go round the cairn. The words in brackets are
ours. The words " the host " in the third line should, we suggest, be " the mist."
We offer this view, of course, with great diffidence. For praise poem see
Annals »f Vlsier, A.D. 562.
"Tigernach, Rev. Celt, xvii., 144. O'Donovan, and also Hennessy and Todd, misa
the correct translation of Cviacati a re -po l,A inx) ei-pbe n--ojioAX> xa.^^ a cent). It
means overturned. So Stokes and Windiach sub voce. O'Donovan has *' placed the
Erbe Dsuadh over his {i.e., Diarmaid's) head." Hennessy is equally at fault. He
translates, " Tuathau ij. was that threw overhead the Druid's Erbe." — Ann. Ulst.
2G0 EAllLY IRISH HISTORY.
the " death of Curnan, son of Aedh, son of Tirmcharna, by
Diarmait, son of Cerball, while under Colm-Cille's protection
A\[. ComAifce) ; and tliis is one of the causes of the battle of
Cuildreimhne.'"^ The Four Masters say Carnan was put to
death in violation of the guarantee and protection of Columba
(CA^t flAtiAit) 1 coitiAipge Coluim CiUe.) The words " violation
of protection " appear to be used in two senses. Firstly, they
mean the violation of an express guarantee, e.g., when Fergus
MacRoigh gave a guarantee to Naoise that Concobar would
keep his promise not to injure him, etc. And, secondly, they
appear to be used to mean the violation of a right of sanctuary
where there has been no agreement express or implied.
Tigernach appears to refer to this right of sanctuary, but the
Four Masters, seeing, perhaps, the difficulty of sustaining an
ambulatory right of sanctuary — a right not attached to a par-
ticular place, but to the person of the protector — add that
Columba had given a guarantee of safe conduct to Curnan.
Why ? We are not aware of any ecclesiastical authority to
sustain the existence of an ambulatory right of sanctuary. So
far as we know the right of asylum in pagan times and the
right of sanctuary in Christian times was always attached
to some church, shrine, enclosure, or place.
The innocence of Columba, it is further stated, was attested
by a miracle. This, as Adamnan tells us, occurred at a synod
which was held at Tailtin — in the year after the battle
according to the generally received view.
For, after the lapse of many seasons, when St. Columba was
excommunicated by a certain synod for some venial, and so far ex-
cusable matters, not rightly, as afterwards became clear, at the last he
came to the same assembly that had been gathered against himself.
And when St. Brendan, of Birr, saw him approaching he quickly rose
and, with face bowed down, reverently kissed him. Ihe seniors
remonstrated, and asked why he did not decline to rise before, and
kiss an excommunicated person. " I have seen," said Brendan, " a very
luminous column of fiery hair going before the man of God whom ye
despise, and also holy angels the companions of his walk through the
field. Therefore I dare not slight this man, whom I see to be fore-
ordained by God to be the leader of the people unto life." When he
had thus spoken, not only did they desist, but they even honoured him
with great veneration. This thing was done at Tailte (Tailtin).''
« Keating, Text and Translation, Reeves' Adamnan, 248. Mev. Celt, 17, 141.
' Adamnan, III. c. 3., abridged.
OUILDREIMHNE AND THE DESERTION OF TARA. 261
There was thus, in fact, no sentence of excommunication
fulminated at all. Assuming that at first the synod held
Columba guilty of bellicose irregularities, which Adamnan and
every cleric of his time would consider venial enough, at the
same sitting, on further reconsideration, they returned a verdict
of acquittal, which we see no reason for disturbing. The
action of the synod, based, as no doubt it was, on the personal
protestation of St. Columba, ought to have set the matter at
rest for ever, especially as the Northern Ui Neill did not,
either before or afterwards, require any ecclesiastical stimulus
to set them moving on the war-path against their southern
kinsmen. This view is supported by Columba's action at the
celebrated Convention of Drumceat, as to which there is no
dispute. It took place in 575. The precise spot where the
assembly was held is the long mound in Roe Park, near
Limavady, called the Mullagh and sometimes Daisy Hill. It
was held there, partly for the convenience of King Aedh, but
more especially because it was the patrimonial territory of his
family.8 Sedna, the grandfather of Aedh, and Feidilim, were
brothers, being sons of Conall Gulban, so Columba came there
as a peace-maker, not to provoke but to prevent fratricidal
war between tlie Gael of Erin and thoir brethren and kinsmen
in Alba. As early as the third century, according to our texts,
there was a settlement of the Gael in Alba under Cairbre
Riada, son of Conaire, son of Mogh Lamha of Munster. x\
great famine came upon Munster, and Cairbre led a party of
his tribe to the north of Antrim and another to Alba, where,
Bede tells us, by agreement or force of arms they obtained a
settlement amongst the Picts, and were called, from their
leader, Dalriadini, i.e., Dalriada. Three centuries afterwards
this colony was reinforced or absorbed by a fresh immigration
of the Gael under the sons of Ere — Fergus, iEngus, and Loarn —
who took possession of a large territory there. Fergus Mac Ere
became their chieftain. From this Fergus, antiquaries assure
us, descended the royal line of Scotland and the English
monarchs from the time of James the First. In 574 Aidan,
the son of Gabhran, succeeded to the lordship (cofeAi) of the
Gael of Alba, or, as it came to be styled, Little Scotia, and, as
we have stated, was " ordained " by Columba when he took
" Roevea' Adamnan, 37.
262 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
the title of king. At this ceremony Columba admonished him
by " prophecy " never unrighteously to go against the kindred
in Erin.9
Aidan, instead of remaining the chieftain of a dependent
colony, now claimed to be an independent sovereign, while
the High King of Erin appears to have demanded tribute, and
possibly hostages, from him. This was the principal cause
which induced Columba to go to the Convention at Drumceat
That Congress had three aims in view,
His crown from Scanlan Mor to wrest,
On Riada's tribes a rent to place
From Erin's land her bards to drive.
The bards were in danger, it is said, of expulsion from Erin
on three occasions. Their " pot of covetousness " (coi|;e f xAnci)
had made them odious to the people. Their demands were exor-
bitant, and their numbers excessive. On two previous occasions
they had escaped through the favour and support of the Northern
Ui Neill, and, on this occasion, they found an advocate in
Columba the Peacemaker, and were " reformed." Their num-
bers were reduced, and certain lands were assigned to them in
various quarters, in return for which they were required to
open schools, and teach gratuitously. The particulars of this
reform are given in detail by Keating, and in the introduction to
the Amhra of Columcille. The bardic schools then established
flourished, with scarcely a break, down to the 17th century.
The Scanlan referred to was lord of Ossory, and was held in
bonds by Aedh for refusing to pay the customary tribute (there
are, as usual, variants of the story). He was released through
the interference of Columba. The territory of Ossory was co-
extensive with the present diocese ; it stretched from Sliere-
bloom to the meeting of the three waters, near Waterford.
According to the Book of Rights, the chieftain of Ossory was
entitled to receive from the Ard-Righ a gift (cuxAfiAfCAil) of
thirty steeds, thirty coats of mail, and forty swords. This free
gift, we assume, was in the nature of a " retainer," and repre-
8 " The service rendpred by Columba on this occasion was productive of
reciprocal advantage, for while it couferrod the sanction of religion on the question-
able title of Aidan it secured to the Abbot of Hy a prescriptive supremacy in the
politico-religious administration of Dalriada." — Keevea' Adamnan, 198.
CUILDREIMHXE AND THE DESERTION OF TARA. 263
sented the primitive gift of cows, which formed the bond between
over and under lordships. The Book of Rights states that
when the King of Cashel was not Ard-Righ no tribute was due
to him from Ossory. When the King of Cashel was Ard-Righ
it states, he was entitled (1) to rents {cA\\a) or tributes from
specified territories in Tipperary, Kerry, Clare, and Waterford.
Ossory is not included. The amount of this tribute is given in
great detail for the specified territories, ranging from a thousand
cows, oxen, rams, and mantles from Burren, to two thousand
hogs and a thousand cows from the Deisi of Waterford. He w^as
also entitled (2) to visitation and refection [^a. t\AA\\\c -\ a tieAtA
\:o\<\\a] from the King of Cruachan (ConriAtc) for two quarters
of a year, and to accompany him to Tir-Conaill, in return for a
free gift of one hundred drinking horns, one hundred swords,
one hundred steeds, and one hundred tunics. And so with the
Kings of Tir Conall, Tir Eogain, the Lord of Tullahogue, and
the Kings of Oirghialla, Ulidia, Tara and Ath Cliath. We
do not attach very great importance to the Booh of Rights. It
was evidently composed or thoroughly recast about the time
of Cormac mac Cuilenainn, and is intended to magnify and exalt
Cashel in a secular and religious point of view. Whatever
value the book may have as regards the provincial kings, as
regards the Ard-Righ it seems to indicate that, at any rate in
times of peace, he had no rights except the right of Visitation
and Refection. But the frequent raids made by the Ard-Righ
not only to lift the bojiomA but to enforce tribute from every
part of Erin, plainly show that, whatever his rights may have
been, his claims were much more extensive.
The most important question at the Convention, however,
was the bopoifi^ on Alba. After Columba came to the Congress,
and the matter was debated, he was requested to decide
between the men of Erin and the men of Alba. " It is not I
who will decide," said he, " but yonder youth," pointing to
Coloman. Coleman then gave judgment, and the decision he
gave was, " Their expeditions and hostings to be with the men
of Erin always, for hostings always belong to the parent stock.
Their tributes and games and shipping to be with the men of
Alba."
Colgan tells us that, in memory of the friendly settlement
betvreen the two kindreds, and the blessing of peace which it
sec red, an annual celebration and public procession of thanks-
264 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
giving was held every year at Drumceat down to his time
(1646).io
A good story, with a spice of legal trickery or sharp practice
in it, was evidently greatly relished in the Scriptorium and the
cloisters. As such stories are frequently quoted as evidence of
historical events, our readers may appraise their value from the
following samples, which we give in the order of time : "When
Lugaid MacCon was King of Tara, his wife had a plot oi glaiskin
as part of her separate estate. This glaishin was a blue dying
stuff or woad. It was a valuable crop, requiring great care
and watching during growth. A neighbour's sheep trespassed
and ate up the queen's glaishin. The queen sued the tres-
passer before the king, who awarded the sheep for the damage.
"No," protested the youthful Cormac MacArt, who was the
rightful king, and present in disguise, " the fleece is enough ;
the wool for the woad, for both will grow again." " A true
judgment," exclaimed the bystanders. " He is surely the son
of a king." Cormac regained his throne by his bad law-point.
The second story is the cow-book and the calf-book judgment,
which is equally meritorious : — St. Finnen, of Moville, objected
[why ?] to a copy being made of his Psalter or Gospel. Columba
borrowed the book and copied it furtively, in his church, with
the aid of miraculous light, in the night-time. Finnen claimed
the copy. It was left to the award of King Diarmaid. He
gave judgment against Columba, saying : — " Le gach boin a
boinin, acus le gach leabhar a leabhran — To every cow her calf,
to every (cow) book the (calf) book (belongeth)." ^^ And this was
one of the causes of the battle of Cuildreimhne ! ! The third
story relates to the ruse by which St. Moling is stated, in a
historical romance called the " Boromha Laigen," to have
obtained the remission of this odious tax from Finnachta
Fleadach. The word " Luan " in Gaelic means Monday, and
also the Day of Judgment. The sequel may be easily guessed.
The Saint induced Finnachta to remit the tax till Luan, which
he then successfully maintained meant the day of Judgment,
though the monarch intended the words to mean till Monday.
" It would be better," said an unconscious humourist, in the
Dublin University Magazine, " for the people of Leinster to
have continued to pay the Boromha tribute to this day than
1" The story of the penance was, of eourse, not forgotten. Columba was bounfl
never to see p]rin again. How was this to be got over ? He came, we are asked
to believe, to Erin with a bandage over his eyes ; went bandaged to the conven-
tion, and never removed it until he got back to lona ! ! ! — Reeves' Admnnan, 92.
^^ Legend says the fragment of the psalter preserved in an antique metal
casket, known as the Gaihach or Battler, is the actual copy, and that, notwith-
standing the judgment of the king, it remained witli Columba.— See Gilbert
facsimile MSS., viii., and plates iii. and iv.
CUILDREIMHNE AND TEE DESERTION OF TARA. 2G5
that this St. Moling should have set an example of clerical
special pleading and mental reservation in the equivocation by
which he is represented to have procured the release from that
irapost."^^
The battle of Cuildreimhne would have been fought if
Columba had never existed, and the desertion of Tara can
be accounted for without praying in aid the bells and curses of
St. Kuadhan. Tara occupied a central position in the province
of Meath. This district was in the exclusive occupation of the
Southern Ui Neill. When Diarmaid was assassinated, Fergus
and Domnhall, his successors, were residing at Aileach, near
Derry. Is it likely that they would come with their house-
holds, and reside at Tara, in the midst of their rivals and
enemies ? Certainly not. They would not have been safe
without or within the ramparts of Tara itself. On the other
hand, the occupation of Tara carried with it, in the minds of
the Gael, historic and superstitious associations. The chieftain
residing there would appear to be in visible ownership of the
supreme power. Consequently, when Fergus and Domnhall
decided to remain at Aileach, they determined not to allow
the Southern Ui Neill to occupy it, and it was plainly for that
reason that Tara was dismantled and abandoned, and the Lia
Fail sent out of Erin. If these weighty reasons did not exist
we may be certam that the Northern (Ji Neill would not be
terrified or influenced by the belligerent curses and bells of a
cleric belonging to the race of Olioll Olum.'^ A cleric of
the Northern branch would promptly and effectually, by
suitable prayer of reconciliation and purification, have
cleansed the precincts of the venerated Hill. The legend
of St. Rhuadan is not found in the Annals of Ulster, Tigernach,
or the Four Masters. It is embodied very fully as an " inset '*
taken from some ursgeul in our opinion, in MacGeoghan's
Translation of the Annals of Clonmacnoise,^^ from which we
quote. It is found substantially the same in the Book of
Lismore and in an Irish MS. in Trinity College, in a fifteenth
century vellum in the British Museum, which professes to
copy from the Bookof Sligo, &c., &c. The nature of this ursgeul,
^2 See O'Donovan's Note, F. M. and O' Mahony, 306. The Ard Righ could not
according to the Brehon Law Tracts, as we have shown, ante cxiv. , remit food
rents or, we assume, the cow rent, horoma, so as to bind his successors who made
frequent hostings to lift it.
^•* " The cause of the extinction of the regality of Tara was tlie fasting of
Patrick and his muinter against Laoghaire, the son of Niall, and the fasting of
Ruadhan of Lorrha, the son of Aengus, with the saints of Erin, against Diarmaid,
the son of Cearbhall, and against the four tribes of Tara ; and these saints
promised {i.e., predicted) that there should not be a (royal) house at Tara, of the
race of Laoghaire, or of the seed of Niall, (but) that there should be of the race of
Olioll Glum." O'Donovan adds in a note — " There is no authority for this promise
or prediction of the s;iints in any of the lives of St. Patrick, or even in that of
Rodanur., who was himself of the race of Olioll Glum." — te<ibAti riA 5CeAj<c, 53.
" Murphy, S.J., Annals of Clonmacnoise, p. 85 (condensed).
266 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
which is too long to be given here, may be gathered from the
opening sentences. ^^
King Dermott, to make manifest unto his subjects his magnificence,
appointed a sergeant named Buckleare, with a speare, to travel through
the kingdom with power to break such doors of the nobihties as he
should find narrow in such a manner as the speare could not enter into
the house thwartwayes or in the breadth of the doors. Buckleare
made his way, speare in hand, to the house of Aedh Guaire of Killfechan
in Connact. Guaire gave a stroke of his sword to the spearman and
took his head off him. This Guaire was half-brother to St. Ruadhan
of Lothra in Upper Ormond, Tipperary, to whom he fled for protection
after beheading the king's sergeant. The saint made a hole in the floor
of his hut and put Guaire into it. When Diarmaid arrived, Ruadhan
being enquired of the place where Guaire was would not lie but tell the
truth, as was his custom. The king saluted him with bitter and
pinching words, saying that it did not belong to one of his coat to
shelter and keep in his house a man who had killed the king's sergeant,
who was employed in the execution of his instructions, and prayed
that there might be no abbot or monk to succeed him in his place at
Lothra. " By God's grace," said Roadanus, " there shall be abbots
and monks for ever, and there shall be no king dwelling in Tara from
henceforward." The king asked where Guaire was. " I know not,"
said Roadanus, " unless if he be not where jou stand ; " for so he was
indeed right under the king's feet. The king afterwards had suspicions,
searched, found Guaire, and took him prisoner to Tai-a. Roadanus
followed him, and on his refusing to release Guaire Roadanus and a
bishop that was with him took their bells, which they rung hardly, and
cursed the king and place, and prayed God that no king or queen ever
after would or could dwell in Tara, and that it should be waste forever,
without court or palace, as it fell out accordingly. The conclusion is
curious and deserves attention: — "Roadanus being refused, tendered a
ransom of thirty horses, which the king was contented to accept, and
so granted him Aedh Guaire."
Thus the quarrel ended. The curses were, no doubt,
revoked, the bells silenced, and peace made on the basis of the
status quo ante helium}^
" Numerous entries in otir annals show that curses and bells had very little
influence in preventing outrages on ecclesiastical privileges and sanctuaries. For
instance, St. Carthach was expelled from Rahan, near Tullamore, in 636 by the
Southern Ui Neill, the only offence of the venerable abbot apparently being
that he did not belong to their own elan. And one Muinttr sometimes fought
against another ; while priests, even after they were released from compulsory
attendance in hostings, still occasionally joined in the fray.
1^ The issue of disputes of this kind was not always so satisfactory. Witness
the following (Four Masters, 1043) : — " The fasting of the clergy of Ciaran at
Tealach-Garbha (Tullangarvey) against Aedh Ua Comfeaela, lord of TefEa, and
Bearnain Ciaran (Ciaran's gapped bell) was rung with the end of the Bachall Isa
against him ; and in the place where Aedh turned his back on the clergy, in that
very place he was beheaded before the end of the month by Muirchertach V&
Maelsoachlaiiin."
C 267 }
CHAPTER XVIII.
THE NORTHMEN.
THE expulsion of St. Carthach ^ from Rahan took place in the
rei^n of Domhnall, son of Aedh, sou of Ainmire, by whom
was fought (637) a famous battle at a place called Magh
Rath in the county of Down, which, if not the place now
called Moira in the north-east of the county, was somewhere in
the vicinity of Newry. Suibhne Meann, Domhnall's prede-
cessor and kinsman, had been slain by Congal, and Domhnall,
shortly after his accession, attacked Congal, defeated him, and
compelled him to take refuge with his uncle in Alba.^ After
the lapse of seven years Congal returned with an army of
Britons, Saxons, Gail-Gael, and Pictsfrom Scotland and landed
in Down to fight for Little Ulster and, if fortune favoured him,
for Greater Ulster also, for he was descended from Conal
Cearnach, the renowned champion of the Red Branch Knights,
and claimed to be entitled to the whole territory ruled over by
Conchobar Mac Nessa. In the poem which begins with the
lines " How bravely Congal's host comes on," and which is
given in full in a historical romance on the battle and quoted
by Keating, we are told : —
A yellow lion upon green satin,
The standard of the Red Branch Knights,
As borne by the noble Conchobar,
Is now by Congal borne aloft.^
This was the ancient flag of Ulster and of Erin when the
Clanna Rury were predominant and ruled at Tara. It has
been superseded in modern times by the harp. The lion is
now claimed by England, but the animals depicted in the
English escutcheon are said by many to be leopards. The
* The original name is said to have been " Cuda," and " Mo " was prefixed
for respect, hence Mochuda. He was, it is said, called Carthach after his master.
' Reevts' Adamnan, 200.
• " Cath Muiglie Rath," S'29.
268 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
lion would appear, in any case, to belong by priority of use to
the men of Erin. The fortune of war, however, went against
Congal. After an obstinate struggle, which the bardic accounts
say lasted six days, Congal and his allies were routed with red
slaughter, and Congal himself fell in the " counter-blow of the
fight."
In the interval which elapsed between the battle of Magh
Rath (637) and 795, when the Norsemen first appeared, there
were the usual wars between chieftains and kings, which
occurred in every community where there was no strong central
authority. We shall not weary our readers with an enumera-
tion of them. Their monotonous futility has little interest
for the historian.
The Scandinavian invasion, if it can be properly so called,
may be conveniently divided into two periods— (1) from 795
to the coming of the Dubh- Gaill and of Olaf the White in 845,
and (2) from 845 to the battle of Clontarf in 1014. During
the first period, as in France and Britain, the invasion took
the form of raids for plunder by separate bands, and often
simultaneously at distant points. These raids seldom went
far inland, and did not interfere materially with the internal
warfare, which proceeded with much vigour, as usual, between
the native chieftains. In order to show more clearly the true
nature of the invasion of the Northmen we deem it necessar}'
to summarise in considerable detail the account of their raids
as we find them recorded in our Annals. Our readers may,
perhaps, find these particulars wearisome, but there is no royal
road to truth in the matter
In 795 Rathlin or Lambay was raided ; in 793 Inuis Patrick,
i.e., Holm Peel, Isle of Man ; in 807 Innishmurray, off Sligo,
and part of Roscommon ; in 803 and 806 lona, when twenty-six
monks were slain ; in 812 Connemara, when the Northmen
were defeated in Mayo ; in 813 Mayo, when they defeated
the men of Mayo ; in 819 Howth, and the islands at the
mouth of Wexford Harbour ; in 820 Cork and Cape Clear ; in
821 Bangor ; in 822 Downpatrick, the invaders defeated the
" Osraige," but were defeated by the Ulidians in the same year ;
in 823 the hermit, Etgal, was carried off from Skelig Michil^
and died from hunger and thirst ; in 824 Lusk and Meath ; in
825 Dun Lagen, near Glendalough ; in 826 Wexford ; in 828
Duuleer and Clonmore in Louth; in 831 Muirtheimne, in
THE NORTHMEN. 2G9
Louth, and Maelbrighte, the King, taken captive with his
brother, and carried off to the ships. A battle was gained over
the " Muintir " of Armagh, and a great number of them taken
captive. In 831 took place the first plundering of Armagh,
thrice in one month. The Ui-Meith Macha, Mucknce, Donagh-
moyne, and other churches in Monaghan and Louth, Maghera
in Derry, and Connor in Antrim, were raided. In 832, the
first year of Niall Caille, a great slaughter was made of the
foreigners at Derry ; Clondalkin was plundered by the foreigners
Lismore was burned, Dromeskin (Louth), Loughbrickland
(Down) were raided. Separate bands of raiders must have been
at work.*
In 833 the foreigners were defeated in Coshma (Limerick)
by the Ui Fidhgeinte. Glendaloch, Slane, and Fennor were
raided, and the greater part of Clonmacnoise was burned. In
844 Ferns and Clonmore were raided. Mungret, near Limerick,
and other churches, were burned. In 835, Kildare, Louth,
Bregia (N. Dublin) and Durrow were plundered. In 836 there
was most cruel devastation of Connact, and a battle-slaughter
of the Dsisi. In 837 there were sixty ships on the Boyne,
sixty on the LifFey, and these fleets plundered and spoiled the
plain of the LifFey and East Meath, " both churches and habi-
tations of men, and goodly tribes of flocks and herds." A battle
was gained at Inver-na-mbarc, near Bray, over the Southern
Ui Neill from the Shannon to the sea, " where such slaughter
was made as never was heard of." However, the kings and
chieftains escaped. The churches of L. Erne, Clones, Devenish,
Freshford, Kilkenny, Inis Caltra, Ballylongford (Kerry), and
Bealach Abhra (Cork) were destroyed. A slaughter was made
of the foreigners at Eas Ruadh, at Carn Feradaigh (Limerick)^
and at Fearta Fear Feig, on the Boyne. In this year
was the first taking of Ath Cliath by the foreigners. A
battle was gained over the Connacht men. 838 — A fleet
on L. Neaofh. The territories and churches of the North of
Ireland were plundered, and Cork and Ferns burned. 839 — The
burning of Armagh, with its oratories and cathedral. The
plundering of Louth by the foreigners of Lough Neagh ;
* SS^ — A great number of the "muintir" of Clonmacnoise were slain by
Foidlimid, King of Cashel, and all thsir termon burned to the doors of the church.
In like manner the " muintir" of Durrow also to the doors of the church. — F.M.
A battle gained over the "muintir" of Kildare in their church by Cellach, King
of Leinster, wLen many were slain — Ann. Ulst.
270 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
and they made prisoners of many bishops, and wise and
learned men, and carried them to their fortress, after having,
moreover, slain many others. 840 — A fortress was made by
the foreigners at Linn Duachaill, out of which the territories
and churches of Teffia were preyed. Another fortress was made
by them at Dublin, out of which they plundered Leinster and the
Ui Neill (South) as far as Slieve Bloom. 841 — The killino; and
burning of the Abbot of Linn Duachaill.'^ A fleet of Norsemen
on the Boyne at Rosnaree, another on Lough S willy, and a
third at Magheralin. Clonmacnoise, Castledermot, Birr and
Seirkieran were plundered. 842 — Clonfert was burned. 843 —
Cluana-an-dobhair, near Killeigh, in the King's County, and
Dunmask were plundered. Nuadhat and the Abbot of Tir-da.
Glas were martyred, and Forannan, the Primate of Armagh, was
captured, with his relics and Muintir, and taken to Limerick
to their ships. Here comes the first mention of Turgesius in
the Annals (843 F.M., recte 845). An expedition by Turgeis,
lord of the foreigners, upon Lough Ribh, so that they plun-
dered Connact and Meath, and burned Cluain-mic-Nois, with
its oratories, Cluain Fearta Erennain, and Tir-da-Glas, Lothra
and many others in like manner. A battle was gained over
the foreigners by King Niall, the son of ^Edh, in Magh Itha,
and a countless number fell. Turgeis was taken prisoner by
Maelseachlainn " and his drowning afterwards in L. Uair
(L. Owel), through the miracles of God, and Kiaran, and the
saints in general."® St. Kiaran's special anger is accounted
for by the fact that Ota, the wife of Turgesius, took her seat,
wo are told, on the high altar in the church at Clonmacnoise,
and gave audience and answer from it.
We think that the inference to be drawn from the entries we
have given (perhaps at too great length) is that up to 845 A.D.,
the period we are now dealing with, no Scandinavian kingdom
was established in Erin, and that the supposed sovereignty cf
Turgesius over the Gael for thirty years, as Giraldus states, or
for fifteen years, as Todd and O'Mahony suggest, or for seven
* Linn Duachail, at the tidal opening of the Rivers Glyde and Dee, in Louth,
S.E. of Castle Bellingham. — Todd, ^ars of the Gad and Gall, Ixii.
^ The Annals of Ulster and the Four Masters do not state that Turgeis
was drowned by Maelseachlainn, which was the form generally used by them
when the drowning was punitive or criminal. The words seem to point
rather to a drowning by the miracles of the saints. Macgeoghan states that
Turgeis was drowned by Maelseachlainn.
THE NORTHMEN-. 271
years as Berchan prophesied, is unsupported by trustworthy
evidence, and is part of the historical romance connected with
the tyrant Turgesius.
Todd was greatly influenced in the view he took of the
reign of Turgesius by the statement in the War of the Gael
with the Gaill. The author of that work states that Turgesius
came with a great royal fleet into the North of Ireland, and
assumed the sovereignty of the foreigners, and occupied the
whole of Leath Chuinn, and " usurped the Abbacy of Armagh,
and was in the sovereignty of the North of Ireland." Todd
fixes the date at 831 or 832, and infers that the duration of
the tyranny of Turgesius cannot have been more than about
thirteen years. He observes, " for nine years after his coming
he seems to have been content with his secular possession of
the country, or unable to overthrow the power of the ecclesi-
astical authorities. It was not until 841 that he succeeded in
banishing the bishop and clergy, and usurped the abbacy, that
is to say, the full authority and jurisdiction in Armagh and
the North of Ireland." Even if this account was reliable it
would fall very far short of proving that Turgesius was Ard
High over all Erin, or had reduced it to subjection. The only
evidence we can find supporting such a view before Giraldus
are the prophecies.
Berchan, the chief prophet of heaven and earth, said : —
Seven years shall they be — not weak their power
In the High Kingship of Erin,
In the abbacy of every church,
The Heathen of the Port of Dublin,
There shall be an abbot of them over this my Church ;
He shall not attend to Matins,
Without Pater, without Credo,
Without Gaelic ; only a foreign tongue.
And Beg Mac De : —
When the bell was rung at Warm Tailten,
Ciaran, the rich old man of Saighir,
Promised to Erin three times
Parties of Danes of the black ships (-outi lonsfi/.
These prophecies and the legends connected with them pro-
bably reached the ears of Giraldus, who is the first prose writer
who speaks of the conquest and subjugation of the whole country.
' Todd, Wars of the Gad, 10 and 225.
272 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
He tells us that in the time of Feidlimidh, the Norwegians
came to Erin with a great fleet, took possession with the
strong hand and destroyed the churches, and that Turgesius,
their leader, having subdued the country in a short time, and
making a circuit through it, " incastellated " it in suitable
places in every direction. " So you may see," he continues,
" in every direction, earth works with deep ditches, very lofty
and circular, and often triple. There are also walled castles
still perfect, but ancient and deserted, remaining from these
ancient times, to be seen to the present day. The Irish do not
care about castles. The wood is their castle and the marsh
their ditch. Turgesius then ruled Ireland peaceably for a time
(thirty years) until he fell by their stratagem of the maidens,"^
The maidens' stratagem is evidently, as Todd points out, an
imitation of Hengist's treacherous banquet to Vortigern, as
described by Nennius [c. 47). It runs thus : —
Turgesius was a successful suitor for the hand of Maelseachlainn's
daughter, and went to take home his bride, accompanied by fifteen
youths. She went to meet her lord, accompanied also by fifteen youths
disguised as maidens and armed with daggers, who fell upon and slew
Turgesius and his companions.^
Giraldus was manifestly referring to the Danish forts, as
the peasantry call them, and Staigue Fort and the great
mounds and work at Brugh na Boinne. It is on the popular
legends about these and the story in Nennius that he built his
narrative.
Keating follows Giraldus, and tells us :—
Turgesius, the Norse tyrant, with his armies of the men of Fiun-
Lochlainn,held supreme power in Erin for thirteen years after he had been
previously the scourge of that country for seventeen years, for during
that length of time he had been exercising violence and rapine on the
inhabitants. But when the nobles of Erin saw that Turgesius had
brought confusion on their country, and that he was assuming supreme
authority, and reducing them to thraldom and vassalage, they became
inspired with a loftiness of mind and fortitude of spirit and a hardness
and firmness of purpose that urged them to work on right earnestly and to
toil zealously against him and his plundering hordes. But though numerous
were the battles the Gael fought against Turgesius he at length suc-
ceeded in vanquishing the Gaelic nation, and reduced it to bondage and
serfdom to himself and to his almuraigh (foreigners).^"
8 Giraldus, Roll Series, v. 182.
9 Tudd, Wars of the Gad, xliv.
i« Keating, O'Mahony, 505.
THE NORTHMEN. 273
At the commencement of the second period (845-1014) the
entries in our Annals relating to the coming of the Black
foreigners (Dubh-Gaill) may be summarised as follows : —
In 847 a fleet of seven score ships of the king of the
foreigners came to contend with the foreigners in Erin
before them. The new foreigners were henceforth commonly
called the Dubh-Gaill, or black foreigners, and the old foreigners
were called Finn-Gaill, or fair foreigners. In 849 the Dubh-Gaill
arrived at Athcliath, and made a great slaughter of the Finn-Gaill, who
had settled there. They made another attack on the Finn-Gaill at Linn
Diiachaill, and made a great slaughter of them there. In 851 a fleet of
eight score ships of Finn-Gaill arrived at Snam-Eidhneach (i.e., Carling-
ford Lough) to give battle to the Dubh-Gaill, and they fought with
each other for three days and three nights, and the Dubh-Gaill were
victorious. The Finn-Gaill left their ships to them. In 852 came Olaf, son
of the King of Lochlanu, and all the foreign tribes in Erin submitted to
him, and a rent (ciof) was given to him by the Gael.^i
Now, who were the New Foreigners ? Where was Lochlann ?
Dubhgaill, black foreigners, cannot mean people of the dark or
brunette type. Whether they came from Scandinavia or Den-
mark, the overwhelming mass of the raiders must have been
blonde or fair. " At the northern limit (which includes Scan-
dinavia and Denmark)," writes Ripley, " we find that about one-
third of the people are pure blondes, characterised by light hair
and blue eyes, about one-tenth are pure brunettes, the re-
mainder, over one half, being mixed, with a tendency to blond-
ness. There is no appreciable difference between Scandinavia
and Denmark as regards pigmentation, and dark types do not
chang-e to blonde.
o^
We can scarcely distinguish a Swede from a Dane to-day, or either
from a native of Schleswig Holstein or Friesland. They are all
" In the Landnamaboc, or Book of Settlements in Iceland, we iKndf the tUIow-
inCT statement about Olaf, the White, who was, undoubtedly, the Oalf who came
to Erin in 853, ten [years before the death of Maelseachlainn : — " Anlalf, the White
(Oleif ?) was the name of a host-king He was the son of King Ingiidd ,the son of
Helgi, the son of Helge, the son of Aniaf (Oleif's Sonar), the son of Godfred, the
son of Halfdan, Whiteleg, the King of the Upland (E. Norway) folk. Anlaff, the
White, harried in the West in wrecking cruises, and won Dyflin (Dublin) and
Dublin shire — (Dyflin shire) — and made himself kint) over it. Ho took to wife Aud,
or Ead, the Deep Wealthy, the daughter of Cetilflatneh, the son of Beorn Buna,
lord of Norway. Thor-slan, the Red, was the name of their son. Anlafif fell in
Ireland (fell a Irlande) in battle, but Aud and Thor-slan went to thc^ Houthreys
(Hebrides). — Ve^jfusson, Ori^ines Islaiidicce, Landnambok, 11-14, Vol. I., 7t3,
• 1805.)
T
274 EARLY IRISH HISTORr.
described to us by chroniclers, and our modern research corroborates
the testimony^ as tawny-haired, fiercely blue-eyed barbarians." ^*
It seems probable, we think, that they were different tribes,
nominally at least subject to the King of Lochlann. We can
thus more easily understand their ready submission to Olaf
Beg MacDe says, as we have seen, that they had black ships.^^
" One of the captains was a red-haired maiden." Saxo-gram-
maticus tells us they used black tents for concealment.^* And
they probably wore black armour of some kind. Glun-iarrainn,
iron-knee, and Glun-dubh, black-knee, seem to refer to some
black iron defensive armour, and so, probably, were called the
" Black Foreigners.''
This shire land, over which Olaf made himself king, was,
no doubt, in part at least, what in after time came to be
known as Fingal. It extended as far north as the Delvin
rivulet, a little south of the Nannie water, and inland, in theory
at least, as far as the salmon swam up, in accordance with
Norse law — i.e., to the Salmon Leap, Lixlot, now Leixlip. The
rent of this portion Olaf no doubt received, and this is probably
what is meant by our annalists. He most assuredly did not get
rent from the High King, or the provincial Kings of Erin.
There never was a conquest and occupationof a large part of Erin
like the Danish occupation of England. Besides Dublin and
Dublin-shire, they built and held forts, with some territory
adjoining, at Limerick, Cork, and Waterford, and occupied some
places along the coast. Elsewhere there was no permanent
occupation.
The Gaelic name of the place where now is Dublin was Ath
Cliath — the Ford with the Hurdle Bridge. The Scandinavians
called it " Dyflin," a corruption of the Gaelic name for that
inlet at the confluence of the Poddle and the Liffey which
formed a harbour where ships were moored, and which the Gael
called " Dubhlinn," or black pool, from the dark colour given
to the water by the bog which extends under the river.^^
1- Ripley, W., Races of Europe I., 68 and 314.
Looh in Gaelic frequently means fiords, or arms of the sea, e.g., Foyle,
Swilly, Belfast, Carmen, (Wexford), Lurgan (Galway). Whatever may be the
true meaning of Vikinr/, it is highly probable the Gael understood it to mean the
men of the Fiords — Lochlannach.
" War of the Gael, p. 225 and 41.
^*For the tents were dusky in colour and mufflad in a sort of pitchy covering
that they might not catch the eye of auyoae who came near* Saxorammaticus,
V, 167. The captain was the famous Ingen Uua-o.
^^ Haliday. — The Scandinavian Kini/dom of Dublin, 23,
THE NORTHMEN. 275
The termination of the names of three of the provinces is Norse,
the Norse, "ster" ( = stadr, place) being added to theGaelic name*
as Murahan-ster, Munster; Ulad-ster, Ulster; Leighin-ster,
Leinster ; Connact-ster (Kunnakster, Connact) was not retained
liy the Anglo-Normans, or Angevins. But these names were
never used by the Gael when speaking their own tongue, and
it must not be supposed that they indicate conquest or occupa-
tion of these provinces by the Northmen.
Feordr is a frith or bay, while a. small crescent-formed
inlet is called a vik. There were five Norse fiord names
in Erin — Wexford, (L. Carmen) Waterford, (L. Dacaich, or Port
Lairge), Carlingford (Snamh Eidhneach),Strangford (L. Cuan),
and Ulrick's fiord (L. Larne). " There are," writes Joyce, " little
more than a dozen places in Ireland at the present day bearing
Danish names, and these are nearly all on or near the East coast
Worsae (p. 71) gives a table of 1,373 Danish and Norwegian
names in the middle and northern counties of England." He
adds, " This appears to me to afford a complete answer to the
statement that we sometimes see made — that the Danes
conquered the country, and that their chiefs ruled over it as
sovereigns."
After the coming of Olaf, from 853 to 875, there were the
usual periodical raids and plunderings such as we have
described. After this came what are known as the forty years'
rest, during which time there came no fresh reinforcements
from the north. The Norsemen in Erin during this time raided
and made hostings like the native chieftains, won and lost
battles, but made no additions to their territory. They appear
to have been gradually taking their place among the tribes of
the Gael, and there were alliances and intermarriages from time
to time between them. During all this time the High King
exercised his sovereign rights as usual — enforced the payments
of rent or tribute and exacted the delivery of hostages, as the
following summary will clearly show : —
In 802 Aodh Oirnidhe, Ard-Righ, went with a large army
into Meath and divided it into two parts between the sons of
Domhnall, viz., Conchobar and Ailill. They were the sons of
the last Ard-Righ. Ailill was slain in battle by Conchobar the
following year.
In 805 he divided Leinster between the two Muiredachs.
839 — The plundering of Feara Ceal and Dealbhna-Eathra (a
276 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
large part of the King's County) by Kiall Caille, the High
King. Feidlimidh, King of Munster, plundered Meath and
Breagh, and he rested at Tara after having in one day taken
the hostages of Connact.
840 — An army was led by Feidlimidh to Carman (Wex-
ford) and by Niall Caille to Maghochtar (N. Kildare) to meet
him. A battle ensued, and Niall " bore away the crozier of
the devout Feidlimidh by the battle of swords." Feidlimidh
was abbot or bishop of Cashel according to O'Donovan. The
same year a battle was gained by Maelruanaedh, the father of
King Maelseachlainn, over Diarmaid, son of Conchobar, and
Diarmaid was slain.
844 — The plundering of Donnchadh, son of Follamhan, and
of Flann, son of Maelruanaedh, by Maelseachlainn, son of
Maelruanaidh. The plundering of the Termon of Ciaran {i.e.,
Clonmacnoise) by Feidlimidh, King of Munster ; but Ciaran
pursued him, as he thought, and gave him a thrust of his
crozier, and he received an internal wound, so that he was not
well until his death. He died in 845. The annalists {F. M.
and Ulst.) add, to our amazement, that he was the best scribe
and anchorite of his time. Does the word "anchorite," taken
in connection with his crozier, imply that the devout Feid-
limidh was a bishop in Orders, as distinguished from a
secular bishop (if we may use the phrase), claiming to be bishop
or abbot in right of his crown of Munster without ecclesiastical
status ? 18
852 — Maelseachlainn proceeded to Munster as far as Ineoin
na n-deisi (near Clonmel), and enforced hostages and submis-
sion from them, for they had given him opposition at the
instigation of the foreigners.
854 — He went again to Cashel and carried off the hostages
of Munster.
857 — He went into Munster and stayed ten nights at Neim
(the Black water) and plundered it southwards to the sea after
defeating their kings at Carn Lugh-dach. He carried off
their hostages from Gowra Road to the Bull of Dursey Island
and from the Old Head of Kinsale to East Arra of the Arran
Isles.
'8 F. M. 840 A.D.— " The reader must bear in mind that FoidlimiJh was
alibot or bishop of Cashel in right of his crown of Mauster." We doubt this.
Maegeoghan writes of " hia great irregularity and great desire of spoyle."
THE NORTHME^. 277
858 — He led a hosting of Munster, Leinster, and Connact
and the Southern Ui Neill, into the North. Aedh Finnliath
attacked his camp at night, and destroyed many in the middle
of the camp, but was finally defeated, with great loss, for
Maelseachlainn and his army manfully defended the camp
against the people of the North, Aedh then formed a league
with the foreigners. This was not, however, the first occasion
on which the Gael made alliance with them. As far back
as 849 Cinaedh, King of Cianachta Breagh, turned against
Maelseachlainn at the instigation of the foreigners, so that he
wasted the Ui Neill, both churches and districts, from the
Shannon to the sea. The following year he was drowned in
the Nanny, which flows through Ceannacta Breagh, by Mael-
seachlainn and Tighernach, with the approval of the good
men of Erin, and of the coarb of St. Patrick especially, Aedh
Finnliath then rose out against Maelseachlainn at the instiga-
tion of Cinaedh's brother and successor in the chieftainry.
859 — There was a great hosting by Olaf and Ivar and
Cerbhall, King of Ossory, who was then in alliance with them
into Meath. Maelseachlainn then held a royal meeting at
Rahugh, in Westmeath, and the coarbs of Patrick and Finnian
used their influence to establish peace and concord between
the men of Erin. Cearbhall joined Leth Chuinn, and Mael-
gualach tendered his allegiance and was stoned to death by
the foreigners.
860 — Aedh Finnliath and Flann, son of Conang and Olaf
and the foreigners, raided Meath, and Cearbhall, King of
Ossory, came to the aid of the High King.
In the fo]lowin<T year, 861, when, he had become High King, the
foreigners, rifled New Grange, Knowth, Dowth, and the Great Mound
at Drogheda. Lorcan, King of Meath, was with them thereat, and waa
blinded by Aedh the following year.^^
The reign of this Cearbhall, as King of the Norsemen of
&.thcliath, is not mentioned in our annals, but Todd and
Haliday are of opinion that the reconciliation we mentioned
was only temporary, and that there is good evidence that
either in alliance with, or elected by, the Norse of Dublin, he
became King there about 872, and reigned until 888. His
death in that year seems to have inspired the Gael with the
" Tltrtt Frag, 161.
275 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
hope of obtaining possession of Ath Cliath by the expulsion of
the Northmen. Flann, the High King, joining his forces to
those of the King of Connact and aided by the ecclesiastical
authorities, attacked them, but was routed in a battle in which
fell the King of Connact, the bishop of Kildare, the abbot of
Killdalkey, and many others. ^^
^' Many of the learned in Erin composed praise poems on Cearbhall, the King
of Ossory, in which they commemorated every victory he had won, and Aeugus,
the high, wise abbot, the Coarb of Clonfert Molua (Kyle), at the foot of Slieve
Bloom, most of all. O'Donovan observes that it is highly probable that the
accounts which were so laudatory of the King of Ossory were based on these
poems, which were preserved in the monastery there.
In the Landnama-boc we find the following reference to Cearbhall (Carroll) :
" Afterwards Eg-wind (Eg-wind-e) took to wife in Ireland Raforta ( ), the
daughter of Cear-ral. She gave birth to a boy in the Southreys (Hebrides, Sodor),
and put him to fosterage there. Two winters later they went back to the island
(Sodor) to see the boy, and saw a boy there with fair eyes, but there was no flesh
on him, for he was starved, and so they called the boy Helge, the Lean. He was
afterwards put into fosterage in Ireland. Eg-wind was called the Ostman, or
Eastman, because he came west over the sea out of Sweden in th6 east. Helge
was brought up in Ireland." And also, " at the time Iceland was settled from
Norway, Adrianus was Pope of Rome . . . Cearrall (Cearbhall) King at
Dublin." " Before Iceland was settled by the Northmen, there were there those
people whom the Northmen called Papas. They were Christian men, and people
think that they must have been from the West of the Sea because there were
found after them Irish books and bells and croziers (baglar), and yet more things
by which it might be perceived that they were West men." — Are's (f 1148),
Landnama boc, Vegfusson, ubi. tup., 13, H and 145.
1
t 279 ]
CHAPTER XIX
A WINTER CIRCUIT.
BEFORE we reach the period of the forty years' rest (875-
915), we find entries iu our annals relating to the Gaill-
Gael, who are sometimes referred to as the apostate Irish who
had renounced their baptism. The word usually means the
Gael over sea, — the " sea-divided Gael," the inhabitants of
Argyle ( Airer-gaedela) of Galloway (Gall-gaedhela), the Hebrides,
Cantire, and other places. The Gaill-Gael, however, we now
speak of were different ; they were resident in Erin. They are
referred to in the Annals of Ulster and of the Four Masters,
but it is nowhere stated that they had lapsed into paganism.
Aedh Finnliath gained a great victory over Gaill-Gael at Glenn
Foichle (Glenelly, near Strabane), in 855. Bishop Reeves was
of opinion — and we think rightly — that these were foreign
mercenaries.^ It is clear, however, from the Three Fracjments
of Annals that the Gaill-Gael were located in Munster and
other parts of Erin. The first of these Fragments, which
relates chiefly to the Ui Neill, was composed in the North ; the
other two " evidently belong to Ossory or Leix, and were
compiled in some monastery there; but nothing is known of
the age or nature of the MSS. from which Dubhthach Mac
Firbisigh copied these Fragments.'' The author of the Third
Fragment states that Maelseachlainn [858] made a great host-
ing against the Munster men, and against Cearbhall, King ol
Ossory, his brother-in-law, and defeated them in a pitched
battle at Carn Lughdhach, near Gowran, in Kilkenny.^ He
continues : — " Though Maelseachlainn had not come on this
expedition to take the kingdom of Munster for himself, he
ought to have come to kill all the Gaill-Gael who were killed
1 FourMasters, 1154. The Cinel Eogain and Muirchertach Ua Neill sent per
sons over sea to hire, and they did hire the ships of Gaill-Gael of Ara- (Arran,
Ceantire, the Isle of Man. and the borders of Alba in general.
^ O'Donovan, Three Fragments, 2 and 139. This hosting, and the battle of Cam
Lughdhach, are mentioned iu the Annals of Ulster and the Four Masters.
280 EARLt IRISH HISTORY.
there, for they were a people who had renounced their baptism,
and they were usually called Northmen, for they had the
customs of the Northmen, and had been fostered by them ; and
though the original Northmen were bad to the churches, they
were by far worse in whatever part of Erin they used to be."
In the same year (858) a victory was gained by Cearbhall over
theGaill-Gael of Aradh Tire (Barony of Arra, Tipperary."^) He
gives an instance of their sacrilegious spoliations under the date
of 854 : — "In this year many forsook their Christian baptism, and
joined the Lochlanns, and they plundered Armagh, and carried
away all its valuables ; but some of them did penance, and came
to make restitution (venerunt ad satisfactionem)."* Forsook
their baptism may mean here merely that they were recreant
and untrue to it, especially in not going afterwards and making
restitution.
There were, no doubt, many Gael taken captives, and, when
young, brought up as pagans, and there may have been indi-
vidual cases of persons renouncing the Faith, and there were,
also, no doubt, mercenaries who had been brought up as
pagans ; but in the absence of all mention of a •class of apostate
native-born Gael in Erin by our Annalists it is safe to assume
that no such class ever came into existence.
The forty years' rest corresponds very nearly with the reign
of Flann Sinna, the son of Maelseachlainn (877-915). For this
period we shall give only a few illustrative details. In 883 the
Northmen raided Kildare, and carried off fourteen score cap-
tives to their ships. In 890, led by Gluniarn, they raided
Armagh, and carried off 710 persons into captivity. In 895
(F.M.) they were on L. Neagh, and carried off the " Etach
Padraig," i.e., Patrick's raiment (or crozier ? ) ^
In 895 they were defeated by the men of Louth and Ulidia,
with the loss of 800 men. In this battle fell Olaf, the son of
Ivar, and Gluntradna, the son of Gluniarn. In 901 the North
men were expelled from Ath Cliath, by Cearbhall, the son of
Murigen, and the Leinster men and the men of Bregia, and
* A victory was gained by Cearbhall, Lord of Ossory, and by Iv^ar in the terri-
tory of Aradh Tire over the Cinel-Fiachach (barony of Moycashel, Westmeath),
and the Gaill-Gael of Leath Chuinn. — Four Masters, 856 A.D.
* Three Fragments, 127.
* O'Donovan says it was, probably, a garment preserved in some old chapel
near L. Neagh. We suggest that it was a crozier like the " Etach Mochaoi,"
which was a pastoral statf, and called eiccAch (winged) from a legend that it flew
from heaven. Bieeve's Adamiian, ioO.
A WINTES CIRCUIT. 281
leaving great numbers of their ships behind them they fled half
dead to Ireland's Eye, where they were besieged. During
these years Flann, too, was busy. In the first year of his reign
(877) he plundered Munster from Killaloe to Cork, and in 880
made another raid, and carried off' their hostages. In 906,
joined by Cearbhall, he plundered from Gowran to Limerick.
The celebrated Cormac MacCuilenain was Kinof of Munster
at this time, and his principal adviser was a fiery abbot,
Flaithbhertach, of Inis Scattery.^ They led a strong force in
the following year (907) into Meath, and defeated the army of
Leath Chuinn, on the historic battle-field of Magh Lena, near
Tullamore, and they subsequently defeated the Southern
UTi Niall and the men of Connact, and carried ofi the hostages
of Connact in their great fleets on the Shannon.
Cormac was bishop of Cashel as well as King of Munster.
Some say that he had married the daughter of Flann Sinna —
Gormlaith, the blue-eyed princess, and had repudiated her.
Others say, with more probability, that there was only a
betrothal between them, and that the ensrafjement was broken
off. In either case Gormlaith was not likely to be a peace-
maker. At this time she was the wife of Cearbhall, the son of
Murigen, the King of Leinster who must not be confounded
with Cearbhall, the King of Ossory, and subsequently became
the wife of Niall Glandubh. An ecclesiastical element was
also added to the seething cauldron.^ There was at this time
a famous monastery at Monasterevan which had been founded
by Evin, of the line of Eogan Mor, and the monks in the
abbey were all Munster men, and it was called M uimneach
i.e., of the Munster men. Cearbhall, King of Leinster, took
forcible possession of it and expelled the monks, who promptly
laid their grievances before Cormac and the fiery abbot, who
was himself of the line of Eogan Mor. It is also stated that
• Flaithbhertach afterwards became king of Cashel, i.e., Munster. He resigned
the kingship, and went oa his pilgrimage in 920 (F.M.), and was succeeded by
Lorcan, the grandfather of Brian Boru.
' Even if there was a contract per verba de presenti, as sometimes happened
in those days between persons of tender years, it would be nullified by Cormac
becoming a professed religious, if the marriage was not consummated, and we
think it likely that Cormac was a "religious," like his successor, Flaithbertach,
the abbot of Inis Scattery.
Se quis dixerit matrimoniura ratum non consummatum par solemnem
religionia professionem alteriua conjugum non dirimi anathem-i ciit.
0onc. Trident, sess. xxiv., can. 6.
• CJ, O'Halloran, History of Ireland, 185.
282 Early Irish history.
Cormac demanded the boroma from Leinster. Howcvor this
may be, the result of these complications, which we shall not
attempt to unravel, was that a pitched battle was fought (908) at
BealachMughna(Ballaghmoon),iaKildare,abouttwoandahalf
miles north of Carlow.
Woeful indeed was the tumult and clamour of that battle, for thf^re
rose the death-cry of the Muaster men as they fell, aud the shouting
of the Leinster men, exulting in the slaughter of their foes. There
were two causes why the fight went so suddenly against the men of
Munster. The first was because Keilcher, a relative of Finguime
(Cor mac's predecessor) jumped hastily upon his steed and cried out,
" Flee, O Free Clans of Munster ; flee from this terrific conflict, and
let the clerics fi^ht it out themselves, since they would accept of no
other conditions but that of battle from the men of Leinster." He
then clapped spurs to his horse and quitted the field with his followers.
The second cause was that Ceallach, the son of the King of Ossory, who
was on Cormac's side, also rode otf the field with the men of Ossory.
A ceiieral rout followed. Neither boy, man, or cleric found quarter ;
all were slaughtered indiscriminately. Cormac rushed towards the
van of his division. His horse fell on the slippery blood-stained field
His neck was broken in the fall, and he died saying, " Into Thy hands
O Lord, I commend my spirit." And then some wicked folk came up
and pierced the body with their spears and cut off his head.^
His loss was mournful, for he was a King, a bishop, an anchorite,
a scribe, and profoundly learned in the Gaehc tongue. He was the
author of " Cormac's Glossary," by far the oldest attempt at a com-
parative vernacular dictionary made in any language in modern Europe,
which has fortunately come down to us. " The Psalter of Cashel," now
lost, was compiled by him, or under his direction. He appears to have
known Latin, Greek, Hebrew, and Danish, and to have been one of the
finest old Gaelic scholars of his day, and withal, an accomplished poet.
His verses are now lost.^*^
The forty years' rest ended in 915 A.D. The year before a
new fleet o£ Norsemen arrived at Waterford, and were soon
followed by strong reinforcements. Munster was raided, and
the Gael roused for once to something like united action.
Flann Sinna died at Tailtin in 916, and was succeeded by Niall
Glundubh, the son of Aedh Finnliath. Niall at once sum-
moned all his forces to meet the new invasion. He led the
Northern and Southern Ui Neill to the aid of the men of
Munster and Leinster. The campaign, however, resulted
favourably for the Norsemen. The men of Leinster were
defeated at Cennfuait, Kildare was raided, and Dublin
reoccupied. Next year (917) Niall reassembled his forces
» Keating (O'Mahony) 529.
" Four Masters, 903 (rede, 908), A.D. Hyde, LiUraiure, 420.
A WlN-fER CiRCtJiT. 283
and advanced on Dublin. A decisive battle was fought on the
19th of October at Kilmashogue, near Rathfarnhara, about five
miles south of the present city. The army of the High King
included the Southern and Northern Ui Neill, the men of
Little Ulster, and the men of Oirghialla. The men of Leinster,
Munster, and probably the men of Connacht, were engaged
defending their own territories. The Gael were routed with
red slaughter : Niall was slain with, some say, twelve kings or
chieftains around him. The Four Masters mention Conchobar,
Ua Maelseachlainn, regdamna of the Southern Ui Neill ; the
King of Little Ulster, the Lord of Oirghialla, and many others.
" Sorrowful that day was holy Erin
To view Magh-Neill {i.e., Erin) without Niall."
This defeat was, however, avenged in the following year by
Niall's successor, Donnchadh, the son of Flann Sinna, who
gained a signal victory over the Norsemen in North Dublin.
There fell as many of the nobles and rank and file of the North-
men as had fallen of the Gael in the battle of Kilmashogue.
Notwithstanding this victory, we find Godfrey in possession of
Dublin in 926, from which he plundered Armagh, but spared
the " oratories," the Ceile De, and the sick. The Northmen
then sent divisions north and east and west. The force that went
north was encountered and defeated by Muirchertach of the
Leather Cloaks, as he came to be called, the son of Niall
Glundubh, and from this time until his death (943) he was the
mainstay of the Gael in the north. He was then King of
Aileach, and, if he had survived, would undoubtedly have been
the next Ard Righ in succession to Donnchadh. He married,
first, Flanna, the daughter of Donnchadh, the Ard Righ, and,
secondly, in 940, Dubdara, the daughter of Ceallach, King of
Ossory. The entries in our Annals respecting him are most
interesting, and present a view of the social state of Erin,
which is almost incomprehensible.
926 — Two victories by Muirchertach over the Northmen.
The second at Cluain na g-cruimthir, where 800 were killed.
927 — War with Duach, the chieftain of Glenn Given
(Derry), during which the chieftain was slain.
In the same year Donnchadh, the Ard Righ, was prevented
from holding the fair of Tail tin by Muirchertach inconsequence
of a challenge of battle between theai, but God separated them
without slaughter.
284 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
929 — Donnchadh led an army to Leitrim against Muircher-
tach, but they separated without bloodshed.
932 — Torolbh, the jarl, commanding a fleet of Korsomen on
Lough Neagh, was slain by Muirchertach,
933 — Muirchertach was defeated by Gaelic chieftains in
Meath.
938 — A challenge of battle between Donnchadh and Muir-
chertach until they made peace, united their forces, marched to
lay siege to Dublin, and spoiled the country of the foreigners
from Ath Cliath to Ath Truistin, near Athy.
939 — The Northmen plundered Aileach and took Muircher-
tach prisoner to their ships on Lough Swilly, but he made his
escape from them soon after, to the great joy of the Gael.
940 — A hosting by Donnchadh, Ard Righ, and Muirchertach
into Leinster and Munster until they took hostages from them.
941 — Muirchertach raided Ossory and the Desies ; made a
royal expedition to the Hebrides, from which he brought back
much plunder and booty, and hearing that Callaghan of Cashel
had made a slausfhter of the Desies for submittinof to him the
/ear before, he set out in mid-winter of the same year on his
famous circuit of Erin with one thousand picked warriors.
This expedition is celebrated in a famous poem by Cormacan
Eigeas {the Poet), who died in 948. Ho was the chief poet of
the Northern Ui Neill and the friend and follower of Muircher-
tach, and seemingly accompanied him. The poem is very
interesting, as it illustrates the manners of the time, social and
political, and deserves, consequently, a somewhat detailed
notice. It commences :—
Muirchertach, son of the valiant Niall (Glundubh),
Thou hast taken the hostages of luis Fail,
Thou hast brought them all unto Aileach,
Into the grianan of the splendid steeds.
Thou didst go forth from us with a thousand heroes
Of the race of Eogan of the red weapons
To make the great circuit of all Erin.
O, Muirchertach of the yellow hair,
The day that thou didst set out from us eastwards
Into the fair province of Conchobar (Mac Nessa)
Many were the tears down beauteous cheeks
Among the fair-haired women of Aileach.
They spent a night at Oenach Cros in Antrim — " Not more
pleasant to be in Paradise " — and brought Loingseach of Linno
as a hostage ; a night at Don Eachach on the Ravel Water,
A WINTER CIRCUIT. 285
and brought the King of Uiidia with them ; a night at Magh
Rath (Moira) ; a night at Glenn Righe (the vale of the Newry
river) ; a night at Casan Linne in Down; and a night at Ath
Gabla on the Boyne.
We were a night at Ath Cliath ;
It was not pleasing to the foreigaera.
There was a damsel in the fort
Whose soul the son of Niall was. ^^
She came forth until she was outside the walls,
Although the night was bad throughout.
Bacon and fine good wheat and joints of meat and fine
cheese were given by the beautiful queen, and a coloured
tnantle for each chieftain.
We carried off Sitric of the treasures ;
To me was assigned the duty of keeping him,
And there was not put upon him a haadcuif,
Nor a polished tight fetter.
They were a night at Dunlavin ; a night at cold KilcuUen.
The snow came from the north-east.
Our only houses, without distinction of rank,
Were our strong (sheep ?) skin cloaks.^2
They brought off Lorcan, King of Leinster, with a rough,
bright fetter on him. They spent a night at Ballaghmoon,
near Carlow, and passing into Ossory, received food, and ale,
and hogs from its hospitable chiefs. " Not a man of them
returned to his house without a beautiful present of dress,"
They received coigne and tribute from the Desies, and marched
to Cashel.^^ The men of Munster were disposed to fight, but
Gallaglian of Cashel said : —
O men of Munster, men of renown,
Oppose not the race of Eogan ;
Better that I go with them as a hostage.
We took with us, therefore, Callaghan the Just,
Who received his due honour ;
A ring (of gold ?) of fifteen ouaces on his hand,
And a chain of iron on his stout lags.
They spent a night in Hy Gairhre (Coshma, Limerick) ; a
night at Killaloe, and then turned homewards. At Headford
'* Haliday suggests that the damsel was Donnflaith, the daughter of Miiir
cliertach and the wife of Olaf. She was the mother of Gluncaran.
^2 Aji 5COCA1I cotif A ctioicinn. This is generally rendererd " leather cloaks."
They were, we think, dressed sheep-skins, untanned and unshorn.
1^ Diibdira, wife of Muirchertach, was, as we have stated, the daughter of the
chieftain of Osaory.
286 EARLY IRISH HISTORT.
they found the Kings of Connact awaiting them, and Conchpbar,
the son of Tadg the Bull-like.
The ard-righ of valiant Connact
Came with us, without a bright fetter,
Into the green grianan of Aileach.
Nearing home,
A giolla was despatched to Aileach
To tell Dubhdara of the black hair,
To send women to cut rushes.
" Bestir thee, Dubdara " (spoke the giolla),
•' Hero is company coming to thy house,
Attend each man of them
As a king should be attended."
The noble kings were attended " as if they had been clerics,"
" ten score hogs ; tea score cows ; 200 oxen ; three score vats
of curds, which banished the hungry look of the army," twelve
vats of choice mead ; and all this was the gift of the queen,
from her separate property, which was repaid to her by Muir-
chertach, " twenty hogs for every hog, a good return." At
the end of four months, Muirchertach offered the " noble kings
to Donnchad, the ard righ, who courteously declined to accept
them from his son-in-law, and said :—
Receive my blessing nobly,
May Tara be possessed by thee.
May the hostages of the Gael be in thy house,
O good son, O Muirchertach."
Muirchertach was slain (943) in a battle fought near Ardee,
by Blocar, the son of Godfrey, and the foreigners, who marched
to Armagh after their victory, and plundered it. The hostages
taken to secure Muirchertach's succession were then liberated,
" The word grianan occurs twice in the poem.
(1). Into the grianan of the splendid steeds (line 4),
1r 1" SfSA^'Ati JALt 5tioi-oeAc.
Tuis O'Donovan renders : —
Into ths stone-built grianan (palace) of steeds.
(2). Into the green grianan of Aileach (line laO),
1 n-5tie4TiAn uAine Oitij.
This O'Donovan renders : —
Into the green Palace of Aileach.
The 151st line is :—
A-oAij 1 nioi j Ai uAine.
A night on green M»gh Ai (a celebrated plain in Roscommon).
We think that the meaning of grianan here is not a palace, but an enclosure,
or paddock ; a meaning which it bore until recently, as we have already
stated (c. xiv.), in the Highlands. " Enclosures in the Highlands were called
grianans" — Bonwick, Druids, 192. The troop of hostages, with their attendants,
were, we think, accommodated in tents, or "wattle and dab" buildings, within
the " horse paddock," at Aileach. The epithet "green" is then as applicable in
line 150 as in line 151, but we confess we do not understand what is meant by a
green, stone-built, palace. Muirchertach is referred to in line 16 as " of the great
steeds" (rhoj\-5tioi'Di5;).
A WIXTEB CIRCUIT. 287
and on the death of Donnchadh (944), the rule of alternate
succession was disregarded, and Congalach, of the southern
branch, became Ardrigh. A rival claimant then appeared,
of the line of Conal Gulban, Ruadhri Ua Cannannain, from
Tir-Conaill, He defeated Congalach, who was supported bv
Olaf Cuaran, in a pitched battle near Slane, in Meath (947).
In 948 he defeated Congalach again and plundered Bregia.
He encamped at Muine Brocaia, and there assumed the
name and authority of High King of Erin, and the " dues
of the King of Erin were sent to him from every quarter "
{Four Masters). In this position he was attacked by the
foreigners and after a desperate struggle in which six
thousand of the foreigners fell, Ruadhri was slain in the
"counterblow" of the fight, but the victory finally remained
with his army. Congalach then held the sovereignty without
further opposition, and led a hosting into Munster, raided and
plundered West Munster, and killed the two sons of Kennedy,
the son of Lorcan, Echtighern and Donnchuan. In the follow-
ing year (951), he made a hosting with a great fleet on Lough
Derg, and took the hostages of the Munster men, over whom
he obtained sway after some opposition.
In the same year, probably whilst Congalach was away
harrying the men of Munster, the foreigners, under Godfrey^
the son of Sitric, raided Meath, and " carried upwards of three
thousand persons with them into captivity, besides gold, silver,
raiment, and various wealth and goods of every description."
During the reign of Congalach an event occurred (950),
which deserves particular notice, as showing the use to which
a Round Tower was put in time of danger. The cloictech of
Slane in Meath was burned by the Northmen, " with its full of-
relics and distinguished persons, and the crozier of the patron
saint, and the bell, which was the best of bells." The following
items are also of interest : —
951 — Clonfert plundered by Callaghan of Cashel and the
Munster men.
953 — Clonmacnoise plunderedby the foreigners of Limerick,
and the Munster men along with them.
954 — Inis Uladh, near Donard (Wicklow), plundered by
Olaf Cuaran and Tuathal, son of XJo-aire.
954 — Saighir Ciaraan plundered by the Munster men.
Congalach raided Leinster in 956. The Leinster men sent
288 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
word to Olaf Cuaran, and the foreigners of Ath Cliath, who
laid a battle ambush for him, and he was slain with many
chieftains near the LifFey, not far from Dublin. He was sue-
ceeded by Domhnall, son of Muirchertach, of the northern Ui
Neill. Many years afterwards Domhnall, the son of Congalach,
made alliance with Olaf, and fought a pitched battle against
the High King at Kilmoon, near Dunshaughlin in Meath, in
which he was victorious, but failed to oust King Domhnall, who
continued to reign until he died (978) at Armagh. He was
afterwards called Domhnall of Armagh, because he resided there
a long time to do penance. He was succeeded by Maelseachlainn
IL, Maelseachlainn the Great, who was the last Ardrigh of the
Gael who ruled without opposition.
During the sixty years that elapsed from the battle of
Kilmashogue (919), the Northmen of Ath-cliath had made no
addition to their territory near Dublin. As in the previous
period, they were seemingly settling down into the position of
Gaelic chieftains. There were frequent intermarriages and
shifting alliances between them and the older settlers, now
with one chieftain, now with another, for war or plunder.
Many of them had probably been by this time converted to
Christianity.
There were also raiding expeditions conducted by them-
selves independently. Territories were harried, termons
violated, and monasteries rifled, but these regrettable incidents
occurred also amongst the Gael themselves. The fusion of the
two branches of the Nordic race, if yet distant, seemed to be
approaching. From the accounts given in the historical
romances, and particularly in the " War of the Gael with the
Gaill" to which we shall refer later on, the notion is widely
diffused that the country was at this time, and thence onwards
to the battle of Clontarf (1014), reduced by the tyranny of the
Northmen to a state of absolute barbarism and savagery.
This, however, was not the case. The raiding meant little
more than cattle-lifting. The number of men slain in the
numerous combats was not great, and is no doubt, as is usual
in such cases, greatly exaggerated by the annalists and bardic
narrators. It is probable, we think, that more Irishmen in
proportion to population fell in battle or died from wounds
and disease in the wars of the nineteenth than in the wars of the
tenth century. Nor could the rifling of the monasteries have
A WINTER CIRCUIT. 289
been fruitful of much spoil after the earlier attacks. There were
no treasures hoarded or deposited in them, and their modest
equipment of valuables, consisting, apart from the cattle,
principally of relics, shrines, chalices, and other altar requisites,
could be easily hidden away if the cloicteach was not available
or was considered insecure. And the burning of the " wattle
and dab " buildings could not be much more than a temporary
inconvenience. It has been said that it was harder to burn
than to build them. We make these observations, not to
extenuate the outrages, but to call attention to exaggerations.
The most serious part of these raidings by the Northmen was
the taking of captives. In several instances recorded in our
annals the captives were carried off to the ships and were, no
doubt, either ransomed or reduced to slavery. With the Gael
we hear very little of prisoners or captives. In battle, apparently
quarter was seldom if ever given. Later on we shall meet with
an instance where the defeated Northmen were put to death or
sold as slaves at Singland near Limerick. We are, therefore,
on the whole prepared to find that notwithstanding much that
needed reformation in the social state, learning and literature
flourished during the ninth and tenth centuries. The most
celebrated names besides Cormac Mac Cuilenain, already men-
tioned, were Flann Mac Lonain, " the Virgil of the Gael," a
contemporary of Cormac's ; Cinnaeth Ua hArtacain ^-\-9l3),
Eocaid O'Flynn ( + 984 c), Cormac an Eigeas, Maelmarra of
Fahon, MacLiag, and others. Nor was the gentler sex unrepre-
sented. Gormlaith, the wife of Niall Glundubh, was a poetess
of considerable merit. Many of her poems express her sorrow
for his loss. We give the following graceful lines as a sample :
Monk, remove thy foot,
Lift it off the grave of Miall ;
Too long dost thou heap the earth
On him with whom I fain would lie.
Too long dost thou, Monk, there
Heap the earth on noble Niall ;
Thou brown-haired friend, though gentle,
Press not with thy shoe the earth,
Do not firmly close the grave,
O Priest, whose office is so sad,
Lift off the bright-hair'd Niall Glundubh ;
Monk, remove thy foot.^^
" Dean of Lismore's Book. 75 Gaelic, 101 English.
[ 200 ^
CHAPTER XX.
BRIAN BORU.
WE must now follow the fortunes of the Northmen in the
South, after the forty years' rest. They arrived in large
numbers at Waterford, and after the battle of Kilmashogue
(918) sailed up the Shannon with a great fleet, under the
command of Gormo, the son of Elgi, called Tomar by the Gael.
They took possession of Inis Sibhtonn, now King's Island at
Limerick ; went up the river to L. Ree ; plundered the islands
there, and burned Clonmacnoise. In 924, CoUa, the son of
Barill, the lord of Limerick, went again on L. Ree, raided
Brawney in Westmeath, and killed the chieftain Echtigern.
In 929 they invaded Connact, and went on L. Corrib ; but in
tiie following year a great slaughter was made of them by the
men of that province. They next made a hosting into Ossory,
under Ivar, the grandson of Ivar, and encamped on the famous
plain of Magh Roighne, where they were attacked in the
following year by the Northmen of Dublin, under Godfrey,
who was probably in alliance with the men of Ossory. He had
previously (923 or 924 A.D.) attacked them at Limerick, and
had been defeated by Tomar, the son of Elgi. On this occasion
he was successful, and expelled the invaders. Ivar soon after
made alliance with Ceallachan of Cashel, King of Munster, and
they plundered the monasteries, Cluain Eidneach and Cilia-
chaedh, and the territory of Meath (939). Clonmacnoise was
again plundered by the Munster men and the Northmen of
Limerick; and St. Mullins, on the Barrow in Carlo w, was
raided from the sea by Larac, after whom, probably, Waterford
was named Port Lairge. In 959 Clonmacnoise was again plun-
dered by Mahon, the eldest brother of Brian Boru, and the
Munster men. In 960 it was plundered again by the men of
BRIAN BORU. 291
Ossory, and the men of Munster raided " the termon of Ciaran
eastwards from the Shannon.'' On the death of Fergraidh, in
960, Mahon became King of Manster,^ and in the same year a
fleet of the son of Olaf and the Ladgmans came to Erin, and
phindered Louth and Howth, and the Ladgmans afterwards
sailed to Munster, and raided Ui Leathain, and pkmdered Lis-
more and Cork. They went after that into Ui Leathain
(S.E. Cork), where they were overtaken by Mael-Chiithe Ua
Maeleitinn, who made a groat slaughter of them, killing 3S5,
so that there escaped not one of them, only the crows of three
ships. A prey by Sitric Cam, from the sea to Ui Colgain ; ^
but he was overtaken by Olaf with the foreigners of Ath
Cliath and the Leinster men. Olaf was victorious, and wounded
Sitric with an arrow in his thigh, who escaped to his ships
after the slaughter of his people.
In 960, (F.M.), the Ui Neill led an army into Munster,
and committed great plunders there. In 961, Feargal Ua
Ruairc, King of Connact, mado a slaughter of Mahon's men.
Three score were killed, including three grandsons of Lorcan.
In 962 Kildare was raided by the Northmen, and a great
number of seniors and ecclesiastics were taken prisoners, who
were afterwards ransomed. The full of St, Brigid's great house,
and the full of the oratory of them, is what Niall Ua
h-Eruilbh purchased with his own money. A victory by the men
of Ossory over Olaf, the son of Sitric, was won in the same year
at Inistiogue on the Nore.*
The Four Masters state that in 965 Mahon plundered
Limerick and burned it. But we are anticipating. Up till this
time the Norsemen of the South appear to have occupied
nearly the same position as the Northmen in Ath Cliath.
They held the fort and town of Waterford (Vedra Feordr,
Weacher Haven), and some territory near it — probably what is
now known as the barony Gaultier (Gall tire), and the fort and
town of Limerick, and some territory near it — probably what
^ The succession of the Kings of Munster, according to the Book oj Leinster,
was as follows : — (1) Corniac mac Cuilenainn ; (2) Flabhertach, Abbot of Inis
Scattery ; (3) Lorcan ; (4) Ceallachan of Cashel ; (5) Mael Fithortagh ; (6)
Dubhdabairind ; (7) Fergradh ; (8) Mathgamhain or Mahon ; (9) Molloy, the son of
Bran ; (10) Brian Boru, " killed in the battle of the weir of Cluain Taerhh (Ciontarf)
by the Leinster men and the foreigners." — Todd, War of the Gael, 239.
2 Ui Colgain was in the territory of Olfaly, and co-extensive with the barony
of Philipatown, in the King's C!ounty.
3 Petrie Round Towers, 227.
292 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
was afterwards known as the Ostman's Cantred— and they
made alliances, intermarriages, and raidings like their kins-
men ; and, to crown all, they fought with one another just like
the native chieftains. There was no attempt t'^ form a com-
bination of the Gael against them ; no Gaelic chieftain un-
furled a national flag, and summoned his countrymen to a war
of liberation. The bardic account of their position and doing.
in Munster is, however, very different. The author of the
"War of the Gael with the Gaill" approaches the subject from
the tribal standpoint. He is a panegyrist of the Dal Cais, to
which tribe he belonged, and by whose bounty he was, no
doubt, rewarded. He tells us that " they excelled all other
tribes in Erin as a bright watch-tower, shining above all the
light of the earth, as the bright sun outshines the noblest stars
of the sky.'' And in order to show how much the men of Erin
owed to their deliverers from bondage, he extols the bravery,
the superior discipline, and the armaments of the Norsemen,
while he paints a dark picture of their cruelty and oppression : —
There was a king of them in every territory and an abbot in every
church (!) and a steward in every village, and a soldier in every house;
80 that none of the men of Erin had power even to give the milk of his
cow, nor as much as the clutch of eggs of his hen, in succour or kind-
ness to an aged man or to a friend, but was obliged to preserve them
for the foreign steward, or bailiff, or soldier. And though there might
be but one milk-giving cow in the house, she durst not be milked for an
infant of one night, etc. And an ounce of silver for every nose, besides
the royal tribute afterwards every year ; and he who had not the means
of paying it had himself to go into slavery for it. In a word, though
there were a hundred hard steeled iron heads on one neck, and a
hundred sharp, ready cool, never-resting brazen tongues in each head,
and a hundred garrulous, loud, unceasing voices from each tongue, they
could not recount, nor narrate, nor enumerate, nor tell what all the Gael
suffered in common from this valiant, wrathful, foreign, fiercely pagan
people. None of the victorious clans of many-familied Erin could give
relief against the oppression because of the excellence of their " polished,
ample, heavy, trusty, glittering " corselets, and their hard, strong,
valiant swords, and their well-ri vetted long spears, etc., and because of
their thirst and hunger for the sweet grassy land of ll.rin. There was,
however, a certain, gracious, noble, high-born, beaxitiful tribe in Erin
who never submitted to oppression. These were the deliverers, the
famous Dal-Cais.
The style and character of " the War of the Gael with the
Gaill" may be judged from the foregoing extract. It is marked
with the malady of the decadence. There is the accumulation
of epithets, and the exaggeration we have already noticed in
BRIAN BORU. ^93
the modern prose cadditions to the Tain. This disease, how-
ever, is not pecnliar to Gaelic writers. It appears in the
Orphic literature of Greece and is found in an acute form in
the Hymn to Ares, which is Orphic, though usually classed as
one of the Homeric Hymns. We have observed it also in
Hindustani, where it takes the milder form of the duplication
of verbs of similar meaning, emasculating the force of that
smooth and interesting language. In our bardic narratives^
sense and thought are thus often diluted until their presence
can, with difficulty, be detected in the flow of words that supplies
the sonorous vocalization of the reciter. This rhetorical or
recitative verbosity is, as Huxley has justly remarked, " the
most deadly of literary sins." What O'Donovan has said of
the " Three Fragments " is equally true of the " War of the
Gael." " The more lengthened stories and details of battles are
curious specimens of Irish composition. Some of them have
evidently been abstracted from long bardic descriptions, and
are interspersed with the wonderful, the wild, the supernatural,
and the incredible."^
On the other hand, judging from the Homilies which have
reached us, the preaching of the Word was singularly free
from the vicious methods of the bardic reciters. The sermons
are masculine in thought and treatment, level with the subject
and the occasion, marked by simplicity and sincerity, and free
from vapid banalities and frigid ecstasy.
After the Northmen built their fort on King's Island, at
Limerick, and placed their ships on the Upper Shannon, they
harried the country in every direction. The brunt of the
attack, however, fell on the Dal Cais in Thomond. The Norse
occupied a good strategic position at Tradry (Bunnratty), on
the Shannon, in Clare, about six miles from Limerick, where
tliey built a strong fort. Mahon, and his brother, Brian,
retired into the woods and fastnesses of North Clare and
South Galway, from which they carried on a guerilla war-
fare for some years. Mahon, wearied out at length, made a
truce with the Northmen, but Brian persisted in continuing
liostilities. He was at length reduced to the greatest straits.
Mahon then came to his aid, and they called a meeting of
Llie Dal Cais, and put the question of peace or war to the
* Three FraameTits, Prcf ice.
294 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
«
assembled tribesmen. Every voice was for war. A hosting was
then made into Kerry, where the Eoganachts, and the men
of Muskeriy in Cork, joined them, and the Northmen in those
parts were driven out. Mahon then marched to Cashel, and
took possession, and became King of Munster. This was
probably in 964. Sitric of Limerick then summoned a great
muster of his supporters. These included Gael as well as
Norsemen, "for there were many Gael who stood by him, not
so much through love of him, as through hatred of the
Dal Cais."^ Foremost among these were Donovan, lord of the
Ui Fidhgeinate, and Maelmuadh (Molloy), the son of Bran,
lord of Desmond. Ivar marched with his forces towards Cashel
to crush the Dal Caia. When Mahon heard of this he sum-
moned his tribesmen to a council of war, and they determined
to march to Cnamhcoill, near Tipperary. At this moment an
outlying branch of the Dal Cais — the Dealbhna from Delvin in
Westmeath — arrived in the nick of time to aid their clansmen
— one hundred well-armed men, under Cathal, the son of
Feredach, " the king soldier and champion of Erin." This
was welcomed as an omen of victory. The decisive battle was
then fought (968) at Sulchoit, about 2h miles north-west of Tip-
perary. It lasted from sunrise to mid-day, and ended in the
complete rout of the Norsemen and their allies. The fort and
town of Limerick, with their rich spoils, fell into the hands oi
the victors. The prisoners were then collected on the hill of
Saingel (Singland), near Limerick, and " every one that was fit
for war was put to death, and every one that was fit for a slave
was enslaved." Mahon followed up this victory, and defeated
the enemy in subsequent engagements, and took the hostages
of Munster, in particular those of Donovan and Molloy. Ivar
escaped with Olaf, the son of Olaf, to the East — i.e., Wales,
where, however, he did not succeed in making good his
footing. He returned in a year's time with a great fleet,
entered the western harbour of Limerick, took possession of the
larger islands of the Shannon, and fixed his headquarters at
Inis Scattery. Shortly afterwards the conspiracy was hatched
between him, Donovan, and Molloy (who represented the
claims and hatreds of the line of Eogan Mor), which ended in
the assassination of Mahon, The details as to the murder
* Todd IVar of the Gael, cv't
BRIAN BORU. 205
given in the " War of the Gael" are confused and contradic-
tory and we shall not reproduce them here. Todd observes
that the narrative in the " War of the Gael " bears internal
evidence both of interpolation and mutilation.
A probable version, in our view, is, that Mahon went from
Bruree to meet MoUoy in Desmond, and that Molloy sent
forward an escort to meet him to the border of the county
of Cork. The escort lay in wait for Mahon. The road
from Bruree to Mallow and South Munster passed through
Kilmallock, and across Sliabh Caein, through a pass known
as the Red Gap (Bearna Dhearg). According to tradition,
it was in this pass that Mahon was assassinated by the
escort. Mahon was probably proceeding on a peaceful mission,
and had the guarantee and protection of the Bishop of Cork,
who promptly excommunicated all persons who were concerned
in the murder. We would infer that the motive for tbe
murder was revenge, not policy. The conspirators gained
nothing by the crime. Brian, who took the place of Mahon,
*' was not an e^cr in the place of a stone nor a wisp of hay in
the place of a shillelagh." He forthwith demanded that Molloy
should be given up, and announced that no cwmhal or eric
would be taken. It was an intertribal homicide, and, as we
have seen, he was not bound to take an eric, but might insist
on life for life. The Dal Cais marched against Molloy, and a
pitched battle was fought at Bealach Leachta, somewhere
between Ardpatrick, in Limerick, and Glanworth, in Cork, in
which Molloy was slain and his army routed.*' Brian next
attacked Donovan, whose daughter was married to Ivar of
Waterford, and who was in alliance with, and sustained by the
Norsemen. Donovan was defeated and slain, and Brian be-
came the undisputed King of ail Munster — in 978, two years
before the accession of Maelseachlainn 11,
The facts recorded in our annals, about which there is no
controversy, prove conclusively that the Northmen were never
conquerors of Munster, nor present there in overwhelming
^ In this bloody engagement (Bealach Leachta), Murrough, the eldest son o*
Brian, by Mor, daughter of O'liine (Ua h'Eidhin) Prince of Hy Fiachre-Aedhne,
in Coimact, made his first campaign, and although but thirteen years old, engaged
hnnd to hand with Maelmuidh, and slew this murderer of his uncle.— O'Halloran,
History II., 236.
Brian had probably married Mor during the time of his early struggles in
North Clare and Soutli Connact.
296 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
numbers. The capture of King's Island, which, without a
fleet of boats, could only be attacked by a ford across the
Shannon, and the defeat of the Norsemen at Sulchoit, though
they were aided by two powerful chieftains like Molloy and
Donovan, is sufficient to disprove the legend we have quoted
from " The War of the Gael." The raids of the Norsemen in
Munster were of the same character as their raids elsewhere,
and there was no effective occupation of any territory in
Munster except in the immediate vicinity of Waterford and
Limerick, which places were, no doubt, used to some extent
as trading stations. We must therefore reject the bombastic
description in the bardic narratives, which were manifestly
fabricated to magnify the services of the Dal Cais and to
glorify the hero, Brian Boru,
Maelseachlainn II. became ard righ, as we have stated in
980. His accession was peaceable. The two rig dainna repre-
senting the Northern and Southern branches of the Ui Neill,
who had prior claims, had been slain in battle in 977 by Olaf,
the son of Sitric. Maelseachlainn began his reign with a great
victory over the Northmen at Tara (980), and afterwards
defeated the foreigners of Ath Cliath and the Western Isles
with great slaughter, killing Ragnall, the son of Olaf, the
rig damna of Dublin. Olaf then went over sea to lona, where
he died, " after penance and a good life." Maelseachlainn soon
after made a great hosting with the King of Ulidia against the
foreigners of Ath Cliath. They beleagured them for three
days and three nights, and brought thence the hostages of
Erin, including Domhnal Claen,^ King of Leinster, and the
guarantees (ecipib) of the Ui Neill, besides. And they got
their full demand from the foreigners, to wit, two thousand
kine, with jewels and treasures, and, moreover, with the full
freedom of the Ui Neill from tribute, from the Shannon to
the sea. 'Tis then that Maelseachlainn proclaimed the famous
rising (ef eipgi),^ when he said, " Let every one of the Gael who
is in the foreigners' territory come forth to his own country
^ O'Donovan says that this is the first mention of a Christian Norseman in our
annals. Ware thought the Norse of Dublin entered Christianity about 930, A. D.
The movement towards the Faith began, no doubt, as early as the intermarriages.
The fii'st Ostman bishop was consecrated in 1054 at Canterbury, to the archbishop
of which see the succeeding Ostman bishops owed obedience.
* ereit<5i. The Four Masters have poti udccAj^^-eArS^TS, i.e., published a
proclamation, so eAf5At)te is probably the correct word.
BRIAN BORU. 297
for peace and comfort. That captivity was the Babylonian
captivity of Erin. 'Twas next to the captivity of helL"^
In 982 Maelseachlainn, in conjunction with Gluniarn, the
son of Olaf, King of Ath Cliath, raided Leinster. The presence
of Gluiniarn may have been voluntary. He was closely related
to Maelseachlainn ; and though these relationships did not count
for much in Erin, the connection would probably have been
sufficient to set him moving against Leinster. i° The inter-
marriages between the royal families of the Gael and the
Northmen at this point are inextricably confused, and it must
suffice here to say that Donnflaith, the daughter, or grand-
daughter, of Muirchertach of the leather cloaks, was wedded first
to Domhnall, son of Donncadh, ard righ, to vrhom she bore
Maelseachlainn II., and secondly to Olaf Cuaran, to whom she
bore Gluniarn. Domhnall, the King of Leinster, was also on
his side supported by a contingent of Norsemen from Water-
ford, under the command seemingly of Gilla Patrick, the son
of Ivar. The Leinstermen were routed and Gilla Patrick slain,
and many perished, " both by drowning and killing."
In 984 Maelseachlainn raided Connact, destroyed the islands
{i.e., Crannogs) and reduced Magh Ai to ashes.
In 990 Maelseachlainn was victorious over the men of
Thomond, killing six hundred, defeated the united forces
of Leinster, Munster and a Norse contingent, and took Domhnal,
King of Leinster, prisoner.
In 992 he raided Connact again and took from it " the
greatest boroma that a king had ever brought." Brian advanced
with the men of Munster and Connact to L. Ennel, near Mul-
lingar, " but he did not take a cow or a prisoner, but escaped by
secret flight " on the approach of the Ard Righ.
In 996 Maelseachlainn burned Aenach Tete (Nenagh),
plundered Urmumhan (E. Munster)^^ and routed Brian and
the men of Munster in general. In this year too lie carried
» Tigernach, Hcv. Celt, xvii., 142. (Stokes).
"> Todd, War of (he Gael, cxlviii.
*^ Thomond was originally confined to North Tipperary and North-East
Limerick, and Urmumhan or East Munster lay to the east of this, and is not to be
confounded with the baronies of Upper and Lower Ormond, to which the name was
ignorantly transferred in the usual way. Clare was afterwards added to Thomond
by the Dalcais as Sword-land. Finally, according to Keating, Thomond extended
from Leim Chouchulaiun (Loop Head) to Bealach Mor (Ballaghmore, Upper Ossory),
and from Sliabli Echtghe (Slieve Aughty) to Sliabh Ecbhlinue, now Sleibhte FeidU-
limidh, in Tipperary, te^BAfi rt& 5ce<i)(c, 26L
298 EARL'S IRISH HISTORY.
off from the foreigners of Ath-Gliath by force the ring of Toinar
and the sword of Carlus.^^
We have traced thus far an outline of the doings of
Maelseachlainn during the first 14 years of his reign and shall
now turn our attention to Brian. After he became King of
Munster on the death of Mahon (976) he commenced by the
subjugation of the Decies and took the hostages of Munster
" and of the churches lest they should receive rebels or thieves
into sanctuary." Ossory was next subdued and Gilla Patrick,
the king, taken prisoner and forced to give hostages. Brian then
marched into Leinster and took hostages from the two kings,
Domhnall Claen, King of the Eastern, and Tuathal, King of
the Western plain of the Liffey. This was in 984, eight years
after the murder of Mahon, and he thus became King, not of
Munster alone, but of all Leath Mogha. According to our
annals Connact next engaged his attention. He assembled a
great fleet of 300 boats on Lough Derg, rowed up the Shannon
to Lough Ree, raided Meath to Uisneach, plundered Brefni
(Leitrimand Cavan), and finally " did great evil " in Connacht,
killing Murghes, the rig damna. It is noticeable that a con-
tingent from the foreigners of Waterford was aiding him in this
foray.
Maelseachlain and Brian were now face to face, and a conflict
appeared to be inevitable and imminent between them. This,
however, was for the time avoided, and a treaty of peace and
alliance was made between them (999) at Plein Pattoigi, on the
shore of Lough Ree. All hostages in the custody of Maelseach-
lainn, whether of Munster or Leinster, Ui Feachrach Aidhne
or Ui Maine, or of the foreigners (of the South ?), were to be
surrendered to Brian, and Maelseachlainn was to be recognised
as sovereign of Leath Chuinln " without war or tresspass of
Brian."
According to the Annals of Ulster and the Four Masters,
Maelseachlainn and Brian then joined their forces and marched
^'^ We extract the following particulars from Haliday : — The Godar were
princes, judges and priests. The emblem of the military jurisdiction was the
sword, of the sacerdotal dignity a massive ring, usually kept in the temple of Thor,
but sometimes attached by a smaller ring to the armilla of the Godi. Witnesses
were sworn on the " holy " ring. There is a splendid specimen of a large ring
with a small ring; attached to it now in the museum of the Royal Irish Acaflemj-.
It was found in Clare. The last notice of the sword of Carlus is that it was taken
by Mael na-mbo in 1088. The ring was the famous " collar of gold won from tlie
proud invader," of Moore. — Haliday, Scand. King, 127.
BRIAN BORU. 299
against the foreigners of Ath Cliath (998), " and carried ofF the
hostages and the best part of their valuables from them."
They do not mention the Treaty of Plein Pattoigi, the par-
ticulars as to which we have taken from The Wars of the Gael.
Whether these particulars are accurate or not, it is evident that
some such arrangement preceded the attack on Ath Cliath.
The Northmen now joined the men of Leinster and both deter,
mined to fight for freedom. Brian then marched into Leinster,
where he was joined by Maelseachlainn and advanced to Glen-
mama, near Danlavin, in Wicklow, on his road to Dublin. A
fierce battle was fought there. The Norsemen and the
Leinster men were routed with red slaughter, and the allied
forces entered Dublin, and, wo are surprised to hear, found
there " gold, silver, and captives " — prizes of war — which they
carried off. They burned the fort and expelled the King —
Sitric, the son of Olaf. In the following year, however, Brian,
in whose " half '' the fort was situated, granted them terms of
peace and took their hostages. Brian had evidently for a long
time aspired to, and determined to secure, the overlordship of
Erin. In furtherance of this ambition he now cemented his
alliance with the Northmen by matrimonial ties. He gave his
daughter in marriage to Sitric, and, according to some accounts,
himself married Gormlaith, the mother of Sitric. The improba-
bilities of this story are, however, so great that we think it may
be safely rejected as a bardic invention in connection with a
romance or ursgeul, dealing with the cause of the Battle of
Clontarf, Gormlaith was the daughter of Marchadh, the son
of Finn, chieftain of OfFaly, and the sister of Maelmordha. who
became King of Leinster. She was married first to Olaf
Cuaran, to whom she bore Sitric, and secondly to Maelseach-
lainn II., to whom she bore Conchobar. As her second husband
was then alive she could not contract a civil or a religious
marriage with Brian or anybody else. Moreover, Brian's second
" one wife," Dubhcobbtaigh, the daughter of Cathal O'Connor,
King of Connact, was then alive. Her death is recorded by the
Four Masters at 1009, and Brian had wars enough on hands
without bringing an old campaigner to Kincora to fight for the
overlordship of it with his lawful wife, who, seemingly, remained
with him until her death. Moreover, such an outrage would
have alienated the powerful clans of the Sil Muireadhaigh, the
clansmen of the " one wife," and probably provoked immediate
SOO EARLY IRISH HISTORY
hostilities. The Four Masters, however, state that she was the
mother of Sitric, of Donncadh, the son of Brian, and of
Conch obar, the son of Maelseachlainn, and add : It was this
Gormlaith that ^^ took the three leaps of which it was said : —
Gormlaith took three leaps,
Which no woman shall take to the day of judgment.
A leap at Ath Cliath (Olaf), A leap at Tara (Maelseachlainn),
A leap at Cashel off the goblets higher than both (of Ca6)
(Four Masters, a.d. 1030).
Brian's son Donncadh had, as we shall see, an important
command in 1014, and before the Battle of Clontarf was de-
tached to plunder Leinster. If he was the son of Gormlaith he
could have been then, at the most, only 13 years old. There ia
no evidence to which any importance can be attached that
the Gaelic chieftains could put away or repudiate their wives.
and marry again with religious solemnities. It is highly
probable that there were in Erin, as elsewhere, marriages
within the forbidden degrees, as the discipline of the Church
was unsettled in the matter until the fourth Council of
Lateran (1215.) There may have been more serious irregu-
larities than the marriage of cousins amongst the foreigners
in Dublin, Waterford and Limerick ; but that the early Church
ever sanctioned divorces a vinculo, or that there ever was any
civil recognition of such divorces we utterly disbelieve.
Having secured the submission and alliance of the North men,
Brian assembled a great force, with contingents from South
Connact, Ossory, Leinster, and the Norsemen of Dublin and
marched towards Tara. This was an invasion of " Conn's
Half," and is described by our annalists as the " first turning of
Brian and the men of Connact against Maelseachlainn." The
main advance was preceded by a force of Norse cavalry, which
was met by Maelseachlainn and cut to pieces. Brian then re-
treated without fighting, plundering, or burning. He then
formed an alliance with the foreigners of Waterford, and
organised the forces of Leath Mogha and South Connact.
Against this combination and organisation, the Southern
Ui Neill, unaided, were powerless ; unless they were supported
'^ The nr,ir/pi(l is too long to he given here. It represents Cormlaith aa then
installed as Qneen at Kincora and inciting her brother Maelmordha to make war
on Brian. It will be found in Keating (Mahony) 399. We do not think there is
any suggestion of impropriety, as Todd conjectured in the use of the word
*' leap " here.
BRIAN BORU. 301
by the Northern Branch submission to Brian was inevitable.
]\j aelseachiainn sent Gilla GomgallUa Sleibhin, the Chief Bard
of Ulster, to his kinsmen to appeal for help. A metrical
account of his mission is given by the author of the " War of
the Gael." It contains a fervid exhortation to Aedh Ua
Neill, King of Aileach, and Eocaid, King of Ulidia, and Cathal,
King of Connact, to rescue Tara from the grasp of Brian, and to
unite the I'ace of Eremon against the usurpation of the line of
Heber. Aedh Ua Neill refused to help, and said that when
the Chieftains of the North were Kings of Tara they were able
to defend it without applying for external aid, and that he
would not risk the lives of his clansmen for the sake of securing
the sovereignty of Erin for another man. On receiving this
reply, Maelseachlainn went in person to Aedh and ofiered to
abdicate in his favour, and give him hostages. Aedh received
this proposal favourably, but said it was necessary to consult
his clansmen. He then summoned the Cinel Eogain to consider
the proposal. The tribesmen voted unanimously against fight-
ing the Dal Cais. Aedh then requested that the question of
peace or war should be considered in secret session. It was
then resolved not to accede to Maelseachlainn's request unless
he would agree to cede to the Cinel-Eogain. " Oue half of the
men of Meath, one half of the territory of Tara." i.e. half of the
possessions of the Southern Branch. On hearing this,
Maelseachlainn left in great wrath, summoned a meeting of his
tribesmen, and placed the matter before them. They resolved
not to cede half their territory, but to submit to Brian without
fio-htinsr. Maelseachlainn then " went to the house '' of Brian,
made submission, and offered to give him hostages. The effect
of all this was that the status of Maelseachlainn was reduced to
that of a provincial King, and in the brief words of Tigernach,
" Brian reigned " in his stead. ^*
A great deal of warmth has been introduced into this part
of our story. Some represent Maelseachlainn and some Brian as
the true patriot, who deserves our admiration and sympathy, and
Brian is charged with treachery. In our view neither of them
did anything which the other would not have done in his place,
nor did either of them do anything which modern statecraft,
as practised amongst the most civilised nations, could afford to
^* 1001 A.D. Brian Boroma regnat. The Four Masters regard the reiga
as commencing in 1002 A.D.
302 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
criticise very severcl}'. The one thing needful at the time was
to proclaim the extirpation of tribalism, and to establish the
brotherhood and equality of all the men of Erin. Unfortunately
for Erin the chieftains were warriors rather than Statesmen,
and fighting amongst themselves, they left to the future historian
the melancholy duty of recording how a nation of brave men
surrendered their liberty without ever fighting with their
whole strength one pitched battle in its defence For this, aa
we shall see from this point onward, the tribalism and political
incapacity of the chieftains must be held responsible. There
were, however, extenuating circumstances.
[ 303 3
CHAPTER XXI.
CLONTARF.
AFTER the submission of the Southern Ui Neill, Brian pre-
pared for the struggle with the North. He first proceeded
to Connact with the forces of Leath Mogha and the
usual contingent of foreigners and obtained hostages without
opposition. He then marched to Dundalk, reinforced by the
men of Connact, intending to penetrate Ulster through the
eastern passes. But the men of Ulster stood on guard and
would not permit him to pass onwards, and he retired " without
booty, spoil, or pledges," The North, however, did not remain
united. Shortly afterwards a fierce contest arose between
Aedh, King of Aileach, and Eocaid, King of Ulidia, and a
battle was fought at Craibh Talcha in the north of Down., in
which the Ulidians were routed. Eocaid, his brother, and his
two sons were amongst the slain. Aedh was also amongst the
slain. Brian now advanced again against Ulster as far as
Ballysodare in Sligo, intending to make a royal circuit of Erin,
but he was again stopped by the Ui Neill of the North, mainly
by the Cinel-Conaill. H'" then marched to Armagh, where he
stayed a week and left ^0 oz of gold on the altar, and caused
to be entered in the Great Book (Bibliotheca) his recognition
of the claims formulated in the Liber Angueli. He obtained
the hostages of Ulidia, and probably of all the North, except
the Cinel-Conaill, but failed to make the circuit of Erin. This
he accomplished in 1006, crossing the Erne at Eas Rundh, and
marching through Tir-Conaill and Tir-Eogain, and crossing the
BannatFeartas Camsa (the Cutts) below Coleraine into Dalradia
and Dalaradia reached Castlekieran, near Kells, about
Lammas-tide. He did not, however, according to the Four
Masters, succeed in obtaining the hostages of the Cinel-Conaill
or Cinel-Eogain. His army then separated, " the foreigners
going by sea round to their fortress." In 1011, leading the men
of Munster, Leinster, and the Ui Neill of the South, and joined
by the Cinel-Eogain, Brian invaded Tir-Conaill and carried ofi*
three hundred captives and a great prey of cattle as well as the
chieftain Maelruanaidh ua Maeldoraidh in submission as a
304 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
hostage to Cenn-Coracdh. It was only after this that Brian
could be regarded as an Ard Righ without opposition. But in
reality his title was never admitted by the North, and they did
not obey his summons to the field at Clontarf. This seems to
indicate that he did not then hold their hostages. Now it must
not be supposed that all the warlike energy of the time was
consumed in these operations. On the contrary, there were
countless raids and combats between inferior chieftains in all
parts, the particulars whereof will be found in our annals.
Brian now began to build numerous forts, and lifted the boroma
" with great severity." The Leinster men, joined by the
foreigners, rose against him. Brian then led the men of
Munster to Sliabh Mairge, near Carlow, and plundered
Leinster to the suburbs of Dublin, to which he laid siege. He
remained before it until Christmas (1013), when he was forced
to retire from want of provisions, intending to return in the
spring. Both sides then prepared for the decisive struggle,
which took place on Good Friday (1014) at Clontarf, within
view of the ramparts of Ath Cliath. It was by no means a
conflict between the Gael and the Northmen. The Gael were
divided. The men of Ulster, Ulidia, and North Connact stood
aloof. The men of Leinster and Ossory fought shoulder to
shoulder with the Norsemen, So Brian had only the Dal Cais,
the men of South Munster and South Connact, and, we will add,
the men of Meath under Maelseachlainn, though some writers
say that they stood aloof on the day of battle. The Northmen
had, in addition to their Gaelic allies, large contingents from
their kinsmen over sea. " The foreigners of the west of
Europe," say the Four Masters, " assembled against Brian and
Maelseachlainn and brought with them ten hundred men with
coats of mail." Numbers even approximately exact cannot be
given, but we conjecture that there were on each side from six
to eight thousand fighting men. The fort of the Northmen
stood on the south side of the Liffey, which flows from west to
east, on the spot where now stands the Castle of Dublin. It
communicated with the Fine Gall on the north side of the
river by means of the " hurdle ford " and a bridge which was
afterwards known as Dubhgall's Bridge. On the south side of
the river the tide came up over College Green almost to the
precincts of the fort. On the north side, about two miles north
of the Liffey, was the little river Tolka. It now flows, roughly
CLONTARP. 305
speaking, from west to east under Ballybough and Newcomen
Bridges into Dublin Bay. About four miles north of the Tolka,
within the Fine Gall, are the Hill and Harbour of Howth,
where, we suggest, the foreigners landed before advancing to
attack Brian. There are no reliable materials available for
giving a detailed account of the battle. We shall state briefly
the conclusions, few in number, which we have drawn with
much diffidence from the annals and the bardic narratives-
The scene of the fighting lay between the Lifley and the Tolka,
behind which the forces of Brian were marshalled, The Dal
Cais and the men of South Connact held the line of the little
river. The men of South Munster were next, while the men
of Meath, under Maelseachlainn, lay away to the south towards
Kilmainham. We are unable to accept the view that the
Norsemen landed from their ships on the strand of Dublin
Bay under the beard of Brian. Nor are we impressed with the
importance of the fact that the full tide on Good Friday, the
24)th of April, 1014 (a neap tide), coincided nearly with sunrise
along the Olontarf shore and was full about 5.30 a.m., and the
evening tide full at 5.55 p.m. The ships of the Norsemen
carried from 50 to 100 men, say an average of 80 each, and
were propelled by oars or used sails under favourable wind
conditions. Thus 100 ships would carry 8,000 men, who would
be all available for fighting if the ships were beached.' Now
the foreshore between the Tolka and the Liffey is accurately
described by Dalton as " an area which is at the pleasure of
the tide, alternately a pool of muddy brine and a surface of
oozy strand," ^ and it does not rec^uire very deep militar}'
knowledge to understand that landing 8,000 men from 100
ships in the presence of an active and vigilant foe on such a fore-
shore would be a very hazardous operation, if it were at all prac-
ticable. We have very little doubt, therefore, that the Northmen
made Howth their base, and advancing in suitable formation
deployed on the Tolka at sunrise.* They attacked at once, pro-
^ See, however, the interesting Report of Todd and Haughton, Royal Irish
Academy's Proceedings (1857), 485.
^ Daltou, History of Dublin.
* The Booh of Leinster in the List of Kings states that Brian ** was killed ?')i
the Battle of the Weir of Clontarf by the Leiustermen and the foreigners." This
weir was on the Tolka, probably at Ballybough Bridge, and the battle was
commonly called " Cath Coradh Cliiana Tarbh, — The Battle of the Weir of
Clontarf." Tarlough, the grandson of Brian, is said to have been drowned at this
weir, holding in his grasp two, or some said three Norsemen, who were also
drowned there. Todd, War of the OaA, 2.38, p. clx<xiv.
X
306 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
bably finding the enemy not quite prepared.' The Dal Cais and
the men of South Connact (ihe Ui Fiachach Aidhe and the Ui
Maine) were routed, with great slaughter. The men of South
Munster were overthrown, and both were pursued to their
respective camps, which some of the Norsemen commenced to
plunder. At this juncture, whilst the Norsemen were scattered
in pursuit of the beaten foe, Maelseachlainn came up with the
men of Meath, from Kilmainham, and delivered his attack,
probably on the flank of the disordered Northmen. It was
completely successful. The Northmen were overthrown, and
driven with red slaughter to their sliips, in which the remnant,
we may presume, escaped, as no mention is anywhere made of
the ships of the Northmen having been captured by Mael-
seachlainn. The following is the account of tho battle in the
Four Masters, A.D. 1014 :—
A spirited, fierce, vengeful, and furious battle was fought between
them — the like of which was not to be found in that time — at Clontarf,
on the Friday before Easter (April 23rd, 1014,) precisely. In that
battle were slain Brian, monarch of Erin, who was the Augustus of
the West of Europe, in the 88th year of his age ; Murchadh, son of
Brian, rig damna, in his 63rd year ; Conaing, son of Donncuan, Brian's
brother, and Turlough, son of Murchadh, his grandson. His three
companions, whom they name, were slain, and Tadg O'Kelly, lord of the
Ui Maine, and Maelraonaidh Ua hEidhin (probably the brother of
Brian's first wife), chieftain of Fiachrach Aidhne ; the chieftains of
Fermoy and Cearraighe Luachra, and the sons of the chieftain of
Corca Bhaiscin, of the chieftain of the Eoganacht of Killamey, and
of the chieftain of Mar, in Scotland. The forces of the Northmen
were afterwards routed by dint of battling, bravery, and striking by
Mealseachlainn, from the Tolka to Ath Cliath. It was Brodar, King
of the Danes of Denmark, who slew Brian. The ten hundred in
armour were cut to pieces, and at least three thousand of the foreigners
were slain.
The Annals of Innisfallen say that Brian, with his son
Murchadh, went round the army, before the battle began, with
a crucitix in his left hand and a sword with a golden scabbard
in his right hand, to show them that he would die along with
them in fighting for them. The attack was then delivered, and
Brian was killed by Brodar before he went from the battle *
(ir fo be sin, i.e., Bruadar do mart Brian rea teithe as an ccath).
' If Brian had anticipated an attack on that day he would undoubtedly have
recalled an important dotachmentof his forces that was away foraging in Leiuster,
under his son Donncadh.
* O'Connor, Rerum. Hib., II. 671.
CLONTARF. 307
There fell of the Northmen, 3,012, and of the Leinstermen,
3,000.6
Maelseachlainn is charged with treachery on this occasion
by the writers of the South. Some merely state that he with-
drew his forces on the eve of the battle, while others go further
and assert that he had a secret understanding with the North-
men. The mildest form of the accusation is that he abstained
from giving timely help. The common-sense of mankind
allows to a beaten army the privilege of grumbling and framing
excuses of this kind, without, however, attaching to them
any evidential value. We make no doubt the deposed ard
righ would be very glad to have the chance of clearing off old
scores with Brian, if he could do so with safety. A Gaelic
proverb, quoted by Keating, says, " Never trust a reconciled
enemy." The chance, however, did not then come to Mael-
seachlainn. If he had an understanding with the Norsemen,
his attacking them during the fight, whilst they were victorious
would be inexplicable, or, at least, highly improbable. If he
had no understanding, his allowing Brian's army to be crushed
^ From the Annals of Tigernach, who died 74 years (1088) after the battle,
the leaf containing the entries from 1003 to 1017 is missing {Jiev. Cel., xvii., 354).
The Four Masters refer to the Book of Cloiimacnoise, which, no doubt, contained
the entry which they reproduce, and which accords in substance with the entry
in the Annals of Ulster. MacGeoghegan's account, one of the many " insets," as
we think, in his translation, follows a panegyric on Brian, based on the bardic
eulogies. Tigernach'a account was probably in the Book of Clotimacnoise ; it
certainly did not escape the notice of Tadg of the Mountain, the chief annalist,
who spent 15 years, as Colgan tells us, labouring indefatigably in searching our
muniments.
The text of the Annals of Ulster runs ; " Jniciti cac c|10-6a erop^A, no tia
fpic inncfAmAi'l. mAi-oi|i i4|iom poji gAtlu "] poji tAijniu (i cofAig) co |iuf
"OiteJAic uile -oo teif." We suggest that "i cof A15 " should be placed in the
previous sentence, so the translation would accord with the Four Masters, and
read : — "A fierce battle was fought between them, the like of which was not to be
found, at first — Afterwards the foreigners and Leinstermen were routed, so that
they were all destroyed entirely." Hennessy does not translate lApom, which
is the really importapt word, as opposed to 1 cof A15, at first.
With the view we present, too, accords the story told of Sitric and his wife,
Brian's daughter. They stood on the ramparts of the fort, surveying the fight.
"Well do the Norsemen reap the field," said he. " Many a sheaf do they cast
from them." " The result," she answered, " will be seen at the end of the day."
And at the close of the fight she retorted, " The foreigners," said she, " appear to
me to have taken possession of their native land ("Oucun)." " How so ? " said he.
" They are going into the sea, as is natural for them," she replied.
An admirable bardic account, spirited and highly imaginative, of the battle
will be found in Dalton's History of Dublin, p. 71. It was prepared by O'Donovan,
from the " Oath Cluanna Tarbh " chiefly, but corrected from other accounts,
Brian is represented as praying in his tent during the fight, but the annals say
nothing of this, and the Annals of Ulster state that it was in the " counterblow "
of the battle he fell, which we think more likely, and more in keeping with the
character of the brave old warrior. Other bardic accounts will be found in the
Wars of the Oael, and the Leahhar Oiris, recently printed in Erin, There is also
an account in the Gaelic Journal, Vol. V.
808 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
would expose himself to be attacked by the whole force of the
victorious Norsemen, who would give no quarter to a foe who
had so often worsted them. If, on the other hand, he sulked
in his tent while Brian was fighting, and Brian came off
victorious, he could not doubt but that hot chastisement would
await him. At the bar of history Maclseachlainn therefore
stands acquitted.
Brian had made a will before the battle, in which he
directed that if he fell he should be buried in Armagh, thinking,
no doubt, that the seat of the primacy was the proper resting
place for the ard righ and Imperato7' Scotorum. So Maelmuire,
the co'arb of St. Patrick, went with his clergy to Swoids to
meet the body, which, as well as the remains of Murchadh and
Turlough, were conveyed to Armagh, and after being waked
for twelve nights, with due solemnities, were laid in a new
tomb in the cathedral. The other chieftains and men of rank,
to the number of thirty, were conveyed to their territorial
churches and interred there.
The character of Brian has been variously estimated. Some
say he was a patriot statesman, others that he was an ambitious
usurper. In our judgment he was neither; he was a tribal
chieftain, fighting for tribal ascendancy, nothing more or less.
This was the weakness of his position and the cause of his
failure.
There is no reason to think that he ever formed the notion
of founding an hereditary dynasty ruling in the order of primo-
geniture. Nor is it likely that the Dal Cais would have
tolerated any such innovation. He might, no doubt, have had his
eldest son made tanist in his lifetime. He, however, abstained
from doing so. Probably he saw no necessity for doing so, as
Murchadh would, undoubtedly, have succeeded him if he had
survived. If Brian stood forth as the champion of a united
Erin his first duty was to consolidate his power in Leath Mogha,
and conciliate the good-will and loyalty of the South. Instead
of doing this he re-imposed or certainly continued the exaction
of the odious "boroma,"^ and made the men of Leinster his
deadly enemies. He was a brave warrior and a good soldier —
^ Baroraa. — According to the Brehon Law Tracts, as we have seen, the Ard
Righ had uo right to remit food rents, except for his own lifetime. This would, we
assume, apply to a cow-rent like the horoma. And, in fact, Fineachta's successors
enforced the payment of iu frequently. Brian was thus, probably, claiming what
was lawful, but not expedient.
CLONTARF. 309
r^ood in organization, in strategy, and in tactics. Starting
from small beginnings, he achieved, from a military point of
view, success of the highest order against a rival (Maelseachlainn)
who was also a singularly active and capable commander. It
is fantastic to represent him as a crusader fighting for the
cause of religion against the pagan Norseman. The Norsemen
in Erin were his allies, when it suited him. They were largely
Christian, and Brian's daughter was, as we have stated, married
to Sitric. The Northmen f lom over sea were also to some extent
Christian, and certainly came to Ciontarf for hire and plunder,
and not to wreak vengeance or extirpate Christianity. The
worksof peace attributed to Brian by the Southern panegyrists
— the advancement of religion and learning, the building of
churches, bridges, etc., throughout Erin, had no existence in
fact. With the best intentions he could have done nothing
outside Thomond, and even there he was too busy with fighting
andthe preparations for fighting to have much time to spare for
peaceful labours. It would, however, be unfair to brand Brian
as an usurper. The ardrighship did not go by hereditary descent,
nor was it until the time of Niall of the Nine Hostages that it
became the appanage of a single tribe, and the monopoly of it
by the Ui Neill might in the same sense be regarded as an
usurpation with equal justice. Moreover, Brian was compelled
to go forward in self-defence. His territory was plundered
again and again, and insult was added to outrage when the
venerated inauguration tree at Magh Adhair was cut down.
He had no option, therefore, but to submit or fight, and in
fighting for safety he was irresistibly led to fight for
supremacy.
After the battle the Munster clans assembled on the crreen of
Ath Cliath, and Donchadh, the son of Brian and his successor,
who had been away foraging in Leinster, came in with a prey
of twenty oxen (!) and took command. Sitric was not further
molested, and the clans departed homewards. At Mullaghmast,
in the south of Kildare, the Eoganachts claimed the sovereignty
of Munster by alternate right, under the will of Olioll Olum,
Donchadh refused, and said that Brian and Mahon had got
the sovereignty by force of arms, and not by succession. A
battle was imminent when the Eoganachts quarrelled amongst
themselves. Cian, the son of MuUoy, claimed the whole of
Munster. Domhnall, the son of Duibhdabhoirann, asked
310 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
" Why should we fight the battle ; what profit do we seek from
it?" '-What profit dost thou seek," said Mulloy, "but to
cast off the Dal-Cais ? " " Wilt thou then give me an equal
share of as much of Munster as we shall conquer ? " said
Domhnall, " That I will not give," said Cian. " On my
word, then," replied Domhnall, " I will not go with thee to fight
the Dal-Cais.'' Domhnall subsequently (1016) led an army to
Limerick to attack the Dal-Cais, and was defeated by Donchadh
,'tnd Tadg, who appear to have made up their quarrel. Tadg
was afterwards killed treacherously by the men of Ely, Tigernach
says, at the instigation of his brother, Donchadh.
The defeat of the Northmen at Clontarf hadno political result
of immediate importance, except the displacement of the Dal-
Cais, and the restoration of Maelseachlainn. It is a mistake to
suppose that it was followed by the expulsion of the Northmen.
A careful examination of Tigernach, the Annals of Ulster, and
the Four Masters shows that things quickly resumed their usual
course. Maelseachlainn made royal hostings, and took hostages*
and the inferior chieftains waged petty wars a few months after
the battle, as if it was one of the ordinary incidents in an ordi-
nary year. We shall not try the patience of our readers by
giving details of these tribal quarrels. The names would be
different, but the story would be the same as that so often told
already. The position of the Northmen, however, cannot be
satisfactorily explained without some illustrative extracts from
our annals to correct the false impressions that have been put
in circulation by the historical romances.
1015. Maelseachlainn set fire to Ath Cliath, and burned the houses
outside it. He then plundered Ui Ceinselagh.
1018. Slausjhter of foreisnevs at Odbha, near Navan.
1019. Kells plundered by Sitric, who carried off innumerable spoils
and prisonex'S.
1020. Sitric routed at Delgany with red slaughter. The foreigners
routed at Tlachtga by Maelseachlainn.
1022. Foreigners routed at sea by Ulidians.
1023, Raid by foreigners to South Bregia.
1025. Flaibhbheartach Ua Neill, from Ailech, made a hosting into
Magh Breagb, and carried off the hostages of the Gael from the
foreigners. The men of Ossory marched to the Tolka and took hostages
from the foreigners.
1027. A hosting by the foreigners and the lord of Breagh to Slieve-
bloom, where they were defeated.
1072. (Tigernach) Diarmaid, son of Mael na-mbo (he was king at
Ath Cliath) king of the Bretons, and the Hebrides, and Ath Cliath, and
CLONTARF. 811
Mogh Nuadhat's half, was killed by Concobar, son of Maelseachlainn
in the battle of Odhba, and an innumerable slaughter of foreigners and
Leinster men around him. Godfrey, the grandson of Ragnall, then
became king, and was afterwards expelled from Ath Cliath by Murchadh
O'Brien.
1084. Donnchadh, son of the Cailleach O'Rourke, fought Muir-
chertach O'Brien and the foreigners near Leixlip, 4,000 were slain,
and the head of O'Ruarc taken to Louth.
1100. Muirchertach O'Brien brought a great fleet of the foreigners
to Derry. They were cut off by killing and drowning.
1102 Inis Scattry was plundered by the foreigners.
1103, A hosting by the men of Erin to Ath Cliath to oppose
Maghnug and the foreigners ; but peace was made, and Muirchertach
O'Brien gave his daughter to Sichraidh, the son of Maghnus, and many
valuables and gifts.
1116. Defeat of Leinstermen by Domlmall O'Brien and the
foreigners.
1119. Turlough O'Conor took the hostages of Ath Cliath, and took
away the son of the King of Tara who had been in captivity there.
1127. Turlough made his son Conchobar King of Ath Cliath. He
was dethroned the next year by the men of Leinster and the foreigners.
He then placed another king over them, viz., Domhnall, son of Mac
Faelain.
1137. The siege of Waterford by Diarmaid Mac Murrough, King
of Leinster; and Conchobar O'Brien, King of the Dal-Cais, and the
foreigners of Ath Cliath and L. Garman (Wexford), who had two
hundred ships on the sea. They carried off with them the hostages of
the Deesi and of the foreigners of Waterford.
1154. Muirchertach Mac Lochlainn went to Ath Cliath, and the
foreigners submitted to him, and h« gave them 1,200 cows as a
" retainer " (,n a cuAtiAfcAt).
About this time (1154) we reach the threshold of the
Angevin epoch, and events occurred of far-reaching importance
to the Gael. 1152 was a memorable year. A synod was held
at Kells, and probably a second at Mellifont. Eleanor of
Acquitaine was divorced from her husband, Louis VII. of
France, on the 18th of March, 1152, on the ground of con-
sanguinity in the fourth degree. She had lived with him
since their marriage in 1137, borne him two daughters, and
brought him, as a marriage portion, the duchy of Acquitaine.
After fourteen years, however, it was discovered that they were
within the forbidden degrees. Louis was sixth in descent
from Thibaut, Duke of Acquitaine, through Adelaide, his
daughter, who was married to Hugh Capet (987-996), and
Eleanor was sixth in descent from the said Thibaut throucfh
his son William jier a brasJ Two months after the divorce,
"> Revue des Questions Historiques, 1890, p. 407, for Pedigrees. Martin, Eist.
France, II., 461.
o
12 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Eleanor gave her hand and brought her duchy to Henry
Plantagenet, who was crowned King of England at West-
minster in December, 1154. In the following year, according
to the best authorities, he received from Pope Adrian IV. the
famous "Privilege," which is commonly, but inaccurately,
referred to as the Ball Laudabiliter. This will ensracfe our
attention in a future page. For the present wo shall confine our.
selves to another famous event which happened in 1152 — the
capture,abduction,or elopement of Dearbhforgaill(Deravorgaill),
the wife of Tighernan Ua Ruairc. She was the daughter of Mur-
chadh Maelseachlainn, King of Meath ; and being 44) years of
age in 1152 was probably married for over twenty years to
Tighernan, who was chieftain of a territory comprising, but
more extensive than, the present counties of Cavan and Leitrim.
In that year there was a meeting between Turlough O'Conor
and Ua Lochlainn, King of Aileach, at Magh Erne, between
the Erne and the Droweis, where they made friendship " upon
the Staff of Jesus and the relics of St. Columba."
Turlough then proceeded into Munster, which he divided
into two parts between the MacCarthys and the O'Briens. He
then went into Meath, where he was joined by Ua Lochlainn
and Diarmaid MacMurrough, King of Leinster. They then
divided Meath into two parts, and gave Westmeath to Murchadh
Ua Maelseachlainn, and East Meath to his son Maelseachlainn,
the brother of Dearbhforgaill. They then attacked and
defeated Tighernan Ua Ruarc, and took Conmhaiene, i.e.,
Longford, and the southern part of Leitrim from him, and
made Gillabraide Ua Ruarc chieftain of it, leaving Tighernan,
we assume, the rest of the territory. All this indicates a policy
of breaking up and weakening the chieftainries. It was on this
occasion that the romantic elopement of O'Ruarc's wife is
fabled to have taken place. A careful sifting of the evidence
proves that there was no elopement and no romance. The
entries in the Annals of Ulster from 1131 to 1155 are wanting,
but the taking away of Dearbhforgaill is referred to by the
continuator of Tigernach from 1088 to 1179. This is, no doubt,
the earliest account that has reached us. We give it textually
from the translation of Stokes.^
1154. The daughter of Murchadh came again by flight [An'etot)] from
Leinster.
f Rev. Celt., xvi.,ni.
CLONTARF. 313
Tko annalist says nothing about an elopement, and con-
siders that she was detained by Diarmaid. Diarmaid was in
his 64th year when he carried off Dearbhforgaill.
The account in the Four Masters runs thus, and explains
why she was carried off: —
Dearbforgaill daughter of Murchadh Ua Maelseachlaian, the wife
of Tighernan Ua Ruarc, was brought away by the Kiug of Leinster, i.e.,
by Diarmaid, with her cattle and furniture, and he took (sent ? t^o paoi)
them with her according to the advice of her brother, Maelseachlainn.
There arose then a war between the Ui Sruain (the O'Rourkes and the
O'Reillys of Cavan and Leitrim), and the men of Meath.
Dearbhforgaill appears to have been possessed of consider-
able property as her separate estate. In 1158 she gave 60oz. of
gold to the clergy at the consecration of the church at Mellifont.
This was a very large sum in those days. Brian Boru, as we
have stated, only gave 20oz. when he visited Armagh, The
cattle and furniture were probably removed for safe keeping, as
hostilities were imminent, and were restored to her after she
returned. The Four Masters tell us (1153) " Dearbhforgaill came
from the King of Leinster to Tighernan Ua Ruarc again. An
army was led by Turlogh O'Connor to meet (x^ccoinne) Mac
Murchadh, Kiug of Leinster, to Doire Gabhlain, and he took
away the daughter of Ua Maelseachlainn and her cattle from him,
so that she was in the power (or protection) of the men of Meath.
On this occasion Tighernan Ua Ruarc came into his house and
gave him hostages.''
The efiect of all the entries is, in our judgment, that
Dearbhforgaill was taken away for safety, and as a hostage,
with the consent of her family, and that she was restored to
Tighernan when he made his submission to Turlough. She
died at Mellifont in 1193 in the 85th year of her age. Our
annalists do not say " after a good penance." And let us
charitably assume that she had nothing very serious to
repent of.^
^ MacGeoghegan's account is an "inaet." Hs makes it a case of misconduct
and elopement. O'Donovan in his note does not refer to the entry from the con-
tinuator of Tigernacli. Ladies were sometimes taken and ransomed.
[ 314 ]
CHAPTER XXII.
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH.
IN beginning an inquiry into the organisation of the Early
Church we are met at the threshold by a curious and
famous script, known as the " the Catalogue of the Saints."
Apart from this our progress would be easy and rapid. In the
South of what is now France, where St. Patrick made his
ecclesiastical studies and received his pastoral training, there
was, as we have seen, an episcopal church, monasteries, and a
body of solitaries, whom we may call hermits or anchorites,
who were considered to excel the others in spiritual perfection.
The Episcopal Church was divided into territorial dioceses,
each under its own bishop ; and the diocese was sub-divided
into territorial parishes, each under its own pastor and his
assistant priests. We should therefore naturally expect that
our apostle would introduce into Ireland the system which he
found established there. And this is, in our judgment, what
actually took place. And first, as to the dioceses : They were
certainly in most cases, and probably in nearly all, co-extensive
with the several tribal territories. St. Patrick addressed him-
self in the first instance to the chieftains. The conversion of
the king was promptly followed by the conformity of the clan.
The High King of Tara, Dichu in Dalaradia ; the chieftain of
Tirawley, in Connact, King Aengus, at Cashel, and Daire, at
Armagh, are instances, and there were, no doubt, others. We
may add that this was the method which St. Columba followed
with the Picts ; King Brade was his first important convert.
When the chieftain was secured, the Church was organised in
bis territory under a bishop ; churches were built throughout
it, and districts attached to them for pastoral duty. The church
buildings were called in Gaelic, congabala, and sometimes, we
think, also ferta. The church itself was often called teach, or
teach mor — the great house, and when it assumed larger propor-
tions, teampull. We have already quoted a passage on this
point from the Tripartite, which, for convenience, we repeat
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH. 315
here : — " In this wise, then, Patrick measured the ferta, namely,
seven score ft. in the enclosure, and seven and twenty in the
great house (cig mop), and seventeen ft. in the chule (kitchen),
and seven ft. in the aregal, and in that wise it was he used
to found the congabala always." Todd thinks the tig mor
was the residence of the priests. In our opinion it was the
church. It was circular, we assume ; 27 ft. in diameter, and
not much inferior in area to the oblong churches which were
afterwards erected. The Teamp nil na h Fear, in Inismurray,
is only 25 ft. 6 in. in length, by 12 ft. in breadth.^ The chule,
17 ft. in diameter, was, we think, " room and kitchen " in one,
the residence which sufficed for the simple wants of the pioneers
of the Faith. The aregal was, we suggest, the embryo round
tower. It was a circular building 7 feet in diameter, made,
possibly, in imitation of the fire-house which, we assume, existed
in the ferta on the slope of Tara. It was probably built solidly
of stone in most places, and used as a storehouse and a strong-
hold, and was also possibly a " fire-house."
There was a teach na teinidh, or fire-house, in Inismurray,
the existing remains of which are described by Wakeman : —
" The fire-place consists of seven stones, four of which are
placed on edge and set deeply in the ground, in the manner of
a pagan cist. The sides face as nearly as possible the cardinal
points, and are therefore not in a position coincident with the
surrounding walls of the teach. The present walls are the
most modern structure within the cashel. The area enclosed
by them is oblong, 17 ft. 4 in. by 11 ft. 4 in. There is no
doubt, we think, that the original walls were circular. The
clachan near it, called the ' school-house,' is nearly circular,
bee-hive in structure. The stones are unhammered, without
cement or mortar. This fire-place was covered with a slab,
called the leac an teinidh, which the natives aay was broken
up by the workmen employed under the Act for the Preserva-
tion of Ancient Monuments, and used in repairing the old
walls. The natives all aver that here of old burnt a perpetual
fire, from which all the hearths on the island which had from
any cause become extinguished, were rekindled. Some say
that it was only necessary to place a sod of turf on the leac
when combustion ensued."^
' Dunraven, /r. Architecture, 94.
• Wakeman, Antiquities on Inismurry (1892), p. 54.
316 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
The fire was, we infer, kept "smoored" or "raked" under
the stone, and the fire tended from the side, for which purpose
three of the seven stones were not fixed in the ground, but
left loose. The aregal may have had such a fire-place, and
there was probably some such teampull na teinidh in the
ferta at Kildare and Tara.
The internal diameter of the Round Towers is, on the averasre
9 ft. ; generally something less. The internal diameter of
the tower at Clondalkin, for instance, is 7 ft. 4 in. at the
base and 6 ft. 6 in. at the top. The height of the aregal
would not, we may assume, be great. The Round Towers were
from 50 to perhaps considerably over 100 ft. in height, all built
from the inside without scaffolding in storeys, and at different
periods. The earlier towers are of rude " spawled " masonry ;
the later ones are of ashlar or hammered stone. The erection
of a tower by Cormac ua Cillin at Tomgraney, in Clare, is
mentioned in the Chronicon Scotorum at A.D. 964, This is
the earliest notice of the building of a tower in our texts.
Since Petrie, our best antiquaries are agreed that the uses of
these towers were ecclesiastical in connection with the churches
near which they were built, primarily — we should say — like the
aregal, or strong-houses, as a protection for men and valuables
against marauders. They were used also, when the elevation
increased, as belfries and as watch-towers. And we may
remark that the necessity for such strongholds existed long
before the coming of the Norsemen. Churches were plundered
and termons violated by the Gael themselves long before that
period. Petrie fixed the date of a few of the existing towers
in the fifth century. Though it should prove that none of the
existing towers (about eighty in number) were older than 800
A.D. we have very little doubt that the aregal in some stage
of development continued in ecclesiastical use from the earliest
times.
To educate the priests who were to man these ramparts of
the Faith, monasteries like Marmoutier, or collegiate commu-
nities, if St. Germanus's establishment may be called such,
were manifestly necessary, and we accordingly find, in due
course, schools established from time to time at Armagh,
Moville, Clonard, Derry, Durrow, Clonmacnoise, Glasnevin,
etc. But the pastoral work of the congabala could not
have been done from these monastic centres, nor could the
THE OEaAMISATION OF THE CHURCH. 317
parish priests and their assistants, whether they had taken vows
or not, be properly regarded as cenobite monks. To illustrate
these views let us take a particular instance. The present Co.
Clare was occupied by three tribes, with distinct tribal lands
belonjying to each. Each of these was formed into a diocese.
In the south-west of Clare the See Inis Scattery (Innes Cath-
raighe) was co-extensive with the Corca Baiscin (Eremonian).
In the North the See of Kilfenora was co-extensive with the
tribe-land of the Corca Modruaidh (Clanna Rury). In the
centre the See of Kiilaloe represented roughly the tribe-land
of the Dal-Cais. But the diocesan arrangement was strictly
territorial, not tribal. The bishop had no jurisdiction over
tribesmen outside the diocesan tribe-land. The diocese of Kil-
macduagh was co-extensive with the tribe-land of the Ui
Fiachra Aidhne, but the bishop had no jurisdiction over the
Ui Fiachra of the Moy, men of the same tribe further north in
Connact. In the same way, Annaghdown was co-extensive with
lar Connact. The tribe-land of Corca-Laidhe corresponded
with the diocese of Ros Ailithre, or Ross, in the south-west of
Cork. Ossory very nearly represents the tribe-land of the
Ui Osraighe, and Dromore the tribe-land of the Ui Ecac-Iveagh.
Others might be mentioned, and we find it stated in our texts,
what the circumstances of the case suggest, that our Apostle
founded a bishopric in every important tribe-land.
Three bishops for the county of Clare would appear
now-a-days to be too many, and the excessive number of
bishops was, at the period our history has now reached,
mentioned amongst the sins of the Irish Church by foreign
ecclesiastics. But it was a necessity. None of the three tribal
chiefs in Clare would allow the priests in his territory to be
subject to the control of the neighbouring chieftain's bishop,
and would have insisted, if need were, on having a bishop of
his own. Moreover, the conditions under which episcopal
duties had to be performed then were very different from what
they are now. There were no roads, no bridges, no railways,
cycles or motor cars. The bishop made his visitations on foot,
and had probably to undergo more hardship in discharging' the
duties of his office than a bishop would have to undergo now
who was burthened with the spiritual care of the whole county.
Authorities are agreed that the number of dioceses in the
tarly church was too great, but the figures they conjecture, vary
318 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
considerably. The lowest estimate is found in an old duan
quoted by Keating, and is probably nearest the truth : —
Five and fifty learned bishops
The holy man ordained,
And three hundred approved praying men
On whom he conferi'ed orders.^
If we take this to mean the number of bishoprics estab-
lished, it seems to us to be a reasonable estimate. The names
of 42 bishops are given in the Tirechan text, and the writer adds
"and many more" (et alii quam plurimi). And the Four
Masters state ^1111 A.D.) that the Synod of Fiadh Mac Aengus
was attended by Kellach, the coarb of St. Patrick, and
Maelmure-ua-Dunain, noble Senior of Ireland (Keating calls
him Archbishop of Cashel) and 50 bishops.
There was, no doubt, a full attendance of bishops at the
Synod on this occasion. At the Synod of Rathbrasail the
existing dioceses were reduced in number to 12 bishops, and
the Primate for Leatt Chuinn, and 12 bishops, and the archbishop
of Cashel for Leath Mogha — 26 in all. To this number is
to be added the Bishop of Dublin, whom Keating does not
include, as at that time he received consecration from, and
owed obedience to, Canterbury, It is to be remarked that in
1096, Anselm, then Archbishop of Canterbury, erected a new
diocese by creating and consecrating a bishop for Waterford,
which was only 13 miles by 9 in extent, and was left untouched
in the new arrangement. This may be contrasted with the
extensive diocese of Connor, over which and Down St. Malachy
presided, visiting all the towns and districts of his spiritual king-
dom on foot, as St. Bernard tells us. In our judgment there was
no substantial alteration in the number or area of the dioceses
from the time they were first fully constituted.
According to the view we present it is not necessary to
open the question of chorepiscopi, or country bishops here. There
is no trace in our texts of the existence or suppression of the
order, as we may style them, if they ever existed in Erin.
There is no word in Gaelic distinctly applicable to them, as in
^ A CU13 te CA05A fjiuit e4rpo5
Uo oitfoniT) incAi'6
Um ctn ce-ouib ct^uc a|itiuit6
pojiiA c-rojtmui.-t; sjiai-6.
^Reeves' Voivn and Connor, 125.
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH, 319
the case of under kings (uf\piA(i) nor is there a special honour
price for them referred to,^
This brings us to the catalogue of the orders of the saints in
Ireland, or as Ussher has it, " the Catalogue of the Saints."
Ussher, who was the first to publish a text of it, makes it the
foundation of the latter part of his " Antiquities of the British
Churches." He had two texts before him, one of which may
date from before the time of Jocelyn. His second text must be
later than that time, as it refers to the vision of St. Patrick, des-
cribed by Jocelyn in c. 175. The paragraphs 1, 2, relating to the
first and second order were printed from Ussher by Colgan
(II. 276). There are two other texts, one is published by
Fleming in his Collectanea, and another, which follows
Fleming's text very closely, is found in the Codex Salmanticensis.
Both these texts refer to the vision described by Jocelyn, and
must therefore be of subsequent date. Ussher's text, with the
variants of Fleming, is published in Haddon and Stubbs, II.
292. For these and other reasons we shall give the text from
the Cordex Salmanticensis with our translation. Great weight
has been attached to this catalogue from the time of Ussher to
our own day. Reeves calls it a most ancient and valuable
authority. Lanigan, Todd, Olden, and last but not least. Arch-
bishop Healy, were impressed with its palmary importance.
We do not share these views; to speak our whole thought, we
do not consider it of any evidential value, and must there-
fore, to explain our views, examine it in some detail, after we
have given the translation and text. We shall give verbatim
the recension of the Bollandist Editors, who have recently
published a beautiful edition of the Codex at the request and
at the expense of the late Marquis of Bute.^
The Codex from which the Bollandist text was taken
was sent from Salamanca by Thomas Bryan, the Jesuit
Father who was the rector of the Irish CoUeo^e there about the
year 1620 or 1625, to a Jesuit Father who presented it to
Rosweyd, who first conceived the idea of publishing the Acta
* " Benterim tries to show that these rural bishops were real bishops. Airgusti
is of the same opinion. Tliomassin maizes two classes of chorepiscopi, of whom
one were real bishops and the other only had the title without consecration. As
late as the 5th century we meet with very many real chorepiscopi in the towua
and villages of Africa." — Hefele ii. 322.
^ Acta Sanctoram Hih'rmcEex codice Salmanticeiisi nunc primum integre edita
Optra Caroli de Smtdt et Jo^cpUi dc Backer, iS.J., 18jS.
320 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Sanctorum, and was then collecting documents for the cele-
brated Bollandist Bibliotheca. It is written in a hand of the
14th century, neatly but very inaccurately. There is nothino-
in the Codex, nor do the learned editors in the preface, from
which we have taken the few facts above mentioned, state any.
thing, about the authorship of the Catalogue.
The Codex contains the lives of about forty Irish Saints,
including the life of St. Malachy by St. Bernard. It also
includes the miracles of St. Laurence O'Toole, and a life of St.
Catherine of Alexandria. It was placed at the disposal of
Colgan by the BoUandists and used by him when writing his
Acta SS. Hihernice.
CATALOGUE OF THE ORDERS OF THE SAINTS.
" Here begins the catalogue of the Orders of the Saints
in Hibernia according to different periods : —
"[432—543]
" (1) The first Order of the Saints was in the time of Patrick,
and then all the bishops, 350 in number, were famous and holy
and full of the Holy Spirit, They were founders of churches,
worshipped one head, Christ, and followed one leader, Patrick.
They had one tonsure, one celebration of Mass, and celebrated
one Easter, namely, after the vernal equinox. And what
was excommunicated by one church all excommunicated. They
did not object to having women as house-keepers and com-
panions (mulierum administrationem et consortia non
respuebant), because founded on the rock, Christ, they did not
fear the wind of temptation. This Order of Saints lasted
through four reigns ; to wit, from the time of Laoghaire, the
son of Niall, who reigned thirty-seven years ; and Olioll,
styled Moll, who reigned thirty years ; and Lughaidh, who
reigned seven years ; and this Order of Saints lasted to the
very end of Tuathal Maelgarbh, and all remained throughout
holy bishops, and these tuere, for the most part, Franks and
Romans and Britons and ^i^cots hy hirth.^
" [543—599.]
" (2) The second Order of Saints was like this. In this
second Order now there wore few bishops and many priests,
^ Ussher has "Catholic" before Saints, and the length of the reigns is not
given. Fleming omits " Catholic," and has the regnant years, and gives the
number as 430. The words italicised are in Ussher, but are omitted in Fleming.
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH, 321
300 in number. They worshipped one liead, God, and had
different rituals (ritus) of celebration and different rules of
living, and celebrated one Easter ; to wit, the 14th of the moon.
And they made a uniform tonsure from ear to ear. They
shunned having women as companions and house-keepers
(consortia et administrationes fugiebant), and excluded them
from the monasteries. This Order lasted for four reigns also
(ad hue ?) ; to wit, from the end of Tuathal Maelgarbh and
through the thirty years in which Diarmaid Mac Cearbhael
reigned ; and through the time of the two grandsons of Mure-
dach, who reigned seven years ; and during the time of Aedh,
the son of Ainmire, who reigned thirty years. Those (saints)
received the ritual of celebrating Mass from holy men of
Britain ; to wit, from Saint David and Saint Gildas and Saint
(Ca) doc. And their names are these ; to wit, Finnian, Endeus,
Colman, Congal, Aedh, Kiaran, Columba, Brendan, Brechen,
Cainech, Caemgin, Laisrean, Laisre, Lugeus, Barrideus, and
many others, who were in the second grade of the saints.^
"[599—666.]
" (3) The third Order of Saints was like this. Now they
were holy priests and few bishops, 100 in number, who used to
dwell in desert places. They lived on vegetables and water
and on the alms of the faithful, and held all earthly things of
no account, and wholly shunned back-biting and slander.
These had different rules (of living) and different rituals of
celebration, and also different tonsures, for some had the
coronal tonsure and some the hair. And they had a different
Paschal solemnization, for some celebrated on the 14th and
others on the 13th moon. This Order lasted through four
reigns ; that is, through the time of Aedh Alair, (recte Slaine),
who reigned only three years ; and through the time of Domh-
nail, who reigned thirty years ; and through the times of the
sons of Maelcoba and (recte the sons of) Aedh Slaine. And the
Order lasted up till that great mortality (A.D. 6(j6). And their
names are — Petran, bishop ; Ultan, bishop ; Colman, bishop ;
Edan, bishop ; Lomnan, bishop ; Senach, bishop. These were
all bishops, and many more. And these now were the priests —
Fechan, priest ; Airendan, Failan, Commian, Ernan, Cronan,
and many other priests.
' The names are quite different in the three rescensious.
322 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
" (4) Note that the first Order was holiest, the second very
holy, the third holy. The first glows, like the sun, with the
heat of charity ; the second, like .the moon, sheds a pallid
light ; the third shines with the bright hues of the dawn.
" Taught by a revelation from on high, Patrick understood
that those three Orders (were signified) when he beheld in
that prophetic vision all Ireland filled with a fiery flame, then
the mountains alone aglow, and afterwards lamps gleaming in
the valleys. This is extracted from an old life of Patrick.**
" (5) Note these are the names of the disciples of St. Finnian
of Clonard ; to wit, two Kierans (Kieran the son of the
artificer and Kieran of Saighir) ; Colomba, the son of Crimthan
and Columkille ; two Brendans, that is Brendan the son of
Finlog and Brendan of Birr ; Mobhi Claireneach ; Lasrian, the
son of Nadfraech ; Sinell, the son of Maenach ; Cainnech, the
son of the grandson of Dalann and Ruadhan of Lorrha ; and
Nimidh (?) of the Red Hand ; Mugenoe of Cillcimel (?) ; and
Bishop Sinach."'
Incipit catalogus ordinum Sanctorum in Hybernia secundum
diversa teinpora : —
(1) Primus ordo sanctoiura erat in tempore Patricii. Et tuncerant
episcopi omnes clari et sancti et spiritu sancto pleni, cccl numero,
ecclesiaruui fandatores, unum caput Christum colentes et unum ducem
Patriciam sequentes unam tonsuram habentes, et unam celeb rationem
missae, et unum pascha scilicet, post equinoctium vernale celebrabant,
et quod excoramunicatum essetab una ecclesia omnes excommunicabant.
Mulierum administrationem et consortia non respuebant, quia super
petram Christi fundati ventum temptationis non timebant. Hie ordo,
sanctorum per quatuor duravit regna hoc est a tempore Leodhgarii filii,
Neyl qui regnavit xxx** vii. annis et Ayllelli cognomentoMolt qui
xxx** annis regnavit, et Lugdech qui vii annos regnavit. Et hie ordo
sanctorum usque ad tempora extrema Tuathal Meylgarb duravit.
Suncti episcopi omnes permanserent et hi pro magna parte erant
Franci et Bomani et Britones et Scoti genere.
(2) 2us vero ordo sanctorum talis erat. In hoc enim secundo ordine
pauci erant episcopi et multi presbiteri numero ccc'. Unum caput
^ One Ussherian text, instead of paragraph 4, has simply — "The first (Order)
glowed like the sun, the second like the moon, the third like the stars. Primus
sicut sol ardescit, secundus sicut luna, tertius sicut stellae."
^ The statement that the 2nd order had different masses, etc. , and introduced
a ritual from the British Church, we do not accept as probable or proven. The
history of the Paschal controversy and the tonsure shows, as we shall see in a
future chapter, that the Gael were obstinately conservative in such matters. The
liturgical aspect of the question, which is very important, we must leave to better
equipped critics to deal with. A very interesting tract on the various liturgies
will be found in Cardinal Moran's Essays, p. 242. See Healy's Insula Sanctorum
et doctorum, p. 201.
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH. 323
Deum colentes cliveraos celebrandi viLus habebant et diversas regulas
vivendi, et unuiu Pascha, scilicet xiiii* luna celebrabant. Et hi
uniformem tonsuram, scilicet ab aiire usque ad aurem, faciebant.
Mulierum quoque consortia ac administrationes fugiebant atque a
monasteriis suis eas excludebant. Hie ordo per quaterna adhuc regna
duravit, scilicet ab extremis Tuathal Maylgairb temporibus et per
triginta annos quibus Dcrraicius Mac Keirbaill regnavit et per tempus
quo duo nepotesMureadaytur qui vii annis regnaverunt et per
tempus quo Aed Mac Aynmerach qui xxx*^ annis regnavit. Hi rituni
celebrandi missam acceperunt a Sanctis viris de Britannia, scilicet a
sancto David et sancto Grilda et a saneto Doco. Et horum nomina sunt
hec scilicet Finnianus, Endeus, Colmanus, Congallus, Aedeus
Queranus, Columba, Brandanus, Brichinus, Caynecus, Caymginus,
Laysrianus, Laysrius, Lugeus, Barrideus, et alii multi qui erant de
secundo gradu sanctorum.
(3) 3us ordo sanctoram erat talis. Eraut enim illi presbiteri sancti
et pauci episcopi numero c, qui in locis disertis habitabant. Hi
oleribus et aqua et eleemosinis fidelium vivebant et omnia terrena
contempnebant et omnem susurrationem et detractionem penitus
evitabant. Hi diversas regulas et varios celebrandi ritus habebant et
diversam etiam tonsuram ; aliqui enim habebunt coronam, aliqui
cesariem. Et hii diversam solempnitatem Paschalem habebunt ;
alii enim xiiii'* a luna alii xiii^ celebrabant. Hie ordo per quatuar
regna duravit hoc est per tempus Edaallain, qui tribus annis tantum
regnavit et per tempus Domhnalli qui triginta annis regnavit et per
tempora filiorumu Moylcoba et per tempus Eda Slane et hie ordo usque
ad mortalitatem illam magnam perduravit. Quorum nomina sunt hec
Pertranua episcopus, Ultanus episcopus, Colmanus episcopus, Edanus
3piscopu3, Lompnanus episcopus, Senachus episcopus, Hii episcopi
Dmnes et alii plures Hii vero presbiteri : Fechinus, presbiter,
Ayrendanus, Faylanus, Commenianus, Colmanus, Ernanus, Cronanus
at alii presbiteri plures.
(4) Nota quod primus ordo erat sanctissimus, secundus sanctior,
tertius sanctus. Primus sicut sol in fervors caritatis calescit, 2u8 sicut
luna pallescit, 3us sicut aurora splendescit. Hos tres ordiues beatus
Patricius superno oraculo edoctus intellexit cum in visione ilia
prophetica vidit totam Hyberniam flamma ignis repletam deinde montes
tantum ardere, postea lucernas ardere in vallibus conspexit. Haec
extracta sunt de antiqua vita Patricii.
(5). Nota Hec sunt nomina discipulorum sancti Finneani Cluana
Hyrard videlicet duo Kyerani, Kyranus filius artificis et Kyeranus
Saigre, Columba filius Crimthainn et Columkyille, duo Brendani id est,
Breudanus filius Finloga, et Brendanus Birra, Mobhi Clarinetur, et
Lasrianus filius Naturfrec, et Synell filius Maenaci et Cainnecus
filius Nepotis Dalann, et Rudan Lothra, et Nannyd Lamderc, et
Mugenocur Killi Cumili et episcopus Senach.-^'^
The codex from which the foregoing was printed was
endorsed by the Bollandist editors
" Ada SS. Hib. ex. cod. Salm., p. 161.
324 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
"MS. SALMANTICENSE DE SS. HIBERNLE. ii"
A general view of the catalogue reveals some startling
statements. In the first paragraph we are asked to believe
that in the time of St. Patrick there were 350 or 450 bishops
and that all these bishops were saints. That there ever were
at any time in any country during the life of one man 350
bishops all saints, the clergy themselves would, we fancy, be the
last to credit. We do not lay much stress on the exaggerated
figure as to bishops, we regard it as merely a monastic way of
saying that the number was excessively large. A recent writer
(Sir J. Ramsey), suggests that all monastic estimates should be
divided by ten. The excessive multiplication of saints, however,
not only in this text but in many others, is more serious. It has
prejudiced the claims of the many real saints to official recog-
nition in Rome. Only two Gaelic Saints were ever canonized —
St. Malachy and St. Laurence O'Toole. A very limited number
in addition, principally the patron saints of dioceses, were
accorded a defined ecclesiastical position towards the end of
the last century. The principal reason for the omission was
the magnitude of the number and the looseness of the
evidence.^-
** Fleming has some valuable and interesting pages on this catalogue. He
states that about the year 1 626, the Rev. Francis Matthew, the Warden of their
college and lately Provincial, had got copies made of the lives of very many of the
Irish Saints from two MS. parchment volumes, one belonging to Armagh or
Dublin, and then in tlie library of Uasher, and the other belonging to the Island
of all the Saints (in L. Ree). Aa we understand him, Fleming found in the copy
codex several Lives, one of St. Patrick by "an old and trusty " writer, from which he
quotes verbatim a Catalogue of the Orders of the Saints, corresponding substan-
tially to paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Codex Salmanticencis. He does not give
or suggest the name of the "old and trusty" writer. He adds afterwards (432,
col. 2), a paragraph which corresponds substantially with the vision paragraph (5)
of the Codex Sahiianticencis. There is no authority for the statement made by Dr.
O'Connor that the catalogue was composed by Tirechan. There are no precise
data to fix an approximate date for its composition. If the " copy Codex " re-
ferred to by Fleming is in the archives of the Franciscan Convent in Dublin further
light may be thrown on the subject. The fact that the catalogue stops at 666 A.D.
is not of much weight, as the Collection of Lives in which it appeared may have
stopped at that time, and the writer certainly lived some centuries later, on the
most favourable view, and did not bring the precis up to his own time. Flemingius
P. Collectanea, 430. The catalogue is probably an expression of Jocelyn's vision.
^^ Francis Harold wrote a life of his uncle, Luke Wadding (1588-1667). It
is very interesting, written in good style and excellent Latin, worthy to rank with
the conferences of Cassian. He mentions that Wadding, then a man of powerful
influence at Rome, used it successfully, apparently with some difficulty, to obtain
permission for a special Antiphon verse and prayer for the Universal church in
lionor of St. Patrick on his feast at the Irish foundations in Rome and near it.
He then endeavoured to obtain a like privilege for the other two patrons of
Ireland, St. Columba and St. Bridget, but died before he had succeeded, and it
was not granted at that time. Vita Annales Minorum (ed. 1731), Vol. I., cxxii.
THE OKGANISATION OF THE CHURCfl. 325
At the end of the Life of Giraldus of Mayo, the Bollandists
after quoting from the Litany of Aengus, " The 330 saints,
with Gerald, bishop, and the 50 saints of Leyney, in Connact,
who dwelt in the monastery of Mayo, I invoke, through Christ,
&c.," add : — " The Irish would not have been so liberal in
aanonising in troops their dead, who had shown more than
ordinary virtue, if they had observed the practice of the
Universal Church, which conferred the honour only on martyrs.
But as to those who had not been known to have won the prize
of martyrdom, their lives were examined singly : their early,
middle, and closing years, and the miracles that accompanied
or followed ; and severally and singly, were added to the number
of those who may be ritually invoked, either by Pontifical
decree or by the common voice of a Christian people, induced
by evident and frequent miracles, to form a sure belief in the
' saintship ' of the individual." ^^ This rule the Irish in their
' pious simplicity ' did not observe, and the word ' saint '
in their authors should be held to be equivalent to ' of pious
memory,' of ' happy recollection,' or ' servant of God.'
This question of the Irish saints is so important that we
must pursue it further. We venture to suggest that the
inferences that have been drawn from the Litany of Aengus
should be reconsidered and modified. An examination of it in
connection with the Epilogue to the Feilire, the Ijtany of the
Blessed Virgin and the Scuap Chrabhaegh (Broom of Piety)
of Colcu, reveals, we think, that reference was made to these
troojJS for a special purpose, without any intention of claiming
for all the members of the troop the rank and veneration due
to saints of the Catholic Church. Colcu was Ferleighen,
probably professor of theology, at Clonmacnoise, the tutor and
friend of Alcuin, and died in 792 A.D. His litany or prayer is
divided into two parts. " The first consists of 28 petitions or
paragraphs, each beseeching the forgiveness and mercy of
Jesus, through the intercession of some class of the holy men
of the Old or New Testament." i^
Again Aengus, in the Epilogue to the Feilire, states that he
laid under contribution for the Feilire, " the vast tome of
Ambrose Hilary's pious sensus, Jerome's Antigraph, Euse-
« Boll, Ada, SS., xi., 288 (March 13).
" Colgan sayg of the .Sctiaij : " Est fasciculus ardentissimaruni precum per
modmn cjuodauiaiodu LiLaiiiarum."
326 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
bius' martyrology, and Erin's host of books." ** " Lest, how-
ever," writes Archbishop Healy, " any might be jealous for
being omitted, he invokes them in the third part (the epilogue)
under certain general heads, patriarchs, prophets, virgins,
martyrs, etc., so that not a single one of the heavenly orders,
at home or abroad, can complain of the want of some reference
to his or her memory." ^^ As regards the saints of the Old
Testament, it was a prominent teaching found, for instance, in
Callia, that the Lord, after the Passion, took up to heaven
a multitude of saints, who had been waiting for the redemp-
tion.
The script known as the Litany of Aengus has reached us,
in the Book of Leinster (1150 c), and in the Leahhar Breac.
It is imperfect in the latter and, as we think, also in the former.
It is contained in the " Isidore Leaves," which formed part of the
Book of Leinster, were missing from it, found in St. Isidore's,
Rome, and are now in the Franciscan Convent in Dublin.
They are printed in the facsimile pp. 355 of the Book of
Leinster .^"^
On examining the text of the Litany in the Book of Leinster
we find that it consists of groups of bishops, priests, pilgrims,
anchorites, monks, martyrs, innocent youths, Romans, Gauls,
Saxons, and Egyptians ; disciples with Manchan ; the twelve
men who went beyond the sea with Rive ; the descendants of
Corra, with their seven companions; the persons who went
with St, Patrick to Mount Armoin (?), etc., etc. ; and finally
the text ends with 141 groups of seven bishops each, each group
having a " place-name " (e.g., of Ardpatrick) attached to it,
meaning who were buried there. In the Ecclesiastical Record
text the writer places after the first and succeeding groups the
words of invocation, All these I invoke unto my aid through
Jesus Christ. The writer states he collated the text in the
Isidore Leaves, i.e., in the Book of Leinster, with the text in
the Leahhar Breac, and heads his translation, " From the
^* Stokes, Feilire, cxcii.
^^ Jnsida Sancfori/m, 4:11. The author gives his preference to the date 801
A.D, for Feilire. Stokes would have it a century or more later. But this view
rests mainly on linguistic forms, an insecure foundation, in our judgment, in a
period of transition from the Old to the Middle Gaelic.
" On the intricate and obscure subject of the texts, see Atkinson, Pref. to
the Book of Leinster.
The Leahhar Breac wants at the beginning ten or twelve groups of saints.
A text is given in the 3rd vol. (1867) of the Eccl. Record Ir,, pp. 385, 468,
witK a translation, to which we shall refer.
THE ORGANISATION OF THE CHURCH. 327
Book of Leinster." ^* This is inaccurate, and a very serious
inaccuracy. It is only at the ninth or tenth group in the
Book of Leinster that we find words of invocation or rather
letters representing words, viz., All these whose names are
written in Heaven ^^ I invoke to ray aid (hos omnes quorum
nomina scripta sunt in coelis invoco ad auxilium meum). This
was, we suggest, a short form for a longer form in the first part
of the Litany, which is now wanting, in which it was made
clear somehow, as by the words " per Christum " that it, was
their intercession that was asked for. If the Litany originally
commenced with the first group in the present text, we should
expect to find the full invocation there. And, further, in the
Book of Leinster we find the first nine or ten groups followed
by another series of groups, and these followed by the words
or letters jper Jesum only, which clearly refer to a complete
invocation not now found in the existing text. It is also very
persuasive proof that the text is imperfect in the Book of
Leinster, as well as in the Leabhar Breac, that no appeal is
made to the three patron saints of Erin, nor to the Finnians,
Brendans, Congall, Ciaran, Columbanus, etc. It seems to ns
incredible that all these great national saints should have been
omitted from such a Litany. We suggest that the groups
were preceded by an enumeration of the great saints singly,
and that the groups were added ex majori cautela, as they
were in the ^e^^i^'e, lest there should be any saints "whose
names were written in the Heavens " left unnoticed. It is
quite possible that Ward found something of the sort in the
texts before him. His observations point, we think, to an
enumeration of names singly. An invocation after each group
without names would not assist him in making a list of saints
of the same name and surname., which was the object he had in
view. He writes : —
When I had almost finished making a list of the saints of the same
name and surname . . . there came from the brethren in the
Convent in Donegal in Ireland a manuscript copy of a codex, the parch-
ment and writiog of which were so eaten away (and obliterated) by
time that in places it could not be read, and betokened an age of at
" The heading of the Caelio text on the opposite page is, we are surprised to
find, " SlechtLeabliar AedhaMoio Crimthain inso sis — An extract fri.ni the i^oo/t
of Aedh Mac Crimt/iiun down Iiere," which explains a good deal. This ie not the
Booi- of Leinster text. Ecc. Rec, 1869, p. 300.
'* This would exclude the meiabere of the group whose names were not writtsa
in Heaven.
328 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
least 700 years, which was confirmed by the fact that the author
omitted the saints of that age, though they would have answered his
purpose as well as those more ancient whom he enumerates as often,
repeating these words in Latin — quorum noviina scrijjta in ccelis hos
omnes invoco adauxilium meum, i.e., " whose names have been written in
Heaven, all those I invoke to aid me Z'^"
Regarding the Consortia Mulierum, the Rev. Mr. Olden
takes a very different view of the meaning of this sentence
from ours. Consortium, he thinks, is not equivalent to societas,
but has a technical meaning " signifying the association of a
woman vowed to perpetual chastity with an ecclesiastic, both
occupying the same house and living together as brother and
sister." In the Eastern church, he says: "Such unions were
known as awehaKTai ayairr)rai and ah\(fiui in the West as consortes
(hence consortium) mulieres subintroductae and perhaps
more generally as sorores. . . The Council of Nicaea passed
a canon aeainst consortium.*'^'^
The Srd canon of the Council of Nicaea (325) forbade any
bishop or other cleric to have in his house a avytiaai^TOQ
(subintroducta) that is any woman living in the house with
him, unless his mother, sister, aunt, or such other person as was
free from all suspicion. Hefele observes on this canon "In
the first ages of the church some Christians, clergymen and
laymen, contracted a sort of spiritual marriage with unmarried
persons so that they lived together, but there was not a sexual
but a spiritual connection between them for their mutual
spiritual advancement. They were known by the name oi
ovreiadKTOL ayQTTTjTai and sorores. That which began in the
spirit, however, in many cases ended in the flesh, on
which account the church very stringently forbade such unions,
even with penalties more severe than those with which she
punished concubinage, for it happened that Christians who
would have recoiled from concubinage, formed one of those
^^ As Ward's book is ver}' rare, we quote a short extract : — Drnn in obstii-
pendahac multitudine sanctorum ejusdeni nominis coguouiinis etc., colligeiidi ver-
sarer pene actum, agere videbarubi exemplar cujusdam Msi. Codicis a Dungallensis
Moiiastarii fratribus in Hibernia superveuit vetustate itacorosaeiiam cum charac-
teribus membranea ut alicubi legi nequiverit, et septem saltern sa3culorum anti-
quitatem praeferat si prsesertim consideremus authorem omisisse sanctos hujm
isetatis quanquam ad institutum ejus aequo facerent atque antiquiores qiios recensuit
et toties repetitis his verbis Latinis " quorum nomiiia scripta sunt iu cadis lioa
omnes invoco ad auxilium meum." H. Ward (Vardeus) ^cto <S. Eumholdi,2(ii.
Colgan refers to the Litany, Acta SS. I,. 581.
"Proc. %. Ir. Acad. (1893) vol. III. 3<» Ser. p. 4-15 on the Cuasortia
1st Order of the Irish Saints.
THE ORQANISATIOiV OF THE CHURCH. 329
spiritual unions, and in doing so, foll.''-^ We are not aware of
any text in which consors simply, i.e., without a context, is
used as equivalent to soror or consortia simply used to
designate these spiritual unions.
The case of bishop Mel of Ardagh which he cites, appears to
us to be decisive against the Rev. Mr. Olden's views. The
bishop and his (siur) his kinswoman, or, as Mr. Olden suggests,
his spiritual sister, " used to be in one habitation praying
to the Lord." Scandal was given by this, which rumour carried
to the ears of Saint Patrick. He went, forthwith, to Ardagh,
and inquired into the matter. " Then Patrick knew that there
was no sin between them, but said : ' Let men and women be
apart so that we may be found not to give opportunity to the
weak, and so that by us the Lord's name be not blasphemed,
which be far from us.* And thus he left them with Brith Leith
between them ; she in Druim Chea to the west of Bri Leith
and he to the east of it in Ard Acha (Ardagh).-^'* We do not
think a spiritual union is referred to here, but if the relation
was such, it was promptly stamped out by the Saint. Surely
it is not conceivable that 350 saints, or any number of them,
should be living openly in contumacious defiance of the canons
and anathemas of an CEecumenical council.
22 Hefele Councils (Clark) vol. I. 380.
23 Trip. Ufe. 91.
[ 330 ]
CHAPTER XXIII.
THE MONKS.l
7i/T0NAGHUS, Solitarius, Monk, signified originally a
man who lived by himself, alone, solitary, retired from
the world (avaxwp^rj/e), a dweller in the desert, a hermit
(Ip^/i/r^c). When the monks or solitaries, of whom the most
celebrated was Paulus in Egypt, were trained in the ways of a
common life, under an abbot, by St. Antony (264-356), the
essential principles of monasticism, as it afterwards came to be
known in the West, were solidly established. Sexual solitari-
ness was secured by the vow of chastity, which, as understood,
excluded the marriage tie. Living under the rule of an abbot
implied the vow of obedience, which involved the renunciation
of the individual will in all things not contrary to God's law.
One would have expected when the monasteries multiplied
and the monks came to be reckoned by thousands in Egypt,
that a rule would be drawn up, not only for ordering the
internal discipline in each monastery, but also for the common
government and control of all collectively. But St. Antony
refused to write a rule for his disciples ; he said that the
precepts of the Gospel were sufficient. Macarius (394) how-
ever is regarded by some as the author of the rule which bears
his name. When he went into the Nitrian region, the mountain
on its western extremity was tilled with solitaries, and grouped
^ This chapter deals only with cenobite monks and with the reoognised rules
and "use" of community life. The special austerities of individuals, whether
recluses, incluses (we believe there were none in Erin), or cenobites, do not come
within the scope of this chapter. Compared with what we may call hermit life in
France and Italy, they present no feature of exceptional severity. We give a few
dates here for the founding of the following monasteries, which are at least approxi-
mately correct : —
A.D. 270, The Thebaid, St. Anthony ... 250-356
320, Tabeuisi (Tabenna), St. Pachomius, 285-.345
36.3, Metaza Pontus, St. Basil, 329 ... 329-379
374, Marmoutier, near Tours, St. Martin, 316-337
410, Lerins (S. Honorat), St. Honoratus, + 429
410 (c), St. Victor,near Marseilles, Cas.sian, 360-456
490, Aries Monastery at, St. Caesariuss ... 468-542
529. Monte Cassino, St. Benedict .. 480-543
563, lona, St. Coluinba, ... .. 524-597
596, Luxcuil, St. Columbanus .. 540-613
THE MONKS. 331
around him in the eastern part of the district of the Natron
lakes (in which was in after time the famous city of Sceta,
about 43 miles west of Cairo), arose thousands of cells of
solitaries whose lives were devoted to labour and prayer and
fasting and vigils. They slept, ate, and worked alone, but met
at stated times for prayer. They fasted not only from food,
but what was still more trying, from sleep. Herbs and roots,
salt and water, supplied the necessaries of life. A little bread
constituted a feast. Their labour was well organised and
almost incessant. They wove mats from the reeds which grew
in the district, and procured by the sale of them all that they
required. They were not bound to this common life, if it can
be called such, and they frequently passed into the hermit life,
which was considered holier. Up to this time there were
collections of so-called rules,^ which contained valuable precepts,
but there was no body of rules purporting to be a code or
constitution for monastic government. It was not till the
time of Pachomius (292-348) that community life proper —
what is now known as monastic life — began. Pachomius was
at first a soldier in the Roman army. After his conversion he
otFered himself as a disciple to Palemon, who had been a disciple
of St. Antony. Palemon at first refused to receive him. " My
food," said he, " is bread and salt ; I abstain from wine alto-
gether ; I watch half, sometimes the whole night, praying and
reading the Divine Word." Pachomius said he was prepared
for this, and Palemon then consecrated him to God, with the
monk's habit (habitw vionacJd eum consecravit), and laid upon
him the injunction " to labour and to watch " (labora et vigila).
Later on Pachomius founded the celebrated monastery of
Tabenna, or Tabenisi (the Palms of Isis),^ on an island in the
Nile. His rule, known as the Angel's rule,* is given in the
22 ad chapter of the Life of Pachomius, by an unknown author,
' Collected in Migne, vol. 100,
'Tabenna is an island near Kench and Denderah, 414 miles by river, south of
Cairo, and 40 north of Luxor, or Thebes. The territory of Thebes, the Thebaid,
normally extended from Hermopolis JMagna, 180 miles south of Cairo, to Syeiie
(Assouam), 590 miles from Cairo. This Thebais Palladius divides into Upper
Thebais, from Syene (Assouam) to Lycopolis (Aasiont) and Lower Thebais, from
Assiont to Cairo. Later writers commonly adopt this division. Lower Egypt
extended, according to this division, from Cairo (the Pyramids) to the sea. From
Syene to the sea is 520 miles.
* Legend said that an angel first brought it, written on bronze tablets. This
must be taken as an oriental way of saying that it was divinely inspired. Miune.
vol.28, p. 59. J f to ,
332 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
supposed to be a contemporary, and was translated into Latin
by Dionysius Exiguus. It runs (in part) as follows : —
You shall permit each to eat and drink according to his strength,
and compel him to labour in proportion to what he eats, and shall not
prevent any from eating in moderation or from fasting (i.e., at his
choice). You shall impose heavier work on the strongest and those
that eat; lighter on those that are weaker and fast. Lot each be
clothed at night with a linen tunic, girdled. You shall make separate
cells and ordain that three shall remain in each cell. Let each have a
melotes (i.e., a white dressed goat-skin), without which let him neither
eat nor sleep. However, when approaching the Sacraments of Christ,
let him undo his girdle and lay aside his melotes, and wear only his
cowl (cucidla).
Then came a command as to distributing the monks. He
divided the brethren into regiments, numbered with the letters
of the alphabet, " i," the simplest, representing the untrained,
and " ^," the most complicated, representing the most forward
and disciplined.
They should remain permanently (jugiter) in the monastery
and labour with their hands for three years before entering on
more sacred studies. Each when eating should cover his
head, not look at his neighbours, and keep silence. He was to
say twelve prayers in the day, twelve in the evening, and
twelve at night. Additional prayers might be said in the cells
by the more perfect. This rule, as it was afterwards completed
by Theodoras and Orsisius, St. Jerome translated into Latin from
a Greek version, in 401 A.D., prefixing a short but very interest-
ing preface. There were then numerous monasteries in the
deserts of the Thebaid. Each monastery consisted of thirty or
forty houses {domiis) under an overseer (praepositus) ; each
house consisted of thirty or forty brethren, and three hundred
and four houses made a tribe (tribus). The brethren of the same
craft occupied the same house. Thus, the linen-weavers, the
mat- weavers, the tailors, carpenters, fullers, sandal-makers, were
governed separately, each by an overseer. Accounts of the work
done were rendered weekly to the " Father " of the monastery.
These accounts and the accounts of the sales of the articles
made in each monastery were submitted for audit to the high
steward {oeconomus) of all the monasteries once a year. .
Two general assemblies were held every j-ear in August and
at Easter, at which all the brethren not absolutely required at
the monasteries attended — to the number, St. Jerome Sfiys, of
THE MONKS. 333
50,000. This seems almost incredible. After Pachomius removed
his residence from Tabenisi to the more central monastery at
Peboou, tho meetings took place there. He remained superior-
general of all the monasteries till his death, before which he
designated his successor, who designated his successor in like
manner.^ And so Schnoodi in the following century designated
or appointed Visa to succeed him. The superior-general
appointed the heads of the daughter houses, and changed them
about at his discretion ; was in fact a spiritual autocrat. To
anticipate a little, we may mention here that Columba
named or designated Baethin as his successor, and the
superiors of the affiliated monasteries received their charge
from him. The succeeding abbots of lona — it is not clear
whether they were designated or elected — were confined to
St. Columba's kindred until the 11th abbot.*^
Cassian bears the following testimony as to the discipline
he observed at Tabenna : — " The monastery of the monks of
Tabenna in the Thebaid is better fitted as regards numbers, as
it is more strict in the rigour of its system than all others,
for there are in it more than 5,000 brethren under the rule of
one abbot ; and the obedience with which the whole number
of monks is at all times subject to one elder, is what no one
among us would render to another even for a short time or
demand from him.""
Before leaving the Egyptian monasteries a further remark
may be appropriate. There are those who regard their
strenuous asceticism and that of the kindred Gaelic institutions
as useless or bordering on insanity. They do not reflect that,
as in the case of bodily infirmities, the physic that cures one
generation will not in many cases cure the next, and will be
displaced by a drug suited to altered conditions of life, so in
the spiritual order spiritual remedies must be varied from age
to age. We deem it fitting to quote, for the enlightenment of
these critics, the following testimony of Sozomen, a Greek
lawyer who wrote in the first half of the 5th century : —
" The monasteries of Egypt were governed by several individuals of
' Migne, vol. 23, p. 64. The above is the view of Amilineau E., who has studied
the Greek, Latin, and Coptic writers on this subject. There is practically no
difference of opinions anaong them. — Dt Historia Lausiaca, p. 14.
P. Ladenze, Le Cenobitisme Falchomien, 286.
* Afterwards the abbot is said to have been elected of the men " of Alba and
Erin " when Hy lost its supremacy. This is very vague. — Reeves' Adamnun, p. 364.
334 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
eminent sanctity, who were strenuously opposed to the heresy of Arius.
The people who were neither willing nor competent to enter into the
doctrinal questions, received their opinions from them, and thought
with them, for they were persuaded that men whose virtue was
manifested by their deeds were in possession of the truth." *
The monasticiem of the Gael played such an important
part, not only in the history of Erin but in the evangelisation
and secular civilisation of Europe that, we think, a somewhat
lengthy examination of its constitution and scope will not be
out of place here, in what is primarily a secular history. And
in the first place let us say something about monastic rules
before comparing them with the Gaelic usages.
To regulate the lives of the thousands who embraced the
cenobitical life in Egypt there must have been a very efficient
organization. The government of 5,000 monks in a single
monastery must have been a very difficult matter, and it was
probably a still more difficult task to enforce due subordination
and obedience in daughter houses. Yet we hear nothing of
mutiny or revolt. The rules and regulations by which this end
was attained, if they were reduced to writing before the time
of Pachbmius, have not reached us.
The customs of Cluny were in use for a long time before
they were reduced to a kind of code, about 1009, by the
" religious " in Farfa. The monks at Cluny, practising them
day by day, felt no need to form them into a supplementary
written rule, and they were preserved solely by tradition. No
complete or authoritative redaction of the customs is of earlier
date than 1085, when Udalric wrote the Antiquiores Consue--
tudines Cluniacenses for the Monastery of Hirschau in Wur-
temburg, printed in Achery's Spicilegium I. 641, Constitii-
tiones Monasticoe.
In an adequate and comprehensive rule we should expect to
find regulations dealing (1) with internal or spiritual discip-
line ; (2) with external conduct ; (3) providing a constitution
for the government of each monastery separately; and (4)
providing for the government of a large number of houses in
obedience to the same rule in their relation to a chief monastery
and to each other.
The first requirement was in early times the most important.
A chapter of the rule was read in chapter every morning. This
8 Eccl. Hist. VI. 20, vol. ii,, p. 357, Libr. Nicene Fathers.
THE MONKS. 335
would supplement the merits or supply, in some measure, the
deficiencies of the abbot. There was not, however, we may
observe, much danger that without written matter there would
be any shortcomings in homiletic exposition amongst the per-
fervid Gael. St. Basil's rule^ was, in this view, the earliest, and
it remains still unrivalled foi* richness, variety, and culture.
The son of an advocate and rhetor, Basil made his higher studies
in philosophy, law, and literature at Athens, where he had
as school-fellows Gregory Nazianzen and Julian the Apostate.
After practising as advocate for some time at Csesarea he turned
his thoughts to monasticism at the instance of his sister
Macrina, who had devoted herself to the religious life. He
repaired to Egypt and studied the ascetic life there as well as
in Palestine and elsewhere, and returning to Csesarea, retired
to a solitude in Pontus on the river Iris, where his father had
an estate. Here he established in due course a monastery,
and afterwards (370) became Bishop of Caesarea. It is to his
many-sided training and experience that the excellence of his
rule in the respect we have mentioned must be mainly attri-
buted. The rule is written in good Greek, and has reached us
in a long and a short form.^** It is by way of question and
answer, the answer being generally a short lecture or discourse
on various topics of spiritual interest admirably suited for
reading in chapter. It formed, as it were, a little code of
spiritual discipline. We find nothing to correspond to this in
the Gaelic Church. What is called the rule of St. Columba
does not purport, on the face of it, to be a rule or to be by St.
Columba. It consists merely of a few short maxims intended
apparently for a hermit, and described by Colgan as Regula
Eremitica. It is most unfair to describe, as is sometimes
done, this little collection as the rule of St. Columba or (as is
• The amra (eulogy) of Columba, 690 A.D. (c.) has the following -. —
He used Basil's judgments.
He made known books of law as Cassian loved.
Sloinnpuf tei5 tebjiu Libuitt wc c&\i CAff lAti.
—Sev. Celt. XX. 181, 256.
The amra is a complete piece of artificial alliterative prose. It consists of a
prefatory prayer to God and forty paragraphs divided into ten chapters. It deala
(1) with the sorrow of the Gael for his death ; (2) his asaent to heaven ; (3) his
place in heaven; (4) his sufferings, and the devil's hatred of him ; ,5) his wisdom
and gentleness ; (6) his charity and abstinence ; (7) his knowledge and foresight ;
(8) King Aed's commission to the author ; (9) the special grief ot the tJi TieiL (hia
clansmen) ; (10) the virtues of the Am|iA Coloimb Citte.— Stokes, Rev. Celt. xx.l2.
^* Migne, Series (Jroica. xxxi. 306.
336 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
more frequently done without describing it accurately), com-
pare it with the rule of St. Basil or St. Benedict, and then
point out triumphantly how inferior was the rule of St.
Columba. The following are samples from it : —
Be alone in a separate place near a chief city if thy conscience is
not prepared to live in common with the crowd, i.e, community.
Let a fast place with one door enclose thee.
A mind prepared for red martyrdom.
A mind fortified and steadfast for white martyrdom, i.e., mortifica-
tion.
Take not of food till thou art hungry.
Sleep not till thou feelest desire.
Three labours in the day — prayer, work, and reading.
The measure of prayer shall be until tears come, and the measure of
thy work till tears come or until the perspiration come if thy tears are
not free.
It is absurd to call this a rule of St. Columba, with Adam-
nan's Life before us.'^
As regards the external conduct of the monks there are in
the rules of St. Basil many excellent directions and maxims of
spiritual prudence, but the arrangement is unmethodical.
From this point of view St. Benedict's rule is better arranged,
and more practical, but its directive and coercive power is
dangerously weakened by leaving so many important points
subject to unlimited variation at the discretion and dispensation
of the abbot. Both rules alike are animated with the same
spirit of fatherly care and tenderness for the monks. On one
point, however, there is a very remarkable difference between
them, all the more remarkable in that St. Benedict was well
acquainted with and admired the rule of St. Basil.
The rule of St. Basil prescribes a period of searching proba-
tion, the length of which is not mentioned. It was to vary
according to the circumstances of each particular case, and the
admission of the postulant was to be discretionary. On profes-
sion he made, as we understand the rule, a written declaration
of vows. This seems implied in certain words in relation to a
person who has rescinded his profession : " He should be
" For rule, Gaelic and Eng., see Reeves' Acts of Colton, Arcb. 109. The
entire rule, Gaelic and Eng., occupies only two and a half pages.
A Life of St. Kieran, quoted by Colgan, recites the names of several compilers
of rules in these words : — Numerantur octo inter prsecipuos Regularum conditores,
quibus monasteria prope innumera Regni Hiberniae regebantur prima enim regula
fuit S. Patricii ; secunda, S. Brigidse ; tertia, S. Brendani ; quarta, S. Kierani ;
quinta, S, Columbse ; sexta, S. Comgalli ; septima, Molassii ; octava, S. Adamnani
LTriai. Th. 471.)
THE MONKS. S37
regarded as an offender aj^ainst God, before whom and with
whom he has deposited the profession of his promises."^^
This, we make no doubt, contained vows of obedience, stability,
chastity, and individual poverty.
As regards children St. Basil (anoKpime) answers that
they are to be received from the earliest years, if they are
orphans, at the pleasure of the brotherhood ; if the parents
are alive, when brought by the parents the children were to be
received in the presence of several witnesses, so as to afford no
pretext for calumny. They were not, however, then to be
received in the body of the brotherhood, or reckoned as of thera^
lest from their falling away (a7rorux'«e) disgrace should be
brought on the religious life. They were to be brought up in
all piety as the common children of the brotherhood,
whether male or female, with separate board and in separate
houses, apart from the community except at prayer, under the
control of an aged brother, who was to rule with mildness and
paternal tenderness. Their education was to be attended to,
" and when the reasoning faculty is developed and the judgment,
it is fitting to administer the vow (6po\6yiav) of virginity now
secure and the result of their own judgment and discretion,
with the full development of the reason in the presence of the
prefects of the church. In this way no imputation will be cast
on the brotherhood for too great haste ; and if after making
vow to God any should be eager to cast it off, no loop-hole will
be left to him for lying."
"And any one who does not wish to take the vow of
virginity as not being able to have a care for the things of the
Lord, in the presence of the same witnesses let him be let free.
But when one after much searching of heart and deliberation,
which he ought to be permitted to make privately for the space
of very many days, lest anything should appear to be done by a
snatch, has made his vow, let him be received and enrolled
amongst thy brethren."
The rule and usage of St. Benedict provided in the case of
adults that after a novitiate of a year or so, when the novice
desired to be fully received into the brotherhood, he should,
amongst other things, prepare a written promise (pctitionem)
E(p 6v Kai etc ov -qv vpoXoyinv ra>v (rvi'grjt:C)i> Kmrtdero coram quo etin
quo pactorura confessionem deposuit. Interrogatio 14, Migne vol. 31, p. 9j0
Series Qraeca,
888 EARLr IRISH HISTORY.
to wit : " I promise to God and His saints, stability (i.e.,
perseverance), conversion of life and obedience," and should
lay this promise on the altar before the clothing of his head.
In the case of an infant {i.e. under 14) the father if alive,
or the mother, prepared and signed the petition, to wit : " I
promise for my son before God and His saints, stability, conver-
sion of life and obedience." Then on the appointed day after
the gospel of the mass and before the offertory, he placed in
the right hand of the child or boy, an unconsecrated host in a
cloth (oblatum cum nnappida), and a cruet of wine in his left
band, and then holding the boy before him folded his hand in
the cloth.13 Then he held the hand of the boy folded in the
cloth in his own hand and also the written promise, by which
he fixed him firmly in the monastery. Witnesses were present.
Then the abbot asked : " What seek you, brother ? " The father
answered, "I wish to deliver my son to Almighty God to serve
Him in this monastery, for so in the law the Lord commanded
the children of Israel that they should make offering of their
sons to God, and therefore 1 wish in like manner to make
offering of my son." Then the abbot asked the witnesses : " Do
you see, brothers, and hear what he says ? " They answered,
" We see and hear." Then the father led the boy to the place
where men are used to present their offerings, and the priest
took the host and the wine from the hand of the boy held in
the hand of the father, and the abbot took delivery of the boy
and the promise, and then handed the promise back to the
father, who placed it on the altar. And, if possible, it waa
desirable that the abbot phould then celebrate the Mass and
receive the host and wine himself when consecrated.^4
This interesting ceremony bound the boy for life as much as
if he had been an adult. He was a professed monk by dedica.
tion, and the exercise of the formidable " patria protestas "»S of
the Roman law. There was no such practice known to Irish
monasticism, which appears, so far as we can judge, to have
conformed to the usage of St. Basil.
'^The cloth (jmlla altaris) was probably a cloth not actually a corporal conse-
crated, but a cloth fashioned like a corporal. It was possibly used for the tirst
time after the oblation.
" Promitto ego ille (sic) coram Deo et Sanctis ejus pro filio meo de stabilitate
sua et couversione moruin suorum atque obedientiam habendam.
Hildemarus Monachus O. S. B. Tractatua in refjulam S. Benedicti. — Ed.
Mittermueller 0. S. B. 1880, p. 54S.
" See Menardus Cuncordia Begxdarum.
THE MONKS. 3[]9
Both St. Basil and St. Benedict inculcate the necessity for
manual labour, and St. Basil takes great pains to point oat
that prayer is not to be made a pretext for avoiding it. St.
Benedict allots, it has been calculated, an average of seven
hours daily for it. St. Basil mentions many trades, such as
weaving, carpentry, etc., but gives his preference to agriculture.
It is noteworthy that there is no vow of celibacy (which was
included in the vow of castitas) expressly mentioned in
either, though it was, no doubt, understood to be impliedly
contained in both. In af tertime, on making petition to receive
the lay habit in the Order of St. Benedict, the conversiis
promised castitas and stabilitas. But the old form was still re-
tained for the monks themselves, limiting the vow to stability,
conversion of life, and obedience. We do not find any lay
brothers, i.e., conversi, associated with the Gaelic monks, nor
were they seemingly contemplated by the rule of St. Bene-
dict.^^ The reason of the omission of the vow of castitas and
of regulations concerning the government of subordinate or
daughter-houses in the rules of St. Basil and St. Benedict may
probably be looked for in legal difficulties. A body of laymen,
united under articles of association binding them to celibacy,
would undoubtedly be contrary to the policy of the Roman
State after the passing of the Julian laws. And though the
severity of this legislation was relaxed by Constantine, such
an association would, we fancy, still be illegal ; and the
Arian emperors who succeeded him, and found their stoutest
and most formidable adversaries in the monks, would pro-
bably have fulminated edicts against such associations. In
like manner a network of religious houses spread through
the empire, or any considerable portion of it, controlled from
a central authority — an imperium within an empire — would
certainly not have been tolerated by the Imperial govern-
ment, whichitself made regulations concerning the monasteries.
In 535 Justinian enacted that when a vacancy occurred in an
abbey, the bishop of the place should select from amongst the
monks the person he thought fittest, and appoint him abbot.
This law was soon repealed. In 546 he enacted that the abbot
" We find the 1 vv brothers' vow to run : — " I byhote stedvestnesse and chaste
lyf tofore God, and alle Hies kaloweu and that ich schel ben buhsam {i.e., obedient)
and leven withoute propurtie al mi lif time." — Cons-uetudines Mons- S. August,
i'anttiar, p. 266 and 278. The MS. is probably of the date of the 13th century.
The mijuk's vow ia only given in Latin and French.
340 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
should be elected by all the monks or by those of the " fairest
repute or judgment" (cdXXtovoc idtoXiji/zIwc, translated melioris
opinionis), who should previously make oath before the Holy
Gospels to vote for the best man without favour and not through
friendship.^^ The alternative in this law is very curious. Who
was to decide if the minority was of fairer repute or sounder
judgment than the majority ? Was it the emperor ? It does
not mean, in its plain sense, that the general body of the
monks should elect a committee of selection, as was sometimes
done in after time. The rule of St. Benedict (516 c), which may
have been modified to comply with this law, provides that
he be made abbot whom all the brethren unanimously in the
fear of God, or even a part, however small, of the brethren of
sounder judgment shall elect.^* We have seen how the monks
at Glastonbury obtained permission to elect their abbot under
this rule. Previously, we presume, the Gaelic use prevailed,
and the abbot was selected by the abbot of the parent house.
By a sjmodical decree made at the Lateran under Gregory the
Great in 601 it was provided that on the death of an abbot
no stranger should be elected if a fitting person was to be
found amongst the brethren. There appears to be something
wanting in the text, which runs : — " Whom if by their own
free will the unanimous society of the brethren and who
shall have been elected without fraud or bribery, let him be
'ordained ' {i.e., as abbot)." It is probably the " alternative "
clause in the Imperial Edict that is wanting.^^ Monasticism had
enemies at a very early period, and when Arianism was powerful
and in the ascendant this hostility led to persecution. Valens in
373 issued an edict directing that the monks should be dragged
from their retreats and compelled to do their duties as citizens
and soldiers.2'^ St. Chrysostom (3i7-407) gives details as to
" Novell, c. 9. Ed. Schoell, p. 34 (A.D. 535). Novell, CXIII. c. 34 Ed. Schoell,
p. 618 (A.D. 546).
^* In abbatis ordinatione ilia semper consideratur ratio ut hie constituatur
quem sibi omiiis coiicors congrega,tio secundum timorem Dei, sive etiam para
quamvis parva congregationis saniori consilio elegerit, c. 64.
^^ Defuncto autem abbate cujusque congregationis non eztraneus eligatur nisi
de eadem congregatione quem si propria voluntate concors fratrum societaa, et
qui electus fuerit sine dolo nee veualitate aliqua ordinatur. — Mansi, X. 487.
^ The edict runs : — " Since manj', through lives of idleness, shirk their public
duties and betake themselves to solitary and secret places, and under pretext of
religion attach themselves to communities of monks ; these, and such like, found
in Eg3'pt, we command, by formal edict from our Coui't of the East, to drag
from their hiding places and recall to the discharge of public duties, or, according
to the tenor of our decree, deprive them of the enjoyment of their property, which
THE MONKS. 841
this persecution, and denounces the men " who make war " on
those who adopt the monastic life. He was only eighteen
years younger than Basil the Great, and had been a monk
for six years himself. There was no persecution of the monks
in Erin.
As regards food, St. Basil prescribes great moderation, the
use only of what was necessary to sustain life. " The common
cheap food of the country with a little oil." " When they have
finished their daily work," said St. Chrysostom, " they seat
themselves at table, and truly they have not many dishes.
Some only eat bread and salt, others take oil besides. The
weaker add herbs and vegetables. Having closed their meal
with hymns, they lay themselves down on straw."^^
The Rule of St. Benedict, which is too well known to require
a detailed examination here, was a little more liberal. Though
it forbade the use of the flesh of quadrupeds it allowed the
use of a reasonable quantity of wine, and seemingly of the
flesh of poultry, which is not, at any rate, expressly prohibited.
Milk probably would cost more than common wine, and not be
at all times procurable.
St. Cgesarius of Aries, born in 476, made his studies at
Lerins — " the nursery of bishops." From it went bishops to
Armagh and Belgium, to Aries, Lyons, Vienna, Avignon, Venice,
Troyes,and other places. From it also came Vincentius, Salvianup,
Faustus, and Eucherius. After filling the office of cellarer or
steward at Lerins, Cassarius became the abbot or prior of a
suburban monastery near Aries, which he reformed, under a
code of rules drawn up by himself. These, no doubt, were the
*' uses " of Lerins ; the same in substance as those which were
brought to Erin in the time of our apostle. His biographer
and soul-friend, Cyprianus, tells us he never changed from the
rules of Lerins — Nunquam, Lerinensiuin fratrum instituta
reliquit. The rule was written or dictated by him to his
nephew, Tetradius, as well as a rule for nuns, believed to be
the oldest,^'^ during his abbacy, which he held for three years
we have adjudged should be claimed by those who were liable for the discharge
of public duties." As the monks had no individual property, the law appears to
have been interpreted so as to capture all, and they were forced into the Imperial
armies.— Cod. Theodos. LXII. Tit. I. reg. 63.
^^ Horn, on Ep. I. to Timothy.
^ Rule 12 for Nuns. — Let every nun learn to read, and at all times have free-
dom for reading for two hours, from morning till the '2ud hour, i.e., 8 o'clock —
Migne, vol. 67, p. 1,106.
342 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
before he became bishop of Aries in 502. Besides poverty and
obedience, the rule prescribes stability, i.e., perseverance till
death, and that the monk shall at all times read till the 3rd
hour, i.e., 9 o'clock, and then do the other work he was ordered
to do. Wednesdays and Fridays were to be fast days in ordinary
weeks, and the other times of fasting the same as in Erin. No
fowl or flesh was to be eaten except by the sick. The rule
contains only 26 paragraphs.
In Erin there was no undue austerity as regards food, as we
shall now proceed to show. The so-called rule of St. Columba
says nothing on the subject, but we have authentic informa-
tion in Adamnan.
The ascetical writings of Columbanus are : —
1. The Regula Monastica, which is found in MS3. of Bobbio and
St. Gall.
2. Regula Genobialis, which is not found in these codices, but in a
codex of Augsburg and another of Ochenhausen.
3. The Penitential : De penetentiarum mensura taxanda liber.
4. Sermons — Instructions, short homilies, 1 7 in number, admirably
suited for reading in Chapter, as part of the spiritual discipline.
The authorship of the Fenitentials is disputed. They deal
largely with the number of percussiones to be administered,
which may mean anything from a soft slap to a stroke with a
cat-o'-nine-tails. Some such discipline was necessary for boy
monks, according to the ideas of the time, and though a
number is mentioned, this was, no doubt, reducible at the
discretion of the abbot or prior. At lona the penance was, we
infer, in the discretion of Columba. Adamnan makes no men-
tion of percussiones, but there was a penitentiary in Tiree, to
which grave offenders were sentenced for seven or twelve years.^*
The authorship of the Regula Monastica and the Instruc-
tiones is generally admitted. St. Columbanus warns his
children not to attach too much importance to excessive fasting.
" Don't," he says, " suppose that it suffices for us to fatigue
the body by fasts and vigils if we do not also mortify and reform
our moral being " (mores).
The so-called rule of Columbanus consists of nine short
chapters, on obedience, silence, eating, drinking, vanity,
* Seebass has collected the authorities in his Columba von LtixeuUs Klosterrega-.
1888.
Reeves' Adamnan, 350.
THE MONgS. 313
chastity, discretion, mortification ; on the perfection of the
monk ; on the diversity of faults. It is manifestly a fragment,
and its attribution to Columbanus is disputed by some.
As regards food he says : —
Let the food be cheap, and taken in the evening by the monk??,
irho are to avoid eating to satiety or drinking to ebriety, so that (tha
meal) may sustain and not hurt. Vegetables, beans, and such like
(plera et legumina), flour and water (white sauce ?), and small fragments
of bread, so that the stomach may not be loaded and the mind stupefied.
For regard must be had to what is wholesome and nutritious (only) by
those who desire the rewards that are eternal, and therefore the use of
food must be regulated like the performance of labour. For this is
true discretion, to secure the capacity for spiritual progress by absti-
nence, which keeps the flesh in subjection (lii. lean). For if abstinence
exceeds moderation it is a fault and not a virtue. Now, virtue consists
of many things that are good and keeps them active. Therefore (the
monk) must fast as he must pray and labour and read (i.e., learn) every
day.2*
To see regulations of this kind in their true perspective it is
necessary to view them in relation to contemporary modes of
life and standards of comfort and not in comparison with the
luxurious asceticism of monks who wandered far away from
primitive rule and usage. The stone pillow of St. Columba to
a modern ear sounds a more painful austerity than a plank
bed ; but we forget that at that period and down to Tudor
times the pillow in ordinary use was made of wood."^ And
the Englishman who eats three or four square meals a day, not
including his afternoon tea, stands aghast at the folly and
superstition of men who ate only one meal at sundown. Yet
this was the custom in secular life. Captain Cuellar, of the
Spanish Armada, whose ship was wrecked in Donegal Bay,
wrote an account of his misadventures in Ireland to Kinsr
o
** Regula Monaatica, c. lii. Cibus sit vilis et vespertinus monachorum satie-
tatem fugiens, et potus ebrietatem ; ut et sustmeat et non noceat, olera legumina,
farina aqua mixta, cum parvo panis paximatione ne venter oneretur et mens suffo-
setur. Etenim utilitati et usui tantum consulendum est seterna desiderantibus
praemia et ideo temperandus eat ita usus sicut temperandua est labor ; quia haeo
est vera disoretio ut possibilitas spiri talis profectus cum abstinentia carnem raacer-
ante retentetur, si euim modum abstinentia excesserit vitium non virtus erit ;
virtus enim multa sustinet bona et continet ergo quotidie jejunandum est, sicut
quotidie orandum est ; quotidie laborandum, quotidie est legeudum. — Migne, vol.
80, p. 210. The paximentuin appears to have been a hard- baked cake or biscuit,
and to have varied in size. Cassian says in one place that two hardly made a pound
weight. It was, whatever the weight, exclusive of fruit and vegetables, and there
was plenty of milk. See Fleming's note. There is a striking similarity between
our text and the passages in Cassian's Coll. 2, c. 19 and c. 22. — Migne, vol. 80, p. 210.
^ Adamnan says his bed was a hard stone. Tha Vita Seeanda says a skin,
popsibly a sheep's skin, was over it. This was exceptional. Each monk had a
separate bed, with a mattrass, probably of straw, and a pillow.
344 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Philip TI, of Spain, dated October 4th, 1589, from which wc
take the following extract : —
They (i.e., the Irish) live in huts made (? covej ed) with straw. The men
have big bodies, their features and limbs are well made, and they are as
agile as deer. They eat but one meal a day, and that at night, and
their ordinary food is oaten bread and butter. They drink sour milk,
as they have no other beverage, but no water, although it is the best
in the world. On holidays they eat meat half cooked, without bread
or salt. They dress in tight breeches and goat-skin jackets cut short,
but very big, and over all a blanket, and wear their hair down to the
eyes. They are good walkers and have great endurance. They sleep
upon the ground on rushes freshly cut and full of water, or else frozen
stiff. Most of the women are very pretty, but badly dressed. They are
hard workers and good housewives, after their fashion. These savages
liked us very much. Their domain extends forty leagues each way.^^
In the Life of Columbanus, by Jonas, we read of the saint
and his monks reaping a field of wheat. Beer made from
barley, fish, and birds were used. " He commenced to
thresh out the corn, and the monks were seated and the tables
were prepared, and he ordered that they might be strengthened
bj a joyful banquet."
At lona the days of the year were divided into Sundays
and saints' days (dies solemnes) and ordinary days. On ordinary
days every Wednesday and Friday, except during the interval
between Easter and Whitsuntide, was a fast day. The fast
was relaxed, except on great fast days, in the exercise of
hospitality when a stranger arrived. On ordinary fast days
one meal was taken consisting of a moderate share of bread, a
hen egg, and milk mixed with water. During Lent and
Advent all ordinary days were fast days.^'^ On ordinary days,
which were not fast days, the food was simple bread, sometimes
made of barley, milk, fish, eggs, and probably seal's flesh, and
on Sundays and saints' days and on the arrival of guests there
was an improvement of diet, which consisted in an addition to
the principal meal, on which occasion it is probable that
mutton, and even beef, were served up. Ratramnus of Corbie
states it was the general practice of the Scots to have one meal
only at nones (three o'clock), except on Sundays and feast days.
Among the Gael there was no blood-letting or scourging
for the mortification of the body. Hard work and plain living,
accompanied, we are proud to say, in very many cases, witk
high thinking, enabled them to dispense with these heroic
precautions.
^ This was the territory of the Mac Clancys (" Dartres Mic Clancy), coexten-
eive with the present barony of Ross Clogher. The Castle of Ross Clogher, on
the southern shore of L. Melvin, was the residence of the chieftain . — Letter of
Captain Cuellar, H. Sedgwick, p. 69 (condensed) ; and Allingham, H., Cuellar's
Adventures, p. 15.
■■" Reevea' Adamnan, 341-355.
C 345 3
CHAPTER XXIV.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS.
Pro Chrisio peregrinari volms eiiavi'javit
Deciding to go abroad for Christ, he sailed away.
IT was not the pinch of famine nor the fear of poison, the
pitch cap or the triangle, still less the prickings of an
uneasy conscience, that led the Gaelic monks to leave a
land which they loved. It was in obedience to the precepts
of the Gospel, and following the example of our apostle, that
they went forth to teach the heathen. Many a home-sick
heart they carried with them.
Wanderers ever, without pause or rest,
They longed for their country and cradle land.^
"OeoiiAiT) f10|l gxMI fjit -^AW pof
tniAn*M'0 A "O-CltA Y •^ tl-'DUCCOf.
No murmur of regret, however, ever passed the lips of these
brave men. " My country," said Mochonna, one of Columba's
disciples, " is where I can gather the largest harvest for Christ."
There was no desire to turn back ; no craven fear of martyrdom.
They were ever ready to stand and fall in the fighting line,
as became the sons of the soldier.
The first and, perhaps, the greatest of these apostles was
Columba, the Gaelic patron of the Gael. But before we follow
him to the scene of his labours, we must say a word as to the
educational preparation at home that ensured the success
under Providence of the efforts of the missionaries abroad.
At the reception of the faith such education as existed in
Erin may be roughly described as technical, such as we have
seen outlined in the Brehon Law Tracts. There was no
literary training. There was, it is true, an alphabet of a
primitive kind. The letters called Oghams, 24 in number,
* The Tristia in Gaelic, attiibuted to Columba, are not genuine.
346 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
consisted of groups of parallel lines or scores, to the right, left,
or across a vertical stem-line. The groups of parallel lines or
scores vary in number, from one to five, and are placed horizon-
tally or obliquely as regards the vertical stem-line, which is
usually the edge of an upright stone. The vowels, however,
are sometimes represc^nted by short lines or points. The lines
or scores, according to the Gaelic practice, commenced below,
and the arris is to be read upwards. On the second edge the
arris is to be read downwards generally, but sometimes
upwards, like the first arris. Turning the page, so as to
represent an upright pillar, the groups with their values
are: —
h d t c qu
bl £ s n
Opinions vary as to the origin of this alphabet. Bishop
Graves and Professor Rhys are in favour of the Latin alphabet.
Isaac Taylor, on the other hand, a weighty authority, and for
weighty reasons, connects it with the Scandinavian runes. He
says, " That the Oghams were derived from the runes is in-
dicated by the fact that they are found exclusively in regions
where Scandinavian settlements were established, and also by
the fact that the names of the Oghams agree curiously with
the names of the runes of corresponding value. ' The primi-
tive forms of the Ogham symbols would seem to have been
directly suggested by the " tree runes," which are occasionally
found side by side with the ordinary runes. In the Booh of
Ballymote they are referred to the Tuatha De Danaan, who
represent, in all probability, an earlier Scandinavian immigra-
tion."
There have been found in Ireland 155 Ogham inscriptions,
of which 148 are in Cork, Kerry, Waterford, or Kilkenny.
There are twenty Welsh Ogham inscriptions ; seventeen being
in South Wales, two in Devon, one in Cornwall, and some in
^ Older values are proposed for some of these symbols by Rhys.
' Greeks and Gothf, 180. The Alphabet (1899), II. 225.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 347
the Isle of Man and Scotland. It may be safely affirmed that
where the Northmen never came, Ogham inscriptions are never
found.* These inscriptions are all of an obituary or mortuary
character, connected probably with religious motives. No
list of names of kings or chieftains, or fact of historical value,
is found in them. Assuming then, and in our humble judg-
ment the assumption is warranted, that Ogham writing was
used long before the reception of the Faith ; it was not better
suited for literary uses than the cuneiform syllabary, and there
were no clay tablets to facilitate its employment.
Literary culture, therefore, had its beginning with the
coming of our apostle, who is represented in our texts as read-
ing and writing for his converts " alphabets and rudiments of
the Faith." It is interesting to know that, he brought his
script, or mode of writing, from Southern Gaul, and in the
sixth century Ireland became the chief school of Western
caligraphy, and the Irish Uncial blazed forth in full splendour
as the most magnificent of all mediaeval scripts. Some time
in the fifth century a fully formed book-hand must have been
introduced from Gaul by the saint. The cursive writing of
Southern Gaul supplies unmistakable prototypes for the ten
Irish test forms which could not be obtained by any process of
palseographical evolution from the contemporary Roman
uncials. The Roman uncials are rounded capitals : the Irish
uncials are uncialized cursives.^ Since the publication of
Isaac Taylor's work on the alphabet (1899) the second part of
Macalister's Irish Epigraphy has appeared (1902). This
contains an account of Ogham tablets found at Bure in Saxony,
about eleven miles south of Magdeburg. About 1,200 stones
were found, pieces of limestone, big and very little, bearing
scores and figures made with a very sharp tool. The figures
inscribed represent hammers, axes, a shield, two swords crossed,
a tent, a javelin, a spear-head, a sling, a bow, and a bird and
an arrow. Under these figures are written Ogham characters,
that is, parallel lines and a stem line. Mr. Macalister, giving
the Gaelic values to the scripts in six cases, could not discover
the meaning of the words, or even the language. Some of the
other inscriptions looked like Runic letters, but tested by the
known forms of the Runic alphabet were unintelligible. He
* Taylor, Greeks and Goths (1879), III.
^ This is condensctJ from Taylor's Alphabet II.,6.S-178,
348 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
observed that there are several details on these tablets which
suggest that when fuller knowledge is brought to us by future
discoveries the much-derided author of the tract on Osrhams in
the Booh of Ballyniote may yet be acquitted of the charge of
mere childish futility. He thinks that some of the scribings
may be Oghamic shorthand, and that thus works of any length
would not require the cartload of timber postulated by Bishop
Graves for a poem of moderate length in Oghams. We think
this very improbable, but the discovery seems to take us back
towards the Oghamic-like scribings of the Dolmen period
already referred to. Mr. Macalister thinks they were " pro-
bably magical." ^
After St. Patrick had founded his habitations (congabala)
in the territories conquered for the Faith, one of the most
urgent needs of the Church was to make provision for the
education of the clergy. And viq may be sure that he brought
with him alumni of Lerins and Auxerre well qualified to
undertake the task and become the teachers, not only of the
clergy, but also of the laity. The study of Latin, and what is
more remarkable, of Greek and even Hebrew, flourished side by
side with the study of theology, and many of the ministers of
religion were at once sound theologians and accomplished
scholars. " The classic tradition," says Mr. Darmesteter, " lo
all appearance dead in Europe, burst out into full bloom in the
Isle of the Saints, and the Renaissance began in Ireland seven
hundred years before it was known in Italy. During three
centuries Ireland was the asylum of the Higher Learning,
which took sanctuary from the uncultured States of Europe.
At one time Armagh, the religious capital of Christian Ireland,
was the metropolis of civilization." ^ The Higher Learning
took sanctuary in the monasteries; the lamp of knowledge
burned before the altar.
" Deciding to go abroad for Christ he sailed away."^ So
wrote Adamnan, who also tells us that St. Brendan stated at
the Synod of Tailltin that he " saw that St. Columba was
« Macalister, Irish Epigraphy, Part II. (1902), 138.
7 Hyde, 218.
"Hie anno secundo post Culedrebinse bellum aetatis vero suaeXLIII. de Scotia
in Britanniam, pro Christo, peregrinari volens enavigavit, Qui a puero
Christiano deditus tirocinio et sapientiae studiis integritatem corporis et
animae puritatem, Deo Donante custodiens quamvis in terra positus ccelestibua
eeraptum moribus ost-eudebat. Adarauau, Praefatio.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 349
T
foreordained by God to be a leader of peoples to Hfe."^
Columbia was then 42 years of age, 563. He was born in 521.
and died in 597. It is quite a mistake to represent this mis-
sion as a penance and an exile. It was neither. lona war
regarded by Ptolemy and Bede as part of Erin.
In going to lona he was going to his own people. Erca, the
granddaughter of Loarn Mor, the renowned chieftain of Argyl,
was his grandmother.^^ Since the settlement in Alba inter-
mittent war with varying fortunes raged between the Gael
there and the Picts. Three years before, the Gael had sustained
a severe defeat, and Domhangart, their chieftain, who was a first
cousin to Erca, was slain. To end this strife Columba resolved
to convert to Christianity the Picts, who were still heathen,
hoping that in the unity of the Faith they would be drawn
together in the bonds of peace. " The conversion of this strong
race," writes the Yery Rev. Dr. Macgregor, " was an enterprise
worthy of a great missionary. If successful it would be a patriotic
as well as a Christian act ; for binding them to his kinsmen by a
common faith, he would help to prevent the recurrence of war
between them.''
His efforts were successful under difficulties which the
following extract will enable our readers to understand : —
Even imagination can help us but a little way in picturing to our-
selves the Scotland of the time, and those lonely journeys on foot of
the master and his disciples across its rugged mountains and throuijh
its dense forests and among its Weak bogs and morasses, or those still
more dangerous voyages when in frail skiffs they boldly faced the seas
that raged round the Hebrides and the Orkneys. From more sources
than one we can picture to ourselves what Columba and his disciples
were like. We can see them as they journey on foot from one end of
Scotland to the other, as poor and as barely provided for as were
Christ's Apostles, with neither silver nor gold nor brass in their
purses, and over a much wilder country, and among wilder people. I
think of these pure Celts (recte Gael) as they were, as probably in
physical appearance not unlike the Scottish Highlanders of the present
day — a noble race among whom you will find, and not uncommon, as
fine a type of manly beauby as the earth can show, mon of commanding
presence, as we certainly know Columba and Columbxnus were. They
come before us as men with few wants, living on humblest fare, leading an
^ Hunc itaque spernare non audeo quem popiilorum ducera ad vitam a Doo
pro ordinatum video. St. Brendan of Birr died in 573, and St. Columba instituted
a festival at lona in commemoration. Adaranan, III. 4.
^^ Fergus, the son of Conal Gulban, married Erca, the daughter of Loarn Mor
to whom she bore Feidlimidh, the father of Columba, whose mother was Eithne,
loth in descent from Cathair Mor, Ard Righ, 120 A.D.
350 EABLY IRISH HISTORY.
outdoor life, men of powerful physique, capable of great endurance, inured
to hardship and fatigue from their earliest days. We see them as they
march forth from lona in little bands, clad in a simple white tunic, over
which was the usual monkish dress of undyed wool, coarse, but strong
and good, comfortable and most picturesque, bound round the waist
with a strong cord, covering them from head to foot, and serving them
for clothes by day and blanket by night. All their worldly goods they
carry with them on their back in a wallet ; over their shoulder a
leathern water bottle; in their hand a staff. Thus they trudge
sturdily along. It was men like that, and in a way like that, who con-
verted Scotland and England and Northern Europe to God.^^
Reeves gives a list, by no means exhaustive, of 21 of Columba's
foundations among the Picts, and 32 among the Scots of Alba.
" The primitive history of the Church of Scotland," he says, " is
essentially Irish. Situate in the West, Columba's great monastery of
Hy exercised a religious influence which was felt in every quarter of
Scotland. In the extreme North, the Orkneys were rendered safe to
the devout pilgrim by St. Columba ; in the far South, Melrose attained
its greatest celebrity under Eata, one of St. Aidan's twelve disciples ;
and in the Eastern extremity of Pictland, Drostan, son of Cosgrog,
accompanied the indefatigable Columba, when he founded the churches
of Aberdour and Aberlour. Even the nunnery of Colubi or Coldingham
is introduced to notice by the father of English history, to illustrate
his narrative of one Adamnan, a Scot of Ireland. There were, it is
true, two ecclesiastical establishments in the South-west which were not
of Columban origin. Rosnat, the Whithorn of the Saxon, and the
Candida Casa of Latin history, was founded by Ninian prior to St.
Columba's date, while the Episcopal See of Glasgow owes its origin to
St. Kentigern (or Munghu), a Strathcljde Briton." ^^
It is outside the scope of this work to trace the history of
the Columban missionaries in their perilous warfare for Christ,
from Iceland to Tarentum, from Skelig Michael to Vienna.
Their labours in Germany are summarised by a German priest
with becoming gratitude, in his History of the Diocese of
Cologne : —
Mabillon remarks that the Scoti conferred four benefits on the German
people: (1) the Faith; (2) the erection of bishoprics; (3) the intro-
duction of arts and letters ; (4) the knowledge of agriculture. Those
who wish to realise the full extent to which we are indebted to the
Scoti for these blessings have only to read the work of the learned
Spittler,^3 which is worthy of the closest attention.
These missionaries (i.e., the Irish,) feared neither the dangers of the
sea nor of the land. Armed with the cross, they preached Christ
crucified to kings and peoples. They gave their lives for the salvation
11 The Very Rev. Dr. MaoGregor : Commemoration Sermon at lona June 9th
1897.
^'^ Reeves, Guldees, i6.
1^ Grundriss der Oeschichte der Christlichen Kirche.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 351
Faith, but all the civilising institutions of the Christian religion — of our
forefathers. . . . They not only brought the treanre of the schools,
but hospitals, asjlums, shelters for the poor, and all similar retreats.
In the year 844, several of these institutions having been allowed to
fall into disrepair, whether through the negligence of bishops or the
vicissitudes of the times, a decree was passed at the Council of Meaux.
held in that year, ordering hospitals and such foundations to be
restored ' such as they had been instituted by the Scots of old.' Every
province of Germany proclaims this race as its benefactor. Austria
celebrates St. Coleman, St. Virgilius, St. Modestus, and others. To whom
but to the Scots was due the famous " Schottenkloster" of Vienna'?
Salsburg Ratisbon, and all Bavaria, honour St. Virgilius as their apostle.
Similar, honour is paid in different regions to SS. Alto, Marianus, and
Macarius. To whom but to these same monks was due the famous monas-
tery of St. James at Ratisbon ? Burgundy, Alsace, Helvetia. Suevia,
with one voice proclaim the glory of Columbanus, Gall, Fridolin,
Arbogast, Florentius, and Trudpert, who first preached the true religion
amongst them. Who were the founders of the monasteries of St.
Thomas at Strasburg and of St. Nicholas at Memmingen but these same
Scots ? Franconia and the Buchonian forest honour as their apostles
St. Killian and St. Firmin. And the Scottish monasteries of St.
Aegidius and St. James, which in old times flourished at Nuremberg
and Wurzburg, to whom are they to be ascribed but to the holy monks of
ancient Scotia ? The land between the Rhine and the Moselle rejoiced in
the labours of Wendelin and Disibod. The old and famous monastery
of St. James at Mainz was founded, according to the best authorities,
by these same Scots. The Saxons and the tribes of Northern Germany
are indebted to them to an extent which may be judged by the fact
that the first ten bishops who occupied the See of Verdun belonged to
that race.^'*
There is, however, one mission within the British Isles to
which, for many reasons, we must give special and detailed
attention after we have referred briefly to a peculiarity in the
constitution of the Scotch mission, which is mentioned by
Bede. " The island," he wrote, " is wont to have always
an abbot who is a priest, for its ruler, to whose jurisdiction
both all the 2:>rovincia and the bishops also themselves, after
an unusual order, are bound to be subject, according to the
example of him who was their first teacher (i.e., Columba),
who was not a bishop but a priest and monk." ^^ The episcopal
office is regarded by good authorities as twofold, one branch
exercising spiritual authority, potestas ordinis; the other
'* Antiquitates Monasterii Sancti Mar/mi Majoris Coloniensis, I. H. Ressel,
presbyter, Coloniensis, 1863, Hogan, J. F., Irish Monasteries in Germany, Ir. Ecd.
Rec, 1898,533. We have condensed the above from the Rev. Fr. Hogau. His article
on Cologne is one ot a very interesting series on the Irish Monasteries in Gerraany,
which we hope he will find leisure to recast and publish in a connected history.
» H. E. III. 5.
3.52 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
temporal authority, i^otestas jurisdiction is. In Erin, as we
have seen, where, as elsewhere, and nowhere more than in
Italy, the temporalities of the Church were invaded by lay
intruderSjii^ the intruders some times called themselves bishops,
not claiming, however, the potestas ordinis, but only the
potestas jurisdictionis. St. Columba, as a priest, had no
episcopal potestas ordinis^ but exercised the potestas juris,
dictionis in the general management and control of the
temporalities of the mission. In addition, when the bishop,
as was always the case with Columba, was also a monk, he
owed the saint monastic obedience as abbot. The episcopal
and monastic systems there and in Erin were in reality not
two systems but parts of ono and the same system. Thus, as
regards Lindisfarne, Bede tells us that
Aidan, who was the first bishop, was a monk, and led a monastic
life along with his people. Hence, after him all the bishops of that
place until this day exercise the episcopal office in such sort that while
the abbot, who is chosen by the bishop with the consent of the brethren,
governs the monastery, all the priests, deacons, chanters, readers, and
other ecclesiastical Orders, observe in all things the monastic rule
along with the bishop himself^''.
There was no rivalry, no conflict, no recriminations between
abbot and bishop. There were no " perturbations and pro-
mulgations," and no privilegia exempting monasteries from
episcopal visitation and jurisdiction. If the bishop was a
provincial king like Cormac, or a rigdamna like the fiery
abbot of Inis Scattery, he had to fight the battles of his tribe.
So the German bishops, as temporal princes under the feudal
system, donned their coats of mail and mounted their war-
horses and accompanied the Emperor on his march to Rome
And if the muintir of one abbey, which comprised not only
the monks but the folk on the termon lands, with their
friends and supporters, fought against the viuintir of another
abbey, the abbot of Farfa rode with the Emperor, while the
abbot of Monte Casino stood firm for the Pope. With the
exception of these rare quarrels, which were local and probably
arose out of a dispute about a right of way or a turf-bank, the
peace of the Church was a reality in Erin so far as ecclesiastics
were concerned.
^® In Erin, as we have seen, these intruding robbers are called aichidoci —
arrant grabbers in the Tirechan text, Trip. Lij'e, 312.
" Bede, Vita Cuthb., c. U.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 353
St. Augustine landed in Kent some three or four weeks
before the death of St. Columba (July 9th, 597). Kent was
the county of the Jutes, and Ethelbert, their king or chieftain,
was Bretwalda, a sort of ard-righ, exercising some authority
or influence as overlord in the East of England, as far north
as the Humber. He had married, many years before, Bertha,
the daughter of Charibert, King of Paris, and the great grand-
daughter of Clotilde, the wife of Clovis. She was a Christian,
and brought with her to Canterbury, as her soul-friend. Bishop
Luidhard. We cannot doubt that both were anxious for the
conversion of the heathen, and by example at least, if not by
an active propaganda, exercised a salutary influence. They
received, however, no assistance from the Frankish bishops.
Of this the Pope complains : " We are informed," he wrote,
'* that they longingly wish to be converted, but the bishops
and priests of the neighbouring region (France) neglect them."
Whatever preparation may have been made, the honour of
converting the first tribe of the English nation — the Jutes —
belongs to St. Augustine. Ethelbert's nephew, the King of
Essex, which included London, and Essex, too, was for the
time converted, and Millitus was placed in the See of London,
and Justus at Rochester. St. Augustine remained at Canter-
bury until his death (604 or 605).
On Ethelbert's death (616) Essex relapsed into heathenism,
and his son and successor for a time returned to idol worship,
because he would not be allowed to marry his stepmother.
The only solid and permanent result of St. Augustine's work
was the conversion of Kent. Millitus and Justus fled to Gaul,
but Laurentius, the successor of Augustine, was providentially
prevented from joining them.
Kent, an insignificant portion of England, so far as
regarded area (a great portion of it was a vast forest) and
population, having thus received the Faith, there remained
the powerful tribes of the Saxons in the South and East, and
the Angles in the North and Midlands. The Angles occupied
Northumbria, comprising the Kingdom of Bernicia on the North,
and Deira on the South, and extending from the Forth to
Lincolnshire. The Mercians, too, to the South, were Angles.
It was with the Angles of Northumbria that the Columban
missionaries came first in contact. In 625 Edwin, King of
Northumbria, then a heathen, took to wife Ethelburga, the
2 A
354 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
daughter of Ethelbert of Kent. She was attended to York by
Bishop Paulinus and James the Deacon. After a time Edwin
was baptized with many of his chief men on Easter Day, 627.
Edwin was defeated and slain in the Battle of Heathfield (633)
by the heathen King of Mercia and his Christian ally, Ceadwalla,
who overran Northumbria and laid all waste with fire and
sword. The Christian King, as Bede tells us, was more cruel
than the heathen, Paulinus, then fled with Ethelburga by sea to
Kent, and though James the Deacon remained and did what
he could around Catterick, where he resided, the Faith was,
according to the soundest views, virtually extirpated in
Northumbria, As, however, some writers indulge in ,, vague
generalities, stating or suggesting that Northumbria was
largely converted by Paulinus, and that his work was largely
preserved by James the Deacon, and that the conversion of
Northumbria may be fairly claimed for the Augustine Mission,
we shall give a few particulars.
Paulinus brought no priests with him, was joined by no
priests there, ordained no priests there, and when he fled there
was not a single priest between the Forth and the Humber.
Paulinus went into the North of Northumbria with the
King and Queen to a royal residence, Glendale, and stayed
there thirty days, catechising and baptizing people who
came from the surrounding villages and localities. But this
could not be solid and permanent conversion. Bede tells us
that when the Columban monks arrived "in Bernicia (z>., in
Durham, Northumberland, and northwards to Edinburgh)
QO sign, so far as we can discover, of the Christian faith
existed, no church or altar was erected.'' (III., c. 2.) In
Deira {i.e., Yorkshire) at a place where he was often wont
to stay with the King, he baptized in the river Swale which
flows by Catterick, near Richmond, for no oratories or fonts
could yet be made in those parts. He built one wooden church
at Campodunum which was afterwards burnt by the Pagans,
but the altar, which was of stone, escaped, and was preserved
in the monastery in Elmete Wood. This and the church at
York were the only churches ever built by Paulinus. Edwin
was succeeded in Bernicia by Eanfried, and in Deira by Osric.
Both apostatized, and were slain by Ceadwalla within the
year, and with the exception of James, the Deacon, and his
friends and following near Catterick — who cannot have been
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 355
of much account — the light of the Faith was extinofuished in
Northumbria, and the task before the Cohimban mission was
more difficult than if it had never been lighted, for it is easier
to convert a heathen than to reconvert an apostate.
Cead walla, however, did not long enjoy his victory. Oswald
the brother of Eanfried, who had been an exile with the
Picts and Scots, and had received the faith from the Columban
monks at lona, advanced with a small army against him to a
place near Hexham, not far from the Roman Wall, The
battlefield was known in after times as Heavenfield. The day
before the battle, Columba appeared to Oswald as he slept in
his tent, and his lofty stature seemed to touch the clouds.
" Be of good cheer," said the Saint, " and play the man.
Behold, I will be with you. Advance from the camp to-night to
battle, for the Lord has granted to me that this time the foe
shall be put to flight and your enemy, Ceadwalla, delivered into
your hands, and you shall return victorious after the fight, and
reign happily." Oswald then got up and told this vision to his
Council, and the whole army, who were Pagans^ except Oswald
and twelve more who had been baptized by the monks of lona,
promised to receive the faith and be baptized if they were
victorious. Oswald attacked the following night, and
Ceadwalla was routed and slain. " This story my predecessor,
Failbhe, our abbot, told to me, Adamnan. He stated that he
had heard it from the mouth of Oswald himself when he nar-
rated the particulars of his vision to Abbot Seghine (5th Abbot,
623-652.)"^^ Oswald, before the fight commenced, set up a cross,
which was standing in Bede's time. Oswald then became King
of both Bernicia and Deira, and the supremacy of Northumbria
was assured as soon as the tie which bound them together
was firmly knit by a solid and permanent conversion to the
Faith.
As soon as Oswald ascended the throne, being desirous
that all his nation should receive the Christian Faith, whereof
he had had happy experience in vanquishing the barbarians,
he sent to the Elders of the Scots, among whom himself and
his followers in exile had received the sacrament of Baptism,
requesting that they would send him a bishop, by whose
instruction and ministry the English nation, which he governed,
** Adamnan, c. i., and Green, Slaking of England, II., 28.
356 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
might be taught the advantages and receive the sacraments
of the Christian Faith. Nor were they slow in granting his
request, but sent him Bishop Aidan, a man of singular meekness,
piety, and moderation, zealous in the cause of God, though not
altogether according to knowledge ; for he was wont to keep
Easter according to the custom of his country, which we have
before so often mentioned, from the 14th to the 20th Moon.
But the Scots of the South had long since (jamdudum), by
the admonition of the Bishop of the Apostolic See, learned tc
observe Easter according to the canonical custom.^^ The King
appointed him as his Episcopal Seat the Isle of Lindisfarne,
which lay off the coast of Bernicia, near Bamborough, which
was the royal seat. When Aidan, who was not skilful in the
English tongue, preached the Gospel, it was delightful to hear
the King himself interpreting the word of God to his captains
and ministers (ducihus et ministris), for he had perfectly
learned the language of the Scots during his long exile. From
that time many of the Scots came from their parts {i.e., lona)
daily into Britain, and with great devotion preached the Word
to those provinces of the English over which the King reigned,
and those among them that had received priest's orders
administered to them the grace of Baptism. Churches were
built in several places, the people joyfully flocked together to
hear the Word. Money and lands were given of the King's
bounty to build monasteries, the English, great and small,
were by their Scottish teachers instructed in the rules of
monastic discipline, as well as the higher branches of education
{ciiifn majoribus studiis), for most of them that came to preach
were monks.''^'^
From the English youth Aidan selected twelve " to be
specially instructed in the knowledge of Christ." Among
these was Eata. who was afterwards Bishop of Lindisfarne.
If our readers will compare these methods and this
organisation with the action of Paulinus they will readily
comprehend the superficial and sporadic character of the work
^' Jamdiidum — long since. This appears a strong word here. The Synod
in which the ' ' canonical Esister " was adopted was held in 632 or 633, only two
or three years before.
20 Lindisfarne, or Holy Island, on the coast of Northumberland, near Bamborough
Castle, is 13 miles S.E. of Berwick-on-Tweed. It is 3 miles by 1^ miles, nearly
the same size as lona, and half of it is cultivated. The passage from the mainland
is dry sand at low water, about If miles in length.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 357
of the latter, who, however, it must be said, did not set before
himself the task of evangelizing the Angles. To complete
Bede's description, which comes after the expulsion of Coleman,
to be presently related, and which he gives with evident relish
as a severe rebuke to the spiritual decadence of his own time,
we add further from him : —
Aidan was wont to go about to all places in town and country on
foot unless any urgent necessity compelled him. Moreover, Aidan's
course of life was so different from the slothfulness of ours that all who
walked with him, whether tonsured or laics, were employed in study,
that is, either in reading the Scriptures or in learning the Psalms.
]Sever through fear or respect did he fail to reprove the rich if they
had gone wrong in aught, but corrected them, with a severe rebuke.
He was never wont to give money to the powerful of the world, but
what he got from them he gave to the poor, i.e., dispensed in ransoming
those who had been unjustly sold. The whole thought of Aidan and
his successors and all the missionaries was to serve God, and not the
world ; their whole care to nourish the soul not the belly. Whence
also the religious habit was held at that time in great veneration, so
that wherever a priest or monk came he was received as the servant of
God ; and if they chanced to meet him on the way they ran to him
and, bowing, were glad to be signed with his hand or blessed with his
mouth. Also they gave heed diligently to his words of exhortation.
On Sundays they flocked eagerly to the church or the monasteries, not
to feed their bodies but to hear the word of God. Stirred up by
Aidan's example, men and women who were "religious" adopted the
custom of fasting on Wednesdays and Fridays till the ninth hour (three
o'clock) throughout the year, except during the fifty days after Easter.
They were so free from worldly avarice that none of them received
lands and possessions for building monasteries unless they were com-
pelled to do so by " the powers that be," which custom was for
some little time after (6G4) observed in all the Churches of North umbria.
Bede almost forgave Aidan for keeping Easter on the 14th
moon.
He kept it not, as some falsely suppose, on the 14th moon on any
day of the week with the Jews, but on the Lord's Day, from the 14th
moon to the 20th, on account of his belief in the Lord's Resurrection
on that day. In the celebration of his Easter he kept in heart,
venerated, and preached nothing but what we do, that is the redemption
of the human race through the Passion and Resurrection into Heaven
of the Mediator between God and men, of the Man Jesus Christ."^
And Aidan's teaching was chiefly commended to all by the circumstance
that he himself taught no otherwise than as he and his followers lived.
^^ Aidan died in 651 and was succeeded by Finan, who was succeeded in 661
by Coleman, another monk from lona. All three had episcopal charge of all North -
umbria. It was in Coleman's time that the great conflict, as Bede calln it, took
place on the Easter question at Whitby. The dispute ended in the rout of the
Columban, and the triumphant entry of the DenedictiDe, monks.
358 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
We may add here, with Bede, " But enough has now been
said on this subject." ^^
It is needless to say that we do not intend to open here
the question of the Easter controversy. We shall only offer
some observations to enable our readers to understand the
precise issue, to use a legal phrase, which was raised at Whitby.
The Jewish year was lunar, each month consisting of 28 days,
and commencing with the new moon. The first month of the
year was called Nisan. The full moon was on the 14th, and
to bring the lunar year into correspondence with the solar an
intercalary month was introduced, so that the 14th of Nisan
fell on the 14th of the first month after the vernal equinox, as
a general rule. The 14th day of the visible moon in Nisan is
held to have determined the Jewish Passover. " In the 14th
day at even is the Lord's Passover." And again: "In the
first month, on the 14th day of the month, at even, ye shall
eat unleavened bread until the one and twentieth day of the
month at even." All parties agreed that the Passion of our
Lord occurred on the 14th Nisan, and that, counting inclusively,
the Resurrection occurred on the third day following. If the
14th Nisan fell on a Friday all parties agreed in celebrating
the Passion on that Friday and the Resurrection on the
following Sunday.
When, however, the 14th Nisan did not fall on a Friday,
but, say, on a Monday, a divergence began. The Quarto-
deciraans, i.e., the fourteenth-day men, as they were called,
celebrated the Passion on the Monday, regulating the time of the
celebration solely by the day of the month ; while the Orthodox,
as we may call them in that case, waited until the following
Friday to celebrate the Passion and for the following Sun-
day to celebrate the Resurrection. Again, of the Quarlo-
decimans, there were two kinds, i.e. (1) One, the heretical
Ebionites " who held, with the continuance of the obligation
of ancient (Jewish) law in general, the validity of the old legal
Passover. Their festival, then, properly speaking, was not
Christian ; it was rather Jewish (293)." *^ (2) There was a second
kind of Quartodecimans, who believed in the abrogation of
^ What we have written ia condensed from H. E. III., e. 5, and 26. Bede's
language lias been retained as far as postsible.
2s Hefde I. (Clark), I. 293. — The numerals In brackets refer to the pages of
this volume.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIONS. 359
the Old Law, and celebrated Easter on the 14th Nisan, as a
Christian celebration, irrespective of the day of the week. It
was these latter, we think, that the Council of Nicaea had
principally in view. None of the Canons of the Council of
Nicaea, not even those of doubtful authenticity, treat of the
celebration of the Easter festival (327). Perhaps the Council
wished to conciliate those who were not ready to give up
immediately the customs of the (Orthodox) Quartodecimans.
It refused to anathematise a practice which had been handed
down from apostolic times in several Orthodox Churches (328).
There were, besides the Canons, (1) an Encyclical Letter of the
Council, which states, "All the brethren in the East, who
formerly celebrated Easter with the Jews, will henceforth keep
it with the Romans ; " and (2) the circular letter of the
Emperor Constantino, which is more specific : —
In rejecting their (i.e., the Jewish) custom, we shall transmit to our
descendants the legitimate mode of celebrating Easter, which we have
observed from the time of the Saviour's Passion to the present day
(according to the days of the week)."^^ We ought not, therefore, to have
anything in common with the Jews, for the Saviour has shown us
another way ; our worship follows a more legitimate and more con-
venient course (the order of the days oj the week). Unanimously adopting
this, we desire, dearest brethren, to separate ourselves from the detest-
able company of the Jews (322)."
The Gaelic use conformed strictly to this. The Passion was
celebrated on Friday, and the Resurrection on Sunday. And
further, when the 14th Nisan fell on Sunday they celebrated
Easter on that day, as was, of course, done always by the
orthodox Quartodecimans ; and they always asserted, as the
fact was, that in doing so they followed the use of the party
calling themselves Johannites, rejecting, however, that portion
of their use which allowed the celebration on week days of
Easter, thus conforming to the circular letter of the Emperor.
When the 14th Nisan fell on Sunday the Roman use was to
wait for the next Sunday, so that the Roman Palm Sunday was
the Easterday of the Gael. When the 14th Nisan did not fall
on Sunday there was no difference between them.
And how often would the 14th Nisan fall on Sunday?
Easter is not regulated according to the visible moon or the
mean astronomical moon, nor by the true calculated time of the
new moon.
'^N.B. — The words in brackets are Hefele's, indicating his view, to which we
ittach the higlient importance.
360 EAKLY IRISH HISTORY.
Easter is regulated according to the age of the Calendar
or Ecclesiastical moon. All the day on which the new moon
is supposed to occur {i.e. the calendar moon) though it be
only a minute before midnight, is reckoned the first day of the
moon. Easter day is the Sunday following thskt fourteenth day
of the Calendar moon, which 14th day happens upon or next
after the 21st day of March. So that if the said 14th day be a
Sunday, Easter day is not that Sunday, but the next. The
earliest possible Easter is thus the 22nd March, the latest the
25th April. If the 14th moon falls on 20th day of March it is
necessary to wait for the 14th day of the next moon, which will
fall on the 18th of April, and if this day is Sunday, Easter
day will be the following Sunday, April 25th. We are unable
to say how often the 14th moon fell on the 21st day of March ;
but we find it stated that Easter occurred only four times on the
22nd day of March since the new style was introduced (1582).
In 1761 and 1818 Easter day fell on 22nd of March, but neither
in the present nor in the following century will this be the
case again, and we fancy the 14th moon did not fall oftener on
the 2lst of March. The latest Easter occurs, in the 19th and
20th centuries, in 1886 and 1943 only. So that the 14th moon
appears, as we infer, to occur only on these occasions, on the
20th of March, as we have explained.
This question of the celebration of Easter on the 14th moon
being Sunday, which we shall call the Gaelic use, must be kept
distinct from the question of the methods of computing the
various cycles?^
"^^ The Easter question is discussed by A. De Morgan in the Companion to
the British Almanac/,:, 1845. In this year the full moon that came first after the
2ist of March — i.e., the inooii of the heavens — was Easter Sunday, which waa
regtilated by the Calendar.
To illustrate our view let us explain. A new calendar moon (epact) on the
8th March becomes "the 14th moon" on the 21st. Therefore, to have a 14th
moon on the 2l8t we must have a new moon on the 8th March. Now, referring
to the "Extended Table of Epacts," i.e., new moons, in Enci/dopcedia Britannica
(vol. iv., 673) the line B represents the line of epacts for three centuries, from
900 to 1200. The ep:Lct for the 8th of March during this period is S-i, which
iloes not oc«ur among the epacts on line B, so that for these three centuries there
will be no new calendar moon on the 8th March, and no 14th moon on the 21st
March, and no Easter Sunday on the •22ud. The epact 23 occurs in other linos
of epacts generally once in the cycle of 19 years, never more, in the Table
mentioned, so that if the new moon fell on the 8th, as the 14th might fall on any
day of the week, it is against probability that it would occur more than once in a
oentury. The writer of the article on Euster (in the Diet, of Christ. Antiq., vol. I.,
p. 673) says that the 14th moon fell on iSunday (the 'ilst of Match as we understand
him) in 64.3, 647, 648, 651. This means that the new moon fell on the 8th of
March in each of these years, and that the 14th fell always on the Sunday. There
must be Bonie mistake here. Bede refers to one occasiou only.
THE TEACHING OF THE NATIO^^S. 361
We cannot open the question of the formation of the cycles
here. The difficulties of arranging one which should give a
true equinox, a true new moon, with fixed days of the month
and week, were practically insuperable. The age of the moon,
for one thing, varied with longitude. The moon at Dublin
might rise at 10 minutes after 12 o'clock at midnight on the
20th of March, and Easter would come on that moon. At
Greenwich it would rise 10 minutes before midnight on the 20th
of March, and it would be necessary to wait for the next moon.
There were numerous cycles. We need only mention Hippolytus,
a cycle of 16 years (A.D. 225c) ; Theophilus of Alexandria, A.D.
380, with a cycle of 437 years ; Cyril of Alexandria, A.D. 412,
with one of 95 years, which was very celebrated ; Victorinus,
of Acquitaine, said to be the real author of the Dionysiau
tjycle of 532 years, which is assigned to A.D. 530c, and which
was arranged by Dionysius Exiguus, an abbot at Rome. The
divergences between these cycles were very great, and Easter
was celebrated by the orthodox at widely different times.
In 387, as we learn from a letter of St. Ambrose (Ep. 23),
the churches of Gaul kept Easter on the 21st of March, the
churches of Italy on April the 18th, and the churches of Egypt
on April the 25th. But the Gaelic use had nothing to say to
this, and this divergence would have existed just the same if
the Gael kept the Roman Easter as defined by Bede, i.e., from
the 15th to the 21st moon. The only difference that could
have arisen from the Gaelic use was that the Roman Palm
Sunday might possibly be the Gaelic Easter day once or twice
in a century. There remained, however, in the Gaelic use
what the old lawyers would call a scintilla of heresy, just
enough to enable an adroit adversary to brand them as
Quartodecimans, and as some Quartodecimans were heretics,
an undetected flaw in the logic would carry him through
in proving that the Scots were heretics and should be
"eliminated" by the secular arm. Aldhelm charges the
Cornish with being Quartodecimans and heretics.^^ Sigebert,
a Benedictine monk of Gerabloux, near Namur (1103-1112),
states boldly that " Coluraba, in his rustic simplicity, neither
learned nor taught the celebration of Easter on the Sunday,"'^'^
2« H. db S. Ill, 271.
■^ Coluinba rusticas implicitate pascha dominica die celebrari neque didicit
neque docuit. Alon. Germ. VII. 3iiQ, ad. ann. 59S.
362 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
i.e., that he kept Easter on week-days like the heretical
Quartodecimans. The letter from Rome in 640 during the
vacancy of the chair, equivalent to a Papal Rescript, which is
given by Bede, refers to the Gaelic use, as a renovation of the
Quartodeciman heresy, " endeavouring against the true Faith
to revive a new heresy from an old one and striving to celebrate
Easter on the 14th moon with the Jews.-^ Finally, " it was
revealed by the Holy Spirit" to a Benedictine nun, as she
tells us, in 1170, and published under authority to the world
in her Life of St. Desihod (+674), that when he was bishop
of some unnamed See in Ireland (probably not long before the
Synod at Whitby), which he held, she saj^s, for ten years, the
people rejecting the Old and New Testament and, rejecting
Christ, followed the sect of the JewsP It was undoubtedly on
the charge of heresy, as we shall see, that the Columban
monks were, in Bede's words, " exposed and eliminated " —
literally turned out of house and home ; in one hateful word,
evicted.^^
^ Novam ex veteri hreresi renovare conantes . . . pascha nostrum refutantes ct
xiiii., luna cum Hebrieis celebrare nitentcs. — H. E. ii. c. 19.
^ Aliis quidam Veteri et Novo ToBtamento resistentibus Christumquo abne-
gantibus aliis sectam Judaeorum apprehendentibus. — Vita Disibodi, Migne, torn.
97, p. 1,100. " Est historia divinitus revelata sed (sic) propter anthoris singularem
sanctitatem et authoritatem minime contemnenda ! " — Surnis Vita, July 8.
^ Detpcta et eliminata ut supra docuimua Scotorum secta — H. £., v. 19.
" The name ' Quartodecimans ' was always a haudy stick with which to beat the
Celtic dog." — Plumraer, H. E., ii. 114. Surely it ia a cruel and cowardly policy to
cudgel the watch-dog to placate the highwayman.
[ 363 J
CHAPTER XXV.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS.
DOME was not consulted and knew nothing about the pro-
ceedings that led up to the elimination of the " Sect of the
Scots." Deusdedit was then Archbishop of Canterbury. He
had neither art nor part in them. This will, of course, carry
no weight with men who still maintain that the Scottish
church was independent, and not in communion with Rome.
"We shall not pause here to argue this point. The statement
of our apostle, which we have already given, suffices for us, and
if any of our readers desires corroboration he will find abun-
dant evidence in the Essays of Cardinal Moran. There is,
however, another view which is more insidious and equally
untenable. It is indicated by the heading of the chapter in
which Montalembert introduces the career of Wilfrid : St.
Wilfrid establishes Roman Unity and the Benedictine Order.
And again — The end of the Celtic Heresy.^
This view when developed reaches the proposition that the
Gaelic Church, while admitting and submitting to the supreme
authority and jurisdiction of the Holy See in matters of
doctrine, was disobedient, recalcitrant, schismatical, and,
possibly, heretical in matters of discipline, in which it main-
tained an independent attitude. The letters of Columbanus to
the Holy See prove conclusively that he was not only ready
to accept, but eager to receive, the "Cathedral Judgment" of the
Pope on the Paschal question.
There are some expressions in these letters for which he
himself claims a very necessary indulgence. It was, however, no
unusual thing in medieeval times for the Pope to receive a
little lecture from some male or female saint, generally veiled
under tbe form of exhortation. These, Gregory, being a monk
himself, and thus knowing the ways of monks, would read
1 Book XII ., c. 3.
364 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
with a smiie. Autres temps, autres moeurs. " The native
liberty of my race," writes Columbanus, " has given me that
boldness. With us it is not the person but reason that counts.''
(iVon enim apud nos persona sed ratio valet.) " We are bound
to the chair of Peter. There has never been either a heretic,
a Jew, or a schismatic amongst us. We receive nothing more
than the apostolical and evangelical doctrine. Rome is the head
of the Churches of the world, saving only the special preroga-
tive of the place of the Lord's resurrection,"* Columbanus
evidently refers to the 7th Nicaean Canon, which has puzzled
many, but was evidently intended to preserve some honorary
privilege to the Church of Jerusalem as being the oldest. A
courtier priest would not have mentioned it here ; but then
courtier priests are seldom saints.
The letters of Columbanus to Gregory and to Boniface
not only show clearly that he recognized the authority of the
Holy See in matters of discipline but intimate plainly that he
was prepared to abide by the Pope's decision on the Paschal
question. In the first letter to Gregory he seeks his
guidance (1) on the Paschal question (2) on holding communion
with simoniacal bishops, of whom there were many in the
province {i.e., Gaul), and (3) about clerics who had been pro-
moted to the rank of bishops after violating the rules as to
celibacy^ whilst deacons. And in the letter to Pope Boniface
he says — " We pour forth our prayers to thee that if it be not
contrary to faith you will give us, struggling pilgrims, the
comfort of your pitiful decision, by which you will support the
tradition of our elders, by which it will be in our power, by
your judgment, during our pilgrimage (in this life) to keep
Easter according to the use we have received from our fathers."^
If the Holy See had then adjudged that the keeping of Easter
on the 14th moon, being Sunday, was contrary to the faith, or
enjoined the use of a particular cycle, it is plain that Columbanus
and his muintir would, though perhaps grudgingly, and with
ill grace, have acquiesced. The Holy See did neither.
' Roma orbis terrarum caput est eccle&iarum salva loci Dominicas resurrectionis
singulari prx-i-ogativa. — 7th Canon.
* Columbanus calls it adxdterium cum clientelis, which probably meant
simple concubinage.
■• Preces fundimus ut nobis peregrinis laborantibus tuie piae sentontiae
praestes solatium quo ei non contra fidem est, nostrorum trailitionem roboreg
seniorum quo ritum Paschae ?icut accepimas a majoribus observare per tuum
possiraus judicium in nostra peregriuatione. — Migne, vol. 80, p. 269.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 865
The contents of Columbanus's letters to Gregory, we may
assume, became known to the bishops. The letters were inter-
cepted, and never reached the Pope. And the bishops in turn
retaliated on Columbanus for his opposition to popular vices.
They denounced him as a Quartodeciman. " We ought not,"
they proclaimed (as Columbanus states in one of his letters to
Pope Gregory) " celebrate Easter with the Jews : Gum Jud<xis
Faseha facere non debermus." A reformer is bound to make
bitter enemies, and Columbanus could not expect to fare better
than St. Martin.^ On his arrival in France the moral condition
of the whole nation was deplorable.
The Merovingian kings practised polygamy and simony,
and concubinage prevailed amongst the clergy. Nor were the
nunneries free from scandals. A short time before his arrival
a mutiny took place in the great convent of St. Croix at
Poictiers. It was headed by a princess of the reigning house.
The mutineers broke out of the convent. Grave scandals
followed. The princess assembled an army of desperadoes,
stormed the convent, and threatened to throw the abbess over
the battlements. Under the circumstances, Columbanus,
even if his ways were gentle, tactful, and conciliatory — which
we must admit they were not — could not avoid making
enemies. He was expelled by Brunehault, but his mission
had done, and continued still to do, good work and prosper.
Luxeuil became the recognised monastic capital of all the
countries under Frankish government — a nursery of bishops
and abbots, of preachers and reformers. From the banks of
the Lake of Geneva to the North Sea every year saw the rise
of some daughter house. "It would be a hard task," says
Montalembert, " to trace that monastic colonization of Gaul,
which had during the whole of the 7th century its centre in
Luxeuil." We may mention Lure, Romain Moutier in a pass
on the southern side of the Jura, Beze, St. Ursanne, at the
head waters of the Doubs, Moustier-Grandval, Corbie eight
' Martin after returning to his diocese (after saving the lives of the
Priscillianists (whom the bishops desired that Maximus should have executed for
heresy) had also to undergo the scandalous envy and enmity of many bishops and
of those priests of Gaul who had been so soon tainted by Roman luxury, etc.—
Montalembert, I. 344.
After St. Jerome ( + 420) St. Augustin ( + 430) after the fathers of Lerins
whose splendour faded towards 450, there was a kind of eclipse, and the monastic
institution seemed to have fallen into the sterility and torpor of the East. —
Montalembert, I. 384.
3(36 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
miles east of Amiens, from which went St. Ansgar, the apostle,
of Sweden and the Danes, St. Bertin at St. Omer, St. Riquier,
near the Sorame, Fontenelle and Jumieges, in the diocese of
Rouen, near the Seine, Reuil and Rebais, near the Marne,
Lagny-sur-Marne, where St. Fursey died, Moutier la Oelle, near
Troyes, and further east Hautvilliers and Moutier-en-Der, St.
Sallberga, near Laon, Solognac, near Poictiers, St. Gall,
near the spot where the Rhone enters Lake Constance,
Dissentis at the head waters of the Rhine, Bobbio
near the classic Trebbia, 25 m. S.E. of Pavia where the great
apostle died in 615 A.D. and, last but not least, the foundations,
more celebrated as convents for ladies than as monasteries,
Jonarre near Meaux, the diocese of Bossuet, Faremoutier in
Champagne, and Remiremont,^ in the Vosges Mountains
15m. S.E. of Epinal. From the death of Columbanus (615)
whea his muintir seemed to be solidly established in France,
a movement commenced to get rid of the Columban system
and replace it by the Benedictine. This was supported by the
whole weight of the Papacy from Gregory onwards. The
Benedictines were then all-powerful.
A condominium was the first step. The two rules were
placed side by side in the Columban house, and as the
Benedictine yoke was lighter and the reins more loosely held,
it gradually prevailed. It was only natural that the monks
should choose the easiest road to Heaven, though in the result
it might prove somewhat longer than they expected, In the
words of Montalembert : " Columbanus sowed and Benedict
reaped."' Finally things came to such a pass that the rule of
the condominium had to be reformed, and the reformed rule, at
the instance of St. Benedict of Aniane, was made compulsory
and enforced, as we have already mentioned, by the secular
arm on all monasteries within the empire. Even as early as
670, at a Council at Autun of 54 bishops, held by St. Leger,
the observance of the rule of St. Benedict was enjoined on all
" regulars '' i.e., monks. This was only six years after
® The nuns were afterwards changed to Canonesses. The Abbess alone took
perpetual vows. Proofs of nobility were required as at Epinal and Porresey. In
the last mentioued, which was the lowest in rank, eight paternal and eight
maternal quarterings were required. The Canonesses were called the ladies of
Remiremont, the chambermaids of Epinal and the laundresses of Porresey. This
was of course after the " elimination " of the Columban monks, when the Abbeasi
ranked as a princess of the Holy Roman Empire. — Montalembert II., 35i.
7 Hefele (Clark) Vol. C.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 367
the Synod of Whitby, to which we must now direct our
narrative.^
The protagonist, perhaps we should say the persecutor, in
the controversy was Wilfrid, then thirty years of age, who had
recently received priest's orders. His life has been written by
Eddi, or Eddius, a Benedictine monk, who published it with the
approval of his superiors. It may, therefore, be fairly regarded as
an official record of Wilfrid's life from the Benedictine standpoint.
What Bede has said about him rests almost entirely on the
narrative of Eddius, except the account he gives of the Synod
of Whitby, and here he is fuller, more learned and less reliable.
We shall follow Eddius. From him we learn that Wilfrid
came of a good Northumbrian family. In his 14th year he
entered Lindisfarne, where, as we have seen, the Oolumban
monks kept a school for gentle and simple.
It is said he did not agree with his stepmother, which,
judging from after events, does not at all imply that the fault
was entirely on her side. Eddius tells us that his father
provided him with a suitable princely outfit, arras and horses,
for himself and his attendants (pueris), and, giving him his
blessing, sent him to the King's Court at Bamborough. Here
he was well received by the men whom he waited on at his
father's table. He was presented to the queen. His good
looks and ready wit made a favourable impression, and she
promised to befriend him. " He had left the broad acres of his
father to seek a celestial kingdom," Eddius assures us. The
princely equipment, however, would be more easily understood
by us if he had earthly ambitions in view. At any rate he
went to Lindisfarne, but though he remained there " a circle of
years," probably four or five, he did not receive the tonsure.
Then, being still a layman, " this wise-minded youth perceived
by degrees that the way of virtue delivered by the Scots was
very defective" and expressed a wish to visit Rome. The
abbot at Lindisfarne at once assented to his dear son receiving
the greatest of all earthly blessings, i.e., the privilege of visiting
the tombs of the apostles.* This does not look as if the
• The rule of Columbanu3 was gradually eclipsed, and the rule of Benedict
was introduced and triumphed everywhere, whilst still we cannot instance a single
man above the ordinary mark, a single celebrated saint who could have contributed
to that surprising victory by his personal influence. — Montalembert II., 357.
•Hunc autem sensum domino suo enotuit, qui statim, ut erat sapiens, sug.
gfestum a Deo esse cognoscens oonsensum dedit filio suo carissimo omnis boni
caput accipere. — Edd. c. 3.
368 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Columbans were at variance with Rome, or had any great wish
to retain Wilfrid in the monastery. The Queen Eanfleda, by
the advice of his father, then sent him in honourable manner
to her cousin, Erconbert, King of Kent. During his stay in
Kent an incident occurred which ought to have taught him a
lesson in toleration. At Lindisfarne he had learned the revised
translation of the Psalter which Jerome made from the
Septuagint. A less correct version, of an earlier date, a cursory
revision of the old Itala, was in use in Kent. Nobody thought
of persecuting the monks at Canterbury because they did not
use the better recension. Wilfred learned their Psalter without
demur, and was none the worse for it. After a year he set out
with Benedict Biscop for Rome. They parted company at
Lyons. Benedict went on to Rome and Wilfrid remained.
Delfinus (rede, it is said, Annenundus) the archbishop, thought
seemingly that Wilfrid was better suited for secular life, and
offered to provide him with a wife in the person of his niece,
saying, " If you remain with me I will give you faithfully a
good part of the Gauls to govern as a secular (in saeculam)
and the virgin daughter of my brother to wife, and will myself
adopt you as a son." ^^ Wilfrid answered, " that he had made a
vow to the Lord that he would visit the Apostolic See to learn
the rules of Ecclesiastical discipline, but if he lived he would
see his face on his way back." To Rome then he went, and
after a stay of six months returned to Lyons, where he remained
three years. The archbishop then gave him the Roman tonsure
and the order of subdeacon, probably intending to make him
his successor {hxredera), but he was unfortunately murdered in
657 or 658, on some political charge, by the order of Ebroin.
the Mayor of the Palace. Wilfrid then returned to England.
We can only surmise what would have happened but for the
murder of the archbishop. Oswy's son, Alchfrid, was then
sub-king over Deira, and all was well up to this time between
him and the Columbans. Some three years before Alchfrid had
invited Columban monks from Melrose and given them lands at
^•^Si manseris mecum fiducialiter dabo tibi bonam partem galliarum ad regendam
in seculum, virginemque filiam fratria mei in uxorem, et teipsum adoptivum filiuni
habebo et tu me patrem in omnibus fideliter adjuvanteui. — ^Edd. Vita, c. 6.
We think the context supports the view we present that the otfer was that
Wilfrid should marry the niece and then take orders as a secular. It is very
unlikely that the archbishop could have power to appoint a foreigner as civil
governor over an important district. We cannot accept Major and Lumby's
translation, "a good part of Gaul to rule for ever" (Bedae Hist., p. 271. We
think in saecalinn means here as a secular priest.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 369
Ripon to build a monastery, which was in due time consecrated,
and Eata became the first abbot. He was not destined
to hold the abbey lands, the abbey, or the abbacy long.
Wilfrid came upon the scene. He had evidently brought
with him from the south of France the hostile feelings
of the southern bishops against the Columban monks, and
the old battlecry, " We ought not to celebrate Easter with
the Jews." He had also brought with him, no doubt, the latest
novelty in Paschal Tables — the Cycle of Dionysius the Little.
Dionysius, a Scythian and a monk in a Roman monastery, in
526 drew up five nineteen-year cycles, from 532 to 626, and
prefixed to his Table two explanatory letters. " The first
letter contains one of the most audacious falsehoods on record.
In elucidating the Easter method, he follows, he states, in all
things the decree of the 318 Nicene Pontiffs, who composed a
(lecemnovenal cycle of Paschal 14th moons to last for ever, a
rale sanctioned by them not so much owing to secular know-
ledge as to illumination of the Holy Spirit.^^ This is taken
from the Proterian letter, with 318 Nicene Pontiffs
substituted for our most blessed (Alexandrine) fathers in
the original ! ! " There was, as we have already stated, no
such canon made at the Council of Nicaea ; but if there had
been one in the usual form, with an anathema against any one
offending wilfully against it, he would have been outside
the pale of the Church. Wilfrid, who is found at the
court of Alchfrid as his adviser, soon after his arrival in
Britain opened the campaign with an attack on Eata and the
monks at Ripon. " Conform or clear out " was his ultimatum.
The secular arm did the rest. Bede tells us in his Life of
Cuthbert, " When some years after it pleased King Alchfrid,
for the redemption of his soul, to give to the Abbot Eata a
certain domain in his kingdom called Ripon, there to con-
struct a monastery, the same Abbot took some of the brethren
along with him, among whom Cuthbert was one. He founded
the required monastery, and in it instituted the same
discipline which he had previously established at Melrose."
" Here Cuthbert was appointed as guest-master, and
going out one day from the inner buildings of the
^^ Dr. MacCarthy in his note gives the parallel passages from the Proterian
letter and Dionysius showing the lalsification, and cites Duchesne {Lib. Pontif.
(18S6) p. Uiv.— " Cette decision u'a jamais exists.") Ann. U'-st. l.V. Ivii,
S B
870 EARLY IRISH HISTORr.
monastery to the guest-chamber he found a young man
there etc." — CVII. "Meanwhile, since the whole con-
dition of this world is fragile and unsteady as the sea
when a sudden tornado arises, the above-named abbot Eata,
with Cuthbert and the rest of the brethren whom he had
brought with him, were driven back home (repulsus doynum)
and all the monastery which he had founded, with the lands,
was given to other monks to occupy." — CVIII. The Columbans,
like many a Gael in after time, refused to conform, and were
evicted, and their lands and buildings were taken over by
Wilfrid, who had, moreover, previously obtained from Alchfrid
a large grant of land at Stamford Bridge. " Further," writes
Bede, " Alchfrid having for his instructor in Christian learninc;
Wilfrid, a most learned man (for he had gone to Rome
previously for the sake of ecclesiastical doctrine, and had spent
a long time with Delfinus, Archbishop of Lyons, from whom
also he had received the crown of the ecclesiastical tonsure)
knew that his teaching was to be justly preferred to all the
traditions of the Scots. Wherefore he had also given him a
monastery of forty families in a place called Ripon, which
place, to wit, he had granted some short time previously to
those who followed the Scots as the possessors of a monastery.
But because afteriuards when the option was given them they
were willing rather to quit the place than to change their use,
he gave it to him {i.e., Wilfrid) whose teaching and life were
worthy of the place. — H.E. III.,c. 25. This iniquitous confisca-
tion took place in 6G1 or, at latest, in 662 ; two or three years
before the Synod at Whitby. The Columbans were evicted
before trial, because their doctrine, not their computation on
the Paschal question, was deemed not worthy of the place.
Some time after this Wilfrid received the order of priesthood.
Being in the diocese of Coleman, whom Eddius styles
metropolitan bishop of York, Coleman was the proper person to
ordain him, and no other prelate could, according to the well-
established Canon, ordain a priest in his diocese without
formal leave obtained from him. Wilfrid, however, disregarded
the rule. Probably he did not consider Coleman a bishop at
all, though Eddius inaccurately describes him as a metro-
politan. There was at the time a bishop named Agilbert
staying in Deira on his way to Era ace. He was a Gaul by
birth, but had lived many years in (the South of) Ireland
THE SECT CF THE SCOTS. 871
for the purpose of studyinpf the Scriptures. Having been
consecrated bishop he went into WeiBsex, where King Coinwalch
appointed him bishop of his territory. He was probably
consecrated in Ireland, as, if he had been consecrated in
France, Bede would not have omitted to say so. After a time
Coinwalch, tired of his barbarous dialect, divided the diocese
and gave Wini an episcopal See in the southern half, at
Winchester. Wini, we may add, was expelled a few years
later, and then bought for money the episcopal See of London
Agilbert took umbrage at the division of his diocese made
without his consent. He was not content with the northern
half, i.e., with the See of Dorchester, and he resolved to leave
Wessex and return to Gaul. He was, we may conjecture, on a
visit to Deira before starting, when both he and Wilfrid set
the Canon Law at defianca. When St. Falco of Tongres crossed
the border of the diocese of St. Remigius and ordained priests
at Mouzon, the latter wrote him a sharp letter, which has
reached us. It runs : "I think it right to inform you that I
have removed (i.e., suspended?) those Levites and priests from
their orders whom you have made against all order. It did
not become me to acknowledge those whom it did not
become you to ordain."
Having dislodged the enemy from Ripon, Wilfrid, now
priest and abbot, advanced to the attack of Lindisfarne.
Coleman " kept Easter with the Jews," therefore he was to be
" eliminated." Well, if there was anything uncanonical in
Coleman's position, the proper person to investigate this
was the Archbishop Deusdedit, who had then metropolitan
jurisdiction over all English Britain. He was not even con-
sulted in the matter. Wilfrid, having Alchfrid to back him up^
put King Oswy in motion, and what is called a Synod was
assembled at Whitby in 664. Deusdedit was not, of course,
present. " His absence is accounted for easily by the fact
that the whole scheme was got up by Wilfrid's zeal, taking
advantage of his friend Agilbert's visit to King Alclifrid, and
to himself at Ripon, and was managed accordingly on the
anti-Scottish side wholly by Agilbert and Wilfrid." ^^
Two accounts deserving notice have reached us concerning
what occurred at the Synod of Whitby. The first is by Eddius
or Eddi. He was a chanter at Canterbury, and was brought
12 Haddon and Stubbs' Council, III., 106.
372 tARLY IRISH HISTORY.
by Wilfrid to the north. He lived on the most intimate terms
with him, and accompanied him to Rome on his second appeal
after his second expulsion from his diocese in 704. After
Wilfrid's death he was requested by Acca, Bishop of Hexham,
and Tathbert, Abbot of Ripon, a kinsman of Wilfrid, to write
his life. His MS. was, of course, submitted to them, and
underwent the usual examination and censura of his monastic
superiors. It must, therefore, be regarded as a contemporary
official record of the Benedictine Order. It is brief and to the
point. Bede's account, years later, is much longer and less
reliable. Bede had himself written on the Paschal question,^^
and where he differs from Eddius the additions are, we think,
his own views. And though his feelings towards the Scots
are compassionate, appreciative, and sympathetic, still he, too,
was writing under the censura, and a few of his sentences are
so harsh that they seem to have been introduced to meet tlie
views of his superiors, and, as it were, balance the softer
judgments of Bede's kindly disposition. And this again leads
him to soften and tone down the harsher and more masterful
traits of Wilfrid's character, with which tendency the Benedic-
tine censors did not quarrel We shall therefore follow Eddius
as a general rule, condensing his narrative. He writes : —
One time, in the days when Coleman was Metropolitan Bishop of
York, in the reign of Oswy and his son AlchfiiJ, abbots and priests
and ecclf'siastics of every degree assembled in the monastery which is
called Whitby (Streaneshalgh) in the presence of the pious Hilda,
Mother Abbess, and of the kings, and two bishops, Coleman and Agil-
bert, to try which was the true method of keeping Easter — whether
according to the use of the Britons and Scots and all the northern region,
from the 11th moon coming the Lord's Day to the 20th, ^^ or wh<>ther
it was more correct to celebrate Easter Sundiy from the 15th moon to
the 21st.
This was the only issue to be tried, which may be re-stated
shortly thus : — Was Coleman justified in celebrating Easter on
the 14th moon when it fell on Sunday 1
In Ceolfrid's letter to Naiton, which was, it is now
generally thought, composed by Bede, the charge formulated
by Eddius is repeated, " that they (the Gauls) kept the paschal
feast from the 14th to the 20th day of the moon." It was not
" De Temp. Ration. Bede arranged a P;ischal Tablo from A.D. 532 to 1083
(c. 63). Ceolfrid's letter to Nait m is ^jjeiifrally admitted to be Bible's.
" The text is confused or iraporioct, but there is no doubt the 14th moon to
the 20th is correot.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 373
a question of cycles, except in so far as this use was disregarderl.
" I forebore," he adds, " to .send you those cycles of times to
come, because you asked only to be instructed concerniog the
principle or method (ratio) of the paschal season, and declared
that you had abundance of those Catholic cycles for finding
Easter." We may add that Naiton followed the Wilfrid
precedent and expelled the Columban monks from his kingdom.^^
There was no question as to a 19 years cycle or an 84 years
cycle, or any modification of them ; and there was no question
as to the form and shape of the correct tonsure. Wilfrid knew
perfectly well that a bishop could not be deposed or "eliminated"
on either question. St. Chrysostom had declared that no one
was ever punished or called to account for not keeping Easter
in this or that month. " Celebrating Easter with the Jews,"
as an unorthodox Quartodeciman, was, of course, a very
difi'erent matter.^^
The king presided seemingly over this august tribunal, and
called on his bishop to defend his use. Coleman said, with
undaunted courage, {intrepida mente) : —
Our fathers and those who went before them, inspired by the Holy
Spirit, as was Columba, ordained {sanxerunt) the celebration of Easter
on the 14th moon, (being) the Lord's Day, following the example of
John the Apostle and Evangelist, who reclined in the bosom of the
Lord, and was called the lover of the Lord. He celebrated Easter on
the 14th moon, and we, as his disciples, Polycarp and others, on this trust,
celebrate. Nor can we dare, nor do we wish, having regard for our
fathers, to change.
Coleman was quite right in saying that what was known
as the Johannine use was to celebrate on the 14th moon,
being Sunday, as well as on week-days, as we have already
stated.
Agilbert, a bishop from over sea, then directed Wilfrid —
^^ A.D. 717.— Expulsio famili» le (lona) trans dorsum Britanniae a Nectone rege
Tigernach. Bede V., c. 25.
^^It is said that the cycle then in use amongst the Scots was an 84 years cycle
or an 84 years (12) cycle, while the Dionysian cycle was a modification of the
Metonic 19 years cycle. Our readers, if curious, will find the matter discus.sed by
no means clearly by Dr. Maoarthy in the Introduction to the 4th vol. of the
Annals of Ulster. He gives a list (i.e. 21) of Easters according to both cycles for
21 years before 664. In this period on no occasion did Easterday fall on Sunday,
the 21st of March. He makes out that in the 21 years the King's Easter was 13
times earlier, and twice three weeks later, than the Queen's. Eddius does not
refer to this, which makes us doubt its accuracy, and Bede merely says. " It is
said to have happened in those times that Easter was kept twice in one year, and
that when the King, having ended his time of fasting, kept his Easter, the Queen
and her followers were still fasting and keeping Palm Sunday " (III. 26).
374 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
" a smooth-tongued and eloquent speaker " — to state in his own
language the Roman use. He said with humility : —
This matter was formerly wondrouslj investigated by our fathers
assembled in Nicaea, 318 in number, very holy and wise men, and they
decreed, amongst other judgments, a lunar cycle coming round again in
19 years. And they never showed that Eister was to be kept on the
14th moon. This is the use (ratio) of the Apostolical See and of almost
the whole world. And thus have our fathers adjudged after many
decrees : " Whosoever shall reject (condemnaverit) any of these let him be
anathema."
This was plainly a charge that Coleman had brought himself
within the anathema. And there can be no reasonable doubt
that it was on this ground he was compelled to leave the country
with his supporters. There was, as we have stated, no such
decision given at the Council of Nicsea. The language of the
late Dr. Macarthy in his preface to the fourth volume of the
Annals of Ulster" is scarcely too strong : " In the light of the
history of the Paschal question Wilfrid's farrago of fictitious
tradition and fabricated testimony {i.e., the epistle already
mentioned) can hardly fail to excite a smile. But it proved a
grim reality for the vanquished. How all the Irish were got
rid of on this pretext is beside the present question." The
eminent theologian, King Oswy, then put a conundrum to the
judicial and canonical tribunal. Smiling on Wilfrid, he put
the question to all (subridens preshytero interrogavit omnes
dicens) : " Tell me which is the greater, Columba or Peter the
Apostle, in the Kingdom of Heaven ? " All replied, " The
Lord decided this, who said, ' Thou art Peter, etc., and I give
you the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, etc' " (the well-known
text). Again, the King said, tersely, " (As) he is the door-keeper
and the key-keeper I will not enter the lists of controversy
against him, nor assent to others doing so, and I will not in my
lifetime contradict his decisions." This notable and comical
judgment was, as Dr. Macarthy says, a grim reality for the Gael.
After the expulsion of Coleman, Wilfrid, according to E Jdius,
was elected Bishop of Northumbria, i.e., of Bernicia and Deira.
Bede, however, says that Tuda, a correct Southern Irish bishop,
was appointed, and it seems probable that he was only in
temporary charge, or as is suggested by Plummer, that
the arrangement at first was that Tuda was to be Bishop
" Ann,. Ulst., Vol. IV., c. 67.
THE SECT OF THE SOOTS. 3/
o
of Bcrnicia and Wilfrid Bishop of Alclifrid's sub-kingdom,
Deira. Tuda died of the plague soon after, in 664, and
Wilfrid then became bishop of the whole kingdom from the
Humber to the Clyde. Eddius tells us that after his elec
tion he at once requested to be allowed to go to Gaul to be
consecrated, objecting to receive consecration from the British
bishops, " none of whom it is for me to accuse, though I know
truly that they are Quartodecimans, like the Britons and the
Scots, and were consecrated by those whom the Apostolic See
receives not into communion, nor those who share their opinions."
There was, he thus states most incorrectly, no bishop from
whom it would be safe to receive orders. But Deusdedit, the
Archbishop of Canterbury, was then a living man, so too, was
Boniface — both unobjectionable. He had another motive.
The King granted Wilfrid's request, got ready a ship, gave him
an escort, and a " multitude of money, and sent him forward in
honourable state." He was received in France with triumphal
honours. No less than twelve bishops, one of whom was Agil-
bert, assembled for his consecration at Compiegne. At the
ceremony he was lifted aloft on a golden chair by the twelve
bishops and carried into the oratorium, while they chanted
hymns and canticles. This ceremony took place probably in
664 or the beginning of 635. In the spring of 666 he sailed for
England with 120 attendants. He was driven by contrary
winds on the shore of the little kingdom of Sussex, where he and
his party were assailed by the natives, who were still hciithens.
He had a narrow escape with his life, and he lost six of his
companions. Thirteen years later he returned to this people
and preached the gospel to them. " Some were baptised
voluntarily, and some coerced by command of the King."^^
Wilfrid liked strong measures. No compulsion was ever used
by the Gael.ia
A story is told by Eddius which illustrates Wilfrid's
overbearing character and high-handed methods. After he
had been reinstated in the See of York, in the place of Chad,
he, on one occasion, having restored an infant miraculously to
^* Paganorum utriusqno sexus, qixidam voluntarie alii vero coacti regis
iniperio idolatriam deserentes. — Eddius c. 41.
^® Ah uunc proh pudor ! divinam lidem sufifragia terrena commendant,
inopsque virtutis suae Christus, dura ambitio nomine suo conciliatur, arguitur.
Deus non requirit coactara confessionera. Simplicitate quserendus est
voluntatis probitate letinendus. Hilary Contr. Auxent. II , 4.
I
876 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
life and baptized it, enjoined upon the mother to bring the
child when seven years old to him for the service of God, i.e.^
to be a monk. This the mother promised to do. But at the
instance of her wicked husband, who saw that the boy was
comely and was unwilling to part with him, she disregarded
her promise and fled. Thereupon the sergeant (Prsefectus) of
the Bishop made search for the boy, found him in hiding
among the Britons, forcibly carried him off and brought him
to the Bishop. The boy, who was called the "son of the
Bishop,'' lived as a monk at Ripou, where he died of the
plague.-**
Wilfrid's prolonged absence from his extensive diocese
seemed unaccountable to the Northumbrians, They prevailed
on Oswy to nominate Chad, Abbot of Lastingham, to be
Bishop. He was one of the twelve boys selected by Aidan, of
whom we have already made mention, and was afterwards brought
up in Ireland under monastic discipline. " A man of prayer,
study, humility, purity and voluntary poverty," he was
consecrated by Wini, Bishop of Winchester, with the
assistance of two British bishops, and then took possession of
his See, which comprised all Northumbria. Wilfrid, on arriving in
the north, acquiesced for some time, and retired to his
monastery at Ripon. Theodore made his entry as Archbishop
into Canterbury on May 27th, 669, and soon after made a
visitation of the north. During this be inquired into the
validity of Chad's election. " If you are pursuaded," said
Chad, " that I received the episcopate in an irregular manner,
I willingly retire from the office, for I never thought myself
worthy of it." He submitted at once to the jurisdiction and
judgment of Canterbury, as Coleman would have done
undoubtedly had that jurisdiction been appealed to. Wilfrid
then took possession of Northumbria, and soon afterwards
Theodore procured for Chad the bishopric of the Mercians.
Eddius tells us that Chad saw and admitted the error of his
ordination by the Quartodecimans to the bishopric of
another, and that the bishops " then ordained him fully
through all the ecclesiastical orders,'' ^^ to the Mercian
'0 Eddius c. 18.
^1 Per omnes gradus ecclesiasticos ad sedem predictam (t.«., Licitfelda,
Lichfield) plene eum ordmaverunt. — Edd. c. iv. Theodore's Penitential enjoins
that " one who has been ordained by heretics shall be ordained over again if
Winielesa."
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 377
bishopric of Lichfield (669). This leaves no room for doubt
that Eddius, Wilfrid, and the monks of Ripon regarded the
orders of Chad as invalid.
Wilfrid ruled the diocese of Norbhumbria from 669 to 678.
In the latter year Theodore divided this diocese and consecrated
three new bishops for the new dioceses. Wilfrid resisted and
appealed to Rome. The king, Egfrid, who had suceeded Oswy in
672, and — more important still — the reining queen, Ermemburga,
his second wife, were bitterly hostile to him. Etheldreda, Egfrid's
first wife, was the daughter of Anna, King of East Anglia, and
had been married first to Tonbert, a chieftain in Cambridge-
shire, who had died three years after the marriage. She was
then married to Egfrid, in whose house she lived for twelve
years. At the end of this period she expressed a great desire
to become a nun, and alleged that she had preserved her
virginity in both wedlocks. At her marriage with Egfrid, he
gave her as a wedding gift a territory at Hexham, twelve miles
long and six miles broad, good land, well situated,22 and
Wilfrid stated to Bede that Egfrid offered him large sums if he
would induce her to live with him as a real, not a nominal,
wife. Wilfrid, however, took sides with the lady. She
received the veil from him, and he received from her the
territory at Hexham. Egfrid then, during her lifetime,
married Ermemburga, the sister-in-law of Centwine, King of
Essex.
" At the instigation of the devil, who armed himself, as
usual, with the fragile sex," Eddius tells us, " like another
Jezabel, she (Ermemburga) poisoned the king's mind against
Wilfrid, dilating on his secular glory, his wealth, the multitude
of his monasteries, the magnitude of his edifices, the innumer-
able army of his retainers, equipped with regal arms and
attire. * Your whole kingdom is his bishopric,' she added,
and both induced Theodore, by gifts, to join them in robbing
Wilfrid of his property like footpads, and deprived him of his
bishopric." So far Eddius.
Allowing for the exaggerations of an angry woman, it is
still difiicult to reconcile Wilfrid's position with the Benedictine
^ Forty years after TTeavenfield (635), Etheldreda gave the land near Hexham,
twelve miles long and nearly six in breadth, to Wilfrid. It belonged to the queen,
as part of her dower, as it was part of the private property of the royal family of
Jxorthunibria. — Raine, Priory of Htxham, I., 14.
278 EARLY mrsTi history.
vow of individual poverty— if he ever took it, or was not
relieved of it, which is not stated.
This was Wilfrid's first expulsion. A second followed in
aftertime. On both occasions Church and State in Britain
were united against him, but in Rome his appeals were, on the
whole, successful.
He was not, however, able to secure at home the fruits of
his triumph, and after a term of imprisonment and many vicis-
situdes, he was finally, at the Synod on the Widd, near Ripon
(705), allowed to hold the small see of Hexham and the abbey
of Ripon. Four years later he was seized with a severe illness,
and consternation fell on the Benedictine monks lest he should
die before he had disposed of his monasteries and of his worldly
goods. They assembled in hot haste, and much prayer was
offered that he should be spared " until he had arranged for
their future ; uncZer abbots to be selected by himself (sub
prsepositis a se selectis)." He recovered, and this was done, and
he made his will. He designated his relative, Tathbert, to be
abbot of Ripon, He invited two abbots and eight brethren to
be present, and then ordered the custodian of his treasury
(gazophylacem) to open his treasure-chest, and to bring forth
all the gold and silver and precious stones and place them in
view of all. He divided them into four parts. One, the best,
he gave to the churches of St. Mary and St. Paul at Rome ;
the second to the poor; the third he divided between the abbots
of Ripon and Hexham, that by gifts they might secure (im-
petrare t) the friendship of kings and bishops ; and the fourth
he gave to those friends who had suffered in exile with him,
and to whom he had not already given estates (terras praediorum).
He died in 709 A.D., and was buried in the church of St. Peter
at Ripon. His epitaph records amongst his merits that, " he
corrected the celebration time of the Paschal festival according
to the correct dogma of the Catholic canon which the Fathers
ordained." 22 This clearly refers to the supposed canon of
Nicsea which Wilfrid relied on at Whitby. It is noteworthy
that Bede does not mention this canon in the letter of Ceolfrid
to Naiton, though he was well acquainted with the works of
Dionysius Exiguus. He does represent Wilfrid at Whitby as
-^ Paschalis qui etiara sollemnia tempora cursus Catholici ad justnm corr^xit
»logma cauonis quein statuere patres i.e. the Nicaan fathers. — H. E., V., c. 19.
THE SECT OF THE SCOTS. 379
referring to " decrees of the Apostolic See and of the Universal
Church," in a vague manner. (11. , c. 25).
The evils following from this state of religious anarchy were
such as might be expected. As wo pass from the pure and
bracing spirituality of the Columban monks we quickly perceive
that we are in an atmosphere laden with the languorous odours
of wealth and worldliness, of ambitious rivalries and moral
disorder, Bede's letter to Egbert, Archbishop of York, written
towards the close of his life (734), presents a dark picture of
degeneracy. He writes :—
It ia commonly reported that certain bishop < seek those -who are
given up to revelling, etc., drunkenness, etc., and the allurements of
loose living. There are many villages and cells situated in accessible
mountains never visited by the bishops to whom they pay tribute, and
without any teacher whatsoever. "When a bishop, stimulated by the
love of money, has taken upon himself the prelacy over a greater
number of people than he can visit in a year, he has the title, but not
the functions, of a bishop. More bishops are necessary. To maintain
such, let the numberless places which have the name of monasteries,
but nothing of the monastic mode of life, be transferred from the
purposes of luxury to those of chastity, from vanity to temperance, from
excess and gluttony to continence and piety of heart. Again, laics
found monasteries and fill the cells with expelled monks, and found
nunneries and place their wives over them, and get laymen tonsured
and made abbots, and in both these the greatest disorder prevails. So
man}' have got into their power places of this kind under the name of
monasteries that there is no place for the sons of the nobility or veteran
soldiers to occupy, and accordingly, when they arrive at the years of
puberty they live in idleness and unmarried, without any purpose of
continence, and give themselves up to luxury and fornication, and do
not even abstain from the virgins consecrated to God.
Quid plura f
Coleman was happily spared the anguish of witnessing the
blight which had fallen on the vineyard in which durins thirty
years the sons of Columba had been gathering a rich vintage
for the Lord. From Whitby he went to Holy Isle and
collected his treasures to take back with him to the Mother
Church at Zona. These consisted of the bones of his predecessor,
the sainted Aidan. Part he left with the brethren there at
their earnest entreaty, part he put in his wallet, and with his
bundle on his shoulder, like many an evicted Gael since his day,
he tramped across Alba with a sore heart, not, however, bewail-
ing his own fate, but grieving that the flock which he had loved,
and for which he would gladly have laid down his life, was
now left without its shepherd, and that the fold was left
unguarded for the intruder to leap into it.
[380 ]
CHAPTER XXVI.
THE EMERALD RIXG.
AT the beginning of the eleventh century two "world policies"
met in conflict which, with some exaggeration of the
outlines to make the objects clearer, may be roughly described
as follows : — The first was an attempt on the part of the
Emperor, in addition to his temporal power as head of the
Holy Roman Empire, to control the exercise of the spiritual
power and make the Pope an adjunct of the German Chancery,
whose principal function was to be the excommunication of
the Emperor's foreign and domestic enemies. The second
was a claim on the part of the Pope, in addition to his spiritual
power, to be the temporal owner of the Western Empire from
the Adriatic to St. George's Channel, by virtue of a donation
from Constantino the Great to Pope Sylvester. This donation
is now universally admitted to be a forgery attributable to the
first half of the eighth century, but was universally
accepted by the orthodox, even by jurists, as genuine, until it
was proved to be spurious by the criticism of Laurentius Valla
and others in the fifteenth century. It is a long, rambling
document. It recites that Constantine was afflicted with
leprosy, and that the physicians having failed to cure him, the
priests of the Capitol came to him, saying, " That a font should
be made on the Capitol and that he should fill it with the
blood of innocent infants, and that if he bathed in it while it
was warm he might be cleansed ; that when very many innocent
children had been brought together, and the priests wished
them to be slaughtered, he, perceiving the tears of the motheis,
abhorred the deed and restored the children to their mothers,
with gifts." The following night the Apostles, St. Peter and
St. Paul, appeared to him and told him to go and receive the
teaching of Pope Sylvester, and that in the waters of baptism
he would be cleansed of his leprosy. This he did and was
cleansed, and then perceiving, " that where the supremacy
of priests and the head of the Christian religion had been
THE EMERALD RING. 381
established by a Heavenly Father it was not just that there
an earthly raler should have jurisdiction," he resolved to
transfer his empire and the seat of his power to the Eist, and
make Byzantium his capital. He then granted to Pope Sylvester,
and his successors, his palace (i.e., the Lateran), " the city of
Kome and all the provinces, districts, and cities of Italy, and
of the Western regions. And he conjured all the people in the
whole world then, and in all times previously, subject to his
rule, under pain of damnation, not to oppose or disregard this
grant in any way."
In an earlier part of the donation we find the famous
"Islands Clause," which we give textually, omitting some
particulars : —
Meanwhile ; we wish all the people of all the races and nations
throughout tlie whole world to know that we have constructed within
our Lateran Palace to the same Saviour, our Lord God, Jesu^ Christ, a
Church, with a baptistery, from the foundations. And know that we
have carried on our shoulders, from its foundation, twelve baskets
weighted with earth, according to the number of the twelve apostles.
We have also constructed the churches of SS. Peter and Paul, chief of
the apostles. . . . And on these churches, for the providing of
lights, we have conferred estates (from our) possessions, and have
enriched them with many things, and bestowed upon them our bounty,
by the solemnities of our impeiial decrees, as well in the east as in the
west, and even in the northern and southern region, to wit, in India,
Greece, Asia, Thrace, Africa, and Italy, and in divers islands, on this
condition, that all should be administered by our most blessed father.
Pope Sylvester, and his successors.^
It is to the " Islands Clause " that John of Salisbury mani-
festly refers in the extracts which we shall give, after stating
a few facts about him. He was born near Salisbury, made his
studies in France for ten or twelve years, and was present at
the Coundl held at Rheims by Eugenius III. in the spring of
^ Interea nosse volumus omnem populum universarum gentium per totam
orbem terrarura construxisse nos intra palatium nostrum Lateranense eidem
Salvatori nostro Domino Deo Jesu Christo ecclesiam de fundamentis, secundum
numerum duodecim apostolorum cofinos terra* onustos propriis asportasse humeris
.... Construximus etiam ecclesias beatorum Petri et Pauli principum aposto-
lorum .... quibus pro concinnatione luminariorum possessionum prtedia
contulimus, et rebus diversis eas ditavimus et per nostras jussionura imperialiuni
saeras, tam in oriente quam in occidente vel etiam in septentrionali et meridiana
plaga, videlicet in India, Graseia, Asia, Thracia, Africa, et Italia, vel diversis
insulis, nostram largitatem eis concessimus, ea prorsus ratione ut per manus
beatissimi patris nostri Sylvestri pontificis successorumque ejus omnia disponautur.
— Condituinm Constantiui. Zeujier (Ed. 1888), p. 55.
The old home of the Laterani had passed to Fausta, the daughter of the
Emperor Maximian, and she brouglit it to Constantine on her marriage witli him,
A.D. .307. Constantine gave it to Melchiades, and afterwards confirmed the grant
to Sylvester, who resided there. Withiu the precincts Constantine and Sylvester
built the vast basilica known as the " Lateran," and dedicated to the Saviour.
382 EARLY IRISH HISTORY,
114S. It would appear that after the Council was over he
attended the Pope to Brescia and then went on to Boine. He
returned to England in 1150 and was introduced to Archbishop
Theobald by St. Bernard, the Hildebrand of the 12th century.
St. Bernard wrote a strongly- worded letter, recommendincr
him " a friend of mine and of my friends " to the Archbishop,
and requesting that provision should be made for him decently,
nay honourably and promptly, as he did not know where to
turn ; for he was of good report, which he had deserved by his
life and learning. " This I know, not from men who use
words lightly, but from my own (spiritual) sons who are with
me, and whose words I believe as I would my own eyes." ^
The Archbishop, who, owing to the long absences of Henry II.
in France, had a principal share in the government of the
country, took him into his service and he was employed in
important business abroad. He tells us that between 1150 and
1159 he crossed the Alps ten times. He was with Eugenius
III. at Ferrentino from November, 1150, to J uno, 1151, and again
in May, 1152; and between November, 1155, and June, 1156,
he spent three months with Adrian IV. at Benevento.^
Adrian died on September 1st, 1159, at Anagni, and the news
of his death reached John shortly afterwards and caused him
poignant grief. " Our lord, Pope Adrian, is dead," he wrote
in the Metalogicus — a work on which he was then engaged.
" His death will be wept by all good men, but by none more
than by myself. Omnibus ille bonis flebilis occidit, aed nulli
flebilior quam mihi. He had his mother and uterine brother,
bat he loved me with closer affection, for he confessed in public
and in private that he loved me above all mortals. Such was
his opinion of me that when opportunity offered he used to
delight in laying bare to me his inmost thoughts, and after he
became Roman Pontiff he was glad to have me as a guest at
his own table, and would have me, against my wish, to drink
out of the same cup and eat out of the same dish. At my
solicitation he gave and granted Hibernia to Henry II., the
illustrious King of England, to hold by hereditary right, as his
letter which (is extant) to this day testifies. For all islands, of
ancient right, according to the donation of Constantine, are
9 St. Bernard, Letter 3G1. Migae, vol. 182, p. 502. Theobald had been abbot
of Bee.
" Jaffe IL, 113, 120.
THE EMERALD RING. "3^3
said to belong to the Roman Church, which he founded and
endowed (i.e., St. Peter's and St. Paul's). He sent also by me
a rint^ of gold, with the best of emeralds set therein, wherewith
the investiture might be made for his governorship of Ireland,
and that same ring was ordered to be, and is still, in the public
treasury of the king. If I were to state in detail its varied
excellence, this one topic would supply matter for a volume." *
It will be observed that he says " at ray solicitation," not at
the request of Henry II., and that he is guarded in his reference
to the Donation. He uses the words : " are said to belong "
(dicuntur). The genuineness of the Donation was openly
challenged in Rome at this time by the republicans or revolu-
tionaries there. Wetzel wrote to the Emperor that the Donation
was a lie, a heretical fable, and so found out that common
workmen and old women '*' shut up even the most learned on the
point."* The confidence of the orthodox in the genuineness oi
the Donation was, however, probably increased on finding it
assailed by men who called them heretics. But it is difficult to
understand how anybody could suppose that the Donation,
even if it was genuine, conveyed the sovereignty of any island,
when it deals explicitly with estates and things in the islands,
and not with the islands themselves ; or how, in the case of
Ireland, Constantine could give away what he never possessed.
However, Urban II., in a Bull, dated June 3rd, 1091, asserted
that by the Privilegium of Constantine " all the islands in
the Wed were bestowed on St. Peter and his successors in
proprietary right, especially those situate about Italy. "^
* Ad proces meaa illustri Rogi Anglorum Henrico Secundo concessit et dedifc
{i.e., Adrianua) Iliberniam jure herwlitario possideudara, sicut littera; ipsius
testautur in hodiernum diem. Nam omnes insula; de juie antique ex donatione
Constantini qui earn fundavit ot dotavit dicuntui' ad Romanani eeclesiam pertincru.
Annulum quoque per me transmisit aureum sniaragdo optimo decoratum quo
tieret investitura juris in gerenda Hibernia, idemque adhuc annulus in curiali
archio publico custodiri jussus est.— Giles, Vol. V., 205 ; Lib. IV., c. 42. The
Metalogicua was coniplete<l in ll.o9, or in 1160 at the latest, and the passage cited
is found in all tho MSS. In 1159 Henry and Louis VII. were engaged in hostilities
and opposing each other near Toulouse, to which Henry laid claim. There is a
note by Pagi, which indicates that there was some estrangement between Adrian
and his family. Giraldus, who wrote in 1174 or 1175, says :— " The same Popo
(i.e., Adrian IV.) sent by him (i.e., John of Salisbury) to the King of England a
gold ring in symbol of investiture (inve^iiturce in signum), which was at onco
deposited in the treasury at Winchester." — Expug. Hih., Rolls series, vol. v., 314.
* " Mendacium illud et fabula herctica ita detecta est ut mercenarii et mulier-
culffi etiam docti.ssimos super hoc concludunt." — Wetzel to Frederic Barbarosaa
(1152^ Ep. 384. Martene II.
* "Constantini privileglo in jus propriiua beato Pctro ejusque successoribus
occidentales omnes insuhTC donatie sunt maxiiue qu£e circa Italiaj oram habeutur."
— Rocchi Firri, Lipariemli Eccl. Notitia, vol. viii. Lib. 3.
SS4 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Assuming that the ownership of Ireland was, as, no doubt
he believed, in the Pope's gift, the investiture by the delivery
of the symbolical ring was sufficient. Under the feudal system
the ownership of land was transferred by the visible transfer of
portion of the soil (by " rod and twig,") or some symbolical
form of delivery. This constituted a solemn investiture which,
while the art of writing was rare, supplied the only evidence of
the transaction, and which, though written evidence was after-
wards required by the statute, still continued to be the essence
of the transfer. This was also the law in Italy at this period,
where the feudal system prevailed. Evidence to this effect is
furnished by the Gartula of the Countess Matilda of Tuscany
(1102) which is commonly, but quite erroneously, referred to as
a " will." After recitinof a donation for the relief of her soul
and the souls of her parents, made in the Church of the Holy
Cross at the Lateran to the Church of Rome by the hand of
Gregory VII,, which donation was not forthcoming, it continues :
'' To the same Church of Rome, by the hands of Barnardus,
Cardinal Legate, all my possessions, which I now have, or may
hereafter own, on either side of the mountain (^Apenninesy I
give and confirm from this day (15 Kal. Dec. 1102) by this
Cartula, and, besides, by a small ssvord, a knotty rod, a glove,
a basket of earth, and the branch of a tree,^ and I have evicted
myself, absconded, and gone away from there, and left the same
to be held on behalf of the Church. I have lifted the parch-
ment and the inkhorn from off the ground, and delivered the
pages to the notary, Guido, and requested him to engross it."
The names of witnesses follow, and Guido adds : " I, after
deliver^', engrossed the Cartula, and delivered it (to the
Cardinal Legate)." This was at Canossa, in 1102.
There were also many other forms of investiture, as by a
ring, a standard, a flag, a sword, etc., as may be seen in
Du Cange, under Investitura. John of Salisbury expressly
states that in the case of Henry II. the investiture was to be
" This is an important statement. The Cartula dealt with vast possessions,
covering, according to some, an area as large as Ireland. The document was,
no doubt, destroj'ed during the anarchy and bloodshed that reia;ned in Rome
M-ith periodical recurrence, during the 11th and l'2th centuries. In this way also
the scripts relating to Ireland were, we may assume, destroyed. Theiner found
in the Papal archives none earlier than the 13th century.
* "Insuper per cultellum, festucara nodatam, guantonem, guvassonera terra?
atque ramum artioris, et me exinde foras expuli, guarpivi et absentem mo feci, pt
a parte ecclesi;e haoendum roliiiui." — Cartula Mathilda;. Monmn. Dom. Pontif.
Cennius II„ 2c>S.
THE EMERALD RINQ. 385
made by the delivery of a ring, and that the ring was accepted
by Henry and deposited in the public treasury.
The letter referred to by John of Salisbury was a letter of
investiture, and not, as is maintained by many authors, the
Privilegium Laudabiliter . The form used with the Normans of
Italy commenced thus:— "I Gregory, Pope, invest you, Duke
Robert, with the land," etc.^ With this went the oath of fealty
(fidelitatem observabo), which included a promise not to
divulge the Pope's secrets to his damage, and to aid and
defend the papacy and its temporal possessions to the utmost
of his power (pro posse meo) against all men. There was also
a promise to pay a yearly rent, which in the case of Robert was
fixed at 12 denarii of the money of Pavia, for every yoke of
oxen.^"*
Henry's title was thus complete on the delivery and accept-
ance of the ring and the letter. The latter contained, no
doubt, a suitable reference to the Peter's pence which were to
be paid when Dominus Henry entered into possession. As we
shall see, the confirmation by Alexander III. explicitly says so.
What was the motive of Adrian's Donation ? The sugges-
tion that Nicholas Breakspear (Adrian IV.) made it because he
was an Englishman, may be dismissed at once. Though born
in England, he was probably a Northman by descent. He is
said " to have fetcht his name from Breaspere, a place in
Middlesex." He was selected to be Papal Legate to Norway
and Sweden, and he wrote a Catechism for them in the
vernacular, all which points to a northern parentage, and
an early acquaintance with the language. But whether Anglo-
Saxon or Dane, he had certainly no love for the Francii, who
since the fatal day of Hastings had tyrannized over the
conquered with a cruelty and oppression far worse than was
known in Ireland until the confiscations of Mary, and the
exterminations of Elizabeth.
John of Salisbury and his friends wished, no doubt, to
conciliate the friendship of Henry by the Donation ; but, as we
shall show in the proper place, Henry was not then in a
position to undertake a great military expedition like the
invasion of Ireland, and there is no reliable evidence that he
solicited a license for that purpose from Pope Adrian.
• '* Ego, Gregorkis, Papa, investi "» te, Roberte dux, de terra," etc.
" Jaffe, Rer Germ. II. 426.
2C
386 EARLY IPwISH HISTORY.
The motive for the gift must be sought in the Welt politik
of the Roman curia. It was part of the policy of Hildebrand
to raise in the West of Europe a power to balance that of the
German Emperors ; and this, not from worldly ambition to
exalt the temporal greatness of the Church, but to secure its
spiritual independence. In furtherance of this policy he allied
himself with the Normans of Italy, and took William, Duke of
Normandy, under his patronage. He, too, received a gold ring
and a banner from the Pope,^^ and claimed to have a mission
for reforming the Church. William and Lanfranc represented
the invasion of England as designed for the spiritual welfare of
the country.^^
" A land," writes Freeman, " which had not lost its ancient
character of the Isle of Saints (England) ; a land which had so
lately boasted of a King like Edward, and an Earl like Leofric ;
a land which was still illustrated by the virtues of the holy
Wulfstan ; a land whose earls and bishops, and sons of every
degree, pressed year after year to offer at the tombs of the
apostles ; a land like this was branded as a land which needed
to be gathered again into the true fold." i'
It is related in the Chronicles of St. Alban's that after the
Conquest William asked of the monks how it was that it was
effected so easily. They made answer that it was owing to
the support of the monasteries — that these all declared for him.
William, however, left Hildebrand in the lurch. He would
give nothing but the old-time contribution of Peter's Pence.
When Hubert, the Pope's Legate, came to England, and
demanded that William should take the oath of fealty, William
refused, without, however, denying the overlordship claimed
by the Pontiff. He affirmed that he had not promised to, and
would not, take the oath.^* On another occasion Hildebrand
*^ Un gonfannon e un and
Mult precios e riche et bel. —
Roman de Rose, 11452.
*^ The Tictors of Civitella, Richard of Aversa and Robert Guiscard, both
brave, faithless, unscrupulous, blood-stained condottieri, mighty robbers, un-
scathed by the many denunciations of the Church, appeared before Nicholas If. at
Melfi, where the Pope held a Council in 1069. They received their conquests,
with the exception of Benevento, as fiefs of the Holy See. The rights of the
despoiled rulers, and of the people were as little regarded as the rights of the
German Emperor. The Normans took the oath of vassalage : — " Fidelis ero S. R.
ecclesis et tibi Dom, meo Nicholae." — Gregorovius — Hint. Cit. of Home, Vol IV.
part ii., 121.
»3 Freeman III., 284.
1* Fidelitatem facere nolui nee volo, quia nee ego promisi, nee antecessores
meos antecessoribus tuis id fecisse comperio. — Ep. Lanfranc X. Freeman, IV., 433.
THE EMERALD RING. 387
wrote :— " You know, most excellent son, how sincerely I loved
you before I reached the Papal dignity, and also how active I
proved rayseK in your business, especially with what zeal I
laboured that you might rise to the kingship. For which
I incurred grave ill repute (infamiam) from my brothers
(cardinals), who murmured at my exerting myself with such
predilection for the perpetration of such bloodshed." ^^
According to the Chronicler, if William had lived two
years longer he would have conquered Ireland " without
weapons." ^^ Giraldus has a story that William Ruf us, looking
from the headland of St. David's across to Ireland, threatened
to assemble a great fleet and conquer it. He adds that when
this threat reached King Muirchertach he asked simply, " Did
he say, ' With the help of God' ? " " The conquest of Ireland,"
says Goldwin Smith, " was simply the sequel of the conquest
of England." "
In 1219 the King of Man surrendered the island to tho
Pope and was re-invested with it, to hold as a fief, and the
investiture was made with a ring sent for that purpose. It is
stated that claims were made by the Pope to be acknowledged
as over-lord of Scotland and Ireland.^^ Roderick, the King of
Connacht, was, we are assured, offered six wives (in succession,
of course) if he would become the Pope's liegeman ! ^*
It has been alleged that Donncadh, the son of Brian, when,
after his deposition, he was an exile in Rome, transferred the
lordship of Ireland to the Pope by delivering to him the crown
and regalia of the High King. This is,, of course, an absurd
fiction, but it may have been invented and put in circulation
by persons who did not know that the Ard Righ in Erin had
only a life estate and could not forgive food rents much less
transfer a kingdom. Many such serviceable fables were invented
» Ep. Greg. VII. Bosquet, XIV., 648. Freeman, III., 319.
1^ Ond gif he moste ha gyt twa year libtan he haefde Yrlande mid his waer-
scipe gewunnon, ond wid-utan aelcon waepon. — Chr on. Petit., 1087. "And if he
might have yet two years lived he had Ireland with his war ships (?) won without
any weapon." Stevenson translates " waerscipe" by "valour," Earle by "wary
negotiation." We suggest " war ships," i.e., he would only have to sail over and
take possession. — Earle, Saxon Chron., pp. 222, 355. It. Camb. II., 7 (Rolls S.
VI., 109). As to William Rufus, see Giraldus Hiner Kamb II., c. I. Rolls Series
Vol. 6 p. 109.
" Ireland, p. 45.
18 Raynaldi. Amiales Eccl. for 1819, Vol. XIII., p. 297.
1^ " The Pope had offered right over Erin to himself and his seed after him for
ever, and six married wives, provided that he desisted from the sin of the women
thenceforward. But Ruaidhri did not accept this." Ann. of Loch Ce, £. S. I. 315
(A.D. i233J.
888 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
to bolster up the forged donation of Constantine. " Accus-
tomed," writes Gregorovius, " to harried proprietors surrender-
ing their free property, to take it back as a fief of the Church,
the Church sought to extend these legal relations, to expand
these domains into kingdoms, and to render them all tributary
to herself. These titles were innumerable and often curious.
Gregory VII. claimed feudal supremacy over Bohemia because
Alexander II. had conceded the use of a mitre to Duke Wratis-
law ; over Russia because the fugitive prince of Novgorod had
visited the tomb of St. Peter and had offered him his country
as a fief ; over Hungary because Henry III. had placed the
lance and crown of that conquered country as votive offerings
in St. Peter's." 20
We must now turn to the state of affairs in Erin. Mael-
seachlainn, who died in 1022 A.D., isjustly regarded as the last
Ard-Righ of Erin. Subsequently, several of the provincial
kings were styled Ard-Righ by their partisans, but were syled
by the chroniclers |ii co p|;epAb|\A (fereshowra), i.e., "kings with
gainsaying^" The predominant power passed from province to
province making the circuit of Erin, and would, no doubt, in
the end, as in other countries, and at no distant date, have
become fixed in a paramount dynasty if there had been no
ioreign intervention. Meanwhile, there were the usual intestine
wars that precede and accompany the birth-throes of a nation.
Notwithstanding all this, Ireland, we affirm, and hope to prove,
was, in comparison with the rest of Europe, and particularly
with Italy, an oasis of purity, piety, and progress.
After Maelseachlainn there was, according to some autho-
rities, an interregnum, during which the principal management
of affairs was vested in two regents — as we may style them —
Cuan O'Lochain, the poet, and Corcoran, the cleric. This
lasted about four years, and Donncadh MacBrian, the son of
Brian Boru, then became overlord of all Erin, except Ulster.
He received the hostages of Ossory, Leinster, Meath, and
Connacht. He was deposed in 1064, and his nephew, Turlough,
became King of Munster. This he effected through the aid of
Diarmuid Machnambo, King of Leinster. Diarmuid became
the most powerful ruler in the island, but he fell in battle
against Conchobar, son of Maelseachlain, in 1072. Turlough
O' Brian then regained the position his uncle, Donncadh, had
* Gregorovius, Rome, vol. IV., Part I., 176. See the authorities there cited.
THE EMERALD RING. 389
held, and some claim that he obtained the submission of
Ulster. He died in 1086, and was succeeded by his son,
Muirchertach.
Three years before, in 1083, Domhnall Ua Lochlainn became
King of Aileach. He was of the race of Niall of the Nine
Hostages, descended from Domhnall, brother of that Niall who
was Ard-Righ, and died in 919. Between these now lay the
contest for the overlordship. They fought with varying for-
tunes. 0' Lochlainn was at one time acknowledged king for a
few months, and O'Brian made a triumphal circuit of Erin soon
after. Finally O'Brian died in 1119 and O'Lochlainn in 1121,
leaving the contest undecided. But the forces of the O'Brians
were, seemingly, exhausted. After an interval of fifteen years
the contest was renewed again, this time between the O'Conors
of Connacht and the O'Lochlainns of Aileach. Turlough
O'Conor leading the men of Connacht, and aided by the men of
Leinster, under Diarmaid MacMurcadha, crushed the Munster
men at Moin Mor, near Emly, in Tipperary. But being attacked
in the same year by Muirchertach Ua Lochlainn, he was
forced to give him hostages. He renewed the struggle, how-
ever, the following year, and maintained it with great tenacity
until his death, in 1056, when he was succeeded by his son,
Ruadhri, or Roderick. The latter was not then in a position
to establish his claim to the shadowy overlordship. Muirchertach
Ua Lochlainn stood forth as a rival claimant, and both parties
prepared to gather around them, by persuasion or force, the
minor chieftains and their fighting men. Omitting minor
operations O'Conor sailed down the Shannon and made a
partition of Munster between O'Brian and Macarthy. He
established a firm alliance with Tighernan O'Ruairc, who ruled
over Cavan, Lei trim, and Longford. On his side O'Lochlainn
was equally active. Immediately after the death of Turlough
he invaded Ulidia and took away choice hostages. He
then marched south and took the hostages of Leinster frorrf
Diarmaid Mac Murcadha in return for giving him the whole
province. Diarmaid thenceforth stood firmly by him in his
contest with O'Conor. O'Lochlainn next marched with the
men of Oirghiall into Ossory, and received the submission of
the chieftains there. The following year he attended the
great ceremony at the consecration of Mellifont, when he gave
eight score co^\'s and sixty ounces of gold to the Lord and to
390 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
the clergy. Magraidin, the continuator of Tigernach, states that
Tighernan Ua Ruairc and Dearbforgaill were both present on
that occasion, when the latter gave, as already stated, sixty
ounces of gold and other valuable presents. The Annals of
Ulster state that Tighernan Ua Ruairc was also present,
and it may, we think, be fairly assumed that he and Dearbforgaill
were not then living apart, though the contrary is often stated.
In 1159 O'Lochlainn marched into Meath, and put Donncadh
Ua Maelseachlainn in full kingship of it from the Shannon to
the sea. After this O'Conor mustered all his forces and
advanced to attack him. He was joined by strong battalions
from Munster. Tighernan Ua Ruairc brought the O'Ruaircs,
O'Reillys, and O'Farrels from Leitrim, Cavan, and Longford.
O'Conor marched to Ardee, the historic fighting ground of
Cuchulainn. There he was met by Ua Lochlainn at the head
of the Cinel Eogain, the Cinel Conaill, the Oirghialla, and the
Ulidians. A battle rout was inflicted on O'Conor. The six
battalions of Connacht and Ua Ruairc were overthrown, and
the two battalions from Munster " were dreadfully slaughtered."
O'Lochlainn then led his victorious army — the Cinel Eogain,
the Cinel Conaill, the Ulidians, and the Oirghialla — into
Connacht, but had to return " without peace and without
hostages." O'Conor was, however, not crushed. He continued
the struggle with stubborn pertinacity. The next year, 1160.
he made a hosting into Teffia, sailed down the Shannon, and
took hostages from the Dal Cais. Then he went to meet
O'Lochlainn at Eas Ruaidh with a view to making peace ; but
they could not come to an agreement. In 1161 O'Conor, with
Tighernan Ua Ruairc, invaded Meath, and took hostages from
the Ui Faclain and the Ui Failghe, but was himself obliged to
give hostages to O'Lochlainn. In 1165 he made a hosting
into Desmond, and took hostages from MacCarthy. At this
time, notwithstanding his having given hostages to O'Lochlainn,
he seems to have had a nominal suzerainty over Desmond,
Thomond, Meath, and BrefFni. The following year brought
the downfall and death of his rival. O'Lochlainn had treacher-
ously blinded Eocaid, the son of Donnsluibhe, King of Ulidia,
against the guarantee of Ua Cearbhail, the King of Oirghialla,
and " after dishonouring the co-arb of Patrick and the staff of
Jesus, and the co-arb of Columba, and the Gospel of St. Martin
and many clergy, besides Ua Cearbhail and the Oirghialla."
THE EMERALD RING, 391
The UHdians rose against him, and O'Conor led the Connacht
men and Ua Ruairc's men into Tyrone. A battle was fought
at Leiter Luinn, near Newtown Hamilton, in Armagh, and
O'Lochlainn was slain, O'Conor then marched to Ath Cliath
with Ua Ruairc and Maelseachlainn and their forces. There
" he was inaugurated king as honourably as any king of the
Gael was ever inaugurated, and he presented their ' retainers '
to the foreigners, in many cows, for he levied four thousand
cows on the men of Erin for them."
O'Conor then received the submission and hostages of the
Oirghialla and other chieftains, and gave them "retainers."
Next he marched against Diarmaid MacMurchada, who advanced
against him and gave him battle, but was defeated.
It was on this occasion, in our judgment, that Diarmuid
fled from the kingdom, was deposed, and his kinsman, Mur-
chadh, the son of Murchada, set up by O'Conor in his stead.^^
There is an entry in the Book of Leinster — evidently of con-
temporary date — which refers to this event. It runs as follows : —
" Wirra, wirra (ttluipe) 'tis a great deed that has been done this
day, the Kalends of August, viz., Diarmuid, the son of Donn-
cadh MacMurchada, King of Leinster and of the foreigners, to
have been banished over the sea (eastwards) by the men of
Erin. Oh, Holy Trinity! uch ! uch ! What shall I do?"
This entry was, we suggest, made by, or at the dictation of, Aedh
MacCrimthainn. He had been tutor of Diarmaid, and was now
Ferleighinn at Ferns. It was by him, we think, or under his
direction, that the Book of Leinster was compiled, and not, as
O'Curry thought, by Finn, Bishop of Kildare, who died in
1160 A.D. There is an interesting letter from the latter copied
into the Book of Leinster. It runs : — " Life and health from
Finn, Bishop, (i.e. of Kildare) to Aedh MacCrimthainn,
Ferleighinn of the chief king of Leth Mogha, and co-arb of
Colum MacCrimthainn, and chief historian of Leinster in
wisdom, and knowledge, and cultivation of books, and scienc3,
and learning. And let the conclusion of this history be written
for me by thee. 0 acute Aedh, thou possessor of the sparkling
intellect. . . ^ Let Mac Lonain's book of poems be given
-^ The accounts in onr Annals are confused by the introduction of a separate
invasion en revanche by O'Ruairc. We follow Magraidin's account up to tho
battle (continuation of Tigernach, Rev. Celt., 18 p. 168). The entry in the Boole of
Leinster, to be presently mentioned, says he was banished, not by Ua Ruairc but
by the men of Erin, i.e., O'Conor's army.
392 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
to me that we may find out the sense of the poems that are in
it."22
The grief of Aedh, if we are right in our surmise, was not
destined to be of long duration. Glad tidings were coming to
him from over sea. Diarmaid fled to the Court of Henry II.,
who was then in Acquitaine. He was cordially received, and
obtained from the King Letters Patent authorising his subjects
in every part of his dominions to aid him in recovering his
kingdom. He further obtained — what was, perhaps, scarcely of
less importance, what is commonly known as the Bull
Laudabiliter. The document was, in our judgment, composed
or issued at this time. We shall state in full detail our
view respecting it in our next chapter. Here let us give,
with our translation, the text from the Book of Leinster,
hitherto unpublished, and, with one exception,^^ unnoticed
in the voluminous works and treatises on this subject.^*
The prefatory lines are, we suggest, from Aedh MacCrim-
thainn, who probably survived his pupil. The date of his
death is not known.
[Laudabiliter.]
Ah, men of the faith of the world how beautiful !
When over the cold sea in ships Zephyrus wafts glad tidings
(literally presents).
[A Bull granted to the King of the English on the collation (i.e. grant)
of Hibernia, in which nothing is taken away from. the. rights of the
Irish, as appears hy the toords of the textJ\
Adrian, bishop, servant of the servants of God, to our well-beloved
son in Christ, the illustrious King of the English, health and apostolical
benediction. Laudably and profitably enough does your magnificence
think of winning a glorious name on earth and heaping up the reward
of eternal happiness in heaven while you purpose like a prince (truly)
Catholic to extend the bounds of the Church, to proclaim to a rude and
untaught people the truth of the Christian faith, and to root out
nurseries of vice from the field of the Lord, and for doing this with
greater propriety you ask the advice and support of the Holy See. In
which matter we are confident your progress will be more successful
with God's help, in proportion as you proceed with loftier purpose and
^ LL. Facsimile, lower margin, p. 228. Colum MacCrimtliainn was the
founder of the Abbey of Tir-fla-j;ias in Tipperary. The entry is written under
the story of Tadg, the son of Cian, which is, perhaps, the story referred to. See
Todd, War of the Gad, X.
^' Boichorst refers to the LL. casually in a note.
^■* As regards the pagination of the Book of LeinMer it is to be noted that the
original book ends on page 354. From 3.55 to 376 inclusive there is a blank. From
377 to the last page, 411, is moJern— about 300 years old. Facsimile LL. Intro-
duction.
THE EMERALD RING. 3^3
greater discretion, because those (projects) usually have a happy end
and issue which have their beginning in ardour for the faith and love
of religion. Truly there is no doubt, as you freely (voluntas tua) recog-
nize, that Hi hernia and all islands on which Christ, the Sun of Justice,
has shone, which have I'eceived the teachings of the Christian faith,
belong to the "jus" of the blessed apostle Peter and the Holy Roman
Church. Hence we have the greater pleasure in planting in them a
nursery of the faith and seed pleasing to God, as conscience tells us,
and we see that this is strictly demanded of us. Since you intimate to
us, well-beloved son in Christ, that you wish to enter the island of
Hibemia to subject that people to laws and root out the nurseries of
vice from it, and are willing to pay from each house one denarius
annually as cess to blessed Peter, and to preserve the rights of the
Church of that land unimpaired and inviolate, so we, seconding your
pious and laudable desire with the favour it deserves, and according to
your request a benignant assent, are pleased and willing that to extend
the bounds of the Church and for preventing the re-growth of vice
(recursu) and for amending morals and sowing the seeds of virtue and
for the advancement of the Christian religion, you shall enter that
island and do therein what tends to the honour of God and the salvation
of the people. And let the people of that land receive you honourably
and respect you as dominies — that is, the rights of the Church remaining
unimpaired and inviolate and saving to blessed Peter and to the Holy
Roman Church from each house one denarius annually as cess. If,
therefore, you shall bring to completion effectively what you have
planned in your mind, strive to discipline that nation in good morals,
and act as well by yourself as by those whom you have ascertained to
be by their faith, their words, and their manner of life, fit for the task,
that the Church may be adorned there, that the religion and faith of
Christ may be planted and grow, and that what appertains to the
honour of God and the salvation of souls may be so ordered by you
that you may merit to obtain from God the abundance of the eternal
resvard and succeed in winning a glorious name on earth and in heaven.
Text from the Book of Leinster.
A "ouine x\a ct^etc "oon cpxiosol 51T) AlAinn.
Aequore cum gelido Zepherus fert. (A Fexennia) ^^ [recte) xennia
kymbis.
[Bulla concessa regi anglorum super collationem Hybernise in qua
nichil derogotur juri Hybernicorum sicut in serie verborum patet,]
Adrianus episcopus servus servorum Dei carissirao in Chriyto filio,
illustri regi Anglorum Henrico salutem et apostolicam benedictionem.
Laudabiliter et satis fructuose de glorioso nomine propagando in terris
et seternse felicitatis prgemio cumulando in cjelis tua magnificentia
cogitat, dum ad dilatandos ecclesiie terminos et ad declarandam indoctis
et rudibus populis Christianas fidei veritatem et vitiorum plantaria de
«
'* Tho conclusion should be, we think : — " That you may merit to obtain an
abundance of the eternal reward in heaven, and succeed ia winning a glorious
name on earth." The words have been transposed.
'^ "A Fexennia "should, we suggest, be '" Xeiniia." The proper word is
"Xeuia," but the writer doubles the " d " to get his dautyl iu tho 6tb ylace.
B94i EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
agro Dominico exstirpanda, sicut Catholicus princepts, intendLs, et ad
id conuenientius exsequendum consilium apostolicum exigis et favorera.
In quo facto quanto altiori consilio et majori discretions procedis tanto
in eo feliciorem progressum te, prsestante Domino, confidimus (habi-
turum) eo quod ad bonum exitum et finem soleant pertingere quae de
ardore fidei et religionis amore principium acceperunt. Sane Hiberniam
et omnes insulas quibus sol justitise Christus illuxit quae documenta fidei
perceperunt ad jus beati Petri apostoli et sacrosanctse Romanae ecclesise,
quod tua etiam voluntus recognoscit, non est dubium pertinere. Unde
(tanto) in eis libentius plantationem fidelem et germen gratum Deo
inserimus (quanto) id a nobis interno examine districtius prospiscimus
exigendum. Significasti nobis siquidem, fili in Christo carissime, te
Hibemiae insulam, ad subdendum populum ilium legibus et inde vitiorum
plantaria exstirpanda velle intrare et de singulis domibus annuam
beato Petro unum denarium solvere pensionem, et jura ecclesiae illius
terrae illabata et Integra conservare. Nos itaque pium et laudabile
iesiderium tuum favore congruo proscquentes, et petition! tuse
benigne impendentes assensum, gratum et acceptum habemus ut pro
dilatandis ecclesiae terminis, pro vitiorum restringendo recursu, pro
corrigendis moribus et virtutibus inserendis pro Christianae religionis
augmento, insulam illam ingrediaris et quae ad honorem Dei et salutem
terrae illius spectaverint exequaris, et illius terrae populus houorifice te
recipiat et sicut dominum veneretur, jure nimirum ecclesiarum illibato
et integro permanente, et salva beato Petro apostolo et sacrosanctae
Romanae ecclesiae de singulis domibus unum denarium annua pensione.
Si ergo quod animo concepisti eifectu duxeris persequente coinplendum,
studeas gentem illam bonis moribus informare et agas tam per te quam
per illos quos ad hoc fide verbo et vita idoneos esse perspexeris ut
decoretur ibi ecclesia, plantetur et crescat fidei Christianae religio, et
quae ad honorem Dei et salutem pertinent animarum taliter ordinentur
ut a Deo sempiternae mercedis cumulum consequi merearis, et in terris
gloriosum nomen valeas et in ccelis obtinere. Vale.^^
27 We have italicised the principal variants in this text :—
Henrico is absent in other texts.
Voluntai. — Here and in Matthew Paris, Rolls series, I., p. 304 only. In
Baronius and elsewhere, nobilitas. We make no doubt voluntas is archetypal ; no
scribe would change nobilitas into voluntas. We are unable to say whether the
codex of Matthew Paris in the Vatican, from which Baronius probably got his
version, has voluntas.
Recursu is elsewhere decursu.
In cnelis, elsewhere m saculum, or in scecuUs. Baronius has valeas in STCulis.
In ccelis is, we think, the true text.
The context indicates, we suggest, that the final clause should run : — " Ut a
Deo sempiternae mercedis cumulum consequi merearis in ccelis et gloriosum nomen
valeas in terris obtinere. Vale."
Book of Leinster, Facsimile, p. 342, Giraldus, Piolls series, I„ 65, III. 195,
R,ad. de Diceto, R.S., I. 300. Baronius, vol. 19, p. 128, A.D. 1150., this is the
text of Migne, vol. 183, p. 1441, etc.
[ 395 J
CFIAPTER XXVII.
THE CYMRO-FRANKISH ADVENTURERS.*
BEFORE considering what we shall call for brevity, the
Papal Documents, whether genuine or spurious,
relating to the alleged Donation of Ireland to Henry II, it
is necessary to say a few words about Diarmaid himself.
Diarmaid at the time of his banishment had been forty
years on the throne. The date of his birth is uncertain, our
texts agree that he was the son of Donnchadh Mac Murcadha,
and 20th in descent from Enna Ceinselach who was king of
Leinster in the 4th century. Donncadh was slain in 1115,2 and
was succeeded by Enna who reigned eight years (1117-1125).
Diarmaid who, according to our view, was too young to
reign when his father died, mounted the throne on the death
of Enna in 1126. We would place his birth about the year
1 100.3 Till his flight he had shown himself an active,
ambitious, and withal a politic ruler. Shortly after his
accession when he was firmly seated on the throne of Leinster
he claimed the over-lordship of Leath Mogha, that is, ol
the whole South of Ireland. He invaded Ossory in 1134.
» The followers of William the Conqueror, commonly called Normatis,
called themselves Francii long after their settlement in England, The
adventurers to Ireland were from Wales, i.e., Cymri, or Francii. They
spoke either Cymric or French, or in some cases I<atin. Henry II, though
brought up in Englasd for four years could'nt speak English.
2 F. M. 1115. Donncadh Ua Maelnambo, the father of Diarmaid, and the
great grandson of Maelnambo, was slain in a battle in which Domhnall
O'Brien and the foreigners of Dublin were victorious.
3 O' Donovan gives his genealogy (F. M. 1052 a.d,) and says he was sixty-
two in 1153, which would place his birth at 1090. We find it difficult to
accept this view, as if he was twenty-five at his father's death we should
expect him to have succeeded immediately ; and his vigour and activity up
to his death in 1171 would be very exceptional in a man of eighty. There
is an entry in the Book of Leinster, on the other hand, which states that he
reigned forty-six years and died in the sixty-first (LXI) year of his age.
This we cannot accept, as it would make him out to be only fifteen (61 — 46)
at the time of his accession. The entry should probably be LXXI and not
LXI. Mistakes often occur in the Roman numerals. See F. M, 1052, 1115
and 1153. Todd, War of the Gael xi. and LL p. 39 g.
3^6 EABLY IRISH HISTORY.
and though repulsed at first succeeded afterwards in
defeating the men of Ossory and their allies, the northmen
of Waterford, and laid siege to the latter town. 4 In 1149
he invaded Meath and in alliance with the Northmen of
Dublin plundered Duleek. He next made alliance with
O'Conor, and helped him, as we have seen, to win the battle
of Moin Mor over the men of Munster, and to invade
O'Ruairc's territory.
Afterwards when MacLochlainn became predominant he
attached his fortunes to him and remained true to him till
he fell at Leiter Luin in 11 66.
Diarmaid also took precautions to secure the support of
the Church. He married Mor, the sister of Saint Laurence
O'Toole, and was a munificent benefactor of rehgion.
Saint Laurence, after he became Archbishop of Dublin,
replaced the Secular Canons, at Christ Church by Canons
regular of the Augustinian Order of the reform of Aroasia
in Artois, and joined the Order himself in 11 40. Diarmaid
founded and endowed a Convent for Nuns of the Aroasian Order
at St. Mary de Hogges near the site of St. Andrew's Church in
the city of Dublin, and two dependent cells at Kilcleshin
in Kilkenny near Waterford, and at Aghade in Carlow — in
1 15 1, 5 In the same year he founded the Abbey of Baltin-
glass for Cistercian Monks, and in 1161 an Abbey for Austin
Canons at Ferns. About 1160 he confirmed a donation of
lands, etc., at Duisk in Kilkenny to Felix, Abbot of Ossory,
for the construction of a monastery in honour of St. Benedict.
St. Laurence was one of the witnesses to the charter. 6
Diarmaid also founded a Convent for Canons on the spot
where Trinity College now stands, under the title of the
Church, Priory, and Canons of All-Hallows, and endowed
it with an extensive estate at Baldoyle. The charter of endow-
ment which is still extant is made to his " spiritual father
• F. M. 1132. The Siege of Waterford by Diarmaid Mac Murchadha king
of Leinster and Conchobar O'Brien, king of the Dal-Cais, and the foreigners
of Ath-Cliath and L. Carmen who had 200 ships on the sea.
• O'Curry prepared a pedigree of St. Laurence for O'Hanlon's Life of Ihe
Saint, it will be found at page 12. He states that he compared the books
of Ballymote, Lecan, and Mac Firbis with the Book of Leinster and says :
" Mor the daughter of Muirchertach ua Tuathail (father of St. Laurence) was
the wife of Diarmaid Mac Murchadha, king of Leinster and of the Danes."
St. Laurence's nephew was at this time (1167) Abbot of the powerful
Abbey of Glendalough.
• See facsimile MS. Gilbert LXII., where a copy of this charter is givea.
THE CYMRO-FRANKIRH ADVENTURERS. ^97
and Confessor, Eden, Bishop of Louth,"? as a trustee, and
St. Laurence is one of the witnesses.
Against these sohd facts we find a considerable quantity
of adverse and most frequently rhetorical criticism dating
from Giraldus onward. Giraldus' description of Diarmaid
is worth quoting textually : " In stature Diarmaid was tall
and his frame was very large. Among his own people he
was bold and combative. His voice was hoarse from the
frequent and prolonged battle-shouts. He had rather be
feared than loved by all. He pulled down the mighty and
lifted up the weak. Odious to his own he was hated by the
stranger. Every man's hand was against him and his hand
against every man. In his youth at the beginning of his reign he
was an oppressor of the nobility, and raged against the magnates
of his own country with a great and intolerable tyranny." 8
There are, we think, only two acts answering this descrip-
tion recorded of Diarmaid in our annals. One is the blinding
of Niall ua Mordha of Leix, whom Diarmaid released from
fetters after depriving him of his sight. This abominable
practice of blinding had come west from the east, and was
common in England from the time of the Conquest, as well
as in Ireland.
A second entry in our annals states that Diarmaid ** acted
treacherously towards the chieftains of Leinster, viz.,
Domhnall Lord of Ui Faelain, and ua Tuathail, both of whom
he killed, and towards the Lord of Feara Cualann who was
blinded by him. This deed caused great weakness in Leinster,
for seventeen of the nobility of Leinster and many others
with them were killed." 9
Diarmaid is further charged with having been accessory
to the abduction of an Abbess, lo a charge which is probably
' The charter is given in the Registrum Priorat. Omn. SS. Ed. R. Butler p. 50
* " Dermod Mac Murchad expelled by Roderick O'Conor for enormous
crimes of a public and private nature." — O'Conor of Belnagare Dissertations
262, " A beastly prince" Lanigan IV., 184-191. " His whole life was a
record of violence and villainy, he was cruel, tyrannical and treacherous,
and was hated in his own day as much as his memory has been hated ever
since." — Joyce, Short History, p. 245.
' The Entry F. M. 1141 a.d. appears to point to a revolt of some sort which
Diarmaid put down with probably undue severity. The rebels were not his
tribesmen.
10 1135. The Abbess of Kildare was forced and taken out of her cloister
by Diarmaid Mac Murchadha king of Leinster, and compelled to marry one
of the said Diarmaid's people, at whose taking he killed 107 of the townsmeu,
— Murphy, Ann, Clon., p. 193.
308 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
as ill-founded as that of his elopement with Dearbforgaill,
with which we have already dealt. It is not mentioned by
the Four Masters.
These are the only acts of cruelty recorded against
Diarmaid during a reign of 40 years. His record wiU, we think,
bear favourable comparison with those of contemporary
monarchs at home and abroad.
Assuming the tale told in the Metalogtcus to be true, and
that the facts stated were known to some of the ecclesiastics
or monks in touch with Diarmaid, the course he took after
his flight was such as might have been reasonably expected.
When an under-lord or chieftain was unjustly attacked he
appealed for succour or protection in the last resort to the
High King or over-lord. But if the true over-lord of all
was the Pope, and Henry was his vice-gerent (and there can
be no doubt that this was the orthodox teaching, at the time,
of the regular, if not of the secular, clergy in the South of
Ireland), if unable to stand alone against O'Conor and his
allies, and if the Northern Ui Neill were not in a position to
help him, to whom could Diarmaid appeal for succour and
redress but to Henry, after his expulsion and flight ?
Diarmaid, therefore, determined to turn for help to Henry
Plantagenet. He went first to Bristol, where he found shelter
for a time in the Priory of St. Augustin. Thence he proceeded
to Normandy, and finally to Acquitaine, where he found
Henry. He was cordially received, but Henry was not then
in a position to restore him to his kingdom by force of arms.
After receiving his bond of allegiance and oath of fealty the
king gave him an open letter directed to all his subjects in
every part of his dominions stating : " If anyone is willing
to aid in restoring Diarmaid our liegeman, be it known to him
that he will have our licence and our favour." Assuming again
that the story in the Metalogicus is true, and that Henry was
aware that the Pope claimed the over-lordship of Ireland, we
think it unlikely that he would have given this licence without the
authority of the reigning Pope, Alexander III. Accepting
the homage of one of the Pope's under-lords and
authorising his own subjects to go in arms to help him with-
11 Unde et quisquia ei (i.e., Dermetio) de amplitudinis nostr«e finibus
tanquam homini et fiddli nostro restitutionis auxilium impendere voluerit so
nostram ad hoc tam gratiam noverit quam licentiam obtinere. — Expug.
Hib. II.
THE CYMRO-FRANKTSH ADVEXTURERS. 399
out the Pope's kcence would be a clear invasion of Papal
rights. We are, therefore, prepared to find it stated that
Alexander did confirm Pope Adrian's donation. The
authenticity of the Bull is, of course, questioned, but we
think that the probabilites are strongly in favour of its
being genuine. Henry would never have led an army into
Ireland without a confirmation of Adrian's Donation,
assuming it to be genuine.
The dates at this point cannot be exactly fixed. The
negotiations which probably included a reference to Rome,
as we have suggested, must have occupied a considerable
time, Diarmaid was banished in 1166, he did not return to
Bristol until 1168. The Pope's open letter of confirmation ran
thus : —
In as much as the -privilegia which have been on reasonable
grounds granted by our predecessors deserve to be confirmed and
permanently sanctioned. We treading in the foot-steps of the
venerable Pope Adrian, and hoping for the fruit of what you
desire, (hereby) ratify and confirm his grant made to yoa of the
lordship of the Kingdom of Ireland, saving to the Blessed Peter
and the Holy Roman Church, as in England so in Ireland, an
annual cess of one denarius from each house, to the end that the
barbarous nation which is qualified with the christian name, by
your diligence may be clothed with loveliness of manners ; and the
Church of this land, hitherto in disorder, be reduced to order, and
that people may, in future, not only be called, but live like, pro-
fessing Christians. "
The coming of Henry may be properly said to have begun
at this point. The proceedings of the adventurers who
availed themselves of his licence, and were his precursors,
will be best understood when read in connection with subsequent
events. We shall, therefore, reserve details on this head
for the second volume of this history, and confine ourselves
here to stating briefly the events that occurred up to the death
of Diarmaid.
On leaving Acquitaine Diarmaid returned to Bristol where
he read the king's letter publicly, and began his quest for
adventurers. After some time, probably in the summer of
1 168, he fell in with a ruined baron whose estate had been
confiscated by Henry — Richard De Clare, Earl of Pembroke
12 In the De Instr Princ. is found what appears to be an interpolation or
subsequent addition by Giraldus himself, stating that some asserted, and
some denied, that this letter was ever obtained. — Giraldus Bolh Strict,
v.. 318.
400 EARLY lEIRH HISTORY.
and Strigul, commonly known as Strongbow. ^3 Diarmaid
came to terms with him, promising him his eldest daughter in
marriage and the succession to his kingdom, and Strongbow, on
his side, promised to come to Diarmaid's aid with a military
force in the following spring. So far as the kingdom was
concerned, Diarmaid's promise was illusory ; the succession to
it was not Diarmaid's to bestow ; he obtained it himself
by election, not by primogeniture, and the clansmen would
surely assert their undoubted rights when the throne became
vacant. Moreover, there were other daughters, and there
was male issue, legitimate and illegitimate. Conor, the
legitimate son, was delivered as a hostage to the king of
Connacht in 1169, and subsequently put to death by him,
and Domhnall Caevanagh, Mac Murchada, an illegitimate son,
is described by the Four Masters as " king of Leinster in
in 1175, when he was treacherously slain." u Nor is it quite
clear that Eva was legitimate. If so her yoimger sister was
married before her to O'Brien, which would be against the
invariable usage of the Gael.
Strongbow, however, was not in any hurry to fulfil his
engagement. Probably he could not induce his friends and re-
tainers to muster courage for the adventure, He also wished
to obtain the special licence of Henry whom he petitioned to
restore to him the lands he had forfeited or to allow him to
seek his fortune in Ireland. Henry gave him the desired per-
mission. Giraldus tells us it was ironical rather than serious. 1 5
Strongbow did not sail from Milford Haven for Waterford
until August 23rd, 1 170. In the meantime Diarmaid had
secured the help of other adventurers. On leaving Bristol,
he journeyed through South Wales on his way to St. David's
whence he intended to sail to Wexford. At this
time Rhys ap Griffith, the son of Griffith ap Rhys, and the
grandson of Rhys ap Tudor, was the prince of a considerable
territory in South Wales under Henry II with whose Justiciary
Richard De Lacy, he had some time before arranged terms
of peace. His aunt Nesta, the daughter of Rhys ap Tudor,
^3 The castle of Strigul was at or near Chep&tow on the Wye. Richard's
father had been created Earl of Pembroke by Stephen in 1138, and his grand-
father, it is said, had received the grant of Cardigan from Henry I., which
means that he had been allowed to sieze it and dispossess Cadogan, the
Cymric chieftain.
" F. M. 1175, and 0' Donovan.
1*" Accepta igitur quasi licentia ironica raagis quam vera Expug. Hib
I., c. 13.
THE CYilRO-FRANKISH ADVENTURERS. 401
had been the mistress of Henry I ; from this connection came
the Fitzhenrys. Afterwards she became the wife of Gerald
of Windsor, Castellan of Pembroke ; from this union came
the Fitzgeralds — three sons and a daughter Angharad, who was
married to William de Barri, father of Giraldus the historian.
David the youngest son was then Bishop of St. David's.
Thirdly Nesta was married to Stephen, Castellan of Abertivy
in Cardigan to whom she bore Robert Fitzstephen.^^
When Diarmaid arrived at St. David's he was treated
with great kindness by the Bishop and by Gryffith ap Rhys.
It so chanced that at this time Robert Fitzstephen who had
been kept in prison for three years by his cousin, Gryffith
ap Rhys, had been released on condition that he would join
Gryffith in taking up arms against Henry H. It was now
arranged through the Bishop of St. David's and Maurice
Fitzgerald, his brother, with the consent of Gryffith, that
Robert Fitzstephen, instead of taking up arms against
Henry H. should join his brother Maurice in fighting to restore
Diarmaid ; that they should cross with their forces in the
ensuing spring and that Diarmaid should grant them the
town of Wexford and two cantreds of land to hold in fee.
The town and land were, we would suggest, then in the pos-
session of the Northmen. Meantime Diarmaid sailed
for home, and entering the monastery at Ferns was hospitably
received by the Austin canons, and spent the winter there
in concealment. When the spring came round Fitzstephen
mustered 30 men-at-arms of his own kindred and retainers,
60 men in armour, and about 300 archers and foot soldiers —
the flower of the youth of Wales. These he embarked in three
ships with which he landed at Bannow in Wexford about the
1st May, 1 169. Hervey de Mountmaurice, an uncle of
Strongbow, joined them as an explorator, to observe and
report to him the state of affairs in Ireland. Maurice de
Prendergast also arrived the following spring from South Wales
with 10 men-at-arms and a body of archers, in two ships.
By this time the whole auxiliary forces would probably have
reached about 600 ; they were joined by Diarmaid with 500
men, and the combined forces attacked Wexford. The first
*^ We abstain from considering here, as unimportant ior our pnrpose,
whether Nesta was married to Fitzstephen, or whether it was befoBe or after
her marriage with Gerald of Windsor she became mistress of Henry II, We
present merely a popular view and have not investigated the matter.
2D
402 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
assault was repulsed, but on the following day two Bishops
who were in the town made peace, and the townsmen
submitted to Diarmaid their rightful sovereign and gave
him hostages for their fealty. Large numbers now joined
him, bringing the united forces up to about 3,000.
These forces then marched into Ossory. Ossory was part of
the territory formerly under Diarmaid's over-lordship, and
Donnchad, the chieftain, had, 11 years before, captured and
blinded his eldest son Enna, Rigdamna of Leinster. The
men of Ossory, Giraldus teUs us, made a stout resistance,
avaihng themselves of the shelter of woods and morasses.
But pursuing the enemy into the open they were charged and
cut to pieces by the cavalry. 200 heads were cut off and laid
at Diarmaid's feet, " among them was the head of one he
mortally hated, and taking it by the ears and hair he tore
the nostrils and lips with his teeth." We mention this absurd
story as it is often quoted by English writers, who forget
that the credulous author of the story " saw with his own
eyes " embryo barnacle geese growing like limpets on the
rocks along the Irish Coast. The story told by Giraldus is not
confirmed by any other author.
The king of Ossory sued for peace and gave hostages to
Diarmaid. When Ruadhri O'Conor was apprised of these
proceedings, he mustered his forces and invaded Leinster.
Fitzstephen and the Leinster men did not venture to meet
him in the open, but retreated to a strong defensible position
near Ferns. Peace was, however, made without fighting,
and on these conditions : Leinster was to be left to Diarmaid •
Ruadhri was to be acknowledged as Ard-righ ; Diarmaid
was to give his son Conor as hostage to Ruadhri, who
promised that should peace be firmly established, he would,
in the course of time, give his daughter in marriage to the
young prince. These conditions were publicly proclaimed
and sworn to. There was also a secret agreement that
Diarmaid should not bring in any more foreigners, and should
send away those he had already called in as soon as he had
reduced Leinster to a state of order. We make no doubt
that Diarmaid honestly intended to carry out these arrange-
ments. It was clearly his interest to do so if he could, as the
life of his son was at stake. But history teaches us, by many
examp>3, that ^llie$ or mercenaries hke those with Diarmaid
THE CYMRO-FRANKISH ADVENTURERS.
403
begin by giving help and advice and end by issuing peremptory
orders. The Cymro-Frankish adventurers had come to stay,
and on the arrival of additional contingents under Maurice
Fitzgerald (lo men-at-arms, 30 mounted archers, 100 bow-
men on foot, in two ships) in 1169, and under Strongbow in
1170,17 Diarmaid became a puppet in their hands, and
they determined to carve out kingdoms for themselves in
the fairest regions of Erin. Giraldus says, that Diarmaid
wrote to Strongbow in a poetical strain urging him to come
quickly. We may be certain that it was not Diarmaid's
letters, if such were ever sent, which we question, but
the reports of Hervey de Mountmaurice and the en-
treaties of the other leaders that influenced his decision. He
landed near Waterford on the 22nd August, 1170. The city
was taken with great slaughter, but the captives were spared
through the intervention of Diarmaid, The marriage of
Strongbow and Eva was then celebrated, according to the
agreement.
Before sailing for Ireland Strongbow had sent forward
Raymond le Gros, son of William Fitzgerald, who was an
elder brother of Maurice Fitzgerald. Raymond le Gros sailed
with 10 men-at-arms and 70 archers, and landed at Dun-
donnell, a rocky promontory about 8 miles from Waterford.
There he threw up a slight fortification made of sods and
the boughs of trees. The citizens, mostly Northmen, promptly
advanced from the city to attack him, but though superior
in numbers they were repulsed with great loss. Seventy
were taken prisoners. " Then the victors abused their
great good fortune by detestable counsels and inhuman
cruelty." This was, Giraldus is careful to mention, at the
instigation of Hervey de Mountmaurice and against the
vehement protest of his cousin Raymond le Gros. " Of two
things," urged Hervey de Mountmaurice, " we must choose
one, we must either resolutely accomplish what we have
undertaken, and stifling all emotions of pity utterly subjugate
17
Robert Fitzstephen
Maurice de Prendergast
Maurice Fitzgerald
Raymond le Groa
Strongbow
3 ships.
390 men.
0
2 ::
?
200 (?) „
140 „
70 „
1,200 „
Total
2,000
404 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
this rebellious nation, by the strong hand, or indulging in
deeds of mercy, as Raymond proposes, sail homeward."
He adds " Hervey's opinion was approved by his comrades
and the wretched captives had their limbs broken and were
cast headlong into the sea." ^^
Strongbow, on leaving Waterford, marched to Dublin.
Hasculf was the king of the Norse there. The Archbishop,
Saint Laurence O'Toole, obtained a truce that terms of peace
might be settled. " Notwithstanding this, Raymond on
one side of the city and Milo de Cogan on the other rushed
to the walls with bands of youths, and making a resolute
assault got possession of the place with great slaughter of the
citizens." Hasculf and the rest escaped to their ships, and
sailed to the northern islands. After spending a few days
in Dublin Strongbow invaded Meath and laid waste the whole
territory with fire and sword. O'Conor then put Diarmaid's
son to death. So far Giraldus. The entry in the Four
Masters runs : —
1170, A.D., an army was laid by Mac Murchadha, with his
men-at-arms (ri-oitieA-oAib) into Meath and Breffni, and they
plundered Clonard, Kells, Tailltin, Dowth, Slane, Dulane, Kilskeery
and Castle Kieran, and they afterwards made a predatory incursion
into Tir Briuin, and carried off many persons and cows to their
camp. The hostages of Diarmaid were put to death by Ruadhri
O'Conor at Athlone, namely Conchobar the son of Diarmaid, the
Rigdamna of Leinster, and his grandson, i.e., the son of Domhnall
Caemhanach, and the son of his foster-brother, i.e., O'Caellaighe.
1171 A.D. Diarmaid Mac Murchadha, king of Leinster, by whom
a trembling sod was made of all Ireland, after bringing over the
Saxons, after having done extensive injury to the Gael, after
plundering and burning many churches as Kells, Clonard, etc.,
died at Ferns before the end of a year, after this plundering, by an
insufferable and unknown disease, through the miracles of God,
Colomba, and Finnan, whose churches he had profaned som®
time before, without will, without Penance, without the Body of
Christ as his evil deeds deserved.
If this be true, Diarmaid was very badly treated by the
Church to which he had been a munificent friend, but it is
not true. The Book of Leinster, which is a better authority,
states that, he died at Ferns " after the victory of Unction
and Penance." This, we have no doubt, is the truth. We do
not present Diarmaid to our readers as a hero ; but historical
18 Expng. Hih. I., C, XIII.
THE CYMRO-FRANKISH ADVENTUREns. 405
justice, weighing the facts dispassionately, demands that
he should not be made a scapegoat. ^9
We must now return to the illaudable Laudahiliter. An
examination of this script reveals at once to the trained
eye the practised hand of one who had completely
mastered the technicalities of the suppressio vcri, and come
perilously near the asscrtio falsi. The object he had in view
was to make it appear to the Irish that there was no derogation
from their rights. This he accomplished by using dominant
words that lend themselves to two interpretations ; the words
jus and Dominus. The statement in the text that all islands
which have received the teachings of the Christian religion
belong to the jus of the Blessed Peter may mean (a) belong
to the jus ecclesiasticum or spirituale, i.e., to the ecclesiastical
or spiritual jurisdiction of the Church of Rome ; or (&) belong
to the jus proprium or temporale, i.e., to the proprietary or
temporal jurisdiction of the Church. We have had the
curiosity to look into some modern translations and we find
that Cardinal Moran amongst others translates the passage
" All the islands which have received the knowledge of the
christian faith are subject to the authority of St. Peter and
of the Most Holy Roman Church " i.e., to the ecclesiastical
jurisdiction. On the other hand, Rev. William Morris and
many others, translate the passage " All islands which have
received the traditions of the Christian church belong to
Saint Peter and the most Holy Roman Church " i.e., the
proprietary jurisdiction. 20 Xhe latter is the sense in
which it has been understood in subsequent official docu-
ments.
The word dominus may mean either {a) title of respect,
or of office like the missi dominici of Charlemagne, or {h) the
feudal owner of the dominium, i.e., the demesne in fee of the
lands. In official documents, v.g., in many letters in Theiner,
England is referred to as the kingdom (regnum), and Hibernia
as the lands (terra) or dominium of the dominus or lord. It was
probably by the same draughtsman that the celebrated letter in
1 157 of Adrian IV. to Frederick Barbarossa and the German
^^ "-Aec 1 peftiA 1<^|1 mbudit) onjcA oeuf AtVijuji." The Book of Leinster is
not mentioned in the List of Books from which the Four Masters composed the
Annals.
=0 7r. Ecd. Rec, 1872, Nov.; Burke, Rev, T,, Lectures, 225; Morris,
B.er. W., Iridund and St. Pat rick, 122.
406 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
Bishops was composed. Frederick held a diet of great magnifi-
cence at Besangon in that year. Hither went Cardinal Roland,
afterwards Alexander III., then Chancellor to Adrian IV.,
with another envoy, to present the letter. They were received
in public audience. Roland read the letter which referred
to the beneficia conferred by the Pope on Frederick who had
been recently crowned ; the word had two meanings (i)
benefits (2) a technical meaning in feudal usage, i.e., fiefs,
The German Magnates understood it in the feudal sense
and when the Cardinal pronounced it they sprang to their
feet and half drew their swords. One of them, Otho, faced
Roland and demanded whether he meant that Frederick held
his empire as a fief of Adrian. Undaunted Roland answered.
" And of whom then does he hold it if not of our Lord
the Pope ? " Otho then drew his sword and was about to
cut him down, when Frederick interposed. The Pope after-
wards explained that beneficimn meant hene factum, a good
deed or benefit, and that it was not used in the feudal sense,
in the letter.21
The three letters of Alexander III in the Liher Scacarii
correspond in substance with the Laudahiliter. They are
addressed to Henry II. the bishops, and the kings and chief-
tains of Ireland respectively, and are dated September 20th,
1 172. The letter addressed to Henry congratulates him on
his success. It contains the notable words " the Church
of Rome has a different /z^i- in the case of islands from what
H has in the case of a continent." 22
Urban II, in 1091 in the grant already referred to,
deduced the right of Constantine to give away islands frora
the strange principle that all islands were legally juri^
puhlici, and, therefore, State domains, "and so when they
receive the Christian faith they would come under both rights "
the jus spirituale and jus proprium. He uses the words,
not in jus, but in jus proprium condonatae. So too.
Innocent III, in 1213 in his letter of acceptance, states that
'1 The words were " si majora beneficia excellentia tua de manu nostra
suscepisset." Adrian's explanation ia " Hoc enini nomen (i.e., beueficium)
ex bono et facto est editum, et dicitur beneficium apud nos, non feudum sed
bonum factum." Migne 188, p. 1526 (1st letter), Migne 188, p. 1555 (2nd
letter).
'* Romana ecclesia aliud jus habet in insula quam in terra magna et
continua." The three letters of Alexander III, are given in Migne 200,
D. 113.
THE CYMRO-FRANKISH ADVENTURERS. 407
John with the consent of the English barons had given over
his realm to the Pope "in jus et proprietatem" — Rymer I.
117.
There is no reference to tlie Donation of Adrian in any
of these letters, nor should we expect to find any if we assume
that Adrian's Donation had been previously confirmed, as
we suggest it had been.
There is also a letter of Adrian IV. written about the
beginning of 1159 to Louis VII, of France, the language of
which corresponds very closely in parts with the Laudahiliter,
and it has been suggested that any draughtsman having that
letter before him might concoct the Laudabilitey. We very
much doubt this, and we think that it is very much more
probable that it was composed by the person who wrote the
letter to Louis VII. and the letters of Alexander III., and
may have been prepared, but not issued, in the lifetime of
Adrian IV. 23
In our judgment there is ample evidence to prove the
Donation of Adrian IV. putting aside altogether the
Laudahiliter, the confirmation of Alexander, and the three
letters in the Liher Scacarii. Bishop Creighton considered
the statement of John of Salisbury alone sufficient and un-
answerable. Henry would never have gone to the expense
of a military expedition to Ireland without a clear hereditary
title from the Pope who claimed to be over-lord of it, and
his title founded on the Donation is referred to in official docu-
ments and otherwise, century after century.
In the chronicle of Robert of Torigny ( + 1 1 84-1 186) we find an
entry that at a council held at Winchester at Michaelmas
1 165, the question of conquering Ireland, and giving it to
Henry's brother, William, was considered " and because it
was not pleasing to the Empress his mother, the expedition
was put off for another time." Could there be any reasonable
doubt that the deliberation was connected with the receipt
of the emerald ring? Henry, who was then only 22, had to
reduce his own kingdom to subjection before thinking of
^' The texts of the letter to Louis VII. and of the Laudahiliter are compared
in parallel columns in the Annalecta Juris Pontificii, 1882. The names of
the numerous writers for and against the genuineness of the Laudahiliter
will be found in Mr. Thatcher's Studies Concerning Adrian /F., Chicago
Decern. Pub., Volume IV., First Series. He follows the valuable
article of Boichorst in Mitheilungen der Instuiut. fur Oesterreich. Oeschiehte,
1893, p. 101. He does not refer to the text in the Book of Leinsier.
408 3EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
foreign conquests, and the excuse was diplomatically correct
and probably true.
In the year 1318 {1317 ?) Donald O'Neil " King of
Ulster and of all Ireland, the rightful heir by hereditary
right, and the kings and magnates and the whole laity "
sent to Pope John XXII, a letter of appeal and protest. 24
It is a very long document, we can only present our readers
extracts condensed from it.
After stating that there were 136 kings before the coming
of St. Patrick and 61 subsequently, who in temporals
acknowledged no superior, all of the same stock, without
any mixture of foreign blood, who richly endowed the church
with landed and other property of great extent and value,
of much of which the Church had been " damnably despoiled "
by the English, it proceeds, —
And after that the kings aforesaid had had for so long a time
by their own efforts energetically defended against the princes
and kings of other countries the inheritance granted them by God,
always preserving inviolate their native liberty, at length your
predecessor, Pope Adrian (an Englishman not so much by origin
as by his state in life and affection) in the year of Our Lord 1170
upon the representations false and full of iniquity of Henry.
King of England (under whom, and perhaps, through whom
St. Thomas of Canterbury in the same year suffered death, as
you know, in defence of Justice and the Church), made over de
facto the lordship of this kingdom of ours in a specific form of words
to the same (king), whom rather for the crime aforesaid he ought
to have deprived of his own kingdom. Our rights de jure were
utterly disregarded ; his leaning to the English — Ah the grief of it —
blinding the vision of the great Pontiff, and thus taking away from
us our royal honour without any culpability on our part, and with-
out any reasonable cause he delivered us over to be lacerated by
teeth more cruel than those of wild beasts, and those of us who
have unhappily escaped half-alive with torn flesh, the teeth of these
crafty foxes and ravening wolves have been forced down into the
abyss of a lamentable servitude. For ever since that time when
the English, on the occasion of the grant aforesaid, and under
an outward appearance of holiness and religion, nefariously entered
the borders of our kingdom they have been striving with all their
might, using all the arts of perfidy to completely exterminate
and tear up from the roots our people ; mendaciously asserting
'* Johannes de Fordun Scotichronicon III., 908 (condensed). A brief notice
of this letter will be found in the Continuator of Baronius sub anno 1.317.
The Scotichronicon was commenced by John of Fordun in the Mearns
and completed to the death cvf David I., 115.3. Before dying he gave his
collected materials to Walter Bower, Abbot of Inch Colum, on a little island
in the Forth, who continued the History to the murder of James I. in 143(5.
The years in the text are probably reckoned from the Incarnation, as m the
^ymals of Ulster.
THE CYMRO-FRANEISH ADVENTURERS. 409
in the depth of their fury that we have no right to any free
dwelUng-place in Ireland, but that the whole country belongs of
right to themselves alone. More than 50,000 have perished in
the wars since the coming of Henry, besides those who
have died from hunger or in dungeons. Now Henry promised,
as is contained in the said Bull, that he would extend the boundaries
of the Church, etc. (here follow the words of the Laiidahiliter).
This promise has been violated in every instance. Some
cathedral churches have been plundered of a moiety and more
of their land ; our bishops are seized and imprisoned, yet though
suffering these outrages, constantly through slavish timidity they
do not bring them before your Holiness. So we shall be silent about
them. Instead of reforming they have corrupted the Irish by
their bad example, and deprived them of their laws (specific
cases are here mentioned). Killing an Irishman is not murder,
and some of their religious assert that it is no more sin to kill an
Irishman than to kill a dog or any other brute animal. And some
of their monks affirm that if it should happen to them to kill an
Irishman they would not for this refrain from the celebration of
Mass for a single day. Accordingly what they preach in words
the monks of the Cistercian Order at Granard, in the diocese of
Armagh, undoubtedly put shamelessly in practice in deed.
And likewise the monks of the same Order at Inch, in the Diocese
of Down. For, appearing publicly in arms they attack and slay
the Irish, and yet celebrate their Masses nothwithstanding.
They {i.e., the Anglo-Normans) affirm that it is lawful for them
to take from us by force of arms our lands and property of every
kind, not considering this anything to trouble their con-
sciences even at the hour of death. It is those people, who by their
crafty, deceitful scheming have alienated us from the kings of
England, hindering us, to the great injury of the king and kingdom,
from holding the lands rightfully ours in capite willingly from
them, and sowing between ourselves and these monarchs undying
discord in their unbridled lust for our territories. The yearly
denarius from each house has not, as everyone knows, been paid.
We sent forward a letter describing these outrages and abomin-
ations aforesaid to the king of England and his Council through
the Bishop of Ely, and made a courteous proposal that we should
hold our lands immediately from the king in capite, according to the
conditions in the Bull of Adrian a full transcript of which we transmit
herewith ; or that he should, with the consent of both parties,
divide our lands according to some reasonable plan between us,
and thus avoid wholesale bloodshed. We have however, received
no answer to this application. Let no man then be surprised if
we are determined to save our lives and defend the privileges of
our independence against these cruel tyrants and usurpers of
our rights. We are ready to prove our statement by the evi-
dence of twelve Bishops and others and have invited Edward
Bruce to our aid and assistance.^S
25 John XXII. was enthroned September 5, 1316. At Avignon on April
1st, 1317, by authority of Letters Patent of Edward II., dated Septeniber 16,
1316, the King's envoys, after st-ating that they had paid the cess of 1,000 marks
410 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
On the 30th May, 13 18 the Pope wrote from Avignon,
a letter of paternal advice to Henry urging him to redress
the grievances complained of, " that so the Irish people
following more wholesome counsels may render you the
obedience due to their dominus, or if, which heaven forbid,
they shall be disposed to persist in their foolish rebellion they
may convert their cause into a matter of open injustice,
while you stand excused before God and man." He enclosed
the letter of king Donald O'Neil, and the copy of " the grant
which Pope Adrian is said to have made to Henry, that he
might be satisfactorily enlightened on the aforesaid
grievances and complaints." 26
By an x\ct of Parliament, in 1467, after reciting
that " as our Holy Father Adrian, Pope of Rome, was
possessed of all the sovereignty of Ireland in his demesne
as of fee, in right of his Church of Rome, and with the intent
that vice should be subdued, had alienated the said land
to the king of England for a certain rent, etc., by which grant
the said subjects of Ireland owe their allegiance to the king
of England as their sovereign lord, as by the said Bull
appears," it was enacted " that all Archbishops and Bishops shall
for that year, acknowledged themselves bound to pay on his behalf twenty-four
years' arrears of said cess (i.e., one-fourth of 27,000 marks) by four instal-
ments.— Theiner, 193. Secreta, torn. 11., fol. 161. In the Holl Series, p. 443,
it is inaccurately stated that the envoys were sent to pray the Pope to forego
the payment of the arrears ; it should be " to excuse the non-payment of
them."
On lOth April I3I7 a mandate waa issued to judges not named to warn
brethren of the Mendicant Orders, Rectors, Vicars, and Chaplains who had
stirred up the Irish people against the king, and unless they ceased to
excommunicate them publicly. — Theiner, 194. Papal Letters, Bolls Series
ri., 435.
2« Joannes Episcopu3 etc, Eduardo Regi Anglise illustri Ecce fili, quasdam
recepimus letteras. . . in quorum serie vidimus inter cetera contineri
quod cum felicis recordationis Adrianus Papa, predecessor noster sub certis
modo et forma distinctis, apertius in apostolicis litteris inde factis clare
memorie Henrico regi Anglise progenitori tuo dominium Yberniae concessit,
ipse rex et successores ipsius regis Angliae usque ad haeo tempora modum et
formam hujusmodi non servantes, quin immo eos transgredientes, indebite
diris affliotionibus et gravaminibus inauditis importabilium servitutura
oneribus et tyrannidibus inhumania ipsos eo miserabilius et irrtolerabiliua
quo diutius oppresserunt.
Prescriptas litteras missas Cardinalibus antedictis cum anima (sic) formam
litterarum quae praedictus Adrianus predecessor noster eidem Henrico regi
AnglisB de terra Yberniae concessisse dicitur continente tuae magnitudini
mittimus presentibus interclusas. Datum Avinione III., Kal. Junii, Ponti-
ficatua nostri anno secundo.
Cum anima should, we suggest, read cum agnina (pelle) " with a fina
(lambskin) parchment." The editor of the Rolls Series (Ed. II., a.d. 318)
translates, " in a case."
See Theiner Mon. Hib., p. 201. Rolls Series. Papal Letters II., 440.
THE CYMRO-FRANKISH ADVENTURERS. 411
excommunicate all disobedient Irish subjects, and, if they
neglect to do so, they shall forfeit £ioo." 27
In 1555, by a consistorial decree followed by a Bull,
Paul IV. on the humble supplication of Philip and Mary
" erected into a kingdom the island Hibernia, of which
from the time that the kings of England obtained the
dominium of it through the Apostolic See they had merely
called themselves lords (domini), without prejudice to the
rights of the Holy Roman Church or any other person claiming
to have right in it or to it." ^8
The Bull then confers the Royal title and attributes.
This did not displace the over-lordship of Rome, if it existed.
The Bull was delivered by the English Council to Dr. Carey ;
and copies of it were circulated through Ireland, as the Irish
asserted that the Donation from Adrian was forfeited
by Henry VIII. and his son Edward VI., when they renounced
the Pope's spiritual and temporal authority. The Donation,
it forfeited, was in this way restored to its pristine efficacy.
In 1570 the Irish, through the Archbishop of Cashel, had
offered or were about to offer the kingship to Philip of
Spain. This project was communicated to the Pope by
Cardinal Alciato, who wrote to the Archbishop of Cashel,
on July 22nd, 1570 : " His Holiness was astonished that
anything of this kind should be attempted without his
authority, since it was easy to remember that the kingdom
of Ireland belonged to the dominion of the Church, was held
as a fief under it (ad eclesiae ditionem feudi nomine pertinere),
and could not, therefore, unless by the Pope, be subjected
to any new ruler. And the Pope, that the right of the Church
may be preserved as it should be, says, he will not give the letters
you ask for the king of Spain (Philip). But if the king were
himself to ask for the fief of that kingdom, in my opinion the
Pope would not refuse." 29
The instructions to Rinnuccini, mentioned that Ireland
was an ancient possession of the Holy See, and that Henry II.
obtained from Adrian IV., himself an Englishman, with a
«T Parliament Roll 7th E. IV. (1467). The oldest Roll now in existence is
one of the 5th H. VI. (U26). Hardiman Stat, of Kilkenni/, p. 3, -punts the
text of this statute.
28 Btdlarium I., Part V., p. 315 ; Baronius (Continuaior), Vol. 20, p. 301 ;
Lingard, Vol. V., 461.
" Specil. Ossor., I., 69. Ed. Moran P. (Cardinal).
412 EARLY IRISH HISTORY.
liberal hand all that he coveted. 3o We forbear reference
to documents of minor importance.
" What is extraordinary," says Edmund Burke, " is that
for a very long time, even quite down to the Reformation,
and in the most solemn acts, the people of England founded
their title wholly on this grant (from Adrian). They called
for obedience from the people of Ireland not on principles of
subjection, but as mesne lords between them and the
Pope. " 31
In conclusion there is, in our judgment, no controverted
matter in history on which the weight of evidence inclines more
decisively to one side than on this of Adrian's Donation. We
have assigned the Weltpolitik of Rome as the main motive
for this grant. We must not, however, be understood to
exclude motives of a spiritual order. Eugenius III., Adrian
IV., Alexander III., and St. Bernard were, beyond all doubt,
influenced by considerations of the latter kind. The three
letters of Alexander in the Liher Scacarii, the authenticity
of which is not questioned, as well as the Laudahiliter, which
is written in the same spirit, prove this conclusively. But
when the implications contained in these scripts are unfolded,
and the statements evolved confronted with the actual facts,
it would be wholly inadequate to describe them as merely
gross exaggerations.
Rome distracted with internal troubles was misinformed
and ill-advised, and the Gael, \yho deserved a better fate,
were delivered into the hands of ruthless and rapacious
adventurers.
^Embassy in Ireland. Annio Hutton (IS73), p. xxviiij
3* Tracts on the Popery Laws.
[ 413 ]
APPENDIX.
LIST OF THE HIGH KINGS OF ERIN. D^te of
Accession.
B.C.
1. Eremon AND Ebeb ... ... ... ... 1700
2. Er. MUIGHNE, LUIGIINE AND LaIGIINE ... ... 1683
3. Eb. NuadhatNeacht ... ... ... ... 1681
4. Er. Irial Faidh ... ... ... ... 1680
5. Er. Ethreal ... ... ... ... ... 1670
6. Eb. Conmael ... ... ... ... ... 1650
7. Eb. Tighernmas reigned 77 years. Interregnum of 7
years ... ... ... ... ... 1620
8. Itii. Eocaidh Eadghadiiach ... ... ... l.f)36
9; Ir. Sobhaerce and Cearmna Finn ... ... 1532
10. Eb. EocaiduFaebharghlas ... ... ... 1492
11. Er. Fiacha Labhrainne ... ... ... 1472
12. Eb. Eocaidh Mumhno ... ... ... ... 1448
13. Er. Aengus Olmucadha ... ... ... 1427
14. Eb. EnnA AlRGTHEACH ... ... ... ... 1409
15. Er. Roitheachtaigh ... ... ... ... 1382
16. Ir. Sedna ... ... ... ... ... 1357
17. Ir. Fiacha Finscothacu ... ... ... 1352
18. Eb. MuiNEMHON ... ... ... ... 1332
19. Eb. Faeldeargdoid ... ... ... ... 1327
20. Ir. Ollamh Fodula ... ... ... ... 1317
21. Ir. Finnachta ... ... ... .., 1277
22. Ir. Slanoll ... ... ... ... ... 1257
23. Ir. Gedhe Ollghothach ... ... ... 1240
24. Ir. Fiacha Finnailches ... ... ... 1230
25. Ir. Bearnghal ... ... ... ... 1208
26. Ir. Oilioll ... ... ... ... ... 1196
27. Er.Sirna Saeglach reigned 150 3-ears! ... ... nSO
28. Eb. Roitheachtaigh ... ... ... ... 1030
29. Eb. Elim Oilfinshneachta ... ... ... 1023
Note — Er. = Eremonian, Eb. = Eberean. Ir. = Irian, Ith., Ithian. Joint
reigns are reckoned as one. A.M. 3r<00 is deemed — 1.700 b.c.
414
APPENDIX.
30. Er. Giallchaddh
31. Eb. Art Imleach
32. Er. NUADHAT FiNNFAIL ...
33. Eb. Breas
34. Ith. EoCAEDH Apthach ...
OOt AR. X INN ..• ... ■•* ...
36. Eb. Sedna Innarradgh ...
37. Er. Simon Breac
38. Eb. DuACH Finn
39. Er. MUIREDBACH BOLGRACII
40. Eb. Enda Dearg
41. Eb. Luqhaidh Iardonn
42. Ir. Sirlamh ...
43. Eb. EochaidhUaircheas
44. Er. Eocaidh Feadhmuine and Conainq
45. Eb. LuGHAiDH Laimhdhearq
46. Er. CoNAiNG ...
47. Eb. Art
48. Er. FlACHA TOLQRACH ...
49. Eb. OiLioLL Finn ... ... ...
50. Eb. EocHAiDH ...
51. Ir. Airgeatmhab
52. Er. DuACH Ladhgrach ...
53. Eb. LuGHAiDH Laighdhe
54. Ir. Aedh Ruadh, Dithorba, and Cinnbaeth
nately 70 years ...
55. Ir. Queen Macha Mongruadh ...
56. Eb. PwEachtaidh Righdhearq
57. Er. Ugaine MoR
58. Er. Laeghaire LoRc ... ...
59. Er. CoBHTHACH Gael BuEAGH
60. Er. Labhraidh LoiNGSEACH
61. Ek. Melghb Molbhthach
62. Eb. MoDHCORB
63. Er. Aenghus Ollamh ...
64. Er. Irereo
65. Eb. Fearcorb ..
66. Er. CoiNLA Gaemh
67. Er. OiLioLL Gaisfhiaclajh
68. Eb. Adamaib ...
alter-
Dat© of
Accession.
B.C.
1022
1013
1001
951
952
951
929
909
903
893
892
880
871
855
843
838
831
811
805
795
784
777
747
737
730
660
653
633
593
591
541
522
505
498
480
473
462
442
417
LIST OF THE HIGH KINGS OF ERIN 415
Date of
Accession.
B.C.
69. Er. EOCHAIDH AlLTLEATHAN ... ... ... 413
70. Er. Fearghus FoRTAMHAiL ... ... ... 395
71. Er. Aekqhus TuiRMHEAcn ... ... ... 384
72. Er. ConallCollambuach ... ... ... 325
73. Eb. Nia Sedhamain ... ... ... ... 319
74. Er. Enna AiGiiNEAcn ... ... ... .. 312
75. Er. Crimhthann CosGRACH ... ... ... 292
76. Ir. Rudhraighe... ... ... ... ... 288
77. Eb. Innatmar ... ... ... ... ... 318
78. Ir. Breasal Boidhiobhadh ... ... ... 209
79. Eb. LuGHAiDH Luaighne ... ... ... 198
80. Ir. Congal Claroineach ... ... ... 183
81. Eb. Duach Dalta Deadhadh ... ... ... 168
82. Ir. Fachtna Fathach ... ... ... ... 158
83. Er. Eochaidh Fbidhleach ... ... ... 142
84. Er. Eochaidh AiREAMH ... ... ... 130
85. Er. Ederscel ... ... ... ... 115
86. Er. NuADHA Neacht ... ... ... ... no
87. Er. Conaire Mor ... ... ... ... 109
88. Er. LuGHiEDH Sriabh-ndearg ... ... ... 34
89. Er. CoNCHOBHAB Abhradhruadu... ... ... 8
90. Er. Crimhthann Niadhnaer. Birth of Christ in the
eighth year of his reign ... ... ... 7
A.D.
91. Cairbre Cinncbat ... ... ... ... 10
92. Er. FeARADHACH FlNNFEACHTNACH ... ... 15
93. Er. Fiatach Finn ... ... ... ... 37
94. Er. FiACHA FiNNFOLAIDH ... ... ... 40
•70. i R. xLLIM ••• ••• ••• *•• ••• 0(
96. Er. Tuathal Teachtmhar ... ... ... 76
97. Ir. Mal ... ... ... ... ... 107
98. Er. Feidhlimedh Rechtmhar ... ... ... Ill
99. Er. Cathaeir MoR ... ... ... ... 120
100. Er. Conn OP the Hundred Battles ... ... 123
101. Er. Conaire, son of Mogh-Lamha ... ... ... 158
102. Er. Art Aenfir ... ... ... ... 166
103. Ith. Lughaidh, i.e., MacCon ... ... ... 196
104. Er. Fearghus Daibhdeadach ... ... ... 226
105. Er. CoRMAC MacArt ... ... ... ... 227
106. Er. Eochaidh Gonnat ... ... .-- ... 267
416 APPENDIX.
Date of
Accession.
A.D,
107. Er. CaIRBRE LiPPEACHAIR ... ... ... 268
108. Ith. FoTHAD ... ... ... .. ... 285
109. Er. FiACHA Sraibhtixe ... .,. ... ... 286
110. Er. CollaUais ... .., ... ... 323
111. Er. MUIREADHACH TiREACH ,.^ . ... ... 327
112. Ir. Caelbhadii ... ... ... ,.. 357
113. Er. EoCHAIDII MUIGHMHEADHOIX .. ... ... 358
114. Eb. Crimthann ... .», ... ... 366
115. Er. Niall op the Nine Hostages ... ... 379
116. Er. Dathi ... ... ... ... ... 405
117. Er. Laeghairb ... ... ... ... 429
118. Er. Olioll Molt ... ... .., ... 459
119. LuGfiAiDU M.'^cLaeghaire ..., ... ... 479
THE UI NEILL (Eremonian).
120. MUIRCHEARTACH (EoGAn) ... ... ... 504
121. TuATHAL Maelgarbh (Cairbre) ... ... ... 528
122. DiARMAiD (Crimthann) ... ... ... ... 539
123. DoMHNALL AND Fearghus (Eogan) ... ... 569
124. Eochaidh (Eogan) and Baedoix ... ... ... 562
125. AiNMiRE (Conall) ... ... ... ... 564
126. Baedon (Conall) ..» ... ... ... 567
127. Aedh (Conall) ... ... ... ... 568
128. Aedh Slaine (Crimthann) and Colajan Uimidh
(Eogan) ... ... ... ... ... 595
129. Aedh Uairidhnach (Eogan) ... ... ... 601
130. Maelcobha (Conall) ... ... ... ... 608
131. Suibhne Meann (Eogan) ... ... ... 611
132. Domhnall (Conall) ... ... ... ••• 624
133. Conall Gael and Ceallach (Conall) ... ••• . ^40
134. Diarmaid AND Blathmao (Crimthann) ... ... 657
135. Seachnasach (Crimthann) ... ... ... 665
136. Ceannfaeladh (Crimthann) ... ... ... 670
137. Finnachta Fleadach (Crimthann) ... ... 674
138. LoiNGSEACH (Crimthann) ... .. ... 694
139. CoNGAL (Conall) ... ••- ••• •• , 702
140. Feargiial (Eogan) .. ..• ••• ••- 709
141. Fogartach (Crimthann) ... -• ••• 719
142. CiNAETH (Crimthann) ... ... ... ••. 720
Note.— Crimthann and Cairbre represent the Southern Ui Neill Eogan,
and Coaall the Northern Ui Neill.
LIST OF THE HIGH KINGS OF ERIN. 417
Date or
Accession.
AD.
143. Flaithbhrartach (Conall) .., ... ... 723
144. Aedh Allan (Eogan) ... ..^ ... ... 730
145. Do-MHNALL (1st OF Clan Colkman) (Crimthann) ... 739
146. NiALL Frosach (Eogaik) ... ... ... 759
147. Donnchadh (Crimthann) .. ... ... 766
148. Aedh OiRDNiDHE (Eogan) ... ... ... 793
149. CoNCHOBAK (Crimthann) .., .». ... 798
150. NiALL Caille (Eogan) .. ... .» ... 818
151. Maelseachlainn I. Crimthann) ... ... .*. 845
152. Aedh Finnliath (Eogan) ... ... .^ 861
153. Flann Sinna (Crimthann) ... ..> ,» 877
154. NiALL Glundubh (Eogan) ... ... ^. 916
155. Donnchadh (Crimthann) ... ... ... 918
156. Conghalach (Crimthann) ... ... ... 943
157. Domhnall (Eog-»n) ... ... ... ... 955
158. Maelseachlainn II. (Crimthann) ... ... 979
159. Brian Boru (Eber) 'i ■ . ... -.. .. 1002
ADDENDA.
Thisrouannb. — There was a very old inscription, m the
Cathedral of Durham. It ran as follows : — " Sanctus Andomaru*
monachus episcopus." Tavernenses. — St. Omer, Monk Bishop
of Tavema, i.e., Therouanne. St. Omer was a monk from
Liixeuil, and Bishop of Therouanne, about A.D. 637. See Rites
of Durham, Ed. Canon Forster, 1903, p. 130, and supra p. 150.
Round Towers. — Gregorovius writes in his Tagebiicher [Eng.
trans. 1907, p. 140], from Genazzano (13 M. S. E. Tivoli), August
13th, 1861: — "Explored the mountains as far as Mentorella.
The little rock crests of Rocca di Cova and Capronica are verj
striking. Each has a ruined fortress, a solitary round tower
surrounded by a wall. When its defenders could hold out no
longer, they retired into the tower, which has no doors. Tha
priucdpal window was entered by means of a ladder."
INDEX
Adamnan
account of tlie exculpation of Uolumba at the Synod of Tailtiu. 200.
Failbiie tells hiui he was present when Oswald related how Coluuiba
appeared to him before the battle of Heaveniield, 355,
Adrian IV.
grants Ireland to Henry II. at the solicitation o£ John of
Salisbury, 385.
grant not Laudabiliter ; form of suggested, 385
motive of grant to be sought in the Weltpolitik of the Roman
Curia, 386
text of Laudabiliter from the " Book of Leinster," and a translation
of it, 393
an examination and criticism of the text, 405
subsequent facts referring to, and confirmatory of, the donation,
408
AITHEACH TUATHA
not the Attacotti, 96
AGRICOLA
description of Erin of the Gael in, 37
AID AN
his mission and preaching, 356
" his course of life difFei'ent from the slothfulness of our time.''
ALEXANDER III.
his letter confirmatory, and three letters in the Liber Scacarii,
399, 406
AMBER
found in the North Sea, 32
AMMIANUS MARCELLINU3
describes the invasion of Britain by the Picts, Attacotti; and the
Scots, 117
quoted, 111, 113, 131, 139
Angueli Liber
defines the boundaries of the See of Armagh Entrj' as to Brian
Boru refers to, 176
ARBOIS DE JUBAINVILLE
on the " Nasad " of Lug at Lyons, 5
View as to the Battle of Moytura, 26
visits and describesEmmania, 58
420 INDEX.
ARLETTA
mother of William the Conqueror, probably an Ethnic Celt ,113
ARDRIGH
liist of Higli Kings, 413
how chosen and mode of election, 224
Table showing they were selected by the tribe within the royal
stock, 245.
Go Freshahhraidh (with gainsaj-ing), 246
history of, after the death of Maelseachlainn II. (1022) 388
Armagh, Book of
description of, 170
ARCHICLOCOS, Bury's view not accepted, 176
ARTHUR, the name Gaelic, 16
buried at Glastonbury, the finding of his remains, the enormous
size of his bones, 129
ATTACOTTI
the " Tuatha Cat " of Scotland, referred to by St Jerome in a
famous passage, 6
AUSONIUS
describes his villula, 135
Avienus
account of Hamilco's expedition, 35
Augustine, St.
Missionary labours in England, 353
estimate of Pelagius, 154
Bards (see Druids,) 205
their "pot of covetousness." Found an advocate in Columba at
Drumceat, 262
Bede
description of Erin, 1
describes how the Columban monks kept Easter, 357
how they were expelled from Ripon and the place given to
Wilfrid, 370
his letter (724) to Egbert, Archbishop of York — a dark picture of
spiritual decadence.
Bernard, St.
writes to Archbishop Theobald, formerly Abbot of Bee,
recommending John of Salisbury for immmediate promotion, 282
BORLASE
Dolmens, description of, 9
views as to Battle of Moytura, 24
BORUMA
Legend of the imposition of, 9 1
on Alba, rejected at Drvimceat, 263
INDEX. 421
BREHON LAW
Not written but transmitted orally, 212
The contents of the Brehon Law Tracts, 213
Provisions regarding education, 215
Judgment as to eric in the case of St. Patrick's charioteer, 217
The contents of the Senchus Mor as to tithes, etc., 219
BRIAN BORU
Brian and his brother Mahon retire before the Norsemen into the
fastnesses of North Clare and South Gal way, 293
The battle of Sulchoit (908) in which the Norsemen were
routed, 294
King of Munster on the death of Mahon, (976), 298
Peace of Pulloige, (999) between him and Maelseachlainn, and
battle of Glenmama near Dunlavin, 298
Brian marries, first, the granddaughter of Clereach ex quo the
the Ui Clerigh ; second Dubhcobhtaigh, daughter of Cathal
O'Conor, King of Connact ; the story of his marriage, thirdly,
with Gormlaith, I'ojected, 299
his struggle to subdue the North, and circuit through it, 303
his title to be Ard Righ not admitted by the North. They did not
obey his summons to Clontarf, 304
The Battle of Clontarf in which Brian fell in " the counterblow "
of the figlit, 305, 306, 307
his burial at Armagh, and an estimate of his character, 308
Brian
the eldest son of Eocaidh Muigmeadhon, ancestor of the Ui
Briain of Connact, 109
BOADICCEA OR BOUDICCA
Semble, the same as the gaelic boadach or huadach, victorious, des-
cribed and compared with Meve, 43
Bridget, St.
Fire of at Ealdare — described by Giraldus, 195, 197
BRIGANTES
between the Humber and^ the Clyde and in the South East of
Erin, 43
should probably be substituted for Gigantes, 137
BURGUNDY
geography of, complex, 148
CAMDEN
Displacement of the Gaelic Monks from Glastonburv by Dunstan,
126
Cairbre Cinnceat
rising of the Fir-Voice, 91
CARINNA
mother of Niall of the Nine Hostages, a Saxon, 110
422 INDEX.
CASSIAN
his life and labours, 145
builds the monastery of St. Victor at Marseilles, 410 (c)
Bull of Benedict IX. on its re-dedication, 145
Monastic system described by Ruffi, 146
CATHRAIGE
the Tuatha Cat found from Caithness to Inis Cathraige, now
Scattery Island, 4, 5
CEARBHALL
of Ossory, probably King of the Norsemen of Dublin from 872 to
888, 277
referred to in the Land-nama-hoc, 278
CELTS
an intrusive wedge in the centre of France — language of, Semble,
spread to tribes north and south of them, 4
supposed to have brought the custom of incineration from the
East, 8
in forefront of civilization during the Hallstadt period, 50
took possession of the valleys of the Po, the Danube, the Loire,
the Marne, and the Seine ; never came to Erin, 51
characteristics of the Celtic or Alpine stock, 421
CHURCH, EARLY
organisation of, 314
The congahala (habitations) consisted of (1) a church, teach mor,
(2) cuile, room and kitchen in one, and (3) an aregal or embyro
round tower, or " fire-house," 315
the teach na teinidh in Inrdsmurray, 315
the round towers, 316, 417
the pastoral work of the Congahala not done from the monastic
centres, 316
the dioceses, territorial not tribal, 317
amounted to about 50, and were reduced to 26 at the Synod
of Rathbrasail. The catalogue of the Saints, text and trans-
lation, 320, 322.
some observations on the catalogue, 324
the question of the non-canonization of the Irish Saints considered,
325
the Bollandist view as to " canonizing in groups " should be re-
consid'^red, 314
the Irish always added, "whose names were written in Heaven," 325
the Rev. T. Olden's view as to the Consortia Mulierum, 328 ; the
Church obedient to Rome not only in docti-ine but in discipline,
363
CHRISTIANITY
in Erin, before St. Patrick, 207
CEVIBAETH, AEDH RUADH, AND DITHORBA
reigns of, 61
INDEX. 423
COLEMAN, BISHOP
collects his treasures, i.e., the bones of Aidan, and tramps to lona, 279
COLLAS, THE THREE
invade Ulster, burn Emmania, and drive the Clanna Rury into
Ulidia, and make the " Danes Cast."
COLUMBA, ST.
not the cause of the battle of Cuildreimhne and two other battles 258,
the correct translation of ro la ind eirhe n druadh dara cend (note), 259
exculpated at the Synod of Tailten, as stated by Adamnan, 263
acts as a peacemaker at the convention of Drumceat, 575, 262
the story of his copying of the Psalter of St. Finnen furtively, and
the award of Diarmaid, 264
he sails to Alba and takes possession of lona, some details, 349
founds twenty-one " houses " among the Picts and thirty-two among
the Scots of Alba, 350
he appears to Oswald before the battle of Heavenfield and bids
him, "Be of good cheer and play the man, you shall return
victorious," 355
COLUMBANUS + 615
Letters to Gregory and Boniface ; seeks guidance from the Pope ( 1 )
on the Paschal question ; (2) on holding communion with
(a) Simoniacal bishops ; (6) those who had been promoted to
' be bishops after violating the rule as to celibacy whilst deacons,
364
the bishops intercept his letters, and accuse him of keeping Easter
with the Jews, 365
enumeration of Columban foundations from Luxeuil, 365
" Columbanus sowed ; Benedict reaped," 366
The Cofidoviinium established in Columban houses, 366
COLUMBAN MONKS
the teaching of the nations by, 345
what Columba and his disciples at lona were like, their founda-
tions in Scotland, 349
their labours in Germany, summarised by a German priest, 350
the evangelization of England mainly due to them, 353
CONN OF THE HUNDRED BATTLES
defeats Cathaoir Mor, 123, A.D., 93
table of his descendants, 95
OONSTANTINE
Donation of a forgery, 380
the famoxxs " island clause " textually, 381
CORMAC MAC ART
his " teaching of a king," 98
CORMAC MAC CUILLENAIN
bishop of Cashel and king of Munster, killed at the battle of Belack
Mughna, near Carlow (908), 282
424 INDEX.
COROTICUS
epistle to, not genuine, excluded by the Early Church, 166, 170
CRIMTHANN
statement that he was poisoned by his sister, Mong Finn, dis-
cussed, 114
foreign conquests of, 119
CRIMTHANN NIA NAIR
his poem, 98
CROM CRUAICH or CROM DUBH
idol of at Magh Slecht, 29
like the idol of Moloch at Carthage, 31
CUCHULAINN
derivation of name (note), 73
CUELLAR
extract from letter to Philip II. of Spain (Ocfc., 4, 1589) describing
habits and mode of life of the Irish, 344
DA DERGA
hostel of, and the tog ail or destruction of, the subject of a spirited
poem, " Conary," by Ferguson, 87
DATHI
succeeds Niall, and marches to the Alps (Cevennes) to avenge his
death, 117
DAVIS, SIR J. .
disposed at first to make freeholders, 230
letter to Salisbury, describing the state of Fermanagh, 1616, 232
O'Brislan's Koll of duties due to Maguire, 234
obtains resolution of judges erroneously, describing the Irish tenure
as Gavelkind, 237
Chichester's Proclamation of Amnesty, 1604, 231
Gavelkind unknown in Ireland until the Penal Laws, 236
Tanistry, case of considered, 238
letter to Salisbury, Nov., 11, 1606, " the Chief Justice and I now
find the occupiers are freeholders," 239
his overtures that these inferior freeholds are vested in the Crown,
and that informations of intrusion should be preferred, 240
letter to Salisbury, Sept., 24, 1610, 231
" I held the occupiers were not freeholders, but had only a scramb-
ling or transitory possession," 244
policv of confiscation substituted for that of making freeholders,
241
large grants of confiscated lands to Chichester and Davis, 243
massacre of 1641, the outcome of his chicanery, 243
DEARBHFORGAIL
44 years of age in 1152, the year of the supposed elopement, 312
the evidence as to sifted, 313
died near Mellifont in her 85th year (1193), 313
INDEX. 425
DED ANNAN
Tuatha Dedanuan, not mythological beings, 27
DEIRDRE
sorrowful tale of, 66
her farewell to Alba, 68
DESJARDINS, M.
gives the variants of Taruanna, 150
DIODORUS SICULUS
quotation from, describing the idol worship of Moloch at Carthage, 31
DOLMENS
building of in Erin and abroad, 7, 8
distribution of, and Borlase's view, 10
Dowden, J., Bishop,
his view as to the form of the Gaelic tonsure, sustained, 209
DRUIDS
word connected with dm, a tree, 200
magic trees in Erin, the mountain ash, the hazel, the yew, and the
blackthorn, 200
draoidheact meant wizardry ; the Gaelic druids wizards not priests
references to by Cicero, Timagenes and Ammianus, 201
Caesar's account ; what he says of the German true of the Gael, 203
no human sacrifices in Erin as in Gaul, 203
no evidence that Druidism passed from Britain to Gaul, 203
DUNLANG
the massacre of the maidens at Tara, 92
EASTER
some necessary details about the Paschal controvers}^, 358
Easter day defined, 360
the method of computing Easter explained (note), 360
the celebration of Easter on the 14th moon, being Sunday, instead
of waiting until the following Sunday was the Gaelic use, 360
The only difference that could arise from this was that the Gaelic
Easter might be the Roman Palm Sunday once or twice in a
century, 361
charged with keeping Easter with the Jews, i.e, the Quartodeciman
heresy, 361-2
EARLS, THE
causes of the flight of, 243
10,000 pounds reward to the man who should kill the Earl of
Tyrone and escape, 241
"Services of this kind {i.e., assassination) imto princes were
commonly most obligatory when done without their know-
ledge." Sir H. Wotton, Ambassador at Venice, 243
426 INDEX.
ELOI, ST. (EUgius) 588-659, A.D.
founds Solignac in'' the suburbium of Limoges — way of life at
Luxeuil to be followed. Rules of Columba and Benedict to be
observed, 187
enumeration of heathenish practices like those in Erin, 188
ERIN-ERIU
derivation of the name, 1
political divisions of, at yarious times, generally fivefold, 62
description of by Bede and others
situated between Britain and Spain (Tacitus) 36
Paleololithic man did not come to, 2
Neolithic inhabitants of came from Southern France, and built
the Dolmens, 3
The ethnic Celts of Central France never came to ; legends as to
first four " occupations " (Gabala) of, 14-38
The fifth occupation was by the Gael, 4-39
Chronology of our texts and of Sacred Annals (popular view)
tables of, 20
At the coming of St. Patrick the formation of a strong central
government seemed probable, 246
the population then conjectured to be 850,000, 246
EUROPEAN
Racial Table, 21-44
FERDOMNACH
the "Book of Armagh" in his handwriting, 170
FIACC'S HYMN
Statement as to birth place of St. Patrick, 149
Fiachra
second son of Eocaid Muighmheadon, ancestor of the Ui Briain of
Connact, 109
FINN MAC CUMHAIL
the story of his parentage, 99
his marriage with Graine, 100
the Fianna of Erin, 101
FIRBIS, MAC
his observations on race characteristics, 44
FIRE, THE CELESTIAL
Production of — the tene eigen, i.e., fox'ced fire in Erin, 191
the fire of St. Bridget, 195
Flann
of the monastery, his synchronisms, 16
Fodla OUamh, 57
Freppel, C. E., bishop of Angers ; his canons of sovmd criticism, 143
INDEX. 427
GAEL
the coming of, 39
first arrivals of, said to have come from the North of Spain, 49
pedigrees of, traced to the three sons of Golamh (the soldier) or to
his nephew, Ith, 41, 96
how placed on the land in B.C. 750, 51
not ethnic Celts, but belong to the Nordic race, fulfil all the
conditions laid down by Deniker, 44, 48
Regnal years of the kings of the four lines, 52
description of their conquests in Wales, etc, 117
religion of, before the reception of the Faith, the religion of the
Celestial Fire, 185
European racial types, 42
Cephalic indexes and height, etc, 47, 48
Gall-Gael
The sea-divided Gael or foreigners resident in Erin, 272
GAELIC OATH
oldest forms of, 189
Gasquet, Abbot
describes the Columban rule as one of great severity, and inferior
in practical sense to the Benedictine, 187
Germanus
Bishop of Auxerre, 147
and Lupus, mission to Wales against Pelagians, 156
Glastonbury of the Gael,
position of described, 123
name derived from Gaelic " inis glais duinn^^ — island of the browa
river, 122
The vetusta ecdesia there a Church of St. Patrick, and so described in
the Charters of Ina and Baldrid, 124
an island called Little Erin (Beg Eriu) with a chapel of St.
Bridget on it there, 125
Columban monks there displaced for Benedictines — Camden's
account of, 126
the finding of Arthur's remains there, enormous size of his bones, 121
GUINEVERE
the wife of Arthur ( 1 Finnabhair), finding of her remains
GOLL MAC MORN A
the head of the Firvolcic Fianna in Connact, 102
GRAVES, BISHOP
service, in fixing the date of the " Book of Armagh," 171
HALLSTADT
the capital of Celtic civilization during the Hallstadt period,
850-600 B.C., 50
428 INDEX.
HALM
amendment of passage in Agricola, suggested by, 37
HAVERFIELD
succinct account by, in Poole's Historical Atlas, agrees with article
in Edinhiirgh Review as to the duration of the Roman occupa-
tion of Southern Scotland, 151
HERICUS
states that St. Patrick studied under Germanus. 1 48
HOGAN, E.
the Irish wolf-dog, 139
the Irish people, their height, form, and strength, 47
Honoratus, St.
founded monastery at Lerins, now St. Honorat, 410 A.D., became
Metropolitan of Aries and died 428 A.D., 147
ITALIA
meaning of an official language after Diocletian, 141
JEROME, ST.
refers to Attacotti in a famous passage, 6
describes the irruption of the barbarians into Gaul, in 406 A.D., 131
refers to Pelagius, 154
JOCELYN
a French Cistercian from Furness, his falsifications of tradition, 1 83
LAOGHAIRE
tells St. Patrick that Niall did not permit him to believe, 207
his conversion, 208
LIA FAIL
the stone of destiny, 252
removed from Tara to Scotland, and now in Westminster Abbey, 256
MAGH RATH (Moira)
battle of (637), 167
MAGH SLECHT
worship of Crom Cruaich, a Semitic cult there, 29
MAELSEACHLAINN II. + 1022, defeats Norsemen at Tara, (980), 296
proclamation of the famous rising, 296
his doings for the first 14 years of his reign, applies in vain to the
ISTorthern Ui Neil to assist him against Brian, and then
submits, 301
not guilty of treachery at Clontarf, 307
resumes Ardrighship after Clontarf, 310
defeat of Norse at, had no political result of immediate importance,
extracts to prove this, 310
INDEX. 429
MATILDA, Countess of Tuscany
Second Cartnla of donation by act inter vivos, not a will, made at
Canossa in 1102, 384
her first Cartnla destroyed during scenes of anarchy in Rome in
11th and 12th centimes (note), 384
Medbh (Meve)
queen of Connact, contemporary with Cleopatra the original, semble,
of Spenser's Queen Mab, 64
invasion of Ulster by, 75
MEYER, KUNO
his translation of the poems on Magh Slecht, 95
MONKS
early history of monasticism and dates of the foundations of prin-
cipal monasteries, 330
testimony of Cassian as to the discipline at Tabenna, 333
testimony of Sozomen, a lawyer, that it was the monks who kept the
people free from the Arian heresy, 334
observations on monastic rules, requisites of an adequate and com-
prehensive rule, 334
St. Basil's rule unrivalled for richness, variety and culture, and was
used by St. Columba, 335
St. Basil's rule compared with St. Benedict's, 336
the Benedictine use as to the dedication of boys under age compared
with the Gaelic use and that of St. Basil, 338
legal difficulties in the way of an open profession of a vow of casitas,
and the subjection of the monasteries to central control, 339
the imperial government made regulations concerning the monas-
teries, 340
the " use of Lerins " in the rule of CEesarius brought to Erin, 341
the ascetical writings of Columbanus, 342
the rule as to food prescribing only one meal at sundown the snme
as the usage in secular life, 343
the " use " as regards food at lona according to Adamnan, 344
MORINI—" furthest of men," 132
history of, by Malbrancq, 157
MUIGHMHEADON, EOCAID (Mweevaeon),
king of Connact and afterwai'ds Ardrigh, 109
married Mong Finn, sixth in descent from Olioll Olum, 109
died at Tara" and was succeeded by Mong Finn's brother, Crim-
thann, 113
MUIR N'ICHT
Meaning of " icht " : meant the supposed channel between Erin
and France, 119
MUIRCHERTACH of the Leather Cloaks
his circuit of Erin, described by Cormacan Eigeas ( + 948), 284
slain in a battle near Ardee, (948), 286
430 INDEX.
MUIRCU
wrote his selections under the direction of Aedh, bishop of Sletty,
173
the author's, and Todd's and Barry's, translations of his Preface, 174
his story of the saint carrying the fawn, 183
Northmen
invasion of divisible into two periods, 268
details as to first period, (795-845,) 269, 273
story as to the sovereignty of Turgesius, unsupported by evidence,
271
details as to second period, (845-1014,) 273
Dubhgall cannot mean people of the dark type, 273
nature and extent of their occupation, 274
Ardrigh, during time of, exercised his sovereign rights as usual, 275
NIALL GLUNDUBH
led the Northern and Southern Ui Neil to the aid of the men of
Jjeinster and Munster, but was defeated at the battle of
Kilmashogue, near Rathfarnham (917), by the Northmen, 282
NIALL OF THE NINE HOSTAGES,
the fifth son of Eocaid Muighmheadon and Carinna, a Saxon, born
out of wedlock, 110
description of, 45
became Ardrigh, with the assent of his half-brothers, 115
the slaying of Niall in France, 116
NOINDEN ULAD
the meaning of, 77
NORTHMEN
the most serious part of the raidings by, was the taking of captives,
289
learning and literature flourish during the 9th and 10th centuries.
289
their position in the latter half of the 10th century, 290
bardic account of in the "War of the Gael with the Gaill," con-
sidered, 292
O'HANLON, CANON
places Magh Slecht near Feenagh, in Leitrim, 29
O'SULLIVAN, PHILIP
says voyage from Kinsale to France took scarcely more than two
days, and to Spain three days, 139
OISIN
commands the Clanna Baoisgne at the battle of Gabhra, near the
Hill of Skreen (284 a.d.), Caoilte and he said to have been the
sole survivors on his side, 106
INDEX. 431
OTWAY, CiESAR
describes how a storm drove great waves over Tory Island, 17
PALLADIUS
the first bishop sent to the Gael, Patrick the first bishop sent for
them, 156
PATRICIAN DOCUMENTS
in the " Book of Armagh,'" what they are, 173
the collections in the " Book of Armagh " to be preferred to those
of a later date, 181
PATRICK, St.
the coming of, 131
Patrician dates of birth, death, suggested (note), 131
(his birthplace was in a rural district (vicus), belonging to the civitas
of Taruanna, now Therouannein France).
Taruanna, derived from tor^ abhann (pronounced ouann), the fenced
town of the river (Lys), and equates with Nem-thor (note),
133
Teruenna, Taverna, Teruenta, variants of Tabernia, 150, 417
his capture, slavery with Milchu, and escape to Foclut — The route
taken (note), 138
his journey through the three Gauls into the province and the
islands, 140
makes his first theological studies at Lerins, now St. Honorat,
146-178
Studies next under St. Germanus, 148
his call to be the apostle of Erin, 152
his sojourn with the Britons, 153
suggested position of the Britons,
ordained by Pope Celestine, 148
Bury's view not adopted (note). 175
was the unnamed bishop referred to by Prosper of Acquitaine, 160
AdlaHis bishop of the Morini, Malbrancq's history, 160
why the Confession does not refer to the Roman mission, 162
the saint's account of his labours in Ireland, 164
Legends and traditions respecting, 170
The Books (Libri) or Epistles of the saint, 166
The Epistle to Coroticus not genuine, and its rejection by the early
Church, 168
Bury's view that it was omitted from the " Book of Armagh "
because the Scribe " scamped his work " not adopted, (note)
167
died on the 17th March, 493, 131, 165, 179,
absurd charge, that he stole several relics at Rome, and that he
stole them with the connivance of the Pope considered, 181
Zimmer's imtrtithful statement that the saint admitted he had
committed adultery in his 16th year exposed, 181
432 INDEX
PELAGIUS
the errors of his followers, 154
Semi Pelagians, 155
Some views of, probably reached Erin, 211
POLYBIUS
quoted for old-old saying. " Fortune only lends her favours to
Nations," 128
PHCENICIANS
went to the North Sea for amber, but did not enter the Baltic
Sea, 33
took tin from the Cassiterides, which lay to the north of Gallicia
in Spain, 33
Hamilco, the Carthagenian, sails to Erin ; account of by
Avienus, 35
from them Marianas and Ptolemy derived their knowledge of
Erin, 36
POTfflER, E.
gives the route of the etlinic Celts from the East, 8
PROSPER OF ACQUITAINE.
quotation from " De Providential' ascribed to him, 141
from his chronicle, 154
from the Coiitra Gollatorem, the Bishop therein referred to was St.
Patrick, 161
Red Branch Knights
the standard of a yellow lion on a ground of green satin, 267
ROUND TOWERS
origin of from firehouse of Pagans, continued in the aregal of St
Patrick, 316, 417
Rudraidh the Great
ancestor of the Clanna Rury , 6 8
Salisbury, John of
strong letter from St. Bernard, recommending him for immediate
promotion, to Theobald, Archbishop of Canterbury, formerly
Abbot of Bee, 382
states in the Metalogicus "at my solicitation he, i.e., Pope
Adrian lY., Hibernia to Henrv II. granted" 382
the letter of investiture then mentioned by him not the famous
Laudalnliter, 285
SOLDI, M. EMILE
seeks in " La Langue Sacree " to solve the mystery of the cup
markings, 7
these a prayer for resurrection, in the Cosmoglyphic language, 1 2
TACITUS
text of relating to Hibernia from the Toletan MS., 37
INDEX. 433
TAIN BO CUAILNGE
meaning of the words, 74
analysis of legends regarding, 74
Senchan Torpeist assembled the bards to recover text, and St.
Kieran wrote it down from the lips of Fergus MacRoy, 79
the fight with Ferdiad, the most famous episode in the Tain,
extracts from, it in translation, 80
TARA
suggested derivation of the word, 52
position of, 247
desertion of, not caused by the curse of St. Ruadhan, 265
TIGHERNMAS
reign of ; dies with three-fourths of the men of Erin of the plague,
at Magh Slecht, 55
The story may well be doubted, 56
TIGHERNACH
Annals of ; monumenta inncerta ; meaning of : not uncertain but
unsettled, 59
TIRECHAN
the text a piece of literary joinery, 176
TONSURE
Gaelic form of, 209
TRIBAL CUSTOMS
in Wales and Erin, 220
the Four Hearths, 221
the Eric fine, 223
the Honour Price List, 225
the tribal occupier and Sir J. Davis, 226
occupation compared with German, 227
the " taking of stock," indicating tenure, 229
the ownership of the land was in the tribe, 229
policy of Henrv VIII. to "settle" the land and make " f ree-
• holders," 230
Ua Cannanain Ruadhri
slain in the " counterblow " of the battle of Muine Brocain, in
Meath, in which he defeated the foreigners, with the loss of
6,000 (948), 286
UI CLERIGH
The chief of the Four Masters gives the computations of the Septua-
gint, 20
expulsion of, from Donegal, during the Ulster confiscations, and
settlement of at Foile Clerigh (Clery's Rock) on the borders
of Limerick (note),
two of the kindred on the Grand Jury who found true bills against
the Earls (note). 111
434 INDEX
I
WILFRID, ST.
his birth and life, by Eddius, 367
his education at Lindisfarne, 367
his stay at Lyons. Delphinus, then Archbishop there, offered him
his niece to wife,
returns to England after the death of Delphinus, 367
the Paschal Cycle of Dionysius and the bogus canon, 368
expulsion of the Columban monks from Ripon, 369
is ordained priest by Agilbert, a transitory bishop, against the
Canon law, 363
the Synod at Whitby (664) got up by Wilfrid's zeal, assisted by
Agilbert, 371
the accounts given by Eddius, a contemporary official record of the
Benedictine Order, adopted as trustworthy, 372
the strictures of Dr. M'Carthy, P.P., on Wilfrid, 374
after the Synod goes to France to be consecrated, and is received
with triumphal honours by the French bishops, 375
baptism by compulsion, and the story of the boy carried off from
his parents, 375
Bishop Chad reordained through all the ecclesiastical orders, 376
rules the Diocese of Northumbria from 668 to 678, 377
Etheldreda, the wife of King Egfrid, receives the veil from Wilfrid,
and he receives from her lands at Hexham, 12 miles long and 6
miles broad, 377
after her profession as a religious, Egfrid marries again in her life-
time, 377
his quarrel with Ermenburga, Egfrid's second wife ; his expulsion
and appeal to Rome, which was in the main successful, 378
at the Synod on Widd near Ripon, (705) allowed to retain the
small See of Hexham and the Abbey of Ripon, 378
his distribution by will of his gold and his silver and his precious
stones, 378
his death (700), and his epitaph which refers to the bogus canon, 378
VICTOR
confused with Victorious, the Apostle of the Marini, 153
WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR
without denying the overlordship of the Pope, refuses to take the
feudal oath (fidelitatem), 386
WINDISCH, E.
his splendid edition of the Tain referred to (note), 74
ZIMMER
his omission in reference to the name Arthur noticed (note), 16
his extraordinary statement about St. Patrick, 181
his views hasty and ill-considered on the Pelagian question, 211
FEB 2 0 19W'
/
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY